正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

This is absolutely mind-blowing. A simple routine of getting sunshine, eating fish, and moderate exercise can slash your cancer risk by 60%. If this were a pharmaceutical drug, it would dominate headlines and make hundreds of billions of dollars. But because it doesn’t pad Big Pharma’s pockets, mainstream outlets... show more

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,971,509 subscribers

199,616 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 的头像

The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 年前

Watch the Full Video: The Vitamin D Miracle Supplement

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 的头像

The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 年前

Top Doctor Reveals Forbidden Cancer Prevention Secrets

Naveen Sankar S 的头像

Naveen Sankar S1 年前

🌱 The gut-lung axis may hold the key to managing asthma, COPD, and ARDS. Explore how gut health may influence respiratory diseases and the future of targeted therapies. Check out the latest research at #GutLungAxis #Microbiome #LungHealth #health #news

Ben Hutter 的头像

Ben Hutter1 年前

Almost like being healthy decreases your risk of being unhealthy 😂

The Austin Conservative 🇺🇸🤘 的头像

The Austin Conservative 🇺🇸🤘1 年前

They want us fat, sick, and unhealthy so they can make as much money as possible. Healthy people aren’t as profitable to them.

Lorified 的头像

Lorified1 年前

Getting the sunshine and healthy fish is a big problem.

Roberto Phillip 的头像

Roberto Phillip1 年前

Is that Malone?

HeHaTeMe 的头像

HeHaTeMe1 年前

Big Pharma's silence on this cancer-fighting routine shows they value profits over lives. Sunlight, healthy foods, exercise, and daily intermittent fasting hurt their earnings. Your body is built to heal itself.

Shaffer 的头像

Shaffer1 年前

Ok. I looked at the study. Participants didn’t eat fish. They were given Omega-3 supplements. Makes sense. So take Omega-3 supplements, D3 supplements and get some exercise. You don’t really need sunshine or nasty fish.

Frank white 的头像

Frank white1 年前

A healthy Mediterranean diet can’t be bad as the folks over there live longer than Americans as a whole do.

feelo 的头像

feelo1 年前

Catastrophic news… for big pharma shareholders

相关视频

This is one of the biggest stories the TV isn't telling you. You can reduce your risk of cancer, the #2 killer in the world, by 60%, according to findings from a recent study. How? Three simple interventions: #1 - Supplement with Vitamin D #2 - Supplement with omega-3 fatty acids #3 - Implement a simple home exercise program into your life A 60 percent reduction in cancer risk is absolutely astounding. So, why is this information not making headlines? Because the healthier you are, the less money there is to be made.

This is one of the biggest stories the TV isn't telling you. You can reduce your risk of cancer, the #2 killer in the world, by 60%, according to findings from a recent study. How? Three simple interventions: #1 - Supplement with Vitamin D #2 - Supplement with omega-3 fatty acids #3 - Implement a simple home exercise program into your life A 60 percent reduction in cancer risk is absolutely astounding. So, why is this information not making headlines? Because the healthier you are, the less money there is to be made.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,433,096 次观看 • 2 年前

If this holds up, it is absolutely mind blowing. 🤯 Reversing biological age by 50 to 75 percent in animals in weeks and now a first human trial cleared. We might be watching the first real crack in the concept of aging as inevitable.

If this holds up, it is absolutely mind blowing. 🤯 Reversing biological age by 50 to 75 percent in animals in weeks and now a first human trial cleared. We might be watching the first real crack in the concept of aging as inevitable.

VraserX e/acc

53,005 次观看 • 4 个月前

‼️🚨Dr. Charles Hoff explains what a fully peer-reviewed study from the prestigious Cleveland Clinic found out about the number of 'vaccines' a person has, in relation to what their risk of getting covid is 👀 We are censored. If u can see this say yes!👇

‼️🚨Dr. Charles Hoff explains what a fully peer-reviewed study from the prestigious Cleveland Clinic found out about the number of 'vaccines' a person has, in relation to what their risk of getting covid is 👀 We are censored. If u can see this say yes!👇

Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News🥜

64,137 次观看 • 2 年前

Curing cancer would result in a loss of billions of dollars in profits for oncologists, drug companies, hospitals and clinics.

Curing cancer would result in a loss of billions of dollars in profits for oncologists, drug companies, hospitals and clinics.

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

15,820 次观看 • 7 个月前

Peer-Reviewed Study Reveals Alarming Cancer Link to COVID Vaccines A landmark study from Italy, published in the peer-reviewed Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal, has uncovered disturbing data on cancer risks following COVID-19 vaccination. While public health authorities in many countries, like the UK, have failed to provide transparent vaccinated vs. unvaccinated data, this independent research fills a critical gap. The findings, based on a 6-month follow-up, show a significant increase in cancer incidence among those who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine: • Colorectal Cancer: 34% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.34) • Breast Cancer: 54% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.54) • Bladder Cancer: 62% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.62) These hazard ratios point to a stark reality that can no longer be ignored. The study suggests the risk is not isolated but potentially affects "many types of cancers." The full paper is publicly available for scrutiny. This is no longer a "conspiracy theory" but a peer-reviewed finding demanding immediate investigation and accountability. Where is the urgent response from global health agencies?

Peer-Reviewed Study Reveals Alarming Cancer Link to COVID Vaccines A landmark study from Italy, published in the peer-reviewed Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal, has uncovered disturbing data on cancer risks following COVID-19 vaccination. While public health authorities in many countries, like the UK, have failed to provide transparent vaccinated vs. unvaccinated data, this independent research fills a critical gap. The findings, based on a 6-month follow-up, show a significant increase in cancer incidence among those who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine: • Colorectal Cancer: 34% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.34) • Breast Cancer: 54% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.54) • Bladder Cancer: 62% increased risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.62) These hazard ratios point to a stark reality that can no longer be ignored. The study suggests the risk is not isolated but potentially affects "many types of cancers." The full paper is publicly available for scrutiny. This is no longer a "conspiracy theory" but a peer-reviewed finding demanding immediate investigation and accountability. Where is the urgent response from global health agencies?

Camus

57,873 次观看 • 9 个月前

Curing cancer would result in a loss of billions of dollars in profits for oncologists, drug companies, hospitals and clinics. Follow the dots

Curing cancer would result in a loss of billions of dollars in profits for oncologists, drug companies, hospitals and clinics. Follow the dots

illuminatibot

82,211 次观看 • 8 个月前

One of the most followed cancer researchers in the world, Dr. William Makis, is honored and proud to be part of a large research study spearheaded by yours truly. A study of this scale, involving over 4,000 patients, requires strong support. We are counting on your help so we can gather and publish the data in a peer-reviewed journal and bring this important research to the world.

One of the most followed cancer researchers in the world, Dr. William Makis, is honored and proud to be part of a large research study spearheaded by yours truly. A study of this scale, involving over 4,000 patients, requires strong support. We are counting on your help so we can gather and publish the data in a peer-reviewed journal and bring this important research to the world.

Marivic Villa, MD, FCCP

17,436 次观看 • 8 个月前

This won’t be talked about a lot because the 49ers scored on the next play, but the throw from Brock Purdy and the catch by Jake Tonges were incredible. If it was reviewed, it would have been a touchdown

This won’t be talked about a lot because the 49ers scored on the next play, but the throw from Brock Purdy and the catch by Jake Tonges were incredible. If it was reviewed, it would have been a touchdown

Coach Yac 🗣

207,902 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 The Paxil scandal is an astonishing example of how drug data can be hidden and spun—and then sold to kids. “In the late 90s, the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline or GSK did a series of trials and found that the drug was no better than placebo. …There was an email that was sent to staff where GSK said that [it] would be commercially unacceptable to disclose the poor efficacy data of this drug. So instead of telling the truth, they hired a PR firm to write the medical journal for them, to ghostwrite the article and put a positive spin on it, and then that was submitted to the journal, and it was published in 2001. And it wasn't long before the regulators in the US and also in Europe discovered that the drug actually was increasing the risk of suicidal ideation. It was doing the exact opposite of what the drug was meant to do. And so they put out a warning saying that this drug showed no efficacy in children and adolescents, but the drug continued to be marketed off-label…because the prominent journal had published this peer-reviewed paper. GSK purchased thousands of pre-prints and sent them out to all their representatives, and then they went to doctors, giving free samples, saying this drug is safe and effective for children. And I think within a time span of three years, GSK made over a billion dollars in sales from a drug that had never proven to be safe or effective in children and adolescents.” -Investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi, PhD

🚨 The Paxil scandal is an astonishing example of how drug data can be hidden and spun—and then sold to kids. “In the late 90s, the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline or GSK did a series of trials and found that the drug was no better than placebo. …There was an email that was sent to staff where GSK said that [it] would be commercially unacceptable to disclose the poor efficacy data of this drug. So instead of telling the truth, they hired a PR firm to write the medical journal for them, to ghostwrite the article and put a positive spin on it, and then that was submitted to the journal, and it was published in 2001. And it wasn't long before the regulators in the US and also in Europe discovered that the drug actually was increasing the risk of suicidal ideation. It was doing the exact opposite of what the drug was meant to do. And so they put out a warning saying that this drug showed no efficacy in children and adolescents, but the drug continued to be marketed off-label…because the prominent journal had published this peer-reviewed paper. GSK purchased thousands of pre-prints and sent them out to all their representatives, and then they went to doctors, giving free samples, saying this drug is safe and effective for children. And I think within a time span of three years, GSK made over a billion dollars in sales from a drug that had never proven to be safe or effective in children and adolescents.” -Investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Jan Jekielek

140,141 次观看 • 7 个月前

Curing cancer would result in a loss of billions of dollars in profits for oncologists, drug companies, hospitals and clinics. Follow the dots 👁️

Curing cancer would result in a loss of billions of dollars in profits for oncologists, drug companies, hospitals and clinics. Follow the dots 👁️

ephex

121,393 次观看 • 1 年前

Sen. Brian Schatz: If this deal is so good, why can't the public see it? Donald Trump hasn't made anything materially better. 13 service members dead. 3,000 Iranians killed, billions of dollars, maybe hundreds of billions of dollars in 3 months, and prices spiked everywhere. There is a reason they are not publishing this deal and it's because it makes plain that this is one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in many generations.

Sen. Brian Schatz: If this deal is so good, why can't the public see it? Donald Trump hasn't made anything materially better. 13 service members dead. 3,000 Iranians killed, billions of dollars, maybe hundreds of billions of dollars in 3 months, and prices spiked everywhere. There is a reason they are not publishing this deal and it's because it makes plain that this is one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in many generations.

Headquarters

173,302 次观看 • 25 天前

BONO: “300,000 people have already died from this hard cut of USAID” ROGAN: “It was a money laundering operation … Billions of dollars are missing … Elon Musk said if any of this was done by a public company, the company would be delisted and the executives would be in prison”

BONO: “300,000 people have already died from this hard cut of USAID” ROGAN: “It was a money laundering operation … Billions of dollars are missing … Elon Musk said if any of this was done by a public company, the company would be delisted and the executives would be in prison”

Chief Nerd

13,865,621 次观看 • 1 年前

Sharing some thoughts from the week. It’s been a big year, a lot of global chaos but a lot of good things too. If you were to describe this year in one word what would it be?

Sharing some thoughts from the week. It’s been a big year, a lot of global chaos but a lot of good things too. If you were to describe this year in one word what would it be?

iyah may

25,176 次观看 • 6 个月前

The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) today published a peer-reviewed original paper with the results of a landmark clinical trial of our PRIMA brain-computer interface (BCI) retinal implant.

The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) today published a peer-reviewed original paper with the results of a landmark clinical trial of our PRIMA brain-computer interface (BCI) retinal implant.

Science Corporation

29,275 次观看 • 8 个月前

Exercise can lower your blood pressure as effectively as medication A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found that 20-60 minutes of moderate to vigorous activity, 3-4 days a week, over just 6 weeks, can yield antihypertensive effects comparable to drugs The key is effort and consistency—no shortcuts here And if you’re willing to put in the work, the benefits of exercise go far beyond just lowering your blood pressure

Exercise can lower your blood pressure as effectively as medication A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found that 20-60 minutes of moderate to vigorous activity, 3-4 days a week, over just 6 weeks, can yield antihypertensive effects comparable to drugs The key is effort and consistency—no shortcuts here And if you’re willing to put in the work, the benefits of exercise go far beyond just lowering your blood pressure

FoundMyFitness Clips

33,856 次观看 • 1 年前

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”

Wall Street Apes

339,699 次观看 • 2 年前

'If you could have exercise a pill it would be hailed as a miracle drug' Olympic champion Sir Chris Hoy, who has prostate cancer, and Mel Erwin who is living with stage four lung cancer, spoke to #BBCBreakfast about the benefits of exercise in the treatment of cancer

'If you could have exercise a pill it would be hailed as a miracle drug' Olympic champion Sir Chris Hoy, who has prostate cancer, and Mel Erwin who is living with stage four lung cancer, spoke to #BBCBreakfast about the benefits of exercise in the treatment of cancer

BBC Breakfast

143,094 次观看 • 1 年前

In case you're still unaware... If not for the work of Dr Diane Hennacy Powell, The The Telepathy Tapes would not exist. This was uploaded to YT on Nov 25th, 2014. Hopefully, after all this time, we finally get the proof we're looking for, experiments conducted under tight controls, and an article published in a mainstream, peer-reviewed journal.

In case you're still unaware... If not for the work of Dr Diane Hennacy Powell, The The Telepathy Tapes would not exist. This was uploaded to YT on Nov 25th, 2014. Hopefully, after all this time, we finally get the proof we're looking for, experiments conducted under tight controls, and an article published in a mainstream, peer-reviewed journal.

Joe Murgia

14,834 次观看 • 1 年前

If the roles were reversed, this would dominate headlines. But because it challenges the narrative, the left’s media silence is deafening.

If the roles were reversed, this would dominate headlines. But because it challenges the narrative, the left’s media silence is deafening.

Jeffery Mead

81,370 次观看 • 1 年前