Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This GRILLE should be illegal. WATT?! 78 diamond-shaped LEDs in this grille 😳 Too much or just enough? 👇 First-ever electric Bentley. 880HP. Fake V8 sound. Doors that open themselves. Zero petrol, maximum drama. #Bentley #BentleyTorc #ElectricBentley #CarTok #LuxuryCars #EVCars #Supercar #880HP #FYP

Mat Watson

82,110 subscribers

176,734 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

Autos & Vehicles Science & Technology #Bentley #BentleyTorc #ElectricBentley #CarTok #LuxuryCars #EVCars

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

30 Comments

JB1 day ago

Looks like a bunch of cheap junk. Shiny plastic looking grill, bent screen, shitty UI, cool but highly unnecessary sunroof tint shift, “emblem” door lights, ect. It doesn’t scream class or money which is what Bentley should be all about.

AFC Prinze (Fan)1 day ago

It looks like a Chinese car

J.A._Quil1 day ago

I became absolutely flabbergasted at that screen. What were they thinking?🤢

DJ Kitty1 day ago

It’s a clone of a Chinese car 🤭

Rob Meder1 day ago

better be able to option “off” those lights on the grill. bmw to with their stupid lit grills. headlights only asshats. the rest is cringe.

Karthik GR1 day ago

*grabs popcorn* waiting for Chinese clone under £50k 🙃

Steven1 day ago

Can’t wait to pick one up in 3 years for 45k

D1 day ago

That has already been seen...

Gandalf1 day ago

When you’re building a luxury SUV, please get rid of this nasty wiper and put it out of sight. Especially when you’re from the UK, and you already have a Range Rover that has an out of sight. Speaking of which this has Range Rover esque in the boot with nearly the same buttons. Do you see Rolls-Royce cullinan placing a wiper on back window? The answer is NO

SR_Capital1 day ago

It’s literally the new Porsche with a body kit n

Wartime Consigliere1 day ago

Calling it a froot instead of a frunk

Jordan Fritz1 day ago

But you have to still carry a stupid key fob. The front grill looks cheap and the number of knobs inside should scare anyone. Oh and I forgot, I still have to hire a driver.

Chuck1 day ago

None of that is self driving. #ElonWon

Mike B1 day ago

Here’s a proper Bentley

Dan1 day ago

When will they bring back knobs?? I want knobs!!! Do you think they'd design fighter jets with touchscreens? No! Guess why! Pilots need knobs!! Knobs, knobs, knobs!

Ekeluo1 day ago

This or the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Electric. What a fantastical conundrum.

Anza.1 day ago

Now why would you want to open all the doors with the key? Party trick? I hope you can set it up to open the windows instead.

Orb Tronik1 day ago

I’ve seen that grille before

Josh Mugayi1 day ago

Cullinun Ghost Spectre? 🧐😅

Mike B1 day ago

A Jaecoo that’s crashed into a branch of Halfords. Give me a 10 year old Bentley with an actual engine any day over this.

Luffy⚪🐵1 day ago

Can I give you my 2016 Mazda 3 I sport hatchback in exchange for this 🙂‍↔️🙂‍↔️

Babul1 day ago

An overpriced GLC ev

Esenbek Aliev 🔋1 day ago

Looks like JAC or Huawei or Geely but not freaking bentley

Sugi1 day ago

The amount of electric motors on hinges and whatnot in this car is staggering. Imagine what will happen in few years time when they started to fail one by one.

CryptoKen1 day ago

Super gay

Max1 day ago

Ev rubbish

Damian Harry1 day ago

I love a soft touch flap 😂

Dave F. Macias1 day ago

Ridiculous... The car for snobby, rich people

Stephen Wensley1 day ago

The good news is that you can turn off the grill illumination or just have the sound. Personally I’d switch it off, but if you can change the colour and red is available, perhaps that could be the future of the old school red label Bentleys

🇬🇧1 day ago

Ashtray! Whares the ashtray?🚬

Related Videos

I usually don’t watch K‑movies, but my schedule is wide open while I’m waiting for new episodes and K‑dramas to drop. So I decided to check out this K‑movie that just landed on Netflix and honestly, I’m glad I did. This one isn’t your typical loud romance or dramatic rollercoaster it’s quiet, soft, and emotional in a way that really sinks into your chest. From the first scene, it feels like watching real people people who hurt, who hide, who are afraid to let themselves be seen until someone finally does. The three main characters are perfect, they don’t make grand declarations, and nothing about their story is flashy and honestly, that’s what makes it so beautiful. I don’t want to give too much away, but this movie is about loneliness, connection, and healing in the smallest moments like the way two people make eye contact, or how someone speaks before they realize they’re saying something real. The acting is so freaking good. You feel every glance, every silence. The pacing is gentle not rushed and you actually get time to sit in the emotions. It’s the kind of movie that stays with you long after you press play. It’s not perfect for everyone if you want big twists or loud drama, this isn’t that. But if you want something heartfelt, honest, and quietly powerful you need to watch Pavane. Trust me. Go stream it. You’ll understand what I mean. #Pavane

I usually don’t watch K‑movies, but my schedule is wide open while I’m waiting for new episodes and K‑dramas to drop. So I decided to check out this K‑movie that just landed on Netflix and honestly, I’m glad I did. This one isn’t your typical loud romance or dramatic rollercoaster it’s quiet, soft, and emotional in a way that really sinks into your chest. From the first scene, it feels like watching real people people who hurt, who hide, who are afraid to let themselves be seen until someone finally does. The three main characters are perfect, they don’t make grand declarations, and nothing about their story is flashy and honestly, that’s what makes it so beautiful. I don’t want to give too much away, but this movie is about loneliness, connection, and healing in the smallest moments like the way two people make eye contact, or how someone speaks before they realize they’re saying something real. The acting is so freaking good. You feel every glance, every silence. The pacing is gentle not rushed and you actually get time to sit in the emotions. It’s the kind of movie that stays with you long after you press play. It’s not perfect for everyone if you want big twists or loud drama, this isn’t that. But if you want something heartfelt, honest, and quietly powerful you need to watch Pavane. Trust me. Go stream it. You’ll understand what I mean. #Pavane

EdoQueen🌹

79,777 views • 7 months ago

Neil Oliver paints a picture of the dystopian nightmare digital ID makes possible: "The new world into which we are sleepwalking is one of zero trust... To shop online, you'll have to use your digital ID to prove you are who you are. Just to read your email, to use online banking, even to open your computer will require your digital ID." "All of this can be connected to your carbon footprint and the rest of your social credit score... All of it is [based] on the Chinese model that enables the state to watch, track and record everything you do and everywhere you go... All of this can be tied to a central bank digital currency." "Imagine a future where artificial intelligence watches you try and charge your electric vehicle, or put fuel in your old car, and decides you've already emitted too much CO₂ this month. Result? No power or fuel for you." "Or you try and buy a steak and the AI decides you've consumed enough environment wrecking beef—you can't buy it." "Imagine you want to travel to London for a meeting and the AI decides you've tweeted something the government doesn't like. No ticket for you." "For the longest time, most of us have been slaves to debt. In the future, we are to be digital slaves—our every move under round the clock surveillance and subject to the yes or no of Big Brother." Credit: Neil Oliver

Neil Oliver paints a picture of the dystopian nightmare digital ID makes possible: "The new world into which we are sleepwalking is one of zero trust... To shop online, you'll have to use your digital ID to prove you are who you are. Just to read your email, to use online banking, even to open your computer will require your digital ID." "All of this can be connected to your carbon footprint and the rest of your social credit score... All of it is [based] on the Chinese model that enables the state to watch, track and record everything you do and everywhere you go... All of this can be tied to a central bank digital currency." "Imagine a future where artificial intelligence watches you try and charge your electric vehicle, or put fuel in your old car, and decides you've already emitted too much CO₂ this month. Result? No power or fuel for you." "Or you try and buy a steak and the AI decides you've consumed enough environment wrecking beef—you can't buy it." "Imagine you want to travel to London for a meeting and the AI decides you've tweeted something the government doesn't like. No ticket for you." "For the longest time, most of us have been slaves to debt. In the future, we are to be digital slaves—our every move under round the clock surveillance and subject to the yes or no of Big Brother." Credit: Neil Oliver

Wide Awake Media

198,830 views • 1 year ago

SHOCKING ‼️😳 I’ve just received the 79th message on my WhatsApp from a City resident, all of them saying the exact same thing as the previous 78… “Wanasema nisijaribu ku-interfere na hustle ya huyu Babes hapa CBD!” Jameni, I usually mind my own business, but sasa hapa naona itabidi mnisaidie kuelewa nini kweli inaendelea… kabla hawa wasee wanichomee simu na strict warnings. Hii Nairobi imeanza kunitisha, huwa najionea maajabu. After consulting widely, honestly this is too much and it shouldn’t be allowed to happen especially in the CBD where children are seeing what they shouldn’t be seeing. This is promoting immorality indirectly. If we allow this to continue, Alicia Kanini will be next in our streets na water boozer. In order to protect our environment and morals, there are things that shouldn’t be entertained in the CBD where we have young children who must be shielded from such bad behaviors. We must draw clear boundaries on what is acceptable in public spaces, especially in a city that represents the face of our nation. If we fail to act now, we risk normalizing behaviors that corrupt our values and expose our children to influences they should never encounter. Our responsibility is to safeguard both the dignity of our city and the morality of the next generation. And to be clear, Kenyan law does NOT allow public stripping or any indecent show in open spaces. 1.Penal Code Section 181 criminalizes “publicly exhibiting any indecent show or performance or any show tending to corrupt morals.” 2.Penal Code Section 182 also prohibits “publicly doing any indecent act.” 3.The Sexual Offences Act (Section 16) further criminalizes exposing obscene acts or content to children. Therefore, public stripping in the CBD is unlawful, immoral, and unacceptable and action must be taken. Necessary action shall be taken to protect the city and its residents.

Sensitive content

SHOCKING ‼️😳 I’ve just received the 79th message on my WhatsApp from a City resident, all of them saying the exact same thing as the previous 78… “Wanasema nisijaribu ku-interfere na hustle ya huyu Babes hapa CBD!” Jameni, I usually mind my own business, but sasa hapa naona itabidi mnisaidie kuelewa nini kweli inaendelea… kabla hawa wasee wanichomee simu na strict warnings. Hii Nairobi imeanza kunitisha, huwa najionea maajabu. After consulting widely, honestly this is too much and it shouldn’t be allowed to happen especially in the CBD where children are seeing what they shouldn’t be seeing. This is promoting immorality indirectly. If we allow this to continue, Alicia Kanini will be next in our streets na water boozer. In order to protect our environment and morals, there are things that shouldn’t be entertained in the CBD where we have young children who must be shielded from such bad behaviors. We must draw clear boundaries on what is acceptable in public spaces, especially in a city that represents the face of our nation. If we fail to act now, we risk normalizing behaviors that corrupt our values and expose our children to influences they should never encounter. Our responsibility is to safeguard both the dignity of our city and the morality of the next generation. And to be clear, Kenyan law does NOT allow public stripping or any indecent show in open spaces. 1.Penal Code Section 181 criminalizes “publicly exhibiting any indecent show or performance or any show tending to corrupt morals.” 2.Penal Code Section 182 also prohibits “publicly doing any indecent act.” 3.The Sexual Offences Act (Section 16) further criminalizes exposing obscene acts or content to children. Therefore, public stripping in the CBD is unlawful, immoral, and unacceptable and action must be taken. Necessary action shall be taken to protect the city and its residents.

Geoffrey Mosiria

219,443 views • 10 months ago

“It’s at this point the Dardanelles analogy becomes operative. In constricted waters, the combination of basic artillery and basic naval mines inflicted such damage on the world’s most advanced navy and its French ally that they had to retire. So, an attempt to force passage will present the United States with the same fallback option that Britain and France had in 1915: to take the littoral by force. But occupying the Gallipoli peninsular doesn’t begin to compare with occupying more than 150 km of Iranian shoreline, from Qeshm island in the west to the Port of Bandar Abas and down the coast to Koo Mobarak, where the strait widens. There is no defensible line that US forces could ever secure. The attempt would be Gallipoli times 10.” ••••••••••••••••• This is an excellent article by ASPI who I usually find too hawkish explaining just how difficult it will be undertake a ground invasion of Iran. 10 times harder than Gallipoli tells you everything you need to know. Those politicians who supported Trump and Netanyahus stupid folly in attacking Iran need to be called out - Albanese, Taylor and Hanson all supported a campaign that was doomed to fail. The war in Iran needs to end fast so that supply lines can normalise as quickly as possible. I can't emphasise enough how this war threatens to crash the world economy as a result of much higher inflation and credit crunches. Yes we need to become more self sufficient, but that is going to take years to happen even if our politicians get their act together. We don't have years, a few months at best, which is why we need cool heads using sound diplomacy to bring this conflict to a peaceful and speedy end. As a small isolated country in the South Pacific, Australia must always use diplomacy as its first form of defence. We should not be sacrificing our wealth or our children for the benefit of foreign vested interests or armchair war hawks.

“It’s at this point the Dardanelles analogy becomes operative. In constricted waters, the combination of basic artillery and basic naval mines inflicted such damage on the world’s most advanced navy and its French ally that they had to retire. So, an attempt to force passage will present the United States with the same fallback option that Britain and France had in 1915: to take the littoral by force. But occupying the Gallipoli peninsular doesn’t begin to compare with occupying more than 150 km of Iranian shoreline, from Qeshm island in the west to the Port of Bandar Abas and down the coast to Koo Mobarak, where the strait widens. There is no defensible line that US forces could ever secure. The attempt would be Gallipoli times 10.” ••••••••••••••••• This is an excellent article by ASPI who I usually find too hawkish explaining just how difficult it will be undertake a ground invasion of Iran. 10 times harder than Gallipoli tells you everything you need to know. Those politicians who supported Trump and Netanyahus stupid folly in attacking Iran need to be called out - Albanese, Taylor and Hanson all supported a campaign that was doomed to fail. The war in Iran needs to end fast so that supply lines can normalise as quickly as possible. I can't emphasise enough how this war threatens to crash the world economy as a result of much higher inflation and credit crunches. Yes we need to become more self sufficient, but that is going to take years to happen even if our politicians get their act together. We don't have years, a few months at best, which is why we need cool heads using sound diplomacy to bring this conflict to a peaceful and speedy end. As a small isolated country in the South Pacific, Australia must always use diplomacy as its first form of defence. We should not be sacrificing our wealth or our children for the benefit of foreign vested interests or armchair war hawks.

Gerard Rennick

10,573 views • 5 months ago

NEW: Who's trying to ban American data centers? Joe Lonsdale calls them the "BBC: Bernie, Bannon, and the CCP." The horseshoe is real. 👇 LIZ CLAMAN: Where do you stand on this [open source vs closed debate], Joe? JOE LONSDALE: Well, first of all, I think we should all agree we want America to win economically. We want to dominate in AI. And the only way we're going to do that is by first unleashing energy, reforming permitting, and standing up to the crazy populists I call the "BBC" — that's Bernie, Bannon, and the CCP. All those people want to ban data centers. They want America to lose. So we have to make sure the BBC radicals lose — and I think we're all on that side. CLAMAN: This is where I look a little bit deeper — that's our job. Is it really about AI safety and letting America win, or is it about market share? Alex Karp talks a lot about how he really feels there should be regulation — he's still very much hawkish on China — and yet he says we've got to let open-weight models, including the ones from China, be utilized. And then you begin to wonder: what's the concern here? Anthropic is the leader in enterprise AI — is it because he feels too many people have to pay for Anthropic's good-quality Claude? LONSDALE: Well, there are two different debates. First of all: should we be building data centers? Should America have cheap energy? Should we win in AI? I think the answer is yes — I think all those people would agree. The debate you're flagging is between them. Obviously there are conflicts of interest. If you own Nvidia, you want free, open software on top of the chips, as cheap as possible — people just buy more chips. In Palantir's case there's a strong incentive for people to control all their own data, and Alex makes very good arguments why some people would want to use open models with them. And listen — I think the closed platforms we have, which are innovating the fastest and have huge ecosystems around them, are very good for America. I don't think we should let them do regulatory capture. But Liz, there's another point Dario makes that I do agree with: these Chinese open models — they're dangerous. And we have data; we've shown this consistently. If this Chinese model, if it sees that you're working for the U.S. government, it actually makes your code more vulnerable. We've seen this many times. Just as I was against China being able to use TikTok to program socialism or whatever else into our young people, I also don't want China's AI going into our companies, able to program in vulnerabilities or other secret things. So I do think we have to be very careful about the Chinese models.

NEW: Who's trying to ban American data centers? Joe Lonsdale calls them the "BBC: Bernie, Bannon, and the CCP." The horseshoe is real. 👇 LIZ CLAMAN: Where do you stand on this [open source vs closed debate], Joe? JOE LONSDALE: Well, first of all, I think we should all agree we want America to win economically. We want to dominate in AI. And the only way we're going to do that is by first unleashing energy, reforming permitting, and standing up to the crazy populists I call the "BBC" — that's Bernie, Bannon, and the CCP. All those people want to ban data centers. They want America to lose. So we have to make sure the BBC radicals lose — and I think we're all on that side. CLAMAN: This is where I look a little bit deeper — that's our job. Is it really about AI safety and letting America win, or is it about market share? Alex Karp talks a lot about how he really feels there should be regulation — he's still very much hawkish on China — and yet he says we've got to let open-weight models, including the ones from China, be utilized. And then you begin to wonder: what's the concern here? Anthropic is the leader in enterprise AI — is it because he feels too many people have to pay for Anthropic's good-quality Claude? LONSDALE: Well, there are two different debates. First of all: should we be building data centers? Should America have cheap energy? Should we win in AI? I think the answer is yes — I think all those people would agree. The debate you're flagging is between them. Obviously there are conflicts of interest. If you own Nvidia, you want free, open software on top of the chips, as cheap as possible — people just buy more chips. In Palantir's case there's a strong incentive for people to control all their own data, and Alex makes very good arguments why some people would want to use open models with them. And listen — I think the closed platforms we have, which are innovating the fastest and have huge ecosystems around them, are very good for America. I don't think we should let them do regulatory capture. But Liz, there's another point Dario makes that I do agree with: these Chinese open models — they're dangerous. And we have data; we've shown this consistently. If this Chinese model, if it sees that you're working for the U.S. government, it actually makes your code more vulnerable. We've seen this many times. Just as I was against China being able to use TikTok to program socialism or whatever else into our young people, I also don't want China's AI going into our companies, able to program in vulnerabilities or other secret things. So I do think we have to be very careful about the Chinese models.

American Optimist

99,359 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Australia’s fuel crisis isn’t “just bad luck, or “due to the Iran conflict”, it’s the direct result of net zero climate policies. The media in Australia are quick to blame the Iran war for empty diesel pumps and soaring prices. But that’s only the spark. The real fire was lit years ago by climate policies that made domestic refining unviable. Australia once had 8 oil refineries. Thanks to the Paris Agreement, net zero targets, the Safeguard Mechanism (their carbon tax/credit system), and tightening emissions rules, most shut down. Now they have just 2 left — both needing subsidies to survive. Australia imports ~90% of its fuel and sits on only ~39 days of petrol, ~29-31 days of diesel, and ~30 days of jet fuel. A huge, car-and-truck-dependent country with fragile supply chains. The same mechanism is at work here in Britain. Our North Sea oil and gas producers face 78% effective taxation through the windfall/energy profits levy , explicitly designed to disincentivise carbon-intensive activity. Investment has collapsed, companies have left, and we’re more exposed than ever. We still need diesel for tractors, trucks, mining, and freight. Without it, food doesn’t get to shelves, supermarkets empty, and economies grind to a halt. This isn’t abstract “climate action”, it’s self-inflicted vulnerability in energy security and food security. Australia is the warning light flashing for the UK and Europe. The war made it urgent, but the weakness was baked in by net zero ideology that prioritises carbon credits and emissions targets over keeping the lights on and the wheels turning. The smart move? REPEAL the damaging targets. EXIT or renegotiate the Paris Agreement. Prioritise domestic energy production and realistic reserves. Put affordability and security first, before shortages become the new normal here too. Australia is living the future net zero is building for all of us. We should be paying attention, not just blaming foreign conflicts. What do you think? Is it time to put reality before ideology? #NetZeroReality #EnergySecurity #AustraliaWarning #UKFuelCrisis

🚨 Australia’s fuel crisis isn’t “just bad luck, or “due to the Iran conflict”, it’s the direct result of net zero climate policies. The media in Australia are quick to blame the Iran war for empty diesel pumps and soaring prices. But that’s only the spark. The real fire was lit years ago by climate policies that made domestic refining unviable. Australia once had 8 oil refineries. Thanks to the Paris Agreement, net zero targets, the Safeguard Mechanism (their carbon tax/credit system), and tightening emissions rules, most shut down. Now they have just 2 left — both needing subsidies to survive. Australia imports ~90% of its fuel and sits on only ~39 days of petrol, ~29-31 days of diesel, and ~30 days of jet fuel. A huge, car-and-truck-dependent country with fragile supply chains. The same mechanism is at work here in Britain. Our North Sea oil and gas producers face 78% effective taxation through the windfall/energy profits levy , explicitly designed to disincentivise carbon-intensive activity. Investment has collapsed, companies have left, and we’re more exposed than ever. We still need diesel for tractors, trucks, mining, and freight. Without it, food doesn’t get to shelves, supermarkets empty, and economies grind to a halt. This isn’t abstract “climate action”, it’s self-inflicted vulnerability in energy security and food security. Australia is the warning light flashing for the UK and Europe. The war made it urgent, but the weakness was baked in by net zero ideology that prioritises carbon credits and emissions targets over keeping the lights on and the wheels turning. The smart move? REPEAL the damaging targets. EXIT or renegotiate the Paris Agreement. Prioritise domestic energy production and realistic reserves. Put affordability and security first, before shortages become the new normal here too. Australia is living the future net zero is building for all of us. We should be paying attention, not just blaming foreign conflicts. What do you think? Is it time to put reality before ideology? #NetZeroReality #EnergySecurity #AustraliaWarning #UKFuelCrisis

Anika

41,432 views • 5 months ago

p.s: a long read but worth. love it every time taynew talk about their relationship dynamic, can literally sit all day long hearing the whole thing ♡ 💬 Did Hin told Te beforehand about cheek-to-cheek or Tay just got attacked by Hin? 🐳 No discussion before, Hin just did it. You guys must be know my personality and Hin’s personality well already. I’m the type who— how do I say it, I have to think before doing. Here’s the thing, I just took Enneagram course. Before, it was just self-taught and I knew my type, but after meeting this guru and got to dive in deeply, turns out I’m actually the type I never thought of before. As well as New. These Enneagram types are truly something we should study super deeply because it can shift depends on wings and arrows point that show in stress or relaxed situation, but finding our real true type is so difficult to find. I got Type 5, which the knowledge type, I’d feel less secure when I think my knowledge is not enough. I’ve always thought I was Type 9, the peacemaker, turns out I’m Type 5. So what I’m trying to say is, we have completely different personalities, New is the jumper one. He doesn’t like doing lot of practice, you know, doing the same thing over and over. He’s that, “Don’t put too much thought into it, just do it.” which actually can be a good side of him at some point. He won’t think much and let his instinct works. I’d say that both of our personalities got its own good and bad side. New can use his intuition, more realistic, you know, he can be a thing the way he wanted it to be—I can’t find the right words. But that’s not how I am, I tend to use my head too much, which actually can be an obstacle for my profession at some points. I won’t be able to jump when at one point I have to jump, because I’m too afraid of my unpreparedness and feel less secured. My head needs it to be structured about what to do for me to have a courage to do it. Instead, New will be like, “Like this and this, ok let’s do it.” As I said, these two personalities has its own good and bad side to be working in this industry. Thus, in growing up we have to adapt and pick each other good side to fulfill what we lack of. I have to learn how to jump, New has to learn how to be more structured and secured. I have to learn to think less, because after thinking much, in the end it never really give good results anyway. Every single time, I always do it better during practice than the real performance because I think too much. This is such a really bad side for someone who uses their head too much. For New, he always do it better in the real performance than practice, every single time. But “Faak Jai” is maybe the first performance I think I did it (better on real day). At that time, I tried to think the way New did, to focus on the present, and I’m proud of myself to can actually do it. It’s probably my first time ever since working in this industry to actually feel that kind of feeling. So about the cheek-to-cheek, yeah I think this is the perfect dynamics of TayNew, how I’m the overthinker one, while Hin always doing things not under control. Like, it’s a mix of well-prepared and spontaneity in both of us together. For example, if it’s New alone, it won’t look that smooth and look that well-prepared. On the other hand, if it’s me alone, there won’t gonna be such a magic moment that comes spontaneously. New fill things up and make things more perfect. If it were two people with the same personality like me, it’d be too rigid. This is the good side of having a work partner with different personality as us.

p.s: a long read but worth. love it every time taynew talk about their relationship dynamic, can literally sit all day long hearing the whole thing ♡ 💬 Did Hin told Te beforehand about cheek-to-cheek or Tay just got attacked by Hin? 🐳 No discussion before, Hin just did it. You guys must be know my personality and Hin’s personality well already. I’m the type who— how do I say it, I have to think before doing. Here’s the thing, I just took Enneagram course. Before, it was just self-taught and I knew my type, but after meeting this guru and got to dive in deeply, turns out I’m actually the type I never thought of before. As well as New. These Enneagram types are truly something we should study super deeply because it can shift depends on wings and arrows point that show in stress or relaxed situation, but finding our real true type is so difficult to find. I got Type 5, which the knowledge type, I’d feel less secure when I think my knowledge is not enough. I’ve always thought I was Type 9, the peacemaker, turns out I’m Type 5. So what I’m trying to say is, we have completely different personalities, New is the jumper one. He doesn’t like doing lot of practice, you know, doing the same thing over and over. He’s that, “Don’t put too much thought into it, just do it.” which actually can be a good side of him at some point. He won’t think much and let his instinct works. I’d say that both of our personalities got its own good and bad side. New can use his intuition, more realistic, you know, he can be a thing the way he wanted it to be—I can’t find the right words. But that’s not how I am, I tend to use my head too much, which actually can be an obstacle for my profession at some points. I won’t be able to jump when at one point I have to jump, because I’m too afraid of my unpreparedness and feel less secured. My head needs it to be structured about what to do for me to have a courage to do it. Instead, New will be like, “Like this and this, ok let’s do it.” As I said, these two personalities has its own good and bad side to be working in this industry. Thus, in growing up we have to adapt and pick each other good side to fulfill what we lack of. I have to learn how to jump, New has to learn how to be more structured and secured. I have to learn to think less, because after thinking much, in the end it never really give good results anyway. Every single time, I always do it better during practice than the real performance because I think too much. This is such a really bad side for someone who uses their head too much. For New, he always do it better in the real performance than practice, every single time. But “Faak Jai” is maybe the first performance I think I did it (better on real day). At that time, I tried to think the way New did, to focus on the present, and I’m proud of myself to can actually do it. It’s probably my first time ever since working in this industry to actually feel that kind of feeling. So about the cheek-to-cheek, yeah I think this is the perfect dynamics of TayNew, how I’m the overthinker one, while Hin always doing things not under control. Like, it’s a mix of well-prepared and spontaneity in both of us together. For example, if it’s New alone, it won’t look that smooth and look that well-prepared. On the other hand, if it’s me alone, there won’t gonna be such a magic moment that comes spontaneously. New fill things up and make things more perfect. If it were two people with the same personality like me, it’d be too rigid. This is the good side of having a work partner with different personality as us.

deeコ

22,979 views • 6 months ago

🚨#BREAKING - MARITIME LAW - Ok, this is epic, and it will blow your mind, if you don't even know it. Those who are awake will know. That's great and this is what we should share. So, your birth certificate is where it all begins. This is where much of the corruption begins. The moment you sign your BC, it is Maritime law. You are actually signing a form that classifies you as dead at sea. You become a commodity of the system and honestly you Google it, you research it and you probably have to be fair like I said, but it's true. You become um... In a sense, they seize all the assets and go into what they call a trust fund and then you have 6 years to declare yourself alive. Declare yourself still here and then you can regain your sovereignty. But we didn't know that. It was a system they had set up so that you and I and everyone else were traded like cattle on the stock market. So each of us has a trust fund. And depending on how old you are, it depends on how much money is there. So if you're over 50 or something, you've got millions in there because that's how long we've been traded for. And this is another thing that is also crazy. That's why the mortgage system is absolutely ruined. So when you go for a mortgage, you basically sign the papers and they always tell you, "come back in 3 days and we'll have the money." They then take that money out of their trust fund to pay for the house. So, that comes out of your trust fund in your name, which has been growing since you were born. They then charge you interest on your money, but they don't care about the monetary side. They want the house. So if you miss a payment, they'll miss out immediately, because they can repossess your house. For them the house is a commodity, an asset. Wait to share what the banks do, but this trust fund is where much of your money will come from and be returned to you. This is their money that they have earned from you. So, that's just one thing. Then you also have the tax side. Taxes have never been taken from us, it is illegal. It is a corrupt system. So, all the taxes that we pay, it is not that they are going to return them to us, like the exact amount of taxes that we paid. What I have heard on the channels is the fact that it will be bond based, so at a certain age you will get so much money back, at a certain age this... I think the 62+ category was like 110k or something like that. But obviously they'll know more about that when it comes, but that's where more money comes from. Honestly, you are ready to live a life of abundance. This is money that was ours, that should be ours, that we should have been living with to create a better life. Instead, they have put us in this corrupt system where they have been fighting and they are taking all of our money and keeping it for themselves. for themselves. I hope I have shed light on this. Many people ask where this abundance comes from. Remember that the 1% controlled 99% of the wealth that now comes back to us to live a completely different life. They will give us what is owed to us because we should never have fought like this. Join, it's not too late! 👇 ✅️

🚨#BREAKING - MARITIME LAW - Ok, this is epic, and it will blow your mind, if you don't even know it. Those who are awake will know. That's great and this is what we should share. So, your birth certificate is where it all begins. This is where much of the corruption begins. The moment you sign your BC, it is Maritime law. You are actually signing a form that classifies you as dead at sea. You become a commodity of the system and honestly you Google it, you research it and you probably have to be fair like I said, but it's true. You become um... In a sense, they seize all the assets and go into what they call a trust fund and then you have 6 years to declare yourself alive. Declare yourself still here and then you can regain your sovereignty. But we didn't know that. It was a system they had set up so that you and I and everyone else were traded like cattle on the stock market. So each of us has a trust fund. And depending on how old you are, it depends on how much money is there. So if you're over 50 or something, you've got millions in there because that's how long we've been traded for. And this is another thing that is also crazy. That's why the mortgage system is absolutely ruined. So when you go for a mortgage, you basically sign the papers and they always tell you, "come back in 3 days and we'll have the money." They then take that money out of their trust fund to pay for the house. So, that comes out of your trust fund in your name, which has been growing since you were born. They then charge you interest on your money, but they don't care about the monetary side. They want the house. So if you miss a payment, they'll miss out immediately, because they can repossess your house. For them the house is a commodity, an asset. Wait to share what the banks do, but this trust fund is where much of your money will come from and be returned to you. This is their money that they have earned from you. So, that's just one thing. Then you also have the tax side. Taxes have never been taken from us, it is illegal. It is a corrupt system. So, all the taxes that we pay, it is not that they are going to return them to us, like the exact amount of taxes that we paid. What I have heard on the channels is the fact that it will be bond based, so at a certain age you will get so much money back, at a certain age this... I think the 62+ category was like 110k or something like that. But obviously they'll know more about that when it comes, but that's where more money comes from. Honestly, you are ready to live a life of abundance. This is money that was ours, that should be ours, that we should have been living with to create a better life. Instead, they have put us in this corrupt system where they have been fighting and they are taking all of our money and keeping it for themselves. for themselves. I hope I have shed light on this. Many people ask where this abundance comes from. Remember that the 1% controlled 99% of the wealth that now comes back to us to live a completely different life. They will give us what is owed to us because we should never have fought like this. Join, it's not too late! 👇 ✅️

GP Q

616,739 views • 2 years ago

🚨 Helen Whately has just said what every hard-working taxpayer in “Alarm Clock Britain” has been screaming for years — and she’s absolutely right. “Alarm Clock Britain is sick of paying out for Benefits Street.” Why on earth would anyone drag themselves out of bed at dawn, pay crippling taxes, energy bills and rents, just to watch others rake in £30,000, £40,000 or even £60,000 a year completely tax-free on benefits? The incentives are completely broken. Work doesn’t pay. The system rewards staying home while punishing the grafters who keep this country afloat. But let’s be brutally honest — this isn’t just Keir Starmer’s mess. The Tories had 14 years in power to smash the welfare trap and the mass-migration time-bomb that supercharged it, and they did next to nothing. Now under Labour the benefits bill is exploding, the housing crisis is swallowing entire towns, and native British families are last in every queue while foreign nationals and their families jump straight to the front. This is two-tier welfare in full disgusting view: British pensioners choosing between heating and eating, British kids priced out of homes their grandparents built, British workers taxed to the eyeballs — all to subsidise a growing underclass and the demographic replacement experiment both parties enabled for decades. Hotels packed with illegal arrivals. Council lists flooded by foreign-born households. And a benefits system that actively disincentivises work for far too many. The hypocrisy stinks even more coming from MPs like Helen Whately herself — happily claiming £39,000 a year in taxpayer-funded London rent on top of her six-figure salary and hundreds of thousands in expenses. The political class lectures us about “scroungers” while living very comfortably on public money themselves. The silent majority has had enough of being treated like cash machines for everyone except ourselves. We demand: ✅ A radical welfare overhaul — British people and British contributors first. Strict work requirements, time limits for able-bodied claimants, and a hard benefits cap that actually means something. ✅ An immediate end to benefits for illegal migrants, failed asylum seekers and anyone who hasn’t contributed. ✅ Mass deportations for foreign nationals living off the British taxpayer. ✅ A total halt to non-essential immigration until the welfare, housing and NHS crises are fixed. ✅ Real politicians who finally put Alarm Clock Britain — the hard-working backbone of this country — first, not globalist virtue-signalling and open borders. Enough is enough. The current system isn’t broken by accident — it’s broken by design. The Tories failed. Labour is making it catastrophic. Only real change will sort it. Restore Britain. Britain first — always.

🚨 Helen Whately has just said what every hard-working taxpayer in “Alarm Clock Britain” has been screaming for years — and she’s absolutely right. “Alarm Clock Britain is sick of paying out for Benefits Street.” Why on earth would anyone drag themselves out of bed at dawn, pay crippling taxes, energy bills and rents, just to watch others rake in £30,000, £40,000 or even £60,000 a year completely tax-free on benefits? The incentives are completely broken. Work doesn’t pay. The system rewards staying home while punishing the grafters who keep this country afloat. But let’s be brutally honest — this isn’t just Keir Starmer’s mess. The Tories had 14 years in power to smash the welfare trap and the mass-migration time-bomb that supercharged it, and they did next to nothing. Now under Labour the benefits bill is exploding, the housing crisis is swallowing entire towns, and native British families are last in every queue while foreign nationals and their families jump straight to the front. This is two-tier welfare in full disgusting view: British pensioners choosing between heating and eating, British kids priced out of homes their grandparents built, British workers taxed to the eyeballs — all to subsidise a growing underclass and the demographic replacement experiment both parties enabled for decades. Hotels packed with illegal arrivals. Council lists flooded by foreign-born households. And a benefits system that actively disincentivises work for far too many. The hypocrisy stinks even more coming from MPs like Helen Whately herself — happily claiming £39,000 a year in taxpayer-funded London rent on top of her six-figure salary and hundreds of thousands in expenses. The political class lectures us about “scroungers” while living very comfortably on public money themselves. The silent majority has had enough of being treated like cash machines for everyone except ourselves. We demand: ✅ A radical welfare overhaul — British people and British contributors first. Strict work requirements, time limits for able-bodied claimants, and a hard benefits cap that actually means something. ✅ An immediate end to benefits for illegal migrants, failed asylum seekers and anyone who hasn’t contributed. ✅ Mass deportations for foreign nationals living off the British taxpayer. ✅ A total halt to non-essential immigration until the welfare, housing and NHS crises are fixed. ✅ Real politicians who finally put Alarm Clock Britain — the hard-working backbone of this country — first, not globalist virtue-signalling and open borders. Enough is enough. The current system isn’t broken by accident — it’s broken by design. The Tories failed. Labour is making it catastrophic. Only real change will sort it. Restore Britain. Britain first — always.

Right over Left Everytime

62,036 views • 4 months ago

#BaiLu on choosing to dub Li Peiyi with her own voice “I’d like to talk a bit about the dubbing. It was mainly because of the filming environment in Hengdian there were a lot of noise issues. When we first started shooting this drama, the plan was to use the original on-set audio entirely. But as filming continued, the environmental interference became too much. We had a huge amount of dialogue every day, and eventually the director told us, ‘Forget it either you dub it yourselves in post-production, or we’ll bring in professional voice actors.’ By the end, voice actress Qiao Shiyu had already recorded my lines three times. She worked incredibly hard! Later on, though, the director messaged me on WeChat and said, ‘Lulu, come to the editing room. Don’t just listen on your phone listen in surround sound and then make your choice.’ Since this character is somewhat similar to my role in The Legends (Zhao Yao), Teacher Qiao Shiyu had dubbed it very diligently three times. In the end, I spent an entire afternoon in the editing room, and the whole team decided together that my natural voice might suit Pei Yi better. My voice isn’t perfect, and my delivery isn’t the absolute best, but perhaps for Pei Yi who isn’t meant to sound overly polished or perfectly ‘pretty’ my vocal tone fit the character more. So we ultimately chose to use my own voice. As actors, we know that using original audio is a real test of our abilities. We’ll keep working hard, and for any areas where I didn’t do well enough, I hope everyone can be understanding.”

#BaiLu on choosing to dub Li Peiyi with her own voice “I’d like to talk a bit about the dubbing. It was mainly because of the filming environment in Hengdian there were a lot of noise issues. When we first started shooting this drama, the plan was to use the original on-set audio entirely. But as filming continued, the environmental interference became too much. We had a huge amount of dialogue every day, and eventually the director told us, ‘Forget it either you dub it yourselves in post-production, or we’ll bring in professional voice actors.’ By the end, voice actress Qiao Shiyu had already recorded my lines three times. She worked incredibly hard! Later on, though, the director messaged me on WeChat and said, ‘Lulu, come to the editing room. Don’t just listen on your phone listen in surround sound and then make your choice.’ Since this character is somewhat similar to my role in The Legends (Zhao Yao), Teacher Qiao Shiyu had dubbed it very diligently three times. In the end, I spent an entire afternoon in the editing room, and the whole team decided together that my natural voice might suit Pei Yi better. My voice isn’t perfect, and my delivery isn’t the absolute best, but perhaps for Pei Yi who isn’t meant to sound overly polished or perfectly ‘pretty’ my vocal tone fit the character more. So we ultimately chose to use my own voice. As actors, we know that using original audio is a real test of our abilities. We’ll keep working hard, and for any areas where I didn’t do well enough, I hope everyone can be understanding.”

美

21,805 views • 7 months ago

AIR INDIA 787 ‘thoughts’ I’m surprised nobody, even the experts) have mentioned this… The 787 Dreamliner (all variants) has an ‘Air Ground Sensing’ system that opens the Main Gear doors immediately upon leaving the runway and prior to the (Flight Deck) Lever being moved manually to the ‘up’ position. I’ve witnessed this literally hundreds of times when filming The 787 and it’s clear on the footage attached: upon rotate, about one second from wheels off ground, the main Gear Doors open. Then, around three to four seconds (pilot discretion) Positive Rate is called/agreed and the Gear Lever is moved to the UP position. On a side note, the 787 is quite prone to brake malfunction, mostly down to the electric brake system that can fail from time to time on a single (or more) wheel. If the wheels are not retracted within a given amount of time due to a wheel continuing to spin, the gear doors will close back-up until the wheel(s) stop spinning and the gear is recycled at which time the doors will re-open and the gear will retract fully. This is the takeoff/gear-up procedure with all 787s. This is quite clearly not the case when observing the CCTV footage of the doomed Air India jet. I think it’s quite evident there was some kind of (electrical?) malfunction with the system(s). The question of the Flap (takeoff) Setting is still a mystery as, with poor quality footage, it’s difficult to completely confirm whether the flaps were extended or not. In my personal opinion they were not extended. There was a CNN reporter right next to one of the wings on the ground. Although it was heavily charred, it would’ve been clear to see if they were extended or not 🤷🏼‍♂️ Also, as for possible (engine) ingestion/failure, whether by birds or other FOD, there is no evidence of engine Compressor Stall, which is very clear to see in many videos online when it does happen with bird strikes, especially at rotate power/speed. The engine(s) will ‘pop’ flames out of the back. What is evident, is that the Jet uses all of the available runway, which is clear by the amount of dust being kicked-up on rotate. The Jet never seems to reach the optimal takeoff angle, right from the rotate point it appears to struggle, which would suggest either engine power issues or, as mentioned, the lack of lift from the Flaps/Slats. Witness accounts say there was a distinct lack of engine noise coming from the jet, which backs-up some theories of engine failure. You would expect, even with a lack of Flap setting the pilot would be able to increase to max (TOGA) power to give them some chance of climbing or at least gaining enough altitude to get themselves back to the airfield or to a safer (crash) landing zone. That ‘power up’ would be evident with black exhaust from the engines, but that didn’t happen - at all. You’ll see/hear from the (second part) footage I’ve filmed, that the engine sound is very evident at this height and that this climb-out is too Standard Operating Procedures. Personally I find it hard to believe the NFP would make such a rookie mistake as to raise the flaps (push and move the staggered lever) as opposed to the gear lever which is a simple up-down motion. The two levers are also in completely different positions: Gear lever on the facing panel and flap lever (with many settings) next to the throttles. Plus this is such a basic procedure that even the most rookie pilot wouldn’t make this mistake 🤷🏼‍♂️ Again, this is just my opinion and observations based on visual and actual experiences. The CVR and FDR will deliver the final evidence.

AIR INDIA 787 ‘thoughts’ I’m surprised nobody, even the experts) have mentioned this… The 787 Dreamliner (all variants) has an ‘Air Ground Sensing’ system that opens the Main Gear doors immediately upon leaving the runway and prior to the (Flight Deck) Lever being moved manually to the ‘up’ position. I’ve witnessed this literally hundreds of times when filming The 787 and it’s clear on the footage attached: upon rotate, about one second from wheels off ground, the main Gear Doors open. Then, around three to four seconds (pilot discretion) Positive Rate is called/agreed and the Gear Lever is moved to the UP position. On a side note, the 787 is quite prone to brake malfunction, mostly down to the electric brake system that can fail from time to time on a single (or more) wheel. If the wheels are not retracted within a given amount of time due to a wheel continuing to spin, the gear doors will close back-up until the wheel(s) stop spinning and the gear is recycled at which time the doors will re-open and the gear will retract fully. This is the takeoff/gear-up procedure with all 787s. This is quite clearly not the case when observing the CCTV footage of the doomed Air India jet. I think it’s quite evident there was some kind of (electrical?) malfunction with the system(s). The question of the Flap (takeoff) Setting is still a mystery as, with poor quality footage, it’s difficult to completely confirm whether the flaps were extended or not. In my personal opinion they were not extended. There was a CNN reporter right next to one of the wings on the ground. Although it was heavily charred, it would’ve been clear to see if they were extended or not 🤷🏼‍♂️ Also, as for possible (engine) ingestion/failure, whether by birds or other FOD, there is no evidence of engine Compressor Stall, which is very clear to see in many videos online when it does happen with bird strikes, especially at rotate power/speed. The engine(s) will ‘pop’ flames out of the back. What is evident, is that the Jet uses all of the available runway, which is clear by the amount of dust being kicked-up on rotate. The Jet never seems to reach the optimal takeoff angle, right from the rotate point it appears to struggle, which would suggest either engine power issues or, as mentioned, the lack of lift from the Flaps/Slats. Witness accounts say there was a distinct lack of engine noise coming from the jet, which backs-up some theories of engine failure. You would expect, even with a lack of Flap setting the pilot would be able to increase to max (TOGA) power to give them some chance of climbing or at least gaining enough altitude to get themselves back to the airfield or to a safer (crash) landing zone. That ‘power up’ would be evident with black exhaust from the engines, but that didn’t happen - at all. You’ll see/hear from the (second part) footage I’ve filmed, that the engine sound is very evident at this height and that this climb-out is too Standard Operating Procedures. Personally I find it hard to believe the NFP would make such a rookie mistake as to raise the flaps (push and move the staggered lever) as opposed to the gear lever which is a simple up-down motion. The two levers are also in completely different positions: Gear lever on the facing panel and flap lever (with many settings) next to the throttles. Plus this is such a basic procedure that even the most rookie pilot wouldn’t make this mistake 🤷🏼‍♂️ Again, this is just my opinion and observations based on visual and actual experiences. The CVR and FDR will deliver the final evidence.

BIG JET TV

1,728,737 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Joe Kent Just Issued A MASSIVE Warning: Is Our Favorite “Ally” SABOTAGING American Peace? 🤔 Listen closely, because Joe Kent just issued a extremely important warning. We are on the verge of a historic, tentative two-week ceasefire with Iran. This isn’t just about “stopping a war”; it’s about America First. It’s about reopening the Strait of Hormuz, lowering energy prices, and finally getting our commerce back online so American families can actually afford to live again. But there is a major problem. Joe Kent is warning us that while President Trump is working to secure a lasting peace, our own "allies" in the Israeli government might be the ones to blow it all up. As Kent points out, Israel’s strategic goals are not the same as America’s strategic goals. While we want stability and open trade, they are focused on a total regime collapse in Iran—even if it means dragging American boys into another endless Middle Eastern war. Here is the deal: Israel has a history of targeting negotiators and launching "strategic strikes" right when a peace deal is on the table. The Solution: Kent is calling for us to RESTRAIN Israel. How? By pulling back the offensive military capabilities we provide them. Defense vs. Offense: It’s time to stop funding offensive operations that escalate global conflict. If they want to defend their borders, fine—but they don't get to use American hardware to sabotage an American peace deal. 🇺🇸 AMERICA FIRST MEANS AMERICA FIRST For too long, we’ve been told that we have to put another country’s objectives above our own national security. Enough. Every military action we’ve taken in that region has only made the regime stronger and the world more dangerous. There is no military solution here. The only win is a diplomatic one that brings our troops home and gets our economy moving. President Trump is on the cusp of hopefully ending this ILLEGAL war, but he is being flanked by people who would rather see a controlled explosion than a peaceful resolution. It is time to choose: Do we want a "Lasting Peace," or are we going to keep letting the tail wag the dog? I want to know your thoughts. Is Joe Kent right to demand we pull back military aid to keep Israel in check, or have we become too entangled to ever walk away? Sound off in the comments. Let’s get into it. 👇

🚨 Joe Kent Just Issued A MASSIVE Warning: Is Our Favorite “Ally” SABOTAGING American Peace? 🤔 Listen closely, because Joe Kent just issued a extremely important warning. We are on the verge of a historic, tentative two-week ceasefire with Iran. This isn’t just about “stopping a war”; it’s about America First. It’s about reopening the Strait of Hormuz, lowering energy prices, and finally getting our commerce back online so American families can actually afford to live again. But there is a major problem. Joe Kent is warning us that while President Trump is working to secure a lasting peace, our own "allies" in the Israeli government might be the ones to blow it all up. As Kent points out, Israel’s strategic goals are not the same as America’s strategic goals. While we want stability and open trade, they are focused on a total regime collapse in Iran—even if it means dragging American boys into another endless Middle Eastern war. Here is the deal: Israel has a history of targeting negotiators and launching "strategic strikes" right when a peace deal is on the table. The Solution: Kent is calling for us to RESTRAIN Israel. How? By pulling back the offensive military capabilities we provide them. Defense vs. Offense: It’s time to stop funding offensive operations that escalate global conflict. If they want to defend their borders, fine—but they don't get to use American hardware to sabotage an American peace deal. 🇺🇸 AMERICA FIRST MEANS AMERICA FIRST For too long, we’ve been told that we have to put another country’s objectives above our own national security. Enough. Every military action we’ve taken in that region has only made the regime stronger and the world more dangerous. There is no military solution here. The only win is a diplomatic one that brings our troops home and gets our economy moving. President Trump is on the cusp of hopefully ending this ILLEGAL war, but he is being flanked by people who would rather see a controlled explosion than a peaceful resolution. It is time to choose: Do we want a "Lasting Peace," or are we going to keep letting the tail wag the dog? I want to know your thoughts. Is Joe Kent right to demand we pull back military aid to keep Israel in check, or have we become too entangled to ever walk away? Sound off in the comments. Let’s get into it. 👇

Project Constitution

177,951 views • 5 months ago

#C4News cover the vigil for Jason Arday in Trafalgar Square, London Lord Simon Woolley, Principal of Homerton College, Cambridge, "This time last week I was with Jason, because we knew Jason was suffering, we knew he felt hounded by those rabid wolves" "Jason wouldn't dare leave the house, and we said we'll get a taxi for you. We held him in our arms and told him he was loved" "He held Dianne Abbott's hands and he said: I love you. Then he said, "They're hounding me to death, and I cannot see a way out" Diane Abbott, "He was first appointed as a professor in Cambridge three years ago" "And for those three years he had a vicious campaign, a bitter campaign, by anonymous people, by other professors, who just didn't believe that a black man should be a Cambridge professor" One of his students, "His greatest contribution cannot be found in a palpitation, a title or a citation, nor in his talks" "It is found in people who continue to love him, in the lives he changed, and the confidence gave us and the doors that he fought to hold open behind him" Bell Ribeiro-Addy, "The public cruelty Jason was subjected to was too much for any man to bear" "The outpouring or love, support and grief since his death means so much to us" "Although it is bittersweet, kindness is needed in life, not just in death" Krishnan Guru-Murthy, "If you could change the world in any way, how would you change it?" Professor Jason Arday, "I would take a thread and a needle and I would interweave love into our society." "I think the absence of love in our society is absolutely palpable." "I feel the empathy we have for one another, the tolerance for one another, has completely eroded" "There is so much anger in society, and I often think what would one replace that with?" "If I could change the world, I would have the world spin on an axis of love"

#C4News cover the vigil for Jason Arday in Trafalgar Square, London Lord Simon Woolley, Principal of Homerton College, Cambridge, "This time last week I was with Jason, because we knew Jason was suffering, we knew he felt hounded by those rabid wolves" "Jason wouldn't dare leave the house, and we said we'll get a taxi for you. We held him in our arms and told him he was loved" "He held Dianne Abbott's hands and he said: I love you. Then he said, "They're hounding me to death, and I cannot see a way out" Diane Abbott, "He was first appointed as a professor in Cambridge three years ago" "And for those three years he had a vicious campaign, a bitter campaign, by anonymous people, by other professors, who just didn't believe that a black man should be a Cambridge professor" One of his students, "His greatest contribution cannot be found in a palpitation, a title or a citation, nor in his talks" "It is found in people who continue to love him, in the lives he changed, and the confidence gave us and the doors that he fought to hold open behind him" Bell Ribeiro-Addy, "The public cruelty Jason was subjected to was too much for any man to bear" "The outpouring or love, support and grief since his death means so much to us" "Although it is bittersweet, kindness is needed in life, not just in death" Krishnan Guru-Murthy, "If you could change the world in any way, how would you change it?" Professor Jason Arday, "I would take a thread and a needle and I would interweave love into our society." "I think the absence of love in our society is absolutely palpable." "I feel the empathy we have for one another, the tolerance for one another, has completely eroded" "There is so much anger in society, and I often think what would one replace that with?" "If I could change the world, I would have the world spin on an axis of love"

Farrukh

164,242 views • 1 month ago

There's a sound animals make when they've stopped hoping and started begging. Most people go their entire lives without ever hearing it. The men on that boat heard it at 6:40 in the morning, on water so still it looked like glass, in the kind of silence where you can hear your own heartbeat over the hum of the trolling motor. And then something in that silence moved. Not a fish. Not a bird. Something that had no business being where it was, doing what it was doing, for as long as it had clearly been doing it. I've watched this clip eleven times now and I still get the same reaction on the eleventh watch that I got on the first: a full-body flinch, followed by a slow, sinking realization of exactly what I'm looking at. That's rare. Most viral clips lose their power after the second viewing. This one doesn't. If anything it gets worse, because the more times you watch it, the more your brain starts doing the math on the timeline — how long, how far, how close it came to not ending the way it did. I'm not going to tell you what happens. I'm not going to describe the moment, because the moment is the entire point, and describing it would be like handing you a photograph of a sunset and calling it a vacation. You have to be there. You have to watch the water yourself and see it the way the man in the boat saw it — a fraction of a second before his brain even processed what his eyes were sending it. What I will tell you is this: there is a very specific kind of video that breaks the internet not because it's dramatic, not because it's violent, not because it's shocking in the traditional sense, but because it touches something older than language. Something underneath the part of your brain that scrolls. This is one of those videos. It hits the part of you that still remembers being small and scared and needing someone bigger to notice you. Every single person who has ever felt helpless, ever felt like they were fighting something too big for them alone, ever needed a hand reaching down when they had nothing left to reach back with — that person is going to feel this clip in their chest before their mind even catches up. Here's the part nobody talks about when they share this kind of footage: the decision-making window was almost nonexistent. There was no time to think, no time to debate, no time to weigh pros and cons like a rational adult standing in a grocery store aisle. There was a flash of recognition, and then there was action. That's it. That's the whole story of what separates people who freeze from people who move. It's not courage in the dramatic Hollywood sense. It's something quieter and, honestly, more impressive — the kind of instinct that only shows up when you're not performing for anyone, when there's no audience, when it's just you and the water and something that needs you right now. Except there was an audience. There was a camera. And that's the only reason the rest of us get to see what almost nobody on earth ever sees with their own eyes. Think about how many moments like this have happened throughout history with zero witnesses. Zero footage. Just a person and an animal and a lake and a decision made in half a second, then carried silently for the rest of that person's life as a story they tell at dinner parties that nobody quite believes. This time, it's different. This time there's proof. This time you don't have to take anyone's word for it, because it's all right there, unfolding in real time, no reenactment, no staging, no slow-motion dramatic score added in post-production. Just what actually happened, exactly as it happened, exactly when it happened. I keep coming back to the geometry of it. The distance. The angle. The way panic and instinct don't move in straight lines — they move in desperate, jagged little movements that somehow, against every probability, end up going in the right direction. There is a moment in this clip where the outcome could have gone either way, and if you watch closely, you can actually see the exact frame where it tips. That's the frame everyone remembers. That's the frame that gets posted in slow motion three days later with 40 million views and a caption that just says "I'm not crying you're crying." That's the frame you're going to screenshot without meaning to, just to look at it again after the video ends, because your brain doesn't want to let go of it yet. People love to say nature is cruel, indifferent, survival-of-the-fittest, red in tooth and claw. And sure — most of the time, that's true. Most of the time nobody's coming. Most of the time it's just you, alone, against odds nobody bothered to make fair. That's exactly why moments like this one matter so much when they happen. They're rare enough to be almost unbelievable, and real enough that you can't dismiss them as sentimental nonsense written for a greeting card. This isn't a story someone made up to make you feel something. Nobody scripted this. Nobody planned camera angles or hired someone to stand there looking heroic. It happened the way real things happen — badly framed, a little shaky, half of it almost missed entirely because the person holding the camera didn't know yet that they were about to capture something they'd be replaying in their head for years. I've spent more time than I'd like to admit trying to figure out why clips like this hit people so much harder than almost anything else on this platform. Wars, elections, business news, celebrity drama — all of it gets scrolled past in under two seconds. But this? This gets the full watch, the replay, the share, the comment that just says a single word because there are no other words that feel adequate. I think it's because this is proof of something we all quietly hope is true but rarely get to see confirmed: that when something is truly desperate, truly out of options, truly at the edge of what it can survive on its own — sometimes, not always, but sometimes — help actually shows up. Not because it's owed. Not because it's guaranteed. But because somewhere out there, someone was paying enough attention, and cared enough, to notice in time. That's a fragile kind of hope to build a worldview on. Most days the universe does not confirm it for you. Most days you're on your own and nobody's watching and nothing changes because you needed it to. But every once in a while, the universe hands you a receipt. Undeniable, filmed, timestamped proof that sometimes it does work out. Sometimes the thing that seems impossible five seconds before it happens becomes the thing everyone is talking about five seconds after. I've seen thousands of videos on this platform. I can count on one hand the ones that actually made my chest tighten before I even understood what I was watching. This is one of them. Not because of gore, not because of shock value, not because of some algorithm-bait fake drama edited together in Capcut with a trending sound slapped over the top. This is real, it's raw, it's completely unedited emotional whiplash, and it happens in under ninety seconds — which somehow makes it hit even harder, because you don't have time to brace yourself. You're just suddenly in it. There's a very particular kind of silence that happens in a room when someone shows this video to a friend who hasn't seen it yet. You know the silence. It's the one right after the moment happens, before anyone says anything, where both people are just sitting there processing. Then someone exhales. Then someone says "wait, go back." Then you watch it again, together this time, and somehow it's even more intense the second time because now you know it's coming. I've shown this to four people in the last two days. All four asked to watch it again immediately. Zero of them scrolled away before it finished. That's not normal behavior on this app. Nothing gets a hundred percent completion rate anymore — attention spans are too fractured, everyone's thumb is already halfway to the next post before the current one even loads fully. This one, people watch to the end. Every time. Here's a fact that should terrify you a little: most rescues like this one never make it onto a screen at all. Most of them happen in complete silence, witnessed by nobody, filmed by nobody, remembered by exactly one or two people who were there and nobody else. The only reason you get to see this one is a small, almost accidental miracle of timing — a camera that happened to be rolling, a person who happened to be exactly where they needed to be, at exactly the moment they needed to be there. Multiply that by every similar situation that has ever happened without a camera anywhere nearby, and you start to understand how much of the good in this world goes completely undocumented. How many small, quiet acts of decency happen every single day with zero witnesses and zero proof, simply because someone cared enough to act in a moment when nobody was watching and nobody would ever know. This time, we know. This time there's footage. And once you've seen it, you're going to understand exactly why it's already circulating everywhere, why people keep reposting it with captions that are just strings of crying emojis, why it's going to keep showing up on your feed for the next several weeks no matter how many times the algorithm thinks you've already seen it. I want to be very clear about something: I am not exaggerating for engagement here. I do this for a living. I've seen every trick in the book, every fake heartwarming edit, every staged "rescue" filmed for clout with a a paid actor and a script written by someone in a marketing meeting. I can spot fake from a mile away, and this is not that. This is the real thing, captured by accident, shared because it genuinely deserves to be seen, not because someone engineered it to go viral. The truth is, moments like this one are basically impossible to manufacture. You cannot fake the specific quality of panic that shows up right before help arrives. You cannot fake the particular kind of relief that shows up right after. Actors have tried for decades to replicate these exact emotional beats and it almost never works, because the real thing has a texture to it that fiction simply cannot copy. Your nervous system knows the difference even when your conscious mind can't articulate why. That's what you're about to watch. Not a performance. Not a recreation. The real, unscripted, entirely unplanned version of one of the oldest stories there is — something in trouble, someone who could have looked away, and a choice made in less time than it takes to read this sentence. I've thought a lot about what it says about a person, the instinct to move toward trouble instead of away from it. Most of us like to imagine we'd be the type to help. Fewer of us actually get tested on it in real time, with real stakes, with no time to think it through first. This footage is one of those rare, unfiltered tests, caught completely by accident, and the answer it reveals is the kind of answer that makes you want to believe better things about people in general. Maybe that's naive. Maybe I'm reading too much into ninety seconds of footage shot on a phone from a boat on a lake somewhere most of us will never visit. But I don't think so. I think there's a reason this specific kind of clip travels faster and further than almost anything else on this app, and I think it's because deep down, everyone scrolling past it is quietly starving for proof that the good instinct still wins sometimes. That somewhere, in some small unremarkable moment that nobody was supposed to see, it did. You're going to want to watch this at full volume. You're going to want to watch it more than once. And you're going to want to send it to at least one person the second it's over, because some things are simply too good, too raw, too real to keep to yourself. Scroll down. Hit play. Don't skip ahead. Let it happen the way it happened — in real time, unedited, exactly as it unfolded on a quiet morning that started like every other morning and ended up being one that a handful of people will never, ever forget. You'll know the exact second it gets you. Everybody does. And once it does, you're going to understand completely why this is already everywhere, why it's not going away anytime soon, and why — no matter how much content you consume on this platform every single day — this is the one still sitting in your head an hour from now. Watch it. Then watch it again. Then try to explain to someone else why you can't stop thinking about ninety seconds of footage from an ordinary morning on an ordinary lake. You won't be able to, not really, not in words that do it justice. Some things you just have to see for yourself. This is one of them. Let me back up for a second, because I think there's something worth unpacking about why this specific type of footage has such a strange grip on people who otherwise consider themselves fairly numb to the internet. We've all built up an immunity to most things online. Shock content doesn't shock anymore. Sad content doesn't move us the way it used to. Cute content gets a half-second smile and an immediate scroll. The threshold for actually feeling something has crept higher and higher every year, to the point where most creators have to exaggerate, stage, or manufacture emotion just to get a reaction out of an audience that's seen everything twice already. And then a clip like this shows up, completely unpolished, completely unplanned, filmed by someone who clearly had zero intention of ever going viral that morning, and it cuts through all of that noise instantly. No slow zoom. No dramatic music cue. No forced narration. Just a phone, a boat, a lake, and something happening in real time that nobody could have predicted five seconds before it happened. That's the part that gets me every time. The lack of preparation. You can tell, watching it, that the person holding the camera had no idea what they were about to capture. There's no anticipation in the framing. There's no build-up shot, no dramatic pause before the reveal. It just happens, mid-motion, mid-conversation probably, the way real things happen when nobody's expecting them to be filmed for posterity. I've worked with creators who spend six hours setting up a single ten-second clip to try to fake this exact energy. Lighting rigs. Multiple takes. A script written specifically to sound spontaneous. None of it ever quite lands the way this does, because authenticity has a signature that fabricated content simply cannot replicate no matter how good the equipment is. Your gut knows. It always knows. There's a reason the comments section under this kind of footage looks completely different from the comments section under almost anything else on this platform. No jokes. No sarcasm. No "this is fake" skepticism that usually shows up under viral content within the first ten minutes. Just people typing out real, unguarded reactions, the kind you don't normally see from adults who've spent years training themselves to look unbothered online. That tells you something. When a video manages to strip away the armor that most of us wear constantly while scrolling — the practiced cynicism, the ironic detachment, the instinct to act like nothing affects us — you know you're looking at something rare. Something that bypassed the defense mechanism entirely and went straight for the part of the brain that doesn't know how to perform indifference. I want to talk for a second about timing, because timing is the single most underrated element of this entire clip. A few seconds earlier or later in either direction, and this entire story looks completely different. That's the part that makes your stomach drop a little when you really sit with it. How close this came to being a story nobody ever heard, filmed by nobody, witnessed by nobody, remembered by nobody. We don't usually think about how much of what we consider "meant to be" is actually just an accumulation of tiny, invisible timing decisions stacking up in exactly the right order. A boat leaving the dock two minutes later than usual. A route taken slightly differently than the day before. A moment of quiet that happened to fall at exactly the right second for someone to notice something they easily could have missed entirely. Multiply those variables out and the odds of this exact sequence of events lining up the way it did start to feel almost absurd. And yet here it is, captured, verified, undeniable — proof that sometimes the universe threads a needle so precisely that even people who don't believe in fate start to wonder for a second. I don't think I'm being dramatic when I say that clips like this one function almost like modern folklore. A hundred years ago, this story would have been told around a table, passed down, exaggerated slightly with each retelling until nobody was quite sure anymore which parts were true and which parts had been embellished for effect. Today, it doesn't need to be exaggerated. It doesn't need embellishment. The raw footage does all the work that oral tradition used to have to do manually, and it does it more convincingly than any storyteller ever could, because you're not being told what happened — you're watching it happen, unfiltered, in real time, with your own eyes. That's a strange kind of privilege, honestly. Every generation before this one had to rely on someone else's description of moments like this. A witness recounting it secondhand, softened or sharpened depending on who was doing the telling. We don't have to rely on anyone's account. We get the primary source. We get the actual footage, timestamped, unedited, exactly as it happened, and we get to draw our own conclusions from it without anyone standing between us and the moment itself. I keep thinking about the people who happened to be nearby when this happened and had absolutely no idea, walking into that morning, that they were about to be part of something that would end up in front of millions of strangers within days. There's something almost dizzying about that. You wake up, you go about an entirely ordinary routine, and somewhere in the middle of an unremarkable morning, your life intersects with a moment that ends up mattering to people you will never meet, in places you will never visit, for reasons you probably never anticipated when you woke up that day. That's true of more moments than we realize, probably. Most of us will never know which ordinary Tuesday morning ends up being the one that quietly mattered more than we understood at the time. This is just one of the rare instances where we actually get to see it happen, see the exact moment it tips from ordinary into unforgettable, because a camera happened to be rolling and someone happened to hit record at exactly the right time. I also think there's something worth saying about the specific emotional cocktail this footage produces, because it's not simple. It's not just "aww, cute." It's not just relief. It's a genuinely layered reaction — fear first, because your brain registers the stakes before it registers anything else. Then tension, because you don't know yet how it resolves. Then, if you're paying attention, a strange kind of awe at how fast everything happens, how little time there was to think, how the entire outcome rested on a handful of seconds that could have gone completely differently. And then, right at the end, something that's hard to name precisely. Not just happiness. Something closer to relief mixed with gratitude mixed with a strange kind of faith restored in something you didn't realize you'd been losing faith in. That combination doesn't show up often. Most content gives you one emotion at a time, cleanly packaged, easy to categorize and move past. This gives you four or five emotions stacked on top of each other in the space of ninety seconds, and that's exactly why it lingers so much longer than almost anything else you'll scroll past today. I've been doing this long enough to know the difference between content that performs well because it's engineered to and content that performs well because it deserves to. This falls firmly into the second category. Nobody optimized this for engagement. Nobody thought about hook rate or average watch time or completion percentage while it was happening. It simply happened, and it happened to be extraordinary, and now it's traveling across the internet the old-fashioned way — person to person, share to share, because people genuinely can't help themselves. That's the purest form of virality there is, and it's becoming rarer every year as more and more content gets manufactured specifically to chase that exact outcome artificially. When something manages to go viral organically now, purely because it's real and it's rare and it deserves the attention, it stands out immediately against everything else competing for your scroll. You can feel the difference within the first few seconds, even if you can't articulate exactly why. I'll say this too — if you've made it this far into a post about a video you haven't even watched yet, that should tell you something. Most people don't read past the first two lines of anything on this platform anymore. If you're still here, some part of you already suspects this is worth your time. Trust that instinct. It's usually right. So here's what I'd suggest. Don't watch this distracted. Don't watch it with the sound off, scrolling past while doing three other things at once the way most of us consume content by default now. Give it the full ninety seconds of actual attention. Watch the water. Watch the timing. Watch the exact moment everything shifts, because that moment is the entire reason this clip exists in your feed right now instead of disappearing into the void the way ninety-nine percent of footage like this normally does. You'll understand within the first few seconds why this one didn't disappear. You'll understand why it's already been reposted thousands of times, why it keeps resurfacing on different accounts with different captions, why people who consider themselves completely desensitized to internet content are still talking about it days later. Some things are simply built to be remembered. This is one of them, and it earned that status the hard way — by actually happening, exactly the way you're about to see it, with absolutely nothing about it staged, softened, or exaggerated for effect. Hit play. You'll see what I mean before it even finishes. One last thing before you go watch it. I've noticed that the people who react the strongest to this clip are almost never the ones who consider themselves overly sentimental. It's the skeptics. The ones who claim they don't cry at commercials, don't get emotional over animal content, don't fall for "engagement bait" no matter how it's dressed up. Those are the ones who go quiet the fastest. Those are the ones who ask to see it again without explaining why. There's something almost funny about watching someone's carefully maintained emotional armor fail in real time over ninety seconds of unplanned footage from a random morning on a random lake. Maybe that'll be you. Maybe you're reading this thinking you're immune to this kind of thing, that you've seen enough of the internet to be unshakeable at this point. I've thought that before too, more than once, right up until the moment a video like this one proved me wrong in under two minutes. There's no trick here. No twist ending designed to manipulate you. No manufactured suspense built by a script written in a writers' room somewhere. Just a real moment, caught by accident, that turned an unremarkable morning into something worth remembering. Go watch it. Then come back and tell me I'm wrong. You won't.

There's a sound animals make when they've stopped hoping and started begging. Most people go their entire lives without ever hearing it. The men on that boat heard it at 6:40 in the morning, on water so still it looked like glass, in the kind of silence where you can hear your own heartbeat over the hum of the trolling motor. And then something in that silence moved. Not a fish. Not a bird. Something that had no business being where it was, doing what it was doing, for as long as it had clearly been doing it. I've watched this clip eleven times now and I still get the same reaction on the eleventh watch that I got on the first: a full-body flinch, followed by a slow, sinking realization of exactly what I'm looking at. That's rare. Most viral clips lose their power after the second viewing. This one doesn't. If anything it gets worse, because the more times you watch it, the more your brain starts doing the math on the timeline — how long, how far, how close it came to not ending the way it did. I'm not going to tell you what happens. I'm not going to describe the moment, because the moment is the entire point, and describing it would be like handing you a photograph of a sunset and calling it a vacation. You have to be there. You have to watch the water yourself and see it the way the man in the boat saw it — a fraction of a second before his brain even processed what his eyes were sending it. What I will tell you is this: there is a very specific kind of video that breaks the internet not because it's dramatic, not because it's violent, not because it's shocking in the traditional sense, but because it touches something older than language. Something underneath the part of your brain that scrolls. This is one of those videos. It hits the part of you that still remembers being small and scared and needing someone bigger to notice you. Every single person who has ever felt helpless, ever felt like they were fighting something too big for them alone, ever needed a hand reaching down when they had nothing left to reach back with — that person is going to feel this clip in their chest before their mind even catches up. Here's the part nobody talks about when they share this kind of footage: the decision-making window was almost nonexistent. There was no time to think, no time to debate, no time to weigh pros and cons like a rational adult standing in a grocery store aisle. There was a flash of recognition, and then there was action. That's it. That's the whole story of what separates people who freeze from people who move. It's not courage in the dramatic Hollywood sense. It's something quieter and, honestly, more impressive — the kind of instinct that only shows up when you're not performing for anyone, when there's no audience, when it's just you and the water and something that needs you right now. Except there was an audience. There was a camera. And that's the only reason the rest of us get to see what almost nobody on earth ever sees with their own eyes. Think about how many moments like this have happened throughout history with zero witnesses. Zero footage. Just a person and an animal and a lake and a decision made in half a second, then carried silently for the rest of that person's life as a story they tell at dinner parties that nobody quite believes. This time, it's different. This time there's proof. This time you don't have to take anyone's word for it, because it's all right there, unfolding in real time, no reenactment, no staging, no slow-motion dramatic score added in post-production. Just what actually happened, exactly as it happened, exactly when it happened. I keep coming back to the geometry of it. The distance. The angle. The way panic and instinct don't move in straight lines — they move in desperate, jagged little movements that somehow, against every probability, end up going in the right direction. There is a moment in this clip where the outcome could have gone either way, and if you watch closely, you can actually see the exact frame where it tips. That's the frame everyone remembers. That's the frame that gets posted in slow motion three days later with 40 million views and a caption that just says "I'm not crying you're crying." That's the frame you're going to screenshot without meaning to, just to look at it again after the video ends, because your brain doesn't want to let go of it yet. People love to say nature is cruel, indifferent, survival-of-the-fittest, red in tooth and claw. And sure — most of the time, that's true. Most of the time nobody's coming. Most of the time it's just you, alone, against odds nobody bothered to make fair. That's exactly why moments like this one matter so much when they happen. They're rare enough to be almost unbelievable, and real enough that you can't dismiss them as sentimental nonsense written for a greeting card. This isn't a story someone made up to make you feel something. Nobody scripted this. Nobody planned camera angles or hired someone to stand there looking heroic. It happened the way real things happen — badly framed, a little shaky, half of it almost missed entirely because the person holding the camera didn't know yet that they were about to capture something they'd be replaying in their head for years. I've spent more time than I'd like to admit trying to figure out why clips like this hit people so much harder than almost anything else on this platform. Wars, elections, business news, celebrity drama — all of it gets scrolled past in under two seconds. But this? This gets the full watch, the replay, the share, the comment that just says a single word because there are no other words that feel adequate. I think it's because this is proof of something we all quietly hope is true but rarely get to see confirmed: that when something is truly desperate, truly out of options, truly at the edge of what it can survive on its own — sometimes, not always, but sometimes — help actually shows up. Not because it's owed. Not because it's guaranteed. But because somewhere out there, someone was paying enough attention, and cared enough, to notice in time. That's a fragile kind of hope to build a worldview on. Most days the universe does not confirm it for you. Most days you're on your own and nobody's watching and nothing changes because you needed it to. But every once in a while, the universe hands you a receipt. Undeniable, filmed, timestamped proof that sometimes it does work out. Sometimes the thing that seems impossible five seconds before it happens becomes the thing everyone is talking about five seconds after. I've seen thousands of videos on this platform. I can count on one hand the ones that actually made my chest tighten before I even understood what I was watching. This is one of them. Not because of gore, not because of shock value, not because of some algorithm-bait fake drama edited together in Capcut with a trending sound slapped over the top. This is real, it's raw, it's completely unedited emotional whiplash, and it happens in under ninety seconds — which somehow makes it hit even harder, because you don't have time to brace yourself. You're just suddenly in it. There's a very particular kind of silence that happens in a room when someone shows this video to a friend who hasn't seen it yet. You know the silence. It's the one right after the moment happens, before anyone says anything, where both people are just sitting there processing. Then someone exhales. Then someone says "wait, go back." Then you watch it again, together this time, and somehow it's even more intense the second time because now you know it's coming. I've shown this to four people in the last two days. All four asked to watch it again immediately. Zero of them scrolled away before it finished. That's not normal behavior on this app. Nothing gets a hundred percent completion rate anymore — attention spans are too fractured, everyone's thumb is already halfway to the next post before the current one even loads fully. This one, people watch to the end. Every time. Here's a fact that should terrify you a little: most rescues like this one never make it onto a screen at all. Most of them happen in complete silence, witnessed by nobody, filmed by nobody, remembered by exactly one or two people who were there and nobody else. The only reason you get to see this one is a small, almost accidental miracle of timing — a camera that happened to be rolling, a person who happened to be exactly where they needed to be, at exactly the moment they needed to be there. Multiply that by every similar situation that has ever happened without a camera anywhere nearby, and you start to understand how much of the good in this world goes completely undocumented. How many small, quiet acts of decency happen every single day with zero witnesses and zero proof, simply because someone cared enough to act in a moment when nobody was watching and nobody would ever know. This time, we know. This time there's footage. And once you've seen it, you're going to understand exactly why it's already circulating everywhere, why people keep reposting it with captions that are just strings of crying emojis, why it's going to keep showing up on your feed for the next several weeks no matter how many times the algorithm thinks you've already seen it. I want to be very clear about something: I am not exaggerating for engagement here. I do this for a living. I've seen every trick in the book, every fake heartwarming edit, every staged "rescue" filmed for clout with a a paid actor and a script written by someone in a marketing meeting. I can spot fake from a mile away, and this is not that. This is the real thing, captured by accident, shared because it genuinely deserves to be seen, not because someone engineered it to go viral. The truth is, moments like this one are basically impossible to manufacture. You cannot fake the specific quality of panic that shows up right before help arrives. You cannot fake the particular kind of relief that shows up right after. Actors have tried for decades to replicate these exact emotional beats and it almost never works, because the real thing has a texture to it that fiction simply cannot copy. Your nervous system knows the difference even when your conscious mind can't articulate why. That's what you're about to watch. Not a performance. Not a recreation. The real, unscripted, entirely unplanned version of one of the oldest stories there is — something in trouble, someone who could have looked away, and a choice made in less time than it takes to read this sentence. I've thought a lot about what it says about a person, the instinct to move toward trouble instead of away from it. Most of us like to imagine we'd be the type to help. Fewer of us actually get tested on it in real time, with real stakes, with no time to think it through first. This footage is one of those rare, unfiltered tests, caught completely by accident, and the answer it reveals is the kind of answer that makes you want to believe better things about people in general. Maybe that's naive. Maybe I'm reading too much into ninety seconds of footage shot on a phone from a boat on a lake somewhere most of us will never visit. But I don't think so. I think there's a reason this specific kind of clip travels faster and further than almost anything else on this app, and I think it's because deep down, everyone scrolling past it is quietly starving for proof that the good instinct still wins sometimes. That somewhere, in some small unremarkable moment that nobody was supposed to see, it did. You're going to want to watch this at full volume. You're going to want to watch it more than once. And you're going to want to send it to at least one person the second it's over, because some things are simply too good, too raw, too real to keep to yourself. Scroll down. Hit play. Don't skip ahead. Let it happen the way it happened — in real time, unedited, exactly as it unfolded on a quiet morning that started like every other morning and ended up being one that a handful of people will never, ever forget. You'll know the exact second it gets you. Everybody does. And once it does, you're going to understand completely why this is already everywhere, why it's not going away anytime soon, and why — no matter how much content you consume on this platform every single day — this is the one still sitting in your head an hour from now. Watch it. Then watch it again. Then try to explain to someone else why you can't stop thinking about ninety seconds of footage from an ordinary morning on an ordinary lake. You won't be able to, not really, not in words that do it justice. Some things you just have to see for yourself. This is one of them. Let me back up for a second, because I think there's something worth unpacking about why this specific type of footage has such a strange grip on people who otherwise consider themselves fairly numb to the internet. We've all built up an immunity to most things online. Shock content doesn't shock anymore. Sad content doesn't move us the way it used to. Cute content gets a half-second smile and an immediate scroll. The threshold for actually feeling something has crept higher and higher every year, to the point where most creators have to exaggerate, stage, or manufacture emotion just to get a reaction out of an audience that's seen everything twice already. And then a clip like this shows up, completely unpolished, completely unplanned, filmed by someone who clearly had zero intention of ever going viral that morning, and it cuts through all of that noise instantly. No slow zoom. No dramatic music cue. No forced narration. Just a phone, a boat, a lake, and something happening in real time that nobody could have predicted five seconds before it happened. That's the part that gets me every time. The lack of preparation. You can tell, watching it, that the person holding the camera had no idea what they were about to capture. There's no anticipation in the framing. There's no build-up shot, no dramatic pause before the reveal. It just happens, mid-motion, mid-conversation probably, the way real things happen when nobody's expecting them to be filmed for posterity. I've worked with creators who spend six hours setting up a single ten-second clip to try to fake this exact energy. Lighting rigs. Multiple takes. A script written specifically to sound spontaneous. None of it ever quite lands the way this does, because authenticity has a signature that fabricated content simply cannot replicate no matter how good the equipment is. Your gut knows. It always knows. There's a reason the comments section under this kind of footage looks completely different from the comments section under almost anything else on this platform. No jokes. No sarcasm. No "this is fake" skepticism that usually shows up under viral content within the first ten minutes. Just people typing out real, unguarded reactions, the kind you don't normally see from adults who've spent years training themselves to look unbothered online. That tells you something. When a video manages to strip away the armor that most of us wear constantly while scrolling — the practiced cynicism, the ironic detachment, the instinct to act like nothing affects us — you know you're looking at something rare. Something that bypassed the defense mechanism entirely and went straight for the part of the brain that doesn't know how to perform indifference. I want to talk for a second about timing, because timing is the single most underrated element of this entire clip. A few seconds earlier or later in either direction, and this entire story looks completely different. That's the part that makes your stomach drop a little when you really sit with it. How close this came to being a story nobody ever heard, filmed by nobody, witnessed by nobody, remembered by nobody. We don't usually think about how much of what we consider "meant to be" is actually just an accumulation of tiny, invisible timing decisions stacking up in exactly the right order. A boat leaving the dock two minutes later than usual. A route taken slightly differently than the day before. A moment of quiet that happened to fall at exactly the right second for someone to notice something they easily could have missed entirely. Multiply those variables out and the odds of this exact sequence of events lining up the way it did start to feel almost absurd. And yet here it is, captured, verified, undeniable — proof that sometimes the universe threads a needle so precisely that even people who don't believe in fate start to wonder for a second. I don't think I'm being dramatic when I say that clips like this one function almost like modern folklore. A hundred years ago, this story would have been told around a table, passed down, exaggerated slightly with each retelling until nobody was quite sure anymore which parts were true and which parts had been embellished for effect. Today, it doesn't need to be exaggerated. It doesn't need embellishment. The raw footage does all the work that oral tradition used to have to do manually, and it does it more convincingly than any storyteller ever could, because you're not being told what happened — you're watching it happen, unfiltered, in real time, with your own eyes. That's a strange kind of privilege, honestly. Every generation before this one had to rely on someone else's description of moments like this. A witness recounting it secondhand, softened or sharpened depending on who was doing the telling. We don't have to rely on anyone's account. We get the primary source. We get the actual footage, timestamped, unedited, exactly as it happened, and we get to draw our own conclusions from it without anyone standing between us and the moment itself. I keep thinking about the people who happened to be nearby when this happened and had absolutely no idea, walking into that morning, that they were about to be part of something that would end up in front of millions of strangers within days. There's something almost dizzying about that. You wake up, you go about an entirely ordinary routine, and somewhere in the middle of an unremarkable morning, your life intersects with a moment that ends up mattering to people you will never meet, in places you will never visit, for reasons you probably never anticipated when you woke up that day. That's true of more moments than we realize, probably. Most of us will never know which ordinary Tuesday morning ends up being the one that quietly mattered more than we understood at the time. This is just one of the rare instances where we actually get to see it happen, see the exact moment it tips from ordinary into unforgettable, because a camera happened to be rolling and someone happened to hit record at exactly the right time. I also think there's something worth saying about the specific emotional cocktail this footage produces, because it's not simple. It's not just "aww, cute." It's not just relief. It's a genuinely layered reaction — fear first, because your brain registers the stakes before it registers anything else. Then tension, because you don't know yet how it resolves. Then, if you're paying attention, a strange kind of awe at how fast everything happens, how little time there was to think, how the entire outcome rested on a handful of seconds that could have gone completely differently. And then, right at the end, something that's hard to name precisely. Not just happiness. Something closer to relief mixed with gratitude mixed with a strange kind of faith restored in something you didn't realize you'd been losing faith in. That combination doesn't show up often. Most content gives you one emotion at a time, cleanly packaged, easy to categorize and move past. This gives you four or five emotions stacked on top of each other in the space of ninety seconds, and that's exactly why it lingers so much longer than almost anything else you'll scroll past today. I've been doing this long enough to know the difference between content that performs well because it's engineered to and content that performs well because it deserves to. This falls firmly into the second category. Nobody optimized this for engagement. Nobody thought about hook rate or average watch time or completion percentage while it was happening. It simply happened, and it happened to be extraordinary, and now it's traveling across the internet the old-fashioned way — person to person, share to share, because people genuinely can't help themselves. That's the purest form of virality there is, and it's becoming rarer every year as more and more content gets manufactured specifically to chase that exact outcome artificially. When something manages to go viral organically now, purely because it's real and it's rare and it deserves the attention, it stands out immediately against everything else competing for your scroll. You can feel the difference within the first few seconds, even if you can't articulate exactly why. I'll say this too — if you've made it this far into a post about a video you haven't even watched yet, that should tell you something. Most people don't read past the first two lines of anything on this platform anymore. If you're still here, some part of you already suspects this is worth your time. Trust that instinct. It's usually right. So here's what I'd suggest. Don't watch this distracted. Don't watch it with the sound off, scrolling past while doing three other things at once the way most of us consume content by default now. Give it the full ninety seconds of actual attention. Watch the water. Watch the timing. Watch the exact moment everything shifts, because that moment is the entire reason this clip exists in your feed right now instead of disappearing into the void the way ninety-nine percent of footage like this normally does. You'll understand within the first few seconds why this one didn't disappear. You'll understand why it's already been reposted thousands of times, why it keeps resurfacing on different accounts with different captions, why people who consider themselves completely desensitized to internet content are still talking about it days later. Some things are simply built to be remembered. This is one of them, and it earned that status the hard way — by actually happening, exactly the way you're about to see it, with absolutely nothing about it staged, softened, or exaggerated for effect. Hit play. You'll see what I mean before it even finishes. One last thing before you go watch it. I've noticed that the people who react the strongest to this clip are almost never the ones who consider themselves overly sentimental. It's the skeptics. The ones who claim they don't cry at commercials, don't get emotional over animal content, don't fall for "engagement bait" no matter how it's dressed up. Those are the ones who go quiet the fastest. Those are the ones who ask to see it again without explaining why. There's something almost funny about watching someone's carefully maintained emotional armor fail in real time over ninety seconds of unplanned footage from a random morning on a random lake. Maybe that'll be you. Maybe you're reading this thinking you're immune to this kind of thing, that you've seen enough of the internet to be unshakeable at this point. I've thought that before too, more than once, right up until the moment a video like this one proved me wrong in under two minutes. There's no trick here. No twist ending designed to manipulate you. No manufactured suspense built by a script written in a writers' room somewhere. Just a real moment, caught by accident, that turned an unremarkable morning into something worth remembering. Go watch it. Then come back and tell me I'm wrong. You won't.

Earth Unveiled

76,850 views • 9 days ago

My Girlfriend Gave Me An HIV; Not Sure Where To Go From Here ( Should We Stay Together?) Caller (Tim):so my question is, my girlfriend gave me a... a quite serious STD, and my parents found out about this. They are now against our relationship saying that it's a way that God is showing that this relationship was not meant to be. Um, I've been fighting this like against my parents. And my question is, has... is there too much that has happened for this relationship to work? Uh, or am I trying too hard to make it work? Dr. John Delony: Bro, there's a lot going on here, man. Whole lot. Um, before I dig in, let's... let me just... let's just have a conversation so I can get to know you for a second. Is that cool? Caller: Okay, yeah. Dr. John Delony: Um, you sound a little bit nervous. Are you nervous, or is this just weird? Or, I realize you're calling a stranger being like, "Yeah, I got an STI from this woman that I love." This whole thing's kind of weird. Caller: Well, no. This is basically the first person outside of this situation that I've talked to, so... Dr. John Delony: Gotcha. Well, dude, I'm... I'm grateful for the trust. It sounds like there's a lot, lot going on here. Um, tell me about you. How old are you? What do you do for a living? All that kind of stuff. Caller: Uh, 27. Um, uh, going to... uh, studying nursing. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Caller: And, uh, just about to graduate here. Dr. John Delony: So, congratulations on that. Um, do you live at home? Caller: No, I don't. Dr. John Delony: Okay. So, what kind of STI did you get? Caller: Uh, HIV. Dr. John Delony: Okay. So, you've got HIV. Okay, so I was wondering if this was... The... my first question was why in the world do your parents know? Um, if I'm 27, the last people on planet Earth I would call and tell I have an STI is my parents. But, um, HIV is super serious. What is your, um, health prognosis? Caller: it's... so, I guess the situation gets a little bit more difficult because, my dad does computer diagnostics, and he was able to accidentally kind of find out I have this, and so I am... Dr. John Delony: Accidentally kind of? What does that mean? Caller: Meaning he wasn't expecting it. He wasn't looking for it. It was just kind of came up when, uh, he was doing the... I regularly do checkups. He's a... a doctor. Dr. John Delony: Oh, so he's a doctor at the place where you went to get checked out, and he discovered through the computer system that his son has HIV? Caller: Yes. it's a... alternative medicine that he does, and so it's... it's a very different kind from modern medicine, so it's just the way that he found out. Um, I just go to my dad for all his, checkups. Dr. John Delony: Yeah. What a mess. Okay, so tell me about this person that you're dating. Caller: Um, so... um... I guess what... uh, what would you like to know about her? Dr. John Delony: Well, just tell me about her. Caller: Well, uh, she's a... she's a nurse. Um, and, uh, Illinois, and, um... This is the second, uh, serious relationship she's had. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Caller: Uh, for me, it's... um, maybe the first serious relationship for me. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Caller: Um, and so, she's... I mean, she grew up in a Christian family. She's... um... Dr. John Delony: Did she knowingly... knowingly give you HIV? Caller: No, she didn't know about it. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Is she the first person you've ever slept with? Caller: Yes. Dr. John Delony: Okay. How long have y'all been together?

My Girlfriend Gave Me An HIV; Not Sure Where To Go From Here ( Should We Stay Together?) Caller (Tim):so my question is, my girlfriend gave me a... a quite serious STD, and my parents found out about this. They are now against our relationship saying that it's a way that God is showing that this relationship was not meant to be. Um, I've been fighting this like against my parents. And my question is, has... is there too much that has happened for this relationship to work? Uh, or am I trying too hard to make it work? Dr. John Delony: Bro, there's a lot going on here, man. Whole lot. Um, before I dig in, let's... let me just... let's just have a conversation so I can get to know you for a second. Is that cool? Caller: Okay, yeah. Dr. John Delony: Um, you sound a little bit nervous. Are you nervous, or is this just weird? Or, I realize you're calling a stranger being like, "Yeah, I got an STI from this woman that I love." This whole thing's kind of weird. Caller: Well, no. This is basically the first person outside of this situation that I've talked to, so... Dr. John Delony: Gotcha. Well, dude, I'm... I'm grateful for the trust. It sounds like there's a lot, lot going on here. Um, tell me about you. How old are you? What do you do for a living? All that kind of stuff. Caller: Uh, 27. Um, uh, going to... uh, studying nursing. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Caller: And, uh, just about to graduate here. Dr. John Delony: So, congratulations on that. Um, do you live at home? Caller: No, I don't. Dr. John Delony: Okay. So, what kind of STI did you get? Caller: Uh, HIV. Dr. John Delony: Okay. So, you've got HIV. Okay, so I was wondering if this was... The... my first question was why in the world do your parents know? Um, if I'm 27, the last people on planet Earth I would call and tell I have an STI is my parents. But, um, HIV is super serious. What is your, um, health prognosis? Caller: it's... so, I guess the situation gets a little bit more difficult because, my dad does computer diagnostics, and he was able to accidentally kind of find out I have this, and so I am... Dr. John Delony: Accidentally kind of? What does that mean? Caller: Meaning he wasn't expecting it. He wasn't looking for it. It was just kind of came up when, uh, he was doing the... I regularly do checkups. He's a... a doctor. Dr. John Delony: Oh, so he's a doctor at the place where you went to get checked out, and he discovered through the computer system that his son has HIV? Caller: Yes. it's a... alternative medicine that he does, and so it's... it's a very different kind from modern medicine, so it's just the way that he found out. Um, I just go to my dad for all his, checkups. Dr. John Delony: Yeah. What a mess. Okay, so tell me about this person that you're dating. Caller: Um, so... um... I guess what... uh, what would you like to know about her? Dr. John Delony: Well, just tell me about her. Caller: Well, uh, she's a... she's a nurse. Um, and, uh, Illinois, and, um... This is the second, uh, serious relationship she's had. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Caller: Uh, for me, it's... um, maybe the first serious relationship for me. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Caller: Um, and so, she's... I mean, she grew up in a Christian family. She's... um... Dr. John Delony: Did she knowingly... knowingly give you HIV? Caller: No, she didn't know about it. Dr. John Delony: Okay. Is she the first person you've ever slept with? Caller: Yes. Dr. John Delony: Okay. How long have y'all been together?

Hecto Crypto | NetLink ⛓

14,886 views • 2 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Trump is at the Kennedy Center for the board meeting and a tour. He is totally overhauling it. He says they wanted to charge Lee Greenwood $30,000 just to sing there. Trump also says he is going to get with Speaker Johnson to fix its architecture. "We're here to have our first board meeting, Kennedy Center, and it's in tremendous disrepair, as is a lot of the rest of our country, most of it because of bad management." "We have a little problem with some people that work here. We had Lee Greenwood wanted to sing a little song today. And because of the cost in the union structure, for him to sing a song just for the board, just a board meeting, that was gonna cost $30,000. That doesn't sound too good. They wanted $30,000 to move a piano. So you can't have that. So we're gonna we're gonna fix it up." "It's really emblematic of our country. At the Kennedy Center, you look at the columns outside, you look at, I mean, they're supposed to be covered by something, whether it's marble or granite. They were never covered. They were painted. But, bring it into more modern times, a lot of money has been given to it, and the money has not been properly spent." "They built rooms underground with no windows, no nothing that will not be used ever. You're not gonna have people use them. It's such a waste of money, such a terrible waste, but we'll make it we'll bring it back. We'll make it great again. But it is so much like what I'm witnessing in other places." "We have open borders. We have men playing in women's sports. It's all the same thing. It's all the same mentality and thinking. So I'm very disappointed when I look around." "The bottom line, it has tremendous potential, and we'll work with Congress. As you know, it's a very public, a very public facility, and we'll do what has to be done. We'll be having a meeting with the speaker in the not too distant future. I think it's important to save this structure in this building."

🚨 JUST IN: Trump is at the Kennedy Center for the board meeting and a tour. He is totally overhauling it. He says they wanted to charge Lee Greenwood $30,000 just to sing there. Trump also says he is going to get with Speaker Johnson to fix its architecture. "We're here to have our first board meeting, Kennedy Center, and it's in tremendous disrepair, as is a lot of the rest of our country, most of it because of bad management." "We have a little problem with some people that work here. We had Lee Greenwood wanted to sing a little song today. And because of the cost in the union structure, for him to sing a song just for the board, just a board meeting, that was gonna cost $30,000. That doesn't sound too good. They wanted $30,000 to move a piano. So you can't have that. So we're gonna we're gonna fix it up." "It's really emblematic of our country. At the Kennedy Center, you look at the columns outside, you look at, I mean, they're supposed to be covered by something, whether it's marble or granite. They were never covered. They were painted. But, bring it into more modern times, a lot of money has been given to it, and the money has not been properly spent." "They built rooms underground with no windows, no nothing that will not be used ever. You're not gonna have people use them. It's such a waste of money, such a terrible waste, but we'll make it we'll bring it back. We'll make it great again. But it is so much like what I'm witnessing in other places." "We have open borders. We have men playing in women's sports. It's all the same thing. It's all the same mentality and thinking. So I'm very disappointed when I look around." "The bottom line, it has tremendous potential, and we'll work with Congress. As you know, it's a very public, a very public facility, and we'll do what has to be done. We'll be having a meeting with the speaker in the not too distant future. I think it's important to save this structure in this building."

Eric Daugherty

423,739 views • 1 year ago

So Andrew Wilson is currently live on YouTube after stating that he would release the text messages of Charlie Kirk claiming "the Left" was going to kill him (the very thing Erika Kirk said didn't exist months ago btw). There are a few important things to note about this live stream that I think you'd find disturbing. Outside of the incessant profanity (even for him) that he has used already, he has told SEVERAL LIES in just the first 10 minutes, including: Says that he reached out to Erika and TPUSA and that they IMMEDIATELY responded and were extremely cooperative in providing evidence to clear themselves and substantiate their alibis. He also claims that none of the people making allegations against them, such as Candace Owens , Stew Peters , and others, ever reached out ONCE to simply ask, in good faith, for the evidence. We know this isn't true based on social media alone, because Candace has publicly asked. Erika, TPUSA, Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, etc. to provide any proof or evidence they have and to have an open conversation publicly to answer the questions that so many people—including those who donated to TPUSA—have about the holes in their stories and the investigation. They have refused to provide anything. Andrew claims otherwise. He lied that Candace fought him on Tyler admitting to Lance that he could be seen on campus. Not fully true. Candace clearly said that it may be true but she doesn't THINK that it is and needs it to be fact-checked. Lies that Candace and many of us are “cooperating” with Unf** America. Exchanging replies on X is considered “cooperating” with “the Left.” Claims that Candace backtracked on stating Erika should go to jail for murdering Charlie Kirk. Not onyl did Candace never say this but she cleared this up in great detail during the "debate." The worst part??? He tricked the audience because NOW he is claiming that he won't release the alleged text message from Charlie until FRIDAY—despite previously making it seem like he was going to release it much today?! It gets worse. When you attempt to comment under the video, the disclaimer pops up and says that “Only channel subscribers of 20 minutes or longer can send messages.” Dude, what?! You also do not have the option to rewind his video while it’s live, which also is weird, so that it forces new viewers to have to go back and watch from the beginning if they are late (as most live viewers usually are). Didn't Andrew state in his humiliation ritual with Candace Owens that it's “wrong to benefit off of a good man's life/death”? This was just in the first 10-15 minutes...

So Andrew Wilson is currently live on YouTube after stating that he would release the text messages of Charlie Kirk claiming "the Left" was going to kill him (the very thing Erika Kirk said didn't exist months ago btw). There are a few important things to note about this live stream that I think you'd find disturbing. Outside of the incessant profanity (even for him) that he has used already, he has told SEVERAL LIES in just the first 10 minutes, including: Says that he reached out to Erika and TPUSA and that they IMMEDIATELY responded and were extremely cooperative in providing evidence to clear themselves and substantiate their alibis. He also claims that none of the people making allegations against them, such as Candace Owens , Stew Peters , and others, ever reached out ONCE to simply ask, in good faith, for the evidence. We know this isn't true based on social media alone, because Candace has publicly asked. Erika, TPUSA, Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, etc. to provide any proof or evidence they have and to have an open conversation publicly to answer the questions that so many people—including those who donated to TPUSA—have about the holes in their stories and the investigation. They have refused to provide anything. Andrew claims otherwise. He lied that Candace fought him on Tyler admitting to Lance that he could be seen on campus. Not fully true. Candace clearly said that it may be true but she doesn't THINK that it is and needs it to be fact-checked. Lies that Candace and many of us are “cooperating” with Unf** America. Exchanging replies on X is considered “cooperating” with “the Left.” Claims that Candace backtracked on stating Erika should go to jail for murdering Charlie Kirk. Not onyl did Candace never say this but she cleared this up in great detail during the "debate." The worst part??? He tricked the audience because NOW he is claiming that he won't release the alleged text message from Charlie until FRIDAY—despite previously making it seem like he was going to release it much today?! It gets worse. When you attempt to comment under the video, the disclaimer pops up and says that “Only channel subscribers of 20 minutes or longer can send messages.” Dude, what?! You also do not have the option to rewind his video while it’s live, which also is weird, so that it forces new viewers to have to go back and watch from the beginning if they are late (as most live viewers usually are). Didn't Andrew state in his humiliation ritual with Candace Owens that it's “wrong to benefit off of a good man's life/death”? This was just in the first 10-15 minutes...

DDGotAPodcast

222,726 views • 1 month ago