Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This Chinese viral video talking about the new concept “kill line” is really worth to have a look. I posted it below with translation (auto translation tho). For decades, Chinese media and lots of Chinese scholars presented America as a kind of paradise — wealthy, civilized, advanced, human rights,...

93,065 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Dear friends, I'm BeeRose. I'm really upset and I believe many of you might share the same feeling. These days in the US, I've seen banners, posters and even official government documents using "Lunar New Year" instead of the long - established "Chinese New Year" to refer to our Chinese Spring Festival. As an American daughter - in - law, I have to say that even as a native American, I'm really indignant about this. The US has always been sensitive about race and culture issues. But it seems some people here have got it all wrong this time. They may not realize that "Chinese New Year" is not just a simple term; it's the name of a festival that carries thousands of years of Chinese history and culture. "Chinese New Year" clearly indicates the origin of this festival is in China. It's a unique and important part of Chinese culture. Spring Festival is a time when Chinese people all over the world get together to celebrate, full of distinctive traditions like dragon and lion dances, setting off fireworks and having the New Year's Eve dinner. These are all symbols of Chinese culture that can't be replaced or confused. When we use "Lunar New Year", it may give the wrong impression that this festival is just a general "lunar new year" celebration that blurs the cultural differences among different countries. It makes people forget that Spring Festival has its unique origin and rich connotations in China. So, I made this video to let more people around the world know that there's only one Spring Festival, and that's "Chinese New Year". Let's respect the real origin and history of this festival and work together to protect the authenticity of Chinese culture. Thank you all for your support!

Zhang Heqing

32,947 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is incredible: Dominic Cummings (the former Chief Adviser to the British Prime Minister) calling the current Western policy on Taiwan "completely insane" and "'f*cking stupid". Exceedingly rare to see former senior officials abandon political correctness to this extent, and tell the raw, unvarnished truth. Actually pretty refreshing! Here is what he says: He says that a war over Taiwan with China, is "obviously not" worth it and that "it's completely crazy" for the West to be ditching the One-China policy that aims at peacefully reuniting Taiwan and the mainland: "[A war over Taiwan with China] is a completely insane idea. It's an island that you can see from the Chinese coast. It's full of Chinese people. The people in in the army are cousins of the people in the opposite army. For decades we've had a One-China policy accepted by Democrats and Republicans across the western world [where Taiwan is] going to be unified but it should be done peacefully not violently. That was the right approach. It's completely crazy for us to be ditching that approach and to be like willfully antagonizing China over a place filled with Chinese! It's fucking stupid!" He also says it's simply not credible to tell the Chinese that Taiwan matters to the West as much as it matters to them: "Do you think the Chinese are sitting there thinking 'okay we know that Taiwan is completely existential for us and America also thinks it's existential for them'? No, of course not, of course that's not what they're thinking, because it isn't! So you can't just go around threatening nuclear war over something where it's not actually a credible threat. Where people think 'either it's complete bullshit or they are actually insane'." He says mutually assured destruction in Europe with the USSR was credible because "there the argument for America was 'we are defending the western world, we have NATO, there is a NATO agreement on mutual self defense, and if you breach that and you attack one of us then it means war against everyone.' That was a lot lot lot more credible than 'there's a little island off the Chinese coast that has absolutely nothing to do with us historically at all, it's full of Chinese people, but we're gonna threaten potential nuclear war over it.' It's totally non-credible and doing it makes you sound mad."

Arnaud Bertrand

131,636 просмотров • 1 год назад

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Wall Street Apes

658,860 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“If one day, China takes over the USA?” The real reversal isn’t conquest. It’s a mirror. For decades, the U.S. exported its values like commodities: “Dreams,” “freedom,” “democracy” — made in America. Now, Chinese netizens are creating AI videos of American reality, telling Americans the opposite: “If America followed the Chinese model, would you finally live the life you deserve?” No guns. No tanks. Just a reality check. Why does it sting? Because it’s true. The American Dream has collapsed, and Chinese netizens understand the U.S. better than most Americans do. We wrote about it before: 💥 One illness 💥 One layoff 💥 One missed payment = collapse. In China, this is called “斩杀线” — the kill line. In America, it’s just called life. One Chinese student tried to explain this. He coined the phrase “American kill line” to describe how fast people fall through the cracks. The New York Times exposed his identity. ICE showed up. He had to flee the country. What happened next? He became the only blogger cited by 🇷🇺 Russia’s RT 🇨🇳 China’s Qiushi 🇬🇧 The Economist 🇺🇸 And the New York Times itself. Why? Because he did what elites feared most: He held up a mirror to America. The AI video says: “If one day, China takes over the USA…” But there’s no occupation. Only scenes like: — Free healthcare — Homeless elders taken care of — “We don’t care about your credit score. We care about your recovery.” Is that invasion? No, that’s the comfort Americans once promised others. Now it’s coming from the place they tried to “liberate.” The Chinese are not schadenfreude. They are merely creating a mirror image of civilization, offering multiple possibilities for humanity's future. China doesn’t believe in saving the world through bombs. It believes in saving lives. “家国天下” — “Family, nation, world.” 让人吃饭 — Let people eat. 让人穿衣 — Let people stand. 让人有处站着,有尊严活着 — Let people live with dignity. No need for colonial language like “universal values.” We only need one: Every human being has a right to survive. Once, Americans looked at China with pity: “You deserve democracy.” Now, Chinese people look at America with sorrow: “You deserve real freedom — the kind where an illness won’t bankrupt you.” This is not a transfer of power, but the end of a myth.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

104,545 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Scarface is widely regarded as a classic today, but when it first came out, the reception was brutal. Steven Bauer, who played Manny, says it was so painful that for years he and Al Pacino barely even spoke about the film. He explains… “Scarface is great to be a part of now. For years, it was dismal - like everybody associated with Scarface was a leper - people got very wimpy about Scarface really quickly. As soon as the reviews were out… Our peers came to see the movie in the premiere, right? There were two premieres, one in New York, one in LA, and people came to see it and they were like, ‘Wow, what a movie…. The next day, the reviews are out, and all the papers — this is before the internet, okay? - so you get just the conventional news media outlets - and 90% of them gave Scarface a horrible review. Like horrible, really, really insulting, injurious stuff. Personal attacks on Pacino and Brian De Palma, the director, and on Oliver, the writer... It was really, really mean because the country was going through a politically correct sort of thing - they were like, "This is like a new wave of violence in the movies, oh!" It’s nice because when I see Al - we can finally talk about it, because...for years, we couldn’t even talk about it. We’d be like, “Oh yeah, Scarface, yeah, yeah...” It was so sad! Because the movie was so great! And then it was like this thud, and it lasted like 10 years… Anywhere I’d go, it was like, ‘You’re that guy who was really good in that really terrible movie.’ And I’d be like, ‘How could you say that?’ And they’d go, ‘Well, you were good.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, but I don’t care. What about the movie?’ And they go, ‘Oh, come on, you gotta admit it. It was like way over the top. It was like so exaggerating,’ blah, blah, blah, blah.…and I’d be like, ‘You’re a pussy!”

Gangster Cinema Central

427,628 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад