Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 THIS IS CALLED REMOVING EVIDENCE FROM A CRIME SCENE

The Force

13,216 subscribers

34,484 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 THIS IS CALLED REMOVING EVIDENCE FROM A CRIME SCENE

🚨 THIS IS CALLED REMOVING EVIDENCE FROM A CRIME SCENE

The Force

21,525 views • 4 days ago

Candace Owens 🚨 THIS IS CALLED REMOVING EVIDENCE FROM A CRIME SCENE

Candace Owens 🚨 THIS IS CALLED REMOVING EVIDENCE FROM A CRIME SCENE

The Force

28,220 views • 15 days ago

Batohi is presented with another video evidence of General Booysen at a murder scene where a suspect had been shot and he refused for an ambulance to be called. Booysen only agreed to call the ambulance after the suspect had died. Booysen is accused of tempering with the crime scene and removing spent cartridges. Batohi ignored all this evidence against Booysen and shielded him from prosecution.

Batohi is presented with another video evidence of General Booysen at a murder scene where a suspect had been shot and he refused for an ambulance to be called. Booysen only agreed to call the ambulance after the suspect had died. Booysen is accused of tempering with the crime scene and removing spent cartridges. Batohi ignored all this evidence against Booysen and shielded him from prosecution.

Sentletse 🇿🇦🇷🇺🇵🇸🇱🇧

13,982 views • 8 months ago

It’s suspicious that TPUSA was caught red-headed tampering and removing evidence from a crime scene and nobody in law enforcement did anything about it.

It’s suspicious that TPUSA was caught red-headed tampering and removing evidence from a crime scene and nobody in law enforcement did anything about it.

Stew Peters

38,524 views • 8 months ago

🚨 Forensic expert is hinting that Erika Kirk is a self-entitled moron for removing crime scene evidence to use as memorabilia. Do you agree? I'm kind of on the fence; I can’t decide if she is self-entitled or if she just is a moron.

🚨 Forensic expert is hinting that Erika Kirk is a self-entitled moron for removing crime scene evidence to use as memorabilia. Do you agree? I'm kind of on the fence; I can’t decide if she is self-entitled or if she just is a moron.

Grace Ashford

71,246 views • 15 days ago

🚨 WATCH: Syrian forces with ISIS patches are taking a body of a little Druze girl from their crime scene in order to destroy evidence of their Massacre.

🚨 WATCH: Syrian forces with ISIS patches are taking a body of a little Druze girl from their crime scene in order to destroy evidence of their Massacre.

Voice From The East

81,921 views • 1 year ago

BANNON: This is why Fani Willis indicted Trump, Rudy, and Cleta. It was protection. She wanted a firebreak between the real crime and the evidence of the 2020 election. The evidence is a crime scene right now. It’s sitting inside a 600,000 square foot warehouse.

BANNON: This is why Fani Willis indicted Trump, Rudy, and Cleta. It was protection. She wanted a firebreak between the real crime and the evidence of the 2020 election. The evidence is a crime scene right now. It’s sitting inside a 600,000 square foot warehouse.

Grace Chong, MBI

90,303 views • 6 months ago

Brown's mistake is to think that the Court is a joke. He laughed when the IO was reading evidence from the crime scene. Until he mentioned "forensic evidence and CCTV footage". His lawyers must tell him this is not #MadlangaCommission where he was silly!! #BrownMogotsi

Brown's mistake is to think that the Court is a joke. He laughed when the IO was reading evidence from the crime scene. Until he mentioned "forensic evidence and CCTV footage". His lawyers must tell him this is not #MadlangaCommission where he was silly!! #BrownMogotsi

Tau e Tshehadi

42,250 views • 3 months ago

all the while the crime scene is compromised. Evidence is being censored. The narrative is forced.

all the while the crime scene is compromised. Evidence is being censored. The narrative is forced.

Sebastian™

23,054 views • 11 months ago

🚨 THE FBI ADMITS SEARCHERS LITTERED THE NANCY GUTHRIE CRIME SCENE — AND NOW THEY WANT YOU TO TRUST THE DNA This isn’t a leak. This isn’t a rumor. It’s from the FBI’s own statement. Investigators collected SIXTEEN gloves near the Nancy Guthrie crime scene. Most of them were searchers’ gloves - pulled off and discarded across the area during the search. Read that again. The crime scene wasn’t preserved. It was CONTAMINATED. People walking through the area. Removing gloves. Throwing them into fields and along roadsides. Then, after all of that, the FBI says ONE glove, found two miles away, contains unknown male DNA and “appears to match” the subject seen in surveillance footage. That DNA is now being processed by Federal Bureau of Investigation and prepared for entry into CODIS. This is Kash Patel’s FBI. This is their evidence handling. This is their chain of custody. So let’s be very clear about what they’re asking you to accept: • A crime scene flooded with discarded gloves • Evidence handled after contamination • DNA processed days later • And total trust in the results If searchers were literally littering the crime scene… how does anyone know which DNA belongs to a suspect - and which belongs to the people trampling through the evidence? Is this gross incompetence... or the perfect built-in excuse when the evidence doesn’t line up?

🚨 THE FBI ADMITS SEARCHERS LITTERED THE NANCY GUTHRIE CRIME SCENE — AND NOW THEY WANT YOU TO TRUST THE DNA This isn’t a leak. This isn’t a rumor. It’s from the FBI’s own statement. Investigators collected SIXTEEN gloves near the Nancy Guthrie crime scene. Most of them were searchers’ gloves - pulled off and discarded across the area during the search. Read that again. The crime scene wasn’t preserved. It was CONTAMINATED. People walking through the area. Removing gloves. Throwing them into fields and along roadsides. Then, after all of that, the FBI says ONE glove, found two miles away, contains unknown male DNA and “appears to match” the subject seen in surveillance footage. That DNA is now being processed by Federal Bureau of Investigation and prepared for entry into CODIS. This is Kash Patel’s FBI. This is their evidence handling. This is their chain of custody. So let’s be very clear about what they’re asking you to accept: • A crime scene flooded with discarded gloves • Evidence handled after contamination • DNA processed days later • And total trust in the results If searchers were literally littering the crime scene… how does anyone know which DNA belongs to a suspect - and which belongs to the people trampling through the evidence? Is this gross incompetence... or the perfect built-in excuse when the evidence doesn’t line up?

HustleBitch

280,035 views • 6 months ago

X Market News🚨 Thank you .Lara Logan for stepping up to shine your big spotlight on this crime scene called #MMTLP

X Market News🚨 Thank you .Lara Logan for stepping up to shine your big spotlight on this crime scene called #MMTLP

Ann Vandersteel™️

25,969 views • 3 days ago

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 5 Minutes after Charlie was Shot, a Man is Spotted removing the overhead Video Camera, Directly over Charlie Kirk’s Head This is an active crime scene… blood everywhere… and he’s standing in it? Why is he removing anything? Was he standing on top of the chair Charlie was shot in? This is a disgrace.

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 5 Minutes after Charlie was Shot, a Man is Spotted removing the overhead Video Camera, Directly over Charlie Kirk’s Head This is an active crime scene… blood everywhere… and he’s standing in it? Why is he removing anything? Was he standing on top of the chair Charlie was shot in? This is a disgrace.

MJTruthUltra

12,276,842 views • 11 months ago

🚨 President @NayibBukele is absolutely DELIVERING across El Salvador, building infrastructure, crushing crime, and transforming the country. And this is the love and massive support pouring in from the Salvadoran people! Removing corrupt judges works.

🚨 President @NayibBukele is absolutely DELIVERING across El Salvador, building infrastructure, crushing crime, and transforming the country. And this is the love and massive support pouring in from the Salvadoran people! Removing corrupt judges works.

Gunther Eagleman™

39,796 views • 4 months ago

“Half a millimetre away from the crime scene is pretty incriminating”

“Half a millimetre away from the crime scene is pretty incriminating”

I am the cornerstone

2,070,706 views • 11 months ago

the next prince removing the iconic jimmyohm scene in the official trailer should be a CRIME #jimmyohm #thenextprince

the next prince removing the iconic jimmyohm scene in the official trailer should be a CRIME #jimmyohm #thenextprince

bat' 🦇

52,995 views • 1 year ago

This is a scene from a Disney+ kids cartoon called The Proud Family Blatant anti-white propaganda

This is a scene from a Disney+ kids cartoon called The Proud Family Blatant anti-white propaganda

End Wokeness

16,858,790 views • 3 years ago

BREAKING 🚨🚨 #Anaheim / #California Anaheim PD removing a special Vegas fan from the arena this evening

BREAKING 🚨🚨 #Anaheim / #California Anaheim PD removing a special Vegas fan from the arena this evening

OC Scanner 🇺🇸 🇺🇸

66,799 views • 3 months ago

The Massachusetts State Police aren’t incompetent when they don’t want to be. Trooper O’Loughlin discusses the proper use of evidence placards to process a crime scene. This is yet another thing absent in the Karen Read case—probably because the SERT Team was called in to process the scene and NOT the Crime Scene Services Section. This was always a huge red flag in my eyes—the SERT Team is not trained in forensic evidence processing or collection, and does not have any procedures in place for forensic evidence processing. Aside from using evidence placards, they’re not trained in forensic photography, evidence collection or chain of custody, crime scene integrity, among other things. If you don’t think this was a VERY deliberate decision, look no further than the MSP’s own description of the SERT Team’s duties: “…missing person searches, civil disturbances, special event crowd management, site security, or other situations where a cohesive unit of law enforcement officers may be needed.” You’ll be hard pressed to find any other cases where they’re the unit called to process a crime scene and collect evidence in a homicide—I’ve already tried. Most of the examples of cases I could find when the SERT Team was utilized were either missing persons searches, or for crowd management at parades, protests and other large crowd disturbances.

The Massachusetts State Police aren’t incompetent when they don’t want to be. Trooper O’Loughlin discusses the proper use of evidence placards to process a crime scene. This is yet another thing absent in the Karen Read case—probably because the SERT Team was called in to process the scene and NOT the Crime Scene Services Section. This was always a huge red flag in my eyes—the SERT Team is not trained in forensic evidence processing or collection, and does not have any procedures in place for forensic evidence processing. Aside from using evidence placards, they’re not trained in forensic photography, evidence collection or chain of custody, crime scene integrity, among other things. If you don’t think this was a VERY deliberate decision, look no further than the MSP’s own description of the SERT Team’s duties: “…missing person searches, civil disturbances, special event crowd management, site security, or other situations where a cohesive unit of law enforcement officers may be needed.” You’ll be hard pressed to find any other cases where they’re the unit called to process a crime scene and collect evidence in a homicide—I’ve already tried. Most of the examples of cases I could find when the SERT Team was utilized were either missing persons searches, or for crowd management at parades, protests and other large crowd disturbances.

Olivia

11,863 views • 18 days ago

This is a scene from movie called ‘The Believer’ released in 2001. Do you agree with him?

This is a scene from movie called ‘The Believer’ released in 2001. Do you agree with him?

Noah’s Ark 🚢

13,065 views • 26 days ago