Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

This is how Charlie’s assassination went down. There were two hits (This explains the signals from the security guys to do both simultaneously) the "Mic Bomb" detonated by Brian Harpole and the pistol-camera fired by Rick Cutler—who was positioned above and behind Charlie. This would explain the holes in... show more

Irlandarra

31,278 subscribers

2,326,608 просмотров • 17 часов назад •via X (Twitter)

Юмор Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

‼️Candace Owens REVEALS That Brian Harpole Cut Off Charlie’s Freedom SHIRT At The Hospital — Was Charlie's Assassination An INSIDE Job?😳 Candace Owens just dropped a major detail about what happened to Charlie Kirk’s white “Freedom” shirt after the assassination. According to Brian Harpole’s own account on the Shawn Ryan Show, he personally cut the shirt off Charlie’s body once they arrived at the hospital. Candace points out how suspicious this is. If Charlie was killed by an explosive device in his microphone, that shirt would have been covered in residue and become one of the most important pieces of evidence. Instead, it appears to have vanished. She questions why Brian Harpole, who is not medical personnel, was allowed to cut the shirt off and remove it in the first place. This lines up with the growing pattern of evidence conveniently disappearing — from the soil at the scene being dug up and replaced within days, to the necklace being handed over, and now the shirt. Hey Andrew Kolvet and FBI Salt Lake City Where is the clothing Charlie Kirk was wearing that day??? FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

‼️Candace Owens REVEALS That Brian Harpole Cut Off Charlie’s Freedom SHIRT At The Hospital — Was Charlie's Assassination An INSIDE Job?😳 Candace Owens just dropped a major detail about what happened to Charlie Kirk’s white “Freedom” shirt after the assassination. According to Brian Harpole’s own account on the Shawn Ryan Show, he personally cut the shirt off Charlie’s body once they arrived at the hospital. Candace points out how suspicious this is. If Charlie was killed by an explosive device in his microphone, that shirt would have been covered in residue and become one of the most important pieces of evidence. Instead, it appears to have vanished. She questions why Brian Harpole, who is not medical personnel, was allowed to cut the shirt off and remove it in the first place. This lines up with the growing pattern of evidence conveniently disappearing — from the soil at the scene being dug up and replaced within days, to the necklace being handed over, and now the shirt. Hey Andrew Kolvet and FBI Salt Lake City Where is the clothing Charlie Kirk was wearing that day??? FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

53,010 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨Forensic expert reveals that Charlie Kirk’s freedom shirt may be one of the most critical pieces of evidence in his assassination. But there is a major question: where is the shirt now? The expert says the alleged decision by Brian Harpole to cut it makes no sense.

🚨Forensic expert reveals that Charlie Kirk’s freedom shirt may be one of the most critical pieces of evidence in his assassination. But there is a major question: where is the shirt now? The expert says the alleged decision by Brian Harpole to cut it makes no sense.

Grace Ashford

25,129 просмотров • 26 дней назад

📢 So these "Rode Mic" morons think Charlie would lay the hand held down just the right way to have the mic explode and magically send a projectile directly into CKs neck??????? Why would an assassination team leave such AIMMING to a massive CHANCE????? Smdh... PALM PISTOL RICKY SHOT CHARLIE KIRK! NOT TYLER ROBINSON, NOT SOME "EXPLOSIVE RODE MIC",...... PALM PISTOL RICKY, RICK CUTLER! OPEN YOUR EYES AND USE YOUR BRAINS!

📢 So these "Rode Mic" morons think Charlie would lay the hand held down just the right way to have the mic explode and magically send a projectile directly into CKs neck??????? Why would an assassination team leave such AIMMING to a massive CHANCE????? Smdh... PALM PISTOL RICKY SHOT CHARLIE KIRK! NOT TYLER ROBINSON, NOT SOME "EXPLOSIVE RODE MIC",...... PALM PISTOL RICKY, RICK CUTLER! OPEN YOUR EYES AND USE YOUR BRAINS!

Val Venis™ (The Big Valbowski™)

44,586 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Going down the Harpole rabbit hole 🕳️ Brian Harpole jumps on top of Charlie at the hospital and cuts off his Freedom shirt ? Gives orders on pushing drugs and defibrillators. 🧐 this hospital 🏥 is Sus !!!!

Going down the Harpole rabbit hole 🕳️ Brian Harpole jumps on top of Charlie at the hospital and cuts off his Freedom shirt ? Gives orders on pushing drugs and defibrillators. 🧐 this hospital 🏥 is Sus !!!!

Alley Files

32,811 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

There were three actions: one person raised his hand, another fired, and a third placed a piece of paper to obstruct the cameras behind the suspect who fired. Clear evidence became visible after the shot. This aligns with Mr. Eric's testimony regarding the sound and type of weapon that might have been used in Kirk's assassination, as he described the shot as a 9mm, and its sound was not deep, but more like a cherry bomb. The camera that was behind Charlie was capable of capturing everything happening in front of him with high precision, but it was removed and the SD card was seized. However, here is a note: it seems that the leaking of the clips is being controlled. Whenever people suspect one individual, the next day a different suspect appears with evidence suggesting that he is the culprit. Moreover, the leaked clips are of poor quality. All of this supports the theory of flooding the crime scene with distractions in all directions, indicating that someone reviewed the assassination plan from both legal and psychological perspectives. This suggests that this carefully orchestrated plan to carry out a daytime assassination was not improvised but took considerable time to prepare and even train for. The purpose of this distraction and doubt is to deflect suspicion from those who were around Charlie Kirk's tent in the front rows, on the right, in front, and behind, as I mentioned earlier in previous comments.

There were three actions: one person raised his hand, another fired, and a third placed a piece of paper to obstruct the cameras behind the suspect who fired. Clear evidence became visible after the shot. This aligns with Mr. Eric's testimony regarding the sound and type of weapon that might have been used in Kirk's assassination, as he described the shot as a 9mm, and its sound was not deep, but more like a cherry bomb. The camera that was behind Charlie was capable of capturing everything happening in front of him with high precision, but it was removed and the SD card was seized. However, here is a note: it seems that the leaking of the clips is being controlled. Whenever people suspect one individual, the next day a different suspect appears with evidence suggesting that he is the culprit. Moreover, the leaked clips are of poor quality. All of this supports the theory of flooding the crime scene with distractions in all directions, indicating that someone reviewed the assassination plan from both legal and psychological perspectives. This suggests that this carefully orchestrated plan to carry out a daytime assassination was not improvised but took considerable time to prepare and even train for. The purpose of this distraction and doubt is to deflect suspicion from those who were around Charlie Kirk's tent in the front rows, on the right, in front, and behind, as I mentioned earlier in previous comments.

Isaac Ali 🇳🇿 إسحاق الجيزاني

252,383 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

…and this is the behind the scenes footage of how it went down, captured by Aliona Baranova #NoJusticeForBingBong

…and this is the behind the scenes footage of how it went down, captured by Aliona Baranova #NoJusticeForBingBong

Devora Wilde

216,906 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Assassination of Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security. modified wireless mic was the weapon that kiIIed him The bodyguards killed Charlie Kirk; +They gave the signs right before the hit. +They detonated the bomb in the mic +They laugh at the dying victim. +they get rid of the evidence of the crime : The modified lapel mic that struck Charlie Kirk’s neck being discreetly handed off and removed from the crime scene. +They carry the lifeless body to the car like a sack of potatoes.

Assassination of Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security. modified wireless mic was the weapon that kiIIed him The bodyguards killed Charlie Kirk; +They gave the signs right before the hit. +They detonated the bomb in the mic +They laugh at the dying victim. +they get rid of the evidence of the crime : The modified lapel mic that struck Charlie Kirk’s neck being discreetly handed off and removed from the crime scene. +They carry the lifeless body to the car like a sack of potatoes.

Irlandarra

56,162 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING NEWS! 🚨 Ben Shapiro just confessed on his show that while Charlie was being transported to the hospital and bleeding out to death, his security was on the phone with Charlie’s security receiving updates. I knew it. I knew it. I knew it Someone explain to me why during the minutes while Charlie was DYING in the back seat of the car— Charlie’s security team was providing updates to Ben Shapiro’s team rather than focusing entirely on saving Charlie’s life and finding the killer? I will remind you all that Brian Harpole— one of the security members who was IN that car en route to the hospital, is currently suing me and is using BEN SHAPIRO’S lawyer who has sued me relentlessly on Ben’s behalf for the last 3 years. Ben Shapiro hated Charlie. EVERYONE knew that. So why the hell was this demon receiving updates in the mere minutes after Charlie was hit, en route to the hospital?!! WHO ON CHARLIE’S SECURITY TEAM BETRAYED HIM IN THIS WAY?! EVERYTHING Ben did following the assassination made my alarm bells go off. I have told you guys that there is something about the Daily Wire and their relentlessly stalking of me following my firing that has made me feel altogether unsafe. I have felt their obsessive focus on destroying me is deranged and increasingly dangerous. What did Andrew Kolvet mean when he told me “it was supposed to be you?” Why did Turning Point betray Charlie so quickly by allowing Ben to open at Amfest after declaring immediately that he would “pick up Charlie’s blood mic”? Why didn’t Ben mention this before today that he was receiving status updates while Charlie was bleeding out? I clocked that Ben was TOO invested in this. His energy on stage DEMANDING that Megyn Kelly call me evil and his overprotective stance on Erika always registered to me as deeply nervous. Ben Shapiro is Satanic. Everything in my soul tells me he worships Satan, literally. Look at his demeanor in this clip. We need to find out exactly who on Charlie’s team betrayed him by providing immediate updates to this parasite. Share far and wide.

🚨BREAKING NEWS! 🚨 Ben Shapiro just confessed on his show that while Charlie was being transported to the hospital and bleeding out to death, his security was on the phone with Charlie’s security receiving updates. I knew it. I knew it. I knew it Someone explain to me why during the minutes while Charlie was DYING in the back seat of the car— Charlie’s security team was providing updates to Ben Shapiro’s team rather than focusing entirely on saving Charlie’s life and finding the killer? I will remind you all that Brian Harpole— one of the security members who was IN that car en route to the hospital, is currently suing me and is using BEN SHAPIRO’S lawyer who has sued me relentlessly on Ben’s behalf for the last 3 years. Ben Shapiro hated Charlie. EVERYONE knew that. So why the hell was this demon receiving updates in the mere minutes after Charlie was hit, en route to the hospital?!! WHO ON CHARLIE’S SECURITY TEAM BETRAYED HIM IN THIS WAY?! EVERYTHING Ben did following the assassination made my alarm bells go off. I have told you guys that there is something about the Daily Wire and their relentlessly stalking of me following my firing that has made me feel altogether unsafe. I have felt their obsessive focus on destroying me is deranged and increasingly dangerous. What did Andrew Kolvet mean when he told me “it was supposed to be you?” Why did Turning Point betray Charlie so quickly by allowing Ben to open at Amfest after declaring immediately that he would “pick up Charlie’s blood mic”? Why didn’t Ben mention this before today that he was receiving status updates while Charlie was bleeding out? I clocked that Ben was TOO invested in this. His energy on stage DEMANDING that Megyn Kelly call me evil and his overprotective stance on Erika always registered to me as deeply nervous. Ben Shapiro is Satanic. Everything in my soul tells me he worships Satan, literally. Look at his demeanor in this clip. We need to find out exactly who on Charlie’s team betrayed him by providing immediate updates to this parasite. Share far and wide.

Candace Owens

9,783,003 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Candace Owens: The bullet wasn’t magically stopped by his neck Also Candace Owens: “…The part that he is telling truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet, without question, okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, and I'm telling you this 100%, Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit, uh, and at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck……I have fact-checked this information from multiple sources now....

Candace Owens: The bullet wasn’t magically stopped by his neck Also Candace Owens: “…The part that he is telling truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet, without question, okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, and I'm telling you this 100%, Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit, uh, and at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck……I have fact-checked this information from multiple sources now....

NΛTLY DΞNISΞ

27,538 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING 🚨 Apparently, Turning Point USA staff have the footage of Charlie being shot, from a camera that was positioned above, and behind him: They took the camera down, while contaminating the crime scene.

🚨BREAKING 🚨 Apparently, Turning Point USA staff have the footage of Charlie being shot, from a camera that was positioned above, and behind him: They took the camera down, while contaminating the crime scene.

John Cullen 🐓

1,979,272 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Candace Owens has claimed that she saw the video from the camera directly behind Charlie Kirk. In this video, she confirms exactly what we have reported on from the beginning. There was no exit wound. The Bullet hit his spine, snapped his neck, and never exited his body.

Candace Owens has claimed that she saw the video from the camera directly behind Charlie Kirk. In this video, she confirms exactly what we have reported on from the beginning. There was no exit wound. The Bullet hit his spine, snapped his neck, and never exited his body.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

229,499 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

.Candace Owens has repeatedly used the Fort Huachuca story to claim and insinuate that Erika Kirk, Brian Harpole, Rep. Mark Amodei, TPUSA, Cabot Phillips, and the U.S. military were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. In Episode 277, she claimed TPUSA sent Charlie to Asia so he wouldn’t witness this top-secret assassination meeting at Fort Huachuca. She promoted it by saying: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." "It feels like today will be the day that the government can no longer deny it." "A story from a man in the military that is about to blow this case open." On her show, she went further: "I just cannot see how this would lead to anything other than a full confession from the government about the military's involvement in his assassination." That entire narrative rests solely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a court-documented pathological liar—and was sold as a pre-assassination meeting involving the U.S. military, Charlie’s wife, his head of security, his colleagues, and a sitting member of Congress. Yesterday, when Harrison H. Smith ✞ asked a simple question—why does Fort Huachuca matter, and what is the actual claim?—Candace suddenly shifted. Instead of standing by the accusation, she argued it “matters” because Brian Harpole gave an alibi and “acted weird,” citing vague suspicions, while refusing to say whether it was an assassination meeting at all. "It matters because why would Brian Harpole be at Fort Huachuca at all? It matters because he's giving an alibi which means he doesn't want to be associated... Like I said, Brian Harpole was acting funny. He's been acting weird. He cared enough to present an alibi, meaning he didn't want people to think he was there, right? So if you have to, if you have to give someone an alibi, is because you don't want people to think that you're there. Is an alibi is not needed if there's nothing to hide. So that's why I think that's why it matters." When pressed again on Erika Kirk’s involvement, Candace deflected—saying Erika wasn’t there that day (but was there the day before), insisting it’s not about conclusions, only “following lies” and “not normal reactions,” and admitting she “cannot definitely say” it was an assassination meeting. But Candace herself opened this story by declaring: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." You don’t get to accuse the U.S. military of murder, name Charlie's loved ones as participants in this top secret assassination planning meeting, hype an imminent government confession—and then retreat into "I’m just asking questions" and "why is he giving an alibi?" This is unhinged, baseless slander followed by gaslighting—built entirely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a child-kidnapping, women-abusing, court-documented pathological liar, whose story Candace incentivized with a $141,000 GiveSendGo campaign.

.Candace Owens has repeatedly used the Fort Huachuca story to claim and insinuate that Erika Kirk, Brian Harpole, Rep. Mark Amodei, TPUSA, Cabot Phillips, and the U.S. military were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. In Episode 277, she claimed TPUSA sent Charlie to Asia so he wouldn’t witness this top-secret assassination meeting at Fort Huachuca. She promoted it by saying: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." "It feels like today will be the day that the government can no longer deny it." "A story from a man in the military that is about to blow this case open." On her show, she went further: "I just cannot see how this would lead to anything other than a full confession from the government about the military's involvement in his assassination." That entire narrative rests solely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a court-documented pathological liar—and was sold as a pre-assassination meeting involving the U.S. military, Charlie’s wife, his head of security, his colleagues, and a sitting member of Congress. Yesterday, when Harrison H. Smith ✞ asked a simple question—why does Fort Huachuca matter, and what is the actual claim?—Candace suddenly shifted. Instead of standing by the accusation, she argued it “matters” because Brian Harpole gave an alibi and “acted weird,” citing vague suspicions, while refusing to say whether it was an assassination meeting at all. "It matters because why would Brian Harpole be at Fort Huachuca at all? It matters because he's giving an alibi which means he doesn't want to be associated... Like I said, Brian Harpole was acting funny. He's been acting weird. He cared enough to present an alibi, meaning he didn't want people to think he was there, right? So if you have to, if you have to give someone an alibi, is because you don't want people to think that you're there. Is an alibi is not needed if there's nothing to hide. So that's why I think that's why it matters." When pressed again on Erika Kirk’s involvement, Candace deflected—saying Erika wasn’t there that day (but was there the day before), insisting it’s not about conclusions, only “following lies” and “not normal reactions,” and admitting she “cannot definitely say” it was an assassination meeting. But Candace herself opened this story by declaring: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved." You don’t get to accuse the U.S. military of murder, name Charlie's loved ones as participants in this top secret assassination planning meeting, hype an imminent government confession—and then retreat into "I’m just asking questions" and "why is he giving an alibi?" This is unhinged, baseless slander followed by gaslighting—built entirely on the "eyewitness" testimony of a child-kidnapping, women-abusing, court-documented pathological liar, whose story Candace incentivized with a $141,000 GiveSendGo campaign.

KanekoaTheGreat

348,825 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Who organised this video calling for rebellion from the CIA and the Armed Services of the United States by Democrat lawmakers? Maggie Goodlander is the wife of Hillary's closest advisor and former Biden's National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan. Both Hillary and Biden were supported by the Deep State elements of the intelligence community.

Who organised this video calling for rebellion from the CIA and the Armed Services of the United States by Democrat lawmakers? Maggie Goodlander is the wife of Hillary's closest advisor and former Biden's National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan. Both Hillary and Biden were supported by the Deep State elements of the intelligence community.

Svetlana Lokhova

154,819 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Candace Owens received a tip from someone who was directly involved in the planning for a Charlie Kirk’s event the following day of his assassination, and TPUSA’S security detail had no plan in place! Why didn’t Brian Harpole have security plans for the following day?

Candace Owens received a tip from someone who was directly involved in the planning for a Charlie Kirk’s event the following day of his assassination, and TPUSA’S security detail had no plan in place! Why didn’t Brian Harpole have security plans for the following day?

FromConvict2Conservative

55,518 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

There are at least two Candace Owens’—the Candace in this clip, which is the woman Charlie hired, befriended, and cared for. And then the Candace who exists today, whom Charlie would not recognize and in whom he would be disappointed and even ashamed by. Any claim this woman had on Charlie died with this version of her.

There are at least two Candace Owens’—the Candace in this clip, which is the woman Charlie hired, befriended, and cared for. And then the Candace who exists today, whom Charlie would not recognize and in whom he would be disappointed and even ashamed by. Any claim this woman had on Charlie died with this version of her.

Natalie Jean Beisner

46,023 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Jammu: Loitering munition fired by Pakistan was destroyed by the bomb disposal squad of security forces and NSG (National Security Guard). This drone was found in a village near Jammu.

#WATCH | Jammu: Loitering munition fired by Pakistan was destroyed by the bomb disposal squad of security forces and NSG (National Security Guard). This drone was found in a village near Jammu.

ANI

232,557 просмотров • 1 год назад

Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson claims Iranian protests were ASTROTURFED by the CIA, Mossad, and MI6—and describes how various countries may have collaborated to set up the conditions. “This was a long planned OP… CIA, Mossad, and most likely MI6 were involved. The first step was to crash the currency, create an economic crisis… That launched on Dec. 28th, the next day Trump and Netanyahu were meeting.” Watch The Matt Gaetz Show Here:

Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson claims Iranian protests were ASTROTURFED by the CIA, Mossad, and MI6—and describes how various countries may have collaborated to set up the conditions. “This was a long planned OP… CIA, Mossad, and most likely MI6 were involved. The first step was to crash the currency, create an economic crisis… That launched on Dec. 28th, the next day Trump and Netanyahu were meeting.” Watch The Matt Gaetz Show Here:

One America News

102,010 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: UNDENIABLE PROOF OF MULTIPLE SHOOTERS IN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION! 😱Assassins Sync Shots to Kill Charlie—This Changes EVERYTHING! 👀 You thought it was just one sniper? WRONG. Frame-by-frame analysis shows Charlie was HIT FROM BOTH SIDES—back of the head by the BA roof sniper (I ID'd the shooter in my last vid), and CENTER-MASS CHEST SHOT FROM THE FRONT by a PALM GUN in the crowd! Meet SUSPECT #2: "Aviator Sunglasses Guy" Rick Cutler—Charlie's own SECURITY! Watch him "adjust his sleeve" (already rolled up to his bicep??) right as the shots ring out. Barrel peeks between his fingers, BULLET VISIBLE MID-AIR from his palm! Squeeze, recoil, BOOM—Charlie's shirt puffs out from the impact. Instant kill. No chance. They synced the shots to sound like ONE. But we see it: Neck expands from rear hit, then FRONT SHOT ripples the shirt EXACTLY where the heart is. You can see the hole in Charlie's shirt from the projectile. Mic didn't explode—it's still there. Earpiece/Necklace flew, not blood. Eyewitness CORROBORATES: "Direct shot to the heart—shirt went red, fell back." Crowd drops like dominoes, no trampling. This isn't delusion—it's RIGHT THERE. Look up "palm gun." Who's covering this up? Share it out to get JUSTICE FOR CHARLIE!! 🕵️‍♂️

🚨 BREAKING: UNDENIABLE PROOF OF MULTIPLE SHOOTERS IN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION! 😱Assassins Sync Shots to Kill Charlie—This Changes EVERYTHING! 👀 You thought it was just one sniper? WRONG. Frame-by-frame analysis shows Charlie was HIT FROM BOTH SIDES—back of the head by the BA roof sniper (I ID'd the shooter in my last vid), and CENTER-MASS CHEST SHOT FROM THE FRONT by a PALM GUN in the crowd! Meet SUSPECT #2: "Aviator Sunglasses Guy" Rick Cutler—Charlie's own SECURITY! Watch him "adjust his sleeve" (already rolled up to his bicep??) right as the shots ring out. Barrel peeks between his fingers, BULLET VISIBLE MID-AIR from his palm! Squeeze, recoil, BOOM—Charlie's shirt puffs out from the impact. Instant kill. No chance. They synced the shots to sound like ONE. But we see it: Neck expands from rear hit, then FRONT SHOT ripples the shirt EXACTLY where the heart is. You can see the hole in Charlie's shirt from the projectile. Mic didn't explode—it's still there. Earpiece/Necklace flew, not blood. Eyewitness CORROBORATES: "Direct shot to the heart—shirt went red, fell back." Crowd drops like dominoes, no trampling. This isn't delusion—it's RIGHT THERE. Look up "palm gun." Who's covering this up? Share it out to get JUSTICE FOR CHARLIE!! 🕵️‍♂️

Project Constitution

184,199 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

This is the same husband of the unhinged Canadian woman who assaulted a pro-Trump teen. He made multiple videos laughing about and celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The videos were reported to his employer, and he was subsequently fired.

This is the same husband of the unhinged Canadian woman who assaulted a pro-Trump teen. He made multiple videos laughing about and celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The videos were reported to his employer, and he was subsequently fired.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

278,054 просмотров • 1 месяц назад