正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

This is a useful clarification...

186,912 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

36 条评论

Sol War Veteran 的头像
Sol War Veteran3 个月前

If it's a random guy saying something on Tik Tok it's gotta be useful. Amiright? 140k people follow this garbage posting clown show.

Kerry Burgess 的头像
Kerry Burgess3 个月前

Unless you would care to rebut anything in the clip, you can sit your boring, lazy, uninformed ass down, Sol War. And X can carry on ignoring your irrelevant opinions on anything...

Karen, Esq 的头像
Karen, Esq3 个月前

He lost me at master of holocaust studies. A stooge of lies that send most $ to Israel cannot be spokesperson simultaneously for justice. He is a Zionist through and through.

Dana🌺 的头像
Dana🌺3 个月前

The world needs to be held accountable, we need to put everything back together for the Palestinians, they’ve lost so much and a lifetime isn’t even enough.

Seraphim of Snark 的头像
Seraphim of Snark3 个月前

This is a useful graphic of clarification.

Teresa Nacli 的头像
Teresa Nacli3 个月前

#Israel 🇮🇱 is a terrorist state, stealing and killin since 67 with @Netanyahu war criminal ! ENOUGH 🇮🇱 get out of 🇵🇸🇸🇾🇱🇧 land stealers

innerTension 的头像
innerTension3 个月前

So let's assume that it's legal for you to bomb a restaurant, or a bus, or to invade a country and kill 800 civilians in a handful of hours. You think that it's fine just because it's legal?

Kerry Burgess 的头像
Kerry Burgess3 个月前

So lets assume someone bombs a restaurant, or bus, or invades a country and kills some of it's soldiers. Is it fine for the country being attacked to mass murder hundreds of it's own citizens and then mass murder hundreds of thousands of innocent civilains and commit genocide in the country that it is illegally occupying in retaliation?

innerTension 的头像
innerTension3 个月前

Israel did not kill their own, as I am sure you know, IDF showed up hours after the incident occurred, which means Hamas were already killing for hours, there are many videos online. It is not a genocide because the aim is not to destroy Palestinian people.

Kerry Burgess 的头像
Kerry Burgess3 个月前

Of course, they killed their own. Why do you think they buried all those cars that were destroyed by Apache gunship fire?

innerTension 的头像
innerTension3 个月前

Bro I am not watching Chunky Yogurt and Ana Armenian-Employed-by-Turks talk for 8 minutes. How is it possible that IDF did not respond to the attack for hours and at the same time they were the ones who killed civilians when there are videos with Hamas inside of Kibbutzim. Retard

mjc 的头像
mjc3 个月前

@KerryBurgess there are israeli accounts of israeli forces attacking them in the kibbutzim

innerTension 的头像
innerTension3 个月前

@KerryBurgess Yes, there is one account about a tank shell blowing up a building.

Karen, Esq 的头像
Karen, Esq3 个月前

Anyone that perpetuates the hollycaust is by default A ZIONIST. He or she is supporting 1. the false reason for establishment of Israel, just like Christian Zionists. 2. the biggest sympathy-coercion on the West to exact bombs and $ for Israel, just like Christian Zionism. Holocaustianity is Zionism, Just like Christian Zionism.

🍿🦋 PopCultured4 🎮💚 的头像
🍿🦋 PopCultured4 🎮💚3 个月前

Australia has forgotten why the UN Charter and international laws were created despite a bi-annual commemoration with chants of "Lest We Forget" (ANZAC & Rememberance Day)...

Nathaniel 的头像
Nathaniel3 个月前

targeting civilians isn’t resistance right? also israel is recognized by international law right? a lot of how you frame this is pretty vague so i just want to clarify.

Niccolo 的头像
Niccolo3 个月前

He has an undergrad degree from tik tok university and a masters from trust me bro college

Dov Baër דוב בער 的头像
Dov Baër דוב בער3 个月前

Jews are indigenous to Israel. Arabs arrived as colonizers and went on to steal the entire Middle East and North Africa. Jews were oppressed for centuries, so in 1948 we rebelled. Because oppressed people have the right to resist. Zionism is resistance. Vive la résistance!

Bartleby 的头像
Bartleby3 个月前

Judas, is that you? Long time no see. You haven't changed a bit.

Scott 的头像
Scott3 个月前

The world needs clarification like this. Not 'clarification' with intent to deceive & manipulate, like that of our media/politico masters who reign over us like untouchable luxury-yacht-dwelling tyrants. But simple truth clarity said a million times or more

OFF GEEKKIDD 的头像
OFF GEEKKIDD3 个月前

*A message that, normally, passionately Zionists alone cannot understand.

William B. 的头像
William B.3 个月前

Everything he just stated is objectively true and accurate. Oh, and there's this!

David Caldicott 的头像
David Caldicott3 个月前

This would be most of us right now..

Rdawg 的头像
Rdawg3 个月前

lol…Israel has no legal right to self defense….sure Jan. Proving the UN is worthless.

Maryam 的头像
Maryam3 个月前

👏

Mary 的头像
Mary3 个月前

Note who did not ratify 1977 Protocols.

WorldFirst🕊️🌎❤️ 的头像
WorldFirst🕊️🌎❤️3 个月前

@OlivesStones Critical to know.

I Am 的头像
I Am3 个月前

So Isreal doesn’t have the right to exist…. Thank you you’ve made my point

al 的头像
al3 个月前

Exposed these genocidal maniacs brother ✊🏼🇵🇸

Rishad Khan 🇨🇦🇦🇺 的头像
Rishad Khan 🇨🇦🇦🇺3 个月前

@tammym2005 Well said👏👏👏

Steven Hoffman 的头像
Steven Hoffman3 个月前

’ video is misleading and biased. It correctly cites Additional Protocol I (1977) and certain UNGA resolutions recognizing armed struggles for self-determination, but draws incorrect conclusions from them. Protocol I and the Geneva Conventions require all parties to follow the same rules: civilians cannot be targeted, attacks must distinguish military from civilian targets, and war crimes (deliberate civilian massacres, hostage-taking, etc.) are prohibited—no “resistance exception” exists. Presenting “genocide” as undisputed fact (the ICJ case has no final merits ruling) and claiming critics have “no right” to question tactics is not law—it’s selective advocacy. Consistent IHL demands symmetric scrutiny of all violations, not one-sided immunity.

realexpatjourno 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸 的头像
realexpatjourno 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸3 个月前

Well said.

𝕷𝖛𝖓𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖈 的头像
𝕷𝖛𝖓𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖈3 个月前

Who is your spouses partner?

Eduardo 的头像
Eduardo3 个月前

🤣❤️👌

Fiona B 的头像
Fiona B3 个月前

Has anyone sent this to @AlboMP ?

History 的头像
History3 个月前

Which occupation is ginger referring to? And where in the resolution does it say murder and abduct civilians?