Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This cropped view makes it much more obvious, especially if you don't know what we are looking for. It is there and it is undeniable. Intentional or not, this is providing and advantage. This is what I like to call “passive active aero” moveable surface that are designed to... show more

brakeboosted

27,639 subscribers

829,932 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Education News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Ale🏎️ | Europa League enjoyer1 year ago

The rear wing flexes but it's not even that,the damn upper flap opens creating a sort of "little DRS" which is absolutely not legal

Fede M1 year ago

All those words and all you wanted to say is: “I’m hurt”.

brakeboosted1 year ago

had to make the word count.

ΛDI1 year ago

Wow what the heck is this, how can the FIA keep quiet about this?!

Chris Koziol1 year ago

Do people really not understand that if you engineer an aerodynamic part without any sort of give, it’ll immediately shatter once it hits X amount of load….? To put it simply: wing no flex = shatter, wing flex = no shatter

brakeboosted1 year ago

You clearly don't understand what the fuss is about. Don't be afraid to ask questions!

Ashes | SOPHOMORE ERA1 year ago

Just to remind you that Lewis once gets disqualified for DRS gap too wide (0.2 mm)

Lewis1 year ago

Had people I know who’s work is callebrating the Computer aided aero machines both for f1 teams and the British military text me bout how illegal this is

Jav1 year ago

No system can be rigid.

brakeboosted1 year ago

Thank you for stating the obvious. The tips on the leading edge of the main plane are rising, it is quite literally opening the DRS to some extent.

Related Videos

Cohort retention is the one thing to know if what you made is good or not This is what it looks like when it is good

Cohort retention is the one thing to know if what you made is good or not This is what it looks like when it is good

Garry Tan

142,136 views • 2 years ago

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Russia's violation of NATO's airspace: We are a defensive alliance, yes, but we are not naïve. So we see what is happening and whether it is intentional or not. If it is not intentional, then it is blatantly incompetent. And of course, even if it is incompetence, we still have to defend ourselves.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Russia's violation of NATO's airspace: We are a defensive alliance, yes, but we are not naïve. So we see what is happening and whether it is intentional or not. If it is not intentional, then it is blatantly incompetent. And of course, even if it is incompetence, we still have to defend ourselves.

Anton Gerashchenko

217,911 views • 11 months ago

SECRETARY RUBIO: I don't know who it is. I don't know what it is. But there are things flying over our military installations, and they're not ours, and we should look into this.

SECRETARY RUBIO: I don't know who it is. I don't know what it is. But there are things flying over our military installations, and they're not ours, and we should look into this.

Department of State

433,325 views • 15 days ago

I do not understand this fantasy of making someone constantly happy. You are a grown woman. Your emotional state is your responsibility. If you need a handler to regulate your happiness, then that is your weakness, not his failure. Every time I hear the word “provider” thrown at a man, I ask the obvious question: Provide what exactly, and how much is enough? A roof? Money? Attention? Validation? Endless reassurance? At what point does it stop—or does it ever? This woman sits there waiting for a man to manufacture her happiness like he is a factory and she is entitled to the product. As if she is incapable of building a life she enjoys without outsourcing her emotional stability. She wants joy delivered on a silver platter and calls it love. That is not love. That is dependency dressed up as romance. If you cannot create your own happiness, you are not looking for a partner. You are looking for a caretaker.

I do not understand this fantasy of making someone constantly happy. You are a grown woman. Your emotional state is your responsibility. If you need a handler to regulate your happiness, then that is your weakness, not his failure. Every time I hear the word “provider” thrown at a man, I ask the obvious question: Provide what exactly, and how much is enough? A roof? Money? Attention? Validation? Endless reassurance? At what point does it stop—or does it ever? This woman sits there waiting for a man to manufacture her happiness like he is a factory and she is entitled to the product. As if she is incapable of building a life she enjoys without outsourcing her emotional stability. She wants joy delivered on a silver platter and calls it love. That is not love. That is dependency dressed up as romance. If you cannot create your own happiness, you are not looking for a partner. You are looking for a caretaker.

Larry Conger 🇺🇸

31,096 views • 5 months ago

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.

THE VOICE 🌹 🗣🎙🇺🇸🦅🌎⚓💜♠️CHRIST CONSCIOUSNESS

40,362 views • 2 months ago

This is not who we are. We must join together to call this out, to make more people understand what is happening and work to stop it.

This is not who we are. We must join together to call this out, to make more people understand what is happening and work to stop it.

Cory Booker

59,719 views • 1 year ago

Here it is...... Class XII Interceptor doing what it does. We have objects in our airspace that are intercepting commercial flights every day, all day. They do not engage because they are not a threat. i don't know what to do with this data at this point so i am publishing it. I'm hoping that someone out there on this planet knows what this is and reaches out to me to talk about what I've been observing for the last 2 years. I'm looking for funding to continue this research or to be told what is going on here.... Ross Coulthart Garry P. Nolan

Here it is...... Class XII Interceptor doing what it does. We have objects in our airspace that are intercepting commercial flights every day, all day. They do not engage because they are not a threat. i don't know what to do with this data at this point so i am publishing it. I'm hoping that someone out there on this planet knows what this is and reaches out to me to talk about what I've been observing for the last 2 years. I'm looking for funding to continue this research or to be told what is going on here.... Ross Coulthart Garry P. Nolan

ProPixel Video Analysis and Research

36,617 views • 2 months ago

If I have a plug or a hack to get a better deal or more food, would I share it online? Probably not, the chances that it would ruin it me or the company is pretty high. Especially if other locations catch on. I feel that if I shared this, what would happen is more and more people would try to take advantage of it and the store would issue a policy to stop it. What I’m conflicted about is, by ordering a taco in a bowl, I would be getting a $15 bowl for $4. Is it my fault the company has a loophole like that, or should I even feel guilty about exploiting it if it’s only for my benefit? Or is it a scenario where everything is fair game because the restaurant allows us to do that. Whose fault is it that we figured out how to get their pricier item for less? Someone else called it theft, but is this really theft if it’s allowed? They allow us to put our taco shell in a bowl. They allow us to ask for as many extras that we want. So would I really be the bad guy for taking advantage of this? I figured if this was a real issue the store would have stopped it, and to this day as far as I know, anyone can still do this. When I get a chance this week I’ll go and try to do this again to see if it still works, I’ll keep you posted.

If I have a plug or a hack to get a better deal or more food, would I share it online? Probably not, the chances that it would ruin it me or the company is pretty high. Especially if other locations catch on. I feel that if I shared this, what would happen is more and more people would try to take advantage of it and the store would issue a policy to stop it. What I’m conflicted about is, by ordering a taco in a bowl, I would be getting a $15 bowl for $4. Is it my fault the company has a loophole like that, or should I even feel guilty about exploiting it if it’s only for my benefit? Or is it a scenario where everything is fair game because the restaurant allows us to do that. Whose fault is it that we figured out how to get their pricier item for less? Someone else called it theft, but is this really theft if it’s allowed? They allow us to put our taco shell in a bowl. They allow us to ask for as many extras that we want. So would I really be the bad guy for taking advantage of this? I figured if this was a real issue the store would have stopped it, and to this day as far as I know, anyone can still do this. When I get a chance this week I’ll go and try to do this again to see if it still works, I’ll keep you posted.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

247,657 views • 2 months ago

Satoshi Roundtable is later this week. Tech Talk Tuesdays in Dubai asked me about the upcoming event: “My hope is that have for this week is that we embrace what this industry is all about. It’s not about Blackrock, or CBDCs or the filthy broken fiat system - it’s about an alternative to that. A lot of people can point to many broken things in our world. And the root of what is broken is because of the broken money system. The money system is broken. There is death and destruction because of a broken money system and what this technology represents is something different than that. It’s an alternate to that. And that’s what makes it unique and that’s what makes it valuable.”

Satoshi Roundtable is later this week. Tech Talk Tuesdays in Dubai asked me about the upcoming event: “My hope is that have for this week is that we embrace what this industry is all about. It’s not about Blackrock, or CBDCs or the filthy broken fiat system - it’s about an alternative to that. A lot of people can point to many broken things in our world. And the root of what is broken is because of the broken money system. The money system is broken. There is death and destruction because of a broken money system and what this technology represents is something different than that. It’s an alternate to that. And that’s what makes it unique and that’s what makes it valuable.”

Bruce Fenton

11,256 views • 7 months ago

This is what it means to be on the charts for 20 years. For a trader, experience is not a detail, it is the real key to success. We are not talking about indicators, magic setups or current trends, but about eye, market memory and the ability to recognise the same dynamics that repeat themselves in different forms. This video found online explains it perfectly: it makes you understand how, over time, you stop reacting to candlesticks and start reading the market's intentions. You know when there is noise, when there is distribution, when they are just looking for liquidity... and above all, you know when to do nothing. That's where the real advantage lies. The rest is just haste, ego and overtrading. Experience does not accelerate the market. It accelerates you.

This is what it means to be on the charts for 20 years. For a trader, experience is not a detail, it is the real key to success. We are not talking about indicators, magic setups or current trends, but about eye, market memory and the ability to recognise the same dynamics that repeat themselves in different forms. This video found online explains it perfectly: it makes you understand how, over time, you stop reacting to candlesticks and start reading the market's intentions. You know when there is noise, when there is distribution, when they are just looking for liquidity... and above all, you know when to do nothing. That's where the real advantage lies. The rest is just haste, ego and overtrading. Experience does not accelerate the market. It accelerates you.

EliZ

61,654 views • 8 months ago

I see patterns I know what they are doing And I don't like it. So I use it against them This is a war And we are winning

I see patterns I know what they are doing And I don't like it. So I use it against them This is a war And we are winning

The Artist known as Jess

44,647 views • 1 year ago

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna state that some UAPs and the technology is NOT made by mankind. The problem we have is that we give private companies this technology so our own elected officials can't oversee or even know what's really going on. But, some members in our government DO know and have access. How is it ok to give tech, whether created by mankind or not, to private companies so an elite group of people keep full control over it? What if it eliminates the use for gas or oil? Are you starting to understand? Also, do you believe that they wouldn't fully take advantage of this tech in multiple ways? Since we know there is a "non-human" presence, but we don't know exactly what that presence is, do you really believe they wouldn't take advantage of that, or could potentially "pose" as that "presence" and pretend it's a threat to push an agenda? These are the things you need to start asking yourself and understand that, yes, there are many elites sitting on tech and physics that they do NOT want us to have. The million dollar question becomes, "What exactly are we going to do about this, and how do we fix this for all of mankind?"

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna state that some UAPs and the technology is NOT made by mankind. The problem we have is that we give private companies this technology so our own elected officials can't oversee or even know what's really going on. But, some members in our government DO know and have access. How is it ok to give tech, whether created by mankind or not, to private companies so an elite group of people keep full control over it? What if it eliminates the use for gas or oil? Are you starting to understand? Also, do you believe that they wouldn't fully take advantage of this tech in multiple ways? Since we know there is a "non-human" presence, but we don't know exactly what that presence is, do you really believe they wouldn't take advantage of that, or could potentially "pose" as that "presence" and pretend it's a threat to push an agenda? These are the things you need to start asking yourself and understand that, yes, there are many elites sitting on tech and physics that they do NOT want us to have. The million dollar question becomes, "What exactly are we going to do about this, and how do we fix this for all of mankind?"

The SCIF

20,292 views • 6 months ago

MacFarlane: Are you concerned about the president’s mental wellbeing? Balint: 100%. I don’t know how anyone can see what he posts or watch him in any meeting and think he’s fit for office. I’m absolutely concerned about it, and I know my Republican colleagues are too—they just won’t say it out loud. There is no filter anymore. The fact that he will call a member of the press a bitch, the fact that he will call people piggy or stupid—this is not normal behavior. But we continue to normalize it by not calling it out for what it is.

MacFarlane: Are you concerned about the president’s mental wellbeing? Balint: 100%. I don’t know how anyone can see what he posts or watch him in any meeting and think he’s fit for office. I’m absolutely concerned about it, and I know my Republican colleagues are too—they just won’t say it out loud. There is no filter anymore. The fact that he will call a member of the press a bitch, the fact that he will call people piggy or stupid—this is not normal behavior. But we continue to normalize it by not calling it out for what it is.

Acyn

130,502 views • 3 months ago

I don't know if this is true or not but I find it quite interesting. What do you think?

I don't know if this is true or not but I find it quite interesting. What do you think?

Linda

123,201 views • 8 months ago

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte: NATO is still investigating whether Russian violations of NATO airspace were deliberate. "In Denmark, we are still assessing what is behind it, but when it comes to Poland and Estonia, it is clear that it is the Russians. We are assessing whether it is intentional or not, but even if it is not intentional, it is reckless and unacceptable," Mark Rutte said.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte: NATO is still investigating whether Russian violations of NATO airspace were deliberate. "In Denmark, we are still assessing what is behind it, but when it comes to Poland and Estonia, it is clear that it is the Russians. We are assessing whether it is intentional or not, but even if it is not intentional, it is reckless and unacceptable," Mark Rutte said.

Anton Gerashchenko

81,479 views • 11 months ago

Jessica: There are some key indicators that Trump and this administration knows this is going badly… We aren't getting the jobs numbers anymore, the GDP numbers or inflation numbers and we know, Donald Trump, if the number is remotely good or he can lie about it—he tells you what it is.

Jessica: There are some key indicators that Trump and this administration knows this is going badly… We aren't getting the jobs numbers anymore, the GDP numbers or inflation numbers and we know, Donald Trump, if the number is remotely good or he can lie about it—he tells you what it is.

Acyn

66,179 views • 8 months ago

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

183,443 views • 2 years ago

FOX: Talk about the art of the deal, that is what we saw working in there and whether or not this is intentional in some ways or whether or not it was an emotional outburst…

FOX: Talk about the art of the deal, that is what we saw working in there and whether or not this is intentional in some ways or whether or not it was an emotional outburst…

Acyn

272,229 views • 1 year ago

There are so many observations we can pull from this story. God is doing something greater. If we have eyes to see and ears to hear. There many distractions, what are Republicans saying? What are democrats saying? What is the media saying? What I want to find in this, is what is God saying? Shoutout to Samantha Fulnecky for speaking what needed to be said. This is accurate to the world we live in whether people acknowledge it or not. I said it before, I’ll say it again, I didn’t see a single untrue claim in her writing. #OU #Oklahoma #Education #Truth #HigherEducation

There are so many observations we can pull from this story. God is doing something greater. If we have eyes to see and ears to hear. There many distractions, what are Republicans saying? What are democrats saying? What is the media saying? What I want to find in this, is what is God saying? Shoutout to Samantha Fulnecky for speaking what needed to be said. This is accurate to the world we live in whether people acknowledge it or not. I said it before, I’ll say it again, I didn’t see a single untrue claim in her writing. #OU #Oklahoma #Education #Truth #HigherEducation

Gabe Woolley

19,436 views • 8 months ago