Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

This is a critical clip from the Sidney Powell proffer video obtained by Staci Burk. She was being asked about Obama Tier One CIA Asset Patrick Byrne, who she was reportedly (per Byrne) having an affair with at that time (roughly Dec 2020-April 2021). They bonded on the masheeens,... apparently. "We were usually talking about the machine stuff. I mean, he was, like, one of the few people that was in the orbit that understood that, because he had - Conan [Hayes] and Todd [Sanders] worked for Patrick." Conan Hayes is the reason why Tina Peters is in prison today. Kurt Olsen, Flynn, Byrne, Dr. Frank and Sheronna Bishop convinced Tina that Conan was a super duper white hat fed who "took down Backpage" and she therefore had to commit fraud with a fake ID to get Conan into the EMS room to take illegal images. Todd Sanders was on Byrne's jet with Conan that landed in Antrim County, Michigan right after Matthew S. DePerno, Esq. secured the court's permission to access the tabulators. Flynn was the one who arranged all that. Conan and Todd proceeded to railroad Deperno's case, authoring a factually deficient analysis for the court that was later rewritten by Jim Penrose. And those reports were discussed and featured in the document written by Christina Bobb and Emily Neuman that Flynn, Byrne, and Sidney tried to get Trump to sign on 12/18/20 to invoke the Insurrection Act. Had Trump signed that document, it would have directed the military to seize the tabulators and ballots in the 7 swing counties. Undoubtedly, they would have started with a hand recount. If it was machine vote flipping like Byrne, Powell, ASOG, Flynn, Mary Fanning, Lindell, Patrick Colbeck, etc. PSYOPed us all into believing, a hand recount would have exposed it. But since there was a ballot for every vote, a hand recount would have confirmed the tabulator tally. Before getting any further with the investigation, it would have been labeled a military coup attempt to overthrow a legitimate election, and he would have been tried for treason. In my view, this was all a set up by these Flynn-linked (and Russia-linked?) insurgents. One of their many #PlotsAgainstThePresident. Dan Bongino Donald J. Trump Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅 Susie Wiles Attorney General Pamela Bondi FBI Director Kash Patel FBI Washington Field FBI CIA Director John Ratcliffe CIAshow more

Scott McMahan

17,897 subscribers

14,781 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This clip, which appears to have been recorded prior to Tina Peters' August 2024 trial, shows admitted Obama Tier One CIA Asset Patrick Byrne making some stunning admissions: 1. He had already paid over $1M at that point in Tina's legal defense. 2. He caused Tina to fire an attorney because the defense he was crafting showed exactly what I've been arguing - Kurt Olsen (and CIA Asset Byrne, who was paying Olsen) coerced her to commit the crimes she committed. 3. He caused Tina to hire Stefanie Lambert, who has boasted about devising Peters' disastrously bad legal defense, which sought to make her trial a circus of false claims about the masheeens in 2020 instead of a defense of the charges against her. It is my opinion that Tina would be free today had Tina not been mind controlled by the Byrne/Flynn intel network and stayed with her prior attorney, Doug Richards.

This clip, which appears to have been recorded prior to Tina Peters' August 2024 trial, shows admitted Obama Tier One CIA Asset Patrick Byrne making some stunning admissions: 1. He had already paid over $1M at that point in Tina's legal defense. 2. He caused Tina to fire an attorney because the defense he was crafting showed exactly what I've been arguing - Kurt Olsen (and CIA Asset Byrne, who was paying Olsen) coerced her to commit the crimes she committed. 3. He caused Tina to hire Stefanie Lambert, who has boasted about devising Peters' disastrously bad legal defense, which sought to make her trial a circus of false claims about the masheeens in 2020 instead of a defense of the charges against her. It is my opinion that Tina would be free today had Tina not been mind controlled by the Byrne/Flynn intel network and stayed with her prior attorney, Doug Richards.

Scott McMahan

147,611 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨After the election, Patrick Byrne implicates himself, America Project, Mike Flynn, Donald Trump, Elon Musk and others in a project to “stop their go fast switch” with the “hand of God.” Byrne says he was funder & Mike Flynn was architect of a plan to surveil & obtain “a map of their cheating… and bring their knowledge to tightening up the election system.” Tina Peters, who breached the Colorado voting system software was deeply connected to the America Project, which is currently advocating for her release from prison. There were breaches in several other swing states. They had the software. I note that Byrne says the “go fast switch” would have been executed around “6PM” which is about when the Russian bomb threats were called in. This is part of a disturbing pattern of only oligarchy, others close to this group, and Polymarket, having a strangely confident attitude that this would be a landslide. As Byrne notes, as a result of the unimaginable final vote totals, “dissent was crushed” because Trump has a “mandate” and won both the popular vote and the electoral vote more than Biden won over him. All of this is consistent with Spoonamore: On a bike? Get a like.’s investigation into potential tabulator hacks. Something’s wrong here and it needs to be taken seriously.

🚨After the election, Patrick Byrne implicates himself, America Project, Mike Flynn, Donald Trump, Elon Musk and others in a project to “stop their go fast switch” with the “hand of God.” Byrne says he was funder & Mike Flynn was architect of a plan to surveil & obtain “a map of their cheating… and bring their knowledge to tightening up the election system.” Tina Peters, who breached the Colorado voting system software was deeply connected to the America Project, which is currently advocating for her release from prison. There were breaches in several other swing states. They had the software. I note that Byrne says the “go fast switch” would have been executed around “6PM” which is about when the Russian bomb threats were called in. This is part of a disturbing pattern of only oligarchy, others close to this group, and Polymarket, having a strangely confident attitude that this would be a landslide. As Byrne notes, as a result of the unimaginable final vote totals, “dissent was crushed” because Trump has a “mandate” and won both the popular vote and the electoral vote more than Biden won over him. All of this is consistent with Spoonamore: On a bike? Get a like.’s investigation into potential tabulator hacks. Something’s wrong here and it needs to be taken seriously.

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

912,433 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

‼️I REMEMBER‼️ the ReAwaken tour that General Flynn went on with Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Lin Wood and Mike Lindell, etc. - which is where both the clip in the original post came from and this one below. 👉🏼 that I know of, Flynn is the only "player" that ever came out and claimed publicly that we were a Republic, again - if we could keep it - and he wasn't lying. 👉🏼 the psyops that have surround General Flynn were a post-J6 test - having to do with loyalty that only anons who were there from the start would understand. 👉🏼 IMHO - there are 2 Flynn narratives, by design - one from before he was surprised and publicly asked about Q and the Military by X22 Report's "Dave" shortly after the J6 purge - and the "other" narrative that started after that. 👉🏼 I never cared either way because it was all a distraction for normies while those who remained loyal to the plan continued with the mission - to this day.

‼️I REMEMBER‼️ the ReAwaken tour that General Flynn went on with Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Lin Wood and Mike Lindell, etc. - which is where both the clip in the original post came from and this one below. 👉🏼 that I know of, Flynn is the only "player" that ever came out and claimed publicly that we were a Republic, again - if we could keep it - and he wasn't lying. 👉🏼 the psyops that have surround General Flynn were a post-J6 test - having to do with loyalty that only anons who were there from the start would understand. 👉🏼 IMHO - there are 2 Flynn narratives, by design - one from before he was surprised and publicly asked about Q and the Military by X22 Report's "Dave" shortly after the J6 purge - and the "other" narrative that started after that. 👉🏼 I never cared either way because it was all a distraction for normies while those who remained loyal to the plan continued with the mission - to this day.

The Rubber Duck ™

51,902 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Here is: FBI Director Kash Patel sums up in just about 45 seconds what took two years to prove—without a shadow of a doubt—that Barack Obama conspired with a foreign power to overthrow the United States government. FBI Director Kash Patel “It took me two years of my life to prove the following: that a political party in the United States of America, in the 21st century, would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake, unverified information, funnel that not just to the intelligence community but to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those packaged lies they had paid for with campaign finance funds and go into a secret surveillance court to illegally spy on their opponent to be the next president of the United States. I think that was 45 seconds. That took two years of my life. And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal, that the FBI did not provide exculpatory evidence, and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications.” It was a coup. It was treachery. It was sedition. It was treason. It was the overthrow of the United States government.

Here is: FBI Director Kash Patel sums up in just about 45 seconds what took two years to prove—without a shadow of a doubt—that Barack Obama conspired with a foreign power to overthrow the United States government. FBI Director Kash Patel “It took me two years of my life to prove the following: that a political party in the United States of America, in the 21st century, would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake, unverified information, funnel that not just to the intelligence community but to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those packaged lies they had paid for with campaign finance funds and go into a secret surveillance court to illegally spy on their opponent to be the next president of the United States. I think that was 45 seconds. That took two years of my life. And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal, that the FBI did not provide exculpatory evidence, and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications.” It was a coup. It was treachery. It was sedition. It was treason. It was the overthrow of the United States government.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

231,613 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking on retired Indian Army Major Vikrant Jaitly's case, Vikrant's wife Charul Jaitly's lawyer, Major Sudhanshu Pandey, says, "Vikrant was an ex-army officer... In 2016-17, due to family circumstances, he took premature retirement, and since then, he has set up his own work and has been settled in Dubai, where he is working... What we have been told is that there were some national security issues and cyber issues in respect of some different companies with whom Vikrant may have had some dealings... His wife was trying to find out what exactly had happened... She got in contact with the Ministry of External Affairs; everything was explained to them; Vikrant was given counsellor access; and thereafter, it was said that there are some investigations going on in respect of the case against different people, and during that investigation, it would be necessary for Vikrant to be there... Celina was the one whom she contacted first when she got to know about this, and she did not, at that point in time, come forward in any manner to help—at least, any visible help did not come from them. The case happened on the 6th of September 2023... She followed the protocol... and went about the case the way she was advised... She decided to wait for the case to get over... While Charul was never informed by Celina that she had decided to take any legal recourse in this matter, it would have been better if she had consulted Charul and discussed that this is what she was going to do about this. Charul would have come forward, and they could have taken steps that were in the best interest of Vikrant... The reason for filing the case is that if this was something that was motivated by her genuine concern for her brother, she should have consulted us... But to say that she is not being given information or that his wife is not giving her information, we actually strongly rebut because there are absolutely no such reasons. Charul was going to everybody whom she had a hope would be able to help Vikrant... We have been told that some investigation is in the process for which he is required, and when it is over, we will be able to have a better insight into the disposal of Vikrant." (06.12)

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking on retired Indian Army Major Vikrant Jaitly's case, Vikrant's wife Charul Jaitly's lawyer, Major Sudhanshu Pandey, says, "Vikrant was an ex-army officer... In 2016-17, due to family circumstances, he took premature retirement, and since then, he has set up his own work and has been settled in Dubai, where he is working... What we have been told is that there were some national security issues and cyber issues in respect of some different companies with whom Vikrant may have had some dealings... His wife was trying to find out what exactly had happened... She got in contact with the Ministry of External Affairs; everything was explained to them; Vikrant was given counsellor access; and thereafter, it was said that there are some investigations going on in respect of the case against different people, and during that investigation, it would be necessary for Vikrant to be there... Celina was the one whom she contacted first when she got to know about this, and she did not, at that point in time, come forward in any manner to help—at least, any visible help did not come from them. The case happened on the 6th of September 2023... She followed the protocol... and went about the case the way she was advised... She decided to wait for the case to get over... While Charul was never informed by Celina that she had decided to take any legal recourse in this matter, it would have been better if she had consulted Charul and discussed that this is what she was going to do about this. Charul would have come forward, and they could have taken steps that were in the best interest of Vikrant... The reason for filing the case is that if this was something that was motivated by her genuine concern for her brother, she should have consulted us... But to say that she is not being given information or that his wife is not giving her information, we actually strongly rebut because there are absolutely no such reasons. Charul was going to everybody whom she had a hope would be able to help Vikrant... We have been told that some investigation is in the process for which he is required, and when it is over, we will be able to have a better insight into the disposal of Vikrant." (06.12)

ANI

41,692 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Errol Flynn and Olivia de Havilland in a scene from “The Adventures of Robin Hood” (1938), directed by Michael Curtiz. During one fight sequence, Errol Flynn was jabbed by an actor who was using an unprotected sword ― Flynn asked him why he didn't have a guard on the point. The other player apologised and explained that director Michael Curtiz had instructed him to remove the safety feature in order to make the action “more exciting”. Flynn reportedly climbed up a gantry where Curtiz was standing next to the camera, took him by the throat and asked him if he found that “exciting enough.”

Errol Flynn and Olivia de Havilland in a scene from “The Adventures of Robin Hood” (1938), directed by Michael Curtiz. During one fight sequence, Errol Flynn was jabbed by an actor who was using an unprotected sword ― Flynn asked him why he didn't have a guard on the point. The other player apologised and explained that director Michael Curtiz had instructed him to remove the safety feature in order to make the action “more exciting”. Flynn reportedly climbed up a gantry where Curtiz was standing next to the camera, took him by the throat and asked him if he found that “exciting enough.”

Hollywood Golden Age of Cinema

617,845 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I wanted to follow up on this Judy Woodruff clip after I confirmed something. In this clip, Woodruff said that reporting—without citing which reporting—had revealed that former President Trump had been pushing Prime Minister Netanyahu not to accept a hostage deal because that would help Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign. Obviously, this was a major allegation. It would mean that Netanyahu was sacrificing the lives of hostages and the security of Israel for Donald Trump’s candidacy and that Donald Trump was trying to keep the hostages, and civilians in Gaza, in harm’s way for political purposes. When people pushed back against her, Woodruff tweeted that she had relied on Axios and Reuters reporting on the matter but had missed that Trump and Netanyahu had denied this reporting. She apologized for the oversight. But her tweet was inaccurate. As I noted last week, Axios and Reuters never reported that Netanyahu was being urged by Trump not to take a hostage deal. They had just reported that Trump and Netanyahu spoke about Gaza. But to be sure, I went back to check a few things and also asked Axios for comment. First, the Reuters report that Woodruff cited was just a pickup of an Axios story. The Axios story Woodruff cited had been updated to reflect Netanyahu’s denial that he and Trump ever discussed Gaza and a hostage deal. (I have linked to both reports in this thread) A spokesperson for Axios confirmed that they NEVER reported that Trump was said to have been discouraging Netanyahu from taking the deal. Not only were Woodruff’s on-air comments inaccurate, but her apology tweet also said that Axios (and Reuters) reported something that they never did. Neither publication even stepped into the area that she suggested. I have followed up with PBS for comment.

I wanted to follow up on this Judy Woodruff clip after I confirmed something. In this clip, Woodruff said that reporting—without citing which reporting—had revealed that former President Trump had been pushing Prime Minister Netanyahu not to accept a hostage deal because that would help Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign. Obviously, this was a major allegation. It would mean that Netanyahu was sacrificing the lives of hostages and the security of Israel for Donald Trump’s candidacy and that Donald Trump was trying to keep the hostages, and civilians in Gaza, in harm’s way for political purposes. When people pushed back against her, Woodruff tweeted that she had relied on Axios and Reuters reporting on the matter but had missed that Trump and Netanyahu had denied this reporting. She apologized for the oversight. But her tweet was inaccurate. As I noted last week, Axios and Reuters never reported that Netanyahu was being urged by Trump not to take a hostage deal. They had just reported that Trump and Netanyahu spoke about Gaza. But to be sure, I went back to check a few things and also asked Axios for comment. First, the Reuters report that Woodruff cited was just a pickup of an Axios story. The Axios story Woodruff cited had been updated to reflect Netanyahu’s denial that he and Trump ever discussed Gaza and a hostage deal. (I have linked to both reports in this thread) A spokesperson for Axios confirmed that they NEVER reported that Trump was said to have been discouraging Netanyahu from taking the deal. Not only were Woodruff’s on-air comments inaccurate, but her apology tweet also said that Axios (and Reuters) reported something that they never did. Neither publication even stepped into the area that she suggested. I have followed up with PBS for comment.

Yashar Ali 🐘

1,179,529 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

After the 2024 Election, but before President Trump returned to the White House, he stated that he will not turn the page and concede the 2020 Election. I do not believe the 2020 Election is over. I understand I sound crazy to some people, and trust me, I understand why. But, ever since President Trump first walked down the golden escalator with Melania, he has been signaling to us what is to come, and he has yet to be wrong about any of it. I believe the 2020 Election was the biggest sting operation in history, and that the truth is finally about to be revealed to the world. President Trump also put the entire UNselect J6 committee on notice, especially Liz Cheney and Benny Thompson. They destroyed all of their so called evidence about January 6. Why would they do that? You know why they did that, as there is only one reason why they would do that. They are all guilty. Their evidence was all fabricated. Their job was to cover up the fact that what happened on January 6 was a cover up of the stolen election, and they used FBI agents and paid Antifa members to dress up as MAGA and breach the Capitol building, setting up a fake insurrection in order to force the certification of their fraudulent election. The real insurrection took place on November 3rd, 2020. Lastly, and this should not be ignored, when she said that the Democrats have control of the White House, Trump sort of questioned her, making it stand out. If Trump caught them all, and he never conceded, isn’t it reasonable to think that maybe the military got involved to safeguard the country from “Biden”starting WW3, which is what the Democrats wanted? Don’t ever forget about the Dash. The dash matters. 45 - 47 (45,46,47) Unfortunately, it had to be this way. It was the safest option. Us United was their greatest fear, and they did an amazing job of dividing us at that time via the Mockingbird Media. There would have been a civil war. Trump would have looked like the dictator they all said he was. The people needed to be shown, not told.

After the 2024 Election, but before President Trump returned to the White House, he stated that he will not turn the page and concede the 2020 Election. I do not believe the 2020 Election is over. I understand I sound crazy to some people, and trust me, I understand why. But, ever since President Trump first walked down the golden escalator with Melania, he has been signaling to us what is to come, and he has yet to be wrong about any of it. I believe the 2020 Election was the biggest sting operation in history, and that the truth is finally about to be revealed to the world. President Trump also put the entire UNselect J6 committee on notice, especially Liz Cheney and Benny Thompson. They destroyed all of their so called evidence about January 6. Why would they do that? You know why they did that, as there is only one reason why they would do that. They are all guilty. Their evidence was all fabricated. Their job was to cover up the fact that what happened on January 6 was a cover up of the stolen election, and they used FBI agents and paid Antifa members to dress up as MAGA and breach the Capitol building, setting up a fake insurrection in order to force the certification of their fraudulent election. The real insurrection took place on November 3rd, 2020. Lastly, and this should not be ignored, when she said that the Democrats have control of the White House, Trump sort of questioned her, making it stand out. If Trump caught them all, and he never conceded, isn’t it reasonable to think that maybe the military got involved to safeguard the country from “Biden”starting WW3, which is what the Democrats wanted? Don’t ever forget about the Dash. The dash matters. 45 - 47 (45,46,47) Unfortunately, it had to be this way. It was the safest option. Us United was their greatest fear, and they did an amazing job of dividing us at that time via the Mockingbird Media. There would have been a civil war. Trump would have looked like the dictator they all said he was. The people needed to be shown, not told.

RealAF Patriot

27,832 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

BREAKING: President Trump speaks out about the Department of Justice's move to drop the Reflecting Pool vandalism case. "That was the one mistake with the reflecting pond, they hadn't put up the cameras yet... If they would have had them up, we would have had a lot of- it would have been a lot easier. And I was disappointed with Jeanine Pirro, really disappointed with Jeanine Pirro. She folded like an umbrella and people get away with things, and it's a disgrace."

BREAKING: President Trump speaks out about the Department of Justice's move to drop the Reflecting Pool vandalism case. "That was the one mistake with the reflecting pond, they hadn't put up the cameras yet... If they would have had them up, we would have had a lot of- it would have been a lot easier. And I was disappointed with Jeanine Pirro, really disappointed with Jeanine Pirro. She folded like an umbrella and people get away with things, and it's a disgrace."

Fox News

669,546 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

GEN. FLYNN STATES THAT MILITARY TRIBUNALS SHOULD BE EXPLORED for the Obama Russian collusion coup against Trump. Documents prove that Barrack Obama knew the Russian collusion narrative was a hoax. Obama was involved in manufacturing and politicizing the intelligence to create the Trump-Russia collusion canard. Tulsi Gabbard announced that they have the evidence required to prosecute Obama and his administration tied to an enormous grand conspiracy coup against President Trump and crimes of treason. Gen. Flynn also stated that the DOJ should confiscate the passports of all individuals involved so fleeing the country is not an option to avoid prosecution. There is still classified information that they possess that pins every single one of them to crimes of treason along with crimes that were previously ignored or covered up, and claimed that there are more names to be exposed that haven't even been dropped yet. This was treason and an attempt at an orchestrated coup, directed by Obama and others to overthrow the U.S. government. The Trump administration have been working on this entire case in secret. Treason is not protected by immunity. Get ready ladies and gentleman. The trigger will be pulled and things will get ugly. But this must be done and these people MUST be held accountable.

GEN. FLYNN STATES THAT MILITARY TRIBUNALS SHOULD BE EXPLORED for the Obama Russian collusion coup against Trump. Documents prove that Barrack Obama knew the Russian collusion narrative was a hoax. Obama was involved in manufacturing and politicizing the intelligence to create the Trump-Russia collusion canard. Tulsi Gabbard announced that they have the evidence required to prosecute Obama and his administration tied to an enormous grand conspiracy coup against President Trump and crimes of treason. Gen. Flynn also stated that the DOJ should confiscate the passports of all individuals involved so fleeing the country is not an option to avoid prosecution. There is still classified information that they possess that pins every single one of them to crimes of treason along with crimes that were previously ignored or covered up, and claimed that there are more names to be exposed that haven't even been dropped yet. This was treason and an attempt at an orchestrated coup, directed by Obama and others to overthrow the U.S. government. The Trump administration have been working on this entire case in secret. Treason is not protected by immunity. Get ready ladies and gentleman. The trigger will be pulled and things will get ugly. But this must be done and these people MUST be held accountable.

The SCIF

158,450 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Trump said that Russia could have ended the war against Ukraine on the very first day if not for a Russian general who sent tanks to Kyiv "through the swamp." 🗣"They got stuck in the swamp, almost like in quicksand. It was mud, like quicksand. They could not move. If that general had just gone straight on the concrete highway, that speaks volumes. That is why war is always associated with risk. If he had just moved straight on the highway to the city, they would have been in Kyiv in four hours, and Ukraine would have been able to do nothing. This war would have ended in one day. This was four and a half years ago. It was a huge mistake. The general decided to go through the field instead of the road and highway," he said I know Ukrainian roads are far from perfect but calling E40 highway (Kyiv-Chernihiv) “swamp” is a bit too much… Kyiv, Brovary direction, March 2022

Trump said that Russia could have ended the war against Ukraine on the very first day if not for a Russian general who sent tanks to Kyiv "through the swamp." 🗣"They got stuck in the swamp, almost like in quicksand. It was mud, like quicksand. They could not move. If that general had just gone straight on the concrete highway, that speaks volumes. That is why war is always associated with risk. If he had just moved straight on the highway to the city, they would have been in Kyiv in four hours, and Ukraine would have been able to do nothing. This war would have ended in one day. This was four and a half years ago. It was a huge mistake. The general decided to go through the field instead of the road and highway," he said I know Ukrainian roads are far from perfect but calling E40 highway (Kyiv-Chernihiv) “swamp” is a bit too much… Kyiv, Brovary direction, March 2022

Cloooud |🇺🇦

422,169 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

With the bombshell news that FBI Director Kash Patel has provided Chuck Grassley with recently found documents showing CCP interference in our 2020 election, let me remind you what General Mike Flynn said on December 18, 2020: “With all of the egregious behavior that we have seen on our election security, we cannot stand for foreign influence, which we have direct evidence of foreign influence. We also have evidence now from other countries, other foreign partners who have evidence. In fact, they were watching the attacks on our election system, our election process on the 3rd of November (2020) and they are willing to provide that directly to the President.” General Flynn was right. Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator was right. Rudy W. Giuliani was right. Donald J. Trump was right. WE WERE ALL RIGHT! Now we need to fully expose it so the rest of the world knows that our elections are broken. Prosecutions need to happen.

With the bombshell news that FBI Director Kash Patel has provided Chuck Grassley with recently found documents showing CCP interference in our 2020 election, let me remind you what General Mike Flynn said on December 18, 2020: “With all of the egregious behavior that we have seen on our election security, we cannot stand for foreign influence, which we have direct evidence of foreign influence. We also have evidence now from other countries, other foreign partners who have evidence. In fact, they were watching the attacks on our election system, our election process on the 3rd of November (2020) and they are willing to provide that directly to the President.” General Flynn was right. Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator was right. Rudy W. Giuliani was right. Donald J. Trump was right. WE WERE ALL RIGHT! Now we need to fully expose it so the rest of the world knows that our elections are broken. Prosecutions need to happen.

TheStormHasArrived

231,840 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Scott Jennings puts it’s perfectly. He calmly reminds the deranged Libs that the Epstein story is about Bill Clinton and the Dems, and it’s been that way for 15+ years. Epstein was a Democrat donor, and directly assisted the Dems in trying to damage Trump. Epstein was literally feeding lines to Democrat politicians in the middle of congressional hearings via text. They had an Epstein group chat. Epstein was part of the Democrat elite. This story has been about Clinton and the Dems the entire time. The Dems used to think so also, considering they called this a conspiracy theory for the last decade, until a few months ago. If there was every anything about Trump, it would have been released before he reached the bottom of the escalator in 2015, the Comey FBI would have leaked it, and the Dems would have brought it up at some point while Biden was in office. But none of that happened. Why? Because Epstein leads to the Dems, and people like myself have been trying to warn the world about it for 10+ years. We were called conspiracy theorists. The Dems/MSM covered up this story for ov r a decade, and now they think they are all the sudden the experts on the subject? Adorable.

Scott Jennings puts it’s perfectly. He calmly reminds the deranged Libs that the Epstein story is about Bill Clinton and the Dems, and it’s been that way for 15+ years. Epstein was a Democrat donor, and directly assisted the Dems in trying to damage Trump. Epstein was literally feeding lines to Democrat politicians in the middle of congressional hearings via text. They had an Epstein group chat. Epstein was part of the Democrat elite. This story has been about Clinton and the Dems the entire time. The Dems used to think so also, considering they called this a conspiracy theory for the last decade, until a few months ago. If there was every anything about Trump, it would have been released before he reached the bottom of the escalator in 2015, the Comey FBI would have leaked it, and the Dems would have brought it up at some point while Biden was in office. But none of that happened. Why? Because Epstein leads to the Dems, and people like myself have been trying to warn the world about it for 10+ years. We were called conspiracy theorists. The Dems/MSM covered up this story for ov r a decade, and now they think they are all the sudden the experts on the subject? Adorable.

Clandestine

186,024 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This woman called for an Uber so that she could go and visit her friend, when the Uber showed up, it wasn’t the one in the picture on the app, but it can’t be a coincidence that it was this one that showed up. A moment before it showed up, a man walked by, and seemed to circle her, once the fake Uber showed up, the man who circled her tried to force her into the car, she managed to fight them off and got away. Could the actual Uber that she was assigned to in the app have been involved in this, how else would could this have happened?

This woman called for an Uber so that she could go and visit her friend, when the Uber showed up, it wasn’t the one in the picture on the app, but it can’t be a coincidence that it was this one that showed up. A moment before it showed up, a man walked by, and seemed to circle her, once the fake Uber showed up, the man who circled her tried to force her into the car, she managed to fight them off and got away. Could the actual Uber that she was assigned to in the app have been involved in this, how else would could this have happened?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,004,161 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten