Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This data isn’t “racist”, it reveals an unfair system where Brits are being overlooked. The data revealed that in some London boroughs, 76% of social housing goes to foreign nationals. This isn’t just unacceptable, it’s actually scandalous.

310,893 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

MarmiteMel 💋's profile picture
MarmiteMel 💋1 year ago

There is plenty of everything to go round, without the migrants here. Sorry, but we’ve been overlooked too many times. Enough is enough

lunarush 🌶🫒's profile picture
lunarush 🌶🫒1 year ago

But surely the problem is islamophobia? 🫠

RealWorldInfo's profile picture
RealWorldInfo1 year ago

The media won’t tell you, and woke liberals are clueless: Trump’s roaring comeback is driven by everyday Americans fed up with soaring bills, not obsessed about a dozen genders or the right to a transgender bathroom. #AbookThatChangesEverything #TrumpWon

PAW (Peter)'s profile picture
PAW (Peter)1 year ago

Are Mike Jones on the case. Knockout.

Chris Rose's profile picture
Chris Rose1 year ago

@technopopulist never misses.

James Burke's profile picture
James Burke1 year ago

This has been happening for years. Recall once a mate trying to get a flat in Camden. He couldn't but they had one for a black homo from France with HIV.

Lady J 🇬🇧❤️🇺🇦🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🇺🇦's profile picture
Lady J 🇬🇧❤️🇺🇦🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🇺🇦1 year ago

Labour are just giving housing for votes! 🤦‍♀️

Lady Janny Woman's profile picture
Lady Janny Woman1 year ago

Working class Brits know their children have zero chance of ever getting even a 1-bed social housing flat and cannot afford to buy in London. Also explains why council tax is so high for those deemed actually able to pay it. What a scandal and rip off.

Chrisrando's profile picture
Chrisrando1 year ago

Also, when they say native born "British", that includes a lot of non-whites who were born in UK, right? So they are also getting unfair treatment, if I understand this correctly. So not racist.

Ubique X 🇬🇧 🇩🇪's profile picture
Ubique X 🇬🇧 🇩🇪1 year ago

Be asking next where the resentment is coming from. Give it six months.

Lego Head's profile picture
Lego Head1 year ago

The majority of those 76% were let in from the conservatives.

Related Videos

David Friedberg: Michael Burry’s Datacenter Math is Wrong “I actually think Michael Burberry's got this wrong.” “What Michael Burry is saying is that all of these hyperscalers have extended their depreciation schedule or the useful life of their data centers by roughly 2x, which cuts the operating costs in half when they report it in earnings. And so it's making their earnings inflate.” “So he's claiming they're cooking the books. Google first made this change in Q1 of 2021, where they said the servers are now going from 3 to 4 years. Separately in 2021, Google took networking equipment from 3 to 5 years. And then in 2023, they took it from 5 to 6 years.” “And so this is a result of this effort where they went in and did an analysis. So what happened?” “What happened in the data centers is that the data centers transitioned from being primarily data storage and data transfer systems, where you would use hard drives and RAM and memory to store data and then transmit it back out, to being data processing centers because of the AI boom.” “So as AI became more important in the data center, more of the dollars that are going into data centers were allocated towards chips from data storage, which initially was hard drives.” “And then suddenly, when you put these processors in to process the data to do AI, the majority of the spend and the majority of the energy is going towards the processors.” “I made some calls and I checked around with some other friends, and everyone says the same thing: that these 7-8 year old TPUs and GPUs that are sitting in the data centers are still being used and they're being used at 100% utilization.” “So that actually justifies and validates the depreciation schedule being much longer versus shorter.”

The All-In Podcast

304,297 views • 8 months ago