Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
This insolent interviewer from Sky News disgracefully drew comparisons between the situation in Gaza and the Holocaust. Shame on her
392,641 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
10 Yorum

@SkyNews From 1933-41 German policy WAS to encourage Jews to migrate,by making their lives in Nazi Germany intolerable. Its fair to argue that is exactly what Mr Danon advocates and Israel is in fact doung

@SkyNews The word doesn't belong to Zionists. Stop the Holocaust in Gaza.

@SkyNews She knew the truth.

From 1933-41, the 🇩🇪 German government implemented a policy aimed at pressuring Jews to leave the country by creating unbearable living conditions for them. It is reasonable to argue that Mr. Danon supports a similar approach, and 🇮🇱 Israel is currently adopting such measures. Labeling it "voluntary immigration" is a dark joke when people are coerced into fleeing for their lives. This exodus is orchestrated through systematically cutting off essentials like water, electricity, and food. It's further fueled by ceasing humanitarian aid and launching assaults on the very foundations of their society - schools, hospitals, and even the paths they're told to escape through. And if that's not enough, they target journalists who dare to reveal these acts of barbarity. All under the guise of 'protecting civilians'. What a farce!

@SkyNews She was spot on. Why is it, any criticism of Israel, is considered antisemitism? Do they believe they cannot be criticized?

@SkyNews “Voluntary relocation” what a disgusting euphemism Forcing the displacement of Palestinians and calling it voluntary is absolutely appalling You should be ashamed of yourself How can you look at yourself in the mirror?

@SkyNews Voluntary relocation through coercion is illegal.

@SkyNews indeed the parallels are so clear. and it is not antisemitic to say so. she was absolutely correct to and we applaud her for speaking the truth that so many viewers think and feel 👏🏼

@SkyNews I don't see the difference tbh .

@SkyNews You disapprove of this perfectly reasonable analogy? Does the truth hurt that much?

