This is atheism in a nutshell. 🔥

He’s accidentally proving a point in favor of religion. Science books have changed dramatically over the centuries. Religious books have remained remarkably consistent for 1000’s of years.

“Those religious books would either never exist or be totally different!” Can you prove that?

You also can’t prove atheism tho

This is an awful argument. It completely misrepresents science and how it works, and more importantly doesn’t. Science, by definition, does not “prove” things, and most certainly sees its textbooks change. There may be decent arguments for atheism, but this most definitely isn’t it. @rickygervais

All you gotta do is look at the beautiful nature around us. No way this all came about by a coincidence.

Not quite right that. Atheism - definitely no god Agnostic - don’t know, don’t care @rickygervais Atheism is fervent in its belief that there’s no God That’s the difference

You should pay attention more; you might see some miracles every day.

Science has yet to explain how something can be created from nothing. Until then I will believe in the only answer - God.

He's a retard

Not true at all. The science books were written based on hypotheses that were subjectively chosen. It’s extremely unlikely that they would be exactly the same.