Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference... show more
41,371,188 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)
10 Kommentare

Western Lensmanvor 2 Jahren
CNN “fact checks.” How is this even real?

Zaki Soljavor 2 Jahren
They literally shut Trump off and gave Kamala the opportunity to lie.

Western Lensmanvor 2 Jahren
💯

Eric Pisteyvor 2 Jahren
Kamala repeatedly told blatant lies that are were so refutable but ABC moderators refused to do so.

Western Lensmanvor 2 Jahren
By not “fact checking” them, that false information was conferred validity by the moderators.

Brick Suitvor 2 Jahren
The one about police officers dying on J6 is especially egregious.

Western Lensmanvor 2 Jahren
And it’s repeated ad nauseam.

AppPatriotgirl 🇺🇸vor 2 Jahren
ABC should lose their FCC license and be charged with election interference.

RedWave Pressvor 2 Jahren
Great analysis! ABC News was out to get Trump the moment the debate started. A study showed ABC News is 100% positive in their coverage of Kamala and 93% negative in their coverage of Trump.

Western Lensmanvor 2 Jahren
Yep.

