Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
This is not in our national interest. Who is Starmer really surrendering Chagos for...
71,033 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
10 Yorum

Hilarious This was instigated wholly by your part time cosplay Prime Minister who survived 7 weeks

💪 Merica, we're taking it back. 💯 You like Trump, you know it, time to show it. ✅ T's for Trump here:

Having read through the replies to Starmer and the the Government's posts to social media on the Chagos Islands deal, it is evident that there is overwhelming anger at what people see as treachery. There are very few people who express any support for what Starmer has done.

Backroom deals always carry a stench. If this is in the national interest—why the silence, the speed, the secrecy? Leadership means owning the decision and showing the people why. Not slipping it through the cracks.

Even the islanders don’t want it!

Why a Reform government should reverse it: The Claim 🇬🇧Mauritius’s claim is paper-thin: uses UN-era decolonisation rhetoric, not history, ethnicity, culture, or geography. Chagos is 1300 miles away. Mauritius never exercised sovereignty over the islands—Chagos was detached before Mauritian independence. 🇬🇧The ICJ ruling is advisory, not binding. Major powers (US, China, France, Russia) routinely ignore such rulings when strategic interests are at stake. 🇬🇧Chagossian self-determination ignored in favour of elite political bargaining. Strategic Risk 🇬🇧 Dangerous precedent for other UK territories—Gibraltar & the Falklands. 🇬🇧Handover motivation is Global South appeasement—driven by legalist ideology, not strategic interest. 🇬🇧Lease payments to Mauritius are disguised reparations paid by the UK defence budget. Reversal 🇬🇧Britain withdrew from ICJ jurisdiction in 1966—it has no authority to compel UK compliance. 🇬🇧The Diego Garcia base remains under UK/US operational control—no power on earth can disrupt it. The only threat is from noisy lawyers 🇬🇧International reaction would be loud but ultimately symbolic

The deal your party started!

Maybe we should ask the question, who exactly is Starmer? For there are many things about this man that are troublesome.

Starmer was definitely put in power to destroy the UK

Have you forgotten that it was YOUR party that started the handover of the islands?
Benzer Videolar
Sensitive content
Economic situation 'is not going to be easy, clearly' — Keir Starmer 'Our long-term national interest requires closer partnership with our allies in Europe'
RT
31,315 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce



