Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This is a useful clarification...

186,912 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

36 Kommentare

Profilbild von Sol War Veteran
Sol War Veteranvor 3 Monaten

If it's a random guy saying something on Tik Tok it's gotta be useful. Amiright? 140k people follow this garbage posting clown show.

Profilbild von Kerry Burgess
Kerry Burgessvor 3 Monaten

Unless you would care to rebut anything in the clip, you can sit your boring, lazy, uninformed ass down, Sol War. And X can carry on ignoring your irrelevant opinions on anything...

Profilbild von Karen, Esq
Karen, Esqvor 3 Monaten

He lost me at master of holocaust studies. A stooge of lies that send most $ to Israel cannot be spokesperson simultaneously for justice. He is a Zionist through and through.

Profilbild von Dana🌺
Dana🌺vor 3 Monaten

The world needs to be held accountable, we need to put everything back together for the Palestinians, they’ve lost so much and a lifetime isn’t even enough.

Profilbild von Seraphim of Snark
Seraphim of Snarkvor 3 Monaten

This is a useful graphic of clarification.

Profilbild von Teresa Nacli
Teresa Naclivor 3 Monaten

#Israel 🇮🇱 is a terrorist state, stealing and killin since 67 with @Netanyahu war criminal ! ENOUGH 🇮🇱 get out of 🇵🇸🇸🇾🇱🇧 land stealers

Profilbild von innerTension
innerTensionvor 3 Monaten

So let's assume that it's legal for you to bomb a restaurant, or a bus, or to invade a country and kill 800 civilians in a handful of hours. You think that it's fine just because it's legal?

Profilbild von Kerry Burgess
Kerry Burgessvor 3 Monaten

So lets assume someone bombs a restaurant, or bus, or invades a country and kills some of it's soldiers. Is it fine for the country being attacked to mass murder hundreds of it's own citizens and then mass murder hundreds of thousands of innocent civilains and commit genocide in the country that it is illegally occupying in retaliation?

Profilbild von innerTension
innerTensionvor 3 Monaten

Israel did not kill their own, as I am sure you know, IDF showed up hours after the incident occurred, which means Hamas were already killing for hours, there are many videos online. It is not a genocide because the aim is not to destroy Palestinian people.

Profilbild von Kerry Burgess
Kerry Burgessvor 3 Monaten

Of course, they killed their own. Why do you think they buried all those cars that were destroyed by Apache gunship fire?

Profilbild von innerTension
innerTensionvor 3 Monaten

Bro I am not watching Chunky Yogurt and Ana Armenian-Employed-by-Turks talk for 8 minutes. How is it possible that IDF did not respond to the attack for hours and at the same time they were the ones who killed civilians when there are videos with Hamas inside of Kibbutzim. Retard

Profilbild von mjc
mjcvor 3 Monaten

@KerryBurgess there are israeli accounts of israeli forces attacking them in the kibbutzim

Profilbild von innerTension
innerTensionvor 3 Monaten

@KerryBurgess Yes, there is one account about a tank shell blowing up a building.

Profilbild von Karen, Esq
Karen, Esqvor 3 Monaten

Anyone that perpetuates the hollycaust is by default A ZIONIST. He or she is supporting 1. the false reason for establishment of Israel, just like Christian Zionists. 2. the biggest sympathy-coercion on the West to exact bombs and $ for Israel, just like Christian Zionism. Holocaustianity is Zionism, Just like Christian Zionism.

Profilbild von 🍿🦋 PopCultured4 🎮💚
🍿🦋 PopCultured4 🎮💚vor 3 Monaten

Australia has forgotten why the UN Charter and international laws were created despite a bi-annual commemoration with chants of "Lest We Forget" (ANZAC & Rememberance Day)...

Profilbild von Nathaniel
Nathanielvor 3 Monaten

targeting civilians isn’t resistance right? also israel is recognized by international law right? a lot of how you frame this is pretty vague so i just want to clarify.

Profilbild von Niccolo
Niccolovor 3 Monaten

He has an undergrad degree from tik tok university and a masters from trust me bro college

Profilbild von Dov Baër דוב בער
Dov Baër דוב בערvor 3 Monaten

Jews are indigenous to Israel. Arabs arrived as colonizers and went on to steal the entire Middle East and North Africa. Jews were oppressed for centuries, so in 1948 we rebelled. Because oppressed people have the right to resist. Zionism is resistance. Vive la résistance!

Profilbild von Bartleby
Bartlebyvor 3 Monaten

Judas, is that you? Long time no see. You haven't changed a bit.

Profilbild von Scott
Scottvor 3 Monaten

The world needs clarification like this. Not 'clarification' with intent to deceive & manipulate, like that of our media/politico masters who reign over us like untouchable luxury-yacht-dwelling tyrants. But simple truth clarity said a million times or more

Profilbild von OFF GEEKKIDD
OFF GEEKKIDDvor 3 Monaten

*A message that, normally, passionately Zionists alone cannot understand.

Profilbild von William B.
William B.vor 3 Monaten

Everything he just stated is objectively true and accurate. Oh, and there's this!

Profilbild von David Caldicott
David Caldicottvor 3 Monaten

This would be most of us right now..

Profilbild von Rdawg
Rdawgvor 3 Monaten

lol…Israel has no legal right to self defense….sure Jan. Proving the UN is worthless.

Profilbild von Maryam
Maryamvor 3 Monaten

👏

Profilbild von Mary
Maryvor 3 Monaten

Note who did not ratify 1977 Protocols.

Profilbild von WorldFirst🕊️🌎❤️
WorldFirst🕊️🌎❤️vor 3 Monaten

@OlivesStones Critical to know.

Profilbild von I Am
I Amvor 3 Monaten

So Isreal doesn’t have the right to exist…. Thank you you’ve made my point

Profilbild von al
alvor 3 Monaten

Exposed these genocidal maniacs brother ✊🏼🇵🇸

Profilbild von Rishad Khan 🇨🇦🇦🇺
Rishad Khan 🇨🇦🇦🇺vor 3 Monaten

@tammym2005 Well said👏👏👏

Profilbild von Steven Hoffman
Steven Hoffmanvor 3 Monaten

’ video is misleading and biased. It correctly cites Additional Protocol I (1977) and certain UNGA resolutions recognizing armed struggles for self-determination, but draws incorrect conclusions from them. Protocol I and the Geneva Conventions require all parties to follow the same rules: civilians cannot be targeted, attacks must distinguish military from civilian targets, and war crimes (deliberate civilian massacres, hostage-taking, etc.) are prohibited—no “resistance exception” exists. Presenting “genocide” as undisputed fact (the ICJ case has no final merits ruling) and claiming critics have “no right” to question tactics is not law—it’s selective advocacy. Consistent IHL demands symmetric scrutiny of all violations, not one-sided immunity.

Profilbild von realexpatjourno 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
realexpatjourno 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸vor 3 Monaten

Well said.

Profilbild von 𝕷𝖛𝖓𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖈
𝕷𝖛𝖓𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖈vor 3 Monaten

Who is your spouses partner?

Profilbild von Eduardo
Eduardovor 3 Monaten

🤣❤️👌

Profilbild von Fiona B
Fiona Bvor 3 Monaten

Has anyone sent this to @AlboMP ?

Profilbild von History
Historyvor 3 Monaten

Which occupation is ginger referring to? And where in the resolution does it say murder and abduct civilians?