Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference... show more
41,371,188 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments

Western Lensman2 years ago
CNN “fact checks.” How is this even real?

Zaki Solja2 years ago
They literally shut Trump off and gave Kamala the opportunity to lie.

Western Lensman2 years ago
💯

Eric Pistey2 years ago
Kamala repeatedly told blatant lies that are were so refutable but ABC moderators refused to do so.

Western Lensman2 years ago
By not “fact checking” them, that false information was conferred validity by the moderators.

Brick Suit2 years ago
The one about police officers dying on J6 is especially egregious.

Western Lensman2 years ago
And it’s repeated ad nauseam.

AppPatriotgirl 🇺🇸2 years ago
ABC should lose their FCC license and be charged with election interference.

RedWave Press2 years ago
Great analysis! ABC News was out to get Trump the moment the debate started. A study showed ABC News is 100% positive in their coverage of Kamala and 93% negative in their coverage of Trump.

Western Lensman2 years ago
Yep.

