Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This is exactly why YOU MUST GET A COLD STORAGE WALLET! 🥶 Learn from this horror story! I was contacted 1 hour ago by someone who was hacked and lost all their XRP TODAY, a total of 18,774 XRP valued at approximately $44,121. His Coinbase 🛡️ balance is now...

58,406 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Ross Morgan's profile picture
Ross Morgan1 year ago

I hope this story helps you protect your crypto. I’ll repost my recommended cold wallet since I know I’m going to get the question. I just hope he recovers his funds and all of you protect your hard earned wealth.

Beverly Bonnie's profile picture
Beverly Bonnie1 year ago

@coinbase He says his Trust wallet was hacked- what’s it connected to Coinbase? I don’t understand.

🇺🇲Smokingthetruth420💨's profile picture
🇺🇲Smokingthetruth420💨1 year ago

@coinbase I looked into that app you talked about a few days ago called Trust Wallet. They don't have an option to transfer my xrp over to there from

Crovax88 🏴‍☠️ 🐦‍🔥's profile picture
Crovax88 🏴‍☠️ 🐦‍🔥1 year ago

@coinbase Coinbase account and Trust wallet are 2 different accounts. I can understand Coinbase being a security issue because it's an exchange But Trust wallet?? Either they stole it or they gave up their keys or passwords.

Ross Morgan's profile picture
Ross Morgan1 year ago

@coinbase Trust is a hot wallet, very hackable.

Dyanna🌟Starr✝️🙏☮️MAGA's profile picture
Dyanna🌟Starr✝️🙏☮️MAGA1 year ago

@coinbase I had 800 xrp stolen in February by a hacker. Be very careful everyone!!

Shelly L Benham's profile picture
Shelly L Benham1 year ago

@coinbase 🚨BEWARE OF $CAMMER$ CLAIMING THEY CAN RECOVER!

Ross Morgan's profile picture
Ross Morgan1 year ago

@coinbase 🎯

Ross Morgan's profile picture
Ross Morgan1 year ago

rn4NgoLZJcpfrSLEVLUGCMoxbnkAoeHhxN Here is the wallet that the funds were sent to. If anyone else gets hacked, check this. You can check the transactions yourself on if you’re interested.

Mountainguy's profile picture
Mountainguy1 year ago

@coinbase Let me ask if u buy xrp on Coinbase and then transfer to a cold storage wallet is there a way they can hack ir cold storage wallet during a transfer? What is a safer alternative then to buying on Coinbase? Or just buy and transfer Hope that makes sense

Related Videos

Mufti Saif al-'Asri on the fatwa by some Hanafis that allows interest (riba) based transactions in non-Muslim lands. People are using this opinion to claim that Muslims taking out interest-based mortgages is permissible. Question: Is it permissible to conduct interest (riba) based transactions in Western countries? Mufti Saif al-'Asri: This question is very important, especially if the intention of this Muslim, who lives in a Muslim country, is to introduce them to Islam and its way of life, and to be an exemplary person that people imitate. So, if when he comes to a non-Muslim country, he says: "There's an opinion that the Hanafis have which considers it permissible to conduct otherwise impermissible transactions in non-Muslim lands. So, it's permissible for me to sell pigs to them and it's permissible for me to engage in interest (riba) based transactions with them. Some Hanafis make the condition that he is the one receiving the interest and not giving it, meaning he's the one receiving the benefits (of the interest based transaction) and he's not benefiting the one he's conducting a transaction with, and so forth. This is an opinion, an opinion that exists. We can't wipe away this jurisprudential opinion. And it has its evidence. However, the vast majority of scholars, and it's even an opinion within the Hanafi school itself, are of the view that it is haram for a Muslim to conduct an impermissible transaction with a non-Muslim. It is not permissible for him (a Muslim) to conduct an interest based transaction with him (Non-Muslim), nor is it permissible to sell or buy alcohol from him, nor is it permissible to sell him pork, and so on and so forth. None of that is permissible. And this opinion is the opinion of the vast majority of scholars. It's the opinion that allows you as a Muslim to be proud of your religion in front of others. It allows you to proudly showcase the distinguishing features of Islam and take honor in the religion that you ascribe to. On the other hand, if you're going to take legal dispensations and conduct transactions based on these things, how are you going to be a caller to this religion? Through your character? The way you speak? Your actions? How? How are people going to look at you? If they say: "Islam prohibits pork; however, masha'Allah, this Muslim at the store sells pork." I mean, what will make you different from other people? A Muslim must not conduct impermissible transactions, whether it's interest or other than it in Western countries.

Akbar Zab

88,566 views • 2 years ago

lets go over a recent transaction with friends at the Waffle House restaurant using MetaMask 🦊 Card; the total of the transaction in fiat was $156 for Waffle House but to you the onchain tx was $152.12 how tf is this possible? the card is tied to an EOA (aka your self custody onchain wallet) which sent a total of 152.123292 $USDC with a 0.006337 $USDC gas fee included there is a 5.409249 $USDC credit applied since you earn rewards when using the card from previous purchases that you can claim or use against said transactions the total cost to the user onchain for this $156 transaction was $152.12 if you were to remove the credit the total cost was $157.53 for a $156 transaction that allowed near instant finality without dealing with on/off ramps, rails/banks & their associated wait times/higher fees $1.53 on this $157.53 transaction is a .97% overall fee which is subsidized by 1% to 3% crypto back, therefore at settlement there are no fees realized & you even earn a little kickback instead MetaMask 🦊 Linea.eth Consensys.eth has been working with Baanx Mastercard to change the space for users who want to access their crypto IRL while getting the benefits of holding a credit card/savings account which is really your own self custody wallet onchain "debit" with access to 90 million merchants globally because you as a user are using your own onchain wallet to interface with the card, you are paying in crypto & are provided with an onchain transaction hash to outline the details each time KYC to use the card is required since there needs to be a tie back for proof of humanity/sybil resistance/refunds/failed purchases, yet, you can spin up a fresh undoxxed wallet, there is no credit check, MetaMask does not have access, does not need & does not want to hold any of your information submitted during the sign up process & if any issuer requests more documentation or closes your account you are still your own self custody wallet onchain therefore you are not affected unlike centralized exchanges or other crypto cards or banks that lock you out of your crypto with minimal options the MetaMask Card is not a top up crypto card, it is not a centralized exchange card, it is not a prepaid card, nor is it a credit card; it is a new way to use your onchain crypto instantly anywhere you can use your traditional debit/credit card so, for example, my company pays me in crypto to my own self custody wallet onchain, my wallet is connected to the MetaMask Card as an instant web2/web3 bridge so that i can use my crypto to pay for things, therefore i do not need a traditional bank account + i get rewards + instant access to my funds any time i want without having to touch traditional systems at all THE ULTIMATE WIN 🦊 start using the virtual card now in your Apple/Google Pay or sign up for the waitlist at - there are currently 27 countries supported with UAE/Dubai, Canada, multiple regions in Africa coming by end of Q3 as we are working on full global adoption by EOY listen to the MetaMask Card 🦊 EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW! space for deeper overviews with myself & Danieljosep.eth ⬇️ got fud? drop your comment below & i will address it! always remember to DYOR from legitimate sources outlined as there are many false claims regarding the MetaMask Card on the timeline from people who have never used it or are just speculating or trolling since they did not read or listen to any of the resources or information that is available to them ARE YOU READY? LFG 🦾

MichaelK.eth

214,950 views • 1 year ago

🚨IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT FROM $ARMY 🚨 Let me tell you something. Yes, it's true. We reached 100M market cap a month ago, and now we're trying to make an important floor from which to bounce. Two months ago, we were barely at 1M market cap. The important thing about an asset is not how it behaves in the upswings, but its strength in the downswings. Our story is the story of $XRP. It's a story of redemption, of struggle, of feeling, of hard work. We've come a long way because of who we are, because of what we like to do, because of the toughness of the XRP $ARMY We will continue to work hard, day after day, just like Ripple has fought against the SEC for 7 years. We are XRP holders with diamond hands, accustomed to rowing when there's a storm. We are the XRP $ARMY, the token that represents the movement of XRP holders. Do you like XRP? This is your home. This is your place. We work to achieve greatness. A wise man once said that an asset shows its strength after recovering from several -80%. Every recovery that is made is another sign of strength. We have a listing on a Top 10 CEX on the way. It is almost time to launch it, right now during these holidays it is difficult to speed it up but everything is agreed: $ARMY will be listed on a top 10 exchange. And not only that, but we have many things prepared. If you like XRP, I highly recommend that you watch the attached video with sound. This is us. This is our fight. This is, definitely, your fight. We are not going to give up. We are not going to fall. The community is EVERYTHING, and there is nothing stronger than the XRP ARMY The golden age of XRP begins. We shall prevail. And by the way, we are delighted that there are token brothers who are bringing attention to XRP. Together we are stronger.

$ARMY

20,940 views • 1 year ago

An interesting thought I had on my morning walk. Filters on their own are not effective to censor all spam from motivated attackers, that's true. But filters do make spam more prone to censorship at the mining pool level. Miners can get away with mining transactions that are used for illegal purposes because they have plausible deniability: they don't know what they are used for, they are "just including what's relayed" by the p2p network. But with many forms of spam, such as OP_RETURN, it is not so. They do not have plausible deniability. MARA is perfectly happy inscribing NFTs and non-standard troll OP_RETURNS via its slipstream service. Since they are legally low risk, it makes sense for them to profit from it. However, if I was to submit something really nasty like torrent links to child pornography (or child porn jpegs) or Mein Kampf (illegal in many countries) MARA could not plausibly deny that it is publishing and distributing illegal content. It’s right there in the OP_RETURN for everyone to see. Consequently they would probably not allow it. If they did, they would get in trouble. And it would be much easier for the content submitters to get caught. If nonstandard node relay software (i.e. libre relay) started being abused by pedophiles, its likely mining pools would just ban these types of higher-risk peers. Of course the pedophiles can always run their own mining pools and get a few transactions every month: bitcoin would remain censorship resistant if you are patient enough. But now, with relaxation of standardness rules and “filters” anybody can easily publish blatantly illegal content as OP_RETURNS and get it relayed to a mining pool in a more censorship-resistant way, cheaper and more effective. Good? Bad? It's possible mining pools are going to have no choice but to develop software that analyzes transaction OP_RETURN to assess what they will publish or not. They may develop content moderation policies, because the illegality of the OP_RETURN content will be blatant and they will have no plausible deniability. I'm honestly pleasantly surprised that miners haven't already done this for obviously "higher risk" transactions like coinjoin. However coinjoin transactions are not illegal per se, and there is very wide international support for financial privacy. Not so for child porn. Once miners start developing software to moderate what transactions go in the blockchain, a Pandora's box is opened: if you can easily filter transactions that have illegal data in the OP_RETURN, why are you allowing whirlpool tx0? Why are you allowing coinjoins? Why are you allowing sanctioned addresses? Ironically, the attempt at making spam transactions less prone to censorship might make economic transactions more prone to censorship. Bitcoin is censorship resistant from a network perspective because anybody can mine anonymously. This censorship resistance is compounded when large centralized mining pools and mining farms have plausible deniability that the transactions they mine aren't blatantly illegal because they are anonymous (“there is no way to know”). The more mining is centralized, the more this component of censorship resistance matters. Non-monetary content puts that aspect at risk. I'm not sure I’m right, but I don't think this idea has been widely discussed. The only thing that can prevent certain txs formats (i.e. the low hanging fruit spam vectors like OP_RETURN) from making it into the chain is consensus rules. Yes I'm aware spammers will always find a way to get spam in eventually. It would be sad to see fork-level consensus to ban OP_RETURN entirely, because there are reasonable harm-reducing use cases for it (e.g. open timestamps). We are nowhere near consensus on restriction spam vectors at a consensus level, not even close. But who knows after 10 years of child porn being distributed via the Bitcoin network nodes and miners both will have had enough. It would be interesting to watch this play out.

FRANCIS - BULLBITCOIN.COM

18,041 views • 10 months ago