Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This is a useful clarification...

186,912 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

36 Comments

Sol War Veteran's profile picture
Sol War Veteran3 months ago

If it's a random guy saying something on Tik Tok it's gotta be useful. Amiright? 140k people follow this garbage posting clown show.

Kerry Burgess's profile picture
Kerry Burgess3 months ago

Unless you would care to rebut anything in the clip, you can sit your boring, lazy, uninformed ass down, Sol War. And X can carry on ignoring your irrelevant opinions on anything...

Karen, Esq's profile picture
Karen, Esq3 months ago

He lost me at master of holocaust studies. A stooge of lies that send most $ to Israel cannot be spokesperson simultaneously for justice. He is a Zionist through and through.

Dana🌺's profile picture
Dana🌺3 months ago

The world needs to be held accountable, we need to put everything back together for the Palestinians, they’ve lost so much and a lifetime isn’t even enough.

Seraphim of Snark's profile picture
Seraphim of Snark3 months ago

This is a useful graphic of clarification.

Teresa Nacli's profile picture
Teresa Nacli3 months ago

#Israel 🇮🇱 is a terrorist state, stealing and killin since 67 with @Netanyahu war criminal ! ENOUGH 🇮🇱 get out of 🇵🇸🇸🇾🇱🇧 land stealers

innerTension's profile picture
innerTension3 months ago

So let's assume that it's legal for you to bomb a restaurant, or a bus, or to invade a country and kill 800 civilians in a handful of hours. You think that it's fine just because it's legal?

Kerry Burgess's profile picture
Kerry Burgess3 months ago

So lets assume someone bombs a restaurant, or bus, or invades a country and kills some of it's soldiers. Is it fine for the country being attacked to mass murder hundreds of it's own citizens and then mass murder hundreds of thousands of innocent civilains and commit genocide in the country that it is illegally occupying in retaliation?

innerTension's profile picture
innerTension3 months ago

Israel did not kill their own, as I am sure you know, IDF showed up hours after the incident occurred, which means Hamas were already killing for hours, there are many videos online. It is not a genocide because the aim is not to destroy Palestinian people.

Kerry Burgess's profile picture
Kerry Burgess3 months ago

Of course, they killed their own. Why do you think they buried all those cars that were destroyed by Apache gunship fire?

innerTension's profile picture
innerTension3 months ago

Bro I am not watching Chunky Yogurt and Ana Armenian-Employed-by-Turks talk for 8 minutes. How is it possible that IDF did not respond to the attack for hours and at the same time they were the ones who killed civilians when there are videos with Hamas inside of Kibbutzim. Retard

mjc's profile picture
mjc3 months ago

@KerryBurgess there are israeli accounts of israeli forces attacking them in the kibbutzim

innerTension's profile picture
innerTension3 months ago

@KerryBurgess Yes, there is one account about a tank shell blowing up a building.

Karen, Esq's profile picture
Karen, Esq3 months ago

Anyone that perpetuates the hollycaust is by default A ZIONIST. He or she is supporting 1. the false reason for establishment of Israel, just like Christian Zionists. 2. the biggest sympathy-coercion on the West to exact bombs and $ for Israel, just like Christian Zionism. Holocaustianity is Zionism, Just like Christian Zionism.

🍿🦋 PopCultured4 🎮💚's profile picture
🍿🦋 PopCultured4 🎮💚3 months ago

Australia has forgotten why the UN Charter and international laws were created despite a bi-annual commemoration with chants of "Lest We Forget" (ANZAC & Rememberance Day)...

Nathaniel's profile picture
Nathaniel3 months ago

targeting civilians isn’t resistance right? also israel is recognized by international law right? a lot of how you frame this is pretty vague so i just want to clarify.

Niccolo's profile picture
Niccolo3 months ago

He has an undergrad degree from tik tok university and a masters from trust me bro college

Dov Baër דוב בער's profile picture
Dov Baër דוב בער3 months ago

Jews are indigenous to Israel. Arabs arrived as colonizers and went on to steal the entire Middle East and North Africa. Jews were oppressed for centuries, so in 1948 we rebelled. Because oppressed people have the right to resist. Zionism is resistance. Vive la résistance!

Bartleby's profile picture
Bartleby3 months ago

Judas, is that you? Long time no see. You haven't changed a bit.

Scott's profile picture
Scott3 months ago

The world needs clarification like this. Not 'clarification' with intent to deceive & manipulate, like that of our media/politico masters who reign over us like untouchable luxury-yacht-dwelling tyrants. But simple truth clarity said a million times or more

OFF GEEKKIDD's profile picture
OFF GEEKKIDD3 months ago

*A message that, normally, passionately Zionists alone cannot understand.

William B.'s profile picture
William B.3 months ago

Everything he just stated is objectively true and accurate. Oh, and there's this!

David Caldicott's profile picture
David Caldicott3 months ago

This would be most of us right now..

Rdawg's profile picture
Rdawg3 months ago

lol…Israel has no legal right to self defense….sure Jan. Proving the UN is worthless.

Maryam's profile picture
Maryam3 months ago

👏

Mary's profile picture
Mary3 months ago

Note who did not ratify 1977 Protocols.

WorldFirst🕊️🌎❤️'s profile picture
WorldFirst🕊️🌎❤️3 months ago

@OlivesStones Critical to know.

I Am's profile picture
I Am3 months ago

So Isreal doesn’t have the right to exist…. Thank you you’ve made my point

al's profile picture
al3 months ago

Exposed these genocidal maniacs brother ✊🏼🇵🇸

Rishad Khan 🇨🇦🇦🇺's profile picture
Rishad Khan 🇨🇦🇦🇺3 months ago

@tammym2005 Well said👏👏👏

Steven Hoffman's profile picture
Steven Hoffman3 months ago

’ video is misleading and biased. It correctly cites Additional Protocol I (1977) and certain UNGA resolutions recognizing armed struggles for self-determination, but draws incorrect conclusions from them. Protocol I and the Geneva Conventions require all parties to follow the same rules: civilians cannot be targeted, attacks must distinguish military from civilian targets, and war crimes (deliberate civilian massacres, hostage-taking, etc.) are prohibited—no “resistance exception” exists. Presenting “genocide” as undisputed fact (the ICJ case has no final merits ruling) and claiming critics have “no right” to question tactics is not law—it’s selective advocacy. Consistent IHL demands symmetric scrutiny of all violations, not one-sided immunity.

realexpatjourno 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸's profile picture
realexpatjourno 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸3 months ago

Well said.

𝕷𝖛𝖓𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖈's profile picture
𝕷𝖛𝖓𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖈3 months ago

Who is your spouses partner?

Eduardo's profile picture
Eduardo3 months ago

🤣❤️👌

Fiona B's profile picture
Fiona B3 months ago

Has anyone sent this to @AlboMP ?

History's profile picture
History3 months ago

Which occupation is ginger referring to? And where in the resolution does it say murder and abduct civilians?