正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

This gentleman makes the best statement yet & too much common sense, concerning the Austin Metcalf/Karmelo Anthony encounter. It’s not about race. "I look at this situation through the lens of a father.....l cannot imagine taking my son to a soccer game or a basketball game & the end...

TheEXECUTlONER_'s profile picture

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

298,057 subscribers

193,537 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治喜剧
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

39 条评论

WingTime 的头像
WingTime1 年前

This gentleman is EXACTLY over the target! The ONLY reason that this is getting press is because it furthers the evilness of race baiting. All other times, if blacks are killed, let's say in Chicago for instance, it's just business as usual and no one says anything. Kudos to this father for speaking truth!!

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

Perfectly stated

Pam Schilaty 的头像
Pam Schilaty1 年前

Isn't it interesting that a simple rational post stating what should be a universal truth. His comments are now looked at as a bold challenge to the accepted narrative. We are supposed to accept the irrational view of what is actually wrong from beginning to end.

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

His video is the most rational I’ve seen yet

Lily 的头像
Lily1 年前

The absolute truth. Well Said 💯 How they twist it and people believe it is just ridiculous. I can’t even imagine the pain his family are going through 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

The best I’ve seen so far

SynchedLogic 的头像
SynchedLogic1 年前

I hear the pain and anger in that statement and as a father myself, I feel that deeply. No parent should ever have to bury their child after something as avoidable as a school event or a sports meet. But here’s where we have to be careful…grief can’t turn into tunnel vision. You’re framing it like it was just a “scuffle”…teenage boy stuff. But that minimizes the fear, the escalation, and the reality that a confrontation, even a push or shove, can spiral fast especially in today’s world where kids are already on edge, carrying trauma, and too many of them feel like no one’s going to protect them. If we’re going to look at this through the lens of a father, let’s look at both kids. One is dead. The other may have felt threatened or outnumbered. Was it self-m defense? I don’t know. Was it premeditated? I don’t know that either. But I do know this…teenage boys today are not growing up in the same world we did. They’re not learning how to de escalate. They’re scared. They’re angry. And some of them are bringing weapons because they think no adult has their back. The tragedy isn’t just in the death. It’s in how many ways this could’ve been prevented from better supervision, to conflict resolution, to kids not feeling like they have to defend themselves with deadly force. So no, I’m not going to justify a stabbing. But I’m not going to act like “boys being boys” explains it all either. We owe both families more honesty than that.

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

Agreed. It’s just senseless

IamF³ (Faith Family Flag) 的头像
IamF³ (Faith Family Flag)1 年前

Where are all the videos???? you can't tell me, at a high school track meet where there are hundreds of teenagers, not one single person had out their phone recording the altercation!?!?!?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

Supposedly they have some

Gabrielle Anais 的头像
Gabrielle Anais1 年前

He’s a wise & gentle man & we need many more like him to speak out!

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

100% my friend

Callous Jay 🇺🇸 的头像
Callous Jay 🇺🇸1 年前

complete bullshit Karmelo Anthony murdered Austin Metcalf because he was white. "I'm not gonna let this white boy put his hands on me" He could have just punched him in the face. He went at him like that out of hate.

🍄🇺🇸2ndHorseman🇺🇸🍄 的头像
🍄🇺🇸2ndHorseman🇺🇸🍄1 年前

He’s correct, back in the days we settled stuff with our fists if it came to that. Never did I think of pulling a knife, gun or any deadly weapon on anyone, which back then I carried in my truck. It’s getting insane.🙏🏻

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

Right. Always gotta be someone to ruin it for everyone.

🍄🇺🇸2ndHorseman🇺🇸🍄 的头像
🍄🇺🇸2ndHorseman🇺🇸🍄1 年前

Yep!!!

Jack Washington 的头像
Jack Washington1 年前

Love this guys points. We need more people like him please.

Lauderdale_AL 的头像
Lauderdale_AL1 年前

He's absolutely right black people would be screaming up and down the streets probably looting and commenting more crimes if the roles were reversed. This was a senseless crime that took someones life over nothing, absolutely nothing. There wasn't even an argument just words.

Veronica Iverson 的头像
Veronica Iverson1 年前

Agreed

ILJoeDS 的头像
ILJoeDS1 年前

@Nuked4Every1 Indeed. Well said. Putting everything else aside here just to make a point but when did it become ok to carry a weapon of any type on school property? Karmelo is wrong about everything. Period b

GHOST:ANON 的头像
GHOST:ANON1 年前

It's a travesty for both kids. Kids being exploited for politics! Sad!

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

I agree but more so a tragedy for Austin

GHOST:ANON 的头像
GHOST:ANON1 年前

Absolutely!

Kman214 的头像
Kman2141 年前

@lakemonstercl1 This man is wise beyond his years. Can we get him elected for something?

R. Chambers 的头像
R. Chambers1 年前

You are absolutely RIGHT!

VoteRonPaul2016 的头像
VoteRonPaul20161 年前

@anarcho7 Yup the whole dead thing is what makes it murder, we used to all know that

Dan Wilkinson 的头像
Dan Wilkinson1 年前

Exactly!! No reason for a knife, no justification for murdering a child!!

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

Correct- no way shape or form is it justified

ItsJustMe 的头像
ItsJustMe1 年前

He's spittin' facts.

Michael Hershey 的头像
Michael Hershey1 年前

My heart breaks for both families. This is an American tragedy where we all need to do better.

Jordan 的头像
Jordan1 年前

I would agree w/ that but we saw an adult full man get off for killin an unarmed black teen? After stalking him, ignoring a lawful order, he still got off on self defense. Americas self defense criteria is ridiculous, but if we gonna allow egregious self defense it go both ways

Aaron Williams 的头像
Aaron Williams1 年前

Best take so far.100%dead on

Elizabeth S. 的头像
Elizabeth S.1 年前

@TomTom32526190 That's because our generation was not raised to see life that way! Obummer came along, commandeered the media at some point, and bam! Everyone's racist. It's more nuanced than that, but we let them mess us up.

cam driskill 的头像
cam driskill1 年前

@deplorable4ever

caroline 的头像
caroline1 年前

My opinion is if you bring a weapon to an event (whatever the event is). You are intending to use it. I think that is why he sat in the wrong tent on purpose. The MURDERER knew exactly what he was about to do. He thought by being black he will get off with it. DEATH PENALTY ONLY

Jim 的头像
Jim1 年前

You are 100% correct thank you sir for sharing that.

Nilzam 的头像
Nilzam1 年前

Agreed.

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 的头像
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈1 年前

💯

Noah Basketball 的头像
Noah Basketball1 年前

🏀 "The kids love it. I have kids fighting over who can get here earliest to get shots off before school." – Coach Garrison When passion meets performance, Noah Backboard makes it happen. Turn practice into obsession with shot-tracking that players can’t get enough of.

相关视频

Adin Ross says the Karmelo Anthony situation is not about race "The world's going backwards man. There’s this whole Karmelo Anthony situation, it's about right and wrong, not about race" "I'll argue anyone when it comes to that. It's not a race thing. You don't bring a knife to a track meet" "The lady is wrong in that situation. People that donate to that are disgusting. I'm telling you why they're doing it. It’s because of the Karmelo Anthony situation" "It's not about race. They're dumb as f#ck"
1:37

Adin Ross says the Karmelo Anthony situation is not about race "The world's going backwards man. There’s this whole Karmelo Anthony situation, it's about right and wrong, not about race" "I'll argue anyone when it comes to that. It's not a race thing. You don't bring a knife to a track meet" "The lady is wrong in that situation. People that donate to that are disgusting. I'm telling you why they're doing it. It’s because of the Karmelo Anthony situation" "It's not about race. They're dumb as f#ck"

dank

196,800 次观看 • 3 个月前

Kennedy: There's this little game where the Democrats want the nominee to use the magic words that Trump lost the election and the nominees are understandably, in my opinion, don't want to play that game. Hunt: How is it game? It’s just what happened. Kennedy: No, it is a game. It’s a game of words. Hunt: What does it say about where we are that you think that this is a game of words. I mean, when did this get so hard? Kennedy: The Democrats have made it hard
3:00

Kennedy: There's this little game where the Democrats want the nominee to use the magic words that Trump lost the election and the nominees are understandably, in my opinion, don't want to play that game. Hunt: How is it game? It’s just what happened. Kennedy: No, it is a game. It’s a game of words. Hunt: What does it say about where we are that you think that this is a game of words. I mean, when did this get so hard? Kennedy: The Democrats have made it hard

Acyn

413,987 次观看 • 29 天前

🚨 JUST IN: Austin Metcalf's father delivered a VERY POWERFUL message straight to his son's murderer, Karmelo Anthony, after the 35-year prison sentence "You can't look me in the EYES but you can STAB my f*cking SON!" "You're going to prison. I forgave you the day it happened. I DON'T forgive what you did." "This was never about race. It is about right and wrong. My son's death destroyed the person I used to be. He does not exist anymore." — Jeff Metcalf Powerful and heartbreaking 🙏🏻
0:38

🚨 JUST IN: Austin Metcalf's father delivered a VERY POWERFUL message straight to his son's murderer, Karmelo Anthony, after the 35-year prison sentence "You can't look me in the EYES but you can STAB my f*cking SON!" "You're going to prison. I forgave you the day it happened. I DON'T forgive what you did." "This was never about race. It is about right and wrong. My son's death destroyed the person I used to be. He does not exist anymore." — Jeff Metcalf Powerful and heartbreaking 🙏🏻

Eric Daugherty

3,693,503 次观看 • 2 个月前

"What is it that draws people to killing? Because that’s the whole thing. I just had a craving… I wanted to legally kill somebody — a bad guy. Once you’re in, it’s not about hanging in there anymore — it’s about how well you integrate with the men to go do that job. From day one, they tell you — this isn’t a game. There’s nothing about it that’s a game." David Rutherford
7:35

"What is it that draws people to killing? Because that’s the whole thing. I just had a craving… I wanted to legally kill somebody — a bad guy. Once you’re in, it’s not about hanging in there anymore — it’s about how well you integrate with the men to go do that job. From day one, they tell you — this isn’t a game. There’s nothing about it that’s a game." David Rutherford

Shawn Ryan

48,641 次观看 • 11 个月前

Draymond Green says basketball is no longer a poor kid's game: “It's a rich kid's game” “I didn't learn how to do a proper individual workout till I got to college. Growing up I'm going to hoop. Where's the nearest run. Drop me off, I'll play all day. That's what we did. We hooped all day. I think there's a huge benefit to that because you just learn to see the game” “It's different when somebody just putting you in a position to tell you to do this move. How do you use your creativity? How do you learn if somebody just say do this? How do you know what your game is if you never tap into it and just figure it out” “I think there's a time and place for a trainer and I think with where the game has gone, you need those resources in order to be successful” “I feel like basketball used to be a poor man's game. Poor kids played it. We were poor. We had nothing and it was our way out. Basketball is not a poor kid's game no more. Basketball is a rich kid game” “The days of seeing LeBron James from Akron, Ohio, from a single mom, those days are numbered. Because if you don't have the resources these days, you can't make it. But that’s also why you don't see as great basketball as you did before, because there's no imagination” “Everybody's doing the same thing, playing the same way. I think a lot of that is due sometimes to having trainers. You just become a carbon copy of somebody else the trainer created”
1:33

Draymond Green says basketball is no longer a poor kid's game: “It's a rich kid's game” “I didn't learn how to do a proper individual workout till I got to college. Growing up I'm going to hoop. Where's the nearest run. Drop me off, I'll play all day. That's what we did. We hooped all day. I think there's a huge benefit to that because you just learn to see the game” “It's different when somebody just putting you in a position to tell you to do this move. How do you use your creativity? How do you learn if somebody just say do this? How do you know what your game is if you never tap into it and just figure it out” “I think there's a time and place for a trainer and I think with where the game has gone, you need those resources in order to be successful” “I feel like basketball used to be a poor man's game. Poor kids played it. We were poor. We had nothing and it was our way out. Basketball is not a poor kid's game no more. Basketball is a rich kid game” “The days of seeing LeBron James from Akron, Ohio, from a single mom, those days are numbered. Because if you don't have the resources these days, you can't make it. But that’s also why you don't see as great basketball as you did before, because there's no imagination” “Everybody's doing the same thing, playing the same way. I think a lot of that is due sometimes to having trainers. You just become a carbon copy of somebody else the trainer created”

dank

1,247,127 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna confirms Democrats KNEW THIS ENTIRE TIME the depths of s*xual allegations against Eric Swalwell And they said nothing. The media did nothing. "They KNEW about it. They did NOT report on it...I don't know about you, Jesse, but I don't have 50 staffers, let alone 50 staffers, that would come out and say that this is wrong and that you need to resign from office, right?!" "So it was clearly a pattern. And as you're seeing with some of the text messages coming out, and I think, again, with this criminal investigation, there's a lot there with him." "When he did what he decided to do, just based on the grounds of him having an inappropriate relationship with a staffer." "But now we're looking at the criminal activity. And I stand by what I said, because I saw, again, the forensics report of that video." "And if that is true, I would suggest that the Manhattan D.A. look into that." Anna Paulina Luna
0:52

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna confirms Democrats KNEW THIS ENTIRE TIME the depths of s*xual allegations against Eric Swalwell And they said nothing. The media did nothing. "They KNEW about it. They did NOT report on it...I don't know about you, Jesse, but I don't have 50 staffers, let alone 50 staffers, that would come out and say that this is wrong and that you need to resign from office, right?!" "So it was clearly a pattern. And as you're seeing with some of the text messages coming out, and I think, again, with this criminal investigation, there's a lot there with him." "When he did what he decided to do, just based on the grounds of him having an inappropriate relationship with a staffer." "But now we're looking at the criminal activity. And I stand by what I said, because I saw, again, the forensics report of that video." "And if that is true, I would suggest that the Manhattan D.A. look into that." Anna Paulina Luna

Eric Daugherty

46,841 次观看 • 4 个月前

Trump: “I watched that pass that Messi made, not knowing as much as the people in this room, but I know about sorts and I know a little bit about soccer but I watched Messi, and he was well guarded, right? And all of a sudden he is standing on the right, you understand what I'm talking about? I don't know – I just noticed it. Nobody talked about it, I just noticed it. I said, he is too well guarded by a great player. And then he moved to the right and the other player was just standing there. "And he had plenty of time. He kicked it…. You have a great player in England, who I play golf with, you know that, right?… I think they perhaps made a mistake when they made him a defensive player, what do I know about soccer?…we've got to be a little offensive, right? But no, I'm not going to call it. Look, what do I know about coaching? But that was a little unusual."
1:21

Trump: “I watched that pass that Messi made, not knowing as much as the people in this room, but I know about sorts and I know a little bit about soccer but I watched Messi, and he was well guarded, right? And all of a sudden he is standing on the right, you understand what I'm talking about? I don't know – I just noticed it. Nobody talked about it, I just noticed it. I said, he is too well guarded by a great player. And then he moved to the right and the other player was just standing there. "And he had plenty of time. He kicked it…. You have a great player in England, who I play golf with, you know that, right?… I think they perhaps made a mistake when they made him a defensive player, what do I know about soccer?…we've got to be a little offensive, right? But no, I'm not going to call it. Look, what do I know about coaching? But that was a little unusual."

Republicans against Trump

763,158 次观看 • 27 天前

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️
2:34

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,619,840 次观看 • 2 年前

Must listen. Tucker just went off on the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up and his connection to Israel on Turning Point. Absolute fire. No one is allowed to say the foreign government Epstein was connected to was Israel because we have been cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that... "And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of intel services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working? How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton School in the late seventies with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island and the largest residential…house in Manhattan? Where did all the money come from? And, no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now, no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been… somehow cowed… into…thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington where I knew and loved a number of people including one very close person who worked at CIA. That has never…prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things. Murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting US president. It's got a whole trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It doesn't make me anti American in any sense. I was born here, my family's been here for hundreds of years. I love this country, that's why I live here. So, criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater, it makes you a free person. It makes you a citizen. You're allowed to do that…because you're not a slave, you're a citizen. And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interests and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interests. That's not creepy. It shouldn't be forbidden. And yet, all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow. That that's like too naughty and forbidden. And, the effect… of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment and I'll say it, hate online. Where people feel like they can't just say, like, what the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house… You have had all this contact with the foreign government. Were you working on behalf of Mossad? Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government? By the way, every single person in Washington DC thinks that. I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that. Why? And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes. So, I think it's better just to say it right out loud. Did this happen? And of course that question has been asked to the government of Israel and their answer is, we're not going to tell you. And I think our answer should be, no no As long as we're sending you money, if you were committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know, did you do this or not?"
3:34

Must listen. Tucker just went off on the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up and his connection to Israel on Turning Point. Absolute fire. No one is allowed to say the foreign government Epstein was connected to was Israel because we have been cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that... "And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of intel services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working? How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton School in the late seventies with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island and the largest residential…house in Manhattan? Where did all the money come from? And, no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now, no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been… somehow cowed… into…thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington where I knew and loved a number of people including one very close person who worked at CIA. That has never…prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things. Murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting US president. It's got a whole trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It doesn't make me anti American in any sense. I was born here, my family's been here for hundreds of years. I love this country, that's why I live here. So, criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater, it makes you a free person. It makes you a citizen. You're allowed to do that…because you're not a slave, you're a citizen. And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interests and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interests. That's not creepy. It shouldn't be forbidden. And yet, all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow. That that's like too naughty and forbidden. And, the effect… of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment and I'll say it, hate online. Where people feel like they can't just say, like, what the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house… You have had all this contact with the foreign government. Were you working on behalf of Mossad? Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government? By the way, every single person in Washington DC thinks that. I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that. Why? And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes. So, I think it's better just to say it right out loud. Did this happen? And of course that question has been asked to the government of Israel and their answer is, we're not going to tell you. And I think our answer should be, no no As long as we're sending you money, if you were committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know, did you do this or not?"

Green Lives Matter

1,251,223 次观看 • 1 年前

Caitlin Clark on how she gets covered by the media: "I think there's just like a false characterization of who I am sometimes. And I get it like as a reporter or as a blogger, like you can write an opinion piece and that's your job and whatever. But at the same time, like you don't know me. Like we've never had a conversation. I get people have a job to do. But at the same time, like don't make accusations about my character and who I am when you don't know me. I understand this is your job and this is your profession, and this is what you get to do. And basketball is my profession, what I get to do. And the reason I play it is when I step in between the lines, I love it. And that's what's so fun about it for me is like, I get to compete. This was always my dream. And nobody should ever try to take that away from me"
0:56

Caitlin Clark on how she gets covered by the media: "I think there's just like a false characterization of who I am sometimes. And I get it like as a reporter or as a blogger, like you can write an opinion piece and that's your job and whatever. But at the same time, like you don't know me. Like we've never had a conversation. I get people have a job to do. But at the same time, like don't make accusations about my character and who I am when you don't know me. I understand this is your job and this is your profession, and this is what you get to do. And basketball is my profession, what I get to do. And the reason I play it is when I step in between the lines, I love it. And that's what's so fun about it for me is like, I get to compete. This was always my dream. And nobody should ever try to take that away from me"

Oh No He Didn't

260,949 次观看 • 20 天前

Trump: I think it’s very sad, actually. I’m surprised that it wasn’t—you know—the public wasn’t notified a long time ago, because to get to stage 9, that’s a long time. I just had my physical. You saw that. You saw the results of that particular test. I think that test is standard to pretty much anybody getting a physical—a good physical. We had the doctors at the White House and over at Walter Reed, which is a fantastic hospital, do it. I did a very complete physical, including a cognitive test. I’m proud to announce I aced it. I got them all right. You proud of me? Your husband would be proud of me for getting them all right. It’s a little risk. If I didn’t get them all right, these people would be after me. It would be not a good situation. But I think, frankly, anybody running for president should take a cognitive test. They say it’s unconstitutional, but I would say in that particular case, having a cognitive test wouldn’t be so bad. But when you take tests—medical, as a male—that test is very standard. I don’t know if it’s given to everybody, but it’s given just about. And it takes a long time to get to that situation… to get to a stage 9. I think that if you take a look, it’s the same doctor that said that Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. If it’s the same doctor, he said there was nothing wrong there. That’s been proven to be a sad situation. And the autopen is becoming a very big deal. You know, the autopen is becoming a big deal because it seems that maybe it was the president—whoever operated the autopen. But when they say that was not good, they also—you have to look and you have to say that the test was not so good either. In other words, there are things going on that the public wasn’t informed [about], and I think somebody is going to have to speak to his doctor—if it’s the same or even if it’s two separate doctors. Why wasn’t the cognitive ability—why wasn’t that discussed? And I think the doctor said he’s just fine, and it’s turned out that’s not so. It’s very dangerous… this is dangerous for our country. Look at the mess we are in. You talk about all these questions on Ukraine and Russia. That would’ve never happened, as an example, if I were president. It would’ve never happened. The other thing—you have to say: Why did it take so long? I mean, this takes a long time. It can take years to get to this level of danger. It’s a very, very sad situation. I feel very badly about it. And I think people should try and find out what happened. Because I’ll tell you, I don’t know if it had anything to do with the hospital. Walter Reed is really good. They’re some of the best doctors I’ve ever seen. I don’t even know if they were involved. But a doctor was involved in each case. Maybe it was the same doctor. And somebody is not telling the facts. That’s a big problem.
3:05

Trump: I think it’s very sad, actually. I’m surprised that it wasn’t—you know—the public wasn’t notified a long time ago, because to get to stage 9, that’s a long time. I just had my physical. You saw that. You saw the results of that particular test. I think that test is standard to pretty much anybody getting a physical—a good physical. We had the doctors at the White House and over at Walter Reed, which is a fantastic hospital, do it. I did a very complete physical, including a cognitive test. I’m proud to announce I aced it. I got them all right. You proud of me? Your husband would be proud of me for getting them all right. It’s a little risk. If I didn’t get them all right, these people would be after me. It would be not a good situation. But I think, frankly, anybody running for president should take a cognitive test. They say it’s unconstitutional, but I would say in that particular case, having a cognitive test wouldn’t be so bad. But when you take tests—medical, as a male—that test is very standard. I don’t know if it’s given to everybody, but it’s given just about. And it takes a long time to get to that situation… to get to a stage 9. I think that if you take a look, it’s the same doctor that said that Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. If it’s the same doctor, he said there was nothing wrong there. That’s been proven to be a sad situation. And the autopen is becoming a very big deal. You know, the autopen is becoming a big deal because it seems that maybe it was the president—whoever operated the autopen. But when they say that was not good, they also—you have to look and you have to say that the test was not so good either. In other words, there are things going on that the public wasn’t informed [about], and I think somebody is going to have to speak to his doctor—if it’s the same or even if it’s two separate doctors. Why wasn’t the cognitive ability—why wasn’t that discussed? And I think the doctor said he’s just fine, and it’s turned out that’s not so. It’s very dangerous… this is dangerous for our country. Look at the mess we are in. You talk about all these questions on Ukraine and Russia. That would’ve never happened, as an example, if I were president. It would’ve never happened. The other thing—you have to say: Why did it take so long? I mean, this takes a long time. It can take years to get to this level of danger. It’s a very, very sad situation. I feel very badly about it. And I think people should try and find out what happened. Because I’ll tell you, I don’t know if it had anything to do with the hospital. Walter Reed is really good. They’re some of the best doctors I’ve ever seen. I don’t even know if they were involved. But a doctor was involved in each case. Maybe it was the same doctor. And somebody is not telling the facts. That’s a big problem.

Acyn

656,690 次观看 • 1 年前

#WATCH | On L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan advocates a 90-hour work week, Mahindra Group Chairman Anand Mahindra says, "I have a huge respect for Narayan Murthy and others. So let me not get this wrong. But I have to say something. I think this debate is in the wrong direction because this debate is about the quantity of work. My point is we have to focus on the quality of work, not on the quantity of work. So it's not about 40 hours, or 70 hours or 90 hours. What output are you doing even if it's 10 hours? You can change the world in 10 hours... I have always believed that you have to have leaders and people in your company who make wise decisions and wise choices. So the question is, which kind of mindmakes the right choices and right decisions? And I think a mind that is exposed to holistic thinking, thinking that is open to inputs from around the world, that's when you'll make a good decision. If you don't spend time at home, if you're not spending time with friends, not reading, and don't have time to reflect, how will you bring the right inputs into making a decision?... I don't want it to be about quantity. Ask me what's the quality of my work. Don't ask me how many hours I work...."
4:16

#WATCH | On L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan advocates a 90-hour work week, Mahindra Group Chairman Anand Mahindra says, "I have a huge respect for Narayan Murthy and others. So let me not get this wrong. But I have to say something. I think this debate is in the wrong direction because this debate is about the quantity of work. My point is we have to focus on the quality of work, not on the quantity of work. So it's not about 40 hours, or 70 hours or 90 hours. What output are you doing even if it's 10 hours? You can change the world in 10 hours... I have always believed that you have to have leaders and people in your company who make wise decisions and wise choices. So the question is, which kind of mindmakes the right choices and right decisions? And I think a mind that is exposed to holistic thinking, thinking that is open to inputs from around the world, that's when you'll make a good decision. If you don't spend time at home, if you're not spending time with friends, not reading, and don't have time to reflect, how will you bring the right inputs into making a decision?... I don't want it to be about quantity. Ask me what's the quality of my work. Don't ask me how many hours I work...."

ANI

102,689 次观看 • 1 年前

If I have a plug or a hack to get a better deal or more food, would I share it online? Probably not, the chances that it would ruin it me or the company is pretty high. Especially if other locations catch on. I feel that if I shared this, what would happen is more and more people would try to take advantage of it and the store would issue a policy to stop it. What I’m conflicted about is, by ordering a taco in a bowl, I would be getting a $15 bowl for $4. Is it my fault the company has a loophole like that, or should I even feel guilty about exploiting it if it’s only for my benefit? Or is it a scenario where everything is fair game because the restaurant allows us to do that. Whose fault is it that we figured out how to get their pricier item for less? Someone else called it theft, but is this really theft if it’s allowed? They allow us to put our taco shell in a bowl. They allow us to ask for as many extras that we want. So would I really be the bad guy for taking advantage of this? I figured if this was a real issue the store would have stopped it, and to this day as far as I know, anyone can still do this. When I get a chance this week I’ll go and try to do this again to see if it still works, I’ll keep you posted.
2:59

If I have a plug or a hack to get a better deal or more food, would I share it online? Probably not, the chances that it would ruin it me or the company is pretty high. Especially if other locations catch on. I feel that if I shared this, what would happen is more and more people would try to take advantage of it and the store would issue a policy to stop it. What I’m conflicted about is, by ordering a taco in a bowl, I would be getting a $15 bowl for $4. Is it my fault the company has a loophole like that, or should I even feel guilty about exploiting it if it’s only for my benefit? Or is it a scenario where everything is fair game because the restaurant allows us to do that. Whose fault is it that we figured out how to get their pricier item for less? Someone else called it theft, but is this really theft if it’s allowed? They allow us to put our taco shell in a bowl. They allow us to ask for as many extras that we want. So would I really be the bad guy for taking advantage of this? I figured if this was a real issue the store would have stopped it, and to this day as far as I know, anyone can still do this. When I get a chance this week I’ll go and try to do this again to see if it still works, I’ll keep you posted.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

247,400 次观看 • 2 个月前

Rafa Nadal & Roger Federer were asked how they want to be remembered in a new campaign for Louis Vuitton Rafa: “At the end what will make me feel proud and happy is when I leave this world, if the tournament directors, the people who work at the tournaments, staff, ATP, say good things about who I was on the tour, or who I am as a person more than a tennis player. Because as a tennis player, at the end, we have the titles, we have the achievements and that's how it is. I achieved more than what I ever dreamed of. So for me at the end, the legacy in terms of a human being, after achieving all the things that we achieved, for me is the most important thing.” ❤️ Roger: “I hope if I'm remembered not only as a tennis player, but as a person behind what I gave to the game and what I represented to the game, and it was less about all my Wimbledon victories or whatever it was, that would mean a lot to me. If I can be remembered more as the personality rather than just a player, that would be great. And if I was a good role model for kids, that would make me happy too… And it would be nice, like Rafa said, if the people are happy to see us again. Not like ‘oh no, that guy again,’” 😂 These two. 🥹
1:27

Rafa Nadal & Roger Federer were asked how they want to be remembered in a new campaign for Louis Vuitton Rafa: “At the end what will make me feel proud and happy is when I leave this world, if the tournament directors, the people who work at the tournaments, staff, ATP, say good things about who I was on the tour, or who I am as a person more than a tennis player. Because as a tennis player, at the end, we have the titles, we have the achievements and that's how it is. I achieved more than what I ever dreamed of. So for me at the end, the legacy in terms of a human being, after achieving all the things that we achieved, for me is the most important thing.” ❤️ Roger: “I hope if I'm remembered not only as a tennis player, but as a person behind what I gave to the game and what I represented to the game, and it was less about all my Wimbledon victories or whatever it was, that would mean a lot to me. If I can be remembered more as the personality rather than just a player, that would be great. And if I was a good role model for kids, that would make me happy too… And it would be nice, like Rafa said, if the people are happy to see us again. Not like ‘oh no, that guy again,’” 😂 These two. 🥹

The Tennis Letter

525,823 次观看 • 2 年前

"No matter how good you think you are, no matter what you think you bring to the table, there is someone else waiting in the wings to take your spot. ... I'm from that cloth where I worked really hard to get this spot, and I'm not trying to lose it. I worked my a** off." - G a b r i e l - I g l e s i a s
1:04

"No matter how good you think you are, no matter what you think you bring to the table, there is someone else waiting in the wings to take your spot. ... I'm from that cloth where I worked really hard to get this spot, and I'm not trying to lose it. I worked my a** off." - G a b r i e l - I g l e s i a s

Club Shay Shay

39,555 次观看 • 5 个月前

Rest in peace Jim goad. Gavin McInnes check out the debate, that clip was at the end after he kept accusing me of shit that everyone knew was false. It got to a point where it was just watching a man unravel. But him saying that to you that I was right about him abandoning his kid is good. Everyone fucks up, it’s about facing it. I don’t believe this life is the end, and we all die. What’s even worse than a bad dad is one that denies it. Him saying that speaks very highly of him in his final days and I hope he is at peace. Boomers have a heavy weight. They were psy op’d into a permanent infancy. I don’t know what it would be like to be a boomer, and I’m grateful I don’t have to know. Much love Full debate
2:05

Rest in peace Jim goad. Gavin McInnes check out the debate, that clip was at the end after he kept accusing me of shit that everyone knew was false. It got to a point where it was just watching a man unravel. But him saying that to you that I was right about him abandoning his kid is good. Everyone fucks up, it’s about facing it. I don’t believe this life is the end, and we all die. What’s even worse than a bad dad is one that denies it. Him saying that speaks very highly of him in his final days and I hope he is at peace. Boomers have a heavy weight. They were psy op’d into a permanent infancy. I don’t know what it would be like to be a boomer, and I’m grateful I don’t have to know. Much love Full debate

Owen Benjamin 🐻

39,470 次观看 • 22 天前

Robert De Niro originally wanted to play Max Cherry in Jackie Brown, the role that eventually went to Robert Forster. However, Quentin Tarantino had written the role with Forster in mind and had already promised him the part. Tarantino explains… “I wrote Jackie Brown, and I decided at some point in writing the script that Robert Forster would be terrific as Max Cherry. So, while I’m still writing the script, I bump into Robert Forster - we go to the same coffee shop. ….so I decided I’m gonna give him the part, because I figure, look, this would be a big, big deal part. So if I don’t give him the part, then once I’m done with it and it gets out in the town, then it’s gonna be Gene Hackman and Paul Newman and people like that, and it would be pretty hard to say no to. But if I just give him the part right now, I’ve got the juice to get it through, and now I can’t take it back because I wouldn’t be a man of my word. So to lock myself into that decision, I give it to him before I finish writing it. And then now comes the time to do it. Robert De Niro reads it, and he wants to be in it, but he wants to play Max. And I go, “Well, look, you would be a fantastic Max, but I’ve already given that to Robert Forster, and I’m a man of my word. I can’t take it back.” Now, De Niro is very much a man of his word, so he understands that. He gets that. And he’s just like, “Yeah, yeah. That’s just disappointing. It’s just regretful.” I go, “What?” “Well, just because, you know, you were thinking about him, so you wrote it for him. But if we had had more dinners and hung out a little bit more, then you would have been thinking about me and you would have written it for me. And I understand what happened, but that could have been changed if we had spent more time with each other before this.” And so he kind of gives me the – “just think about it for a couple of days, all right? - and then let’s talk again. Maybe Bob (Robert Foster) could play Louis, the other guy.” So then I actually have Bob read Louis with me, and then read Max. And if that could work, maybe that could work. But no, everything that made him perfect for Max made him wrong for Louis. And so I get on the phone with De Niro — and I go, “Yeah, you know, I explored that. But no, everything about him that makes him perfect for Max makes him wrong to play this ex-convict guy.” And he goes, “Yeah, yeah, I get that. I get that, I get that, I get that. Okay, so tell me about this Louis character.” And I go, “You would consider playing Louis?” “Yeah, it’s a good character. It’s a good movie. I wanna be part of it. It’s a good character. I wanted the other character, but yeah, this is a good character. I’d be happy to play it.” I go, “Well, you didn’t let me know that before.” He goes, “Well, I didn’t wanna let you off the hook. I wanted you on the hook. But now if that ship has sailed, then let’s talk about Louis.” And then it was a done deal.”
5:57

Robert De Niro originally wanted to play Max Cherry in Jackie Brown, the role that eventually went to Robert Forster. However, Quentin Tarantino had written the role with Forster in mind and had already promised him the part. Tarantino explains… “I wrote Jackie Brown, and I decided at some point in writing the script that Robert Forster would be terrific as Max Cherry. So, while I’m still writing the script, I bump into Robert Forster - we go to the same coffee shop. ….so I decided I’m gonna give him the part, because I figure, look, this would be a big, big deal part. So if I don’t give him the part, then once I’m done with it and it gets out in the town, then it’s gonna be Gene Hackman and Paul Newman and people like that, and it would be pretty hard to say no to. But if I just give him the part right now, I’ve got the juice to get it through, and now I can’t take it back because I wouldn’t be a man of my word. So to lock myself into that decision, I give it to him before I finish writing it. And then now comes the time to do it. Robert De Niro reads it, and he wants to be in it, but he wants to play Max. And I go, “Well, look, you would be a fantastic Max, but I’ve already given that to Robert Forster, and I’m a man of my word. I can’t take it back.” Now, De Niro is very much a man of his word, so he understands that. He gets that. And he’s just like, “Yeah, yeah. That’s just disappointing. It’s just regretful.” I go, “What?” “Well, just because, you know, you were thinking about him, so you wrote it for him. But if we had had more dinners and hung out a little bit more, then you would have been thinking about me and you would have written it for me. And I understand what happened, but that could have been changed if we had spent more time with each other before this.” And so he kind of gives me the – “just think about it for a couple of days, all right? - and then let’s talk again. Maybe Bob (Robert Foster) could play Louis, the other guy.” So then I actually have Bob read Louis with me, and then read Max. And if that could work, maybe that could work. But no, everything that made him perfect for Max made him wrong for Louis. And so I get on the phone with De Niro — and I go, “Yeah, you know, I explored that. But no, everything about him that makes him perfect for Max makes him wrong to play this ex-convict guy.” And he goes, “Yeah, yeah, I get that. I get that, I get that, I get that. Okay, so tell me about this Louis character.” And I go, “You would consider playing Louis?” “Yeah, it’s a good character. It’s a good movie. I wanna be part of it. It’s a good character. I wanted the other character, but yeah, this is a good character. I’d be happy to play it.” I go, “Well, you didn’t let me know that before.” He goes, “Well, I didn’t wanna let you off the hook. I wanted you on the hook. But now if that ship has sailed, then let’s talk about Louis.” And then it was a done deal.”

Gangster Cinema Central

89,214 次观看 • 1 个月前

The People Of America Have Been Deceived. They’ve Been Cheated & As A Result Our Country & World Is Now In Turmoil. It all Started With A Fake Barack Obama Birth Certificate EXPERTS CONFIRM Obama’s Certificate Was A Fraud “Today you're going to hear lots of information that some of you are going to understand and going to be able to tell the true story. In fact, please know that this is a very technical, but the evidence is clear if you'll pay attention. Please note you're going to hear about two separate experts. These experts are two separate continents with no knowledge of each other and they draw similar conclusions. Again, that said, I know some of you are going to get this story and are going to tell the story the way it was.” —- “We and anyone else who dared to question the document have been the line falsely labeled grossly criticized in the bulk of the media on certain internet sources for years. Today we're going to set the record straight. I believe you will be shocked by what you hear and see today.” —- “Like the sheriff just told you, when you conduct criminal investigations, you have to let the evidence lead you. You never lead the evidence. And in doing this, my motive was to clear the document. Because to be quite honest with you, I didn't believe it. I didn't believe this was possible. I didn't think this would ever happen in this nation. I didn't believe it.” — “Back in 2012, I told you about Reed Hayes, a document examiner. Let me tell you about Reed Hayes, a man with 40 years, since 1974, 40 plus years of experience in examining forensic document, handwriting, a man who's well respected in his expertise, a court recognized expert, a document examiner. He is the man you go to when somebody gives you a bad check with a bad signature. This is the guy you run to. Law firms use him all the time. He's been maligned. And let me tell you something about Mr. Hayes. When I contacted Mr. Hayes, Mr. Hayes told me right off the bat, I'm an Obama supporter. I voted for him twice. He goes, and I will never do anything to hurt the President of the United States. What I had said to him was, Reed, I am not asking you to hurt the President of the United States. I'm asking you to take a look at this document and clear it and tell me there's nothing wrong with it. Would you at least do that? And he took a look at it. And when he called me back, he told me, Mike.” “I can't clear this, there's something wrong with it." And I asked him, I said, Reed, would you continue? I said, I know your position, but would you continue? And his answer to me was, this is what I do. I'll look at it, I'll do it. That's a man of integrity, respecting what his ability is to get to the truth. Because for Sheriff Apoyo and myself, this was never about Barack Obama. This is about a document. You take that document and you remove the name, Barack Hussein Obama, and put your name on there. If it was your document and it was brought to us, we would do the same thing with this document.” They COULD NOT clear the document. Much more info in this video if you watch the whole thing
10:00

The People Of America Have Been Deceived. They’ve Been Cheated & As A Result Our Country & World Is Now In Turmoil. It all Started With A Fake Barack Obama Birth Certificate EXPERTS CONFIRM Obama’s Certificate Was A Fraud “Today you're going to hear lots of information that some of you are going to understand and going to be able to tell the true story. In fact, please know that this is a very technical, but the evidence is clear if you'll pay attention. Please note you're going to hear about two separate experts. These experts are two separate continents with no knowledge of each other and they draw similar conclusions. Again, that said, I know some of you are going to get this story and are going to tell the story the way it was.” —- “We and anyone else who dared to question the document have been the line falsely labeled grossly criticized in the bulk of the media on certain internet sources for years. Today we're going to set the record straight. I believe you will be shocked by what you hear and see today.” —- “Like the sheriff just told you, when you conduct criminal investigations, you have to let the evidence lead you. You never lead the evidence. And in doing this, my motive was to clear the document. Because to be quite honest with you, I didn't believe it. I didn't believe this was possible. I didn't think this would ever happen in this nation. I didn't believe it.” — “Back in 2012, I told you about Reed Hayes, a document examiner. Let me tell you about Reed Hayes, a man with 40 years, since 1974, 40 plus years of experience in examining forensic document, handwriting, a man who's well respected in his expertise, a court recognized expert, a document examiner. He is the man you go to when somebody gives you a bad check with a bad signature. This is the guy you run to. Law firms use him all the time. He's been maligned. And let me tell you something about Mr. Hayes. When I contacted Mr. Hayes, Mr. Hayes told me right off the bat, I'm an Obama supporter. I voted for him twice. He goes, and I will never do anything to hurt the President of the United States. What I had said to him was, Reed, I am not asking you to hurt the President of the United States. I'm asking you to take a look at this document and clear it and tell me there's nothing wrong with it. Would you at least do that? And he took a look at it. And when he called me back, he told me, Mike.” “I can't clear this, there's something wrong with it." And I asked him, I said, Reed, would you continue? I said, I know your position, but would you continue? And his answer to me was, this is what I do. I'll look at it, I'll do it. That's a man of integrity, respecting what his ability is to get to the truth. Because for Sheriff Apoyo and myself, this was never about Barack Obama. This is about a document. You take that document and you remove the name, Barack Hussein Obama, and put your name on there. If it was your document and it was brought to us, we would do the same thing with this document.” They COULD NOT clear the document. Much more info in this video if you watch the whole thing

Wall Street Apes

1,140,943 次观看 • 3 年前

Caitlin: “What I love about you Candace though and I feel like this is something that is very lost right now especially on the women’s side is you just tell the game how it is. And it’s never in a disrespectful way you’re just trying to talk about the game how you see it.”
1:17

Caitlin: “What I love about you Candace though and I feel like this is something that is very lost right now especially on the women’s side is you just tell the game how it is. And it’s never in a disrespectful way you’re just trying to talk about the game how you see it.”

correlation

286,175 次观看 • 2 个月前

Phillip Scott -- founder of African Diaspora News, a YouTube channel with nearly 2 million subscribers -- says black Americans should NOT admit they would be partial to black defendants during jury selection, because a black juror would have helped acquit Karmelo Anthony. "Those of you who do get called to jury service, I think you should go. And you never know, you may be trying to help out a brother or sister. And when you go, when they ask you this question -- 'Hey, could you be fair?' Don't say, 'No, I ain't being fair.' Don't say no stupid crap like that. Please don't. Say, 'Yes, I can be fair. I can listen to the evidence,' because most of us can listen to evidence and be fair. Okay. And let's get on these juries, because if we can get on these juries, then you know if one black person get on a jury, it decreases our chances for conviction. Do you know that? It's all kind of studies about that -- about the more black jurors on the jury, the more that we have a chance of being acquitted. Not because black people just want to let go criminality. No, all of us do not agree with criminality. If you a black person in a black neighborhood committing crimes and being horrible, we want you out of there. We don't want you in the black community. Hell no. But if we see a situation like Karmelo Anthony, right?" "All Karmelo said is, 'If you physically touch me, I will defend myself if you do it.' That's basically what he was saying. So 'watch and see what happens' just mean 'I'm going to defend myself.' If a black person was in that jury room and they were saying that -- 'Yeah, he said touch me and watch what happens.' I'm like, 'Don't you got a right to, if you told me, if you put your hands on me I will defend myself? Would you be wrong for saying that to me?' Basically warning me do not put my hands on you. Every person would be right to warn a person: 'Don't touch me. Don't physically accost me. Don't punch me. Don't do nothing to me. Leave me alone.' [He does not explain how this warning justifies the stabbing] And nobody talks about how Austin Metcalf went over there to Karmelo Anthony. Had nothing to do with him. And if Karmelo Anthony was such a problem, why he didn't go get a police officer? That police officer's there. Why didn't you go get a school administrator? They were there. Why didn't he go do that?" "That was racial and we all know it. Any of us who have played these different schools, they got racism in them. We know them."
3:16

Phillip Scott -- founder of African Diaspora News, a YouTube channel with nearly 2 million subscribers -- says black Americans should NOT admit they would be partial to black defendants during jury selection, because a black juror would have helped acquit Karmelo Anthony. "Those of you who do get called to jury service, I think you should go. And you never know, you may be trying to help out a brother or sister. And when you go, when they ask you this question -- 'Hey, could you be fair?' Don't say, 'No, I ain't being fair.' Don't say no stupid crap like that. Please don't. Say, 'Yes, I can be fair. I can listen to the evidence,' because most of us can listen to evidence and be fair. Okay. And let's get on these juries, because if we can get on these juries, then you know if one black person get on a jury, it decreases our chances for conviction. Do you know that? It's all kind of studies about that -- about the more black jurors on the jury, the more that we have a chance of being acquitted. Not because black people just want to let go criminality. No, all of us do not agree with criminality. If you a black person in a black neighborhood committing crimes and being horrible, we want you out of there. We don't want you in the black community. Hell no. But if we see a situation like Karmelo Anthony, right?" "All Karmelo said is, 'If you physically touch me, I will defend myself if you do it.' That's basically what he was saying. So 'watch and see what happens' just mean 'I'm going to defend myself.' If a black person was in that jury room and they were saying that -- 'Yeah, he said touch me and watch what happens.' I'm like, 'Don't you got a right to, if you told me, if you put your hands on me I will defend myself? Would you be wrong for saying that to me?' Basically warning me do not put my hands on you. Every person would be right to warn a person: 'Don't touch me. Don't physically accost me. Don't punch me. Don't do nothing to me. Leave me alone.' [He does not explain how this warning justifies the stabbing] And nobody talks about how Austin Metcalf went over there to Karmelo Anthony. Had nothing to do with him. And if Karmelo Anthony was such a problem, why he didn't go get a police officer? That police officer's there. Why didn't you go get a school administrator? They were there. Why didn't he go do that?" "That was racial and we all know it. Any of us who have played these different schools, they got racism in them. We know them."

Breitbart News

140,420 次观看 • 2 个月前