Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This is a video that's been circulating. It's NOT from a Chinese bot farm as claimed but rather a digital social media marketing company called MINSoftware, based in Vietnam. Accuracy is important. But this set up is still used to "market" content & there's no shortage of bot farms... show more

Katherine Brodsky

128,018 subscribers

10,693 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Scaling social media content is a grind, but Fetra AI makes it look easy. I've been testing this powerful AI marketing engine that turns trending video formats into viral branded videos in seconds. Here is exactly how I'm using it to scale.

Scaling social media content is a grind, but Fetra AI makes it look easy. I've been testing this powerful AI marketing engine that turns trending video formats into viral branded videos in seconds. Here is exactly how I'm using it to scale.

KATE

128,940 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Your post is a flawed generalisation and a form of social media gaslighting that South Africans are now used to. South Africa is not perfect, but it is a great nation with people who love it and are dedicated to make it stand out among the nations. Perhaps you are accustomed to dealing with "slaves with Stockholm syndrome," but this is not South Africa's reality. There is no country like South Africa; criticise all you want, but we remain the envy of many nations. We love South Africa.🇿🇦❤️

Your post is a flawed generalisation and a form of social media gaslighting that South Africans are now used to. South Africa is not perfect, but it is a great nation with people who love it and are dedicated to make it stand out among the nations. Perhaps you are accustomed to dealing with "slaves with Stockholm syndrome," but this is not South Africa's reality. There is no country like South Africa; criticise all you want, but we remain the envy of many nations. We love South Africa.🇿🇦❤️

Monwabisi Kete 🇿🇦

22,169 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This video is from a small account but went so viral it instantly shot up to over 100k Likes and it’s only 11 seconds So what is it? It’s a message to Elon Musk “This message is to Elon Musk from every proud American in this country. Thank you, brother. Thank you” LOVE THIS 🇺🇸 Americans are CLEARLY so proud and thankful of the work Elon Musk and DOGE are doing!

This video is from a small account but went so viral it instantly shot up to over 100k Likes and it’s only 11 seconds So what is it? It’s a message to Elon Musk “This message is to Elon Musk from every proud American in this country. Thank you, brother. Thank you” LOVE THIS 🇺🇸 Americans are CLEARLY so proud and thankful of the work Elon Musk and DOGE are doing!

Wall Street Apes

570,331 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Some folks are saying Deep Seek censors certain topics (like Tiannamen Square) because it's a Chinese app. This is not true. Deep Seek is an open source LLM. You can download it, or host it outside China, and use it however you want. If you use its chat interface that's based in China, it will have to comply with the Chinese regulations. But outside China, you can do pretty much anything. For our app Research Kick, we are hosting it in the US. You can see, it answers my question about Tiannamen Square.

Some folks are saying Deep Seek censors certain topics (like Tiannamen Square) because it's a Chinese app. This is not true. Deep Seek is an open source LLM. You can download it, or host it outside China, and use it however you want. If you use its chat interface that's based in China, it will have to comply with the Chinese regulations. But outside China, you can do pretty much anything. For our app Research Kick, we are hosting it in the US. You can see, it answers my question about Tiannamen Square.

Mushtaq Bilal, PhD

27,441 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

people can say what they want but THIS is what it takes to be a champion. there will be good days and there will be bad days but it's about how you handle it. he never gave up, he never backed down and that's why he's number 1. SURVIVE AND ADVANCE ❤️‍🔥

people can say what they want but THIS is what it takes to be a champion. there will be good days and there will be bad days but it's about how you handle it. he never gave up, he never backed down and that's why he's number 1. SURVIVE AND ADVANCE ❤️‍🔥

goddess

27,386 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Today a group of Muslims prayed next to the Ministry of Defence, facing the Iraq and Afghanistan memorial. As I have said before, choosing to pray in this way in public is a political act. It is a social statement and, yes, it is an act of domination. Anybody who understands Islamism understands that the domination of public spaces is part of the modus operandi. It is done so Islamists can show who is in charge - and to show other Muslims and the wider public that the authorities will bend to their will. There is quite obviously no need to pray here. The decision to do so is symbolic and pointed. It is not welcome. We have freedom of religion in this country, which is why there are mosques. But we are not a Muslim country and this is not welcome. It should be stopped.

Today a group of Muslims prayed next to the Ministry of Defence, facing the Iraq and Afghanistan memorial. As I have said before, choosing to pray in this way in public is a political act. It is a social statement and, yes, it is an act of domination. Anybody who understands Islamism understands that the domination of public spaces is part of the modus operandi. It is done so Islamists can show who is in charge - and to show other Muslims and the wider public that the authorities will bend to their will. There is quite obviously no need to pray here. The decision to do so is symbolic and pointed. It is not welcome. We have freedom of religion in this country, which is why there are mosques. But we are not a Muslim country and this is not welcome. It should be stopped.

Nick Timothy MP

1,478,279 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

"Houthis are targeting Mecca"🚀 A serious claim that is often repeated, but where is the visual proof? Up until this moment, we have not seen a single video confirming this accusation.!! I ask anyone—whether Saudi or non-Saudi—who has a document or video proving this targeting to share it with us; Only then will I be the first to dedicate my effort and time to discuss this violation and stand in solidarity with the Saudi narrative as soon as it is proven.

"Houthis are targeting Mecca"🚀 A serious claim that is often repeated, but where is the visual proof? Up until this moment, we have not seen a single video confirming this accusation.!! I ask anyone—whether Saudi or non-Saudi—who has a document or video proving this targeting to share it with us; Only then will I be the first to dedicate my effort and time to discuss this violation and stand in solidarity with the Saudi narrative as soon as it is proven.

Russia X 🇷🇺

59,319 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

don't understand why this chanel x charvet shirt is getting so much attention. it's a ready-to-wear shirt from a bespoke tailoring house that retails for $4,350. that's ~5x the price of Charvet's bespoke but with none of the benefits. worse still, it has a chain at the bottom no one will see but will make it a pain in the ass to launder.

don't understand why this chanel x charvet shirt is getting so much attention. it's a ready-to-wear shirt from a bespoke tailoring house that retails for $4,350. that's ~5x the price of Charvet's bespoke but with none of the benefits. worse still, it has a chain at the bottom no one will see but will make it a pain in the ass to launder.

derek guy

808,841 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

A Hamas Tower Comes Down You don’t have to like the images of destruction. But what you can’t call this is “indiscriminate.” This tower was being used by Hamas as a military base. The IDF informed everyone in advance, ordered an evacuation, and even the media crews were set up outside and ready to film when it happened.

A Hamas Tower Comes Down You don’t have to like the images of destruction. But what you can’t call this is “indiscriminate.” This tower was being used by Hamas as a military base. The IDF informed everyone in advance, ordered an evacuation, and even the media crews were set up outside and ready to film when it happened.

Mossad Commentary

329,582 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

‼️An interesting interview with Lavrov Sergey Lavrov regularly gives interviews, and almost every one of them is an information operation designed to create an alternative reality. The March 26 interview with France Télévisions is no exception. Let's break it down and point out where there are lies and where there is manipulation. 1. Lavrov claims that Russia is supposedly defending international law while speaking in the "language of principles" regarding Iran. What's wrong: it's basic role reversal. Moscow is trying to speak from the position of a "guardian of the law," even though it is waging an aggressive war against Ukraine. In the case of Iran, Lavrov is also deliberately omitting half the picture: yes, the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, but Iran also faced non-proliferation concerns raised by the IAEA. Why it matters: It is an attempt to whitewash Russia's crimes through someone else's crisis and to present the aggressor (Russia) as the judge. 2. Russia does not provide Iran with intelligence; the coordinates of US bases are "already known to everyone." What's wrong: it's an evasive statement, not a complete refutation. There is no independently verified evidence of specific target marking data transfers in open sources, nor can there be, but the Kremlin's "we have nothing to do with it" claim has no basis for being automatically considered true. Why it matters: A typical Kremlin tactic - to deny anything that does not align with Russia's interests and to continue operating in a gray area. 3. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have denied the US access to their airspace, so Russia is right about the "American venture." What's wrong: The caution of Gulf countries is real, but Lavrov turns it into a crude anti-Western caricature. Regional politics are more complex than the Kremlin's narrative that "everyone understands everything, only the US is pushing the world into chaos." Why it matters: The Kremlin takes a partial truth and builds a convenient political myth around it. 4. Russia isn't waging wars for its own gain; it's the US that wants to control the energy sector, the Strait of Hormuz, and the markets. What's wrong: It's pure projection. It is Russia that has used energy as a weapon for years, and after 2022, turned petrodollars into fuel for war. Why it matters: Moscow accuses others of doing what it does systematically - this is one of the central techniques of its propaganda. 5. Since 2014, Ukraine has been ruled by a "Nazi regime" that came to power through a coup. What's wrong: After Yanukovych fled, Ukraine held snap presidential elections, which the OSCE recognized as meeting international standards and being competitive. The claim of a "Nazi regime" is a political label, not a description of reality. Why it matters: "Nazism" in Kremlin rhetoric is a tool for dehumanizing Ukraine and justifying the war. 6. The Russian language is allegedly completely banned in Ukraine. What's wrong: Ukraine has strengthened the role of the state language, but this does not mean a total ban on Russian. The law does not apply to private communication and does not criminalize the everyday use of the language. Why it matters: The Kremlin is exaggerating language policy to the level of a "linguistic apocalypse" to sell the war as a supposed humanitarian mission. 7. Ukraine is allegedly at war with Orthodoxy and has "banned the canonical church." What's wrong: This is not about "banning a faith," but about a law regarding religious organizations linked to the Russian Orthodox Church. Even criticism from human rights activists does not support the Kremlin's claim of "persecution of Orthodoxy." Why it matters: Moscow is using the language of religious protection to cover up its network of influence in Ukraine. 8. The West allegedly cynically exploited the Minsk agreements as a respite to arm Ukraine. What's wrong: The Minsk process was collapsing because of the Kremlin's desire to use the agreements to establish de facto control over Ukraine, not because of some "cunning plot" by Paris and Berlin. Why it matters: The Kremlin is rewriting history retroactively to portray its own aggression as a supposedly forced response to "universal betrayal." 9. Russia does not attack civilians; its targets are solely facilities associated with the AFU. What's wrong: It's an outright lie. For years, the UN and independent sources have documented systematic Russian strikes on cities, residential areas, energy facilities, and civilian infrastructure. Why it matters: This is no longer just propaganda, but a cynical denial of documented terror against civilians. 10. The Bucha massacre is allegedly "not proven": there are no names, no evidence, and journalists haven't shown anything. What's wrong: This is one of the most mendacious claims. There are UN documents, testimonies, criminal investigations, identified suspects, and evidence of executions and killings of civilians. Why it matters: The Kremlin is not trying to refute the crime, but to wear down the audience with doubt and turn mass murder into "one of the versions." 11. Russia wants peace and negotiations. What's wrong: In the Kremlin's vocabulary, "peace" does not mean an end to aggression, but rather acceptance of its results. "Realities on the ground" means occupation; "root causes" means demanding recognition of Russia's right to punish neighbors for their political choices. Why it matters: Lavrov isn't offering peace. He's dressing up surrender in softer language. 12. Europe is supposedly dragging out the war, while Russia is looking for a solution. What's wrong: Russia started this war itself. European aid to Ukraine is a response to the aggression, not its cause. Why it matters: This is the main inversion of Kremlin logic - to make the audience forget who attacked first and shift the discussion from aggression to a "conflict that has dragged on too long." 13. RT and Sputnik are victims of censorship, and France has no right to speak about freedom of speech. What's wrong: RT and Sputnik were banned not as "ordinary media," but as state-run tools of disinformation. Their role as propaganda channels has been publicly acknowledged both in the EU and in France. Why it matters: The Kremlin wants to portray the defense of democracies against malicious information operations as a restriction of free speech. 14. France and Europe have made Russia an enemy; Moscow is merely reacting. What's wrong: The cause of the rift is not "Russophobia," but Russia's invasion, war crimes, blackmail, and influence operations against Europe. Why it matters: The Kremlin is systematically trying to reverse the cause-and-effect relationship: it is not that "Russia destroyed relations," but that "the West rejected Russia." 15. Individual real episodes - the tanker, incidents in France, disputes among allies - allegedly prove Western hypocrisy and justify Russia. What's wrong: Lavrov takes a real but local fact and uses it as a smokescreen. None of these incidents erases Russia's crimes or the very fact of its aggression. Why it matters: This is a favorite Kremlin method - using others' difficulties and whataboutism to cover up its own crimes.

‼️An interesting interview with Lavrov Sergey Lavrov regularly gives interviews, and almost every one of them is an information operation designed to create an alternative reality. The March 26 interview with France Télévisions is no exception. Let's break it down and point out where there are lies and where there is manipulation. 1. Lavrov claims that Russia is supposedly defending international law while speaking in the "language of principles" regarding Iran. What's wrong: it's basic role reversal. Moscow is trying to speak from the position of a "guardian of the law," even though it is waging an aggressive war against Ukraine. In the case of Iran, Lavrov is also deliberately omitting half the picture: yes, the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, but Iran also faced non-proliferation concerns raised by the IAEA. Why it matters: It is an attempt to whitewash Russia's crimes through someone else's crisis and to present the aggressor (Russia) as the judge. 2. Russia does not provide Iran with intelligence; the coordinates of US bases are "already known to everyone." What's wrong: it's an evasive statement, not a complete refutation. There is no independently verified evidence of specific target marking data transfers in open sources, nor can there be, but the Kremlin's "we have nothing to do with it" claim has no basis for being automatically considered true. Why it matters: A typical Kremlin tactic - to deny anything that does not align with Russia's interests and to continue operating in a gray area. 3. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have denied the US access to their airspace, so Russia is right about the "American venture." What's wrong: The caution of Gulf countries is real, but Lavrov turns it into a crude anti-Western caricature. Regional politics are more complex than the Kremlin's narrative that "everyone understands everything, only the US is pushing the world into chaos." Why it matters: The Kremlin takes a partial truth and builds a convenient political myth around it. 4. Russia isn't waging wars for its own gain; it's the US that wants to control the energy sector, the Strait of Hormuz, and the markets. What's wrong: It's pure projection. It is Russia that has used energy as a weapon for years, and after 2022, turned petrodollars into fuel for war. Why it matters: Moscow accuses others of doing what it does systematically - this is one of the central techniques of its propaganda. 5. Since 2014, Ukraine has been ruled by a "Nazi regime" that came to power through a coup. What's wrong: After Yanukovych fled, Ukraine held snap presidential elections, which the OSCE recognized as meeting international standards and being competitive. The claim of a "Nazi regime" is a political label, not a description of reality. Why it matters: "Nazism" in Kremlin rhetoric is a tool for dehumanizing Ukraine and justifying the war. 6. The Russian language is allegedly completely banned in Ukraine. What's wrong: Ukraine has strengthened the role of the state language, but this does not mean a total ban on Russian. The law does not apply to private communication and does not criminalize the everyday use of the language. Why it matters: The Kremlin is exaggerating language policy to the level of a "linguistic apocalypse" to sell the war as a supposed humanitarian mission. 7. Ukraine is allegedly at war with Orthodoxy and has "banned the canonical church." What's wrong: This is not about "banning a faith," but about a law regarding religious organizations linked to the Russian Orthodox Church. Even criticism from human rights activists does not support the Kremlin's claim of "persecution of Orthodoxy." Why it matters: Moscow is using the language of religious protection to cover up its network of influence in Ukraine. 8. The West allegedly cynically exploited the Minsk agreements as a respite to arm Ukraine. What's wrong: The Minsk process was collapsing because of the Kremlin's desire to use the agreements to establish de facto control over Ukraine, not because of some "cunning plot" by Paris and Berlin. Why it matters: The Kremlin is rewriting history retroactively to portray its own aggression as a supposedly forced response to "universal betrayal." 9. Russia does not attack civilians; its targets are solely facilities associated with the AFU. What's wrong: It's an outright lie. For years, the UN and independent sources have documented systematic Russian strikes on cities, residential areas, energy facilities, and civilian infrastructure. Why it matters: This is no longer just propaganda, but a cynical denial of documented terror against civilians. 10. The Bucha massacre is allegedly "not proven": there are no names, no evidence, and journalists haven't shown anything. What's wrong: This is one of the most mendacious claims. There are UN documents, testimonies, criminal investigations, identified suspects, and evidence of executions and killings of civilians. Why it matters: The Kremlin is not trying to refute the crime, but to wear down the audience with doubt and turn mass murder into "one of the versions." 11. Russia wants peace and negotiations. What's wrong: In the Kremlin's vocabulary, "peace" does not mean an end to aggression, but rather acceptance of its results. "Realities on the ground" means occupation; "root causes" means demanding recognition of Russia's right to punish neighbors for their political choices. Why it matters: Lavrov isn't offering peace. He's dressing up surrender in softer language. 12. Europe is supposedly dragging out the war, while Russia is looking for a solution. What's wrong: Russia started this war itself. European aid to Ukraine is a response to the aggression, not its cause. Why it matters: This is the main inversion of Kremlin logic - to make the audience forget who attacked first and shift the discussion from aggression to a "conflict that has dragged on too long." 13. RT and Sputnik are victims of censorship, and France has no right to speak about freedom of speech. What's wrong: RT and Sputnik were banned not as "ordinary media," but as state-run tools of disinformation. Their role as propaganda channels has been publicly acknowledged both in the EU and in France. Why it matters: The Kremlin wants to portray the defense of democracies against malicious information operations as a restriction of free speech. 14. France and Europe have made Russia an enemy; Moscow is merely reacting. What's wrong: The cause of the rift is not "Russophobia," but Russia's invasion, war crimes, blackmail, and influence operations against Europe. Why it matters: The Kremlin is systematically trying to reverse the cause-and-effect relationship: it is not that "Russia destroyed relations," but that "the West rejected Russia." 15. Individual real episodes - the tanker, incidents in France, disputes among allies - allegedly prove Western hypocrisy and justify Russia. What's wrong: Lavrov takes a real but local fact and uses it as a smokescreen. None of these incidents erases Russia's crimes or the very fact of its aggression. Why it matters: This is a favorite Kremlin method - using others' difficulties and whataboutism to cover up its own crimes.

Anton Gerashchenko

88,596 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

I've used ghee a fair bit in my animal-based life but I was never able to tolerate the taste of it straight from the jar. This Great Ghee product is different. It tastes more like butter than any ghee I have ever used plus it's lab tested for glyphosate, grass fed and made from A2 cows. Ghee is clarified butter with the water and milk solids removed, leaving it almost pure fat. It is a low omega 6 concentration of saturated and monounsaturated fats and has little lactose and casein, which is why many people tolerate it better than butter and it's why it has a very high smoke point. Highly recommend this ghee and it's made by a small business in Virginia.

I've used ghee a fair bit in my animal-based life but I was never able to tolerate the taste of it straight from the jar. This Great Ghee product is different. It tastes more like butter than any ghee I have ever used plus it's lab tested for glyphosate, grass fed and made from A2 cows. Ghee is clarified butter with the water and milk solids removed, leaving it almost pure fat. It is a low omega 6 concentration of saturated and monounsaturated fats and has little lactose and casein, which is why many people tolerate it better than butter and it's why it has a very high smoke point. Highly recommend this ghee and it's made by a small business in Virginia.

Cary Kelly

25,775 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This Instagram account is probably absolutely printing right now It got 14 million views on its first reel and got 45k followers in 3 weeks of making the account Using this completely AI video format just using Omegle reactions from other videos and putting an AI avatar in it I’ve seen the same format promoting looksmaxxing This account is promoting AI only fans but that’s a shitty way to make money but the creativity used in this is how you should be approaching your AI video content to promote whatever it is your promoting

Pounds

363,958 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Imagine the amount of propaganda it took to convince women that waking up like this is oppressive but waking up hangover and alone, or even worse, with a stranger, isn’t.

Imagine the amount of propaganda it took to convince women that waking up like this is oppressive but waking up hangover and alone, or even worse, with a stranger, isn’t.

Ada Lluch

5,910,013 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

I would rather not continue this conversation, but I felt this needed to be highlighted. Why are we Supporting sniping in videos/on stream, Especially as a big streamer? Stream sniping is already happening a lot, and talking about how fun it is on stream just makes it worse.

I would rather not continue this conversation, but I felt this needed to be highlighted. Why are we Supporting sniping in videos/on stream, Especially as a big streamer? Stream sniping is already happening a lot, and talking about how fun it is on stream just makes it worse.

Coma

43,553 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

AI will kill Polymarket. $2.2M in 2 months using probability models. This news is going to blow up the internet. Polymarket trader made $2.2M in just 2 months using AI. His account is traded entirely by a bot. I’ve heard plenty of stories about AI trading bots before, and almost all of them turned out to be scams or didn’t work properly. But this case is different and honestly I’m shocked. He uses AI probability models, training machine learning to estimate real odds based on news and social media data. If his model says an outcome has a 60% chance, while the market prices it at 50% (50¢), he buys because the market is mispricing it. According to his profile: > His prediction accuracy is 74%. That’s insane. He runs an ensemble of 10 AI models that retrain themselves every week to stay up to date. What do you think about this? This feels like the new reality.

igorizuchaetcrypty

511,969 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

1) This is from Vietnam. 2) It's not a structural element, it's a polystyrene facade element, used insulation with added fire retardant. This is Japanese displaying the Galapagos syndrome in full. They take pride in ignorance and information isolation, especially when it comes to China.

1) This is from Vietnam. 2) It's not a structural element, it's a polystyrene facade element, used insulation with added fire retardant. This is Japanese displaying the Galapagos syndrome in full. They take pride in ignorance and information isolation, especially when it comes to China.

Zhao DaShuai 东北进修🇨🇳

55,790 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce