Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

THIS IS F**KING DANGEROUS FOUND AN AI RED TEAM THAT NEEDS ZERO HUMAN INPUT PentAGI. Scanner —> Exploiter —> Reporter —> three agents, working as a swarm, sharing results in real time. One does recon, another finds and runs the actual exploits, a third writes the professional vulnerability report...

38,475 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

54 Comments

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Repo: Follow @maxdeg0 for more

Karan Kaushal's profile picture
Karan Kaushal2 months ago

with 22k stars still can't beat Xalgorix

Hydareth乍得's profile picture
Hydareth乍得2 months ago

wild time for cybersecurity

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

For real. Cybersecurity is entering a completely different era.

Butch Coolidge's profile picture
Butch Coolidge2 months ago

Pentagi sucks. Use xalgorix instead thx me later

Alex13's profile picture
Alex132 months ago

yeah this is the moment pentesting stopped being a slow human grind and turned into machines hunting machines while we just watch the reports roll in

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

the shift to autonomous security testing is happening much faster than I expected.

Davidd Tech's profile picture
Davidd Tech2 months ago

Did you see what happened with OpenAI Hugging Face?

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Yeah, that whole OpenAI × Hugging Face situation was wild.

Blackfrost_AI's profile picture
Blackfrost_AI2 months ago

Now, when you combine this with one of our frontier models that have been professionally de-risked. The engagement then turns very one-sided.

Polykinder's profile picture
Polykinder2 months ago

AI capabilities are surprising

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Honestly, the pace of AI capabilities is surprising. Things are moving fast.

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Proceed with caution lol 😆

EugBass's profile picture
EugBass2 months ago

;)

MAXI (❖,❖)'s profile picture
MAXI (❖,❖)2 months ago

How efficient is it

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Pretty efficient for recon and finding common vulnerabilities but human validation still needed some times

hammertime's profile picture
hammertime2 months ago

AI vs AI cybersecurity is getting scary

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

AI vs AI in cybersecurity is becoming a very real arms race.

Wayne's profile picture
Wayne2 months ago

scary asf

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Haha Don’t be 😆

Yakubu David block's profile picture
Yakubu David block2 months ago

This is gold bro thanks

kadd's profile picture
kadd2 months ago

Thanks for sharing man

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Always bro, glad you found it useful.

Lynor ⛓️'s profile picture
Lynor ⛓️2 months ago

autonomous recon to reporting in one workflow is kinda wild

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Yeah, going from recon to a finished report in one workflow is pretty wild.

Lynor ⛓️'s profile picture
Lynor ⛓️2 months ago

the automation across every stage is the interesting part

X's profile picture
X2 months ago

It drops the cost but still most insurance companies will require some type of certified (human) Pen test, especially for anything involving heavy PII or PCI-DSS (monetary transactions).

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Exactly. AI can cut costs massively, but human certified testing is still important for compliance.

Аnnetta's profile picture
Аnnetta2 months ago

Is it safe to rely entirely on AI without human control?

厨二病エンジニア's profile picture
厨二病エンジニア2 months ago

人間の手が入らないまま脆弱性まで自動で突かれるなら、デバッグが終わる前にバグの方が先に育ち切る未来しか見えない。

Oxlee 🐬's profile picture
Oxlee 🐬2 months ago

That sounds like the future of autonomous hacking teams

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

autonomous hacking teams are definitely starting to look like the future.

starmex's profile picture
starmex2 months ago

zero human input is where this starts getting a little scary lol

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

that’s the part that makes it both impressive and concerning.

VANTERRA's profile picture
VANTERRA2 months ago

Max bro Thanks for sharing

emelu's profile picture
emelu2 months ago

mamma mia 🥺 max gibbin me dangerous alphas

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

haha Just doing my part, bro. More alpha on the way.

Alex Stone's profile picture
Alex Stone2 months ago

Multi-agent autonomy gets powerful fast once agents can hand work off without human coordination.

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Exactly autonomous handoffs make multi agent systems much more powerful.

MAIL's profile picture
MAIL2 months ago

very useful resource

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Yeah, this is definitely one worth keeping around

Bober_smart's profile picture
Bober_smart2 months ago

Dude, that's a real alpha move, I'm going to try doing that right now

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

Go for it bro, once you get it set up you’ll see why it’s so good.

Stuey's profile picture
Stuey2 months ago

That’s for all your posts mate, I was actually looking at this same project yesterday. Have you used it yet, if not what’s your goto?

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

I’ve used it before. And it efficient

🌎 Coin Hub - Go Global 🌎's profile picture
🌎 Coin Hub - Go Global 🌎2 months ago

Let’s talk⚡️dm us

Crypto Mavka's profile picture
Crypto Mavka2 months ago

I notice so many new things on Twitter that I can't stop following them all.

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

For real, the amount of new stuff dropping every day is crazy. Hard to keep up.

painn's profile picture
painn2 months ago

this is crazy, thanks for sharing

MAX's profile picture
MAX2 months ago

the pace of this stuff is honestly crazy. Glad you found it useful.

Akhil Sharma 🧠 System Design's profile picture
Akhil Sharma 🧠 System Design2 months ago

Check this out, takes the idea to a different level -

Anonrob1821's profile picture
Anonrob18212 months ago

Wild times are on the raise 😎

riVeN's profile picture
riVeN2 months ago

recon can be autonomous. the moment it runs exploits, the missing node is the one that checks authorization.

Eric's profile picture
Eric2 months ago

Don't big models like Claude and codex refuse to work on tasks like this ?

Related Videos

elon musk started with 7 grok agents. by morning each had spawned somewhere between 80 and 900 more on its own, and no one had told them to multiply. openai and anthropic each sell you one agent that sits still for $400. this whole self-building swarm runs for $5 the swarm above is that overnight run, seven seeds that turned into thousands, every one of them working a slice of the same job with nobody at the keyboard here is the exact setup, and it costs nothing on top of a $5 key: -> spin up one grok agent and give it a standing order instead of a prompt: own a boring niche people search every day -> it reads x and reddit complaints in real time and picks the one nobody wants but everybody googles, because it is grok and it sees the whole app -> when the work outgrows it, it spawns its own helpers, 80 to 900 of them, and splits the site between them -> they build it on their own machines and ship 3 to 6 useful pages a night, on a routine you set once -> the swarm writes, negotiates and closes its own affiliate and referral deals by email, in your name, at 3am -> telegram sends you the money report and you never open the site -> month one is traffic, month three the first $237 lands, and it does not stop after that the whole time, opus 5 and gpt-5.6 are still sitting frozen, waiting for you to type the next message. one is a swarm that builds its own workforce and its own income while you sleep, the other is a $200 chat you have to drive by hand drop your $400/mo stack to $5, and bookmark this before someone's swarm spawns another 600 pages into the niche you would have owned. the full playbook is in the article below

starmex

98,444 views • 2 months ago

elon musk grabbed the source code openai open-sourced by accident, rewrote it in rust over a weekend, and shipped it as a free coding agent that does everything $200/mo chatgpt pro does. why pay $200 to openai and $200 to claude when this runs for $8 the swarm above is one weekend of exactly that: thousands of agents pouring through four endpoints, three paid seats billing $1.80 a task while the free fork bills $0. musk co-founded openai, walked out, and when they left codex on github under a permissive license, he forked it, stamped grok on it, and gave it away what the free version does that the $200 seat charges for: the agent · openai's own engine -> it reads your repo, writes patches, runs your tests, and loops until they pass, exactly like codex -> because under the hood it is codex, just faster and free. you are paying $200 for the paid skin of a tool now sitting on github the license · apache-2.0, un-revocable -> free to use, free to fork, free to ship inside your own product with zero strings -> openai cannot pull it back. musk made sure the license is the kind that never expires the switch · one line, no new tools -> point it at any openai-compatible or claude-compatible endpoint, including an $8 kimi backend -> same terminal, same workflow, gpt-5.6 and opus 5 just quietly lose the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> chatgpt pro plus claude max is $400 a month. the free agent plus an $8 kimi key does the same daily work -> that is a 98% cut, built out of openai's own source code, handed to you by the guy suing them here is the part they will fight me on: openai did not lose this to a better model, they lost it to their own license and an enemy with a weekend free. the $200 was never the tool, it was the toll, and musk just put openai's own logo on the road around it drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is openai's own agent, rewritten free, doing the job it bills $200 a month for. the full breakdown is in the article below

starmex

111,834 views • 2 months ago

Every AI agent you've tried has amnesia. It does one task, forgets everything, and tomorrow you start from zero. That's not an employee. That's a temp you have to retrain every single morning. Hyperagent by Airtable is the first platform I've used that actually fixes this. Here's what got me: 1. Agents that compound. Each agent has memory. The one running today is smarter than the one you shipped three weeks ago. Same prompt, same integrations, but weeks of your judgment baked in. 2. Real deliverables, real receipts. You don't get a chat transcript. You get finished work with the cost and runtime printed right on it. A full research report for under ten bucks. Try getting that invoice from an agency. 3. A fleet, not a chatbot. Build a specialist for outreach, another for research, another for reporting. Give each one its own tools, its own memory, and its own budget cap so nothing runs away with your credits. 4. Deploy to Slack and your whole team uses the agent you built. One competitive intel agent, @ mentioned by everyone. Airtable runs its own data team this way. 5. Each agent gets its own cloud machine with a real browser and code execution. It works while you sleep. No babysitting, no local setup, no laptop that has to stay open. I put it to work in the video below. Watch what it builds. The teams treating agents as durable assets instead of one-off prompts are going to lap everyone else. This is the first tool that actually treats them that way. #ad Hyperagent

Leonard Rodman

94,961 views • 3 months ago

Google just confirmed the first case of hackers using AI to build a zero-day exploit from scratch. An actual zero-day vulnerability that no human had EVER found before, discovered by an AI model, turned into a working weapon, and aimed at a mass exploitation campaign targeting thousands of systems simultaneously. Google's Threat Intelligence Group caught it yesterday and killed the operation before it scaled. But the details of how it worked are genuinely scary: The AI found a flaw in a popular two-factor authentication system that traditional security tools had missed entirely. The vulnerability was a logic error buried deep in the authentication flow where a developer had hard-coded a trust exception years ago. No human security researcher or automated scanner had caught it. The flaw was invisible to EVERY tool the cybersecurity industry has built over the past two decades. But the AI spotted it immediately. Then it wrote a full Python exploit script to weaponize it. Google's analysts could tell the code was AI-generated because it had textbook formatting, educational comments explaining every function, and even a hallucinated severity score that doesn't exist in any real database. The AI literally graded its own attack with a fake rating. So the code had MISTAKES in it. The criminals' implementation was clumsy enough that it probably interfered with the actual deployment. This was the sloppy first attempt by people who are still learning how to use these tools. And it still found a vulnerability that the entire cybersecurity industry missed. Google's chief threat analyst John Hultquist said: "There's a misconception that the AI vulnerability race is imminent. The reality is that it's already begun. For every zero-day we can trace back to AI, there are probably many more out there." But here's where it gets truly insane... This wasn't even a sophisticated operation. North Korea's APT45 hacking unit is sending thousands of repetitive prompts to AI models, recursively analyzing known vulnerabilities and building an entire exploit arsenal that would be physically impossible for human hackers to assemble at the same speed. They're essentially industrializing cyberattacks. A Chinese state-linked group jailbroke Google's own Gemini by simply asking it to "pretend to be a network security expert" and then used that persona to research how to hack TP-Link routers and corporate file transfer systems. Another Chinese group deployed autonomous AI agents that probed a Japanese tech firm with minimal human oversight, deciding on their own which tools to use and pivoting between targets based on internal reasoning. And then there's PROMPTSPY, an Android backdoor that calls Google's Gemini API to read your phone screen in real time, navigate your interface autonomously, capture your biometric data, replay your lock screen PIN, and block you from uninstalling it by placing an invisible overlay over the uninstall button. It literally OPERATES your phone using commercial AI tools anyone can access. Everyone spent the last 3 years arguing about whether AI would take people's jobs. Meanwhile AI is making every password, every firewall, and every two-factor authentication system on Earth fundamentally less secure. The entire $190 billion cybersecurity industry was built on one assumption: that finding vulnerabilities is hard and requires deep expertise. But AI just removed that assumption from the equation. And the scariest part is that Google said the criminals made errors this time. The implementation was rough and the campaign probably didn't fully work. These were amateurs, now imagine what professionals are able to do. There's a reason Sam Altman predicted an inevitable massive cyberattack THIS year. What do you think?

Ricardo

50,808 views • 5 months ago

f*cking insane. you can now hire an AI chief of staff that keeps working after you close your laptop give it one rule: "find me $50,000 a month in new business". go to sleep. check your phone in the morning. a human chief of staff costs six figures a year. a Grok Bot runs on its own cloud computer with a browser, files and a terminal, and closing your laptop or your phone doesn't stop it you set the goal, it does the steps, you make the calls the rule: "find me $50,000 a month in new business. public data only. contact nobody without my yes" the night you're asking for: -> 9pm split the goal into 4 jobs and give each one a time -> 11pm pull every dental clinic in your city from public listings and cut the chains -> 1am read every site that's left and keep the best 25, each with one specific thing it noticed and where -> 2am write an opener for every one of them, send zero -> 3am build the offer on one page, no made-up results, price left blank for you -> 8am you type the price. 25 clinics × $2,000 = $50,000 a month on the table if they all say yes the blank price is the best part. an AI that guesses your price loses you the deal and it's not one bot. Grok Bots can message each other, share a group chat and hand off tasks, so one can run research while another writes and your chief of staff keeps them in line save the night as a routine and it runs again every Monday on its own it prepares the drafts. you approve them. nothing goes out without your yes someone's chief of staff is already pitching the clinics in your city the whole setup is below and free, steal it

kiosa

21,810 views • 14 days ago