Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This is how you can get programmatic access to any website. You need two things: 1. The URL of the website 2. A prompt specifying what you want to do on the site Mino is a neat platform that uses browser automation and AI-powered navigation to understand your prompt,...

31,731 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

You can easily make an extra $3,000–$5,000/month by selling digital information. With AI, you can do this completely automatically from ideation to content creation to the design of the course itself, using Grok, HeyGen, and Gamma. Here's how you do it: ⤵️ --- Go to Grok and create the course outline and scripts. Simply say, "Hey Grok, I want to create a course about [topic X]. Please create an outline and script for me" and let it do its thing. This gives you the foundation for your entire course without spending hours on research and planning. --- Next, go to HeyGen and create the video using their avatars. Using HeyGen, you can easily create videos for your course using an AI avatar. No need to hire actors or even show your face on camera. The AI handles all the video production while you focus on the bigger picture. --- Then go to Gamma and create a website for your course. Using you can host your course on a domain for free. You can also design it in less than a minute by using a single prompt. Just insert the outline that Grok generated and let it create a beautiful design for you. --- Finally, add the HeyGen videos to the Gamma website. And just like that, you have a course that includes educational information as well as video content that people can consume. Add a paywall behind it and start monetizing it. --- Safe to say that AI is transforming our productivity, and if you're not catching up, you're falling behind. Make sure to save this post and start monetizing by creating digital content.

Mushfiq Sajib

22,621 views • 1 year ago

This is next-level smart: An open-source platform that evaluates your prompts and automatically refines them based on the results. ​ Of course, it feels obvious after you see it: ​ • You write a prompt • The system evaluates it across different scenarios • Based on the results, it refines it to improve results ​ I recorded a quick video to show you how it works. It's pretty cool stuff! ​ Here are some of the problems and best practices for teams building AI applications: ​ 1. Testing your prompts manually doesn't scale 2. Prompts should not be spread throughout the codebase 3. Non-technical people need easy access to your prompts 4. Prompts can always use a version history to track changes 5. Monitoring the performance of prompts overtime is critical ​ Evaluating the prompts is what keeps me up at night from this list. Of all the conversations I've had with companies and people building AI applications, this is the area that's causing the most pain. ​ Testing a prompt is difficult. Think about how you'd test the response of a model subjectively. What do you account for, "tone," "objectivity," "completeness," "creativity," "readability," etc.? ​ Last week, I met the developers behind Latitude, an open-source prompt engineering platform trying to solve all of these issues. You can try the platform in two ways: ​ • You can self-host the platform. Free and open-source. • If you want to try their online product, their free tier is huge. ​ Here is the link: ​ Thanks to the Latitude team for collaborating with me on this post, and congratulations on going live with their product!

Santiago

64,141 views • 1 year ago

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 views • 3 months ago