Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 THIS IS NUTS 🚨 Canada isn’t what you think it is. Your “Constitution”? It doesn’t protect you it protects them. 20 minutes that will change how you see this country. Watch this before it disappears. 👇

91,101 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

31 Yorum

Vicki Johnson 🇨🇦❤️🇬🇷💙 profil fotoğrafı
Vicki Johnson 🇨🇦❤️🇬🇷💙1 yıl önce

Sean Buckley shed a lot of light on our Canadian Constitution, information that very few people in Canada 🍁 really know. Even those of us who studied Canadian History in school didn't realize how flawed our Constitution was or who was actually protected — definitely not the citizens of Canada 🇨🇦. That is why we need to become a Constitutional Republic, as in the US 🇺🇸. We should have done this back in 1867 instead of staying under the wing of Britain 🇬🇧 and under the Commonwealth. What’s more, what will shake Canadians even further is seeing the following film, which explains that our Constitution isn’t even valid. Neither our Constitution nor our Charter has served Canadians well, and since 2020, we have seen how quickly the rights and freedoms that we all thought we had were suspended and disregarded by the Turd💩eau regime. We need massive Constitutional reform in this country; however, it's very unlikely to happen because Canadians are too complacent to demand such change.👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

Rhonda Downey profil fotoğrafı
Rhonda Downey1 yıl önce

Wow! This is scary given what’s going on over in England. But it might also explain why Carney brought the King over. Yikes! Thanks for sharing.

Ptsah profil fotoğrafı
Ptsah1 yıl önce

Sooo Step one: Pray to God. Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God have mercy on us, sinners. Step two: Abolish the monarchy.

Goose watch profil fotoğrafı
Goose watch1 yıl önce

@Rhipley777 I’d start listening.

Marc Nixon profil fotoğrafı
Marc Nixon1 yıl önce

Video clip provided by @alberta_cw

scotty 🇺🇸🇨🇦 profil fotoğrafı
scotty 🇺🇸🇨🇦1 yıl önce

The government is not here for us. In 🇨🇦 Politicians Judges Lawyers Police Military members All swear allegiance to the monarch, not the people

Angela Unspoken profil fotoğrafı
Angela Unspoken1 yıl önce

Has anyone found my jaw? It dropped and I’m looking for it.

Yvonne C profil fotoğrafı
Yvonne C1 yıl önce

So King Charles still owns Canada, and guess who runs the next king's royal household, managing William and Kate's day-to-day affairs? It's the PM's brother, Sean Carney. No conspiracies here. Just one big club and Canadians aren't in it. We just bear the consequences.

JUSTICE FREEDOM⚖️🇺🇲 profil fotoğrafı
JUSTICE FREEDOM⚖️🇺🇲1 yıl önce

Articles of Confederation TRUMPS King Charles. Where is King Charles ?

@DivaDonatella profil fotoğrafı
@DivaDonatella1 yıl önce

You can find a consolidated PDF of the full text—of the 1867 and 1982 Acts with amendments, on the Government website: ( The individual acts (HTML): - Constitution Act, 1867: ( - Constitution Act, 1982**: (

Christopher Olguin profil fotoğrafı
Christopher Olguin1 yıl önce

@BreannaMorello I thought this lesson Canada is relearning or just learning is interesting, especially after what happened to the ostriches. The people aren’t really free, have zero rights and are only granted privileges. We are devolving into something akin to that.

J B profil fotoğrafı
J B1 yıl önce

51st State would give us a Real Constitution.

Angie profil fotoğrafı
Angie1 yıl önce

The vaxx wasn’t a vaccine, it is a bio weapon

russell profil fotoğrafı
russell1 yıl önce

Canada needs to seperate from GB just like america did in 1776.

Just a Canadian Nobody profil fotoğrafı
Just a Canadian Nobody1 yıl önce

Westminster Act, December 11, 1931. ALL Provinces are considered Sovereign States. Federal government is illegitimate.

Hobbit of hyperinflation profil fotoğrafı
Hobbit of hyperinflation1 yıl önce

No Kings indeed.

Stefan Marquis profil fotoğrafı
Stefan Marquis1 yıl önce

I have a few comments to offer on this subject. First, let me admit to limits. I am not a constitutional lawyer, scholar or expert. I have, however, read the Constitution. And it had brought me to ask question for which I have never obtained satisfactory answers. In short: 1. Words matter. When introducing this subject in conversation with friends, some have butted against my concerns the automatic response that since 1982, the varied roles and attributions described in the Constitution are 'symbolic', and each time I'm like... what?? Why use such elaborate and detailed role assignations if these are to be only symbolic? This doesn't jive well with me. It is like orwellian Doublespeak: 2+2=5, or a man is a woman. It is a mental disposition trying to coax you into accepting something which is contradictory at face value. The King is chief of the army: it is written in plain letters black on white. Personally, I cannot stand such perfidiousness. So I'm not going along with it. The Constitution is filled with this sort of Newspeak - Doublespeak nonsense. Yes, words matter. 2. Historical precedents. Even as the Constitution had freshly been redacted and put into law, some provinces tried to secede or participate along their own terms, like Nova Scotia or Assiniboia (which became Manitoba), were simply rejected or ignored. The Crown denied their claims. Another more recent example is Quebec. Few people know this, but Quebec as a province never signed either the 1867 or 1982 constitutions; it didn't even give its consent to the one of 1982. Yet, the British considers the Constitution Act as supreme and obligatory to provinces by default. It's as if it says : "you can't escape it". So enough about any proper sense of free will and sovereign rule by the people. That seems to be total horseshit to me. 3. We are subjects of the Crown. When asking artificial intelligence about all of this, it claims that all things of the Crown in the Constitution are symbolic - even the Governor, who often plays a huge role in formal procedures. I feel as though there's something not right about this. AI claims that the Governor General must sign any declaration of War made by Parliament, otherwise it is null and void. Yet, it says that the his or her role is symbolic. It claims that he or she will sign no matter what. Again: Doublespeak. AI is feeding its answers from the body of discourse made available to it online, which is obviously tainted with the generally accepted narrative. I don't buy it. We remain, along the disclosed principles found in the Constitution Act, subjects of the Crown. Prove me wrong. If we're not, the official document should remove all mentions of it. I don't care about the 'sense of traditional continuity' some claim the Crown legacy brings to our constitutional make up. The Governorship's cost is crazy expensive; at that rate, I say goodbye to continuity. +++ King Charles came to make his Throne Speech in front of all too happy Mark Carney this year. He was dressed in full gear. He sure as hell takes it seriously. Why not we?

Gee Willikers🍸✝️☘️🗽♀️🪶 profil fotoğrafı
Gee Willikers🍸✝️☘️🗽♀️🪶1 yıl önce

If the seemingly politically involved/aware host (shockingly) didn't know we had a constitution, how can we possibly expect inattentive, low information Canadians to make informed decisions at the ballot box? No wonder we're in this mess 🤬 Bring civics courses back to schools!!

GammaL profil fotoğrafı
GammaL1 yıl önce

Chucky gets his marching orders from the WEF.

Nop profil fotoğrafı
Nop1 yıl önce

Makes sense, we are a constitutional monarchy. The monarchy is our head of state. We pick the Kings representatives to govern in his absence, we may be independent however we closely follow the crown not the US. We need to become a republic and cut ties like the US

Judy schade profil fotoğrafı
Judy schade1 yıl önce

Wow 🙀. Think First Nations and King Charles are going to have a chat?

🪬Aevalabs profil fotoğrafı
🪬Aevalabs1 yıl önce

A revolution is not just a fanciful idea reserved for our imaginations, or even our future selves or generations. It is now an absolute necessity💪🇨🇦

SpecialNeedsNation profil fotoğrafı
SpecialNeedsNation1 yıl önce

Holy Shlit! It’s a feudal system. No wonder they keep telling them “You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy!”

Cyndi Henry profil fotoğrafı
Cyndi Henry1 yıl önce

Why do you think they say crown lands... crown highways. Its all in our law books

Joseph Waldner profil fotoğrafı
Joseph Waldner1 yıl önce

CANADA INC is unraveling at the seams

Big Easy profil fotoğrafı
Big Easy1 yıl önce

Anyone that takes the time to listen to swearing in ceremonies both federally and provincially knows that politicians serving the people is a fraud that has been taught to us. They all swear allegiance to the crown.

Butch Atkinson profil fotoğrafı
Butch Atkinson1 yıl önce

Stephen Harper, if the CPC were not actively participating in "the great reset', could have used his majority to make the changes that would protect us from the commonwealth and the UN. We can't vote our way out of this kids.

DanielMichaelis profil fotoğrafı
DanielMichaelis1 yıl önce

Thank you very, very much. Best vid on X. Most informative talk to date. Best rabbit hole and Canadian could go down.

stalXalon profil fotoğrafı
stalXalon1 yıl önce

People are delusional with all the propaganda Some Jerk in a palace allegedly owns this land? now allegedly some AB-non-Originals own it? READ lysander spooners Constitution of NO Authority maybe THEN people will figure it out we all are living Anarchy, not monArchy or AligArchy

_Pinkie_22_P#🇨🇦#🇺🇸# profil fotoğrafı
_Pinkie_22_P#🇨🇦#🇺🇸#1 yıl önce

Cancel Agenda 2030, 🇨🇦 Conservative signed it to allow the UN to control Canadians.

chycho profil fotoğrafı
chycho1 yıl önce

Those 4 doctors should be arrested and locked away for life. All their assets seized, and if we ever bring back the death penalty, they should be duly executed.

Benzer Videolar