正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨 THIS DEVELOPER USED CLAUDE TO BUILD AN AI TRADING SYSTEM THAT MADE $847 OVERNIGHT. it all started with a single article about Polymarket bots. Claude Fable 5 read it, selected 7 GitHub repositories, connected them into a working pipeline, and deployed the entire system from start to finish....

27,836 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

An AI engineer stopped me at a coffee shop because of what was on my screen. I was running a Polymarket trading system powered by AI. He glanced over once. Then again. Then asked: "What exactly is that?" I told him: • Claude Code • Open-source tools • A few custom workflows • Less than $30/month He pulled up a chair. Then I showed him what the system was doing. Millions of trades analyzed. Thousands of wallets tracked. Every entry. Every exit. Every profitable pattern. One prompt: "Find consistently profitable traders and identify repeatable behaviors." Within minutes, the system returned a shortlist of high-performing wallets worth studying. What used to take days of manual research took minutes. But that was only the beginning. The second workflow monitored live prediction markets. It automatically filtered: • liquidity • pricing inefficiencies • volume spikes • whale activity • momentum shifts Hundreds of markets became a small watchlist. Most opportunities were rejected automatically. Only the strongest setups survived. Then he asked: "How does it know when to enter?" Three independent AI agents. One looks for arbitrage. One tracks probability convergence. One follows high-conviction traders. When multiple agents agree, confidence increases. When they disagree, no trade. Simple. But surprisingly effective. Then came the next question: "What about exits?" The system doesn't just analyze winning traders. It studies how they take profits. Many successful traders close positions long before settlement. So the bot watches for: • profit targets • unusual volume • momentum reversals The goal isn't to predict everything. It's to react faster than manual traders can. He stared at the dashboard for a few seconds and said: "This isn't just market analysis." "It's an intelligence system." And that's the shift most people are missing. AI isn't only helping people work faster. It's compressing workflows that once required entire teams into a laptop and a few prompts. The gap between individuals and institutions is shrinking. Fast. The people learning these tools today are building the edge everyone else will be chasing tomorrow. Comment "Claude" if you want the framework.

Paul Sims

12,202 次观看 • 5 天前

🚨 NO WAY… $500K profit with Clawdbot and Polymarket, all automated This is NOT bait and it’s not made up. If you trade on Polymarket, you NEED to see this. He started small, built a fully autonomous system, and scaled it into a machine generating ~$500K in profit No insider access No ties to Trump or Musk Just a developer who integrated moltbot (clawdbot) directly into Polymarket Profile → Copytrade → I reviewed his setup and ngl, it caught me off guard No hype strategies No discretionary trading No human intervention at all The entire system runs fully autonomously His FULL strategy: 1. 15-minute BTC & ETH micro arbitrage The bot trades short-duration Bitcoin and Ethereum markets with 15-minute resolution. Within these fast markets, it exploits moments where YES + NO temporarily price below $1. By integrating moltbot (clawdbot) directly into Polymarket, the system captures these gaps instantly, without prediction or bias 2. Automation over reaction When volatility spikes and emotions take over, the system executes mechanically. No hesitation, no latency, no human delay. By the time most traders react, the inefficiency is already gone 3. Scale through autonomy Each trade earns cents, not dollars. But full automation allows nonstop repetition at massive frequency, with zero fatigue Scale matters 29,256 trades executed, each insignificant on its own. Stacked together, they compounded into nearly $500K in profit Bottom line IMO, there’s a quiet bot war unfolding on Polymarket Manual traders argue setups Machines exploit structure And as long as inefficiencies exist, autonomous systems will keep printing.

Shelpid.WI3M

985,516 次观看 • 6 个月前

CLAUDE BUILT A TRADING SYSTEM ON MY MAC I gave Claude full control over my Mac and just left it running overnight No prompts, no detailed instructions – I just told it to figure out how to make money on Polymarket Then I closed the laptop and went to sleep In the morning, I opened my Mac and saw the terminal still running with logs constantly updating At first it looked like random activity, but once I scrolled through it, I realized it had actually built a structured system overnight It was already tracking wallets Ranking them by performance Filtering out the ones with random entries And focusing only on the ones with consistent behavior What surprised me the most is that it didn’t stop at analysis It organized everything into a working dashboard inside the terminal Capital, PnL, winrate – all updating in real time It even ranked wallets based on performance metrics like ROI, consistency, and execution timing This is the part I would normally spend hours building manually At that point, it was ready to trade, but not actually executing anything yet So I connected it to a Telegram copytrading bot to actually execute the trades, and just let it run Bot: Polymarket: After that, it started opening positions on its own A few hours later I checked the dashboard again Capital: $12,380 P&L: +$23,128 Winrate: 100% 48 trades executed Now I’m not even trading myself I just check the dashboard and see what it’s doing And the strange part is – it keeps getting better the longer it runs

𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗗 ⛓🧠

82,898 次观看 • 4 个月前

I asked my bot to read 20 Polymarket quant articles and build me a trading system. One week later: $600 → $20,400. The crazy part? It didn’t just copy the strategies from the articles. It found the edges the authors never mentioned. I gave Claude Opus a simple prompt: “Read these 20 quant articles. Extract every strategy. Then figure out what they’re not saying.” 48 hours later, the bot was live. The articles talked about the usual things: • basic arbitrage • weather markets • simple spreads But the bot looked deeper. It analyzed 847 trades from top wallets, cross-referenced them with article timestamps, and found something interesting: The gap between what quants publish and what they actually trade. Examples: Articles say: wait for 5% mispricing. Top wallets enter at 2.3%. Articles say: avoid volatile markets. Top wallets make 80% of their profits during volatility spikes. Articles say: start small with $100. Successful bots compound 3–6% per trade. So the system ignored the advice. And copied the behavior. Week 1 results • 127 trades executed • 71% win rate • $600 → $20,400 Biggest trade: $4,100 profit on a 15-minute BTC market Funny thing? The articles called those markets “too risky.” The bot saw 18 top wallets entering at the same time. Copytrade → What the bot actually does → scans quant articles for strategy mentions → tracks wallets belonging to the authors → compares what they write vs what they trade → trades the difference The edge isn’t reading quant articles. The edge is watching what happens after they publish them. Most people learn from what traders say. The bot learned from what they hide.

Discover

54,245 次观看 • 5 个月前