Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This is NOT government property. It’s private property owned by Sensor Dynamics Pty Ltd that are positioned generally in rural communities at each end of the town. Track and trace. The data is captured and sent to the cloud, that’s where FiveCast Pty Ltd comes into play. They collect...

30,260 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

.david friedberg: “We are now at a moment where we are saying there is no longer private property in the United States. This is one of the foundational rights that the founders of the United States tried to create: a distinction between these other nations that everyone flees from, where a monarchy or a totalitarian government or some communist system says everyone owns everything together, or some small number of people own and control everything. And that’s what this always comes down to. Whether it’s a socialist state or a communist state or a monarchy or some other totalitarian regime, there’s a small number of people that own and control everything. And that is the brink that we’re on. Because they are trying to say, for the first time ever, there is no longer private property in the United States. That if the government can say everything that you’ve already paid your income tax on, and then you’ve bought and you now own, the government can take a piece of it every year based on the vote and the budgetary needs of an irresponsible fiscal legislature. We’ve lost it all. And that’s where we are. And we see this just passed in Illinois. People think it’s just crypto, just like they think that billionaire tax is just billionaires. But anytime the government can take your private property after you’ve paid your taxes, bought something, and put it in your garage, we are done for. That is when the politburo has unlimited capacity to tax and take and do what they want. That’s the moment we’re at.”

Arjun Khemani

71,875 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Barack Obama ruined American healthcare and here are the facts “At the heart of the shutdown debate is whether or not Congress should extend these expanded temporary Obamacare subsidies. Here are 6 reasons why they shouldn't be extended - The first is that they cost almost half a trillion dollars. And at a time when we have $2 trillion annual deficits, we can't afford to throw more fuel on our fiscal bonfire - The second reason is that they're largely welfare for the well off. These credits can be claimed by people earning up to $600,000 a year. About a third of the cost goes to people over 400% of the poverty line. So they're simply not well targeted to people in need - The third reason is the subsidies are largely captured by insurance companies. The subsidy themselves goes directly to insurance companies and then it's captured in the form of higher price inflation and larger profits by these large insurance companies. - Fourth reason is that they fuel rampant enrollment fraud. More than 6 million people are improperly enrolled and millions more don't use the coverage that they're enrolled in, signaling that there's more people enrolled in the program than there should be - Fifth reason is that patients don't value the coverage. They only are enrolled because the federal government is covering 100% of of the cost for many people. And if the government only covered 90% of the cost, they would choose to spend their own money on something they value more. - The last reason is these subsidies were initially temporary on purpose. They were a response to the pandemic and the pandemic is over. And these are the reasons Congress should let these subsidies expire. They are expensive, they're not well targeted, and they fuel rampant fraud in our healthcare system.”

Wall Street Apes

77,528 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

There is a new scam going on in this home inspection industry - Large corporations are buying up all the small home inspection companies - They don’t care about making money off inspecting homes, they want the data Why? This is where it gets borderline criminal Home inspections are supposed to be confidential, but what they’re doing is buying all the companies to own the data Then they are going to sell that data to insurance companies and lenders Now with this new information the insurance company finds out, they're going to start charging you $3,000 (or whatever) extra a year to insure that house Here’s what I’ve found Large corporations and private equity firms are aggressively consolidating the home inspection industry primarily by buying inspection software platforms like Spectora, HomeGauge and larger inspection companies A home inspection report contains highly detailed property specific information like roof age and condition, electrical and plumbing issues, foundation problems, HVAC status, environmental hazards This is extremely valuable for: - Insurance companies (risk assessment and underwriting). - Lenders (property valuation and loan risk). - Home warranty providers, contractors, and data brokers Home inspections are supposed to be confidential between the buyer, inspector, and sometimes the real estate parties. However, many inspection software companies’ terms of service allow data aggregation and sharing That’s the loophole they found. That’s the scam

Wall Street Apes

268,216 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Ron Pragides 

258,567 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.

Hopewell Chin’ono

80,760 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 IRAN IS SHOWING THE WORLD WHAT CENSORSHIP REALLY LOOKS LIKE As millions of Iranians rise up against their Islamic dictatorship, the regime is doing what all collapsing tyrannies do: They are cutting the internet. They are killing the signal. They are trying to erase reality. Why? Because videos don’t lie. Because once the world sees the beatings, the shootings, and the bodies in the streets, the regime’s story collapses. That’s why Starlink terrifies Tehran. Starlink has become the last digital lifeline between Iranian protesters and the outside world — allowing citizen journalists to upload videos, photos, and proof of what is happening in real time, even during a total blackout. The regime knows this. They are now jamming signals, hunting terminals, and raiding rooftops to try to silence it. People are being imprisoned — even accused of “spying” — simply for trying to tell the truth. And while this is happening, Western governments are watching very closely. Because Iran is a living warning of where censorship always leads: First they regulate. Then they restrict. Then they silence. Then they cut the connection entirely. Starmer in the UK and Albanese in Australia want to ban or control X for the same reason Tehran wants to kill Starlink: They don’t want people seeing what power is really doing. Iran isn’t just fighting its own people. It’s fighting the idea that the public has the right to know. And that fight is global.

Jim Ferguson

44,908 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад