正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

This exchange says everything. A Liberal Lapdog MP is asked why the Prime Minister has missed Question Period **164 times** — including **64 times** while he was literally in Ottawa. His answer? The PM has “deep reverence for Parliament”… but he’s busy at the G7, cheering on the men’s...

JayGenXer's profile picture

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

90,898 subscribers

110,230 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Asked why Mark Carney missed Question Period dozens of times while in Ottawa, the Government House leader said the PM has a "deep reverence" for Parliament and continues to answer questions in the House every week.
2:56

Asked why Mark Carney missed Question Period dozens of times while in Ottawa, the Government House leader said the PM has a "deep reverence" for Parliament and continues to answer questions in the House every week.

Juno News

15,960 次观看 • 1 个月前

Mark Carney has attended just **21%** of Question Periods since becoming Prime Minister. Out of 124 QPs in this Parliament, he’s shown up for only **26**. For context: - Justin Trudeau attended **41%** in his first 124 QPs - Stephen Harper attended **65%** — and answered every single question on Wednesdays Carney has been out of the country **18%** of the time he’s been PM. Harper was out **15%** of the time… while managing a war in Afghanistan. And Harper still showed up far more often. This is the same guy who was sold to Canadians as the “serious,” “responsible” adult who would bring competence and accountability. Instead, he treats Parliament like an optional meeting he can skip whenever he FEELS like it. If the Prime Minister of Canada doesn’t think he needs to regularly face the House of Commons and answer for his government… WHAT does that say about how he views the people who elected him??? This isn’t leadership! This is avoidance! Video: David Akin Drop a 🔥🖕🖕 if you’re tired of a Prime Minister who hides from accountability. #cdnpoli #MarkCarney #LiberalFail #Accountability
1:54

Mark Carney has attended just **21%** of Question Periods since becoming Prime Minister. Out of 124 QPs in this Parliament, he’s shown up for only **26**. For context: - Justin Trudeau attended **41%** in his first 124 QPs - Stephen Harper attended **65%** — and answered every single question on Wednesdays Carney has been out of the country **18%** of the time he’s been PM. Harper was out **15%** of the time… while managing a war in Afghanistan. And Harper still showed up far more often. This is the same guy who was sold to Canadians as the “serious,” “responsible” adult who would bring competence and accountability. Instead, he treats Parliament like an optional meeting he can skip whenever he FEELS like it. If the Prime Minister of Canada doesn’t think he needs to regularly face the House of Commons and answer for his government… WHAT does that say about how he views the people who elected him??? This isn’t leadership! This is avoidance! Video: David Akin Drop a 🔥🖕🖕 if you’re tired of a Prime Minister who hides from accountability. #cdnpoli #MarkCarney #LiberalFail #Accountability

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

56,553 次观看 • 2 个月前

Watch and listen to this podcast between Ryan Williams 🇨🇦 | The Competition Guy and Michelle Ferreri Ryan Williams (Conservative MP for Bay of Quinte) just nailed the biggest problem in Parliament right now. Question Period is supposed to be the one hour a day where the government is forced to answer for what they’re doing to Canadians. Instead, it’s become almost useless. The Speaker won’t make the Prime Minister or ministers actually answer the question asked. They dodge, pivot to condolences, heritage months, or whatever statement they feel like giving that day. Williams put it perfectly: if they aren’t made to answer even for that single hour in a Parliament that sits 16+ hours a day, then Parliament itself stops being relevant to democracy. This didn’t start with Carney — but it’s gotten worse under him. The dodge-and-weave has become the entire strategy. We don’t need more committees or more empty words. We need a Speaker who actually enforces the rules: **Answer the damn question.** Until that happens, everything else is theatre. This clip is worth your time. The frustration is real because the erosion is real. Who else is done watching Question Period turn into a joke? 👇 #cdnpoli #QuestionPeriod #Accountability #Carney #CanadaFirst
2:29

Watch and listen to this podcast between Ryan Williams 🇨🇦 | The Competition Guy and Michelle Ferreri Ryan Williams (Conservative MP for Bay of Quinte) just nailed the biggest problem in Parliament right now. Question Period is supposed to be the one hour a day where the government is forced to answer for what they’re doing to Canadians. Instead, it’s become almost useless. The Speaker won’t make the Prime Minister or ministers actually answer the question asked. They dodge, pivot to condolences, heritage months, or whatever statement they feel like giving that day. Williams put it perfectly: if they aren’t made to answer even for that single hour in a Parliament that sits 16+ hours a day, then Parliament itself stops being relevant to democracy. This didn’t start with Carney — but it’s gotten worse under him. The dodge-and-weave has become the entire strategy. We don’t need more committees or more empty words. We need a Speaker who actually enforces the rules: **Answer the damn question.** Until that happens, everything else is theatre. This clip is worth your time. The frustration is real because the erosion is real. Who else is done watching Question Period turn into a joke? 👇 #cdnpoli #QuestionPeriod #Accountability #Carney #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

17,213 次观看 • 1 个月前

The MP of Kitchener Center Kelly DeRidder stood in the HOC and delivered an excellent speech the other day regarding our Democracy & exposing what the Liberals have been doing to get other MP’s including herself to cross the floor is not Democracy. “so when they (Canadians) see a Government attempting to reshape Parliament not through voters but through recruitment they recognize it for what it is” “you deserve transparency, you deserve accountability, & you deserve a Government that reflects the choices you made at the ballot box” Kelly DeRidder, MP deserves a lot of respect for standing up for her constituents & what she believes in.
7:07

The MP of Kitchener Center Kelly DeRidder stood in the HOC and delivered an excellent speech the other day regarding our Democracy & exposing what the Liberals have been doing to get other MP’s including herself to cross the floor is not Democracy. “so when they (Canadians) see a Government attempting to reshape Parliament not through voters but through recruitment they recognize it for what it is” “you deserve transparency, you deserve accountability, & you deserve a Government that reflects the choices you made at the ballot box” Kelly DeRidder, MP deserves a lot of respect for standing up for her constituents & what she believes in.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

14,255 次观看 • 3 个月前

A worker challenged Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a visit to Sault Ste. Marie ON, expressing his disbelief in Trudeau's claims. The worker explained that despite having a good job, he struggles to make ends meet. During the trip PM made no announcements and refused to answer media questions. The worker stated, "I don't believe you for a second" & "You're doing nothing for us, Justin." This guy, and all Canadians, deserve better.
1:20

A worker challenged Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a visit to Sault Ste. Marie ON, expressing his disbelief in Trudeau's claims. The worker explained that despite having a good job, he struggles to make ends meet. During the trip PM made no announcements and refused to answer media questions. The worker stated, "I don't believe you for a second" & "You're doing nothing for us, Justin." This guy, and all Canadians, deserve better.

Damien C. Kurek

105,464 次观看 • 1 年前

In the House yesterday, Poilievre asked a number of valid questions of the Prime Minister that the press seems to have ignored. Despite being in Ottawa, the Prime Minister skipped Question Period "For all the Prime Minister's negotiating skills and State's craft, what really do we have to show a year after?" - "What do we really know about the Prime Minister's plan to get tariffs lifted with the U.S. what really do we know?" "Is it still his negotiating bottom line to have those tariffs removed? And if so, what is he planning to offer in exchange for getting them lifted? We don't know." - "If he does intend to renew CUSMA, does he intend to try and get it renewed exactly as it is, with small changes or a complete overhaul? "Has anybody heard him answer that question?" "When was the last serious negotiation?" "Has he or anyone in his cabinet actually been at the negotiating table in the last four months?" - "On the one hand, he says that the reason we have the only shrinking economy in the G7 is because the tariffs are so bad." "On the other, he says there's no need to rush into solving this problem because the deal is so good." - "Mr. Speaker, we all have to ask, how long will this Prime Minister use the trade dispute and other foreign matters as a convenient all purpose excuse for causing inflation, debt and joblessness here at home." Pierre Poilievre
5:07

In the House yesterday, Poilievre asked a number of valid questions of the Prime Minister that the press seems to have ignored. Despite being in Ottawa, the Prime Minister skipped Question Period "For all the Prime Minister's negotiating skills and State's craft, what really do we have to show a year after?" - "What do we really know about the Prime Minister's plan to get tariffs lifted with the U.S. what really do we know?" "Is it still his negotiating bottom line to have those tariffs removed? And if so, what is he planning to offer in exchange for getting them lifted? We don't know." - "If he does intend to renew CUSMA, does he intend to try and get it renewed exactly as it is, with small changes or a complete overhaul? "Has anybody heard him answer that question?" "When was the last serious negotiation?" "Has he or anyone in his cabinet actually been at the negotiating table in the last four months?" - "On the one hand, he says that the reason we have the only shrinking economy in the G7 is because the tariffs are so bad." "On the other, he says there's no need to rush into solving this problem because the deal is so good." - "Mr. Speaker, we all have to ask, how long will this Prime Minister use the trade dispute and other foreign matters as a convenient all purpose excuse for causing inflation, debt and joblessness here at home." Pierre Poilievre

cbcwatcher

33,131 次观看 • 4 个月前

I asked a Labour Minister what the cost to the British taxpayer is of housing migrants in HMOs. Once again the Government refuses to answer. Probably because they don’t know. This evasion of democratic accountability cannot continue. I will be stepping up pressure on the Prime Minister directly over the summer to answer this question and will publish all correspondence here.
0:46

I asked a Labour Minister what the cost to the British taxpayer is of housing migrants in HMOs. Once again the Government refuses to answer. Probably because they don’t know. This evasion of democratic accountability cannot continue. I will be stepping up pressure on the Prime Minister directly over the summer to answer this question and will publish all correspondence here.

Sarah Pochin MP

128,666 次观看 • 1 年前

VIDEO | Delhi: On PM Narendra Modi's address to the nation, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "I heard the Prime Minister's speech just now, and I was wondering whether the Prime Minister is speaking as Prime Minister or the leader of the BJP in Parliament. Behind the Prime Minister was the national flag, and he was speaking as Prime Minister of India while an election is going on. This is a new low in the politics of India. But I know that neither the Chief Election Commissioner nor any other institution will do anything about it..." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
1:52

VIDEO | Delhi: On PM Narendra Modi's address to the nation, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "I heard the Prime Minister's speech just now, and I was wondering whether the Prime Minister is speaking as Prime Minister or the leader of the BJP in Parliament. Behind the Prime Minister was the national flag, and he was speaking as Prime Minister of India while an election is going on. This is a new low in the politics of India. But I know that neither the Chief Election Commissioner nor any other institution will do anything about it..." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

322,150 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Congress party uplifted the Sikh community and made a Sikh the Prime Minister. But when Narendra Modi was asked about Muslims killed in the Gujarat riots, he compared Muslims to puppies. Today, Himanta Biswa Sarma openly calls for the economic boycott of the Muslim community. The 1962 war was discussed in Parliament and Atal Bihari Vajpayee was present during that debate. In contrast, the Modi government has never allowed a discussion on China and Galwan. Now we know why. General Narwane has written that when he asked for orders, he was told to decide for himself. This is the truth Modi is scared of.
1:28

The Congress party uplifted the Sikh community and made a Sikh the Prime Minister. But when Narendra Modi was asked about Muslims killed in the Gujarat riots, he compared Muslims to puppies. Today, Himanta Biswa Sarma openly calls for the economic boycott of the Muslim community. The 1962 war was discussed in Parliament and Atal Bihari Vajpayee was present during that debate. In contrast, the Modi government has never allowed a discussion on China and Galwan. Now we know why. General Narwane has written that when he asked for orders, he was told to decide for himself. This is the truth Modi is scared of.

Dr. Shama Mohamed

10,425 次观看 • 6 个月前

Ginny Roth "The Prime Minister loved the politics of playing tough during election campaign." "But now that he actually has to come up with a deal that doesn't work for him... He has to compromise." "But I think he eroded that position when he was doing all that theater for all those many, many months in the lead up to becoming Prime Minister and then ultimately through the and that now that he's since Prime Minister and I think that's going to be the point that Poilievre is going to try to make is you can't have it both ways." "You can't say your elbows up, get the political theater, get the political benefit, and then also be the person that's compromising" Marieke Walsh "The Prime Minister's office has not done a lot of groundwork laying in terms of setting expectations for Canadians in terms of the concessions and the possibility for pain as part of this deal." Ginny Roth Marieke Walsh
3:15

Ginny Roth "The Prime Minister loved the politics of playing tough during election campaign." "But now that he actually has to come up with a deal that doesn't work for him... He has to compromise." "But I think he eroded that position when he was doing all that theater for all those many, many months in the lead up to becoming Prime Minister and then ultimately through the and that now that he's since Prime Minister and I think that's going to be the point that Poilievre is going to try to make is you can't have it both ways." "You can't say your elbows up, get the political theater, get the political benefit, and then also be the person that's compromising" Marieke Walsh "The Prime Minister's office has not done a lot of groundwork laying in terms of setting expectations for Canadians in terms of the concessions and the possibility for pain as part of this deal." Ginny Roth Marieke Walsh

cbcwatcher

77,450 次观看 • 5 天前

Adam Chambers "If you look at even the government's now new fiscal anchor, which is I think the deficit to the GDP, if they're in the downside scenario, that fiscal anchor is likely broken." "And you'll recall the last fiscal anchor, the debt to GDP ratio is now actually, they said was supposed to go down every year, is actually going up every year for the next three years." "And frankly if Prime Minister Trudeau was still the Prime Minister today, running deficits this size, I don't think we would be saying that he has moved to the right." Adam Chambers
9:02

Adam Chambers "If you look at even the government's now new fiscal anchor, which is I think the deficit to the GDP, if they're in the downside scenario, that fiscal anchor is likely broken." "And you'll recall the last fiscal anchor, the debt to GDP ratio is now actually, they said was supposed to go down every year, is actually going up every year for the next three years." "And frankly if Prime Minister Trudeau was still the Prime Minister today, running deficits this size, I don't think we would be saying that he has moved to the right." Adam Chambers

cbcwatcher

19,435 次观看 • 3 个月前

Ottawa — Well, that didn’t take long. In what can only be described as a public humiliation, Conservative MP Frank Caputo (Frank Caputo) dismantled Trudeau’s Public Safety Minister, Gary Anandasangaree, in a fiery parliamentary showdown that laid bare the rot at the heart of the Liberal government’s so-called border and public safety agenda. “The Globe and Mail reported 600 people are missing. You’re the minister. You’re expected to know this. The buck stops with you.” That was Caputo’s opening shot and the Minister never recovered. Now, for context: those 600 people are foreign nationals who were ordered deported from Canada — 70 percent of them violent criminals, including sex offenders. That’s not a rounding error. That’s a national disgrace. So Caputo asked the obvious question: Where are they? What did Minister Anandasangaree say? Nothing. He filibustered. He squirmed. He muttered something about “unprecedented removals.” Caputo cut through it instantly: “Do you know where they are — yes or no?” Still nothing. Then came the TikTok moment... literally. When Caputo pressed the Minister on the 1,000 border agents the Liberals promised but never hired, the Minister sneered, “I’m not here for your TikTok videos.” Excuse me? TikTok! The Chinese spyware app banned on government phones, is now a Liberal talking point? Caputo didn’t blink: “TikTok is banned. I don’t have an account. I’m here for Canadians. I’m here for answers.” It got worse. The Minister admitted, under pressure, that the RCMP haven’t hired a single one of the 1,000 officers they promised, despite a spike in violent crime across the country. Caputo’s response: “Okay, that’s a zero, I take it then.” Then Caputo dropped the hammer. He played the leaked audio... audio where Minister Anandasangaree admits the Liberal gun buyback scheme is a political stunt that won’t work. His words: “Don’t ask me to explain the logic to you. I’m not an expert on this.” And now he wants Canadians to believe the program is going “great” in Cape Breton, where, shocker, a Liberal MP’s brother-in-law just happens to be involved. When Caputo asked if the Minister spoke to that chief directly, Anandasangaree dodged again, reciting talking points from the Mass Casualty Commission like a robot. Caputo wasn’t having it: “He doesn’t get to talk out the clock… He has to speak to the questions he’s given. And I won’t stand for this.” And he didn’t. What happened in that committee room was simple: a government caught lying, stalling, and hiding, and one MP willing to call them out. Caputo exposed the truth: Carneys hand-picked “public safety” minister doesn’t know where violent criminals are, hasn’t hired a single new cop, and is overseeing a disarmament program he doesn’t even believe in — all while claiming it’s for “our safety.” This is the Liberal Party in 2025: globalist talking points, zero accountability, and a minister who can’t answer basic questions. But don’t worry — they’re watching your bank account and planning new laws to censor you online.
8:29

Ottawa — Well, that didn’t take long. In what can only be described as a public humiliation, Conservative MP Frank Caputo (Frank Caputo) dismantled Trudeau’s Public Safety Minister, Gary Anandasangaree, in a fiery parliamentary showdown that laid bare the rot at the heart of the Liberal government’s so-called border and public safety agenda. “The Globe and Mail reported 600 people are missing. You’re the minister. You’re expected to know this. The buck stops with you.” That was Caputo’s opening shot and the Minister never recovered. Now, for context: those 600 people are foreign nationals who were ordered deported from Canada — 70 percent of them violent criminals, including sex offenders. That’s not a rounding error. That’s a national disgrace. So Caputo asked the obvious question: Where are they? What did Minister Anandasangaree say? Nothing. He filibustered. He squirmed. He muttered something about “unprecedented removals.” Caputo cut through it instantly: “Do you know where they are — yes or no?” Still nothing. Then came the TikTok moment... literally. When Caputo pressed the Minister on the 1,000 border agents the Liberals promised but never hired, the Minister sneered, “I’m not here for your TikTok videos.” Excuse me? TikTok! The Chinese spyware app banned on government phones, is now a Liberal talking point? Caputo didn’t blink: “TikTok is banned. I don’t have an account. I’m here for Canadians. I’m here for answers.” It got worse. The Minister admitted, under pressure, that the RCMP haven’t hired a single one of the 1,000 officers they promised, despite a spike in violent crime across the country. Caputo’s response: “Okay, that’s a zero, I take it then.” Then Caputo dropped the hammer. He played the leaked audio... audio where Minister Anandasangaree admits the Liberal gun buyback scheme is a political stunt that won’t work. His words: “Don’t ask me to explain the logic to you. I’m not an expert on this.” And now he wants Canadians to believe the program is going “great” in Cape Breton, where, shocker, a Liberal MP’s brother-in-law just happens to be involved. When Caputo asked if the Minister spoke to that chief directly, Anandasangaree dodged again, reciting talking points from the Mass Casualty Commission like a robot. Caputo wasn’t having it: “He doesn’t get to talk out the clock… He has to speak to the questions he’s given. And I won’t stand for this.” And he didn’t. What happened in that committee room was simple: a government caught lying, stalling, and hiding, and one MP willing to call them out. Caputo exposed the truth: Carneys hand-picked “public safety” minister doesn’t know where violent criminals are, hasn’t hired a single new cop, and is overseeing a disarmament program he doesn’t even believe in — all while claiming it’s for “our safety.” This is the Liberal Party in 2025: globalist talking points, zero accountability, and a minister who can’t answer basic questions. But don’t worry — they’re watching your bank account and planning new laws to censor you online.

Dan Knight

59,758 次观看 • 10 个月前

This is what Prime Minister’s Questions actually looks like when the gloves come off. Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre went head-to-head in the House today, and the sparks were flying. Carney tried the usual “economics professor” routine about deficits and his central bank record. Poilievre hammered him on the gas tax, printing money, and the cost-of-living crisis crushing Canadians. The exchange is going viral for a reason... it’s raw, unfiltered, and shows exactly why so many Canadians are tuning back in. One side is still playing the old Ottawa game. The other is speaking like a normal person who actually feels the pain at the pump.
1:27

This is what Prime Minister’s Questions actually looks like when the gloves come off. Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre went head-to-head in the House today, and the sparks were flying. Carney tried the usual “economics professor” routine about deficits and his central bank record. Poilievre hammered him on the gas tax, printing money, and the cost-of-living crisis crushing Canadians. The exchange is going viral for a reason... it’s raw, unfiltered, and shows exactly why so many Canadians are tuning back in. One side is still playing the old Ottawa game. The other is speaking like a normal person who actually feels the pain at the pump.

The Shift Has Hit The Fan

74,156 次观看 • 3 个月前

Pune, Maharashtra: Political analyst and consultant Tehseen Poonawalla says, "The Chief Minister of Assam has alleged that a Member of Parliament is a Pakistani agent and that he and his wife are helping Pakistan. My question to him is this: that MP sits in Parliament, alongside the Prime Minister and the Home Minister. Just a short distance away sits the National Security Advisor, Ajit Doval. Did none of them know that this MP was allegedly a Pakistani agent?..."
1:12

Pune, Maharashtra: Political analyst and consultant Tehseen Poonawalla says, "The Chief Minister of Assam has alleged that a Member of Parliament is a Pakistani agent and that he and his wife are helping Pakistan. My question to him is this: that MP sits in Parliament, alongside the Prime Minister and the Home Minister. Just a short distance away sits the National Security Advisor, Ajit Doval. Did none of them know that this MP was allegedly a Pakistani agent?..."

IANS

105,880 次观看 • 6 个月前

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha
2:46

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

Congress

45,738 次观看 • 8 个月前

Trump was asked, "The Pope has called your immigration actions inhumane. Do you take that seriously?" His answer was, "I mean, maybe he has. He also didn't like the wall, they didn't like the wall. You know, I built a wall. And I didn't put up the wall. I built the wall, the wall, nobody talks about that, you know." HIs answer shows America has a leader who doesn't know how to answer a question anymore. He is not qualified for the job, actually he never was. It is time for Trump to go. Like right now! #DemsUnited
0:28

Trump was asked, "The Pope has called your immigration actions inhumane. Do you take that seriously?" His answer was, "I mean, maybe he has. He also didn't like the wall, they didn't like the wall. You know, I built a wall. And I didn't put up the wall. I built the wall, the wall, nobody talks about that, you know." HIs answer shows America has a leader who doesn't know how to answer a question anymore. He is not qualified for the job, actually he never was. It is time for Trump to go. Like right now! #DemsUnited

Feisty is proud to be a Democrat!

730,874 次观看 • 8 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi: On the statement of the Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal AP Singh, Congress leader Shama Mohamed says, "What the Air Chief Marshal has said that we have shot down five Pakistani jets is a matter of great joy. Whatever he said, we respect and honour him for that. Operation Sindoor was discussed in Parliament. Why was this not said in Parliament before? Why is it being said suddenly today? And secondly, why did we do a ceasefire? When we were ahead, we were shooting down their jets. Why this sudden ceasefire? This is our question. The Prime Minister will have to answer this. Amit Shah said that we will take back PoK. We are saying take back PoK today, but why did you do the ceasefire? This is what we are saying about the political will..."
2:34

#WATCH | Delhi: On the statement of the Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal AP Singh, Congress leader Shama Mohamed says, "What the Air Chief Marshal has said that we have shot down five Pakistani jets is a matter of great joy. Whatever he said, we respect and honour him for that. Operation Sindoor was discussed in Parliament. Why was this not said in Parliament before? Why is it being said suddenly today? And secondly, why did we do a ceasefire? When we were ahead, we were shooting down their jets. Why this sudden ceasefire? This is our question. The Prime Minister will have to answer this. Amit Shah said that we will take back PoK. We are saying take back PoK today, but why did you do the ceasefire? This is what we are saying about the political will..."

ANI

421,487 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 May 31, 2026 — and a Liberal Environment Minister is STILL blaming Stephen Harper for slow approvals on major projects. Harper? The guy gone since 2015? Conservative MP Branden Leslie drops the perfect line: “What year is it?” Liberals have been in power for over 11 YEARS. They wrote the rules. They own the delays. Yet here they are, still pointing at Harper like it’s 2014. The deflection is next-level embarrassing. Drop a 🤦🏻‍♂️ if you’re done with the excuses. #cdnpoli #LiberalFail #MarkCarney #ProjectDelays #WhatYearIsIt
0:55

🚨 May 31, 2026 — and a Liberal Environment Minister is STILL blaming Stephen Harper for slow approvals on major projects. Harper? The guy gone since 2015? Conservative MP Branden Leslie drops the perfect line: “What year is it?” Liberals have been in power for over 11 YEARS. They wrote the rules. They own the delays. Yet here they are, still pointing at Harper like it’s 2014. The deflection is next-level embarrassing. Drop a 🤦🏻‍♂️ if you’re done with the excuses. #cdnpoli #LiberalFail #MarkCarney #ProjectDelays #WhatYearIsIt

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

44,521 次观看 • 2 个月前