Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This is how history gets distorted— unintentionally. David Frum tells a powerful story about JFK’s assassination and Jacqueline Kennedy’s empathy for the wife of another victim that day. There’s just one problem. He says Lee Harvey Oswald killed a Secret Service agent. He didn’t. Oswald killed Dallas police officer...

geraldposner's profile picture

Gerald Posner

35,274 subscribers

68,764 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Time for a dose of reality. This 👇is the supposedly smoking gun video that Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said last night had "never been seen before" and "could blow open the entire JFK investigation." Luna said she learned about it from Oliver Stone and said the video "shows Oswald near the vehicle [JFK's limo] when the assassination took place, which means he couldn't have been the shooter." And she told a credulous Jesse Watters, NBC had been "very, very much guarding this tape." A small problem. It is NOT a secret video that has never been seen. It is available for anyone to watch at the Sixth Floor Museum in Dallas (or on their YouTube channel). What Rep. Luna is referring to is a clip of a film taken by Jimmy Darnell, an NBC affiliate cameraman who had been riding in the "press camera cars" behind the motorcade. He, and three other cameramen had jumped out of their car after the shots and started filming about 30 seconds AFTER the assassination. Darnell's film shows Dallas police officer Marrion Baker running to the front door of the Texas School Book Depository, and past the TSBD's supervisor, Roy Truly, both of whom would encounter Oswald in less than another 30 seconds, on the second floor. Oswald was on his way out of the building, having come down from the sixth floor after the shooting. Truly vouched for Oswald and Baker let him go. Some conspiracy theorists think that a few seconds in the Darnell film shows a figure on the far-left side of the front of the Texas School Book Depository they believe is Oswald. The figure has been dubbed prayer man, some say because of the way he has his arms crossed in front of him, while others think the conjecture is the equivalent of a conspiracy Hail Mary prayer long shot. For those not into the weeds on the JFK assassination, this is not the first time that a film or photo has been used to try and exonerate Oswald. For many years, conspiracy theorists contended that Oswald was visible in one of the pictures taken by James Altgens, an AP photographer at the scene. Oswald, they contended, was the fuzzy figure in a white t-shirt standing to the left entrance of the TSBD. That was in fact one of Oswald's coworkers, Billy Lovelady. Even AFTER Lovelady identified himself as the person in the photo, some conspiracy theorists refused to believe him. Oliver Stone and others have now turned to the Darnell film and the person standing to the left of Lovelady. Maybe that is Oswald. It is not even clear from the fuzzy image if it is absolutely a white man. It could even be a light-colored black or Latin person. But to Stone and Luna and others, it is Oswald. Thirteen of Oswald’s work colleagues were standing at the front steps of the Texas School Book Depository. They were there to watch the motorcade. Not one of them remembers seeing Oswald there. That has not stopped the conspiracy theorists, who claim the clothing on the unidentified man looks like what Oswald wore when he was arrested after killing Dallas police officer J.D. Tippit. Ten other Texas School Book Depository employees wore shirts like the one on “prayer man.” The entire exercise might as well be a Rorschach inkblot test. That is what happened before in the case, for instance, with a half-inch square portion of Mary Moorman’s badly faded Polaroid taken a split second after the assassination. Conspiracy theorists enhanced it and blew it up and thought they had found the image of the phantom second shooter on the Grassy Knoll, someone they dubbed “badgeman.” They claimed that greatly enlarged pixels identified a rifle and a Dallas police uniform. The enhanced photo only shows shadows and trees, no person, no shooter. Now, Oliver Stone and others believe the only thing preventing an ironclad identification of Oswald in the Darnell film is that they do not have the original first-generation. The Sixth Floor Museum version is a second-generation print of the film that the Museum acquired as part of a personal collection in 2006. No one is certain if a first-generation version exists, but the guess by Luna and Stone is that it must be somewhere in the long-lost archives at NBC. Not quite the same as NBC having, as Rep. Luna claimed, “very, very much guarding it.” I hope that the Oversight Committee gets the original Darnell video. Many of us would like to see the clearest possible version of the frenetic scenes that played out in the minutes after the assassination. For those, however, who think it will be dispositive and exculpatory evidence that Oswald was hanging out at the front of the School Book Depository, good luck. That story might earn a headline in the National Enquirer or the Daily Mail. It should not be the ‘breaking news’ from the congresswoman leading the new investigation into the assassination of President Kennedy.
0:39

Time for a dose of reality. This 👇is the supposedly smoking gun video that Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said last night had "never been seen before" and "could blow open the entire JFK investigation." Luna said she learned about it from Oliver Stone and said the video "shows Oswald near the vehicle [JFK's limo] when the assassination took place, which means he couldn't have been the shooter." And she told a credulous Jesse Watters, NBC had been "very, very much guarding this tape." A small problem. It is NOT a secret video that has never been seen. It is available for anyone to watch at the Sixth Floor Museum in Dallas (or on their YouTube channel). What Rep. Luna is referring to is a clip of a film taken by Jimmy Darnell, an NBC affiliate cameraman who had been riding in the "press camera cars" behind the motorcade. He, and three other cameramen had jumped out of their car after the shots and started filming about 30 seconds AFTER the assassination. Darnell's film shows Dallas police officer Marrion Baker running to the front door of the Texas School Book Depository, and past the TSBD's supervisor, Roy Truly, both of whom would encounter Oswald in less than another 30 seconds, on the second floor. Oswald was on his way out of the building, having come down from the sixth floor after the shooting. Truly vouched for Oswald and Baker let him go. Some conspiracy theorists think that a few seconds in the Darnell film shows a figure on the far-left side of the front of the Texas School Book Depository they believe is Oswald. The figure has been dubbed prayer man, some say because of the way he has his arms crossed in front of him, while others think the conjecture is the equivalent of a conspiracy Hail Mary prayer long shot. For those not into the weeds on the JFK assassination, this is not the first time that a film or photo has been used to try and exonerate Oswald. For many years, conspiracy theorists contended that Oswald was visible in one of the pictures taken by James Altgens, an AP photographer at the scene. Oswald, they contended, was the fuzzy figure in a white t-shirt standing to the left entrance of the TSBD. That was in fact one of Oswald's coworkers, Billy Lovelady. Even AFTER Lovelady identified himself as the person in the photo, some conspiracy theorists refused to believe him. Oliver Stone and others have now turned to the Darnell film and the person standing to the left of Lovelady. Maybe that is Oswald. It is not even clear from the fuzzy image if it is absolutely a white man. It could even be a light-colored black or Latin person. But to Stone and Luna and others, it is Oswald. Thirteen of Oswald’s work colleagues were standing at the front steps of the Texas School Book Depository. They were there to watch the motorcade. Not one of them remembers seeing Oswald there. That has not stopped the conspiracy theorists, who claim the clothing on the unidentified man looks like what Oswald wore when he was arrested after killing Dallas police officer J.D. Tippit. Ten other Texas School Book Depository employees wore shirts like the one on “prayer man.” The entire exercise might as well be a Rorschach inkblot test. That is what happened before in the case, for instance, with a half-inch square portion of Mary Moorman’s badly faded Polaroid taken a split second after the assassination. Conspiracy theorists enhanced it and blew it up and thought they had found the image of the phantom second shooter on the Grassy Knoll, someone they dubbed “badgeman.” They claimed that greatly enlarged pixels identified a rifle and a Dallas police uniform. The enhanced photo only shows shadows and trees, no person, no shooter. Now, Oliver Stone and others believe the only thing preventing an ironclad identification of Oswald in the Darnell film is that they do not have the original first-generation. The Sixth Floor Museum version is a second-generation print of the film that the Museum acquired as part of a personal collection in 2006. No one is certain if a first-generation version exists, but the guess by Luna and Stone is that it must be somewhere in the long-lost archives at NBC. Not quite the same as NBC having, as Rep. Luna claimed, “very, very much guarding it.” I hope that the Oversight Committee gets the original Darnell video. Many of us would like to see the clearest possible version of the frenetic scenes that played out in the minutes after the assassination. For those, however, who think it will be dispositive and exculpatory evidence that Oswald was hanging out at the front of the School Book Depository, good luck. That story might earn a headline in the National Enquirer or the Daily Mail. It should not be the ‘breaking news’ from the congresswoman leading the new investigation into the assassination of President Kennedy.

Gerald Posner

173,327 views • 1 year ago

There was a point in my conversation with Andrew Bridgen (Andrew Bridgen) where everything slowed down and the weight of what was being discussed became very real. This is a disgusting subject. It’s horrifying. And it’s exactly why it rarely gets talked about. Andrew speaks about child abuse and child trafficking into the UK and about how quickly the shutters come down when these issues are raised. Not debate. Not investigation. Silence. He goes further and explains something most people instinctively reject because it’s so hard to process. That at the very highest levels of power, child abuse and trafficking function as a form of sacrifice and as a binding mechanism. A glue that holds corruption together. Something so dark and compromising that it ensures silence, loyalty, and control among the most powerful people in the world. For most decent people, even contemplating this feels impossible. And that inability to imagine it is part of why it continues. It protects those involved. Andrew talks about having seen evidence. About how deeply disturbing it is. About the fact that even police officers investigating child abuse are limited in how long they can work on these cases because of the psychological damage it causes. This is not said lightly. And it’s not said for shock value. Posting this is not comfortable. Talking about it is not safe. Even sharing this conversation carries risk. But pretending these things don’t exist doesn’t make them go away. It only protects the structures that allow them to continue. If there are subjects that are truly forbidden, truly untouchable, then we should be asking why. And who benefits from that silence.
3:37

There was a point in my conversation with Andrew Bridgen (Andrew Bridgen) where everything slowed down and the weight of what was being discussed became very real. This is a disgusting subject. It’s horrifying. And it’s exactly why it rarely gets talked about. Andrew speaks about child abuse and child trafficking into the UK and about how quickly the shutters come down when these issues are raised. Not debate. Not investigation. Silence. He goes further and explains something most people instinctively reject because it’s so hard to process. That at the very highest levels of power, child abuse and trafficking function as a form of sacrifice and as a binding mechanism. A glue that holds corruption together. Something so dark and compromising that it ensures silence, loyalty, and control among the most powerful people in the world. For most decent people, even contemplating this feels impossible. And that inability to imagine it is part of why it continues. It protects those involved. Andrew talks about having seen evidence. About how deeply disturbing it is. About the fact that even police officers investigating child abuse are limited in how long they can work on these cases because of the psychological damage it causes. This is not said lightly. And it’s not said for shock value. Posting this is not comfortable. Talking about it is not safe. Even sharing this conversation carries risk. But pretending these things don’t exist doesn’t make them go away. It only protects the structures that allow them to continue. If there are subjects that are truly forbidden, truly untouchable, then we should be asking why. And who benefits from that silence.

Digby Furneaux

18,654 views • 6 months ago

Just recently Jay spoke about this exact thing. He talked about how big of a fan he is of Beyoncé’s creativity, gave an example of how she can hear something as simple as a drum sound and remember it months later when it’s needed. Also highlighted how great of a producer she is. This is also further proof that Beyoncé credits people for ANY contribution they’ve made to her music. Doesn’t matter if they weren’t directly involved in the creative process. That’s the right thing to do. Properly credit and compensate people for their work, and avoid petty lawsuits down the line.
0:23

Just recently Jay spoke about this exact thing. He talked about how big of a fan he is of Beyoncé’s creativity, gave an example of how she can hear something as simple as a drum sound and remember it months later when it’s needed. Also highlighted how great of a producer she is. This is also further proof that Beyoncé credits people for ANY contribution they’ve made to her music. Doesn’t matter if they weren’t directly involved in the creative process. That’s the right thing to do. Properly credit and compensate people for their work, and avoid petty lawsuits down the line.

Luis

100,818 views • 3 months ago

This is how vile and disgusting Candace Owens is... Fully aware that Josh Hammer is offline for a Jewish holiday, she dedicates an entire episode to claiming he knew Charlie Kirk’s assassination would happen - even suggesting he signalled it in a post the night before. She then cherry-picks “evidence” (the only kind she ever uses) to paint him as a bigot, keeps insisting he’s lying about his conversation with Kirk before he died - with zero proof - all while knowing he was actually posting about Iryna Zarutska, the Ukrainian woman murdered on that bus. It’s a calculated smear - done to get ahead of his response and discredit him while he can’t defend himself. This is as bad-faith and disgusting as it gets. Also… how does it even make sense? Why would anyone “in on” a secret assassination publicly post about it the night before — especially knowing people like Candace exist to twist it?
2:02

This is how vile and disgusting Candace Owens is... Fully aware that Josh Hammer is offline for a Jewish holiday, she dedicates an entire episode to claiming he knew Charlie Kirk’s assassination would happen - even suggesting he signalled it in a post the night before. She then cherry-picks “evidence” (the only kind she ever uses) to paint him as a bigot, keeps insisting he’s lying about his conversation with Kirk before he died - with zero proof - all while knowing he was actually posting about Iryna Zarutska, the Ukrainian woman murdered on that bus. It’s a calculated smear - done to get ahead of his response and discredit him while he can’t defend himself. This is as bad-faith and disgusting as it gets. Also… how does it even make sense? Why would anyone “in on” a secret assassination publicly post about it the night before — especially knowing people like Candace exist to twist it?

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

289,733 views • 10 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Bill Melugin is reporting that President Trump called Sen. John Kennedy furious that Kristi Noem testified the president personally signed off on a $200M ad contract for DHS The ad testimony is being described as the "final" straw "You combine Minnesota, allegations of an affair, testimony on the Hill, it all boiled over into a very sudden replacement of Kristi Noem," Bill Melugin said "It had been brewing for a couple months. It started in Minneapolis." "[Kennedy] asked her repeatedly, 'did President Trump personally approve of this contract to spend $200 million on this ad contract?' And Kristi Noem replied under oath that 'yes, he did.' Well, President Trump is now saying that that is not true." "Kennedy gave us a quote. He says President Trump called him after that hearing, after he saw Noem's testimony and that President Trump was, quote, 'mad as a m*rder hornet' and said that he never approved that contract and didn't even know about it."
3:10

🚨 JUST IN: Bill Melugin is reporting that President Trump called Sen. John Kennedy furious that Kristi Noem testified the president personally signed off on a $200M ad contract for DHS The ad testimony is being described as the "final" straw "You combine Minnesota, allegations of an affair, testimony on the Hill, it all boiled over into a very sudden replacement of Kristi Noem," Bill Melugin said "It had been brewing for a couple months. It started in Minneapolis." "[Kennedy] asked her repeatedly, 'did President Trump personally approve of this contract to spend $200 million on this ad contract?' And Kristi Noem replied under oath that 'yes, he did.' Well, President Trump is now saying that that is not true." "Kennedy gave us a quote. He says President Trump called him after that hearing, after he saw Noem's testimony and that President Trump was, quote, 'mad as a m*rder hornet' and said that he never approved that contract and didn't even know about it."

Eric Daugherty

1,502,192 views • 5 months ago

Joe Rogan Calls Out Bill Gates Corruption - Says Bill Gates is not a philanthropist - He profits off lies - Made a career out of telling lies - “F**king wild” how he profited off the covid vaccines “The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation profited millions of dollars on the vaccines. And then once he dumped the stock, he completely changed his narrative and he started talking about how ineffective the vaccines were and about how the virus wasn't as bad as we thought it was. Like this is f**king wild because this is the same guy that through the entire pandemic was talking about how great these vaccines are and these vaccines are so effective and they stop the virus and all that was a lie and he profited off those lies. Everyone wants to pretend that he's just like this amazing philanthropist. No. He made a lot of money. This is motivated by money and his entire career he's been motivated by money. He's a businessman and in that time his business was the business of telling people things that he's not educated in. Right, He's not a scientist. He's not a medical doctor. This is crazy how transparent it is. You're not even hiding it.”
0:56

Joe Rogan Calls Out Bill Gates Corruption - Says Bill Gates is not a philanthropist - He profits off lies - Made a career out of telling lies - “F**king wild” how he profited off the covid vaccines “The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation profited millions of dollars on the vaccines. And then once he dumped the stock, he completely changed his narrative and he started talking about how ineffective the vaccines were and about how the virus wasn't as bad as we thought it was. Like this is f**king wild because this is the same guy that through the entire pandemic was talking about how great these vaccines are and these vaccines are so effective and they stop the virus and all that was a lie and he profited off those lies. Everyone wants to pretend that he's just like this amazing philanthropist. No. He made a lot of money. This is motivated by money and his entire career he's been motivated by money. He's a businessman and in that time his business was the business of telling people things that he's not educated in. Right, He's not a scientist. He's not a medical doctor. This is crazy how transparent it is. You're not even hiding it.”

Wall Street Apes

37,831 views • 2 years ago

This is EXACTLY why people are DONE with Facebook Marketplace… 📦 She listed a desk for $40. That’s it. Simple. But what followed? Absolute chaos. Her phone starts blowing up “Is this available?” (still up = yes) “What are the dimensions?” (already in the post) “How much?” (…it literally says $40) Then at 4;30 A.M., someone messages: “I’ll pick it up later today.” So she gets everything ready. Cleans it. Moves it. Waits around all day. And then… nothing. Not a message. Not a heads up. Not even a “sorry.” One day passes… then TWO. Still nothing. Just completely ghosted. That’s the part that drives people insane, it’s not even about selling anymore, it’s about people wasting your time like it means nothing. At this point, “$40” turns into hours of frustration. Be real, what’s worse: the nonstop dumb questions, or the people who swear they’re coming and disappear? And how long would YOU wait before blocking them?
1:44

This is EXACTLY why people are DONE with Facebook Marketplace… 📦 She listed a desk for $40. That’s it. Simple. But what followed? Absolute chaos. Her phone starts blowing up “Is this available?” (still up = yes) “What are the dimensions?” (already in the post) “How much?” (…it literally says $40) Then at 4;30 A.M., someone messages: “I’ll pick it up later today.” So she gets everything ready. Cleans it. Moves it. Waits around all day. And then… nothing. Not a message. Not a heads up. Not even a “sorry.” One day passes… then TWO. Still nothing. Just completely ghosted. That’s the part that drives people insane, it’s not even about selling anymore, it’s about people wasting your time like it means nothing. At this point, “$40” turns into hours of frustration. Be real, what’s worse: the nonstop dumb questions, or the people who swear they’re coming and disappear? And how long would YOU wait before blocking them?

Dr. CZ

98,922 views • 4 months ago

Many people have praised VP Harris for her words in support of Israel. I’m sorry, but I don’t share their enthusiasm. All I heard is one big equal sign as if Israel and Hamas are the same. Not only did she compare the two, but the punchline of her talk and the part that got the most applause? Her talking about the suffering of a people that voted and continues to support Hamas. Sorry, this isn’t how an ally speaks. This is how a politician who has to say something positive about Israel so she doesn’t lose Jewish voters speaks. The people of Gaza are suffering? Well, maybe next time they’ll think twice before massacring over a thousand innocent people, but who we kidding? They would do it over and over. After all, the Vice President of the United States of America speaks about their suffering in the same sentence she talks about the innocent hostages. Excuse me if I missed it, but did she mention the fact that hundreds of thousands of innocent Israelis were displaced as a result of Hezbollah’s bombardment of Israel? Did she even mention Hezbollah? Iran? Nope, she did not. Sorry, she is no friend of Israel.
1:23

Many people have praised VP Harris for her words in support of Israel. I’m sorry, but I don’t share their enthusiasm. All I heard is one big equal sign as if Israel and Hamas are the same. Not only did she compare the two, but the punchline of her talk and the part that got the most applause? Her talking about the suffering of a people that voted and continues to support Hamas. Sorry, this isn’t how an ally speaks. This is how a politician who has to say something positive about Israel so she doesn’t lose Jewish voters speaks. The people of Gaza are suffering? Well, maybe next time they’ll think twice before massacring over a thousand innocent people, but who we kidding? They would do it over and over. After all, the Vice President of the United States of America speaks about their suffering in the same sentence she talks about the innocent hostages. Excuse me if I missed it, but did she mention the fact that hundreds of thousands of innocent Israelis were displaced as a result of Hezbollah’s bombardment of Israel? Did she even mention Hezbollah? Iran? Nope, she did not. Sorry, she is no friend of Israel.

Hillel Fuld

258,286 views • 1 year ago

“Courts have stopped the president from defacing the Kennedy Center, but they haven’t stopped him from destroying the Kennedy Center. And the larger fight is over the future of the Kennedy Center. And that fight is surrounding Trump’s plan to close it down for two years and then gut it, and then renovate it, however he sees fit, I’m sure with a lot of gold stuff, right? And that fight is still ongoing.” “And what that means is that after July 4th, there is nothing planned at the Kennedy Center. If you look on the website in the calendar, there’s nothing booked. So, he’s effectively killing the Kennedy Center, even though his name’s not going to be on it, by just not booking anything and not putting anybody in charge of it. And that’s a tragedy for the Kennedy Center. And whatever you thought about the Kennedy Center before, for the next period of time, it’s going to be vacant.” “And that’s Trump’s decision. He would rather kill it out of spite because he didn’t get his way than to let it continue even imperfectly in the way it was operating. That’s very sad for the people who care about the Kennedy Center and the programming that was going on there.”
0:56

“Courts have stopped the president from defacing the Kennedy Center, but they haven’t stopped him from destroying the Kennedy Center. And the larger fight is over the future of the Kennedy Center. And that fight is surrounding Trump’s plan to close it down for two years and then gut it, and then renovate it, however he sees fit, I’m sure with a lot of gold stuff, right? And that fight is still ongoing.” “And what that means is that after July 4th, there is nothing planned at the Kennedy Center. If you look on the website in the calendar, there’s nothing booked. So, he’s effectively killing the Kennedy Center, even though his name’s not going to be on it, by just not booking anything and not putting anybody in charge of it. And that’s a tragedy for the Kennedy Center. And whatever you thought about the Kennedy Center before, for the next period of time, it’s going to be vacant.” “And that’s Trump’s decision. He would rather kill it out of spite because he didn’t get his way than to let it continue even imperfectly in the way it was operating. That’s very sad for the people who care about the Kennedy Center and the programming that was going on there.”

Josh Rogin

28,183 views • 1 month ago

This woman ordered food from a place her dad has never had before. She asks him how his food is and he’s raving about how good his burger is. She then lies to him and tells him that she ordered from a vegan place, and that his burger isn’t made from beef that it’s all vegetables. As soon as he hears that he starts to complain and make claims that it now tastes off to him, that he can tell it’s not real meat. So how did he go from enjoying how good the burger was to then claiming it tastes like baked beans a few moments later, is it the power of suggestion or is it a bias he already had in his own mind?
1:32

This woman ordered food from a place her dad has never had before. She asks him how his food is and he’s raving about how good his burger is. She then lies to him and tells him that she ordered from a vegan place, and that his burger isn’t made from beef that it’s all vegetables. As soon as he hears that he starts to complain and make claims that it now tastes off to him, that he can tell it’s not real meat. So how did he go from enjoying how good the burger was to then claiming it tastes like baked beans a few moments later, is it the power of suggestion or is it a bias he already had in his own mind?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,649,964 views • 3 months ago

Candace Owens tripled down on calling Trump’s assassination attempts fake. She basically says that he stages them for attention and even goes so far as to say it’s become a hobby for him. She goes on to say that she doesn’t care about the details of the latest shooting near the White House but of course she still spins a conspiracy out of it anyway. You would think that after talking about Charlie’s assassination every day for the last 8 months she would know better than to downplay these kind of threats. But of course she doesn’t care if she gets someone hurt in fact I believe thats what she wants. Maybe the reason why she’s so suspicious of other people faking assassination attempts is because she faked her own. Just a guess. 🤷‍♂️
2:16

Candace Owens tripled down on calling Trump’s assassination attempts fake. She basically says that he stages them for attention and even goes so far as to say it’s become a hobby for him. She goes on to say that she doesn’t care about the details of the latest shooting near the White House but of course she still spins a conspiracy out of it anyway. You would think that after talking about Charlie’s assassination every day for the last 8 months she would know better than to downplay these kind of threats. But of course she doesn’t care if she gets someone hurt in fact I believe thats what she wants. Maybe the reason why she’s so suspicious of other people faking assassination attempts is because she faked her own. Just a guess. 🤷‍♂️

Cinema Shogun

22,774 views • 2 months ago

“In Virginia, they had a guy, Jay Jones, running for attorney general, who just a few weeks ago, these texts that he had sent fantasizing about killing a political opponent had resurfaced…And even that bad Democrat candidate won by 6 points. So that tells me that this was a resounding rejection of Donald Trump’s second term and the Republican Party.” Amazing that the women of The View see Jay Jones’ election as an indicator of how bad Republicans are—as opposed to just how bad Democrats are and how their standards are nonexistent. That’s…one way to look at it. Please never lecture us about January 6th again.
1:07

“In Virginia, they had a guy, Jay Jones, running for attorney general, who just a few weeks ago, these texts that he had sent fantasizing about killing a political opponent had resurfaced…And even that bad Democrat candidate won by 6 points. So that tells me that this was a resounding rejection of Donald Trump’s second term and the Republican Party.” Amazing that the women of The View see Jay Jones’ election as an indicator of how bad Republicans are—as opposed to just how bad Democrats are and how their standards are nonexistent. That’s…one way to look at it. Please never lecture us about January 6th again.

Natalie Jean Beisner

98,775 views • 9 months ago

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.
9:25

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Hopewell Chin’ono

67,842 views • 8 months ago

Trying to catch up on the entire interview with Heart Radio but absolutely LOVING the segment of him gushing about Catherine and the children❤️ His entire demeanor and body is very relaxed when he talks about them and you can tell he cherishes and adores them to pieces👌🏽 I love him imitating Catherine asking "Where is my husband?"😚 Of Course he is proud of Catherine, what husband would not be if she were his wife? I LOVE how warm his deep tone is when he speaks of his wife, one can feel there is a lot of love, respect and affection there, especially he talks about her passion for her work, her reading her research in their bedroom and how he was so proud as a husband to watch her shine in Italy ❤️ I especially love that he mentioned how stunning she is and looks. He seldomly talks about her physical appearance but he is very conscious that he married a very beautiful woman and as I watched her so radiant, so incredibly graceful and gorgeous in Italy, I was thinking William must be feeling like a King right now at seeing his beautiful wife glow out there especially after her health journey to get there❤️‍🩹 I laughed at him replying to Holden that "he did not even know Catherine spoke Italian and that she must have dusted it off from somewhere"😅😂 Good girl, she keeps some tricks still hidden and keeps her husband surprised🤭 Finally the most beautiful part is thim saying how " she is an amazing mother and wife and that they could not cope as a family without her and also him wanting to make sure she is alright before she gets back to a grueling international traveling schedule"❤️‍🩹🥹 Indeniably, this man adores his wife and the family they have created and does not take them for granted. On the contrary, he prioritises them, provides for them and protects them as a Good husband should do. In that Catherine lucked out too with William, not because he is the Wealthy Heir, because Diana married the Wealthy Heir too and we saw the result.. No Catherine lucked out because she truly fell in love and married a good man who loves her too, who adores her, respects her and to whom she and her children are the centre of the world. That is one of the greatest blessing in life❤️
1:36

Trying to catch up on the entire interview with Heart Radio but absolutely LOVING the segment of him gushing about Catherine and the children❤️ His entire demeanor and body is very relaxed when he talks about them and you can tell he cherishes and adores them to pieces👌🏽 I love him imitating Catherine asking "Where is my husband?"😚 Of Course he is proud of Catherine, what husband would not be if she were his wife? I LOVE how warm his deep tone is when he speaks of his wife, one can feel there is a lot of love, respect and affection there, especially he talks about her passion for her work, her reading her research in their bedroom and how he was so proud as a husband to watch her shine in Italy ❤️ I especially love that he mentioned how stunning she is and looks. He seldomly talks about her physical appearance but he is very conscious that he married a very beautiful woman and as I watched her so radiant, so incredibly graceful and gorgeous in Italy, I was thinking William must be feeling like a King right now at seeing his beautiful wife glow out there especially after her health journey to get there❤️‍🩹 I laughed at him replying to Holden that "he did not even know Catherine spoke Italian and that she must have dusted it off from somewhere"😅😂 Good girl, she keeps some tricks still hidden and keeps her husband surprised🤭 Finally the most beautiful part is thim saying how " she is an amazing mother and wife and that they could not cope as a family without her and also him wanting to make sure she is alright before she gets back to a grueling international traveling schedule"❤️‍🩹🥹 Indeniably, this man adores his wife and the family they have created and does not take them for granted. On the contrary, he prioritises them, provides for them and protects them as a Good husband should do. In that Catherine lucked out too with William, not because he is the Wealthy Heir, because Diana married the Wealthy Heir too and we saw the result.. No Catherine lucked out because she truly fell in love and married a good man who loves her too, who adores her, respects her and to whom she and her children are the centre of the world. That is one of the greatest blessing in life❤️

Canellecitadelle

68,748 views • 2 months ago

#BREAKING: Velshi: He wrote an entire book about DEI being our weakness, how women were not suited to be in the military. Why are people surprised about Pete Hegseth? Basil Smikle: “…anyone that served in WWII would never say that the Tuskegee Airmen were a waste. They would never say that, and I wonder, could a Colin Powell exist in Hegseth’s army today? He couldn’t…so this isn’t really just about DEI, this is literally an attack on Black people…on women…on people of color…If you don’t like a policy, you can fix a policy, but this is intentional about going after people and taking them out of service…and it is important as you said, that these were senior individuals because the qualifications are unmistakable…and it’s decades of service…”🤔
1:58

#BREAKING: Velshi: He wrote an entire book about DEI being our weakness, how women were not suited to be in the military. Why are people surprised about Pete Hegseth? Basil Smikle: “…anyone that served in WWII would never say that the Tuskegee Airmen were a waste. They would never say that, and I wonder, could a Colin Powell exist in Hegseth’s army today? He couldn’t…so this isn’t really just about DEI, this is literally an attack on Black people…on women…on people of color…If you don’t like a policy, you can fix a policy, but this is intentional about going after people and taking them out of service…and it is important as you said, that these were senior individuals because the qualifications are unmistakable…and it’s decades of service…”🤔

Emoluments Clause

64,461 views • 1 month ago

Bryan Cranston explaining the Breaking Bad scene where he lets Jane die is bone-chilling. It is wild to hear him describe how he prepared for the scene… writing down emotional possibilities and how it backfired in the most terrifying way imaginable. Cranston: "I saw her choking on the vomit and, all of a sudden, her facial features disappeared and it was replaced with the features of my real daughter." He describes that moment where the lines between acting and his own reality as a father blurred, and you can still see him getting choked up just talking about it years later. It’s a perfect example of the extreme emotional risks actors take to get a scene right.
3:15

Bryan Cranston explaining the Breaking Bad scene where he lets Jane die is bone-chilling. It is wild to hear him describe how he prepared for the scene… writing down emotional possibilities and how it backfired in the most terrifying way imaginable. Cranston: "I saw her choking on the vomit and, all of a sudden, her facial features disappeared and it was replaced with the features of my real daughter." He describes that moment where the lines between acting and his own reality as a father blurred, and you can still see him getting choked up just talking about it years later. It’s a perfect example of the extreme emotional risks actors take to get a scene right.

| UCEE |

110,616 views • 20 days ago

“Terrorists, even when they are five, actually do harm, and people take that seriously. So FDLR, why no one would take them seriously, knowing their history, and knowing they are associated with a government in DRC. You have heard of hate speech and all kinds of things. Still, the issue becomes how many would they be? It is falsifying the issue of numbers; they are many, that’s a fact. But the essence of saying how many is like saying you are exaggerating. I have been asked by some leaders of Europe, how many are they likely to be? When somebody asks me that, I know he is interested in covering up the problem. When you talk about FDLR, the resolutions and statements at the UN are like a whisper. It is like Rwanda should not be taking action against them, as if they are not connected with the whole history or their responsibility in what they did here.” President Kagame
2:59

“Terrorists, even when they are five, actually do harm, and people take that seriously. So FDLR, why no one would take them seriously, knowing their history, and knowing they are associated with a government in DRC. You have heard of hate speech and all kinds of things. Still, the issue becomes how many would they be? It is falsifying the issue of numbers; they are many, that’s a fact. But the essence of saying how many is like saying you are exaggerating. I have been asked by some leaders of Europe, how many are they likely to be? When somebody asks me that, I know he is interested in covering up the problem. When you talk about FDLR, the resolutions and statements at the UN are like a whisper. It is like Rwanda should not be taking action against them, as if they are not connected with the whole history or their responsibility in what they did here.” President Kagame

Presidency | Rwanda

42,327 views • 8 months ago