This is gold!!!

Let me debunk this before I enjoy my day. First: crucifixion. The claim that crucifixion did not exist before Jesus is historically false. Public execution on wood predates Rome by centuries. Ancient Egyptians practiced impalement and suspension on poles. Assyrians documented mass executions on wooden stakes. Persians fixed bodies to wood under Darius. Rome did not invent crucifixion. They standardized it. So framing crucifixion as a uniquely Roman or post-Jesus invention is basic historical ignorance. Second: “Al-Sāmirī.” The Qur’an does not call him a Samaritan. It names him as Al-Sāmirī, a specific individual. This is entirely consistent with Semitic naming conventions, where nisbahs and titles indicate origin, affiliation, or lineage. Pretending this is an anachronism only exposes unfamiliarity with Semitic linguistics, not an error in the Qur’an. Third: Qur’an 18:86. The verse says he found it setting in murky water. This is phenomenological language. Humans still say “sunrise” and “sunset” today without implying geocentrism. The verse explicitly describes Dhul-Qarnayn’s perception, not a cosmological claim. Classical tafsir understood this centuries ago. Fourth: Qur’an 86:6–7. The passage does not say humans are created from bones. It speaks about a gushing fluid emerging from a region described spatially. Classical scholars interpreted this as origin and emergence, not anatomy. Reading it as a modern biology textbook is a category error, not a Qur’anic one. The pattern is always the same. Remove Arabic. Ignore classical exegesis. Impose modern literalism. Then declare victory. That is not scholarship. That is translation cherry-picking. Every so-called Qur’an “mistake” disappears the moment Arabic, context, and genre are respected. The Qur’an did not fail history. It did not fail science. These arguments fail because they were never grounded in understanding to begin with.

Stop arguing or conversing with this people,They will never believe except Allah will.

When you actually understand the Arabic language then come lecture us on mistakes in the Quran. Google translate won’t help you. Every word has multiple meanings including "لأُصلِّبنكم" which is meant in this case to come from the word صلب (harden) not صليب (crucifix). Nice try.

Alexander the Great had horns. This was well known and not a metaphor.

The responsibility of believing in a single, true deity rests with the believer. It is essential to scrutinize every doctrine and evaluate every spiritual leader, including prophets, pastors, and clerics, to determine who embodies the spirit of the one true God of creation and who embodies the spirit of evil. The spirit of the true God is characterized by love, and those who lack love are not of God. Righteousness, holiness, peace, forgiveness, and joy in the Holy Spirit are attributes of God, while those who lack these qualities represent evil, Satan, and the fallen angels, both in this life and the next.

I don't know why people are so daft

✅ important facts 1⃣: "This is not intended to discuss the 'meaning of Verse 71' or its linguistic and religious interpretation within the Arab and Islamic context, but rather to refute the video publisher's claim and debunk it using facts: - Did the Pharaohs know 'something resembling crucifixion'? = the answer is yes, The Ancient Egyptians of the New Kingdom (the time of Ramesses II and Merneptah – 13th century BC) practiced the punishment of 'Impalement', which is considered the legitimate ancestor of crucifixion. Linguistic Evidence: In hieroglyphic texts, the punishment was referred to as 'placing on the wood' (di her khet). Physical Evidence: There are depictions at Karnak Temple and other temples showing enemy prisoners (Nubians or Libyans) suspended and pierced by wooden stakes. This was the 'Pharaonic' method that was later paralleled by the 'Roman' method of crucifixion."

Click bait.

Well actually. No. You’re wrong. 1. 20:71 mentions the word “crucify” in the English translation. “Salab” or “صلب” can be used for the word crucify but it can also be used for impale which was present in ancient Egypt which is when the ayah is based. 2. 20:95 mentions the Prophet Musa AS speaking to al Samiri who is a singular individual as you can see if you read the very next ayah. He wasn’t addressing the Samaritan community. 3. Semen doesn’t literally come from between the backbone and the rib cage but in classical Arabic, this phrase just means the lower torso, the area around the reproductive organs. 4. “Until he reached the setting point of the sun, which APPEARED TO HIM to be setting in a spring of murky water. It’s a phenomenological description, describing what he saw from his viewpoint, not making a scientific claim about the sun. 5. Quran 18:83–101 tells the story of Dhul Qarnayn, a God guided ruler, and is not about Alexander the Great. The Quran gives no Greek or Macedonian details and the Alexander connection comes from later legends AFTER the Quran was compiled. The story’s purpose is moral and spiritual not providing a historical biography. Any similarity to Alexander is coincidental.

So the Quran is wrong and this is true lol you people are pathetic

Egyptians did crucify but not the Roman kind of crucifixion. Arabs did not crucify. The Quran was referring to what the Egyptian Pharaoh said, not what Arabs said.

Get your facts correct none of the five mistakes you mentioned are are fact. It shows that misunderstanding of the Arabic language .. learn proper Arabic grammar, adjectives.. etc once you do that read the Quran again. Don’t be a copycat and repeater.

He forgot the one where Jesus’s mom Mary is also Moses’s sister Miriam lmfao

Looking for mistake in Qur’an while defending a text stitched together by committees is peak delusion.

The Quran know these things way before they even happen including the formation of a child inside a womb way before ultrasound even existed

Jesus Christ is Lord and creator of all. Only way to God is thru Jesus. Narrow is the way

Mohammed flew to the moon on a winged horse and burst the moon asunder yeah didn't happen now apostate you promised

A lot of mistakes: Crucifixion existed before Rome (ṣalb = hanging on wood). “Sâmiri” is a name, not Samaritans. “Backbone & ribs” = reproductive organ origin, not semen flow. Sun “appeared to set” = perception, not literal. Dhul-Qarnayn ≠ Alexander; similar stories don’t mean

Ignorant! This video brings back old, false claims: • The Assyrians and Persians used crucifixion long before Rome. No, that's not an anachronism. • "As-Sāmirī" does not mean "modern Samaritans." This is a translation mistake, not a historical one. • People read Qur'an 86:6–7 wrong; it doesn't say that semen comes from the ribs or spine. • The phrase "setting in muddy water" describes what is seen, not a scientific claim. It's the same as saying "sunset" today. • Dhul-Qarnayn is not called Alexander; sharing stories is not the same as copying. This is an academic argument, not evidence. "Call on Jesus" at the end isn't proof; it's trying to convert people after weak arguments.

✅ 2⃣ The Difference between Al-Samiri and The Samaritans Many people confuse the individual "Al-Samiri" mentioned in the Quran with the "Samaritan" sect that exists to this day. In reality, there is a fundamental chronological and theological difference between the two. 1. The Core Difference: A Deviant Individual vs. A Monotheistic Sect Al-Samiri (In the Quran): He is a specific individual who lived during the time of the Prophet Moses (approx. 14th–13th century BCE). He was an Israelite (or an outsider who joined them) who feigned belief, then exploited Moses' absence to craft the Golden Calf and incited the people to worship it. His story ended with a divine punishment pronounced by Moses: "For you in this life is to say, 'Do not touch me' (La Misas)," meaning he was condemned to total social isolation, neither touching nor being touched. The Samaritans (The Sect): This is a religious community of Israelites that emerged centuries after the time of Moses (specifically after the split of the Kingdom of Israel). They believe in the Torah (only the five books of Moses) and consider Mount Gerizim in Nablus to be their holy site. They do not follow Al-Samiri (the calf-maker); on the contrary, they disavow calf worship and consider it a major sin and idolatry, just like mainstream Jews and Muslims. Conclusion: The Samaritans (the sect) are not descendants or followers of Al-Samiri (the calf-maker); the similarity in names is linguistic, not a lineage of belief. 2. Why was he called "Al-Samiri"? This name has sparked historical debate because the city of "Samaria" (the capital of the northern Kingdom of Israel) was built centuries after Moses (by King Omri, approx. 880 BCE). So, how could the Quran mention "Al-Samiri" before the city of Samaria was built? The answer is that the name in the Quran is not attributed to the city of Samaria, but rather has more accurate linguistic and historical explanations: A. Attribution to a Clan (Shimron): The most likely opinion is that "Al-Samiri" refers to an ancient Israelite clan or tribe that existed during Moses' time called "Shimron". The Torah (Book of Genesis) mentions a son of Issachar (son of Jacob) named "Shimron," from whom the "Shimronite" clan originated. The word "Al-Samiri" is simply the Arabicized form of the Hebrew "Shimroni" (just as "Ismail" is the Arabicized form of "Yishmael"). Meaning: He was a man from the clan of Shimron, not a resident of the city of Samaria which had not yet been built. B. Attribution to an Attribute (The Guardian/Shomer): The word is derived from the Hebrew root "Shomer,"meaning "The Guardian" or "The Keeper." This may have been a functional title (he was a guard or leader). Or it may be a religious title he claimed for himself, implying he was the "Guardian of Knowledge" or possessed a truth others could not see, which aligns with his claim in the Quran: "I perceived what they did not perceive."

Aside from this dumb bastards goofy ass hairstyle, these missionary lies were debunked in the 90’s when the internet first became popular lollll. I can see people are already debunking them thoroughly in the replies so I’ll just grab my popcorn 🍿 😂

The man is stupid and doesn't know history 😒 Google translator won't help you bruh

Immediately after the fall God killed an animal to clothe Adam and Eve. The first image of sin causing death, and death covering sin. All through the Old Testament, God demanded animal sacrifice to pay for sin. Jesus was our sacrifice. Judgement day will find every one of us guilty. Our sentence will be death. Only Christ pays that fine. His death for ours. No amount of praying or fasting will satisfy a perfect Judge. Imagine thinking that when a Judge sentences you, you can ask for forgiveness because of how many times you prayed, or how you washed your hands, or how you fasted. Only Christ’s atoning sacrifice covers your sentence. Islam denies Christ’s death. A Jesus that didn’t die is not Jesus.

So, All he did what misinterpreted the Quran with ZERO knowledge and thought he did something? That’s why he is not debating anyone with knowledge even though they all said the same statements and answered them.

Muslims crashing out in the cs, but none of them saying he has told a lie.. all of them claiming he “misunderstands”😂 Okayy, tell us the correct thing, then?

Jesus is God.

Yo! What a fool! Moses was speaking to someone whose name was Samiri! Btw Scholars and people who speaks Arabic tried to find contradictions in the Quran and failed for sow many years! Poor little thinks he found mistakes in Quran😂

💯 the Quran is pieces of diffrent religions and and why the prophet Muhammad is fake

Eyin olodo (ignorant) here's your prove

First thing learn Arabic to know the meaning and than search for the mistake the only mistake is you with the translation and meaning totally changed