Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This CNN panel desperately tried to demonize Trump's admin for "starving children" by not funding SNAP. Their argument collapsed when they misrepresented the SNAP contingency fund judges forced Trump to spend. Scott Jennings nailed it: "That is literally a king, spending money that is not appropriated." The "rainy day"...

MediasLies's profile picture

Media Lies

301,290 subscribers

331,636 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin to Spend SNAP Funds — Separation of Powers on Thin Ice The Trump team argued it couldn’t legally use the $5 B contingency fund to pay food benefits during the shutdown. Judge Indira Talwani, an Obama-appointed federal judge in Massachusetts, disagreed — ruling yes you can, and you must. 💰 USDA said the reserve was for “emergencies,” not routine funding gaps. ⚖️ Talwani ruled SNAP is a mandatory program and ordered the administration to use the money anyway. Here’s the problem 👇 The Constitution gives Congress the sole power of the purse — not the judiciary. The Supreme Court recently warned (in Trump v. CASA, 2025) that district judges have no business issuing nationwide orders or managing executive operations. Telling a sitting President how to allocate funds Congress hasn’t appropriated walks straight into a separation-of-powers minefield. Whether you support Trump or not, one unelected judge directing the executive branch’s spending decisions should alarm everyone. Welcome to 2025 — where one judge’s pen outweighs the Constitution’s separation of powers.
1:23

🚨 Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin to Spend SNAP Funds — Separation of Powers on Thin Ice The Trump team argued it couldn’t legally use the $5 B contingency fund to pay food benefits during the shutdown. Judge Indira Talwani, an Obama-appointed federal judge in Massachusetts, disagreed — ruling yes you can, and you must. 💰 USDA said the reserve was for “emergencies,” not routine funding gaps. ⚖️ Talwani ruled SNAP is a mandatory program and ordered the administration to use the money anyway. Here’s the problem 👇 The Constitution gives Congress the sole power of the purse — not the judiciary. The Supreme Court recently warned (in Trump v. CASA, 2025) that district judges have no business issuing nationwide orders or managing executive operations. Telling a sitting President how to allocate funds Congress hasn’t appropriated walks straight into a separation-of-powers minefield. Whether you support Trump or not, one unelected judge directing the executive branch’s spending decisions should alarm everyone. Welcome to 2025 — where one judge’s pen outweighs the Constitution’s separation of powers.

Jake

85,016 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: In an infuriating development, President Trump is now being forced by Democrats to use WAR-TIME FUNDING for some SNAP benefits These are funds meant for full-on catastrophes, national emergencies and WAR. "We are digging into a contingency fund meant for emergencies, catastrophes and WAR! The president does not want to tap into this fund in the future." "Anyone who needs that assistance...DEMOCRATS are holding it up and making it difficult to get those payments out the door!" DISGUSTING, Chuck Schumer.
1:33

🚨 JUST IN: In an infuriating development, President Trump is now being forced by Democrats to use WAR-TIME FUNDING for some SNAP benefits These are funds meant for full-on catastrophes, national emergencies and WAR. "We are digging into a contingency fund meant for emergencies, catastrophes and WAR! The president does not want to tap into this fund in the future." "Anyone who needs that assistance...DEMOCRATS are holding it up and making it difficult to get those payments out the door!" DISGUSTING, Chuck Schumer.

Eric Daugherty

412,008 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Scott Jennings ends the careers of every Democrat on the CNN panel, by nailing the issue about activist judges illegally interfering with the Trump presidency. He starts with Gretchen Carlson who clearly wants “individual judges who hate Donald Trump to tie him up for four years.” Chris Sununu interjects and leaves the Dems speechless when he brings up the issue of “judge shopping.” Then Jennings owns Alencia Johnson and Ellie Honig on how Joe Biden repeatedly defied the Supreme Court on student loan debt “cancellation.” The hypocrisy of Democrats saying leaders should listen to judges is astounding. Especially after Pennsylvania blatantly defied the Supreme Court when it came to elections. The best is at the end where Abby Phillip condescendingly tells Jennings “let me explain it to you a little more slowly.” Jennings lets her have it after that. Ultimately, Jennings is right that activist judges don’t get to “compel the executive branch” to spend tax dollars specifically how they see fit. If there’s a major policy issue, take it to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, these district judges need to be ignored. They’re nothing but unhinged lunatics with EDS, TDS, and DDS.
3:00

Scott Jennings ends the careers of every Democrat on the CNN panel, by nailing the issue about activist judges illegally interfering with the Trump presidency. He starts with Gretchen Carlson who clearly wants “individual judges who hate Donald Trump to tie him up for four years.” Chris Sununu interjects and leaves the Dems speechless when he brings up the issue of “judge shopping.” Then Jennings owns Alencia Johnson and Ellie Honig on how Joe Biden repeatedly defied the Supreme Court on student loan debt “cancellation.” The hypocrisy of Democrats saying leaders should listen to judges is astounding. Especially after Pennsylvania blatantly defied the Supreme Court when it came to elections. The best is at the end where Abby Phillip condescendingly tells Jennings “let me explain it to you a little more slowly.” Jennings lets her have it after that. Ultimately, Jennings is right that activist judges don’t get to “compel the executive branch” to spend tax dollars specifically how they see fit. If there’s a major policy issue, take it to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, these district judges need to be ignored. They’re nothing but unhinged lunatics with EDS, TDS, and DDS.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

1,118,700 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NEW: Critics are melting down over the Trump admin approving state waivers to restrict SNAP (food stamps) purchases of junk food. They are claiming it will "dismantle" the program, raise grocery costs for everyone, and that restrictions "don't work." This is a key part of the "Make America Healthy Again" agenda: ensuring taxpayer dollars fund nutritious foods, not sugar-loaded garbage. The Trump team is reversing years of USDA denials, now empowering states to promote healthier choices. 18 states are already approved, with restrictions starting in 2026, and more on the way.
1:41

NEW: Critics are melting down over the Trump admin approving state waivers to restrict SNAP (food stamps) purchases of junk food. They are claiming it will "dismantle" the program, raise grocery costs for everyone, and that restrictions "don't work." This is a key part of the "Make America Healthy Again" agenda: ensuring taxpayer dollars fund nutritious foods, not sugar-loaded garbage. The Trump team is reversing years of USDA denials, now empowering states to promote healthier choices. 18 states are already approved, with restrictions starting in 2026, and more on the way.

E X X ➠A L E R T S

30,053 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Scott Jennings makes CNN panelist look foolish with basic facts about the government shutdown. Dylan Douglas tried to go somewhere with this, but with Scott Jennings in his way, he had no chance. DOUGLAS: “Scott, with all respect, you cannot put on the American people that Democrats were the ones that were hurting people making this plight.” JENNINGS: “Who was casting the votes against opening the government, Democrats or Republicans?” DOUGLAS: “Who was wanting to—” JENNINGS: “No, no. Who was casting the votes?” DOUGLAS: “Scott, who was wanting to cut SNAP benefits?” JENNINGS: “Nobody. Republicans voted to fund SNAP 15 times.” DOUGLAS: “Who was playing up SNAP benefits after two courts ruled that it was unallowed?” JENNINGS: “Republicans voted to fund SNAP 15 times. Democrats voted to defund it 15 times. And we had to get eight to join us.” DOUGLAS: “Talk about the Affordable Health Care Act. Okay?” JENNINGS: “It’s terrible.” DOUGLAS: “Landmark legislation is not perfect.” JENNINGS: “That is an understatement.” DOUGLAS: “[Democrats] wanted a fight, but they found a fight that was worth fighting with—talking about the Affordable Health Care Act. People were with them. Democrats were leading in the polls. We won big on Tuesday.” JENNINGS: “That’s what it was for, right? It was for the election, right?” DOUGLAS: “Well, I think we should have kept going. What I don’t understand… [is] why we caved so soon when the American people seemed to be on—” JENNINGS: “Because the election ended. You just said it. It was for the election. Listen, the election ended, then you caved.”
1:33

Scott Jennings makes CNN panelist look foolish with basic facts about the government shutdown. Dylan Douglas tried to go somewhere with this, but with Scott Jennings in his way, he had no chance. DOUGLAS: “Scott, with all respect, you cannot put on the American people that Democrats were the ones that were hurting people making this plight.” JENNINGS: “Who was casting the votes against opening the government, Democrats or Republicans?” DOUGLAS: “Who was wanting to—” JENNINGS: “No, no. Who was casting the votes?” DOUGLAS: “Scott, who was wanting to cut SNAP benefits?” JENNINGS: “Nobody. Republicans voted to fund SNAP 15 times.” DOUGLAS: “Who was playing up SNAP benefits after two courts ruled that it was unallowed?” JENNINGS: “Republicans voted to fund SNAP 15 times. Democrats voted to defund it 15 times. And we had to get eight to join us.” DOUGLAS: “Talk about the Affordable Health Care Act. Okay?” JENNINGS: “It’s terrible.” DOUGLAS: “Landmark legislation is not perfect.” JENNINGS: “That is an understatement.” DOUGLAS: “[Democrats] wanted a fight, but they found a fight that was worth fighting with—talking about the Affordable Health Care Act. People were with them. Democrats were leading in the polls. We won big on Tuesday.” JENNINGS: “That’s what it was for, right? It was for the election, right?” DOUGLAS: “Well, I think we should have kept going. What I don’t understand… [is] why we caved so soon when the American people seemed to be on—” JENNINGS: “Because the election ended. You just said it. It was for the election. Listen, the election ended, then you caved.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

183,706 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I want you to listen to this clip from cynicalurbanhomesteader because this week. Starvation is about to be used as a weapon against the American people in order to get Democrats to fold on the government shutdown. Let’s be clear, regardless of the shutdown SNAP payments were going, the Big Billionaire Benevolence Bill took care of that. This is NOT on Democrats. Trump has made an unconscionable deliberate decision to starve Americans for political gain. There are funds available to feed people during a shutdown but he has decided to block their use. Not only that, he has declared that if states step in to help, they will not be recompensed for the funds they use. Trump is taking a page out of the Netanyahu playbook. How long before rich people start evicting poor people and poisoning water? Oh wait, it’s already happening. November 1st will mark the day when humanity left the room and his own voters are fed to the wolves, as he screams ‘Let them eat cake’ while he and his donors press on with a ballroom as the people starve. 🎥 TikTok -
4:15

I want you to listen to this clip from cynicalurbanhomesteader because this week. Starvation is about to be used as a weapon against the American people in order to get Democrats to fold on the government shutdown. Let’s be clear, regardless of the shutdown SNAP payments were going, the Big Billionaire Benevolence Bill took care of that. This is NOT on Democrats. Trump has made an unconscionable deliberate decision to starve Americans for political gain. There are funds available to feed people during a shutdown but he has decided to block their use. Not only that, he has declared that if states step in to help, they will not be recompensed for the funds they use. Trump is taking a page out of the Netanyahu playbook. How long before rich people start evicting poor people and poisoning water? Oh wait, it’s already happening. November 1st will mark the day when humanity left the room and his own voters are fed to the wolves, as he screams ‘Let them eat cake’ while he and his donors press on with a ballroom as the people starve. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

52,568 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Bill Maher: “42M people are going to lose their food stamps [today]… What is your opinion on this as a member of Congress?” Marjorie Taylor Greene: “I believe we should fund the government. I voted on September 18th to fund it.” Bill Maher: “Can’t we do this without funding the government? Isn’t there an emergency fund that they just won’t let be used?” Marjorie Taylor Greene: “My understanding is that’s $5B, but that’s not quite enough to fund for a full month, which is $8-$9B… The best solution is for the Democrats and the Republicans in the Senate to stop playing games.” “The American people are being used like a pinata in this situation.”
2:50

Bill Maher: “42M people are going to lose their food stamps [today]… What is your opinion on this as a member of Congress?” Marjorie Taylor Greene: “I believe we should fund the government. I voted on September 18th to fund it.” Bill Maher: “Can’t we do this without funding the government? Isn’t there an emergency fund that they just won’t let be used?” Marjorie Taylor Greene: “My understanding is that’s $5B, but that’s not quite enough to fund for a full month, which is $8-$9B… The best solution is for the Democrats and the Republicans in the Senate to stop playing games.” “The American people are being used like a pinata in this situation.”

RedWave Press

2,631,181 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 LMFAO! Iran just went full DELUSIONAL mode They now reportedly view the standoff with President Trump as a competition of “endurance” And Iran thinks THEY have the upper hand in that fight 🤡 “Iran sees this as a game of endurance. They believe that time is on their side and that ultimately the domestic pressure, when it comes to energy markets and the stock market, will force President Trump to make a deal that's in their favor.” “That is not the truth. That is not the reality." "The president and his counterparts in Israel have the ability to continue this operation for MONTHS if they need to." — Trey Yingst
0:38

🚨 LMFAO! Iran just went full DELUSIONAL mode They now reportedly view the standoff with President Trump as a competition of “endurance” And Iran thinks THEY have the upper hand in that fight 🤡 “Iran sees this as a game of endurance. They believe that time is on their side and that ultimately the domestic pressure, when it comes to energy markets and the stock market, will force President Trump to make a deal that's in their favor.” “That is not the truth. That is not the reality." "The president and his counterparts in Israel have the ability to continue this operation for MONTHS if they need to." — Trey Yingst

Eric Daugherty

79,872 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

✨ hasanabi has a message for the centrist Democrats and the consultants who spend more time attacking the left instead of Trump: "In this day and age, right now, if you are literally spending all of your resources attacking the left-flank instead of attacking Trump, then you are pro-Trump because that's precisely what the Republicans are leaning into. Republicans want to cause division in the ranks. Republicans want to make it seem as though the Democrats are not united. Republicans want to do everything in their power to drive a wedge between left forces/the DSA and centrist Democrats who want to protect their corporate sponsorships and want to protect their comfortable sinecures. That is exactly what's going on. The base will not fall for it. I don't believe that the base will fall for it.
1:30

✨ hasanabi has a message for the centrist Democrats and the consultants who spend more time attacking the left instead of Trump: "In this day and age, right now, if you are literally spending all of your resources attacking the left-flank instead of attacking Trump, then you are pro-Trump because that's precisely what the Republicans are leaning into. Republicans want to cause division in the ranks. Republicans want to make it seem as though the Democrats are not united. Republicans want to do everything in their power to drive a wedge between left forces/the DSA and centrist Democrats who want to protect their corporate sponsorships and want to protect their comfortable sinecures. That is exactly what's going on. The base will not fall for it. I don't believe that the base will fall for it.

adri ♡

26,094 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

It hurts that Democrats were unable to force Trump to fix Obamacare. But Democrats still got more out of this shutdown than any prior shutdown, going back decades. The sad truth is that most government closures DO end with proponents of the shutdown coming up short regarding their demands. (In fact: name ONE shutdown in the past 30 years where the shutdown proponents got everything they wanted — or even something CLOSE to what they wanted. Go ahead. Ask chat. I‘ll wait.) So we didn’t win on the POLICY of fixing premiums. (At least, not yet. That may not happen until after the midterms, unfortunately.) But we did win on the POLITICS. We centered skyrocketing healthcare costs as a major issue. And Democrats made the GOP own the pain of higher premiums. That’s not nothing. The GOP now is firmly on the wrong side of an 80/20 issue. That’s cold comfort for the people whose premiums are going up. But the Republicans proved they don’t CARE very much about the pain of the American people — shutdown or no shutdown. Trump and the GOP proved they were willing to let planes fall from the sky, American children starve and federal workers get evicted from their homes— rather than find a way for you to see a doctor. That level of callousness put liberals in a bind. At some point Democrats were going to have to decide how many actual, HUMAN LIVES — federal workers, airline passengers, hungry children— they were willing to risk to make Trump look bad. Because the hope of forcing Trump to save Obama subsidies were fading fast. I wish Democrats could have won more with this one tactic. But at least we advanced the process of fixing healthcare. And while most Americans will be grateful to have fully functioning airports for Thanksgiving, they wont forget which party refused to take their health costs seriously. No, that’s not everything. But it’s sure not nothing.
1:09

It hurts that Democrats were unable to force Trump to fix Obamacare. But Democrats still got more out of this shutdown than any prior shutdown, going back decades. The sad truth is that most government closures DO end with proponents of the shutdown coming up short regarding their demands. (In fact: name ONE shutdown in the past 30 years where the shutdown proponents got everything they wanted — or even something CLOSE to what they wanted. Go ahead. Ask chat. I‘ll wait.) So we didn’t win on the POLICY of fixing premiums. (At least, not yet. That may not happen until after the midterms, unfortunately.) But we did win on the POLITICS. We centered skyrocketing healthcare costs as a major issue. And Democrats made the GOP own the pain of higher premiums. That’s not nothing. The GOP now is firmly on the wrong side of an 80/20 issue. That’s cold comfort for the people whose premiums are going up. But the Republicans proved they don’t CARE very much about the pain of the American people — shutdown or no shutdown. Trump and the GOP proved they were willing to let planes fall from the sky, American children starve and federal workers get evicted from their homes— rather than find a way for you to see a doctor. That level of callousness put liberals in a bind. At some point Democrats were going to have to decide how many actual, HUMAN LIVES — federal workers, airline passengers, hungry children— they were willing to risk to make Trump look bad. Because the hope of forcing Trump to save Obama subsidies were fading fast. I wish Democrats could have won more with this one tactic. But at least we advanced the process of fixing healthcare. And while most Americans will be grateful to have fully functioning airports for Thanksgiving, they wont forget which party refused to take their health costs seriously. No, that’s not everything. But it’s sure not nothing.

Van Jones

78,184 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Scott Jennings sets off a LAND MINE on the CNN panel when he says the United States has spent MORE money on Somali fraud than on the entire Iran conflict. Abby Phillip tried to throw President Trump under the bus — and it blew up in her face. PHILLIP: “That is Donald Trump. That’s what some people voted for because they wanted him to spend money here instead of $11 billion dropping bombs elsewhere in the world.” JENNINGS: “I mean, I’m sorry Abby, but we’ve spent more money in this country on Somali fraud in Minnesota than we’ve spent on this war so far.” “You keep throwing around $11 billion.” “$19 billion dollars, Abby!” PHILLIP: “It’s not $19 billion! By no estimate…by no estimates is it $19 billion.” JENNINGS: “You seem to be worried about this $11 billion but not TBD billion in Minnesota!”
1:03

Scott Jennings sets off a LAND MINE on the CNN panel when he says the United States has spent MORE money on Somali fraud than on the entire Iran conflict. Abby Phillip tried to throw President Trump under the bus — and it blew up in her face. PHILLIP: “That is Donald Trump. That’s what some people voted for because they wanted him to spend money here instead of $11 billion dropping bombs elsewhere in the world.” JENNINGS: “I mean, I’m sorry Abby, but we’ve spent more money in this country on Somali fraud in Minnesota than we’ve spent on this war so far.” “You keep throwing around $11 billion.” “$19 billion dollars, Abby!” PHILLIP: “It’s not $19 billion! By no estimate…by no estimates is it $19 billion.” JENNINGS: “You seem to be worried about this $11 billion but not TBD billion in Minnesota!”

Overton

592,783 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Non-SNP members and supporters did not donate to a ring-fenced referendum fund so that their money could quietly slide into the SNP’s general coffers as “part of the resources available” to the party. They gave it with a clear, explicit understanding: this was ring-fenced for one purpose a future independence referendum campaign. It was not a general top-up for party running costs, salaries, legal bills, or day-to-day politics. That distinction was not a vague suggestion; it was the entire basis on which many ordinary people reached into their pockets. And now that money is gone. Not “reallocated.” Not “spent in good faith.” Simply gone despite the explicit terms on which it was raised. That is not creative accounting or a technical breach. It is a fundamental breach of trust with thousands of donors who believed they were funding a democratic campaign, not subsidising a political party’s general operations. The SNP took money given in good faith under a specific, restricted purpose and treated it as a flexible slush fund. When the referendum never materialised and the money disappeared, the public and donors were left with neither the campaign nor the cash. That demands answers, not euphemisms.
4:00

Non-SNP members and supporters did not donate to a ring-fenced referendum fund so that their money could quietly slide into the SNP’s general coffers as “part of the resources available” to the party. They gave it with a clear, explicit understanding: this was ring-fenced for one purpose a future independence referendum campaign. It was not a general top-up for party running costs, salaries, legal bills, or day-to-day politics. That distinction was not a vague suggestion; it was the entire basis on which many ordinary people reached into their pockets. And now that money is gone. Not “reallocated.” Not “spent in good faith.” Simply gone despite the explicit terms on which it was raised. That is not creative accounting or a technical breach. It is a fundamental breach of trust with thousands of donors who believed they were funding a democratic campaign, not subsidising a political party’s general operations. The SNP took money given in good faith under a specific, restricted purpose and treated it as a flexible slush fund. When the referendum never materialised and the money disappeared, the public and donors were left with neither the campaign nor the cash. That demands answers, not euphemisms.

Gerry

20,895 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

How is it that Democrats looked at files at the Treasury Department a year ago under the Biden Administration that showed a massive amount of wire transfers going into Epstein’s bank account, yet none of those Democrats chose to investigate those transfers? How is that possible? And … how is it that only now is it important for them to know about these transfers. You’d think they would have been concerned that maybe Trump had given Epstein money, yet they didn’t investigate when they had the chance. Odd right? During the Biden Administration Democrats literally had all the control they needed yet no investigations happened. Ghislane Maxwell was tried and found guilty during Biden’s reign of indifference. Someone got a judge to seal all the pertinent information and to date this judge has refused to unseal the info. But now, when they are secure in knowing no names will be released have they crawled out of their black hole to demand answers under the Trump Administration. So they can suggest that Republicans are hiding the truth when it’s their judge that won’t release the files. It’s a simple answer, Democrats are hypocrites. Like it or not. Just like the current shutdown people are suffering through. Dems want the illegals in our country covered for healthcare. Republicans want the illegals sent back to their own countries, therefore we wouldn’t have to cover their healthcare. Dems can tell us this isn’t true all they want but as Speaker Johnson has pointed out numerous times, their requests are there in writing. Dems want to fund all the items taken out in the Big Beautiful Bill. A bill they voted for. It was ok to take those people off healthcare (that would be our tax dollars) but now they want to hold the government hostage to get it back. Democrats are willing to punish American citizens to provide for illegals that SHOULD NOT BE HERE. DEPORT THEM ALL.
2:35

How is it that Democrats looked at files at the Treasury Department a year ago under the Biden Administration that showed a massive amount of wire transfers going into Epstein’s bank account, yet none of those Democrats chose to investigate those transfers? How is that possible? And … how is it that only now is it important for them to know about these transfers. You’d think they would have been concerned that maybe Trump had given Epstein money, yet they didn’t investigate when they had the chance. Odd right? During the Biden Administration Democrats literally had all the control they needed yet no investigations happened. Ghislane Maxwell was tried and found guilty during Biden’s reign of indifference. Someone got a judge to seal all the pertinent information and to date this judge has refused to unseal the info. But now, when they are secure in knowing no names will be released have they crawled out of their black hole to demand answers under the Trump Administration. So they can suggest that Republicans are hiding the truth when it’s their judge that won’t release the files. It’s a simple answer, Democrats are hypocrites. Like it or not. Just like the current shutdown people are suffering through. Dems want the illegals in our country covered for healthcare. Republicans want the illegals sent back to their own countries, therefore we wouldn’t have to cover their healthcare. Dems can tell us this isn’t true all they want but as Speaker Johnson has pointed out numerous times, their requests are there in writing. Dems want to fund all the items taken out in the Big Beautiful Bill. A bill they voted for. It was ok to take those people off healthcare (that would be our tax dollars) but now they want to hold the government hostage to get it back. Democrats are willing to punish American citizens to provide for illegals that SHOULD NOT BE HERE. DEPORT THEM ALL.

MAGA PATRIOT TGM (TERI)

429,245 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Scott Jennings just flipped the script on a frantic attorney who tried to spin the Epstein emails as a Trump scandal. Stacy Schneider insisted the release was somehow devastating for Trump — but Scott Jennings didn’t let that fantasy survive more than a few seconds. SCHNEIDER: “His connections to Epstein, as shown in those emails, according to Epstein, is unsavory. And it’s not good for him.” Jennings fired back with a series of hammer blows to her entire narrative: JENNINGS: “Is that new information that he knew Jeffrey Epstein?” “Is it new information that Trump excommunicated him from Mar-a-Lago?” Then he dropped the real headline: “The only new information that we got this week of those emails was that somebody from the New York Times was advising Jeffrey Epstein, and we learned tonight from the Washington Post that Jeffrey Epstein was programing Democratic members of Congress.” “We didn’t learn anything we didn’t already know about Donald Trump, which was other than Jeffrey Epstein, hated Donald Trump.” “And now Democrats are aligning themselves with Jeffrey Epstein because Orange man, bad!”
0:46

Scott Jennings just flipped the script on a frantic attorney who tried to spin the Epstein emails as a Trump scandal. Stacy Schneider insisted the release was somehow devastating for Trump — but Scott Jennings didn’t let that fantasy survive more than a few seconds. SCHNEIDER: “His connections to Epstein, as shown in those emails, according to Epstein, is unsavory. And it’s not good for him.” Jennings fired back with a series of hammer blows to her entire narrative: JENNINGS: “Is that new information that he knew Jeffrey Epstein?” “Is it new information that Trump excommunicated him from Mar-a-Lago?” Then he dropped the real headline: “The only new information that we got this week of those emails was that somebody from the New York Times was advising Jeffrey Epstein, and we learned tonight from the Washington Post that Jeffrey Epstein was programing Democratic members of Congress.” “We didn’t learn anything we didn’t already know about Donald Trump, which was other than Jeffrey Epstein, hated Donald Trump.” “And now Democrats are aligning themselves with Jeffrey Epstein because Orange man, bad!”

Overton

390,122 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

TEHRAN’S TACTICS: Senior regional intelligence source indicates that Iran is betting on a game of "endurance," banking on market meltdowns and domestic distress to force President Trump into a deal. Trey Yingst: "Iran sees this as a game of endurance. They believe that time is on their side and that ultimately the domestic pressure, when it comes to energy markets and the stock market, will force President Trump to make a deal that's in their favor. That is not the truth. That is not the reality." "The president and his counterparts in Israel have the ability to continue this operation for months if they need to."
0:38

TEHRAN’S TACTICS: Senior regional intelligence source indicates that Iran is betting on a game of "endurance," banking on market meltdowns and domestic distress to force President Trump into a deal. Trey Yingst: "Iran sees this as a game of endurance. They believe that time is on their side and that ultimately the domestic pressure, when it comes to energy markets and the stock market, will force President Trump to make a deal that's in their favor. That is not the truth. That is not the reality." "The president and his counterparts in Israel have the ability to continue this operation for months if they need to."

FOX & Friends

228,022 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

CNN panel gloats in laughter as Scott Jennings delivers a blunt warning to the Democratic Party. It began with Mamdani’s win, when Jennings issued this message for Chuck Schumer: “AOC is going to be the next senator from New York.” But the real warning came when he saw murder-wishing Jay Jones (D) leading the attorney general race in Virginia. “I see the energy in Virginia Democrats looking the other way on a violent candidate for attorney general who says he wants to murder Republicans and their children. If you think you’re getting rid of Graham Platner in Maine now, think again. This is a terrible night for the national Democratic image given what is happening inside their party.” Jennings pressed on: “Mamdani is an avowed socialist. It’s not what people say that he is. It’s what he says that he is. He’s now the leader of their party. That’s their energy and Chuck Schumer’s —” Anderson Cooper cut in, mocking the idea: “[Mamdani’s] the leader of the Democratic Party?” “Who is the leader? Can someone tell me?” Jennings shot back. “He’s a life raft for Republicans who have to go on TV and get their asses kicked,” David Axelrod responded with a big smile. Even as the panel laughed him off, Jennings doubled down on his warning about Mamdani and Jones: “You own this now. You all own this now.”
0:58

CNN panel gloats in laughter as Scott Jennings delivers a blunt warning to the Democratic Party. It began with Mamdani’s win, when Jennings issued this message for Chuck Schumer: “AOC is going to be the next senator from New York.” But the real warning came when he saw murder-wishing Jay Jones (D) leading the attorney general race in Virginia. “I see the energy in Virginia Democrats looking the other way on a violent candidate for attorney general who says he wants to murder Republicans and their children. If you think you’re getting rid of Graham Platner in Maine now, think again. This is a terrible night for the national Democratic image given what is happening inside their party.” Jennings pressed on: “Mamdani is an avowed socialist. It’s not what people say that he is. It’s what he says that he is. He’s now the leader of their party. That’s their energy and Chuck Schumer’s —” Anderson Cooper cut in, mocking the idea: “[Mamdani’s] the leader of the Democratic Party?” “Who is the leader? Can someone tell me?” Jennings shot back. “He’s a life raft for Republicans who have to go on TV and get their asses kicked,” David Axelrod responded with a big smile. Even as the panel laughed him off, Jennings doubled down on his warning about Mamdani and Jones: “You own this now. You all own this now.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,712,428 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten