Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This is Insane. OSHA Being Exposed That Their Plan Really Was To Forced 84 Million Americans To Get The COVID Vaccine Or Be Terminated From Employment “I want to know if you believe that OSHA actually has the power to force 84 million Americans to do that. Well, the...

WallStreetApes's profile picture

Wall Street Apes

1,366,356 subscribers

514,072 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Smurf ❌'s profile picture
Smurf ❌2 years ago

OSHA, does not have the powers to do this. Our government is out of control.

TiredOfTyranny061's profile picture
TiredOfTyranny0612 years ago

I remember listening to the SCOTUS hearing live. If this decision went the other way, we really would have lost our freedom. The fact that they allowed the health “care” “businesses” to still enforce it was still bad though.

Pat1776's profile picture
Pat17762 years ago

None of these agencies (i.e., OSHA, CDC, FDA, CIA,FBI, etc.) have the authority to infringe on our constitutional freedoms and can only issue rules within the framework given them by Congress. The same is true with anyone in the executive and judicial branches, their authority is defined by the constitution.

Åkerlapp's profile picture
Åkerlapp2 years ago

@BengtGLarsson3 Is he still free?

Delbeezee 🐍's profile picture
Delbeezee 🐍2 years ago

I know people that were fired from their job

FormerFeds.Org's profile picture
FormerFeds.Org2 years ago

Pure evil. Should all be terminated.

contro's profile picture
contro2 years ago

DEFUND OSHA

LuckyLadyFox9 🍀🦊's profile picture
LuckyLadyFox9 🍀🦊2 years ago

This is true. Scum suckers. Every facet of work life was used in their deadly coercions. 😡

Dog Walker 🍊's profile picture
Dog Walker 🍊2 years ago

Post his home address

Joe's profile picture
Joe2 years ago

Some people believe that OSHA exceeded its authority by issuing such a broad mandate. They argue that OSHA should only be able to regulate specific workplace hazards, and that the vaccine mandate is too broad and covers too many different types of workplaces. Others believe that OSHA has the authority to issue emergency rules in the interest of public health. They argue that the COVID-19 pandemic is a public health emergency, and that OSHA has the authority to take steps to protect workers from the risks of COVID-19.

Related Videos

"So you do support the Senate, the Supreme Court, and and the existence of prisons?" Francesca Hong: "Yes, I support all of those things right now that are helping to ensure that there is public safety. But I do believe now in our Supreme Court that we should be working to expand the court."
2:02

"So you do support the Senate, the Supreme Court, and and the existence of prisons?" Francesca Hong: "Yes, I support all of those things right now that are helping to ensure that there is public safety. But I do believe now in our Supreme Court that we should be working to expand the court."

Kaitlan Collins

211,671 views • 16 days ago

#BREAKING: Velshi: “…to understand what’s really happening in that courtroom, you have to understand what the 14th amendment actually did do to this country, not the textbook version, the REAL version, because before the 14th amendment, the Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott decision, that Black Americans could never be citizens. That the constitution was not written for them. That they were permanent outsiders…the 14th amendment REVERSED that. It said if you were born here, you are one of us. It stripped states of the power to decide who counts, and placed that decision in the constitution itself, beyond the reach of any governor, or any legislature, or any president with a pen and an executive order.”🤔
2:34

#BREAKING: Velshi: “…to understand what’s really happening in that courtroom, you have to understand what the 14th amendment actually did do to this country, not the textbook version, the REAL version, because before the 14th amendment, the Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott decision, that Black Americans could never be citizens. That the constitution was not written for them. That they were permanent outsiders…the 14th amendment REVERSED that. It said if you were born here, you are one of us. It stripped states of the power to decide who counts, and placed that decision in the constitution itself, beyond the reach of any governor, or any legislature, or any president with a pen and an executive order.”🤔

Emoluments Clause

66,426 views • 4 months ago

The Biden Administration is rewriting the history of COVID. Today, the head of OSHA claimed "we didn't demand that anyone be fired" despite issuing a worker vaccine mandate for 84 million Americans that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Previously, HHS Secretary Becerra claimed "we didn't force anyone to do anything" despite imposing a toddler mask mandate and Education Secretary Cardona baldly denied his past support for student vaccine mandates.
1:56

The Biden Administration is rewriting the history of COVID. Today, the head of OSHA claimed "we didn't demand that anyone be fired" despite issuing a worker vaccine mandate for 84 million Americans that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Previously, HHS Secretary Becerra claimed "we didn't force anyone to do anything" despite imposing a toddler mask mandate and Education Secretary Cardona baldly denied his past support for student vaccine mandates.

Kevin Kiley

1,465,372 views • 2 years ago

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance NAILS IT on the Supreme Court birthright citizenship ruling "The fact that this case was a 5-4 decision effectively means that the concept of birthright citizenship, which is an absurdity to the 14th amendment, that concept is hanging by a THREAD." "And so what I take from that is, yes, we've got to fix the immigration system even more. We have to be even more aware of who's coming into our country to make sure that they're not benefiting from this atrocious Supreme Court ruling, but it also means that we have to keep fighting!" "Because we actually have an opportunity to reverse this decision just as we reverse so many bad decisions throughout the generations."
1:28

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance NAILS IT on the Supreme Court birthright citizenship ruling "The fact that this case was a 5-4 decision effectively means that the concept of birthright citizenship, which is an absurdity to the 14th amendment, that concept is hanging by a THREAD." "And so what I take from that is, yes, we've got to fix the immigration system even more. We have to be even more aware of who's coming into our country to make sure that they're not benefiting from this atrocious Supreme Court ruling, but it also means that we have to keep fighting!" "Because we actually have an opportunity to reverse this decision just as we reverse so many bad decisions throughout the generations."

Eric Daugherty

425,391 views • 1 month ago

MacCallum: What do you think The White House should do in this situation? Gowdy: I think what they ought to do is probably follow the judge’s order and the supreme court decision which used the word facilitate. Also on that opinion, the words accidental, mistake and illegal. Those are not three good words you want in a supreme court decision.. the president may not agree with that but bring him back and remove him to another country but what we can't have is any executive disobeying or not following a judge's decision
1:24

MacCallum: What do you think The White House should do in this situation? Gowdy: I think what they ought to do is probably follow the judge’s order and the supreme court decision which used the word facilitate. Also on that opinion, the words accidental, mistake and illegal. Those are not three good words you want in a supreme court decision.. the president may not agree with that but bring him back and remove him to another country but what we can't have is any executive disobeying or not following a judge's decision

Acyn

1,112,434 views • 1 year ago

.Elon Musk: “I'm not anti-vaccine, but I'm anti-forcing people to take a vaccine, that's for sure.” COLLEGE STUDENT: “Well, also the COVID vaccine did not work.” Elon Musk: “Yeah. And suppressing information about it and side effects; that was terrible. The Biden-Harris administration tried to mandate that any company that has any federal contracts, which is most companies, would be forced to vaccinate everyone at the company or that person would have to be fired. Now thankfully, that was shot down by the Supreme Court. But that's insane. That is a massive infringement on your liberty.”
0:59

.Elon Musk: “I'm not anti-vaccine, but I'm anti-forcing people to take a vaccine, that's for sure.” COLLEGE STUDENT: “Well, also the COVID vaccine did not work.” Elon Musk: “Yeah. And suppressing information about it and side effects; that was terrible. The Biden-Harris administration tried to mandate that any company that has any federal contracts, which is most companies, would be forced to vaccinate everyone at the company or that person would have to be fired. Now thankfully, that was shot down by the Supreme Court. But that's insane. That is a massive infringement on your liberty.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,913,032 views • 1 year ago

One common strategy used by both husbands and wives in Matrimonial disputes is to conceal their income and assets from the court. This happens despite the Supreme Court's clear directive in Rajnesh vs. Neha regarding mandatory disclosure of nancial details. So, what can you do if you’re convinced your spouse is hiding their assets or income? First, understand that the court won’t take the initiative to investigate this on its own. Courts are already overwhelmed with hundreds of cases daily. It falls upon you to take action. So, It's your responsibility to le application after application in writing before the court and not just rely on oral arguments. You need to show the court that there's a strong reason to believe, if not certainty, that your spouse is hiding assets or income. Keep pushing the court to compel your spouse to disclose everything so that a fair order can be made. #divorcelaw #divorce #divorcelawyer
0:52

One common strategy used by both husbands and wives in Matrimonial disputes is to conceal their income and assets from the court. This happens despite the Supreme Court's clear directive in Rajnesh vs. Neha regarding mandatory disclosure of nancial details. So, what can you do if you’re convinced your spouse is hiding their assets or income? First, understand that the court won’t take the initiative to investigate this on its own. Courts are already overwhelmed with hundreds of cases daily. It falls upon you to take action. So, It's your responsibility to le application after application in writing before the court and not just rely on oral arguments. You need to show the court that there's a strong reason to believe, if not certainty, that your spouse is hiding assets or income. Keep pushing the court to compel your spouse to disclose everything so that a fair order can be made. #divorcelaw #divorce #divorcelawyer

Amish Aggarwala

43,641 views • 1 year ago

🚨 NOW: Temu Obama and Democrats just got MIC DROPPED after they broke into a frenzy when the Supreme Court struck down their cheating ARI FLEISCHER: "Republicans for DECADES lived with federal Supreme Court rulings that they didn't like—Roe v. Wade, the Warren Court, measures on crime that made it easier to protect criminals than to protect victims of crime." "And Republicans didn't say, we need to jerry-rig the Supreme Court!" "They didn't go out and say, we need to expand or pack the Supreme Court!" "They worked within the system to change the way things worked." "That's what you have to do here. The Democrats in their now attempt to erase the existence of a Virginia Supreme Court show that they refuse to work within the system. Republicans proved we will listen to a court ruling. Democrats are showing they won't." This is why we need to PLAY HARDBALL, and NEVER let them obtain power!
0:52

🚨 NOW: Temu Obama and Democrats just got MIC DROPPED after they broke into a frenzy when the Supreme Court struck down their cheating ARI FLEISCHER: "Republicans for DECADES lived with federal Supreme Court rulings that they didn't like—Roe v. Wade, the Warren Court, measures on crime that made it easier to protect criminals than to protect victims of crime." "And Republicans didn't say, we need to jerry-rig the Supreme Court!" "They didn't go out and say, we need to expand or pack the Supreme Court!" "They worked within the system to change the way things worked." "That's what you have to do here. The Democrats in their now attempt to erase the existence of a Virginia Supreme Court show that they refuse to work within the system. Republicans proved we will listen to a court ruling. Democrats are showing they won't." This is why we need to PLAY HARDBALL, and NEVER let them obtain power!

Eric Daugherty

106,602 views • 3 months ago

"You get instant gratification from making progress in the way that people think progress is made. You don't get instant gratification from being like, "I think you're wrong, and I know the business better than you do, and really I need to go do this other thing, but that's gonna take me six months to prove you wrong." That takes a lot of conviction and a lot of discipline to be able to do that." Put the blinders on and ignore the noise.
0:45

"You get instant gratification from making progress in the way that people think progress is made. You don't get instant gratification from being like, "I think you're wrong, and I know the business better than you do, and really I need to go do this other thing, but that's gonna take me six months to prove you wrong." That takes a lot of conviction and a lot of discipline to be able to do that." Put the blinders on and ignore the noise.

Shane Parrish

105,818 views • 3 months ago

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just took a huge step towards restoring medical freedom. Last year, a federal court quietly delivered one of the most terrifying rulings ever. 99% of people didn’t notice. They said the government can force ANY medical intervention on you. With no evidence. No judicial review. The Ninth Circuit Court in California ruled against our organization, California Educators for Medical Freedom and several named plaintiffs in our lawsuit against the Los Angeles Unified School District over their Covid-19 vaccine mandate. The Court ruled that as long as authorities say a mandate is for “public health,” courts shouldn’t question them. They said it didn’t matter whether the Covid shots actually worked. All that mattered was that authorities said it did. “This opens the door to virtually limitless government power to mandate medical interventions in our lives.” But we fought back. In December, we petitioned the Supreme Court to review this dangerous and unprecedented ruling. And today, the Supreme Court responded. Our President Leslie Manookian just broke down their response and why it matters: “Just today, we got a notice from the Supreme Court that the Court has issued what’s called a ‘call for response’ to the Los Angeles Unified School District.” “The school district mandated that all [employees] take the Covid shot, and denied accommodation for their religious exemptions.” “They fired or displaced over a thousand employees.” “The School District waived its right to respond to our petition that we filed with the Supreme Court on December 29, 2025 requesting review.” Today, “the court has issued a call for response to the School District, ordering them to respond to our petition.” “Court watchers say that this increases our chances of being accepted by the Supreme Court for review.” “This case is of supreme importance, and I’m thrilled to hear this latest development.” “I believe this case … will make history.” Stay tuned. Follow Health Freedom Defense Fund
3:18

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just took a huge step towards restoring medical freedom. Last year, a federal court quietly delivered one of the most terrifying rulings ever. 99% of people didn’t notice. They said the government can force ANY medical intervention on you. With no evidence. No judicial review. The Ninth Circuit Court in California ruled against our organization, California Educators for Medical Freedom and several named plaintiffs in our lawsuit against the Los Angeles Unified School District over their Covid-19 vaccine mandate. The Court ruled that as long as authorities say a mandate is for “public health,” courts shouldn’t question them. They said it didn’t matter whether the Covid shots actually worked. All that mattered was that authorities said it did. “This opens the door to virtually limitless government power to mandate medical interventions in our lives.” But we fought back. In December, we petitioned the Supreme Court to review this dangerous and unprecedented ruling. And today, the Supreme Court responded. Our President Leslie Manookian just broke down their response and why it matters: “Just today, we got a notice from the Supreme Court that the Court has issued what’s called a ‘call for response’ to the Los Angeles Unified School District.” “The school district mandated that all [employees] take the Covid shot, and denied accommodation for their religious exemptions.” “They fired or displaced over a thousand employees.” “The School District waived its right to respond to our petition that we filed with the Supreme Court on December 29, 2025 requesting review.” Today, “the court has issued a call for response to the School District, ordering them to respond to our petition.” “Court watchers say that this increases our chances of being accepted by the Supreme Court for review.” “This case is of supreme importance, and I’m thrilled to hear this latest development.” “I believe this case … will make history.” Stay tuned. Follow Health Freedom Defense Fund

Health Freedom Defense Fund

143,184 views • 6 months ago

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna state that some UAPs and the technology is NOT made by mankind. The problem we have is that we give private companies this technology so our own elected officials can't oversee or even know what's really going on. But, some members in our government DO know and have access. How is it ok to give tech, whether created by mankind or not, to private companies so an elite group of people keep full control over it? What if it eliminates the use for gas or oil? Are you starting to understand? Also, do you believe that they wouldn't fully take advantage of this tech in multiple ways? Since we know there is a "non-human" presence, but we don't know exactly what that presence is, do you really believe they wouldn't take advantage of that, or could potentially "pose" as that "presence" and pretend it's a threat to push an agenda? These are the things you need to start asking yourself and understand that, yes, there are many elites sitting on tech and physics that they do NOT want us to have. The million dollar question becomes, "What exactly are we going to do about this, and how do we fix this for all of mankind?"
1:19

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna state that some UAPs and the technology is NOT made by mankind. The problem we have is that we give private companies this technology so our own elected officials can't oversee or even know what's really going on. But, some members in our government DO know and have access. How is it ok to give tech, whether created by mankind or not, to private companies so an elite group of people keep full control over it? What if it eliminates the use for gas or oil? Are you starting to understand? Also, do you believe that they wouldn't fully take advantage of this tech in multiple ways? Since we know there is a "non-human" presence, but we don't know exactly what that presence is, do you really believe they wouldn't take advantage of that, or could potentially "pose" as that "presence" and pretend it's a threat to push an agenda? These are the things you need to start asking yourself and understand that, yes, there are many elites sitting on tech and physics that they do NOT want us to have. The million dollar question becomes, "What exactly are we going to do about this, and how do we fix this for all of mankind?"

The SCIF

20,292 views • 6 months ago

Jordan: 77 million of them voted for the guy.. told us he was going to do the things he is doing and you have a judge in Timbuktu, California who could do an order or an injunction and stop that. That is not how our system is supposed to work.
0:30

Jordan: 77 million of them voted for the guy.. told us he was going to do the things he is doing and you have a judge in Timbuktu, California who could do an order or an injunction and stop that. That is not how our system is supposed to work.

Acyn

1,557,953 views • 1 year ago

And when the U.S. Supreme Court said that you could detain people based on their race, their accent, or the language they spoke — when you said that ICE could do that, there is nothing to preclude ICE from doing that while you’re standing in line getting ready to cast a ballot. Stacey Abrams Voting-rights expert
0:59

And when the U.S. Supreme Court said that you could detain people based on their race, their accent, or the language they spoke — when you said that ICE could do that, there is nothing to preclude ICE from doing that while you’re standing in line getting ready to cast a ballot. Stacey Abrams Voting-rights expert

Christopher Webb

23,997 views • 6 months ago

SANDERS: The CDC director was fired for failing to approve Sec. Kennedy's anti-vaccine agenda. If confirmed, will you commit to report to Congress if you receive directives from Kennedy to implement unscientific and harmful policies? SCHWARTZ: I do not believe that the president or secretary would ever do that SANDERS: Really? You think that's the record? He would not do that? That's what you're saying?
0:49

SANDERS: The CDC director was fired for failing to approve Sec. Kennedy's anti-vaccine agenda. If confirmed, will you commit to report to Congress if you receive directives from Kennedy to implement unscientific and harmful policies? SCHWARTZ: I do not believe that the president or secretary would ever do that SANDERS: Really? You think that's the record? He would not do that? That's what you're saying?

Aaron Rupar

75,775 views • 1 month ago

Kristi Noem on defying a court order: " I made that decision and that decision was under my complete authority… I'm so grateful that we get the opportunity every day to do that and to make decision… This is an activist judge…but I'm proud of the decisions that I've made."
1:36

Kristi Noem on defying a court order: " I made that decision and that decision was under my complete authority… I'm so grateful that we get the opportunity every day to do that and to make decision… This is an activist judge…but I'm proud of the decisions that I've made."

The Bulwark

69,504 views • 8 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."
5:46

#WATCH | Delhi | Rajya Sabha MP and Senior Advocate who is representing TMC, Kapil Sibal says, "...This case is an exception, and that is why I have come here. Because the mainstream media is reporting on the court case in a different way, they are reporting that our petition has been dismissed. This is wrong in itself... The TMC's claim in the High Court was that this circular is wrong... the High Court said that this circular is correct. When we came to the Supreme Court, we decided that we would not challenge the circular. But we will request the Supreme Court to implement it... The circular states that the EC has received information from many places that there are going to be some problems in every booth during the election... This is why the EC has decided that every booth will have a nominee from the central government..." He adds, "We stated in the Supreme Court that their own circular says if you want to keep a nominee from the central government, then do so, but keep a nominee from the state government as well. Randomise that as well... The Supreme Court noted that we were challenging the circular there, but we clarified that we are not challenging the circular anymore. We are saying that it should be implemented... Now we have hope. The Supreme Court said, and this is an order, that the EC will follow the circular issued by them both in letter and spirit... What is written is that there will be a nominee from the state government and a nominee from the central government... The mainstream media that is running it is saying that our petition has been dismissed. This is completely wrong... give them the right information..."

ANI

73,840 views • 3 months ago

You don’t hate the media enough ABC is reporting to their viewers that the Supreme Court ending Temporary Protected Status to Haitians is “Ethnic cleansing” in America “The decision by the Supreme Court in Mullen versus Doe, with a 6 to 3 decision, was!catastrophic for the immigrant community. Immigration attorney Sbahjumi Nassiri worries about the impact of the Supreme Court decision ending temporary protected status, or TPS, for Haitians and Syrians. TPS grants those from countries experiencing war or natural disaster to live and work legally in the US, but Thursday's ruling clears the way for Haitians and Syrians to be deported. Her concern, that it clears the way to target other immigrant communities “There's over 1.3 million immigrants who rely on TPS from 17 other countries” Deport them ALL. Thats 1.3 million American jobs that would be opening up, that’s 1.3 million homes and apartments that would be opening up. Thats 1.3 million potential fraudulent votes taken away from Democrats Keep in mind Temporary Protected Status people can get drivers licenses in America… this makes it very easy to walk in and vote
3:16

You don’t hate the media enough ABC is reporting to their viewers that the Supreme Court ending Temporary Protected Status to Haitians is “Ethnic cleansing” in America “The decision by the Supreme Court in Mullen versus Doe, with a 6 to 3 decision, was!catastrophic for the immigrant community. Immigration attorney Sbahjumi Nassiri worries about the impact of the Supreme Court decision ending temporary protected status, or TPS, for Haitians and Syrians. TPS grants those from countries experiencing war or natural disaster to live and work legally in the US, but Thursday's ruling clears the way for Haitians and Syrians to be deported. Her concern, that it clears the way to target other immigrant communities “There's over 1.3 million immigrants who rely on TPS from 17 other countries” Deport them ALL. Thats 1.3 million American jobs that would be opening up, that’s 1.3 million homes and apartments that would be opening up. Thats 1.3 million potential fraudulent votes taken away from Democrats Keep in mind Temporary Protected Status people can get drivers licenses in America… this makes it very easy to walk in and vote

Wall Street Apes

37,991 views • 15 days ago

GOLDMAN: Will you give Abrego Garcia the due process the Supreme Court has required you to give him? NOEM: If he were to come back to this country, he would be immediately removed again G: How do you know? The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that he hasn't been treated appropriately
2:13

GOLDMAN: Will you give Abrego Garcia the due process the Supreme Court has required you to give him? NOEM: If he were to come back to this country, he would be immediately removed again G: How do you know? The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that he hasn't been treated appropriately

Aaron Rupar

419,775 views • 1 year ago