💥 THIS IS MASSIVE 💥 ON DECEMBER 3rd 2024 RUSSELL JAY GOULD just COMPLETELY WITHDREW the Title 4 Sections 1,2 & 3 US Flag from the United Nations‼️‼️‼️ (WATCH LISTEN CAREFULLY👇👇)💥 Watch what happens next… PANIC 😱 It’s wayyyyy too late for the CABAL… THEY ARE OUT OF TIME... ⌛️ remember Q post says: “these people are stupid.” They thought they would never lose Don’t EVER forget: WE ARE WINNING 🥇 🏆 THAT IS A FACT 💯 💥BOOM💥 MOVES AND COUNTER MOVES ♟️ Quit whining that nothing is happening. It’s all about timing and hitting the military markers ♟️ Thank you Russell Jay Gould 🫡 Thank you God 🙏🏼 Thank you Military 🫡 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥show more

This guy is the reason Trump said "it's going to be a much better world 🌎 "

This is VERY BIG NEWS! Russell Jay Gould's name will go down in History. He has risked his life many times to accomplish what he set out to do. The UN is pretty much run now by the CCP. Young men going into the Armed Service of our country should know that.

Holy crap!! There are so many pieces moving at the same time moving like a well choreographed dance. God is good.

"ACT OF 1871 - MASONIC SHIPPING WARS, POSTAL WARS & BANKING WARS"

Just asked Grok about this guy, do your own research. He is not recognised by any governments or courts. 🧐

😎💥💥💥 I just got goosebumps. Things have been popping up so quickly some good some bad. The good is going to exceed the bad by far. This is so exciting 😉

TRUMP knew while in office !!! HE him self made a deal with Russel J Gould !!! Burt is NOT telling ??? Yep he is one of many secrets !!! Go ahead and vote for this guy ???

I bet the UN still gets that $45B they are requesting.

Grok said Withdrawing the Title 4, Sections 1, 2, and 3 of the U.S. Code related to the U.S. flag from the United Nations would have several implications, though the actual legal and practical consequences would be nuanced: 1. **Symbolic Impact**: - **Nationalism vs. Internationalism**: This action would be symbolic of a strong assertion of U.S. sovereignty and could be interpreted as a move towards isolationism or a rejection of international cooperation. It would likely be seen as a statement against the influence or perceived overreach of international bodies like the UN. - **Public Perception**: Domestically, it might resonate with segments of the population advocating for a reduction in international commitments, emphasizing national pride over globalism. Internationally, it could be viewed as a retreat from multilateralism, potentially affecting U.S. diplomatic relations. 2. **Legal and Regulatory Changes**: - **Flag Display**: Sections 1, 2, and 3 of Title 4 outline the basic design and use of the U.S. flag. Withdrawing these from the context of UN operations would mean that U.S. flag display rules wouldn't officially apply within UN premises or events, which might lead to less standardized or consistent use of the flag in international settings. However, the UN flag protocol would still govern flag displays at its headquarters. - **UN Practices**: The UN has its own flag protocols, and while the U.S. flag would still be recognized and displayed, it might not be governed by U.S. law within UN spaces. This could lead to scenarios where the U.S. flag is displayed in ways not compliant with U.S. regulations, like the number of stars or the arrangement, though this would be more symbolic than practical. 3. **Diplomatic and Political Consequences**: - **Relations with UN**: Such an action could signal a broader intent to reduce U.S. involvement in the UN, affecting diplomatic relations, possibly leading to tensions or negotiations regarding the U.S.'s role in the organization. - **Global Influence**: The U.S. has a significant say in UN affairs due to its status as a founding member and one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. Reducing formal adherence to U.S. flag protocol might be seen as a step back from this leadership role, potentially reducing U.S. influence or prompting other countries to push for reforms or changes in UN operations. 4. **Practical Implications**: - **Flag Usage at UN**: In practice, the U.S. flag would still be used in the UN, but under UN rules rather than U.S. law. This might not change much in day-to-day operations but could affect ceremonial or formal events. - **Cultural and Diplomatic Events**: U.S. diplomatic staff would continue to display the flag according to U.S. regulations outside of UN contexts, but within UN premises, they would follow UN protocol or negotiate specific arrangements. 5. **Legislation and Policy**: - **Legislative Action**: Such a withdrawal would likely require Congressional action or an executive decision, potentially sparking debates on U.S. international policy and the role of symbols like the flag in diplomacy. - **Precedent Setting**: This action could set a precedent for how other countries manage their national symbols within international bodies, possibly leading to a more fragmented approach to symbolic representation. In summary, while the direct impact on daily operations at the UN might be minimal, the symbolic, political, and diplomatic ramifications could be significant, reflecting broader sentiments about U.S. participation in global governance. However, any change in U.S. policy regarding its symbols at international forums would need to navigate through complex legal and diplomatic landscapes.