Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This guy’s truck has a license plate that trips Flock cameras. He’s pulled over incessantly because police get notified that a car in the area has a warrant. He doesn’t have a warrant. Neither does his vehicle. Apparently Flock cameras can’t tell the difference between an O and a... show more

Magnetic Norse

61,913 subscribers

543,992 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

So police that we are supposed to trust with Flock cameras can Target you and break into your house without a warrant?

So police that we are supposed to trust with Flock cameras can Target you and break into your house without a warrant?

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

47,750 views • 8 days ago

San Jose, California residents file a lawsuit against the city for their deployment of Flock license plate reading cameras The people behind this lawsuit say the city has violated the Fourth Amendment by conducting surveillance without a warrant “Drivers have filed a class action suit against San Jose and its police department over the deployment of nearly 500 cameras, including by Flock safety” In California Flock camera data has been shared with the federal government as well as nonprofits (which is insane) Activists also say they are being used to track illegals in San Jose. So I guess this is one benefit

San Jose, California residents file a lawsuit against the city for their deployment of Flock license plate reading cameras The people behind this lawsuit say the city has violated the Fourth Amendment by conducting surveillance without a warrant “Drivers have filed a class action suit against San Jose and its police department over the deployment of nearly 500 cameras, including by Flock safety” In California Flock camera data has been shared with the federal government as well as nonprofits (which is insane) Activists also say they are being used to track illegals in San Jose. So I guess this is one benefit

Wall Street Apes

51,919 views • 4 months ago

A Massachusetts town said it has cut ties with Flock Safety and removed Flock automated license plate readers. This comes after a Louisiana police department fired an officer in a separate case in which officers allegedly used the surveillance cameras to get information on people they know. Flock Safety, a tech surveillance firm that makes AI-enabled cameras that scans and collects license plate information, announced new guardrails after amid growing public backlash over its surveillance technology. Read more:

A Massachusetts town said it has cut ties with Flock Safety and removed Flock automated license plate readers. This comes after a Louisiana police department fired an officer in a separate case in which officers allegedly used the surveillance cameras to get information on people they know. Flock Safety, a tech surveillance firm that makes AI-enabled cameras that scans and collects license plate information, announced new guardrails after amid growing public backlash over its surveillance technology. Read more:

ABC News

89,843 views • 10 days ago

“WHAT THE FLOCK?! 😂 This poor dude is just trying to drive home and the neighborhood ‘Flock’ camera keeps screaming ‘WARRANT! WARRANT!’ like it’s personally offended by his truck. Cops pull him over… twice… even though HE HAS NO WARRANT and the police chief knows it. But every time he rolls past one of these things? 🚨 Lights and sirens. FLOCK isn’t even an acronym, by the way — it’s just the brand name for these Big Brother license-plate spies that can’t tell a real criminal from a guy running errands. Surveillance state so advanced it’s harassing innocent people on autopilot. Watch till the end… you’re gonna lose it. What do you think — genius crime-fighting tool or expensive glitch factory? Drop your thoughts below 👇” Time for a new registration plate Kyle

ℳ𝒜𝒢𝒜_𝒳_𝒯𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒟𝒶𝒾𝓁𝓎 𝒩𝑒𝓌𝓈🇺🇸

36,619 views • 3 months ago

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

Orwell Day

25,952 views • 20 days ago

A man in New Mexico is out taking down Flock cameras and swapping them for a sign that reads “You’re welcome, Republic of New Mexico.” He called the cameras a “clear and present threat to public safety,” and says he’ll keep going even if they come after him with an arrest warrant.

A man in New Mexico is out taking down Flock cameras and swapping them for a sign that reads “You’re welcome, Republic of New Mexico.” He called the cameras a “clear and present threat to public safety,” and says he’ll keep going even if they come after him with an arrest warrant.

Died Suddenly

59,826 views • 1 month ago

NEW: Flock cameras wrongly flag innocent driver’s plate as stolen, leading to him being surrounded by police over a data entry error. A 15-year automotive journalist in Plymouth, Minnesota, experienced something he had never experienced. He was surrounded by multiple police officers while simply returning an Amazon package after Flock Safety cameras flagged his license plate as stolen. The alert came from a flawed NCIC entry where his California plate was incorrectly logged as “34 DTM” instead of the full “34 03 DTM.” Officers responded to the Flock hit and detained him for over an hour until he could prove the vehicle was legitimately his. Flock cameras are unconstitutional.

NEW: Flock cameras wrongly flag innocent driver’s plate as stolen, leading to him being surrounded by police over a data entry error. A 15-year automotive journalist in Plymouth, Minnesota, experienced something he had never experienced. He was surrounded by multiple police officers while simply returning an Amazon package after Flock Safety cameras flagged his license plate as stolen. The alert came from a flawed NCIC entry where his California plate was incorrectly logged as “34 DTM” instead of the full “34 03 DTM.” Officers responded to the Flock hit and detained him for over an hour until he could prove the vehicle was legitimately his. Flock cameras are unconstitutional.

The Facts Dude 🤙🏽

15,749 views • 1 month ago

American is extremely stressed out, she was just pulled over by a swarm of police cars. She was misidentified by Flock Safety cameras A cop car put on his lights, then 3 cop cars surrounded her vehicle. She was told her car had been identified by Flock Cameras and was “wanted for felony activity” “I was just pulled over by 3 cop cars while I was going 32 miles an hour, all because of a freaking flock camera. I got freaking flocked” She’s in a rental car, someone else has apparently used the vehicle in a crime, the flock camera identified the vehicle and because she is now using it, she is the one who got swarmed by police cars Just imagine how badly this could go…. An innocent person in a rental car being misidentified by Flock and then a police altercation happens and someone could get hurt “Can you imagine if I was pulled over by, like, an asshole type of cop that just aggressively pulled me out of the car and didn't take my word for it and immediately just put me in handcuffs? —- My friend that was in the car with us, he was like, "Dude, you should make a big, big deal about this to the dealership because that could've, that could've been so dangerous." I added multiple examples at the end where people have actually died from police pulling them over from wrong vehicle identification This is extremely dangerous and serious

American is extremely stressed out, she was just pulled over by a swarm of police cars. She was misidentified by Flock Safety cameras A cop car put on his lights, then 3 cop cars surrounded her vehicle. She was told her car had been identified by Flock Cameras and was “wanted for felony activity” “I was just pulled over by 3 cop cars while I was going 32 miles an hour, all because of a freaking flock camera. I got freaking flocked” She’s in a rental car, someone else has apparently used the vehicle in a crime, the flock camera identified the vehicle and because she is now using it, she is the one who got swarmed by police cars Just imagine how badly this could go…. An innocent person in a rental car being misidentified by Flock and then a police altercation happens and someone could get hurt “Can you imagine if I was pulled over by, like, an asshole type of cop that just aggressively pulled me out of the car and didn't take my word for it and immediately just put me in handcuffs? —- My friend that was in the car with us, he was like, "Dude, you should make a big, big deal about this to the dealership because that could've, that could've been so dangerous." I added multiple examples at the end where people have actually died from police pulling them over from wrong vehicle identification This is extremely dangerous and serious

Wall Street Apes

49,484 views • 1 day ago

Flock Safety Cameras are no longer being used just as license plate readers or traffic safety This flock camera is a playground, there is no traffic to monitor. I found local governments are now just placing Flock cameras in areas where they believe crime risks might be higher Which means they are no just straight up being used for mass surveillance of Americans without a warrant This is the surveillance and police state being established Again, these are no longer just traffic cameras they’re being used for surveillance Ban them nationwide

Flock Safety Cameras are no longer being used just as license plate readers or traffic safety This flock camera is a playground, there is no traffic to monitor. I found local governments are now just placing Flock cameras in areas where they believe crime risks might be higher Which means they are no just straight up being used for mass surveillance of Americans without a warrant This is the surveillance and police state being established Again, these are no longer just traffic cameras they’re being used for surveillance Ban them nationwide

Wall Street Apes

214,280 views • 2 months ago

A man came to this woman’s door & doesn’t say which Agency he’s with just that he has a warrant so she asks him to see the warrant & for ID & he still won’t tell her.She explains she has children in the home & needs to get them dressed to leave. Pt1 Do you think he’s an imposter?

A man came to this woman’s door & doesn’t say which Agency he’s with just that he has a warrant so she asks him to see the warrant & for ID & he still won’t tell her.She explains she has children in the home & needs to get them dressed to leave. Pt1 Do you think he’s an imposter?

Suzie rizzio

169,719 views • 9 months ago

An American patriot, Jevon Martinez, is being hailed as a hero across the country after declaring he will continue destroying Flock cameras, even as a judge prepares to issue an arrest warrant against him. He replaced the cameras with a sign reading, "You're welcome, Republic of New Mexico." REPORTER: "Do you have plans to take down these Flock cameras?" JEVON MARTINEZ: "Absolutely. They are a clear and present threat to public safety."

An American patriot, Jevon Martinez, is being hailed as a hero across the country after declaring he will continue destroying Flock cameras, even as a judge prepares to issue an arrest warrant against him. He replaced the cameras with a sign reading, "You're welcome, Republic of New Mexico." REPORTER: "Do you have plans to take down these Flock cameras?" JEVON MARTINEZ: "Absolutely. They are a clear and present threat to public safety."

Shadow of Ezra

200,029 views • 1 month ago

People are very uncomfortable with the fact that Flock Cameras investor Peter Thiel shared over 2,400 emails with Jeffrey Epstein and now Flock cameras are pointed at little kids playgrounds Just take this location, “Here's a flock camera pointed directly at the schoolyard, monitoring where each kid walks, how they get home, if there's an adult with them, which car is picking them up” But it even gets worse than this, I’ll provide in the video an area next to a kids water splash pad that has a huge amount of Flock cameras pointed right at it They say it’s because the cameras are there for enhanced security at high risk locations, but the connection to Epstein has people more than concerned about these camera placements

People are very uncomfortable with the fact that Flock Cameras investor Peter Thiel shared over 2,400 emails with Jeffrey Epstein and now Flock cameras are pointed at little kids playgrounds Just take this location, “Here's a flock camera pointed directly at the schoolyard, monitoring where each kid walks, how they get home, if there's an adult with them, which car is picking them up” But it even gets worse than this, I’ll provide in the video an area next to a kids water splash pad that has a huge amount of Flock cameras pointed right at it They say it’s because the cameras are there for enhanced security at high risk locations, but the connection to Epstein has people more than concerned about these camera placements

Wall Street Apes

200,275 views • 26 days ago

Americans even in rural towns are saying they are under surveillance by Flock Cameras “I pass 8 Flock cameras on the way to my kids' school — 2 stoplights, but 8 Flock cameras. I live in a rural county. I'm passing more surveillance cameras than I am businesses. That's insane” “So yeah, surveillance state coming to a rural county near you” This is the surveillance state being established Many people think there are just a few flock cameras being put up in counties, but that’s not the case. The amount of cameras would shock you Harris County Sheriff’s Office has access to 480 Flock cameras The greater Houston area has nearly 3,800 Flock cameras installed across the region This is mass surveillance

Americans even in rural towns are saying they are under surveillance by Flock Cameras “I pass 8 Flock cameras on the way to my kids' school — 2 stoplights, but 8 Flock cameras. I live in a rural county. I'm passing more surveillance cameras than I am businesses. That's insane” “So yeah, surveillance state coming to a rural county near you” This is the surveillance state being established Many people think there are just a few flock cameras being put up in counties, but that’s not the case. The amount of cameras would shock you Harris County Sheriff’s Office has access to 480 Flock cameras The greater Houston area has nearly 3,800 Flock cameras installed across the region This is mass surveillance

Wall Street Apes

133,188 views • 2 months ago

Joe Rogan: "I don't like this flock camera thing. I know it can protect people from crime. But I also know hundreds of cops have been busted for stalking people... You can't just spy on us and be a corporation and have access to all the license plates." Flock cameras are clearly useful for finding stolen cars, tracking suspects, and helping police arrest criminals. But a nationwide network that records and stores where millions of innocent Americans drive starts to look a lot like warrantless mass surveillance. There's a big difference between a cop observing your car in public and the government having access to a private company's searchable database of everyone’s movements without a warrant. At what point does it violate the Fourth Amendment?

Joe Rogan: "I don't like this flock camera thing. I know it can protect people from crime. But I also know hundreds of cops have been busted for stalking people... You can't just spy on us and be a corporation and have access to all the license plates." Flock cameras are clearly useful for finding stolen cars, tracking suspects, and helping police arrest criminals. But a nationwide network that records and stores where millions of innocent Americans drive starts to look a lot like warrantless mass surveillance. There's a big difference between a cop observing your car in public and the government having access to a private company's searchable database of everyone’s movements without a warrant. At what point does it violate the Fourth Amendment?

KanekoaTheGreat

527,660 views • 8 days ago

🚨MUST SEE: An Indian scammer makes the mistake of calling a police officer and tells him that he has a warrant out of his arrest. "Within 6 to 12 hours you will be behind the bars." "$400. That is the cancellation fee for your warrant."

🚨MUST SEE: An Indian scammer makes the mistake of calling a police officer and tells him that he has a warrant out of his arrest. "Within 6 to 12 hours you will be behind the bars." "$400. That is the cancellation fee for your warrant."

AmericanPapaBear™

67,714 views • 4 months ago

🚨 THE CEO OF FLOCK JUST SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD — AND PEOPLE ARE LOSING IT Remember when Flock cameras were only supposed to read license plates? Apparently that's not enough anymore. Now we're talking about AI that can find a vehicle from a simple description. Microphones that are always listening for so called "sounds of distress." Drones that can be launched automatically after a 911 call. And camera networks that can follow movement across entire cities. Every year the cameras get smarter. The databases get bigger. The AI gets more powerful. And the amount of information being collected keeps growing. Then came the comment that really got people's attention. The CEO behind Flock, one of the largest camera networks in America reportedly compared people who map camera locations to terrorists. Think about that for a second. The cameras aren't the problem. The people tracking the cameras are. Some people see a tool that makes communities safer. Others see a system that knows where you've been, where you are, and eventually where you're likely to go next. If mapping Flock cameras makes you a "terrorist," what does that make the people putting cameras everywhere?

🚨 THE CEO OF FLOCK JUST SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD — AND PEOPLE ARE LOSING IT Remember when Flock cameras were only supposed to read license plates? Apparently that's not enough anymore. Now we're talking about AI that can find a vehicle from a simple description. Microphones that are always listening for so called "sounds of distress." Drones that can be launched automatically after a 911 call. And camera networks that can follow movement across entire cities. Every year the cameras get smarter. The databases get bigger. The AI gets more powerful. And the amount of information being collected keeps growing. Then came the comment that really got people's attention. The CEO behind Flock, one of the largest camera networks in America reportedly compared people who map camera locations to terrorists. Think about that for a second. The cameras aren't the problem. The people tracking the cameras are. Some people see a tool that makes communities safer. Others see a system that knows where you've been, where you are, and eventually where you're likely to go next. If mapping Flock cameras makes you a "terrorist," what does that make the people putting cameras everywhere?

HustleBitch

317,837 views • 2 months ago

A new study shows that Flock AI cameras misread over 70% of license plates. We have also seen them frequently installed in areas with no cars. So maybe, just maybe they’re lying to us and they aren’t “license plate readers” after all… 🤷‍♂️🤔

A new study shows that Flock AI cameras misread over 70% of license plates. We have also seen them frequently installed in areas with no cars. So maybe, just maybe they’re lying to us and they aren’t “license plate readers” after all… 🤷‍♂️🤔

James Li

22,344 views • 10 days ago

🚨 Here I was on Fox News saying it loud and clear: Flock cameras and continuous license-plate tracking are a massive Fourth Amendment problem. No warrant. No probable cause. Just constant, warrantless surveillance of every car that drives by. I lived under this system in Beijing. Full cameras. Biometrics. Everything fed into a database and scored against a social credit system. It always starts out “for safety.” Everyone buys in. Then they use it against you. That’s exactly why the Founders wrote the Fourth Amendment. Fox News @ Night Trace Gallagher Fox News

🚨 Here I was on Fox News saying it loud and clear: Flock cameras and continuous license-plate tracking are a massive Fourth Amendment problem. No warrant. No probable cause. Just constant, warrantless surveillance of every car that drives by. I lived under this system in Beijing. Full cameras. Biometrics. Everything fed into a database and scored against a social credit system. It always starts out “for safety.” Everyone buys in. Then they use it against you. That’s exactly why the Founders wrote the Fourth Amendment. Fox News @ Night Trace Gallagher Fox News

Katie Zacharia

14,311 views • 22 days ago

Police Officers are using Flock cameras to stalk women when they see them in their cars ----- See a woman you like? Is she in her car? If you're a police officer you can just grab her license plate and use the Flock camera system to stalk her all over town. The Flock camera system will eventually lead to an innocent person being r*ped or worse, and probably much more than once, if it hasn't already happened. And what about the lies? Never forget that Flock representative Josh Thomas told investigative journalist Brendan Keefe from InvestigateTV that Flock cameras DO NOT track people.

Police Officers are using Flock cameras to stalk women when they see them in their cars ----- See a woman you like? Is she in her car? If you're a police officer you can just grab her license plate and use the Flock camera system to stalk her all over town. The Flock camera system will eventually lead to an innocent person being r*ped or worse, and probably much more than once, if it hasn't already happened. And what about the lies? Never forget that Flock representative Josh Thomas told investigative journalist Brendan Keefe from InvestigateTV that Flock cameras DO NOT track people.

Orwell Day

28,174 views • 8 days ago