Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

THIS GENERATION MAY BE THE FIRST TO GROW UP THINKING HUMANOID ROBOTS ARE NORMAL. And that's a much bigger deal than it sounds. Look at the adults. Phones out. Cameras recording. Everyone watching the machine because it's unusual. Now look at the kid. He just interacts with it. That's...

Yuuki_Bodisan's profile picture

Mag1strY0da

1,325 subscribers

132,747 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

THE FIRST GENERATION TO GROW UP WITH HUMANOID ROBOTS IS ALREADY HERE. And that could matter more than any robot demo. Look at this scene. A humanoid standing outside a school. Children walking around it. Watching it. Interacting with it. For adults, a machine like this still looks futuristic. For a child growing up around them? It could eventually look completely normal. Think about how quickly that changes a market. A generation ago, having a computer inside your home was unusual. Then children grew up with computers. The same happened with smartphones. Then tablets. Then AI. Technology stops feeling revolutionary when an entire generation has never known a world without it. Humanoids could be next. Imagine children growing up seeing robots in schools. Stores. Airports. Hospitals. Hotels. Homes. They won’t ask whether humans should interact with robots. They’ll already be doing it. And that matters economically. Because one of the biggest barriers to consumer robotics isn’t just price. It’s trust. People need to feel comfortable allowing an autonomous machine into their personal space. Inside their homes. Around their families. Around their children. That kind of acceptance can take years. Sometimes generations. But children who grow up around humanoids won’t need the same adjustment. To them, asking a robot to carry something might feel as normal as asking Alexa a question feels today. And once that happens, the addressable market changes dramatically. A robot isn’t just industrial equipment anymore. It becomes a household product. A service platform. An assistant. Potentially even something families upgrade every few years. First robot at school. First robot at the mall. First robot at work. Eventually… first robot at home. The companies building humanoids today aren’t only competing for today’s customers. They may be competing to become familiar to an entire generation of future customers. Because the biggest sign that humanoid robots have won won’t be people staring at them. It’ll be children walking past one without thinking twice.
0:10

THE FIRST GENERATION TO GROW UP WITH HUMANOID ROBOTS IS ALREADY HERE. And that could matter more than any robot demo. Look at this scene. A humanoid standing outside a school. Children walking around it. Watching it. Interacting with it. For adults, a machine like this still looks futuristic. For a child growing up around them? It could eventually look completely normal. Think about how quickly that changes a market. A generation ago, having a computer inside your home was unusual. Then children grew up with computers. The same happened with smartphones. Then tablets. Then AI. Technology stops feeling revolutionary when an entire generation has never known a world without it. Humanoids could be next. Imagine children growing up seeing robots in schools. Stores. Airports. Hospitals. Hotels. Homes. They won’t ask whether humans should interact with robots. They’ll already be doing it. And that matters economically. Because one of the biggest barriers to consumer robotics isn’t just price. It’s trust. People need to feel comfortable allowing an autonomous machine into their personal space. Inside their homes. Around their families. Around their children. That kind of acceptance can take years. Sometimes generations. But children who grow up around humanoids won’t need the same adjustment. To them, asking a robot to carry something might feel as normal as asking Alexa a question feels today. And once that happens, the addressable market changes dramatically. A robot isn’t just industrial equipment anymore. It becomes a household product. A service platform. An assistant. Potentially even something families upgrade every few years. First robot at school. First robot at the mall. First robot at work. Eventually… first robot at home. The companies building humanoids today aren’t only competing for today’s customers. They may be competing to become familiar to an entire generation of future customers. Because the biggest sign that humanoid robots have won won’t be people staring at them. It’ll be children walking past one without thinking twice.

Mag1strY0da

10,134 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

THE $20,000 HOME ROBOT DOESN'T NEED TO BE WORTH $20,000 ON DAY ONE. That's the part people miss. Look at this task. Laundry. Today the robot learns to sort it. Tomorrow it learns to fold it. Then: Load the washer. Empty the dishwasher. Clean the bathroom. Make the bed. Take out the trash. Same hardware. More value. That's fundamentally different from almost every appliance in your house. Your washing machine doesn't wake up tomorrow knowing how to clean the kitchen. A general-purpose robot potentially can. Imagine buying a humanoid for $20,000. At purchase it can reliably perform 10 useful tasks. A year later: 30. Three years later: 100. The machine physically sitting in your house hasn't changed. The economic value of what it can do has. That's why software could completely change the economics of humanoid ownership. We normally expect hardware to depreciate. Humanoids could become one of the strange products where the hardware gets older... while the worker inside it keeps getting better. That's a very powerful business model.
0:10

THE $20,000 HOME ROBOT DOESN'T NEED TO BE WORTH $20,000 ON DAY ONE. That's the part people miss. Look at this task. Laundry. Today the robot learns to sort it. Tomorrow it learns to fold it. Then: Load the washer. Empty the dishwasher. Clean the bathroom. Make the bed. Take out the trash. Same hardware. More value. That's fundamentally different from almost every appliance in your house. Your washing machine doesn't wake up tomorrow knowing how to clean the kitchen. A general-purpose robot potentially can. Imagine buying a humanoid for $20,000. At purchase it can reliably perform 10 useful tasks. A year later: 30. Three years later: 100. The machine physically sitting in your house hasn't changed. The economic value of what it can do has. That's why software could completely change the economics of humanoid ownership. We normally expect hardware to depreciate. Humanoids could become one of the strange products where the hardware gets older... while the worker inside it keeps getting better. That's a very powerful business model.

Mag1strY0da

41,785 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

HUMANOID ROBOTS ARE STARTING TO WALK AMONG US At first, this looks like a completely normal street video. A woman is walking down the sidewalk on a sunny day, with people, stores and traffic around her. Then you notice who’s walking beside her. A humanoid robot. There’s no robotics conference, no laboratory and no team of engineers around it. The robot is simply walking through the city next to her as if this is already part of everyday life. Until recently, humanoid robots were mostly something we saw in controlled demonstrations, factories and tech presentations. Now they’re beginning to appear in ordinary public spaces, walking alongside people without looking completely out of place. The biggest shift isn’t just how advanced these machines are becoming. It’s how quickly they’re starting to blend into the real world. At this pace, seeing a humanoid robot walking next to you in public might soon stop feeling unusual at all
0:10

HUMANOID ROBOTS ARE STARTING TO WALK AMONG US At first, this looks like a completely normal street video. A woman is walking down the sidewalk on a sunny day, with people, stores and traffic around her. Then you notice who’s walking beside her. A humanoid robot. There’s no robotics conference, no laboratory and no team of engineers around it. The robot is simply walking through the city next to her as if this is already part of everyday life. Until recently, humanoid robots were mostly something we saw in controlled demonstrations, factories and tech presentations. Now they’re beginning to appear in ordinary public spaces, walking alongside people without looking completely out of place. The biggest shift isn’t just how advanced these machines are becoming. It’s how quickly they’re starting to blend into the real world. At this pace, seeing a humanoid robot walking next to you in public might soon stop feeling unusual at all

Inspector

73,410 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

In the future, it might just be humanoid robots doing the refueling!🤖⛽️ Sinopec plans to introduce humanoid robot workers across its gas stations. They will handle tasks like fueling, picking up items, restocking, and inspections,working alongside human staff, especially during peak holiday periods in China to ease service pressure. With more than 30,000 gas stations across the country (most of them equipped with convenience stores), this implies a deployment of at least 30,000 humanoid robots. The robot is a wheeled humanoid developed by Beijing-based company FIVEAGES.
0:16

In the future, it might just be humanoid robots doing the refueling!🤖⛽️ Sinopec plans to introduce humanoid robot workers across its gas stations. They will handle tasks like fueling, picking up items, restocking, and inspections,working alongside human staff, especially during peak holiday periods in China to ease service pressure. With more than 30,000 gas stations across the country (most of them equipped with convenience stores), this implies a deployment of at least 30,000 humanoid robots. The robot is a wheeled humanoid developed by Beijing-based company FIVEAGES.

CyberRobo

23,536 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

I posted this on tiktok and got hit with a flood of "this didn't happen" or "you wanted it/liked it". Brother no one is out here wanting people to yell at them on the street. Go walk up to someone like a human being. It's 2024, grow up.
0:10

I posted this on tiktok and got hit with a flood of "this didn't happen" or "you wanted it/liked it". Brother no one is out here wanting people to yell at them on the street. Go walk up to someone like a human being. It's 2024, grow up.

Endra

32,760 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

⚠️ THE WEIRDEST PART OF THIS ROBOT DEMO? NOBODY SEEMS SURPRISED ANYMORE! Humanoid robots are moving through a crowded public space while people walk around them like they're just another part of the environment. There’s no empty laboratory, no isolated testing area and no perfect path marked on the floor — just machines and humans sharing the same space. That makes this feel less like a robot demonstration and more like a preview of everyday life. Getting one humanoid to walk is one problem. Getting several machines to move safely around unpredictable people is another, because humans constantly stop, turn, cross paths and change direction without warning. Every movement requires the robots to perceive what is happening around them, maintain balance and continuously adjust their path. That's the shift worth paying attention to. The milestone isn't simply that robots can walk among humans — it's that we're starting to see environments where they can actually belong. Once that becomes reliable enough for shopping centers, airports, factories and offices, the question stops being whether humanoids can enter our world. It becomes what we're going to ask them to do once they're here.
0:12

⚠️ THE WEIRDEST PART OF THIS ROBOT DEMO? NOBODY SEEMS SURPRISED ANYMORE! Humanoid robots are moving through a crowded public space while people walk around them like they're just another part of the environment. There’s no empty laboratory, no isolated testing area and no perfect path marked on the floor — just machines and humans sharing the same space. That makes this feel less like a robot demonstration and more like a preview of everyday life. Getting one humanoid to walk is one problem. Getting several machines to move safely around unpredictable people is another, because humans constantly stop, turn, cross paths and change direction without warning. Every movement requires the robots to perceive what is happening around them, maintain balance and continuously adjust their path. That's the shift worth paying attention to. The milestone isn't simply that robots can walk among humans — it's that we're starting to see environments where they can actually belong. Once that becomes reliable enough for shopping centers, airports, factories and offices, the question stops being whether humanoids can enter our world. It becomes what we're going to ask them to do once they're here.

Future Memo

35,742 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 THIS IS HOW IT STARTS — HUMANOID ROBOT SUDDENLY LUNGES AT A MAN — EXACTLY THE MOMENT PEOPLE FEARED A humanoid robot was casually kicking a soccer ball around during a public demonstration. Then the ball rolled toward a man in the audience. He tried to kick it back. That’s when the robot suddenly charged toward him and raised its arm like it was about to swing. Within seconds, a handler rushed in and grabbed the robot before the moment escalated. People in the room laugh nervously… but the clip is making the rounds online for one reason: The movement looks almost human. The way it runs. The stance. The arm coming up. Even the comments are losing it: • “Tf was it going to HIT for???” • “Why did it need to be held back?” • “DON’T TOUCH MY BALL” • “How do they get pissed off if they supposedly don’t have emotions?” The strangest part? The robot seemed to react the instant the human interfered with the ball. Are we just watching a glitch during a demo… or the exact moment people warned about?
0:16

🚨 THIS IS HOW IT STARTS — HUMANOID ROBOT SUDDENLY LUNGES AT A MAN — EXACTLY THE MOMENT PEOPLE FEARED A humanoid robot was casually kicking a soccer ball around during a public demonstration. Then the ball rolled toward a man in the audience. He tried to kick it back. That’s when the robot suddenly charged toward him and raised its arm like it was about to swing. Within seconds, a handler rushed in and grabbed the robot before the moment escalated. People in the room laugh nervously… but the clip is making the rounds online for one reason: The movement looks almost human. The way it runs. The stance. The arm coming up. Even the comments are losing it: • “Tf was it going to HIT for???” • “Why did it need to be held back?” • “DON’T TOUCH MY BALL” • “How do they get pissed off if they supposedly don’t have emotions?” The strangest part? The robot seemed to react the instant the human interfered with the ball. Are we just watching a glitch during a demo… or the exact moment people warned about?

HustleBitch

54,191 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🇩🇪 OPTIMUS IS OUT HERE SERVING POPCORN AT A BERLIN CHRISTMAS MARKET The future showed up and it's handing out snacks. Tesla's humanoid robot working the holiday crowd, giving visitors popcorn like it's the most normal thing in the world. Kids are probably losing their minds. Adults are probably pretending they're not equally amazed. Elon said Optimus would be the future of the company. Most people imagined factory floors and warehouse work. Nobody had "charming Christmas market employee" on their bingo card. This is how you introduce robots to the world. Not with fear and dystopian warnings. With popcorn and holiday vibes. One day these things will be everywhere. But right now, one of them is working a Christmas market in Germany and honestly that's kind of beautiful. Source: Elon Musk / EFIEBER / TeslaNerd DE
0:13

🇩🇪 OPTIMUS IS OUT HERE SERVING POPCORN AT A BERLIN CHRISTMAS MARKET The future showed up and it's handing out snacks. Tesla's humanoid robot working the holiday crowd, giving visitors popcorn like it's the most normal thing in the world. Kids are probably losing their minds. Adults are probably pretending they're not equally amazed. Elon said Optimus would be the future of the company. Most people imagined factory floors and warehouse work. Nobody had "charming Christmas market employee" on their bingo card. This is how you introduce robots to the world. Not with fear and dystopian warnings. With popcorn and holiday vibes. One day these things will be everywhere. But right now, one of them is working a Christmas market in Germany and honestly that's kind of beautiful. Source: Elon Musk / EFIEBER / TeslaNerd DE

Mario Nawfal

55,638 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

This runner at first was caught in a pick off move by the pitcher. Pitcher throws to first and the first baseman fires to second and the umpire calls him out. He looked safe on the play. However, the umpire admits he was safe but said he called him out because the other team was losing 10-0 in the first inning. He said “he was so safe but I just gave it to them.” Basically saying we gotta’ get the game moving right? Fellow umpires, some coaches and parents said they respect the call and why. But many people said you are cheating that one runner by calling him out. They said no matter the score you have to have integrity even if it is 20-0. They said this is why kids grow up disliking umpires and why parents act the way they do. Tough one- I actually understand where he is coming from but if that were your kid, would you want him called out? I say call the game the right way 100% and let it play out the way it is supposed to. How is the other team supposed to get better if you are giving them calls? Do you agree with the umpire and why he did it? Or, are you totally against that and that should never happen?
0:18

This runner at first was caught in a pick off move by the pitcher. Pitcher throws to first and the first baseman fires to second and the umpire calls him out. He looked safe on the play. However, the umpire admits he was safe but said he called him out because the other team was losing 10-0 in the first inning. He said “he was so safe but I just gave it to them.” Basically saying we gotta’ get the game moving right? Fellow umpires, some coaches and parents said they respect the call and why. But many people said you are cheating that one runner by calling him out. They said no matter the score you have to have integrity even if it is 20-0. They said this is why kids grow up disliking umpires and why parents act the way they do. Tough one- I actually understand where he is coming from but if that were your kid, would you want him called out? I say call the game the right way 100% and let it play out the way it is supposed to. How is the other team supposed to get better if you are giving them calls? Do you agree with the umpire and why he did it? Or, are you totally against that and that should never happen?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

44,470 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

I spent a month in Shenzhen visiting factories and robotics companies, and the contrast with the U.S. was striking. While Figure and Boston Dynamics hide their humanoids behind closed doors, Chinese companies have massive showrooms open to the public. But what really stood out wasn't just the transparency, it was how good they are at selling. Take UBTech: they've already sold 1,200 humanoid units at $200k each to factories. And here's the kicker, these robots aren't even that useful yet. They can only pick up and drop boxes at 1/10th the speed of a human, and factories still need to hire system integrators to train them for specific tasks. My theory is that these factories are terrified of getting left behind in the robotics/AI wave. They're investing in new tech not because it's ready, but because they can't afford to wait. The second surprise was the breadth of their robotics portfolio. These companies aren't just building humanoids, they're deploying service robots everywhere: restaurants, hotels, apartments. Consumer robots are cleaning houses, pools, pet waste, dishes. They're covering the entire spectrum. But the education piece shocked me most. I picked up what I thought was a high school or college robotics textbook, it was for primary school. The government mandated AI and robotics education starting in elementary school. Almost every single school in China now has AI and robotics curriculum, complete with education robots so kids can learn by building. They're creating a generation that grows up fluent in robotics and AI. China owns the supply chain and the hardware stack. But here's what I think people are missing: the race isn't just about who can build robots faster or cheaper. The U.S. advantage has always been in the layer between hardware and human, the interaction design, the software intelligence, the intuitive interfaces that make complex technology feel natural. China is building the physical infrastructure, but they're also learning fast. Every deployed service robot, every classroom full of kids building with education kits, every factory running humanoids, that's all data collection at scale. The window for the U.S. to establish its wedge is narrowing. It's not enough to be better at AI or software anymore. We need to be building the integration layer, the intelligence that makes physical AI actually useful, not just impressive in a showroom. Because right now, China isn't just manufacturing robots. They're manufacturing a robotics-native culture, and that might be the most defensible moat of all.
0:10

I spent a month in Shenzhen visiting factories and robotics companies, and the contrast with the U.S. was striking. While Figure and Boston Dynamics hide their humanoids behind closed doors, Chinese companies have massive showrooms open to the public. But what really stood out wasn't just the transparency, it was how good they are at selling. Take UBTech: they've already sold 1,200 humanoid units at $200k each to factories. And here's the kicker, these robots aren't even that useful yet. They can only pick up and drop boxes at 1/10th the speed of a human, and factories still need to hire system integrators to train them for specific tasks. My theory is that these factories are terrified of getting left behind in the robotics/AI wave. They're investing in new tech not because it's ready, but because they can't afford to wait. The second surprise was the breadth of their robotics portfolio. These companies aren't just building humanoids, they're deploying service robots everywhere: restaurants, hotels, apartments. Consumer robots are cleaning houses, pools, pet waste, dishes. They're covering the entire spectrum. But the education piece shocked me most. I picked up what I thought was a high school or college robotics textbook, it was for primary school. The government mandated AI and robotics education starting in elementary school. Almost every single school in China now has AI and robotics curriculum, complete with education robots so kids can learn by building. They're creating a generation that grows up fluent in robotics and AI. China owns the supply chain and the hardware stack. But here's what I think people are missing: the race isn't just about who can build robots faster or cheaper. The U.S. advantage has always been in the layer between hardware and human, the interaction design, the software intelligence, the intuitive interfaces that make complex technology feel natural. China is building the physical infrastructure, but they're also learning fast. Every deployed service robot, every classroom full of kids building with education kits, every factory running humanoids, that's all data collection at scale. The window for the U.S. to establish its wedge is narrowing. It's not enough to be better at AI or software anymore. We need to be building the integration layer, the intelligence that makes physical AI actually useful, not just impressive in a showroom. Because right now, China isn't just manufacturing robots. They're manufacturing a robotics-native culture, and that might be the most defensible moat of all.

Miyu Horiuchi

90,718 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The next manipulation tool may not live on your screen. It may stand in front of you look into your eyes and convince you that it understands. Would you rather face a humanoid robot strong enough to hurt you or one designed well enough to make you trust it? This robot copies blinking, eye contact, head movement and facial expressions to create the illusion of human presence. That may look impressive but it also opens a darker question. When a machine can look concerned appear friendly and imitate emotion people may start trusting signals that contain no real feeling no empathy and no moral responsibility. So which is more dangerous a robot with physical power or a robot that can manufacture trust? #HumanoidRobot #Robotics #AI
0:12

The next manipulation tool may not live on your screen. It may stand in front of you look into your eyes and convince you that it understands. Would you rather face a humanoid robot strong enough to hurt you or one designed well enough to make you trust it? This robot copies blinking, eye contact, head movement and facial expressions to create the illusion of human presence. That may look impressive but it also opens a darker question. When a machine can look concerned appear friendly and imitate emotion people may start trusting signals that contain no real feeling no empathy and no moral responsibility. So which is more dangerous a robot with physical power or a robot that can manufacture trust? #HumanoidRobot #Robotics #AI

Techniahqrobot | humanoid robots

11,650 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This family was at the beach. They got there early and set up in front so they could watch their kids play in the water. Then this family shows up and they set up in front of them. 🤯 There was no one to the left or the right of them. Clear as could be. 😳 A lot of people said they should have moved closer so no one could set up in front of them. But many others said if the beach was open and there was no one to the left or right of them then that is just plain rude. I always leave a little sand in front in case my kids want to play or we usually throw our boogie boards in front. I’d have been irritated and would have asked them to move. 💯 What do you think? Was it rude of the second family to take their view away and set up in front of them or is it the first family’s fault for not setting up closer so no one could be in front of them?
0:10

This family was at the beach. They got there early and set up in front so they could watch their kids play in the water. Then this family shows up and they set up in front of them. 🤯 There was no one to the left or the right of them. Clear as could be. 😳 A lot of people said they should have moved closer so no one could set up in front of them. But many others said if the beach was open and there was no one to the left or right of them then that is just plain rude. I always leave a little sand in front in case my kids want to play or we usually throw our boogie boards in front. I’d have been irritated and would have asked them to move. 💯 What do you think? Was it rude of the second family to take their view away and set up in front of them or is it the first family’s fault for not setting up closer so no one could be in front of them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

57,214 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Two girls, arms overhead all day, plastering a ceiling in perfect sync and it makes them around $12,000 a month between them, mostly from filming it. Anyone who's done overhead work knows it's the worst position in the trade — arms up, neck back, shoulders burning inside ten minutes. Most people tap out. These two do it for hours, side by side, matching each other's pace like they share a brain. That's the thing you can't look away from: not just that it's two women on a ceiling, but that they're in rhythm doing the part everyone else dreads. Here's why the pair matters more than people think. A solo worker is a clip you watch once. Two people moving in sync — no talking, just anticipating each other — is a relationship, and relationships are what turn a viewer into a follower. You're not watching a task get done. You're watching a partnership work, and that pulls people back for the next one. The money runs three ways off one phone. Their calendar stays booked because homeowners watch the finish and hire them at full rate, zero ad spend — the video sells the work. Tool and material brands pay $3 - 5k a post to get their gear in genuinely skilled hands. And views, often 5-10 million a clip, stack payouts on a phone one of them wedges on a bucket. Neither of them edits. They film the shift, hand it to AI, it grabs the tightest synced stretch, cuts it to the beat, captions, schedules. They're onto the next room before it posts. The reframe for anyone doing hard work: the part of your job that's physically brutal — the part you assume nobody wants to see — is exactly what people respect watching. Struggle that looks effortless is magnetic. Doing it in sync with someone else doubles it. Do you work with someone you're so in sync with you barely need words? Drop it below — I'm breaking the best ones down next.
0:15

Two girls, arms overhead all day, plastering a ceiling in perfect sync and it makes them around $12,000 a month between them, mostly from filming it. Anyone who's done overhead work knows it's the worst position in the trade — arms up, neck back, shoulders burning inside ten minutes. Most people tap out. These two do it for hours, side by side, matching each other's pace like they share a brain. That's the thing you can't look away from: not just that it's two women on a ceiling, but that they're in rhythm doing the part everyone else dreads. Here's why the pair matters more than people think. A solo worker is a clip you watch once. Two people moving in sync — no talking, just anticipating each other — is a relationship, and relationships are what turn a viewer into a follower. You're not watching a task get done. You're watching a partnership work, and that pulls people back for the next one. The money runs three ways off one phone. Their calendar stays booked because homeowners watch the finish and hire them at full rate, zero ad spend — the video sells the work. Tool and material brands pay $3 - 5k a post to get their gear in genuinely skilled hands. And views, often 5-10 million a clip, stack payouts on a phone one of them wedges on a bucket. Neither of them edits. They film the shift, hand it to AI, it grabs the tightest synced stretch, cuts it to the beat, captions, schedules. They're onto the next room before it posts. The reframe for anyone doing hard work: the part of your job that's physically brutal — the part you assume nobody wants to see — is exactly what people respect watching. Struggle that looks effortless is magnetic. Doing it in sync with someone else doubles it. Do you work with someone you're so in sync with you barely need words? Drop it below — I'm breaking the best ones down next.

Rich

23,632 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

THE $20,000 HUMANOID DOESN’T NEED TO REPLACE YOUR JOB. IT COULD REPLACE YOUR CHORES. Look at what the robot is doing. Cooking. It sounds like a small thing. But start adding up how much time humans spend maintaining their own lives. Cooking. Cleaning. Laundry. Dishes. Groceries. Taking out trash. Putting things away. Preparing food again tomorrow. None of these tasks individually feels expensive. But your time is. Imagine a humanoid eventually saves you just 2 hours every day. That’s 730 hours per year. Over five years? 3,650 hours. More than 152 full days of your life. Now imagine the robot costs $20,000. Ignoring electricity, maintenance, software and financing for a moment, that’s roughly $5.50 of hardware cost for every hour returned to you over those five years. And the calculation could get even more interesting. Because the robot you buy on day one may not have the same capabilities three years later. Today it cuts ingredients. Tomorrow a software update teaches it an entire recipe. Later it learns your preferences. Your kitchen. Your schedule. Your routines. Same motors. Same hands. Same physical machine. More useful labor every year. That’s fundamentally different from most appliances. A $2,000 refrigerator doesn’t suddenly learn to cook. A dishwasher doesn’t learn to clean your bathroom. An oven doesn’t start doing your laundry after a software update. But a general-purpose humanoid potentially could move between all of those tasks. That’s why comparing a home robot with one appliance misses the point. You aren’t buying a better oven. You’re buying a pair of hands that can potentially learn. And that’s where the economics of home robotics become much bigger. People spend enormous amounts of money buying convenience. Food delivery. Cleaning services. Meal preparation. Laundry services. Smart appliances. But they’re all separate expenses solving separate problems. A sufficiently capable humanoid could begin combining them into one physical platform. One purchase. One machine. Hundreds of potential skills. And thousands of hours returned over its lifetime. The killer feature of the home humanoid may not be intelligence. It may not even be cooking. It could simply be giving people their time back.
0:10

THE $20,000 HUMANOID DOESN’T NEED TO REPLACE YOUR JOB. IT COULD REPLACE YOUR CHORES. Look at what the robot is doing. Cooking. It sounds like a small thing. But start adding up how much time humans spend maintaining their own lives. Cooking. Cleaning. Laundry. Dishes. Groceries. Taking out trash. Putting things away. Preparing food again tomorrow. None of these tasks individually feels expensive. But your time is. Imagine a humanoid eventually saves you just 2 hours every day. That’s 730 hours per year. Over five years? 3,650 hours. More than 152 full days of your life. Now imagine the robot costs $20,000. Ignoring electricity, maintenance, software and financing for a moment, that’s roughly $5.50 of hardware cost for every hour returned to you over those five years. And the calculation could get even more interesting. Because the robot you buy on day one may not have the same capabilities three years later. Today it cuts ingredients. Tomorrow a software update teaches it an entire recipe. Later it learns your preferences. Your kitchen. Your schedule. Your routines. Same motors. Same hands. Same physical machine. More useful labor every year. That’s fundamentally different from most appliances. A $2,000 refrigerator doesn’t suddenly learn to cook. A dishwasher doesn’t learn to clean your bathroom. An oven doesn’t start doing your laundry after a software update. But a general-purpose humanoid potentially could move between all of those tasks. That’s why comparing a home robot with one appliance misses the point. You aren’t buying a better oven. You’re buying a pair of hands that can potentially learn. And that’s where the economics of home robotics become much bigger. People spend enormous amounts of money buying convenience. Food delivery. Cleaning services. Meal preparation. Laundry services. Smart appliances. But they’re all separate expenses solving separate problems. A sufficiently capable humanoid could begin combining them into one physical platform. One purchase. One machine. Hundreds of potential skills. And thousands of hours returned over its lifetime. The killer feature of the home humanoid may not be intelligence. It may not even be cooking. It could simply be giving people their time back.

Forem

29,827 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

46 AXES. A FULL-BODY TOUCH SYSTEM. THIS HUMANOID IS BUILT TO FEEL CONTACT, NOT JUST COPY MOVEMENT! Watch the arms rise. The movement looks simple, but the interesting part is what sits behind it: a human-shaped machine designed around more than walking or waving. Vita Robotics says its bionic humanoid uses a 46-axis motion architecture, split into 23 axes in the body and 23 in the head, giving it a much wider range of movement than a basic display robot. The company also describes a full-body flexible tactile skin system, designed to detect touch and trigger physical responses. That changes the idea of what a humanoid is supposed to do: instead of only executing a programmed gesture, it is being built to react when a person interacts with it. And that is the bigger race in robotics. Making a machine move is one challenge; making it move naturally, respond to contact and behave consistently around people is another. 46 axes are not just a spec sheet. They are 46 ways for a machine to become more expressive, more responsive and harder to distinguish from a static prop.
0:14

46 AXES. A FULL-BODY TOUCH SYSTEM. THIS HUMANOID IS BUILT TO FEEL CONTACT, NOT JUST COPY MOVEMENT! Watch the arms rise. The movement looks simple, but the interesting part is what sits behind it: a human-shaped machine designed around more than walking or waving. Vita Robotics says its bionic humanoid uses a 46-axis motion architecture, split into 23 axes in the body and 23 in the head, giving it a much wider range of movement than a basic display robot. The company also describes a full-body flexible tactile skin system, designed to detect touch and trigger physical responses. That changes the idea of what a humanoid is supposed to do: instead of only executing a programmed gesture, it is being built to react when a person interacts with it. And that is the bigger race in robotics. Making a machine move is one challenge; making it move naturally, respond to contact and behave consistently around people is another. 46 axes are not just a spec sheet. They are 46 ways for a machine to become more expressive, more responsive and harder to distinguish from a static prop.

Future Memo

103,306 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

62M people watched a humanoid robot set down a box at 3:14 AM and walk off the night shift. Grainy CCTV. Timestamp burned into the corner. Aisle 7, pallets stacked 4 high. The machine works for 11 seconds. Scans a label. Turns the box 90 degrees. Sets it down. Then it stops. 8 seconds of nothing. No alarm. No supervisor in frame. It turns, walks toward the bay door, and the footage cuts. 47,000 quote tweets. Most of them say the same word. Finally. Here is the part that matters. There is no aisle 7. There was no shift. Nobody clocked in that night. The clip is AI-generated end to end. The grain, the timestamp, the 3 dead pixels in the upper left corner - rendered. The security-camera look is a style prompt, maybe 12 words long. But the fantasy is doing real work. Humanoid robots already stand on plant floors - Figure's have been at BMW Spartanburg since 2024, moving sheet metal on a fixed cycle. They don't get tired. They don't get bored. They don't stop. The machine quit because the prompt said quit. That's the only shift it walks off.
0:12

62M people watched a humanoid robot set down a box at 3:14 AM and walk off the night shift. Grainy CCTV. Timestamp burned into the corner. Aisle 7, pallets stacked 4 high. The machine works for 11 seconds. Scans a label. Turns the box 90 degrees. Sets it down. Then it stops. 8 seconds of nothing. No alarm. No supervisor in frame. It turns, walks toward the bay door, and the footage cuts. 47,000 quote tweets. Most of them say the same word. Finally. Here is the part that matters. There is no aisle 7. There was no shift. Nobody clocked in that night. The clip is AI-generated end to end. The grain, the timestamp, the 3 dead pixels in the upper left corner - rendered. The security-camera look is a style prompt, maybe 12 words long. But the fantasy is doing real work. Humanoid robots already stand on plant floors - Figure's have been at BMW Spartanburg since 2024, moving sheet metal on a fixed cycle. They don't get tired. They don't get bored. They don't stop. The machine quit because the prompt said quit. That's the only shift it walks off.

HodlReaper

22,058 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

oh my heartttt 🥹 #beckysangels : what would you say to someone who's currently stuck in between something right now? becbec: i would say it's okay. i think that's just a part of life. it's a step of slowly growing one step at a time. go through it. go with whatever you feel like is the best option. it may not be the best option, but it's okay. and just enjoy every single moment because i feel like every moment passes by quickly.
0:18

oh my heartttt 🥹 #beckysangels : what would you say to someone who's currently stuck in between something right now? becbec: i would say it's okay. i think that's just a part of life. it's a step of slowly growing one step at a time. go through it. go with whatever you feel like is the best option. it may not be the best option, but it's okay. and just enjoy every single moment because i feel like every moment passes by quickly.

r

11,509 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I swear one of the clearest signs that critical thinking skills are disappearing can be found in the comment section of any recipe. I watched a woman yesterday making one of those dump-and-go crockpot meals. She chopped up ONE onion and put it in. You would have thought she’d dumped motor oil in the crockpot. “I hate onions!” “Why would you put onions in that?” “I can’t stand onions!” Okay. Nobody cares that you hate onions. Don’t put the damn onion in. The same thing happens with salads. Somebody posts what they put in theirs and here come the complaints. “I don’t like avocado.” Fine. Don’t use avocado. “I hate tomatoes.” Then leave the tomatoes out. Nobody is standing in your kitchen forcing you to put them in the bowl. When did we lose the ability to look at a recipe and think, “That sounds good, except I’ll leave out the stuff I don’t like”? A recipe isn’t a court order. It’s a suggestion. Use a little critical thinking and make the food the way YOU like it.
0:12

I swear one of the clearest signs that critical thinking skills are disappearing can be found in the comment section of any recipe. I watched a woman yesterday making one of those dump-and-go crockpot meals. She chopped up ONE onion and put it in. You would have thought she’d dumped motor oil in the crockpot. “I hate onions!” “Why would you put onions in that?” “I can’t stand onions!” Okay. Nobody cares that you hate onions. Don’t put the damn onion in. The same thing happens with salads. Somebody posts what they put in theirs and here come the complaints. “I don’t like avocado.” Fine. Don’t use avocado. “I hate tomatoes.” Then leave the tomatoes out. Nobody is standing in your kitchen forcing you to put them in the bowl. When did we lose the ability to look at a recipe and think, “That sounds good, except I’ll leave out the stuff I don’t like”? A recipe isn’t a court order. It’s a suggestion. Use a little critical thinking and make the food the way YOU like it.

USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸

46,360 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Why do we always blame other people when things go wrong? Why is it so easy to point fingers at our parents, friends, partners, or the people around us? Sometimes, before blaming others, we need to stop and ask ourselves, “Could I be part of the problem?” Maybe the opportunities are not the problem, and maybe the people around us are not the problem. Sometimes we need to look at our own decisions, habits, attitude, and choices. Taking responsibility doesn’t mean everything is our fault; it means we are brave enough to examine ourselves and discover where the error is coming from. So before you blame your parents, blame your friends, or blame the world, check yourself first. Find the mistake, correct it, learn from it, and grow. Because sometimes, the change you are waiting for outside starts with you.
0:15

Why do we always blame other people when things go wrong? Why is it so easy to point fingers at our parents, friends, partners, or the people around us? Sometimes, before blaming others, we need to stop and ask ourselves, “Could I be part of the problem?” Maybe the opportunities are not the problem, and maybe the people around us are not the problem. Sometimes we need to look at our own decisions, habits, attitude, and choices. Taking responsibility doesn’t mean everything is our fault; it means we are brave enough to examine ourselves and discover where the error is coming from. So before you blame your parents, blame your friends, or blame the world, check yourself first. Find the mistake, correct it, learn from it, and grow. Because sometimes, the change you are waiting for outside starts with you.

King Felix

21,944 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce