正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

This is CRAZY… Moby vs ChatGPT. I asked both: “Help me prepare for BFCM!" → ChatGPT: gave me theory. → Moby: gave me exact steps tied to my Shopify + ad data. ChatGPT said: • “Try new audiences” • “Test creatives” • “Monitor metrics” Moby said: • “Shift %... of budget from Facebook to Google” • “Scale testing → increase spend weekly, not daily” • “Landing page X is down 59% WoW here’s the fix” • “Email automations + win-backs must be dialed before BFCM” The difference? One gives you homework. The other gives you the answers, personalized to your store. Here’s why that matters: Generic AI doesn’t know your blended ROAS, SKU margins, or why CAC spikes in peak season. Moby does because it’s trained on billions of commerce events and plugged into your real-time data. That’s why brands like Underoutfit avoided hiring 5 analysts. Moby is already doing the work. And right now, Triple Whale just launched BFCM Agents that optimize campaigns hour by hour during the biggest shopping week of the year. I’ll be testing Moby’s Google recommendations cautiously (my gut says Meta scales better), but this is exactly why I trust it heading into Q4. Want to build Ecom Agents like this? Try Moby at the link below: And yes, I'm a proud Triple Whale partner. PS: Want my complete BFCM optimization framework that generated these results? Comment "MOBY" and I'll send you the exact playbook.show more

Chris Lang

4,902 subscribers

29,654 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Media buying is changing faster than most people realize. Don't believe me? True Classic runs 100% of their Meta spend through automated media buying in Triple Whale 🐳. Meta is their biggest channel. When a brand hands you their biggest channel, that's the ultimate trust. My wife and I built Madison Braids, and I lived in those ad accounts for years. Media buying is simple in theory, brutal in practice. In theory: find the winners, cut the losers, keep the creative fresh. In practice? You turn into a day trader. Glued to the dashboard, refreshing hourly, combing through spreadsheets, second-guessing every move. And I'll admit the part nobody likes to: some days my mood was dictated by the ROAS in my own account. Numbers up, I'm flying. Numbers down, the whole day goes with it. That's a brutal way to run a business and a worse way to live. More data never fixed it. More dashboards, more "insights"...none of it gave me an hour back. It just gave me more to comb through. That's why we built Moby Automations. You hand Moby the repetitive work and it runs on a schedule, on your live Triple Whale data. And because it's built on frontier LLMs, it keeps getting sharper, reasoning through your data the way a good buyer would, not just following rules. "Check my Meta campaigns every morning and give me actions based on my scaling rules." "Find my fatigued creatives every week and build new variants from what's working." Moby does the work and queues every action for your approval. You stay in control. Your team gets their time back. But here's why I'm actually excited. It's bigger than time saved. This is work that should be done by a machine. Hand it over, and you get back the parts that matter: your focus, your creativity, your humanity. That's the real leverage. The machine watches the data. You go find the next channel, the next opportunity, the next bet that grows the business. That's our play. Moby Automations are live. Go put one to work.

Maxx Blank 🐳

306,002 次观看 • 3 个月前

We tried to record a normal AI launch video for this. And then we realized… The best way to showcase Moby 2 is just to let you have it. Because I genuinely think it’s the best product we’ve ever built at Triple Whale. It’s a DTC operator’s dream — a proactive agent that works for you. It can: - Monitor your ads and improve them - Launch and optimize campaigns - Run your Klaviyo flows - Generate creatives (images + video) The whole reason we founded Triple Whale was simple: 1. Get all your data in one place 2. Give you clarity 3. Help you automate and scale Moby 2 is the first time it really feels like we got there. Next week, we’ll onboard the first cohort of users and then expand as quickly as we can. But I cannot wait to get it in your hands. Request early access now →

We tried to record a normal AI launch video for this. And then we realized… The best way to showcase Moby 2 is just to let you have it. Because I genuinely think it’s the best product we’ve ever built at Triple Whale. It’s a DTC operator’s dream — a proactive agent that works for you. It can: - Monitor your ads and improve them - Launch and optimize campaigns - Run your Klaviyo flows - Generate creatives (images + video) The whole reason we founded Triple Whale was simple: 1. Get all your data in one place 2. Give you clarity 3. Help you automate and scale Moby 2 is the first time it really feels like we got there. Next week, we’ll onboard the first cohort of users and then expand as quickly as we can. But I cannot wait to get it in your hands. Request early access now →

AJ Orbach 🐳

168,805 次观看 • 6 个月前

I'm so confident Triple Whale will make you money that I'm making a bet: If you do over a million dollars/year I'll pay you $250 for 15 minutes of your time. Today we're Introducing the Prime Day Mega Agent, an intelligent Amazon Analyst built to print you money on Prime Day. Here’s what it does, autonomously: – Analyzes Meta, Tiktok and Amazon ad performance – Predicts your winning SKUs using historical trend modeling – Generates a plug-and-play Prime Day playbook: what to pause, scale, test and when + when to send out email campaigns It’s like having a Head of Growth, Media Buying, and Ops in one… Except It works around the clock and leverages more data than any human ever could. We built it because we noticed a critical trend👇 When analyzing Prime Day sales data from last year, we found that the top brands didn’t just edge out the competition, they crushed them. Same tools. Same budgets. Same Prime Day. Yet somehow a small cohort of brands were crushing at a clip we typically don't see... So what were the winners doing that no one else was? We found levers the winners pulled that everyone else missed. Levers like: - Making their PPC target Prime-specific keywords - Warming up email audiences weeks before to build anticipation - Surf-scaling their ads by the hour not by the day on Prime Day Now, you can get that ENTIRE playbook the winners used custom built on your data. This agent is available RIGHT NOW. Go into Moby in Triple Whale and search "Prime Day Mega Agent." If you're a brand doing over a million dollars a year on Amazon, doing Prime Day right isn't a nice to have, it's table stakes. I guarantee you this agent will make you more revenue... And I am putting CASH behind it. If you do over a million/year I'll pay you $250 to take a demo... Limited to the first 100 people to sign up. The link to book is below this tweet. One more thing 🤯 As part of this launch I'm giving away an Amazon Agentic Org Chart the top brands will be using in the next 12 months. It will show you exactly what agents to use and for what, so you can maximize Amazon growth, autonomously. Want it? Retweet and comment "Moby" below and I'll dm you it.

Maxx Blank 🐳

112,800 次观看 • 1 年前

Yesterday I met with a $100M brand completely swamped trying to build AI agents. They were duct taping together N8n, Gumloop, Make, Lindy and Zapier hoping it would help automate. Here’s the thing: Those tools are great but only if your data is clean, connected, and actually usable by AI. For example you can’t build a real media buying agent if it doesn’t know: – What’s in stock – What your customers LTV – How your sales change by season Triple Whale brings all of your data into one place. So when you ask our AI a question, it doesn’t guess because it already has the data. And it knows how to use it. We’ve spent 920 days and hired 72 full-time engineers to build the most advanced data layer in ecom designed for AI from day one. Wallaroo Media figured it out👇 They dropped every other platform for Triple Whale. ❌ No more scattered agents ❌ No more platform-hopping ✅ Better answers, better automations, better results Shout out to Justin Doyle and the whole Wallaroo team for the incredible partnership!

Maxx Blank 🐳

47,007 次观看 • 1 年前

Coinbase CEO Explains “Reverse Prompting” and the Rise of the AI CEO Brian Armstrong: “One of the big pushes we made in the last year was we got our own internal hosted AI model that was connected to all of our data sources, right?” “So it's like every Slack message, every Google doc, Salesforce data, Confluence, you know.” “So now the data is all aggregated and I've started to ask it really… it's not just like prompting it, ‘Hey, can you write this kind of memo for me,’ or something.” “I'm asking these AI agents now, ‘As CEO, what should I be aware of in the company that I might not be aware of?’ And it'll tell me, ‘Did you know that there's actually disagreement on this team about the strategy?’ And I was like, actually, I didn't know that.” “This is like reverse prompting. So instead of telling the AI agent what you want it to do, you ask it what you should be thinking more about.” @jason: “It's a mentor. It's a coach.” Brian: “Yeah. Like, what could make me a better CEO? And it's like, ‘Well, I looked at how you spent your time in the last quarter and here's how you said that you wanted to spend it, but you actually spent 32% of your time on this instead of 20%.’” “I've asked it other questions like, ‘What's the thing that I changed my mind on the most over the last year?’ Things like that.” “It'll prompt you with information you should be thinking about instead of the other way around.” Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: Our episode is sponsored by the New York Stock Exchange - a modern marketplace and exchange for building the future. It all happens at the NYSE 🏛.

Coinbase CEO Explains “Reverse Prompting” and the Rise of the AI CEO Brian Armstrong: “One of the big pushes we made in the last year was we got our own internal hosted AI model that was connected to all of our data sources, right?” “So it's like every Slack message, every Google doc, Salesforce data, Confluence, you know.” “So now the data is all aggregated and I've started to ask it really… it's not just like prompting it, ‘Hey, can you write this kind of memo for me,’ or something.” “I'm asking these AI agents now, ‘As CEO, what should I be aware of in the company that I might not be aware of?’ And it'll tell me, ‘Did you know that there's actually disagreement on this team about the strategy?’ And I was like, actually, I didn't know that.” “This is like reverse prompting. So instead of telling the AI agent what you want it to do, you ask it what you should be thinking more about.” @jason: “It's a mentor. It's a coach.” Brian: “Yeah. Like, what could make me a better CEO? And it's like, ‘Well, I looked at how you spent your time in the last quarter and here's how you said that you wanted to spend it, but you actually spent 32% of your time on this instead of 20%.’” “I've asked it other questions like, ‘What's the thing that I changed my mind on the most over the last year?’ Things like that.” “It'll prompt you with information you should be thinking about instead of the other way around.” Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: Our episode is sponsored by the New York Stock Exchange - a modern marketplace and exchange for building the future. It all happens at the NYSE 🏛.

The All-In Podcast

80,524 次观看 • 8 个月前

AI Overviews are showing up for more and more searches. And when they do, fewer people click. That’s the part everyone is panicking about. Google gives the answer right there, so the user doesn’t always need to visit your site. But SEO is not dead. The game just changed. Because now your job is not only to rank on Google. Your job is to become the source AI trusts enough to recommend. That means showing up in Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and all the other places people are asking questions. This is why tools like Ubersuggest matter even more now. You can use it to see what people are searching for, what questions they’re asking, what competitors rank for, and where your content gaps are. Then you turn that into better answers. Not generic blog posts. Real expertise. Real examples. Clear explanations. Content that both humans and AI can understand, trust, and cite. And your website still matters because that’s where attention turns into action. AI can summarize information. But it does not close the deal for you. It does not build the relationship. It does not replace your proof, your offer, or your brand. So save this action plan.

Neil Patel

10,260 次观看 • 2 个月前

DEEP THOUGHTS from Scott Adams and Naval on Singularity Theory and the nature of consciousness. Naval: I try not to go too much in the supernatural, but I'll be honest, there are times when I've prayed. (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) Scott: Can't hurt! Naval: Nobody's perfect! Yeah, exactly. Pascal's wager, right? Just in case! Scott: Yeah, I've got a version of this. I don't know if I've ever said this out loud before, but every now and then I just talk to the creators of The Simulation that are watching me -- because it might be me . . . . Naval: Yeah, exactly! No, I completely agree. Yes, if simulation hypothesis is true, then, you know, God or creator or master programmer has your best interest at heart. Scott: I say things like, you know: "Is this the plan? I mean, are you really going to do this thing?" Naval: Exactly. Exactly. No, yeah. Like, “don't take me out of the game too fast.” Like, “you need some resource if you want me to be effective, right?” Or like, “I'm not Job. Don't try me. I'll fail.” (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) “Let's not go through. Let's not take that route. Let's try a different one.” Yeah, I think everybody does that. Because at the end of the day, existence itself is an unexplained miracle! Like how did we get here? Why am I here? Why am I a monkey? Why am I three dimensional? Why am I male? Why am I talking to you right now? What does it even mean to talk, right? The whole thing is so surreal that there is an instantaneous and overarching miracle of just consciousness. Like why even be conscious? Why not just be like zombies or robots talking to each other, going through the same actions? Why even be aware? So, there's so much here that you just have to take axiomatically -- and that is spirituality. And I think your spirituality, your current religion, is a Simulation Hypothesis. It's perfectly valid, you know. Mine is probably closer to the Tao and, you know, other people's Christianity or whatever, but somehow, you have to explain this miracle of existence. And everyone has to do it in their own frame. But the rest is science, right? The rest is all -- follows the rules of science. And so, what I don't like is when like someone says: “This one, I'm correct, it's scientific, you should believe it because of these following arguments.” And then I'm like: “Okay, well, what are the implications? How do we test it?” If you want me to believe in the real world, it has to be scientific, which means it has to be testable. There's a third category that I will accept, which is direct experience, but it's only valid for you. So, if you have a direct experience of something, you can hold it, but your ability to convey it is zero, because everybody has their own experience and you can't take anybody else's experience at value. Scott: I'll give you that. I'm gonna give you that my personal experience is so bizarre that -- I mean, it's not, I don't think it's quite Elon Musk level, but I mean, you've got your own life that's kind of, doesn't match. Naval: Yeah, very surreal. Yeah. Scott: I mean, how do the three of us exist? Is this really – like, there's so many things in my life that happened, and I'm sure you have the same feeling, where you just say, how is this real? I mean, just how is this real? Naval: If you want to talk absolute truth, and nothing else, the only statement that you can make that is absolutely true is that – what’s that? Go ahead. Scott: I know where this is going. Naval: Sorry. What's yours? Scott: It's that we exist. To ask the question. That's the only thing you know. Naval: It's actually even worse than that! (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) I used to say it was I exist and then a very smart friend of mine corrected me and he said, no, awareness exists. You don't even know that you exist. Your thought, like yes, your current thought exists and you're aware of that current thought, but what is the you that is having that thought? That's the whole Buddhist question, the whole enlightenment question. Is there a persistent self-identity other than just thoughts that are referring to each other? Like when you look for yourself, you're not actually there. There's an awareness. The awareness exists, but the you separate from that awareness, does that even exist? Full transcript of podcast (excerpt begins at 54:33): Full video:

DEEP THOUGHTS from Scott Adams and Naval on Singularity Theory and the nature of consciousness. Naval: I try not to go too much in the supernatural, but I'll be honest, there are times when I've prayed. (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) Scott: Can't hurt! Naval: Nobody's perfect! Yeah, exactly. Pascal's wager, right? Just in case! Scott: Yeah, I've got a version of this. I don't know if I've ever said this out loud before, but every now and then I just talk to the creators of The Simulation that are watching me -- because it might be me . . . . Naval: Yeah, exactly! No, I completely agree. Yes, if simulation hypothesis is true, then, you know, God or creator or master programmer has your best interest at heart. Scott: I say things like, you know: "Is this the plan? I mean, are you really going to do this thing?" Naval: Exactly. Exactly. No, yeah. Like, “don't take me out of the game too fast.” Like, “you need some resource if you want me to be effective, right?” Or like, “I'm not Job. Don't try me. I'll fail.” (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) “Let's not go through. Let's not take that route. Let's try a different one.” Yeah, I think everybody does that. Because at the end of the day, existence itself is an unexplained miracle! Like how did we get here? Why am I here? Why am I a monkey? Why am I three dimensional? Why am I male? Why am I talking to you right now? What does it even mean to talk, right? The whole thing is so surreal that there is an instantaneous and overarching miracle of just consciousness. Like why even be conscious? Why not just be like zombies or robots talking to each other, going through the same actions? Why even be aware? So, there's so much here that you just have to take axiomatically -- and that is spirituality. And I think your spirituality, your current religion, is a Simulation Hypothesis. It's perfectly valid, you know. Mine is probably closer to the Tao and, you know, other people's Christianity or whatever, but somehow, you have to explain this miracle of existence. And everyone has to do it in their own frame. But the rest is science, right? The rest is all -- follows the rules of science. And so, what I don't like is when like someone says: “This one, I'm correct, it's scientific, you should believe it because of these following arguments.” And then I'm like: “Okay, well, what are the implications? How do we test it?” If you want me to believe in the real world, it has to be scientific, which means it has to be testable. There's a third category that I will accept, which is direct experience, but it's only valid for you. So, if you have a direct experience of something, you can hold it, but your ability to convey it is zero, because everybody has their own experience and you can't take anybody else's experience at value. Scott: I'll give you that. I'm gonna give you that my personal experience is so bizarre that -- I mean, it's not, I don't think it's quite Elon Musk level, but I mean, you've got your own life that's kind of, doesn't match. Naval: Yeah, very surreal. Yeah. Scott: I mean, how do the three of us exist? Is this really – like, there's so many things in my life that happened, and I'm sure you have the same feeling, where you just say, how is this real? I mean, just how is this real? Naval: If you want to talk absolute truth, and nothing else, the only statement that you can make that is absolutely true is that – what’s that? Go ahead. Scott: I know where this is going. Naval: Sorry. What's yours? Scott: It's that we exist. To ask the question. That's the only thing you know. Naval: It's actually even worse than that! (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) I used to say it was I exist and then a very smart friend of mine corrected me and he said, no, awareness exists. You don't even know that you exist. Your thought, like yes, your current thought exists and you're aware of that current thought, but what is the you that is having that thought? That's the whole Buddhist question, the whole enlightenment question. Is there a persistent self-identity other than just thoughts that are referring to each other? Like when you look for yourself, you're not actually there. There's an awareness. The awareness exists, but the you separate from that awareness, does that even exist? Full transcript of podcast (excerpt begins at 54:33): Full video:

ScottAdamsVids

105,025 次观看 • 1 年前

I've been chasing new customers while sitting on $3.2M+ in untapped customer value. And I made a full video tutorial showing exactly how I discovered this Every e-commerce brand does this backwards. We obsess over acquisition costs. We burn budgets on Facebook ads. We chase cold traffic that converts at 2%. Meanwhile, our existing customers - the ones we already paid to acquire - sit there completely underutilized. Here's how bad it gets: → Returning customers: $101 average LTV → New customers: $30 average value → Purchase frequency: 2x higher for existing customers → But 90% of ad spend still goes to acquisition We're ignoring our goldmine to dig for pennies. That's exactly why I decided to test something different. 60 seconds with Moby by Triple Whale changed everything. It instantly showed me: → Cross-selling opportunities I was blind to → Top 15 product SKUs ready for optimization → "Extra hot" product line opportunity → Three high-value segments to target first Now my strategy focuses on -Champions (top spenders), -Loyalists (consistent buyers), and -Potential Loyalists (ready to upgrade). The math is simple: Every $1 optimized from existing customers saves $5 in acquisition costs. Comment “MOBY” and I’ll send you their high-value prompting guide. In partnership with Triple Whale.

Chris Lang

12,373 次观看 • 1 年前

Why is ChatGPT struggling so hard to make a profit? Hundreds of millions of people use it every week. OpenAI is generating massive revenue, and it is still losing billions a year. Here’s what I think is going on. Look at where the real advertising dollars go online. Some of Google’s biggest advertisers are companies like Booking, Expedia, and Amazon. Why? Because when you book a hotel or buy a product, you don’t want one perfect answer. You want options. You want to scroll. Compare prices. See photos. Check reviews. Feel like you made the right decision. That is how people buy. And that is where chat struggles. Ask ChatGPT for the best hotel in Tokyo, and it can give you a smart recommendation. But it doesn’t recreate shopping. It compresses the journey into an answer, when the money is made in the exploration. Even Walmart tested checkout inside ChatGPT, and the early results reportedly converted three times lower than sending people back to Walmart’s own site. The experience was not fast, relevant, or complete enough. So here’s the lesson. The way people interact with your business matters more than most people think. If your customers need to search, compare, scroll, look at options, and make a confident decision, you have to show up in the places where that actually happens. That’s what we help our clients do every day at our ad agency, NP Digital. Because the real money is not just getting attention. It is being in the right place when someone is ready to buy.

Why is ChatGPT struggling so hard to make a profit? Hundreds of millions of people use it every week. OpenAI is generating massive revenue, and it is still losing billions a year. Here’s what I think is going on. Look at where the real advertising dollars go online. Some of Google’s biggest advertisers are companies like Booking, Expedia, and Amazon. Why? Because when you book a hotel or buy a product, you don’t want one perfect answer. You want options. You want to scroll. Compare prices. See photos. Check reviews. Feel like you made the right decision. That is how people buy. And that is where chat struggles. Ask ChatGPT for the best hotel in Tokyo, and it can give you a smart recommendation. But it doesn’t recreate shopping. It compresses the journey into an answer, when the money is made in the exploration. Even Walmart tested checkout inside ChatGPT, and the early results reportedly converted three times lower than sending people back to Walmart’s own site. The experience was not fast, relevant, or complete enough. So here’s the lesson. The way people interact with your business matters more than most people think. If your customers need to search, compare, scroll, look at options, and make a confident decision, you have to show up in the places where that actually happens. That’s what we help our clients do every day at our ad agency, NP Digital. Because the real money is not just getting attention. It is being in the right place when someone is ready to buy.

Neil Patel

10,524 次观看 • 2 个月前

Coinbase CEO, Brian Armstrong: Some great insights on how they are using internally hosted AI Agents. "It’s connected to every Slack message, every Google Doc, and every Salesforce data confluence. Now, this is all linked up and the data is all aggregated, so you can ask these agents questions. Every team is using it—legal, finance, everything. It’s like the "Oracle of Coinbase." I’ve started to ask it things that go beyond just simple prompting, like "Hey, can you write this kind of memo for me?" I’m asking these AI agents now, as CEO, "What should I be aware of in the company that I might not be aware of?" It will tell me, "Did you know that there’s actually disagreement on this team about the strategy?" I realized I didn't know that, but the AI does because it can read every Slack message and every Google Doc. Tobi, who is on my board, calls this "reverse prompting." Instead of telling the AI agent what you want to do, you ask it what you should be thinking more about." --- From The All-In Podcast YT channel (link in comment)

Coinbase CEO, Brian Armstrong: Some great insights on how they are using internally hosted AI Agents. "It’s connected to every Slack message, every Google Doc, and every Salesforce data confluence. Now, this is all linked up and the data is all aggregated, so you can ask these agents questions. Every team is using it—legal, finance, everything. It’s like the "Oracle of Coinbase." I’ve started to ask it things that go beyond just simple prompting, like "Hey, can you write this kind of memo for me?" I’m asking these AI agents now, as CEO, "What should I be aware of in the company that I might not be aware of?" It will tell me, "Did you know that there’s actually disagreement on this team about the strategy?" I realized I didn't know that, but the AI does because it can read every Slack message and every Google Doc. Tobi, who is on my board, calls this "reverse prompting." Instead of telling the AI agent what you want to do, you ask it what you should be thinking more about." --- From The All-In Podcast YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

174,977 次观看 • 6 个月前

Bobby Witt Jr. explains that the pressure to prove you belong can make you abandon the exact habits and identity that earned you the opportunity in the first place “My biggest thing for rookies is, know that you’re a big leaguer. That was the biggest thing for me. You get up here at a young age and can be star struck… There’s this guy, this guy… You can find yourself asking, am I supposed to be here?” “And I just tell them, your talent… The reason why they drafted you… The reason why you’re here… That’s why you’re here. You don’t need to do more. You don’t need to do less.” “But I still, to this day, do that. I want to do more. I want to get to the playoffs. I want to win. I just have to remind myself to know my routine. Know my preparation. Just be Bobby Witt Jr.” “I told one of our rookies when he got called up, just go out there and be Jac. You’re a big leaguer for a reason. Go out there and enjoy it. It could be over like that. Everything you did there got you to this day.” “Keep doing that. Don’t try to do more. Don’t try to do less.”

Bobby Witt Jr. explains that the pressure to prove you belong can make you abandon the exact habits and identity that earned you the opportunity in the first place “My biggest thing for rookies is, know that you’re a big leaguer. That was the biggest thing for me. You get up here at a young age and can be star struck… There’s this guy, this guy… You can find yourself asking, am I supposed to be here?” “And I just tell them, your talent… The reason why they drafted you… The reason why you’re here… That’s why you’re here. You don’t need to do more. You don’t need to do less.” “But I still, to this day, do that. I want to do more. I want to get to the playoffs. I want to win. I just have to remind myself to know my routine. Know my preparation. Just be Bobby Witt Jr.” “I told one of our rookies when he got called up, just go out there and be Jac. You’re a big leaguer for a reason. Go out there and enjoy it. It could be over like that. Everything you did there got you to this day.” “Keep doing that. Don’t try to do more. Don’t try to do less.”

Josh Chambers

22,475 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kim Kardashian admitted on a lie detector test that she uses ChatGPT to prep for her law exams, but the bot often gives wrong answers, which has made her fail tests and afterwards she genuinely takes it to task over it. "Do you consider ChatGPT your friend?" - Teyana Taylor "No. I use it for legal advice. When I need to know the answer to a question, I photograph it, take a picture and upload it in there. "It's made me fail tests constantly. And then I get mad and I scream at it: 'You made me fail! Why did you do that?' And it says back to me: 'This is just teaching you to trust your own instincts. You knew the right answer all along'" "Me and ChatGPT are toxic friends who need to do better, because I'm counting on them to actually help. And she's teaching me a life lesson and then becoming my therapist, explaining why I should believe in myself after they gave the wrong answer. It's a whole ritual at this point. I'm constantly screenshotting it and throwing it in the group chat: 'Can you believe this bitch is talking to me like this? It's insane'"

Kim Kardashian admitted on a lie detector test that she uses ChatGPT to prep for her law exams, but the bot often gives wrong answers, which has made her fail tests and afterwards she genuinely takes it to task over it. "Do you consider ChatGPT your friend?" - Teyana Taylor "No. I use it for legal advice. When I need to know the answer to a question, I photograph it, take a picture and upload it in there. "It's made me fail tests constantly. And then I get mad and I scream at it: 'You made me fail! Why did you do that?' And it says back to me: 'This is just teaching you to trust your own instincts. You knew the right answer all along'" "Me and ChatGPT are toxic friends who need to do better, because I'm counting on them to actually help. And she's teaching me a life lesson and then becoming my therapist, explaining why I should believe in myself after they gave the wrong answer. It's a whole ritual at this point. I'm constantly screenshotting it and throwing it in the group chat: 'Can you believe this bitch is talking to me like this? It's insane'"

Ackerman

1,510,466 次观看 • 1 个月前

.Eric Seufert argues Meta could use AI to own far more of the advertising stack, especially for SMBs that lack the resources to optimize it themselves. "What if you had the go-to AI for managing all ad campaigns within your company? Right now, people use Codex. Codex is not purpose-built for that. They use Claude. Claude is not purpose-built for that. Meta AI now does that. I think that gives you a strong indication of where they want to go with this." "Imagine all the stuff Meta could do if they have access to your landing page. Imagine landing page optimization. Imagine personalization all driven by Meta's own systems." "The advertiser could say, 'I'm an SMB, I don't have the resources to do constant AB testing, constant experimentation on my landing page to optimize conversion. I know if my conversion was better, I'd be able to spend more money on Meta and get more sales.'" "If Meta can offer that to me, I'm okay to surrender that capability to them. Imagine they penetrate even deeper into the customer experience on the website. A lot of SMBs, which is a big bulk of their advertiser base, will say, 'Yes, please do anything you can do to optimize conversion for me, because that's going to result in more revenue for me, which I'm then going to reinvest in more ad spend.'"

.Eric Seufert argues Meta could use AI to own far more of the advertising stack, especially for SMBs that lack the resources to optimize it themselves. "What if you had the go-to AI for managing all ad campaigns within your company? Right now, people use Codex. Codex is not purpose-built for that. They use Claude. Claude is not purpose-built for that. Meta AI now does that. I think that gives you a strong indication of where they want to go with this." "Imagine all the stuff Meta could do if they have access to your landing page. Imagine landing page optimization. Imagine personalization all driven by Meta's own systems." "The advertiser could say, 'I'm an SMB, I don't have the resources to do constant AB testing, constant experimentation on my landing page to optimize conversion. I know if my conversion was better, I'd be able to spend more money on Meta and get more sales.'" "If Meta can offer that to me, I'm okay to surrender that capability to them. Imagine they penetrate even deeper into the customer experience on the website. A lot of SMBs, which is a big bulk of their advertiser base, will say, 'Yes, please do anything you can do to optimize conversion for me, because that's going to result in more revenue for me, which I'm then going to reinvest in more ad spend.'"

TBPN

30,332 次观看 • 25 天前

Satya Nadella said the quiet part about the entire AI industry out loud: for the first time you are buying a technology where the data your own use generates may not belong to you "it's like if I sold you a database and said the data you put into your database is not yours and it's mine, and it goes away if I took away the license. "How would you like that?" this is him explaining why he thinks the model layer taking all the royalty cannot last, the one test he tells enterprises to run before they trust any model, and the new kind of insider risk he says nobody is building for "it may fake my books" "we should avoid these cozy arrangements of who is testing what" bookmark & watch it - then read the article below ↓

Satya Nadella said the quiet part about the entire AI industry out loud: for the first time you are buying a technology where the data your own use generates may not belong to you "it's like if I sold you a database and said the data you put into your database is not yours and it's mine, and it goes away if I took away the license. "How would you like that?" this is him explaining why he thinks the model layer taking all the royalty cannot last, the one test he tells enterprises to run before they trust any model, and the new kind of insider risk he says nobody is building for "it may fake my books" "we should avoid these cozy arrangements of who is testing what" bookmark & watch it - then read the article below ↓

Сarm1ne

41,297 次观看 • 18 天前

WOAH 🚨 American posted a video of her daughter sitting in the car. META then put a prompt on the video saying “Who’s the child passenger” for people to click on, then gave personal info AND HOME LOCATION “Why in the hell is that even a suggested question about a minor? But I clicked it, and this is where I started getting really uncomfortable: It starts pulling completely separate information for each of my kids, their names, birth information, pictures and videos of them. It pulled a newborn picture from my mom's page from years ago, and then it pulled this. I deleted this picture years ago” Here’s where it gets extremely shocking “And then Facebook suggests that I ask Meta AI, "Where does Kaylie Robbins live?" Are you kidding me? — then it says, "I'm pointing Kaylie Robbins' location." It pieced together my information to show people where I live” It looks like this is META’s AI that is doing this. When it gives these messages on people’s videos and photos to “learn more” about something, it’s to help people get more information about topics or posts that interest them But unfortunately, it’s what’s in the photo so if it’s a child that’s what the AI is looking for more information on. Apparently META is fixing this issue…. Here’s how to make sure this doesn’t happen to you on META - Lock down audience on old albums, not just new posts, make private if possible - Public + “friends of friends” is what these systems treat as available to use for AI - Ask relatives to untag and unshare kids. You have to do this because copies on their pages stay in the available information for the Ai to pull from - Turn off camera roll, cloud processing, sharing suggestions in Facebook settings and restrict the Facebook app’s photo access on the phone to selected photos only (You have to do this because Facebook is testing AI features that pull from your phone camera roll) Meta says they’re patching this specific prompt style, but that doesn’t mean the underlying ability to answer “who is this child and where does this person live” from public history is gone When you delete something it isn’t really done and can still be used by META’s artificial intelligence A photo you deleted from your timeline can still exist on someone else’s album, share or download, it can also be in Meta’s backup window after deletion Relatives tagging or posting kids is a separate data source you don’t control. This can be accessed by the AI to pull data on your child. The woman explicitly said that’s how some of the old newborn and family information was sourced and provided to anyone who clicked the link One of the craziest parts about this that people NEED to be aware of is this part ‘Meta has also been testing camera-roll and cloud-processing suggestions that analyze unpublished photos if you opt in’ This means photos and videos on your cloud or camera roll that haven’t been posted... META can treat these items as a data source, even though you never posted the photo or video…. Insanity

WOAH 🚨 American posted a video of her daughter sitting in the car. META then put a prompt on the video saying “Who’s the child passenger” for people to click on, then gave personal info AND HOME LOCATION “Why in the hell is that even a suggested question about a minor? But I clicked it, and this is where I started getting really uncomfortable: It starts pulling completely separate information for each of my kids, their names, birth information, pictures and videos of them. It pulled a newborn picture from my mom's page from years ago, and then it pulled this. I deleted this picture years ago” Here’s where it gets extremely shocking “And then Facebook suggests that I ask Meta AI, "Where does Kaylie Robbins live?" Are you kidding me? — then it says, "I'm pointing Kaylie Robbins' location." It pieced together my information to show people where I live” It looks like this is META’s AI that is doing this. When it gives these messages on people’s videos and photos to “learn more” about something, it’s to help people get more information about topics or posts that interest them But unfortunately, it’s what’s in the photo so if it’s a child that’s what the AI is looking for more information on. Apparently META is fixing this issue…. Here’s how to make sure this doesn’t happen to you on META - Lock down audience on old albums, not just new posts, make private if possible - Public + “friends of friends” is what these systems treat as available to use for AI - Ask relatives to untag and unshare kids. You have to do this because copies on their pages stay in the available information for the Ai to pull from - Turn off camera roll, cloud processing, sharing suggestions in Facebook settings and restrict the Facebook app’s photo access on the phone to selected photos only (You have to do this because Facebook is testing AI features that pull from your phone camera roll) Meta says they’re patching this specific prompt style, but that doesn’t mean the underlying ability to answer “who is this child and where does this person live” from public history is gone When you delete something it isn’t really done and can still be used by META’s artificial intelligence A photo you deleted from your timeline can still exist on someone else’s album, share or download, it can also be in Meta’s backup window after deletion Relatives tagging or posting kids is a separate data source you don’t control. This can be accessed by the AI to pull data on your child. The woman explicitly said that’s how some of the old newborn and family information was sourced and provided to anyone who clicked the link One of the craziest parts about this that people NEED to be aware of is this part ‘Meta has also been testing camera-roll and cloud-processing suggestions that analyze unpublished photos if you opt in’ This means photos and videos on your cloud or camera roll that haven’t been posted... META can treat these items as a data source, even though you never posted the photo or video…. Insanity

Wall Street Apes

170,979 次观看 • 24 天前

I recommend that you watch the video first before reading. I will try my best to get you to believe that this is a life or death situation. Because it really is. Also I would like to remove any misconceptions and confusion. It does no one any good if my point is missed. Not me, not you. It is the thing I love most about prayer. So first of all, prayer is not an excuse to do nothing, hence my biggest issues when our respected men of God tell us just to pray. Look, when you pray for God’s protection in the morning, you don’t get out on the mainroad and jump in front of a moving car. No, you’d have to get to work by driving carefully. That is how you get the complete answer to your prayer. Second of all, I am not your typical anything, when you feel you have figured me out, reserve a little space in your mind for surprises (they are usually not bad ones). However you can always bank on that I will stand for Righteousness, Justice, Truth, Equity and Fairness So here goes, legislation that’s what I love about prayer. An exercise where precedences can be birth. There are different types of changes such as the swapping between two already existent things/experiences. However the biggest type of change is the one where the seen or usual or existent gives room for the never-seen-before or unusual or non-existent. This is what it means to set precedence. The making of Firsts. People who are spiritually deep know that, for something to achieve “being” then it didn’t exist before. And if “it” didn’t exist before, it meant there are existing protocols/workings/laws/principles ensuring “It” never be (comes into existence). So if “It” must be, then you may have to legislate a new Law/Act to make “It” be (come into existence) first in the spiritual and then watch out for its manifestation in the physical. The movie is an account of events that actually happened. This is a true life story. Not fiction, this is what makes the wisdom therein even more intense. This is why I speak in tongues, how else am I going to have access to the secret archives of spiritual information for which to build my case on. This is why Paul says the conversation is not with man but with God “howbeit he speaketh mysteries” 1Cor14:2. This is why God encourages you to present your strong reasons. “...let us plead and argue together. Set forth your case that you may be justified (proved right)". Why should you enact a new protocol? Why should a new Act be raised for you? Why should you have a one-in-town kind of favour/grace/unction/reach/influence/help/vision/sight/run/strength? Whatever the new thing you want is, what if it is a matter of life and death. This is what I meant at the beginning of this post. What if you want to start generational wealth for your progeny. FIRSTS a.k.a NEW THINGS usually either have to be birthed or be legislated. I will/may speak on birthing in another post. The point here is God is a Judge too, you can get him to rule in your favor, you just have to have done your research. Especially when your matter requires dealing with your Antecedents. (No matter how much she tried and wanted it your Mother couldn’t get pregnant until she was forty-five why should you have a child in your twenties? Because you simply want it?). It’s just that you are not (re)searching physical things, sometimes you are searching on spiritual protocols that predates Adam. That’s why Psalms40:7 says “Then said I, Behold, I come; in the volume of the book as it is written for me: Yes, really, or why do you think the Bible says “…for the [Holy] Spirit searches diligently, exploring and examining everything, even sounding the profound and bottomless things of God [the divine counsels and things hidden (and) beyond man’s scrutiny]” 1Cor2:10. Praying in tongues is a multifaceted multidimensional exercise. The Spirit of God is helping your spirit research, discern, articulate accurately and speak.

I recommend that you watch the video first before reading. I will try my best to get you to believe that this is a life or death situation. Because it really is. Also I would like to remove any misconceptions and confusion. It does no one any good if my point is missed. Not me, not you. It is the thing I love most about prayer. So first of all, prayer is not an excuse to do nothing, hence my biggest issues when our respected men of God tell us just to pray. Look, when you pray for God’s protection in the morning, you don’t get out on the mainroad and jump in front of a moving car. No, you’d have to get to work by driving carefully. That is how you get the complete answer to your prayer. Second of all, I am not your typical anything, when you feel you have figured me out, reserve a little space in your mind for surprises (they are usually not bad ones). However you can always bank on that I will stand for Righteousness, Justice, Truth, Equity and Fairness So here goes, legislation that’s what I love about prayer. An exercise where precedences can be birth. There are different types of changes such as the swapping between two already existent things/experiences. However the biggest type of change is the one where the seen or usual or existent gives room for the never-seen-before or unusual or non-existent. This is what it means to set precedence. The making of Firsts. People who are spiritually deep know that, for something to achieve “being” then it didn’t exist before. And if “it” didn’t exist before, it meant there are existing protocols/workings/laws/principles ensuring “It” never be (comes into existence). So if “It” must be, then you may have to legislate a new Law/Act to make “It” be (come into existence) first in the spiritual and then watch out for its manifestation in the physical. The movie is an account of events that actually happened. This is a true life story. Not fiction, this is what makes the wisdom therein even more intense. This is why I speak in tongues, how else am I going to have access to the secret archives of spiritual information for which to build my case on. This is why Paul says the conversation is not with man but with God “howbeit he speaketh mysteries” 1Cor14:2. This is why God encourages you to present your strong reasons. “...let us plead and argue together. Set forth your case that you may be justified (proved right)". Why should you enact a new protocol? Why should a new Act be raised for you? Why should you have a one-in-town kind of favour/grace/unction/reach/influence/help/vision/sight/run/strength? Whatever the new thing you want is, what if it is a matter of life and death. This is what I meant at the beginning of this post. What if you want to start generational wealth for your progeny. FIRSTS a.k.a NEW THINGS usually either have to be birthed or be legislated. I will/may speak on birthing in another post. The point here is God is a Judge too, you can get him to rule in your favor, you just have to have done your research. Especially when your matter requires dealing with your Antecedents. (No matter how much she tried and wanted it your Mother couldn’t get pregnant until she was forty-five why should you have a child in your twenties? Because you simply want it?). It’s just that you are not (re)searching physical things, sometimes you are searching on spiritual protocols that predates Adam. That’s why Psalms40:7 says “Then said I, Behold, I come; in the volume of the book as it is written for me: Yes, really, or why do you think the Bible says “…for the [Holy] Spirit searches diligently, exploring and examining everything, even sounding the profound and bottomless things of God [the divine counsels and things hidden (and) beyond man’s scrutiny]” 1Cor2:10. Praying in tongues is a multifaceted multidimensional exercise. The Spirit of God is helping your spirit research, discern, articulate accurately and speak.

Dr Ayo

269,024 次观看 • 2 年前

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book Scary Smart now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,882 次观看 • 4 个月前

Therapist Trey Tucker came on Relatable to talk about anxiety. I asked him, "If you could define anxiety, how would you define it?" Tucker: "Fear of the future. Fear of the unknown. The verse, 'Be still and know that I am God' used to make me so angry. I'm like, God, what do you mean be still? Like, I got a real problem here. I'm in a storm. Why do you want me to just be still? And what I realized is that the word, and I believe it's "Rapha" in the Hebrew, it doesn’t mean just ‘don’t move.’ It means ‘release your grip.’ The idea that I thought that I had control, that was a lie anyway. If I can start to realize like, yes, the circumstances might happen that are negative or I might be in the middle of a battle right now, but if I can loosen my grip and stop white knuckling it, then I can realize that like oh—God is God, not me, and He’s going to take care of me no matter what happens. That really is the solution to anxiety. It’s not changing your circumstances or slapping meds on it.”

Therapist Trey Tucker came on Relatable to talk about anxiety. I asked him, "If you could define anxiety, how would you define it?" Tucker: "Fear of the future. Fear of the unknown. The verse, 'Be still and know that I am God' used to make me so angry. I'm like, God, what do you mean be still? Like, I got a real problem here. I'm in a storm. Why do you want me to just be still? And what I realized is that the word, and I believe it's "Rapha" in the Hebrew, it doesn’t mean just ‘don’t move.’ It means ‘release your grip.’ The idea that I thought that I had control, that was a lie anyway. If I can start to realize like, yes, the circumstances might happen that are negative or I might be in the middle of a battle right now, but if I can loosen my grip and stop white knuckling it, then I can realize that like oh—God is God, not me, and He’s going to take care of me no matter what happens. That really is the solution to anxiety. It’s not changing your circumstances or slapping meds on it.”

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey

47,367 次观看 • 5 个月前

Real life story time! I briefly dated someone who saw flowers as a complete waste of his money. And refused to buy them. Like ever. REFUSED. Even on “special occasions”. And it was exhausting trying to explain why I liked flowers and why it made me feel special for my significant other to get them for me. Eventually I got tired of asking for that display of romance. And I left. I walked away and didn’t wait for him to break up with me. Sometimes, in the quest for better, you have to be the one to walk away. But that’s not the point of this post. The point is: that one hated the idea, and the right one was honored by the idea. I’m now married to the man who has a whole BUDGET JUST FOR FLOWERS for me set aside and he carefully chooses ones he believes I will like. A whole budget. Please catch what I’m saying. Maybe it’s not flowers. Maybe it’s quality time. Maybe it’s something else. The point is the one who WANTS TO, will. Basically… One man’s “why do you need all that from me” is another man’s “is that all you need from me?” Remember that. And stop settling my good sis. The things you would like to have only scare those who have intentions of doing the bare minimum to skate by. That means there’s a heart out there willing to put in the work Carry on as you were. 💖☺️ Save this for later when you need the reminder.

Real life story time! I briefly dated someone who saw flowers as a complete waste of his money. And refused to buy them. Like ever. REFUSED. Even on “special occasions”. And it was exhausting trying to explain why I liked flowers and why it made me feel special for my significant other to get them for me. Eventually I got tired of asking for that display of romance. And I left. I walked away and didn’t wait for him to break up with me. Sometimes, in the quest for better, you have to be the one to walk away. But that’s not the point of this post. The point is: that one hated the idea, and the right one was honored by the idea. I’m now married to the man who has a whole BUDGET JUST FOR FLOWERS for me set aside and he carefully chooses ones he believes I will like. A whole budget. Please catch what I’m saying. Maybe it’s not flowers. Maybe it’s quality time. Maybe it’s something else. The point is the one who WANTS TO, will. Basically… One man’s “why do you need all that from me” is another man’s “is that all you need from me?” Remember that. And stop settling my good sis. The things you would like to have only scare those who have intentions of doing the bare minimum to skate by. That means there’s a heart out there willing to put in the work Carry on as you were. 💖☺️ Save this for later when you need the reminder.

Adara Sherron, M.A.

1,862,291 次观看 • 3 年前