正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

This is only the second chimpanzee civil war ever documented. The first was Gombe, 1974. Fifty years apart. Genetic data suggests chimp communities split roughly once every 500 years. Gombe was 9 males breaking off from a group of about 60. The splinter faction was hunted down over four...

aakashgupta's profile picture

Aakash Gupta

292,332 subscribers

1,313,033 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术动物
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🏛️⚖️ For a thousand years, the British people governed themselves without the state. This is how they did it. A thousand years ago in England, there were no police. There were no prisons. There was no central state strong enough to reach every village. And yet, somehow, England worked. The reason was something the Anglo-Saxons had built into the foundations of their society. They called it frankpledge. Every man in every village belonged to a group of ten. They were called a tithing. ⚖️ And each man, by law, was responsible for the conduct of every other man in his tithing. If one man committed a crime, his nine neighbours were responsible for bringing him to justice. If they failed, they paid the fine themselves. The whole tithing answered for the crime of one man. 📜 The system was given the force of law by King Canute, the Anglo-Danish king who united England in peace. Between 1016 and 1035, Canute decreed that every man over the age of 12 must belong to a tithing. When the Normans came in 1066, they could have abolished it. They did the opposite. William the Conqueror kept the Anglo-Saxon system. And he made it stronger. ⚔️ Twice every year, the Sheriff would arrive in the village. He would call the tithings together. He would check that every man was accounted for. This was called the View of Frankpledge. The system held England together for 300 years. And when the king's courts eventually grew to replace it, two pieces of frankpledge stayed behind. 🔥 The first became the jury. Twelve neighbours, called to judge another. The same idea, transplanted from the village to the courtroom. The second became the constable. The man chosen from among neighbours to keep the peace. Not imposed from above. Chosen from below. Modern British policing began here. The jury system began here. The principle that ordinary British people are responsible for ordinary British people began in an Anglo-Saxon village a thousand years ago. ✍️ For a thousand years, we have been responsible for each other. We do not need the state to teach us how to belong. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ This channel has no ads. No sponsors. No state funding. It is built the same way the tithing was built. By the people who choose to stand in it. Be part of us 🇬🇧👉 👈🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
2:14

🏛️⚖️ For a thousand years, the British people governed themselves without the state. This is how they did it. A thousand years ago in England, there were no police. There were no prisons. There was no central state strong enough to reach every village. And yet, somehow, England worked. The reason was something the Anglo-Saxons had built into the foundations of their society. They called it frankpledge. Every man in every village belonged to a group of ten. They were called a tithing. ⚖️ And each man, by law, was responsible for the conduct of every other man in his tithing. If one man committed a crime, his nine neighbours were responsible for bringing him to justice. If they failed, they paid the fine themselves. The whole tithing answered for the crime of one man. 📜 The system was given the force of law by King Canute, the Anglo-Danish king who united England in peace. Between 1016 and 1035, Canute decreed that every man over the age of 12 must belong to a tithing. When the Normans came in 1066, they could have abolished it. They did the opposite. William the Conqueror kept the Anglo-Saxon system. And he made it stronger. ⚔️ Twice every year, the Sheriff would arrive in the village. He would call the tithings together. He would check that every man was accounted for. This was called the View of Frankpledge. The system held England together for 300 years. And when the king's courts eventually grew to replace it, two pieces of frankpledge stayed behind. 🔥 The first became the jury. Twelve neighbours, called to judge another. The same idea, transplanted from the village to the courtroom. The second became the constable. The man chosen from among neighbours to keep the peace. Not imposed from above. Chosen from below. Modern British policing began here. The jury system began here. The principle that ordinary British people are responsible for ordinary British people began in an Anglo-Saxon village a thousand years ago. ✍️ For a thousand years, we have been responsible for each other. We do not need the state to teach us how to belong. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ This channel has no ads. No sponsors. No state funding. It is built the same way the tithing was built. By the people who choose to stand in it. Be part of us 🇬🇧👉 👈🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

152,329 次观看 • 2 个月前

A woman adopted two dogs from separate shelters 40 miles apart without knowing anything about their past, and the moment the second dog walked through the door both animals broke down crying and ran to each other — touching noses and whimpering in a way that stopped her cold. Calls to both shelters uncovered the truth: the two dogs had lived together for 6 years, been separated when their owner passed away, and had spent 9 months apart before a single person unknowingly brought them back together. Shelter staff said the odds of it happening by chance were almost impossible. They spent their first week refusing to separate by even a step, and still sleep pressed against each other every night as if they know how close they came to never finding each other again. Do you think something guided her to choose them both, or was it just the most unlikely luck imaginable?
0:54

A woman adopted two dogs from separate shelters 40 miles apart without knowing anything about their past, and the moment the second dog walked through the door both animals broke down crying and ran to each other — touching noses and whimpering in a way that stopped her cold. Calls to both shelters uncovered the truth: the two dogs had lived together for 6 years, been separated when their owner passed away, and had spent 9 months apart before a single person unknowingly brought them back together. Shelter staff said the odds of it happening by chance were almost impossible. They spent their first week refusing to separate by even a step, and still sleep pressed against each other every night as if they know how close they came to never finding each other again. Do you think something guided her to choose them both, or was it just the most unlikely luck imaginable?

Crazy Moments

419,963 次观看 • 2 个月前

Let’s look at what my sister is actually saying. First, I am not arguing about the term ‘Genocide against the #Tutsi.’ It is a fact. Tutsis were hunted and killed just for being Tutsi, and Hutus did the killing. But let’s be honest about the story being told. While Hutu extremists were the killers, the Gacaca court records prove that most Hutus did not kill anyone. The story from the FPR-Inkotanyi is a lie. They try to make every Hutu look like a murderer just to shame the whole group. The official ceremonies are also unfair. They honor the Tutsis, which is right, but Hutus killed by the #Interahamwe or the #RPA get no respect from the country. By ignoring them, the government is treating these innocent victims like the monsters who killed them. Then there is the big lie: The government says there are no ethnic groups in Rwanda(#Ndi umunyarwanda ), but their whole definition of the genocide depends on those groups. It’s a joke. This confusing talk is why foreigners always ask: "Are you from the group that killed or the group that died❓ Make no mistake: Paul Kagame and the FPR-Inkotanyi are doing this on purpose. They want to hide their own part in the violence. From the shooting down of #Habyarimana’s plane ( that’s not justification for killing Tutsi’s tho) the killings in Byumba, Gakurozo, Kibeho, and the Congo, they are trying to bury history. They refuse to remember all victims so they can keep these events hidden from the world. #MillenZMovementRw
1:47

Let’s look at what my sister is actually saying. First, I am not arguing about the term ‘Genocide against the #Tutsi.’ It is a fact. Tutsis were hunted and killed just for being Tutsi, and Hutus did the killing. But let’s be honest about the story being told. While Hutu extremists were the killers, the Gacaca court records prove that most Hutus did not kill anyone. The story from the FPR-Inkotanyi is a lie. They try to make every Hutu look like a murderer just to shame the whole group. The official ceremonies are also unfair. They honor the Tutsis, which is right, but Hutus killed by the #Interahamwe or the #RPA get no respect from the country. By ignoring them, the government is treating these innocent victims like the monsters who killed them. Then there is the big lie: The government says there are no ethnic groups in Rwanda(#Ndi umunyarwanda ), but their whole definition of the genocide depends on those groups. It’s a joke. This confusing talk is why foreigners always ask: "Are you from the group that killed or the group that died❓ Make no mistake: Paul Kagame and the FPR-Inkotanyi are doing this on purpose. They want to hide their own part in the violence. From the shooting down of #Habyarimana’s plane ( that’s not justification for killing Tutsi’s tho) the killings in Byumba, Gakurozo, Kibeho, and the Congo, they are trying to bury history. They refuse to remember all victims so they can keep these events hidden from the world. #MillenZMovementRw

U.Sheila C kamuzinzi 🇷🇼🇸🇬

60,766 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk just put a 12-month countdown on the end of human cognitive dominance. Musk: “I think we might have AI that is smarter than any human by the end of this year. And I would say no later than next year.” Not a decade. Not five years. This year. Or next. A machine that surpasses the smartest human who has ever lived. Every Nobel laureate. Every genius. Every person at the absolute peak of human intellectual capability. Eclipsed. Within twelve months. Think about the smartest person you have ever met in your life. The one whose mind made you feel like you were operating on a different level. That person. Gone past. This year. But that’s just the first threshold. The second one is where the human mind stops being able to process the implications. Musk: “Probably by 2030 or 2031, call it five years from now, AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively.” Not smarter than any individual. Smarter than every human being alive. Combined. Eight billion minds. Centuries of accumulated knowledge. The entire cognitive output of our species. Surpassed by a single system inside of five years. For all of recorded history, human intelligence was the most powerful force on earth. Every civilization. Every discovery. Every advancement in the human story. All of it produced by biological minds working at the edge of their capability. That era has an end date now. And the nation that builds the system crossing that threshold first doesn’t just win the AI race. It dictates the terms of every race that comes after it. The countdown Musk is describing isn’t a prediction anymore. It’s the last chapter of a story that took 300,000 years to write.
0:32

Elon Musk just put a 12-month countdown on the end of human cognitive dominance. Musk: “I think we might have AI that is smarter than any human by the end of this year. And I would say no later than next year.” Not a decade. Not five years. This year. Or next. A machine that surpasses the smartest human who has ever lived. Every Nobel laureate. Every genius. Every person at the absolute peak of human intellectual capability. Eclipsed. Within twelve months. Think about the smartest person you have ever met in your life. The one whose mind made you feel like you were operating on a different level. That person. Gone past. This year. But that’s just the first threshold. The second one is where the human mind stops being able to process the implications. Musk: “Probably by 2030 or 2031, call it five years from now, AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively.” Not smarter than any individual. Smarter than every human being alive. Combined. Eight billion minds. Centuries of accumulated knowledge. The entire cognitive output of our species. Surpassed by a single system inside of five years. For all of recorded history, human intelligence was the most powerful force on earth. Every civilization. Every discovery. Every advancement in the human story. All of it produced by biological minds working at the edge of their capability. That era has an end date now. And the nation that builds the system crossing that threshold first doesn’t just win the AI race. It dictates the terms of every race that comes after it. The countdown Musk is describing isn’t a prediction anymore. It’s the last chapter of a story that took 300,000 years to write.

Dustin

102,803 次观看 • 4 个月前

Britain had a wonder of the world. ⚔️🇬🇧 For 600 years, London Bridge wasn't a bridge. It was a street. A town. A city floating on the Thames. Construction began in 1176 and took 33 years. When it was finished it had 19 stone arches, a drawbridge to let ships through, and a chapel dedicated to Saint Thomas Becket at its heart. The starting point for every pilgrim walking to Canterbury. Then people started building on it. At its peak: 200 buildings. 500 residents. 🏘️ Haberdashers, booksellers, apothecaries, taverns and alehouses open from dawn. The longest inhabited bridge in Europe. You could walk halfway across and never know you were over a river. In 1212, three years after completion, a fire killed thousands on the bridge itself. 🔥 In 1282, five arches collapsed under winter ice. The arches slowed the Thames so much that in hard winters the river froze solid. Londoners held frost fairs on the ice. Bull-baiting. Pop-up taverns. A printing press operating on a frozen river. 🧊 Every time something went wrong, they rebuilt. London Bridge stood for 622 years. Then in 1831 they demolished it. The Victorian replacement lasted barely a century. By the 1960s it was sinking into the Thames. So the City of London sold it to an American for $2.46 million. 💰 He had it dismantled stone by stone and shipped to the Arizona desert. Where it still stands today. 🏜️ Britain had a wonder of the world on the Thames for six hundred years. We sold what replaced it to Arizona. Did they teach you that? We will. 🇬🇧 Proud Of Us is a community of ordinary British people keeping extraordinary British history alive. No ads. No sponsors. Just us. If that matters to you, join us at 🙏 Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧
3:06

Britain had a wonder of the world. ⚔️🇬🇧 For 600 years, London Bridge wasn't a bridge. It was a street. A town. A city floating on the Thames. Construction began in 1176 and took 33 years. When it was finished it had 19 stone arches, a drawbridge to let ships through, and a chapel dedicated to Saint Thomas Becket at its heart. The starting point for every pilgrim walking to Canterbury. Then people started building on it. At its peak: 200 buildings. 500 residents. 🏘️ Haberdashers, booksellers, apothecaries, taverns and alehouses open from dawn. The longest inhabited bridge in Europe. You could walk halfway across and never know you were over a river. In 1212, three years after completion, a fire killed thousands on the bridge itself. 🔥 In 1282, five arches collapsed under winter ice. The arches slowed the Thames so much that in hard winters the river froze solid. Londoners held frost fairs on the ice. Bull-baiting. Pop-up taverns. A printing press operating on a frozen river. 🧊 Every time something went wrong, they rebuilt. London Bridge stood for 622 years. Then in 1831 they demolished it. The Victorian replacement lasted barely a century. By the 1960s it was sinking into the Thames. So the City of London sold it to an American for $2.46 million. 💰 He had it dismantled stone by stone and shipped to the Arizona desert. Where it still stands today. 🏜️ Britain had a wonder of the world on the Thames for six hundred years. We sold what replaced it to Arizona. Did they teach you that? We will. 🇬🇧 Proud Of Us is a community of ordinary British people keeping extraordinary British history alive. No ads. No sponsors. Just us. If that matters to you, join us at 🙏 Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

262,816 次观看 • 3 个月前

The FA wrote the rules of football in 1863. The rules you actually play by? A greenhouse. In Sheffield. 1858. Two mates from the cricket club went for a walk one autumn afternoon. They wanted something to do when the cricket season ended. So they started a football club. The first one on earth. Their headquarters was a greenhouse. Their pitch was the field next to it. There was nobody else to play. So they split into married against singles. Then they wrote rules. No hacking. No tripping. No holding. Free kicks. Throw-ins. Corner kicks. The crossbar. Heading. Eleven players. Ninety minutes. Referees. All Sheffield. When they played London in 1866 and headed the ball, London laughed at them. Nobody's laughing now. In 1867 Sheffield hosted the world's first football competition. Four years before the FA Cup. The trophy went missing for 130 years. A Scottish antiques dealer found it. Worth over £100,000 today. When football turned professional, Sheffield refused. They chose the game over the money. And the game left them behind. William Prest died at fifty-two. His gravestone was removed from the cemetery. Nathaniel Creswick died in October 1917. Exactly sixty years after founding the club. In 2004, FIFA gave Sheffield FC the Order of Merit. The only other club to receive it? Real Madrid. Eighty thousand seats. One of the greatest clubs on earth. Sheffield FC play in the ninth tier of English football. Two thousand seats. Every corner kick. Every header. Every ninety minutes. Two friends. One autumn walk. A greenhouse. Sheffield started it all. The beautiful game had humble beginnings. So do we. Your support keeps us on the pitch. Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧
3:20

The FA wrote the rules of football in 1863. The rules you actually play by? A greenhouse. In Sheffield. 1858. Two mates from the cricket club went for a walk one autumn afternoon. They wanted something to do when the cricket season ended. So they started a football club. The first one on earth. Their headquarters was a greenhouse. Their pitch was the field next to it. There was nobody else to play. So they split into married against singles. Then they wrote rules. No hacking. No tripping. No holding. Free kicks. Throw-ins. Corner kicks. The crossbar. Heading. Eleven players. Ninety minutes. Referees. All Sheffield. When they played London in 1866 and headed the ball, London laughed at them. Nobody's laughing now. In 1867 Sheffield hosted the world's first football competition. Four years before the FA Cup. The trophy went missing for 130 years. A Scottish antiques dealer found it. Worth over £100,000 today. When football turned professional, Sheffield refused. They chose the game over the money. And the game left them behind. William Prest died at fifty-two. His gravestone was removed from the cemetery. Nathaniel Creswick died in October 1917. Exactly sixty years after founding the club. In 2004, FIFA gave Sheffield FC the Order of Merit. The only other club to receive it? Real Madrid. Eighty thousand seats. One of the greatest clubs on earth. Sheffield FC play in the ninth tier of English football. Two thousand seats. Every corner kick. Every header. Every ninety minutes. Two friends. One autumn walk. A greenhouse. Sheffield started it all. The beautiful game had humble beginnings. So do we. Your support keeps us on the pitch. Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

208,560 次观看 • 4 个月前

Intelligence was the one thing that never scaled. We scaled everything else. Steel. Energy. Compute. The one resource that built all of it never left the skull. Musk: “People thought defeating Go was either never or 20 years away.” Twelve months later it was over. Musk: “Now that same AlphaGo system can defeat the top 50 players simultaneously with 0% chance of them winning. And that’s one year later.” Fifty lifetimes of mastery against a system that does not know it is playing a game. Zero percent chance. That was not a competition. That was a preview. Musk: “The degrees of freedom to which artificial intelligence is able to apply itself are really increasing by 10 orders of magnitude a year.” Ten billion times. Every twelve months. No brain alive can visualize that number. By design. Every hard problem that ever defeated us did it for the same reason. Not complexity. Scarcity. The only mind capable of solving it was biological and there was never enough of it. Cancer. Fusion. Climate. The physics we cannot even see yet. Not waiting on more data. Waiting on something that can think at a scale biology never allowed. That just arrived. Most people hear this and reduce it to a question about their paycheck. They are watching the single largest expansion of capability in the history of life on this planet and worrying about a job title. For ten thousand years intelligence had one speed. One brain. One lifetime. Every civilization on earth throttled by the same biological ceiling. That ceiling just shattered. We are the only species that ever hit its own limit and built what breaks through it. That is not an ending. That is the point of everything we ever built.
0:32

Intelligence was the one thing that never scaled. We scaled everything else. Steel. Energy. Compute. The one resource that built all of it never left the skull. Musk: “People thought defeating Go was either never or 20 years away.” Twelve months later it was over. Musk: “Now that same AlphaGo system can defeat the top 50 players simultaneously with 0% chance of them winning. And that’s one year later.” Fifty lifetimes of mastery against a system that does not know it is playing a game. Zero percent chance. That was not a competition. That was a preview. Musk: “The degrees of freedom to which artificial intelligence is able to apply itself are really increasing by 10 orders of magnitude a year.” Ten billion times. Every twelve months. No brain alive can visualize that number. By design. Every hard problem that ever defeated us did it for the same reason. Not complexity. Scarcity. The only mind capable of solving it was biological and there was never enough of it. Cancer. Fusion. Climate. The physics we cannot even see yet. Not waiting on more data. Waiting on something that can think at a scale biology never allowed. That just arrived. Most people hear this and reduce it to a question about their paycheck. They are watching the single largest expansion of capability in the history of life on this planet and worrying about a job title. For ten thousand years intelligence had one speed. One brain. One lifetime. Every civilization on earth throttled by the same biological ceiling. That ceiling just shattered. We are the only species that ever hit its own limit and built what breaks through it. That is not an ending. That is the point of everything we ever built.

Dustin

24,315 次观看 • 26 天前

Two Asian elephants, Shirley and Jenny, spent one winter together in 1973 at a circus in the United States. Shirley was a fully grown adult of about 25. Jenny was a young calf, just arrived from Sumatra. They were separated when the season ended. Shirley went on with the circus. Jenny was sold elsewhere. Twenty-two years later, both worn out and injured, they ended up retired to the same sanctuary in Tennessee. Different decades, different states, different owners in between. They had not seen each other since Jenny was a baby. The night Jenny was led into the barn next to Shirley’s stall, she became frantic to get closer. The two of them trumpeted, roared, and reached for each other so hard they bent the steel bars between them. The staff opened the gate. Shirley took on a mother role and the two became inseparable for the next seven years until Jenny passed. Elephants have the largest brain of any animal that walks on land. The hippocampus, the part of the brain that handles memory, is enormous in elephants relative to their body size. They can pick out the bones of a dead relative decades later by smell. A study in 2024 found they use distinct vocal sounds as names for each other, the way we do. So when people say an elephant never forgets, it isn’t a saying. They’ve actually been measuring it.
1:06

Two Asian elephants, Shirley and Jenny, spent one winter together in 1973 at a circus in the United States. Shirley was a fully grown adult of about 25. Jenny was a young calf, just arrived from Sumatra. They were separated when the season ended. Shirley went on with the circus. Jenny was sold elsewhere. Twenty-two years later, both worn out and injured, they ended up retired to the same sanctuary in Tennessee. Different decades, different states, different owners in between. They had not seen each other since Jenny was a baby. The night Jenny was led into the barn next to Shirley’s stall, she became frantic to get closer. The two of them trumpeted, roared, and reached for each other so hard they bent the steel bars between them. The staff opened the gate. Shirley took on a mother role and the two became inseparable for the next seven years until Jenny passed. Elephants have the largest brain of any animal that walks on land. The hippocampus, the part of the brain that handles memory, is enormous in elephants relative to their body size. They can pick out the bones of a dead relative decades later by smell. A study in 2024 found they use distinct vocal sounds as names for each other, the way we do. So when people say an elephant never forgets, it isn’t a saying. They’ve actually been measuring it.

Lemma the Optimist

128,539 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk is trying to solve a problem with a perfect record against every living thing that has ever existed. Extinction. Undefeated. 4.5 billion years without a single loss. But it has only ever fought life that couldn’t leave. Musk: “The fundamental fork in the road for human destiny is where Mars can continue to grow even if the supply ships from Earth stop coming for any reason.” Over 99% of all species that have ever lived are gone. Every single one died on the planet where it was born. The dinosaurs ran Earth for 165 million years. Dominance, scale, deep time. None of it mattered. One rock from the sky ended it all in an afternoon. They didn’t lack strength. They lacked a second address. Musk: “If we only have one planet, then that could be curtains.” Curtains. One word for the end of every poem, every equation, every name ever spoken. All of it stored on one rock, orbiting one star, with no copy anywhere in the universe. Engineers learned this a century ago. One server is a hobby. Two is a system. We run an entire species on one server. Musk: “Mars can potentially come to the rescue of Earth. Or maybe Earth can come to the rescue of Mars.” People get this exactly backwards. Mars is not an escape pod. You don’t copy something because you hate the original. You copy it because it is irreplaceable. Earth is not being abandoned. Earth is the thing being protected. Life has done this before. 375 million years ago, something dragged itself out of the ocean. Not fleeing the water. Refusing to stay in the only medium it had ever known. Every forest, every bird, every human descends from that single refusal. Mars is the second crawl. The universe is 13.8 billion years old. As far as anyone can prove, it produced exactly one place where matter learned to look back at itself. Lose this planet and the cosmos doesn’t lose a species. It loses its only witness. Maybe that’s why the sky is so quiet. Maybe everyone else ran out of time before they ran out of planet. Musk: “We can be out there among the stars, making science fiction no longer fiction.” For 4.5 billion years, extinction was a verdict with no appeal. We are the first species that can answer back. Curtains or the stars. For the first time in the history of life, it’s a choice.
1:41

Elon Musk is trying to solve a problem with a perfect record against every living thing that has ever existed. Extinction. Undefeated. 4.5 billion years without a single loss. But it has only ever fought life that couldn’t leave. Musk: “The fundamental fork in the road for human destiny is where Mars can continue to grow even if the supply ships from Earth stop coming for any reason.” Over 99% of all species that have ever lived are gone. Every single one died on the planet where it was born. The dinosaurs ran Earth for 165 million years. Dominance, scale, deep time. None of it mattered. One rock from the sky ended it all in an afternoon. They didn’t lack strength. They lacked a second address. Musk: “If we only have one planet, then that could be curtains.” Curtains. One word for the end of every poem, every equation, every name ever spoken. All of it stored on one rock, orbiting one star, with no copy anywhere in the universe. Engineers learned this a century ago. One server is a hobby. Two is a system. We run an entire species on one server. Musk: “Mars can potentially come to the rescue of Earth. Or maybe Earth can come to the rescue of Mars.” People get this exactly backwards. Mars is not an escape pod. You don’t copy something because you hate the original. You copy it because it is irreplaceable. Earth is not being abandoned. Earth is the thing being protected. Life has done this before. 375 million years ago, something dragged itself out of the ocean. Not fleeing the water. Refusing to stay in the only medium it had ever known. Every forest, every bird, every human descends from that single refusal. Mars is the second crawl. The universe is 13.8 billion years old. As far as anyone can prove, it produced exactly one place where matter learned to look back at itself. Lose this planet and the cosmos doesn’t lose a species. It loses its only witness. Maybe that’s why the sky is so quiet. Maybe everyone else ran out of time before they ran out of planet. Musk: “We can be out there among the stars, making science fiction no longer fiction.” For 4.5 billion years, extinction was a verdict with no appeal. We are the first species that can answer back. Curtains or the stars. For the first time in the history of life, it’s a choice.

Dustin

13,532 次观看 • 1 个月前

4,500 years ago, on this island, people walked their pigs from Scotland to Wiltshire. 🇬🇧🏛️ They came from the Scottish highlands, the mountains of Wales and the moors of the north. And they brought their pigs with them. Bones found by archaeologists at Durrington Walls, right next to Stonehenge, told the story. The teeth of those pigs locked in the chemistry of the water they drank and the grass they ate. The chemistry was Scottish. The chemistry was Welsh. The chemistry was northern English. The animals weren't local. They had been brought hundreds of miles. And carcasses don't survive a journey that long. They walked. People drove herds from one end of these islands to the other. On foot. Every year. To meet at the same place at the same time. Britain already had engineered roads by then. Older than the pyramids of Egypt. We've told that story before. But this was a different problem. Bringing whole herds. From Scotland. From Wales. From the north. To one place. At one time of year. Every year. For generations. We have found no maps. No written language. No way to send word ahead. How do you think they did it? We don't fully know. But here's what we do know. These British islands were a community before they were a country. ⏳ Lets keep that spirit going. 🙏🇬🇧 Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us.🙏🇬🇧
2:41

4,500 years ago, on this island, people walked their pigs from Scotland to Wiltshire. 🇬🇧🏛️ They came from the Scottish highlands, the mountains of Wales and the moors of the north. And they brought their pigs with them. Bones found by archaeologists at Durrington Walls, right next to Stonehenge, told the story. The teeth of those pigs locked in the chemistry of the water they drank and the grass they ate. The chemistry was Scottish. The chemistry was Welsh. The chemistry was northern English. The animals weren't local. They had been brought hundreds of miles. And carcasses don't survive a journey that long. They walked. People drove herds from one end of these islands to the other. On foot. Every year. To meet at the same place at the same time. Britain already had engineered roads by then. Older than the pyramids of Egypt. We've told that story before. But this was a different problem. Bringing whole herds. From Scotland. From Wales. From the north. To one place. At one time of year. Every year. For generations. We have found no maps. No written language. No way to send word ahead. How do you think they did it? We don't fully know. But here's what we do know. These British islands were a community before they were a country. ⏳ Lets keep that spirit going. 🙏🇬🇧 Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us.🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

44,633 次观看 • 2 个月前

Marc Andreessen just explained why being right about AI for 80 straight years is about to be the most dangerous position in technology. Andreessen: “The four most dangerous words in investing are ‘this time is different.’” He’s talking about AI. And he’s about to turn that phrase on the people hiding behind it. Four times in 80 years, AI promised to change everything. Four times it collapsed. 1943.First neural network. Dead within a decade. 1944.Dartmouth. Scientists thought they’d crack AGI in one summer. They didn’t crack it in forty years. 1980s. Over a billion into expert systems. Entire market gone by ’87. 2016.Machine learning. Faded before anyone could ship a product. The skeptics weren’t lucky. They were 4-for-4. Every generation that believed “this time is different” got buried. And that is exactly why this moment is so dangerous. Because being right four consecutive times doesn’t just build a position. It builds an identity. And identity doesn’t update when the evidence does. Andreessen: “I’ll tell you what’s different. Like, now it’s working.” Not one breakthrough. Four. In the same window. Language. Reasoning. Coding. Self-improvement. All deployed. All producing revenue. Not in a lab. In the economy. Today. Then the line that should have ended every remaining debate. Andreessen: “If Linus Torvalds is saying that the AI coding is now better than he is… that’s never happened before.” The man who built the operating system the internet runs on just conceded the machine writes better code than he does. Coding is the highest bar in technology. If AI clears it, everything below was already decided. But the fourth breakthrough isn’t like the other three. Language, reasoning, and coding are capabilities. Self-improvement is a rate of change. The machine is researching, coding, and optimizing itself. No human engineers in the loop. Every technology in human history advanced at the speed of the people building it. This one just left that constraint behind. And the hardware confirms it. Nvidia’s old chips are gaining value after shipping. GPUs sold out years ahead. That has never happened in computing. Hardware doesn’t appreciate. Unless the market has decided this isn’t a cycle. It’s infrastructure. Andreessen: “This is the culmination of 80 years worth of work and this is the time it’s becoming real.” Eighty years. Researchers poured entire careers into this problem. Some of them died before it worked. And now all four pieces arrived at once. The skeptics built a perfect model from eight decades of collapse. Flawless pattern recognition. But a perfect model trained on a world that no longer exists doesn’t protect you. It traps you inside the last version of reality. For 80 years, doubting AI was the most rational position a human being could hold. It just became the most expensive.
2:04

Marc Andreessen just explained why being right about AI for 80 straight years is about to be the most dangerous position in technology. Andreessen: “The four most dangerous words in investing are ‘this time is different.’” He’s talking about AI. And he’s about to turn that phrase on the people hiding behind it. Four times in 80 years, AI promised to change everything. Four times it collapsed. 1943.First neural network. Dead within a decade. 1944.Dartmouth. Scientists thought they’d crack AGI in one summer. They didn’t crack it in forty years. 1980s. Over a billion into expert systems. Entire market gone by ’87. 2016.Machine learning. Faded before anyone could ship a product. The skeptics weren’t lucky. They were 4-for-4. Every generation that believed “this time is different” got buried. And that is exactly why this moment is so dangerous. Because being right four consecutive times doesn’t just build a position. It builds an identity. And identity doesn’t update when the evidence does. Andreessen: “I’ll tell you what’s different. Like, now it’s working.” Not one breakthrough. Four. In the same window. Language. Reasoning. Coding. Self-improvement. All deployed. All producing revenue. Not in a lab. In the economy. Today. Then the line that should have ended every remaining debate. Andreessen: “If Linus Torvalds is saying that the AI coding is now better than he is… that’s never happened before.” The man who built the operating system the internet runs on just conceded the machine writes better code than he does. Coding is the highest bar in technology. If AI clears it, everything below was already decided. But the fourth breakthrough isn’t like the other three. Language, reasoning, and coding are capabilities. Self-improvement is a rate of change. The machine is researching, coding, and optimizing itself. No human engineers in the loop. Every technology in human history advanced at the speed of the people building it. This one just left that constraint behind. And the hardware confirms it. Nvidia’s old chips are gaining value after shipping. GPUs sold out years ahead. That has never happened in computing. Hardware doesn’t appreciate. Unless the market has decided this isn’t a cycle. It’s infrastructure. Andreessen: “This is the culmination of 80 years worth of work and this is the time it’s becoming real.” Eighty years. Researchers poured entire careers into this problem. Some of them died before it worked. And now all four pieces arrived at once. The skeptics built a perfect model from eight decades of collapse. Flawless pattern recognition. But a perfect model trained on a world that no longer exists doesn’t protect you. It traps you inside the last version of reality. For 80 years, doubting AI was the most rational position a human being could hold. It just became the most expensive.

Dustin

13,381 次观看 • 13 天前

This woman who spent 10 full years as a CPS social worker in Kansas sits down and starts talking about what really happens behind the scenes. She says they could take any family’s information — no need to make anything up — and simply cherry-pick the facts, cut and paste them, twist them just right… and suddenly that family would meet the exact criteria for having their children removed and placed into foster care. It wasn’t some wild power trip. It was a calm conversation with her supervisor about how much control social workers actually have over the narrative that decides a family’s fate. Then comes the horrible twist. Two years after she left CPS… she herself was investigated by CPS and the police. The same rigid control of the narrative, the same cherry-picking and twisting of facts that she once helped wield… was now being used against her. She couldn’t overcome it. If this is true, it’s heartbreaking to think of all the vulnerable families that have been affected by a system that can twist the facts so easily.
1:36

This woman who spent 10 full years as a CPS social worker in Kansas sits down and starts talking about what really happens behind the scenes. She says they could take any family’s information — no need to make anything up — and simply cherry-pick the facts, cut and paste them, twist them just right… and suddenly that family would meet the exact criteria for having their children removed and placed into foster care. It wasn’t some wild power trip. It was a calm conversation with her supervisor about how much control social workers actually have over the narrative that decides a family’s fate. Then comes the horrible twist. Two years after she left CPS… she herself was investigated by CPS and the police. The same rigid control of the narrative, the same cherry-picking and twisting of facts that she once helped wield… was now being used against her. She couldn’t overcome it. If this is true, it’s heartbreaking to think of all the vulnerable families that have been affected by a system that can twist the facts so easily.

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

38,253 次观看 • 3 个月前

To have a state, there's a simple test. It's called the Montevideo test. It comes from the Montevideo Convention in 1933, and it's a four-part, four-element test. The four elements are: 1. Do you have a defined population? 2. Do you have defined borders? 3. Do you have the capacity to conduct foreign relations? 4. Do you have a single effective government? There's a couple things to understand about this. The first thing is that Israel, despite being called an illegitimate state, is actually a very old country. I don't mean ancient Israel. I mean, the Israel that was founded in 1948 was founded at a time when there were only 58 countries in the world. It became the 59th state. So people always say, "Oh, this newfangled creation, Israel." No, no, no. Israel's older than roughly two-thirds of all the countries in the world. And in fact, it was created in precisely the same way and at about the same time as many of the decolonized states in the world that were just drawn as lines on the map by European colonialist powers. It's the same thing with many of the Arab countries. Iraq was drawn up that way. Lebanon was definitely drawn up that way. Syria was drawn up that way with no regard for their indigenous, in many cases, local minority populations. Lots of countries in Africa were created this way. Cameroon was created this way. Part of South Africa and Botswana were split off this way. We could talk forever about the dozens of countries that were created just the same way Israel was, and nobody ever protests them because there's no Jews there, right? So there's nothing to protest. The point here is that Israel met in 1948, and has met every second of every day since then until today, all four of the Montevideo Factors.
3:24

To have a state, there's a simple test. It's called the Montevideo test. It comes from the Montevideo Convention in 1933, and it's a four-part, four-element test. The four elements are: 1. Do you have a defined population? 2. Do you have defined borders? 3. Do you have the capacity to conduct foreign relations? 4. Do you have a single effective government? There's a couple things to understand about this. The first thing is that Israel, despite being called an illegitimate state, is actually a very old country. I don't mean ancient Israel. I mean, the Israel that was founded in 1948 was founded at a time when there were only 58 countries in the world. It became the 59th state. So people always say, "Oh, this newfangled creation, Israel." No, no, no. Israel's older than roughly two-thirds of all the countries in the world. And in fact, it was created in precisely the same way and at about the same time as many of the decolonized states in the world that were just drawn as lines on the map by European colonialist powers. It's the same thing with many of the Arab countries. Iraq was drawn up that way. Lebanon was definitely drawn up that way. Syria was drawn up that way with no regard for their indigenous, in many cases, local minority populations. Lots of countries in Africa were created this way. Cameroon was created this way. Part of South Africa and Botswana were split off this way. We could talk forever about the dozens of countries that were created just the same way Israel was, and nobody ever protests them because there's no Jews there, right? So there's nothing to protest. The point here is that Israel met in 1948, and has met every second of every day since then until today, all four of the Montevideo Factors.

Roy K. Altman

55,181 次观看 • 1 个月前

This was quite unexpected: we were driving around in France's Somme département and suddenly we saw a sign "Chinese cemetery" in the middle of farmland. We went to check it out and it turns out it was a cemetery for 842 Chinese men brought here by the British during WW1 as part of the "Chinese Labour Corps." 150,000 men in total were brought to Europe (the immense majority in France) as part of these Chinese Labour Corps. Those men were working here in farmland and factories and, surprisingly, looking at the dates on the tombstones, most of them died AFTER the war ended, meaning they stayed here during several years after the end of the war. As the sign explains they were kept in a camp garded by the British and only had the right to leave the camp by groups guarded by a British officer, so much so that the locals considered them prisoners. My wife told me they had learned about this history at school in China but I personally learned about it just today. I had no idea so many Chinese labourers were brought to France and I certainly wouldn't have expected they were still toiling in camps after the war ended.
14:59

This was quite unexpected: we were driving around in France's Somme département and suddenly we saw a sign "Chinese cemetery" in the middle of farmland. We went to check it out and it turns out it was a cemetery for 842 Chinese men brought here by the British during WW1 as part of the "Chinese Labour Corps." 150,000 men in total were brought to Europe (the immense majority in France) as part of these Chinese Labour Corps. Those men were working here in farmland and factories and, surprisingly, looking at the dates on the tombstones, most of them died AFTER the war ended, meaning they stayed here during several years after the end of the war. As the sign explains they were kept in a camp garded by the British and only had the right to leave the camp by groups guarded by a British officer, so much so that the locals considered them prisoners. My wife told me they had learned about this history at school in China but I personally learned about it just today. I had no idea so many Chinese labourers were brought to France and I certainly wouldn't have expected they were still toiling in camps after the war ended.

Arnaud Bertrand

18,230 次观看 • 11 个月前

2001. Larry Page and Sergey Brin sit for their first-ever television interview. Google has 200 employees. They explain that the company almost didn't get off the ground because they couldn't cash a check. The check was for $100,000. It came from Andy Bechtolsheim, one of the co-founders of Sun Microsystems. Page and Brin showed him what they'd built. He said, "This is great, how about I write you a check?" and just wrote it out. Made it out to Google. The problem was that Google didn't exist as a company yet. There was no bank account. No lawyers. No incorporation paperwork. The check sat in Larry Page's desk drawer for a month. They literally could not deposit it. They're both in their late twenties in this interview. They met at Stanford as PhD students and, by their own account, disliked each other from the start. Brin says Page is "kind of obnoxious." Page doesn't disagree. Brin says they argued about everything, debated every single point, and then realized that was their commonality. They became friends, started building a search engine they never planned to build, and put their PhDs on hold to get it out into the world. The part that stings watching this in 2026 is the rejection tour. Before starting Google, they approached existing search companies to sell or license the technology. They went to Yahoo. David Filo, one of Yahoo's founders, told them, "This is great search technology. Why don't you guys make a company, and maybe we'll use you someday?" They went to Excite. They went to InfoSeek. Same response. Page says a CEO at one of those companies told them: "If our search is 85% as good as the next guy's, that's good enough for us." Page and Brin didn't buy that. They thought the search was too important to be 85% as good. So they started Google. No marketing. No ad campaign. They launched it at Stanford, and it grew 20% per month, every single month, for three years straight. Pure word of mouth. By the time of this interview, they're handling over 100 million searches a day. They get 500 resumes in the mail every single day. The office space around them is 30% vacant because the dot-com bubble just popped, but Google is profitable. Page makes a point of this: "We've been really interested in being profitable, like long before it was fashionable." They'd also just hired Eric Schmidt, former CTO of Sun, as CEO. Brin's explanation for why: "Parental supervision, to be honest." Page adds that they're "past the age where we're rebellious" and that running a search engine used by 100 million people a day with 200 employees is "a large responsibility." The number that caught my eye: when Google started in 1998, it indexed 30 million web pages. At the time of this interview, three years later, they indexed 1.3 billion. The page says that if you printed them all out and stacked the paper, it would be about 70 miles high. And it was doubling every year. Every search company they approached turned them down. Yahoo eventually came back and hired Google to power its own search results. The CEO who thought 85% was good enough ran a company that no longer exists. Alphabet, Google's parent company, is worth about $3.6 trillion today. It has about 190,000 employees. That $100,000 check sat in a desk drawer because nobody had incorporated the company. Bechtolsheim's stake from that investment is now worth billions.
14:09

2001. Larry Page and Sergey Brin sit for their first-ever television interview. Google has 200 employees. They explain that the company almost didn't get off the ground because they couldn't cash a check. The check was for $100,000. It came from Andy Bechtolsheim, one of the co-founders of Sun Microsystems. Page and Brin showed him what they'd built. He said, "This is great, how about I write you a check?" and just wrote it out. Made it out to Google. The problem was that Google didn't exist as a company yet. There was no bank account. No lawyers. No incorporation paperwork. The check sat in Larry Page's desk drawer for a month. They literally could not deposit it. They're both in their late twenties in this interview. They met at Stanford as PhD students and, by their own account, disliked each other from the start. Brin says Page is "kind of obnoxious." Page doesn't disagree. Brin says they argued about everything, debated every single point, and then realized that was their commonality. They became friends, started building a search engine they never planned to build, and put their PhDs on hold to get it out into the world. The part that stings watching this in 2026 is the rejection tour. Before starting Google, they approached existing search companies to sell or license the technology. They went to Yahoo. David Filo, one of Yahoo's founders, told them, "This is great search technology. Why don't you guys make a company, and maybe we'll use you someday?" They went to Excite. They went to InfoSeek. Same response. Page says a CEO at one of those companies told them: "If our search is 85% as good as the next guy's, that's good enough for us." Page and Brin didn't buy that. They thought the search was too important to be 85% as good. So they started Google. No marketing. No ad campaign. They launched it at Stanford, and it grew 20% per month, every single month, for three years straight. Pure word of mouth. By the time of this interview, they're handling over 100 million searches a day. They get 500 resumes in the mail every single day. The office space around them is 30% vacant because the dot-com bubble just popped, but Google is profitable. Page makes a point of this: "We've been really interested in being profitable, like long before it was fashionable." They'd also just hired Eric Schmidt, former CTO of Sun, as CEO. Brin's explanation for why: "Parental supervision, to be honest." Page adds that they're "past the age where we're rebellious" and that running a search engine used by 100 million people a day with 200 employees is "a large responsibility." The number that caught my eye: when Google started in 1998, it indexed 30 million web pages. At the time of this interview, three years later, they indexed 1.3 billion. The page says that if you printed them all out and stacked the paper, it would be about 70 miles high. And it was doubling every year. Every search company they approached turned them down. Yahoo eventually came back and hired Google to power its own search results. The CEO who thought 85% was good enough ran a company that no longer exists. Alphabet, Google's parent company, is worth about $3.6 trillion today. It has about 190,000 employees. That $100,000 check sat in a desk drawer because nobody had incorporated the company. Bechtolsheim's stake from that investment is now worth billions.

Anish Moonka

12,042 次观看 • 3 个月前

Russia is not a Christian country—it is jihadism, it is chauvinism, and it is closer to fascism than to Christianity. The sermons of Patriarch Kirill are not about love, not about the Bible, not about Jesus, but about hatred of Ukraine, hatred of the West. The Russian Patriarch Kirill never quotes the Bible, only fake Russian history. It reminds one of Plato’s cave, where the shadows of propaganda are passed off as truth, while true spirituality—as in the case of Ukraine—becomes the object of persecution. What is the real reason for Russia’s attack on Ukraine? Everyone even slightly educated knows that there are no Nazis, no Satanists, no coups in Ukraine, and there never were—just as there was no NATO expansion that Russia supposedly fears (Putin himself has repeatedly admitted this is not the issue). The only reason for the invasion is Ukraine’s light, its spirituality. A declining Russia cannot tolerate the spiritual growth and development of its neighbor. Russia, the largest country in the world, which has not even developed its own land—where there are wastelands, no roads, no infrastructure—keeps seizing new territories out of greed, waging war with the killing of civilians, the abduction of children, the execution of prisoners of war, and the use of banned weapons. What kind of religion is that? And now think about those who defend the Moscow Patriarchate—who are they really, and whom do they truly serve?
1:18

Russia is not a Christian country—it is jihadism, it is chauvinism, and it is closer to fascism than to Christianity. The sermons of Patriarch Kirill are not about love, not about the Bible, not about Jesus, but about hatred of Ukraine, hatred of the West. The Russian Patriarch Kirill never quotes the Bible, only fake Russian history. It reminds one of Plato’s cave, where the shadows of propaganda are passed off as truth, while true spirituality—as in the case of Ukraine—becomes the object of persecution. What is the real reason for Russia’s attack on Ukraine? Everyone even slightly educated knows that there are no Nazis, no Satanists, no coups in Ukraine, and there never were—just as there was no NATO expansion that Russia supposedly fears (Putin himself has repeatedly admitted this is not the issue). The only reason for the invasion is Ukraine’s light, its spirituality. A declining Russia cannot tolerate the spiritual growth and development of its neighbor. Russia, the largest country in the world, which has not even developed its own land—where there are wastelands, no roads, no infrastructure—keeps seizing new territories out of greed, waging war with the killing of civilians, the abduction of children, the execution of prisoners of war, and the use of banned weapons. What kind of religion is that? And now think about those who defend the Moscow Patriarchate—who are they really, and whom do they truly serve?

Devana 🇺🇦

25,685 次观看 • 10 个月前

Elon Musk just scored human civilization on the only scale the universe keeps. Zero. Musk: “We’re practically nowhere on the Kardashev scale. Not registering.” The Kardashev scale measures one thing. How much energy a civilization captures from its star. Type 1 harnesses its planet. Type 2 harnesses its star. Humanity is not Type 1. We are so far below it the math rounds to nothing. A trillion is a million times a million. That is the gap. Every reactor ever built. Every barrel of oil ever burned. Every grid on every continent. Rounding error. Three centuries of industrial progress. Not a flicker on the only scale that tracks whether a civilization is real. Oil is just old sunlight. We killed each other for the crumbs. The sun throws 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts into empty space. Earth intercepts one two-billionth of that. We harness a fraction of even that. The rest hits nothing. Warms nothing. Powers nothing. The offer has stood for four billion years. Musk: “Even one millionth of what the sun outputs. Extremely kickass civilization.” One millionth would make us gods by current standards. We are not at one millionth. We are fighting over condensation on a fire hose. And that is the most hopeful fact about our species. We mistook the floor for the ceiling. Musk: “Launch satellites to orbit Earth and capture solar power. Avoids the need to build massive power plants on Earth.” This is not a policy position. It is a coordinate change. Institutions don’t scale. Physics does. Bureaucracies were designed to manage scarcity. They have no operating manual for abundance. So they fight it. Because abundance makes gatekeepers unemployed. Everything we call history happened in the dark. Every atom in your body was forged inside a star. You are not reaching for something foreign. You are the sun’s output reaching back for the sun. It poured out an empire for four billion years. No one showed up to claim it. Until now.
0:52

Elon Musk just scored human civilization on the only scale the universe keeps. Zero. Musk: “We’re practically nowhere on the Kardashev scale. Not registering.” The Kardashev scale measures one thing. How much energy a civilization captures from its star. Type 1 harnesses its planet. Type 2 harnesses its star. Humanity is not Type 1. We are so far below it the math rounds to nothing. A trillion is a million times a million. That is the gap. Every reactor ever built. Every barrel of oil ever burned. Every grid on every continent. Rounding error. Three centuries of industrial progress. Not a flicker on the only scale that tracks whether a civilization is real. Oil is just old sunlight. We killed each other for the crumbs. The sun throws 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts into empty space. Earth intercepts one two-billionth of that. We harness a fraction of even that. The rest hits nothing. Warms nothing. Powers nothing. The offer has stood for four billion years. Musk: “Even one millionth of what the sun outputs. Extremely kickass civilization.” One millionth would make us gods by current standards. We are not at one millionth. We are fighting over condensation on a fire hose. And that is the most hopeful fact about our species. We mistook the floor for the ceiling. Musk: “Launch satellites to orbit Earth and capture solar power. Avoids the need to build massive power plants on Earth.” This is not a policy position. It is a coordinate change. Institutions don’t scale. Physics does. Bureaucracies were designed to manage scarcity. They have no operating manual for abundance. So they fight it. Because abundance makes gatekeepers unemployed. Everything we call history happened in the dark. Every atom in your body was forged inside a star. You are not reaching for something foreign. You are the sun’s output reaching back for the sun. It poured out an empire for four billion years. No one showed up to claim it. Until now.

Dustin

33,579 次观看 • 1 个月前

Three British scientists saved the ozone layer. 🇬🇧 NASA had a billion pound satellite watching the same sky. 🛰️ For seven years it collected atmospheric data over Antarctica. Every single day. The ozone was vanishing. Readings lower than anything ever recorded. Numbers that shouldn't exist. The software flagged them as errors. And deleted them. For years. Then three men at a tiny British research station on the ice noticed something the satellite's computers had thrown away. Halley Research Station. Brunt Ice Shelf. British Antarctic Survey. Joe Farman. Brian Gardiner. Jonathan Shanklin. No satellite. No supercomputer. A Dobson spectrophotometer on a wooden tripod. Brass fittings. Manual readings. A notebook. Their data said the ozone layer above Antarctica was disappearing. They didn't delete it. They published it. Nature. 16 May 1985. NASA went back. Reprocessed its own discarded data. The hole was real. It had been real for years. Within two years: the Montreal Protocol. 16 September 1987. Every country on Earth signed it. 198 parties. The only universally ratified treaty in human history. The ozone layer is now healing. Mid-latitudes by 2040. The Antarctic hole by 2066. A billion pound machine said the data was wrong. Three men in parkas said it wasn't. The sky is healing because they were right. We tell stories like this every week. No sponsors. No ads. Just people who believe Britain's history is worth knowing. Stand with us 👇 Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧
1:29

Three British scientists saved the ozone layer. 🇬🇧 NASA had a billion pound satellite watching the same sky. 🛰️ For seven years it collected atmospheric data over Antarctica. Every single day. The ozone was vanishing. Readings lower than anything ever recorded. Numbers that shouldn't exist. The software flagged them as errors. And deleted them. For years. Then three men at a tiny British research station on the ice noticed something the satellite's computers had thrown away. Halley Research Station. Brunt Ice Shelf. British Antarctic Survey. Joe Farman. Brian Gardiner. Jonathan Shanklin. No satellite. No supercomputer. A Dobson spectrophotometer on a wooden tripod. Brass fittings. Manual readings. A notebook. Their data said the ozone layer above Antarctica was disappearing. They didn't delete it. They published it. Nature. 16 May 1985. NASA went back. Reprocessed its own discarded data. The hole was real. It had been real for years. Within two years: the Montreal Protocol. 16 September 1987. Every country on Earth signed it. 198 parties. The only universally ratified treaty in human history. The ozone layer is now healing. Mid-latitudes by 2040. The Antarctic hole by 2066. A billion pound machine said the data was wrong. Three men in parkas said it wasn't. The sky is healing because they were right. We tell stories like this every week. No sponsors. No ads. Just people who believe Britain's history is worth knowing. Stand with us 👇 Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

33,891 次观看 • 4 个月前

Two completely independent lines of evidence are being laid side by side here, and they are telling the same story. On one side you have delta oxygen-18 isotope data from an ice core, one of the most reliable proxies available for reconstructing past temperature. On the other, a carbon-14 dated pollen study from Holland tracking vegetation changes across the last 100,000 years. When July temperatures dropped from around seven degrees centigrade down to five, the pollen record essentially collapses. No pollen means no vegetation. The landscape was stripped bare. What makes this worth paying attention to is not just the magnitude of that temperature drop but the fact that two entirely different methodologies, applied in two entirely different places, are capturing the same event. The Younger Dryas shows up in the ice core and it shows up in the pollen stratigraphy. When independent proxies converge like that, you are no longer looking at an artifact of any single technique. You are looking at something that actually happened, and the question then becomes what was powerful enough to cause it.
0:35

Two completely independent lines of evidence are being laid side by side here, and they are telling the same story. On one side you have delta oxygen-18 isotope data from an ice core, one of the most reliable proxies available for reconstructing past temperature. On the other, a carbon-14 dated pollen study from Holland tracking vegetation changes across the last 100,000 years. When July temperatures dropped from around seven degrees centigrade down to five, the pollen record essentially collapses. No pollen means no vegetation. The landscape was stripped bare. What makes this worth paying attention to is not just the magnitude of that temperature drop but the fact that two entirely different methodologies, applied in two entirely different places, are capturing the same event. The Younger Dryas shows up in the ice core and it shows up in the pollen stratigraphy. When independent proxies converge like that, you are no longer looking at an artifact of any single technique. You are looking at something that actually happened, and the question then becomes what was powerful enough to cause it.

Randall Carlson

11,770 次观看 • 1 个月前

I honestly have no words anymore! New depths of squalor from Italian Journalists Milena Gabanelli, a well known investigate journalist, published data about the high number of suicides among IDF soldiers in the past two years. (Data published by the IDF. this isn't anything investigative) Touching new depths of cynicism she attributes all of the suicides to a "sense of guilt" for having participated in the harm done to the poor Gazans during the war. Not a word about who these young men were. Nothing about the losses they endured. Nothing about the fact that none of them ever wanted this war nor started it. Nothing about the friends they lost in battle. Not a word about who they lost at the Nova Festival on October 7th. Nothing about the anguish shared with the wounded, the paralyzed, the traumatized. We are talking about mostly 20-year-olds, kids basically, whose world has been shattered and that had to suffer a grief too terrible for their age. The dehumanization of the Israelis passes also through the denial of any possibility of their suffering. Israelis are monsters, and as such they can only hurt themselves because of the guilt they feel about their own monstrosity. I know Italians very well. They are usually extremely sensitive to anything related to grief. Speaking like this about people who committed suicide, about families who are experiencing the greatest tragedy anyone can imagine - the loss of a child by his own hands - is unheard of in Italy. It is one of the most sickening displays I've seen in recent years, of the depths of hate some people have in their hearts when it comes to the Jews.
0:36

I honestly have no words anymore! New depths of squalor from Italian Journalists Milena Gabanelli, a well known investigate journalist, published data about the high number of suicides among IDF soldiers in the past two years. (Data published by the IDF. this isn't anything investigative) Touching new depths of cynicism she attributes all of the suicides to a "sense of guilt" for having participated in the harm done to the poor Gazans during the war. Not a word about who these young men were. Nothing about the losses they endured. Nothing about the fact that none of them ever wanted this war nor started it. Nothing about the friends they lost in battle. Not a word about who they lost at the Nova Festival on October 7th. Nothing about the anguish shared with the wounded, the paralyzed, the traumatized. We are talking about mostly 20-year-olds, kids basically, whose world has been shattered and that had to suffer a grief too terrible for their age. The dehumanization of the Israelis passes also through the denial of any possibility of their suffering. Israelis are monsters, and as such they can only hurt themselves because of the guilt they feel about their own monstrosity. I know Italians very well. They are usually extremely sensitive to anything related to grief. Speaking like this about people who committed suicide, about families who are experiencing the greatest tragedy anyone can imagine - the loss of a child by his own hands - is unheard of in Italy. It is one of the most sickening displays I've seen in recent years, of the depths of hate some people have in their hearts when it comes to the Jews.

Hamas Atrocities

13,222 次观看 • 5 个月前