正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

“This is about the most intimate decisions that we make as humans. This shouldn't be the purview of a right wing SCOTUS. This right, that was fought for a half a century ago, should remain with a woman, her family, her faith and her doctor.”—Cory Booker on reproductive rights

15,180 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Covfefe Israela 的头像
Covfefe Israela3 年前

@CoryBooker SCOTUS simply clarified abortion is a State matter not a Supreme Court issue.

Krakincodes 的头像
Krakincodes3 年前

@CoryBooker Gee running on infanticide is wonderful. 20 million black children have been decapitated and dismembered by abortion in the U.S. alone- ten times the white average- that’s the true genocide, which you are silent on since you approve of it!

bbnanny 的头像
bbnanny3 年前

@CoryBooker All countries have a 15 week liming on abortion except US. Yet you advocate for murdering babies up to and past birth! That is genocide. Our Lord is crying.

Leonard Gilbert 的头像
Leonard Gilbert3 年前

@CoryBooker Roe v Wade was overturned more than 50 years ago. Abortion proponents in Congress had 50 yrs to create the law (SCOTUS doesn't legislate)..they didn't..leaving the decision open for review..it was and reversed. NOW, it's with the States, where it have always been.

Gary Campbell 的头像
Gary Campbell3 年前

@CoryBooker What is a woman?

US Patriot 的头像
US Patriot3 年前

@CoryBooker Only 1% -3% of all abortions are medically necessary, the rest is for convenience...

RG 的头像
RG3 年前

@CoryBooker It's life.

bobobobo 的头像
bobobobo3 年前

@CoryBooker How about possessing basic understanding of Sex and the potential repercussions 🤡😳🤡

iu70us 的头像
iu70us3 年前

@CoryBooker Is the DNC position no time limitations on abortion whatsoever? We deserve an answer.

EBWalsh 的头像
EBWalsh3 年前

@CoryBooker You lefties sure love killing babies- well its said that at least they won't grow up to vote democrat.

相关视频

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 次观看 • 1 年前