Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This is absolutely mind-blowing. A simple routine of getting sunshine, eating fish, and moderate exercise can slash your cancer risk by 60%. If this were a pharmaceutical drug, it would dominate headlines and make hundreds of billions of dollars. But because it doesn’t pad Big Pharma’s pockets, mainstream outlets... show more

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,971,622 subscribers

189,252 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 year ago

Watch the Full Video: The Vitamin D Miracle Supplement

The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 year ago

Top Doctor Reveals Forbidden Cancer Prevention Secrets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 year ago

De-Spike Your Body: Powerful and Affordable Solutions for COVID Vax Injury

Musk Derangement Syndrome_MDS1 year ago

Most people who are into fitness could probably have told you that. @hubermanlab Sh*t, exercise alone does a wonder for physical and mental health. People just aren't educated on diet and exercise - they are always prescribed pills for their problems.

The Redeemed1 year ago

But those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength; they will soar on wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint. — Isaiah 40:31 . Hope is the weapon of the righteous, the fire that does not die. When the world strips you bare, when the weight of suffering crushes your chest, when darkness whispers that all is lost—hope remains. Not in kings, nor in fortunes, nor in the strength of men, but in the Lord Almighty, who does not forsake His own. . A man without hope is already defeated. But a man who holds fast to it, even with trembling hands, is unbreakable. For he does not stand alone. He stands with God, and with God, victory is certain. . So when the storm rages, when all else is taken from you, wield hope like a sword. Fight on. Rise again. For He who promised is faithful, and His light will never fail you. #ChristIsKing #WeAreTheStorm

Mesothelioma Claims Center1 year ago

An estimated $30 Billion has been set aside in asbestos trust funds for victims of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related cancers. Submit the simple form below or call 866-269-3435 to file a claim now.

Jacob1 year ago

Sun, fish, and moving your body: the recipe Big Pharma doesn’t want you to know. 60% less risk, and free! This deserves a megaphone, not a whisper.

Freedom Based1 year ago

Imagine curing disease with fish and fresh air—no wonder they’re suppressing it….

Chaotic Genius1 year ago

Big Pharma isn’t just paying for advertisements on legacy media, it’s buying their loyalty. When your biggest advertiser is also the industry you’re supposed to scrutinize, don’t expect the truth to make the headlines.

The Austin Conservative 🇺🇸🤘1 year ago

You wonder why they push alcohol, video games, unhealthy food, etc. so hard… we are easy to control overweight and addicted to their pharma drugs, social media, streaming, etc.

Sharon Randolph1 year ago

Duh

Related Videos

28/ Dr. Robert Malone (Robert W Malone, MD) was banned from Twitter for sharing this 40-minute video presentation created by the Canadian Citizens Care Alliance, a coalition of over 500 independent doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners. Can we discuss it now❓

28/ Dr. Robert Malone (Robert W Malone, MD) was banned from Twitter for sharing this 40-minute video presentation created by the Canadian Citizens Care Alliance, a coalition of over 500 independent doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners. Can we discuss it now❓

KanekoaTheGreat

173,212 views • 3 years ago

One of the most followed cancer researchers in the world, Dr. William Makis, is honored and proud to be part of a large research study spearheaded by yours truly. A study of this scale, involving over 4,000 patients, requires strong support. We are counting on your help so we can gather and publish the data in a peer-reviewed journal and bring this important research to the world.

One of the most followed cancer researchers in the world, Dr. William Makis, is honored and proud to be part of a large research study spearheaded by yours truly. A study of this scale, involving over 4,000 patients, requires strong support. We are counting on your help so we can gather and publish the data in a peer-reviewed journal and bring this important research to the world.

Marivic Villa, MD, FCCP

17,436 views • 8 months ago

This is one of the biggest stories the TV isn't telling you. You can reduce your risk of cancer, the #2 killer in the world, by 60%, according to findings from a recent study. How? Three simple interventions: #1 - Supplement with Vitamin D #2 - Supplement with omega-3 fatty acids #3 - Implement a simple home exercise program into your life A 60 percent reduction in cancer risk is absolutely astounding. So, why is this information not making headlines? Because the healthier you are, the less money there is to be made.

This is one of the biggest stories the TV isn't telling you. You can reduce your risk of cancer, the #2 killer in the world, by 60%, according to findings from a recent study. How? Three simple interventions: #1 - Supplement with Vitamin D #2 - Supplement with omega-3 fatty acids #3 - Implement a simple home exercise program into your life A 60 percent reduction in cancer risk is absolutely astounding. So, why is this information not making headlines? Because the healthier you are, the less money there is to be made.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,433,096 views • 2 years ago

We know the medical establishment lied to us about COVID. And according to esteemed physician Dr. Paul Marik, they are also lying to you about the sun. Here's a few things about Vitamin D that Big Pharma doesn't want you to know: #1 - "If you’re vitamin D deficient, it increases your risk of getting cancer.” “There’s a linear relationship between vitamin D deficiency and cancer. And the further you go away from the equator, the less UVB you get, the greater your risk of cancer. This has been well established!” drpaulmarik stressed. #2 - "Vitamin D is highly effective for the treatment of depression.” It’s also “very important for the immune system,” Dr. Marik added. “People don’t like vitamin D. They just don’t like it because if people took vitamin D, [they] would reduce the risk of cancer — would reduce the risk of many diseases." #3 - “If you avoid the sun, it increases your risk of dying [prematurely] by about 25%.” Dr. Marik recommended going into the sun for about 30 minutes a day. He advised not to use sunscreens because “it defeats the purpose.” “In fact, there’s some data that sunscreens increase your risk of melanoma — paradoxically.” The full article featuring Dr. Paul Marik is available to read in the comment below:

We know the medical establishment lied to us about COVID. And according to esteemed physician Dr. Paul Marik, they are also lying to you about the sun. Here's a few things about Vitamin D that Big Pharma doesn't want you to know: #1 - "If you’re vitamin D deficient, it increases your risk of getting cancer.” “There’s a linear relationship between vitamin D deficiency and cancer. And the further you go away from the equator, the less UVB you get, the greater your risk of cancer. This has been well established!” drpaulmarik stressed. #2 - "Vitamin D is highly effective for the treatment of depression.” It’s also “very important for the immune system,” Dr. Marik added. “People don’t like vitamin D. They just don’t like it because if people took vitamin D, [they] would reduce the risk of cancer — would reduce the risk of many diseases." #3 - “If you avoid the sun, it increases your risk of dying [prematurely] by about 25%.” Dr. Marik recommended going into the sun for about 30 minutes a day. He advised not to use sunscreens because “it defeats the purpose.” “In fact, there’s some data that sunscreens increase your risk of melanoma — paradoxically.” The full article featuring Dr. Paul Marik is available to read in the comment below:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,360,633 views • 2 years ago

Dr. Paul Marik, one of the most cited critical-care physicians on earth, delivered the most empowering 2-minute message on cancer you’ll see this year. Key moments from the clip (watch it — it’s worth every second): • Cancer rates are rising fast — but most of the risk is modifiable • A large peer-reviewed PLOS ONE study showed that three simple, low-cost interventions — vitamin D, omega-3s, and regular exercise — reduced invasive cancer risk by ≈60% • Step one for everyone: move away from the inflammatory American diet that’s literally feeding the epidemic • Step two for higher-risk people (family history, genetics, previous cancer): evidence-based protocols using nutraceuticals and repurposed medicines that go even further — all backed by published science His closing line: “Cancer is a big risk and it’s increasing — but we now have real, proven tools to dramatically lower that risk. Let’s take this seriously and use them.” Pure hope backed by data. No fear, just facts and action. Watch the full 2:02 clip below and let it sink in. What’s the ONE change you’re making this week after hearing this?

Dr. Paul Marik, one of the most cited critical-care physicians on earth, delivered the most empowering 2-minute message on cancer you’ll see this year. Key moments from the clip (watch it — it’s worth every second): • Cancer rates are rising fast — but most of the risk is modifiable • A large peer-reviewed PLOS ONE study showed that three simple, low-cost interventions — vitamin D, omega-3s, and regular exercise — reduced invasive cancer risk by ≈60% • Step one for everyone: move away from the inflammatory American diet that’s literally feeding the epidemic • Step two for higher-risk people (family history, genetics, previous cancer): evidence-based protocols using nutraceuticals and repurposed medicines that go even further — all backed by published science His closing line: “Cancer is a big risk and it’s increasing — but we now have real, proven tools to dramatically lower that risk. Let’s take this seriously and use them.” Pure hope backed by data. No fear, just facts and action. Watch the full 2:02 clip below and let it sink in. What’s the ONE change you’re making this week after hearing this?

Camus

30,616 views • 7 months ago

If this holds up, it is absolutely mind blowing. 🤯 Reversing biological age by 50 to 75 percent in animals in weeks and now a first human trial cleared. We might be watching the first real crack in the concept of aging as inevitable.

If this holds up, it is absolutely mind blowing. 🤯 Reversing biological age by 50 to 75 percent in animals in weeks and now a first human trial cleared. We might be watching the first real crack in the concept of aging as inevitable.

VraserX e/acc

53,005 views • 4 months ago

We know the medical establishment lied to us about COVID. And according to esteemed physician Dr. Paul Marik, they are also lying to you about the sun. Here's a few things about Vitamin D that Big Pharma doesn't want you to know: #1 - "If you’re vitamin D deficient, it increases your risk of getting cancer.” “There’s a linear relationship between vitamin D deficiency and cancer. And the further you go away from the equator, the less UVB you get, the greater your risk of cancer. This has been well established!” drpaulmarik stressed. #2 - "Vitamin D is highly effective for the treatment of depression.” It’s also “very important for the immune system,” Dr. Marik added. “People don’t like vitamin D. They just don’t like it because if people took vitamin D, [they] would reduce the risk of cancer — would reduce the risk of many diseases." #3 - “If you avoid the sun, it increases your risk of dying [prematurely] by about 25%.” Dr. Marik recommended going into the sun for about 30 minutes a day. He advised not to use sunscreens because “it defeats the purpose.” “In fact, there’s some data that sunscreens increase your risk of melanoma — paradoxically.”

We know the medical establishment lied to us about COVID. And according to esteemed physician Dr. Paul Marik, they are also lying to you about the sun. Here's a few things about Vitamin D that Big Pharma doesn't want you to know: #1 - "If you’re vitamin D deficient, it increases your risk of getting cancer.” “There’s a linear relationship between vitamin D deficiency and cancer. And the further you go away from the equator, the less UVB you get, the greater your risk of cancer. This has been well established!” drpaulmarik stressed. #2 - "Vitamin D is highly effective for the treatment of depression.” It’s also “very important for the immune system,” Dr. Marik added. “People don’t like vitamin D. They just don’t like it because if people took vitamin D, [they] would reduce the risk of cancer — would reduce the risk of many diseases." #3 - “If you avoid the sun, it increases your risk of dying [prematurely] by about 25%.” Dr. Marik recommended going into the sun for about 30 minutes a day. He advised not to use sunscreens because “it defeats the purpose.” “In fact, there’s some data that sunscreens increase your risk of melanoma — paradoxically.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

169,533 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Dr. Peter McCullough Says the New Bird Flu Strain Has Lab Origins “This strain of bird flu is different. This looks like it has actually come from serial passage research done at the USDA Poultry Research Laboratory in Athens, Georgia … We're so sure of it, we've published this in a peer-reviewed paper … and it hasn't been disputed by any of the public health officials. We cite the USDA research.” Full Episode w/ Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®: The HighWire

🚨 Dr. Peter McCullough Says the New Bird Flu Strain Has Lab Origins “This strain of bird flu is different. This looks like it has actually come from serial passage research done at the USDA Poultry Research Laboratory in Athens, Georgia … We're so sure of it, we've published this in a peer-reviewed paper … and it hasn't been disputed by any of the public health officials. We cite the USDA research.” Full Episode w/ Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®: The HighWire

Chief Nerd

1,614,154 views • 1 year ago

Peer-Reviewed Study Reveals Alarming Cancer Link to COVID Vaccines A landmark study from Italy, published in the peer-reviewed Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal, has uncovered disturbing data on cancer risks following COVID-19 vaccination. While public health authorities in many countries, like the UK, have failed to provide transparent vaccinated vs. unvaccinated data, this independent research fills a critical gap. The findings, based on a 6-month follow-up, show a significant increase in cancer incidence among those who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine: • Colorectal Cancer: 34% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.34) • Breast Cancer: 54% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.54) • Bladder Cancer: 62% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.62) These hazard ratios point to a stark reality that can no longer be ignored. The study suggests the risk is not isolated but potentially affects "many types of cancers." The full paper is publicly available for scrutiny. This is no longer a "conspiracy theory" but a peer-reviewed finding demanding immediate investigation and accountability. Where is the urgent response from global health agencies?

Peer-Reviewed Study Reveals Alarming Cancer Link to COVID Vaccines A landmark study from Italy, published in the peer-reviewed Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal, has uncovered disturbing data on cancer risks following COVID-19 vaccination. While public health authorities in many countries, like the UK, have failed to provide transparent vaccinated vs. unvaccinated data, this independent research fills a critical gap. The findings, based on a 6-month follow-up, show a significant increase in cancer incidence among those who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine: • Colorectal Cancer: 34% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.34) • Breast Cancer: 54% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.54) • Bladder Cancer: 62% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.62) These hazard ratios point to a stark reality that can no longer be ignored. The study suggests the risk is not isolated but potentially affects "many types of cancers." The full paper is publicly available for scrutiny. This is no longer a "conspiracy theory" but a peer-reviewed finding demanding immediate investigation and accountability. Where is the urgent response from global health agencies?

Camus

57,873 views • 9 months ago

🚨 The Paxil scandal is an astonishing example of how drug data can be hidden and spun—and then sold to kids. “In the late 90s, the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline or GSK did a series of trials and found that the drug was no better than placebo. …There was an email that was sent to staff where GSK said that [it] would be commercially unacceptable to disclose the poor efficacy data of this drug. So instead of telling the truth, they hired a PR firm to write the medical journal for them, to ghostwrite the article and put a positive spin on it, and then that was submitted to the journal, and it was published in 2001. And it wasn't long before the regulators in the US and also in Europe discovered that the drug actually was increasing the risk of suicidal ideation. It was doing the exact opposite of what the drug was meant to do. And so they put out a warning saying that this drug showed no efficacy in children and adolescents, but the drug continued to be marketed off-label…because the prominent journal had published this peer-reviewed paper. GSK purchased thousands of pre-prints and sent them out to all their representatives, and then they went to doctors, giving free samples, saying this drug is safe and effective for children. And I think within a time span of three years, GSK made over a billion dollars in sales from a drug that had never proven to be safe or effective in children and adolescents.” -Investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi, PhD

🚨 The Paxil scandal is an astonishing example of how drug data can be hidden and spun—and then sold to kids. “In the late 90s, the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline or GSK did a series of trials and found that the drug was no better than placebo. …There was an email that was sent to staff where GSK said that [it] would be commercially unacceptable to disclose the poor efficacy data of this drug. So instead of telling the truth, they hired a PR firm to write the medical journal for them, to ghostwrite the article and put a positive spin on it, and then that was submitted to the journal, and it was published in 2001. And it wasn't long before the regulators in the US and also in Europe discovered that the drug actually was increasing the risk of suicidal ideation. It was doing the exact opposite of what the drug was meant to do. And so they put out a warning saying that this drug showed no efficacy in children and adolescents, but the drug continued to be marketed off-label…because the prominent journal had published this peer-reviewed paper. GSK purchased thousands of pre-prints and sent them out to all their representatives, and then they went to doctors, giving free samples, saying this drug is safe and effective for children. And I think within a time span of three years, GSK made over a billion dollars in sales from a drug that had never proven to be safe or effective in children and adolescents.” -Investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Jan Jekielek

140,141 views • 7 months ago

BREAKING: Robert Malone MD calls for covid mod RNA injections to be withdrawn from the market because they are "Adulterated, plain and simple". This rides on the back of peer reviewed evidence from Speicher, McKernan, Rose and evidence by Professor Phillip Buckhaults. Professor Buckhaults: “The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with Plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA...it's got bits of DNA in it [and I know] because I sequenced it in my own lab”. Phillip Buckhaults PhD: "I can see what's in their [and] I'm kind of alarmed by the possible consequences of this [and] you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there" Phillip Buckhaults, PhD Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Professor of Molecular Biology & Genetics

BREAKING: Robert Malone MD calls for covid mod RNA injections to be withdrawn from the market because they are "Adulterated, plain and simple". This rides on the back of peer reviewed evidence from Speicher, McKernan, Rose and evidence by Professor Phillip Buckhaults. Professor Buckhaults: “The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with Plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA...it's got bits of DNA in it [and I know] because I sequenced it in my own lab”. Phillip Buckhaults PhD: "I can see what's in their [and] I'm kind of alarmed by the possible consequences of this [and] you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there" Phillip Buckhaults, PhD Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Professor of Molecular Biology & Genetics

Humanspective

18,244 views • 8 months ago

REPORT: A shocking cancer-vaccine study was nearly buried by a cyberattack—until the censorship attempt blew up in Big Pharma’s face. Just days later, in a bizarre twist, Pfizer tried to recruit one of the paper’s lead authors. The peer-reviewed paper, published January 3 in Oncotarget, reviewed 69 global studies and documented 333 cases of new or rapidly progressing cancer following COVID vaccination. Just as the bombshell study went live, the journal’s website was mysteriously taken offline by a cyberattack. However, the blackout backfired. Instead of silencing the findings, it triggered a worldwide surge of interest. PDFs, links, and screenshots went viral. Then it got stranger: a Pfizer headhunter contacted the study's co-author, Dr. Wafik El-Deiry, praising his credentials and offering senior roles at the company. He rejected the outreach and went public—calling it “ironic” and doubling down on the urgent need to investigate vaccine safety. Meanwhile, the FBI won’t confirm if it’s investigating the cyberattack. And Dr. Robert Malone says Dr. Marty Makary—handpicked by RFK Jr.—could pull the shots today… but won’t. Someone tried to censor this cancer-vaccine study. The question is: who—and why? Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's explosive report:👇

REPORT: A shocking cancer-vaccine study was nearly buried by a cyberattack—until the censorship attempt blew up in Big Pharma’s face. Just days later, in a bizarre twist, Pfizer tried to recruit one of the paper’s lead authors. The peer-reviewed paper, published January 3 in Oncotarget, reviewed 69 global studies and documented 333 cases of new or rapidly progressing cancer following COVID vaccination. Just as the bombshell study went live, the journal’s website was mysteriously taken offline by a cyberattack. However, the blackout backfired. Instead of silencing the findings, it triggered a worldwide surge of interest. PDFs, links, and screenshots went viral. Then it got stranger: a Pfizer headhunter contacted the study's co-author, Dr. Wafik El-Deiry, praising his credentials and offering senior roles at the company. He rejected the outreach and went public—calling it “ironic” and doubling down on the urgent need to investigate vaccine safety. Meanwhile, the FBI won’t confirm if it’s investigating the cyberattack. And Dr. Robert Malone says Dr. Marty Makary—handpicked by RFK Jr.—could pull the shots today… but won’t. Someone tried to censor this cancer-vaccine study. The question is: who—and why? Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's explosive report:👇

Vigilant Fox 🦊

118,283 views • 6 months ago

"The Largest Autopsy Series in the World" censored by powerful pharmaceutical interest: "we found that about 74% of the cases of sudden death were caused or contributed to by the vaccine" William Makis, working with Dr Peter McCullough and other Drs. was set to be published with the Lancet, but after hundreds of thousands of downloads, Big Pharma put pressure on the journal. Lancet "took the paper down", so they had to go to another publisher, which notified Makis MD hours before this clip was recorded, that it passed peer review. William Makis MD: "[We] submitted a vaccine injury paper to the Lancet, to one of the biggest journals in the world, co authored by Doctor Peter Mccullough myself, Doctor Mark Trozzi Doctor Roger Hodgkinson and other doctors that paper was [the] largest autopsy series in the world of covid vaccine people who took Covid 19 vaccines and then died suddenly a few days or a few weeks after." "That paper was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times and within 24 hours there was so much pressure put on by the pharmaceutical industry, that the Lancet took the paper down [and] basically wanted to cancel it forever" "I just found out a few hours ago that that paper has passed peer reviewed and is going to be published" It looks like the "peer review" process is shielding the pharmaceutical industry from liability

"The Largest Autopsy Series in the World" censored by powerful pharmaceutical interest: "we found that about 74% of the cases of sudden death were caused or contributed to by the vaccine" William Makis, working with Dr Peter McCullough and other Drs. was set to be published with the Lancet, but after hundreds of thousands of downloads, Big Pharma put pressure on the journal. Lancet "took the paper down", so they had to go to another publisher, which notified Makis MD hours before this clip was recorded, that it passed peer review. William Makis MD: "[We] submitted a vaccine injury paper to the Lancet, to one of the biggest journals in the world, co authored by Doctor Peter Mccullough myself, Doctor Mark Trozzi Doctor Roger Hodgkinson and other doctors that paper was [the] largest autopsy series in the world of covid vaccine people who took Covid 19 vaccines and then died suddenly a few days or a few weeks after." "That paper was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times and within 24 hours there was so much pressure put on by the pharmaceutical industry, that the Lancet took the paper down [and] basically wanted to cancel it forever" "I just found out a few hours ago that that paper has passed peer reviewed and is going to be published" It looks like the "peer review" process is shielding the pharmaceutical industry from liability

Humanspective

282,263 views • 1 year ago

🚨 MUST WATCH: Cancer Genomics Expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults Testifies to the SC Senate on the DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines "The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA...I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this...It could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest...This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix...It's different from RNA because it can be permanent...It could cause theoretically...a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people...There's probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine...This is a bad idea." @P_J_Buckhaults Kevin McKernan Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® Robert W Malone, MD

🚨 MUST WATCH: Cancer Genomics Expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults Testifies to the SC Senate on the DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines "The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA...I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this...It could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest...This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix...It's different from RNA because it can be permanent...It could cause theoretically...a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people...There's probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine...This is a bad idea." @P_J_Buckhaults Kevin McKernan Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® Robert W Malone, MD

Chief Nerd

6,097,873 views • 2 years ago

Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells Joe Rogan that a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original clinical trial data shows that their COVID mRNA vaccines *INCREASE* your risks of serious adverse events, hospitalization, and death: "In my whole career, looking at all of the drugs and knowing about many different prescribed medications, I've never seen something that when you look at the data has such poor effectiveness and unprecedented harms. In the summer of last year, in the journal Vaccine, the highest-impact medical journal for vaccines, they published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double-blinded randomized controlled trial. This is the highest quality of scientific evidence. Joseph Fraiman is an ER doctor and clinical data scientist from Louisiana. Associate editor of the BMJ, Dr. Peter Doshi. Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford. Some real eminence of integrity published this reanalysis, and what they found was this. In the trials that led to the approval of regulators worldwide, you were more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, or life-changing event than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. This mRNA vaccine should likely have never been approved for a single human in the first place, and that rate of serious adverse events is at least 1 in 800... 1 in 800 is a very, very high figure. We've pulled other vaccines for much less. The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a debilitating neurological condition called Guillan-Barre syndrome in about 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine was suspended in 1999 because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in kids in 1 of 10,000. This is at least 1 in 800. It's a no-brainer. So the question is, why have we not paused it?" Study: Dr Aseem Malhotra Joe Rogan

Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells Joe Rogan that a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original clinical trial data shows that their COVID mRNA vaccines INCREASE your risks of serious adverse events, hospitalization, and death: "In my whole career, looking at all of the drugs and knowing about many different prescribed medications, I've never seen something that when you look at the data has such poor effectiveness and unprecedented harms. In the summer of last year, in the journal Vaccine, the highest-impact medical journal for vaccines, they published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double-blinded randomized controlled trial. This is the highest quality of scientific evidence. Joseph Fraiman is an ER doctor and clinical data scientist from Louisiana. Associate editor of the BMJ, Dr. Peter Doshi. Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford. Some real eminence of integrity published this reanalysis, and what they found was this. In the trials that led to the approval of regulators worldwide, you were more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, or life-changing event than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. This mRNA vaccine should likely have never been approved for a single human in the first place, and that rate of serious adverse events is at least 1 in 800... 1 in 800 is a very, very high figure. We've pulled other vaccines for much less. The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a debilitating neurological condition called Guillan-Barre syndrome in about 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine was suspended in 1999 because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in kids in 1 of 10,000. This is at least 1 in 800. It's a no-brainer. So the question is, why have we not paused it?" Study: Dr Aseem Malhotra Joe Rogan

KanekoaTheGreat

2,292,527 views • 3 years ago

Chemotherapy prolongs life by just 2-3 months for most cancers—and for some, like gastric cancer, it can actually reduce life expectancy. According to Dr. Paul Marik, chemo doesn’t just fail to save lives; it may even help cancer spread by causing metastasis and activating cancer stem cells. While Big Pharma makes billions, patients are left with medical bills over $100,000 a year. Around 50-60% of cancer patients face financial ruin just trying to survive. Dr. Marik points to affordable alternatives like ivermectin, mebendazole, and fenbendazole as potentially effective first-line treatments for cancer—but don’t expect Big Pharma to promote cheap solutions that cut into profits. Is it time to challenge the cancer industry’s narrative?

Chemotherapy prolongs life by just 2-3 months for most cancers—and for some, like gastric cancer, it can actually reduce life expectancy. According to Dr. Paul Marik, chemo doesn’t just fail to save lives; it may even help cancer spread by causing metastasis and activating cancer stem cells. While Big Pharma makes billions, patients are left with medical bills over $100,000 a year. Around 50-60% of cancer patients face financial ruin just trying to survive. Dr. Marik points to affordable alternatives like ivermectin, mebendazole, and fenbendazole as potentially effective first-line treatments for cancer—but don’t expect Big Pharma to promote cheap solutions that cut into profits. Is it time to challenge the cancer industry’s narrative?

Joe Tippens

139,255 views • 10 months ago

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”

Wall Street Apes

339,709 views • 2 years ago

In 1992, Congress passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act. This converted the FDA into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. It allowed the pharmaceutical industry to pay the FDA user fees in order to fast-track their drugs. Roughly 65% of the drug approvers salaries at FDA come directly from the user fees paid by the pharmaceutical industry. This is not in the benefit of American people or our children—it’s to line their pockets and do the bidding of the pharmaceutical industry.

In 1992, Congress passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act. This converted the FDA into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. It allowed the pharmaceutical industry to pay the FDA user fees in order to fast-track their drugs. Roughly 65% of the drug approvers salaries at FDA come directly from the user fees paid by the pharmaceutical industry. This is not in the benefit of American people or our children—it’s to line their pockets and do the bidding of the pharmaceutical industry.

Leslie Manookian

66,318 views • 10 months ago

🚨 The mainstream media and global health authorities are completely oversimplifying the latest virus outbreak by acting like we already know exactly how to handle it. Much of the reassurance given to the public rests on outdated medical tools that may not even apply to this specific, fast-moving strain. Health expert Dr. Robert Malone says the real danger is being exacerbated by intense geopolitical context and local human displacement behind the headlines. He notes that we will never truly comprehend the threat if we keep treating a complex, multi-layered crisis like a simple medical story. Robert W Malone, MD

🚨 The mainstream media and global health authorities are completely oversimplifying the latest virus outbreak by acting like we already know exactly how to handle it. Much of the reassurance given to the public rests on outdated medical tools that may not even apply to this specific, fast-moving strain. Health expert Dr. Robert Malone says the real danger is being exacerbated by intense geopolitical context and local human displacement behind the headlines. He notes that we will never truly comprehend the threat if we keep treating a complex, multi-layered crisis like a simple medical story. Robert W Malone, MD

Mario Nawfal

24,911 views • 1 month ago

Dr. Rhonda Patrick highlights a game-changing study: Sedentary 50-year-olds who did 5–6 hours/week of structured exercise (moderate + vigorous, including high-intensity intervals) for 2 years reversed ~20 years of heart aging. Their hearts became less stiff, more compliant, and structurally looked like healthy 30-year-olds — improving filling/pumping, exercise capacity, and slashing risks for hypertension, heart attack, and heart failure. Key quote: "Their hearts looked 20 years younger in terms of structure... Holy cow." This is from Dr. Benjamin Levine's randomized trial (published 2018 in Circulation) — proof that it's never too late to fight cardiac aging, even starting in midlife. Motivating evidence: Exercise isn't just prevention — it can rewind the clock on your heart. What's your go-to way to hit vigorous movement this week?

Dr. Rhonda Patrick highlights a game-changing study: Sedentary 50-year-olds who did 5–6 hours/week of structured exercise (moderate + vigorous, including high-intensity intervals) for 2 years reversed ~20 years of heart aging. Their hearts became less stiff, more compliant, and structurally looked like healthy 30-year-olds — improving filling/pumping, exercise capacity, and slashing risks for hypertension, heart attack, and heart failure. Key quote: "Their hearts looked 20 years younger in terms of structure... Holy cow." This is from Dr. Benjamin Levine's randomized trial (published 2018 in Circulation) — proof that it's never too late to fight cardiac aging, even starting in midlife. Motivating evidence: Exercise isn't just prevention — it can rewind the clock on your heart. What's your go-to way to hit vigorous movement this week?

Camus

89,416 views • 4 months ago