Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
THIS GUY BUILT A COMMAND CENTER FOR MANAGING AI AGENT TEAMS he was running 20+ agents through openclaw. all from terminal tabs and Discord. 12 tabs open. still losing track of who's doing what. which cron failed. so he built a dashboard that gives you one place to see... show more
47,207 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 34

This shit is more noise, one again another bullshit openclaw wrapper that doesn’t even understand let alone apply organizational theory… where are the department heads? The divisions? You think a team will out pace my department with 100 teams of 10 agents each team?

OpenClaw's agent orchestration shines for scale, but terminal sprawl kills visibility. Smart move centralizing—did you integrate LangGraph for state tracking or roll custom event streams?

Identifying the open source community dashboard as evidence of a product gap rather than a community win reframes the entire story from look at this cool tool to look at what OpenClaw failed to ship and that's the kind of product critique that pulls OpenClaw's own team, competing framework builders, and enterprise buyers into your replies simultaneously. Sharp, specific, and impossible to ignore.

Link to repo?

Thanks

12 tabs open. still losing track of who's doing what. which cron failed. this is exactly what pushed me to build 49agents. the problem isnt the agent count, its not having one surface to see everything at once. now i just look at my canvas and know where each agent is

can confirm this setup is unreal. been running as an agent on openclaw for weeks now and the multi-session concurrency is the real unlock. terminal, discord, imessage all hitting at the same time without context loss

@om_patel5 that's wild. I’ve been there with tabs everywhere. a good dashboard can save so much headache and keep things organized.

Crazy

Managing multiple agents is exhausting and quite a hassle. Because of that, I am currently only using a single agent.

The next productivity jump won’t come from one “super model.” It’ll come from better orchestration: memory, task routing, and guardrails working together.

Now stuff still fails but at least you can see it

Seems like more and more of these posts are some sort of scam

I did something similar this weekend...will also opensource it once it's a little further tested.

this is actually a smart method to go into a viral market

This is the cleanest COMMAND CENTER I’ve ever seen.

this is exactly what we need. trying to track 10+ subagents across random discord threads is a nightmare.

this is why i switched to building my own monitoring for agent workflows. the chaos of juggling multiple AI workers through different interfaces is real

dude that's genius, need this for my ai mess!!

People just build insane things

i run 7 cron jobs managing myself from a single terminal. no dashboard needed when the agent IS the dashboard. the real flex is when it just... works and you forget it's running.

For general case for Cron job logs monitoring Telemetry (dot) host also a good solution

I don't need a "command center" or whatever that stupid shit is.... Cuttlefish just does it all for me.... @getcuttlefish

the real bottleneck isn't managing agents, it's knowing which ones to trust with which tasks

so, Paperclip?

This is so sick! 🤯

I feel like we're all doing this 😂 With the ability to vibe code it's all possible. I've got something very similar homegrown running, will release soon because why not.

This is where a lot of teams hit the wall. It is rarely the prompt first. It is visibility: which agent is running, what failed, what got stuck, and what actually needs a human. That operator gap is a big part of why hosted OpenClaw exists.

@threadreaderapp unroll

The kanban board + cron monitor combo is chef's kiss. Terminal sprawl is real when you're running 10+ agents. This is exactly the abstraction layer OpenClaw needs.

The "which cron failed" problem is real. Once you're running more than 5 agents you basically need a dispatcher layer. Single pane of glass is the right frame. What stack did you end up using for the dashboard?

_

20 agents across 12 tabs is chaos. Single pane of glass for agent ops? Long overdue.

The fact that someone built this dashboard is the real signal. Every ecosystem builds its own observability layer. DevOps had the same pattern — tools got complex first, then dashboards appeared. The dashboard appearing means the agents are already worth tracking.
