Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
This is DEEP Revelation!👀 Ignorance is not allowed here😭
28,025 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)
13 Comments

Absolutely vile! Islam needs to be banned from the world!

From 6 to 9, Muhammad trained her baby-wife to play with his tiny "doll".

This is so disgusting.. Why would do that ?? Your emotional performance is impressive. Your consistency, however, is nonexistent. Let's begin with what the Quran actually says, rather than what you want your audience to believe it says. Yes, Quran 65:4 mentions women who have not menstruated, and classical Muslim scholars understood this to include girls who had not yet reached puberty. We have no reason to hide that. But here's what you're deliberately leaving out. The verse establishes a legal waiting period in cases of divorce. It addresses a marital situation that already existed in society. It does not command Muslims to marry young girls, encourage them to do so, or give men unrestricted permission to harm children. Classical Islamic jurists distinguished between the marriage contract and consummation. Menstruation was not their sole criterion. They discussed whether the female was physically capable of intercourse without suffering harm, and prohibited intercourse where she could not bear it or would be injured. That historical standard is not the same as modern medical, psychological, and legal safeguards. Practices involving children that were accepted in some earlier societies are unacceptable in our society today. Neither historical precedent nor a claim of physical capacity alone is sufficient to justify exposing a child to harm. Now let's discuss the historical context you conveniently ignored. Early marriages were not some peculiar invention of Islam or Prophet Muhammad. They existed in other civilizations, including Christian Europe, centuries after the Prophet. Consider Margaret Beaufort, mother of King Henry VII of England. She married Edmund Tudor at approximately twelve years old, became pregnant, and gave birth at thirteen. And this was not merely a marriage contract. The marriage was consummated, and she actually gave birth. Her story is documented in British historical records. Now consider medieval Christian canon law, which recognized twelve as the minimum marriage age for girls and fourteen for boys. Even the Catholic Church's 1983 Code of Canon Law, Canon 1083, sets fourteen for females and sixteen for males as minimum ages for canonical validity, although higher church requirements and civil laws also apply. These are historical facts, not Islamic interpretations. Does this make every historical practice morally acceptable today? Of course not. But it demonstrates something you deliberately concealed: societies operated under very different marriage customs and legal standards throughout history, including Christian societies. So why do you pretend that seventh-century Arabia existed in isolation from the rest of human history? If you want a serious discussion about marriage, historical norms, and the protection of children, let's have one. But if you insist on judging historical Muslim society while refusing to examine the historical practices of Christian Europe, then you're not applying a consistent moral standard. You're practicing selective historical outrage. And that is not scholarship. It is polemics disguised as moral superiority.

His God roped Mary at the age 9 to give Jesus without Marriage.. 😁

Tell them about stories where his child bride Aisha narrates having to clean the prophet's jizz of his robes.

Was there dolls then ?

mus

@grok can you give me the hadith or surah he's talking about, concerning divorce with young as a meme

@overlistener ..facts. 100% facts. En jij hebt kinderen. Gatver.

"But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry." — 1 Corinthians 7:36 (KJV)

#millstoneneck

Amen

SMH 🤦♂️
