Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

This is huge development As per NBC News, The Pentagon is reportedly drafting a classified nuclear strategy that would place greater emphasis on the potential use of shorter-range tactical nuclear weapons in the event of a regional conflict involving China or Russia.

Baba Banaras™

175,451 subscribers

12,106 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 U.S. nuclear doctrine is shifting toward a new battlefield era The Pentagon is preparing a new classified nuclear strategy that could expand Washington’s options during a major regional conflict. The plan reportedly places greater focus on tactical nuclear weapons, including the potential use of tactical nukes in limited conflict scenarios rather than a full scale nuclear exchange. As global tensions rise, nuclear powers are reassessing deterrence, escalation, and the future of warfare. A new chapter in the nuclear age may be emerging… and the world is watching closely.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 U.S. nuclear doctrine is shifting toward a new battlefield era The Pentagon is preparing a new classified nuclear strategy that could expand Washington’s options during a major regional conflict. The plan reportedly places greater focus on tactical nuclear weapons, including the potential use of tactical nukes in limited conflict scenarios rather than a full scale nuclear exchange. As global tensions rise, nuclear powers are reassessing deterrence, escalation, and the future of warfare. A new chapter in the nuclear age may be emerging… and the world is watching closely.

War Radar

18,375 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons ONCE AGAIN – Mrs. Leyen Strictly speaking, she is right. The US had used nuclear bombs in Japan, and Russia said they would respond with nuclear weapons if the US used them first. As such, Russia would use nuclear weapons for the first time, but the word “again” is correct, for mankind, if you count Hiroshima. In summary, she is playing with words, insinuating that Russia had used the bombs before. A thoroughly unpleasant and devious person.

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons ONCE AGAIN – Mrs. Leyen Strictly speaking, she is right. The US had used nuclear bombs in Japan, and Russia said they would respond with nuclear weapons if the US used them first. As such, Russia would use nuclear weapons for the first time, but the word “again” is correct, for mankind, if you count Hiroshima. In summary, she is playing with words, insinuating that Russia had used the bombs before. A thoroughly unpleasant and devious person.

Alternative News

26,085 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

🔥 This is probably the type of conversation going on inside the Pentagon: 🇺🇸 Trump: “Can we use tactical nuclear weapons on Iran?” 🇺🇸 Pete Hegseth: “Yes, we can. That would completely change the situation.” 🇺🇸 General Dan: “We can’t use tactical nuclear weapons on Iran.” 🇺🇸 Trump: “Why?” 🇺🇸 General Dan: “It would make the situation even worse. Iran didn’t develop nuclear weapons just to sit back and watch them be used against them.” 🇺🇸 Trump: “Then what do we do?” ....................................................... Trump has no options left. He is trapped in this war. 😂🔥

🔥 This is probably the type of conversation going on inside the Pentagon: 🇺🇸 Trump: “Can we use tactical nuclear weapons on Iran?” 🇺🇸 Pete Hegseth: “Yes, we can. That would completely change the situation.” 🇺🇸 General Dan: “We can’t use tactical nuclear weapons on Iran.” 🇺🇸 Trump: “Why?” 🇺🇸 General Dan: “It would make the situation even worse. Iran didn’t develop nuclear weapons just to sit back and watch them be used against them.” 🇺🇸 Trump: “Then what do we do?” ....................................................... Trump has no options left. He is trapped in this war. 😂🔥

Robert Bruce

124,143 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

🇷🇺 ☢️ Russian nationalist leader and former political prisoner Dmitry Demushkin admits in an interview that Russia, which has tried all kinds of weapons against Ukraine and still has not achieved success, will not use nuclear weapons either: 📌 “A part of our Z-society believes that the authorities still have unused cards hidden up their sleeves. In reality, in the current war we have tried and used everything we could use, except for nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.” 📌 “There are calls to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine — those people do not understand that nuclear weapons are not a means of waging war, but a tool of deterrence.” 🔻 “Even if we use tactical nuclear weapons, this will not radically change our situation, because there is no such concentration of Ukrainian troops anywhere on the front that a nuclear explosion would cause critical damage.” 🔻 “We will have very big problems after using nuclear weapons. We will finally turn into lepers on the international stage. For example, when China stops selling us drone engines and everything else, what will we do then?” 🔻 “And finally, talking about using nuclear weapons is another manifestation of our weakness. Meaning, we have tried everything else and nothing has worked.” Video is generated by Grok AI

🇷🇺 ☢️ Russian nationalist leader and former political prisoner Dmitry Demushkin admits in an interview that Russia, which has tried all kinds of weapons against Ukraine and still has not achieved success, will not use nuclear weapons either: 📌 “A part of our Z-society believes that the authorities still have unused cards hidden up their sleeves. In reality, in the current war we have tried and used everything we could use, except for nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.” 📌 “There are calls to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine — those people do not understand that nuclear weapons are not a means of waging war, but a tool of deterrence.” 🔻 “Even if we use tactical nuclear weapons, this will not radically change our situation, because there is no such concentration of Ukrainian troops anywhere on the front that a nuclear explosion would cause critical damage.” 🔻 “We will have very big problems after using nuclear weapons. We will finally turn into lepers on the international stage. For example, when China stops selling us drone engines and everything else, what will we do then?” 🔻 “And finally, talking about using nuclear weapons is another manifestation of our weakness. Meaning, we have tried everything else and nothing has worked.” Video is generated by Grok AI

NSTRIKE

163,791 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Russia issues a stark warning to Japan. The Russian Foreign Ministry says any Japanese use of nuclear weapons would trigger a severe response from several neighboring countries. this marks one of Moscow's strongest nuclear warnings toward Japan in recent years.

Russia issues a stark warning to Japan. The Russian Foreign Ministry says any Japanese use of nuclear weapons would trigger a severe response from several neighboring countries. this marks one of Moscow's strongest nuclear warnings toward Japan in recent years.

China pulse 🇨🇳

12,718 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The use of the hypersonic non-nuclear Oreshnik missile provides Russia with a useable card that NATO lacks in an escalation game. The message would have been received by all military planners in NATO and in the US. The missile was reportedly used last night to destroy a major gas storage facility in Lviv in western Ukraine. The real value of the missile is its ability to destroy well protected command & control facilities and other critical infrastructure without resorting to the use of nuclear weapons.

The use of the hypersonic non-nuclear Oreshnik missile provides Russia with a useable card that NATO lacks in an escalation game. The message would have been received by all military planners in NATO and in the US. The missile was reportedly used last night to destroy a major gas storage facility in Lviv in western Ukraine. The real value of the missile is its ability to destroy well protected command & control facilities and other critical infrastructure without resorting to the use of nuclear weapons.

Zorawar Daulet Singh

99,055 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, issued a bombshell warning that Russia would use non-strategic nuclear weapons against Ukraine and potentially the UK and France if Western nuclear tech is transferred to Kyiv, citing SVR claims via TASS.

🚨 JUST IN: Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, issued a bombshell warning that Russia would use non-strategic nuclear weapons against Ukraine and potentially the UK and France if Western nuclear tech is transferred to Kyiv, citing SVR claims via TASS.

WORLD NEWS

5,375,950 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Director General of the IAEA, UN nuclear chief Rafael Grossi: “We don’t see a structured program to manufacture nuclear weapons [in Iran]. So that is the assessment.” This is Iraq all over again! "Weapons of Mass Destruction" They don't exist

Director General of the IAEA, UN nuclear chief Rafael Grossi: “We don’t see a structured program to manufacture nuclear weapons [in Iran]. So that is the assessment.” This is Iraq all over again! "Weapons of Mass Destruction" They don't exist

Ed Krassenstein

114,259 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸🇺🇦 WSJ: Trump is weighing lifting restrictions on Ukraine’s use of U.S.-made long-range weapons — potentially allowing strikes deep inside Russia. A move that could dramatically escalate the conflict.

🚨🇺🇸🇺🇦 WSJ: Trump is weighing lifting restrictions on Ukraine’s use of U.S.-made long-range weapons — potentially allowing strikes deep inside Russia. A move that could dramatically escalate the conflict.

Defence Index

80,047 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Well it's Groundhog Day, again, and that must mean that Russia is threatening to use nukes. This time, it's the chairman of the Duma demanding the use of "weapons of retribution" for a war THEY started. And if Putin sees his shadow, that means 6 more weeks of nuclear winter.🌨️

Well it's Groundhog Day, again, and that must mean that Russia is threatening to use nukes. This time, it's the chairman of the Duma demanding the use of "weapons of retribution" for a war THEY started. And if Putin sees his shadow, that means 6 more weeks of nuclear winter.🌨️

Maria Drutska 🇺🇦

10,607 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Dnipro, an ordinary city in Ukraine, became the center of another alarming event overnight. Russia reportedly launched an intercontinental ballistic missile, likely the RS-26 "Rubezh," weighing 40-50 tons. This missile is primarily designed to carry nuclear warheads. The attack appears to be part of a broader strategy of "power demonstration" and psychological pressure against Ukraine and its people. The use of such a weapon, even without its nuclear payload, escalates fears and highlights the ongoing risks faced by civilian populations amid the war.

Dnipro, an ordinary city in Ukraine, became the center of another alarming event overnight. Russia reportedly launched an intercontinental ballistic missile, likely the RS-26 "Rubezh," weighing 40-50 tons. This missile is primarily designed to carry nuclear warheads. The attack appears to be part of a broader strategy of "power demonstration" and psychological pressure against Ukraine and its people. The use of such a weapon, even without its nuclear payload, escalates fears and highlights the ongoing risks faced by civilian populations amid the war.

Ihor Lachenkov

2,721,155 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

SHOCKING 😳 🇷🇺Russian official just OFFICIALLY threatened Finland 🇫🇮 “We can capture HALF of Finland in just a few days!” 🇷🇺Russia said, listen carefully… Don’t dare to deploy nuclear weapons in Finland! 🇷🇺Russia is furious that Finland lifted the ban on nuclear weapons. They are rushing even MORE troops to the border right now 🤯

SHOCKING 😳 🇷🇺Russian official just OFFICIALLY threatened Finland 🇫🇮 “We can capture HALF of Finland in just a few days!” 🇷🇺Russia said, listen carefully… Don’t dare to deploy nuclear weapons in Finland! 🇷🇺Russia is furious that Finland lifted the ban on nuclear weapons. They are rushing even MORE troops to the border right now 🤯

World updates

67,781 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BREAKING : Another setback for Iran's Nuclear weapons development program. Senior Iranian scientist Dr. Dariush Navid Ali killed in a targeted attack in Karaj, Iran. He was one of the main faces of Islamic regime's secret nuclear weapons development program.

BREAKING : Another setback for Iran's Nuclear weapons development program. Senior Iranian scientist Dr. Dariush Navid Ali killed in a targeted attack in Karaj, Iran. He was one of the main faces of Islamic regime's secret nuclear weapons development program.

Baba Banaras™

169,161 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Another delusionist insults Russia and tries to convince the devastated Ukrainians that "they are winning" This time its Petr Pavel from Czechia. "Russia is a weak country with lots of nuclear weapons"

Another delusionist insults Russia and tries to convince the devastated Ukrainians that "they are winning" This time its Petr Pavel from Czechia. "Russia is a weak country with lots of nuclear weapons"

Chay Bowes

15,314 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

US intelligence assessed just weeks ago that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon “The IC [Intelligence Community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003. The IC is monitoring if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program.” - Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, 25 March 2025

US intelligence assessed just weeks ago that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon “The IC [Intelligence Community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003. The IC is monitoring if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program.” - Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, 25 March 2025

WikiLeaks

3,484,888 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Post by U.S. President Donald Trump after the U.S. Air Force targeted and destroyed a uranium enrichment and nuclear weapons development facility of the Islamic regime of Iran in Isfahan. This is the mood of the world today. The world is safer today.

Post by U.S. President Donald Trump after the U.S. Air Force targeted and destroyed a uranium enrichment and nuclear weapons development facility of the Islamic regime of Iran in Isfahan. This is the mood of the world today. The world is safer today.

Baba Banaras™

31,887 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

On the Oreshnik and the eternal question about the warhead There is a particular type of commentator who, after every Oreshnik strike, routinely asks the same question. Was there even a warhead in it this time? The question is meant to suggest that the weapon, without a classical explosive payload, is somehow fake or less dangerous. What it really reveals is that the person asking does not understand how the system works. A conventional ballistic missile carries explosives or a nuclear warhead. The destruction comes from the detonation at the target. The missile is essentially the delivery service. The Oreshnik works differently. It is an intermediate-range missile (range around 5000 kilometers) carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). These reentry vehicles enter the atmosphere at roughly Mach 10 to Mach 12, with Russian sources claiming higher in some cases. That works out to 3 to 3.5 kilometers per second on terminal approach. This is where the physics comes in. Kinetic energy is calculated as E = 0.5 times mass times velocity squared. Velocity enters the equation as a square. A reentry vehicle of a few hundred kilograms, on impact alone, releases energy in the range of several tons of TNT equivalent. With multiple submunitions per missile, that adds up. A tungsten or steel core entering the ground at this speed produces temperatures of several thousand degrees through friction and compression shock. Bunkers and hardened installations are not destroyed by an explosion, they are destroyed by the sheer force and heat of the impact itself. The technical term is kinetic penetration. Now to the actual answer for the warhead-askers. Yes, the Oreshnik is nuclear-capable. This was part of the design from the start, not a retrofit, but a built-in configuration option. Russian officials have stated this openly. The carrier is there. The only question is what it carries. But that is exactly the point the warhead-asker skips over. The whole point of the Oreshnik is that even in its conventional configuration it achieves an effect that previously required nuclear weapons against hardened targets. To destroy an underground command bunker, historically you needed a small tactical nuclear weapon. Today a reentry vehicle at Mach 10 with a few hundred kilograms of mass is enough. No radioactive fallout, no crossing of the nuclear threshold, no political price attached to a nuclear use. In a strike on a major city, the nuclear configuration would, in this conflict, almost certainly not be deployed. Not because it does not exist, but because it is neither necessary nor politically tenable for that purpose. The conventional version is sufficient to send a message without crossing the threshold above which entirely different chains of escalation are set in motion. In short. The question "was there a warhead in it?" misses the point. The Oreshnik does not need a large warhead, because its velocity is the weapon. It can carry a nuclear warhead, at any time. It just does not do so in the current conflict, because it does not have to.

On the Oreshnik and the eternal question about the warhead There is a particular type of commentator who, after every Oreshnik strike, routinely asks the same question. Was there even a warhead in it this time? The question is meant to suggest that the weapon, without a classical explosive payload, is somehow fake or less dangerous. What it really reveals is that the person asking does not understand how the system works. A conventional ballistic missile carries explosives or a nuclear warhead. The destruction comes from the detonation at the target. The missile is essentially the delivery service. The Oreshnik works differently. It is an intermediate-range missile (range around 5000 kilometers) carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). These reentry vehicles enter the atmosphere at roughly Mach 10 to Mach 12, with Russian sources claiming higher in some cases. That works out to 3 to 3.5 kilometers per second on terminal approach. This is where the physics comes in. Kinetic energy is calculated as E = 0.5 times mass times velocity squared. Velocity enters the equation as a square. A reentry vehicle of a few hundred kilograms, on impact alone, releases energy in the range of several tons of TNT equivalent. With multiple submunitions per missile, that adds up. A tungsten or steel core entering the ground at this speed produces temperatures of several thousand degrees through friction and compression shock. Bunkers and hardened installations are not destroyed by an explosion, they are destroyed by the sheer force and heat of the impact itself. The technical term is kinetic penetration. Now to the actual answer for the warhead-askers. Yes, the Oreshnik is nuclear-capable. This was part of the design from the start, not a retrofit, but a built-in configuration option. Russian officials have stated this openly. The carrier is there. The only question is what it carries. But that is exactly the point the warhead-asker skips over. The whole point of the Oreshnik is that even in its conventional configuration it achieves an effect that previously required nuclear weapons against hardened targets. To destroy an underground command bunker, historically you needed a small tactical nuclear weapon. Today a reentry vehicle at Mach 10 with a few hundred kilograms of mass is enough. No radioactive fallout, no crossing of the nuclear threshold, no political price attached to a nuclear use. In a strike on a major city, the nuclear configuration would, in this conflict, almost certainly not be deployed. Not because it does not exist, but because it is neither necessary nor politically tenable for that purpose. The conventional version is sufficient to send a message without crossing the threshold above which entirely different chains of escalation are set in motion. In short. The question "was there a warhead in it?" misses the point. The Oreshnik does not need a large warhead, because its velocity is the weapon. It can carry a nuclear warhead, at any time. It just does not do so in the current conflict, because it does not have to.

Zlatti71

36,837 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Russia claims it has conducted a test of a new nuclear-tied cruise missile, the Burevestnik, on October 21. According to Gerasimov, the missile flew 14,000 km and showed it was capable of bypassing the air defense system. Putin called Russia's nuclear forces "the most powerful in the world" and said Russia will "continue developing its strategic capabilities." The Burevestnik missile belongs to the category of nuclear-powered missiles and has a virtually unlimited range. Its tests have repeatedly caused concern in NATO because of the potential dangers of radioactive contamination.

Russia claims it has conducted a test of a new nuclear-tied cruise missile, the Burevestnik, on October 21. According to Gerasimov, the missile flew 14,000 km and showed it was capable of bypassing the air defense system. Putin called Russia's nuclear forces "the most powerful in the world" and said Russia will "continue developing its strategic capabilities." The Burevestnik missile belongs to the category of nuclear-powered missiles and has a virtually unlimited range. Its tests have repeatedly caused concern in NATO because of the potential dangers of radioactive contamination.

Anton Gerashchenko

391,703 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The earthquake that occurred in Japan with a magnitude of 9.1 was on March 11, 2011. This devastating event, also known as the Great East Japan Earthquake or the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, caused widespread damage and triggered a massive tsunami that led to a nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.

The earthquake that occurred in Japan with a magnitude of 9.1 was on March 11, 2011. This devastating event, also known as the Great East Japan Earthquake or the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, caused widespread damage and triggered a massive tsunami that led to a nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.

Historic Vids

13,159,418 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren