Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This is probably my most controversial episode to date. We keep hearing that Jane Doe’s behavior after the Cornell 7 incident was a “textbook trauma response.” But is that actually what the evidence shows? This is why we should all care what happens in this case. We see again,... show more

Hannah Spier, MD

10,335 subscribers

13,411 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

31 Yorum

Cezar Golescu profil fotoğrafı

Cezar Golescu2 gün önce

“Trauma response” is just an all-purpose term used to explain away anything a woman does, especially if the behavior in question doesn’t support the victim narrative.

Fluesterwitz profil fotoğrafı

Fluesterwitz1 gün önce

Jane Doe was literally shamed into 'identifying' as a victim of rape to become part of the 'sisterhood' again.

Hannah Spier, MD profil fotoğrafı

Hannah Spier, MD1 gün önce

That’s an accurate read I think

Marcus Ratnathicam profil fotoğrafı

Marcus Ratnathicam2 gün önce

Hannah the "textbook trauma response" comes from a particular theory called the "victim centered approach" that casts typically features of un-credible testimony (inconsistent statements, inability to recall timelines, delayed reporting, etc.) as a feature of trauma. THis theory is funded @ $140m/yr (federal money) to train state & fed law enforcement and judges in this trauma theory. The money continues still today and the theory is written in to fed statutes. Opposite of due process. Happy to share more.

Karma KΞN profil fotoğrafı

Karma KΞN2 gün önce

Video ends mid-sentence. Link the full version if available.

Karma KΞN profil fotoğrafı

Karma KΞN2 gün önce

Thanks, good vod. Feminist indoctrination has fully penetrated psychology and is halfway through "raping" law profession.

PEYTON profil fotoğrafı

PEYTON2 gün önce

Her trauma is from how her peers treated her when they learned what she had done with them. They tormented her. Harsssed her. And where was the support for her by women then? She had to say it was rape in order for them to back off her. I will stand on that hill and shout it loud

Challenge Everything profil fotoğrafı

Challenge Everything2 gün önce

@RobertSevenor9 Because the therapy industrial complex is based on victimhood. So turning into a pathological liar is considered part of the trauma response.

Silence profil fotoğrafı

Silence2 gün önce

Her actions after the fact track with regret, not trauma.

Grace Kane profil fotoğrafı

Grace Kane2 gün önce

More than one thing can be true. Trauma and trauma responses can be present without that exonerating an individual's willing participation in unusual activities.

Ralph L profil fotoğrafı

Ralph L1 gün önce

It's very bad for women's rights in the long run. Men are getting tired of arrogant and unaccountable women.

Basedndfedup profil fotoğrafı

Basedndfedup1 gün önce

🤨Is the trauma associated with the sexual act in question or with the consequences associated with what happened?🕶

Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠 profil fotoğrafı

Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠1 gün önce

The state of Psychology. "Research Papers" by the new head of the APA (American Psychological Association)

Esteban Leon profil fotoğrafı

Esteban Leon2 gün önce

I share a lot of your episodes to friends. You’re always on it!

brenda meeks fan account profil fotoğrafı

brenda meeks fan account2 gün önce

Hey stupid, it actually doesn’t fucking matter because she can’t negate her own fucking consent existed so consent is evaluated the time of actions they took place which you guys were aware of because you said you can’t revoke consent.

Joakim Marias profil fotoğrafı

Joakim Marias1 gün önce

Great that we are in agreement about Gabor.

BT profil fotoğrafı

BT2 gün önce

Does she exhibit behaviour similar to someone who is diagnosed with BPD?

Alien Icon profil fotoğrafı

Alien Icon1 gün önce

All you have to do is listen to her own words in chronological order.

scottabe profil fotoğrafı

scottabe1 gün önce

You just earned another follower. Great work (and I have a MA Psych degree, know quality when I read it.)

BO Jiden profil fotoğrafı

BO Jiden2 gün önce

Feminism is the overridding belief that all evil begins with men and all good is women and no facts,evidence nor a nuclear attack ,done, in error,illegally, by a Female President,with an all female staff,can shake .

S. Ohh profil fotoğrafı

S. Ohh1 gün önce

All psychology is just made up mish mash of subjective feelings by snake oil charlatans. Junk science nonsense and voodoo “medicine”. Astrology and tarot cards are just as effective, prob more because the stars are real.

IEPerez94 profil fotoğrafı

IEPerez941 gün önce

The trauma response argument holds little weight. What does, is the fact that she was operating under little or faulty info. Her actions are consistent with exposure to the context of what had actually developed

CheetoBath profil fotoğrafı

CheetoBath1 gün önce

The left likes to rewrite history to absolve themselves of any accountability.

Adam Ableman | We Need Real Elections profil fotoğrafı

Adam Ableman | We Need Real Elections1 gün önce

She didn't know what happened to her until she read it on an online forum. You're acting like she knew

Josh Anything profil fotoğrafı

Josh Anything1 gün önce

Jane Hoe sexually assaulted at least one boy, by sucking his cock whilst he was asleep, so NO CONSENT… that’s SA. Why do people only look for a woman’s consent… and not look for the man’s consent… We all have a right to be equal in the eyes of the law, why isn’t it applied…

Jack Brumby profil fotoğrafı

Jack Brumby2 gün önce

Are you asking the right questions? She's a bisexual testosterone addict who went to the frat house fully intending to sexually dominate some twinks? big dog flex high on t twinks

**CHAOS CLPWN** profil fotoğrafı

**CHAOS CLPWN**2 gün önce

Eat Harvard professorship MIT PhD shit @drfionagirkin

Hallouminati profil fotoğrafı

Hallouminati2 gün önce

Gut problems! I don’t know if that’s a common one, but sudden onset of gut problems in response to trigger like you’ve got IBS or a tummy bug when you have neither.

**CHAOS CLPWN** profil fotoğrafı

**CHAOS CLPWN**2 gün önce

Class act this one - hello @hannahspierMD ;oP ;oP

BO Jiden profil fotoğrafı

BO Jiden2 gün önce

I think we need a French Revolution Style Committee Of Expost Facto Consent Revocation where consent can be revoked up to 3 months or 100 guys composed of Karens,Lindsay Clancy Jury members and strippers.

Gaius profil fotoğrafı

Gaius1 gün önce

Not coincidentally, a study recently found that young men are increasingly anxious about having sex ("like defusing a bomb"):

Benzer Videolar

The evidence in the Cornell 7 case demonstrates clearly that Jane Doe engaged in promiscuous and disgusting sexual behavior (as did the men), was embarrassed by it, and then changed her story to allege rape. That’s not now rape law works. But now the NY governor is unleashing mob justice on the men.

The evidence in the Cornell 7 case demonstrates clearly that Jane Doe engaged in promiscuous and disgusting sexual behavior (as did the men), was embarrassed by it, and then changed her story to allege rape. That’s not now rape law works. But now the NY governor is unleashing mob justice on the men.

Ben Shapiro

510,328 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Kinzinger: To me, it was very personal, very, very difficult for my family and me. And so you see some of that in the film. But most importantly, what this is, is a warning to America. You’ll see this in the film again — we lay out a very compelling case against Trump. But it shows, again, that what I did wasn’t courageous — it was just my job. There is, though, an intense cost to that. You see that cost laid out in this film, and it shows why, when people say, “Why don’t other Republicans speak out?” — this brings home that there is a cost to doing so. And we need to, frankly, elect and hire people who are willing to do tough things

Kinzinger: To me, it was very personal, very, very difficult for my family and me. And so you see some of that in the film. But most importantly, what this is, is a warning to America. You’ll see this in the film again — we lay out a very compelling case against Trump. But it shows, again, that what I did wasn’t courageous — it was just my job. There is, though, an intense cost to that. You see that cost laid out in this film, and it shows why, when people say, “Why don’t other Republicans speak out?” — this brings home that there is a cost to doing so. And we need to, frankly, elect and hire people who are willing to do tough things

Acyn

151,606 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Tacopina: Tim Scott is someone who I used to respect, but I lost a lot of respect from what I just heard… To say that Biden brought this case is one of the most ridiculous things I've heard. We know that's not the case, and even Trump’s lawyers know that is not the case.

Tacopina: Tim Scott is someone who I used to respect, but I lost a lot of respect from what I just heard… To say that Biden brought this case is one of the most ridiculous things I've heard. We know that's not the case, and even Trump’s lawyers know that is not the case.

Acyn

861,717 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

"The rare part in these allegations are that the head coach was this direct in the tampering.. Is there actually hard evidence of this happening and that's what this is gonna come down to" Pete Thamel #PMSLive

"The rare part in these allegations are that the head coach was this direct in the tampering.. Is there actually hard evidence of this happening and that's what this is gonna come down to" Pete Thamel #PMSLive

Pat McAfee

298,901 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

"Now, I don't know if rape happened or not. I am completely open to the evidence that something like that did happen. The problem is when you say it's systematic mass rape & you repeat that over & over again, that implies that it was used as a weapon. It's dehumanizing propaganda that Hamas resistance fighters used rape as a weapon and as a tool. I have not seen any evidence of that. The LA Times had to retract the fact that that was put out there initially. The UN this investigative body that Jayapal is talking about that Israel needs to comply with -- they actually tried to conduct an investigation & went to Israeli authorities and said: show us the evidence for mass rape. We want to document this and they were called anti Semitic." - Abby Martin

"Now, I don't know if rape happened or not. I am completely open to the evidence that something like that did happen. The problem is when you say it's systematic mass rape & you repeat that over & over again, that implies that it was used as a weapon. It's dehumanizing propaganda that Hamas resistance fighters used rape as a weapon and as a tool. I have not seen any evidence of that. The LA Times had to retract the fact that that was put out there initially. The UN this investigative body that Jayapal is talking about that Israel needs to comply with -- they actually tried to conduct an investigation & went to Israeli authorities and said: show us the evidence for mass rape. We want to document this and they were called anti Semitic." - Abby Martin

Briahna Joy Gray

727,603 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Asmongold completely agrees with Nick Fuentes that we should throw all those involved in the Cornell 7 case in prison.. "It's literally bar for bar exactly what I said." "I think that what Nick identified is the reality that we will never unravel the Truth from this."

Asmongold completely agrees with Nick Fuentes that we should throw all those involved in the Cornell 7 case in prison.. "It's literally bar for bar exactly what I said." "I think that what Nick identified is the reality that we will never unravel the Truth from this."

KaizerRev

32,047 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”

RedWave Press

976,317 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”

Dr Charlie Ward

277,707 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."

Eric Daugherty

140,799 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The Cornell 7 case is getting a lot of attention on social media. Before I dive in, I want to make clear that I wasn’t there. I don’t know what happened. But I will say that posting “free pussy” in a group chat and having group sex with an inebriated girl is disgusting even if she did consent. Here are my early thoughts on what will happen with the case: I’m a former prosecutor who now represents victims, including filing civil lawsuits on behalf of rape victims. I believe them, and I understand the psychology of sexual assault and why such a small percentage of perpetrators are ever brought to justice. But when a District Attorney issues a public and detailed statement explaining why your own client’s statement shows she consented to the sexual activity, that’s bad for your case. Now why the DA would take a dump on a civil lawsuit to defend his office is a different question altogether, but maybe he felt there was too much pressure not to explain why he didn’t file charges. The DA saying the victim consented is a problem because unless you’re a minor or otherwise incapacitated (more on this below), consent is always a defense to sexual activity no matter how gross it is (like in the Diddy trial). So here, Jane Doe’s lawyer needs to argue that her previous statement or the DA’s interpretation thereof was wrong, which will be difficult. The better approach is to argue that Jane Doe was incapable of giving consent because she was in a k-hole or otherwise under the influence of alcohol and ketamine. Ketamine is a tranquilizer and dissociative after all. The defense, of course, will argue that this is regret, not rape, and a money grab. That’s what they always do. Based on the very limited evidence that has been made public so far, including the civil complaint, Snapchat screenshot, and DA summary of Jane Doe’s statement, I do not think the grand jury indicts, and I do not think we see criminal charges in this case. In fact, I think the DA is presenting the case to the grand jury so they return a no bill and give him political cover for not prosecuting the case. Think Nolan Wells and how the pressure subsided when the grand jury didn’t indict. With respect to the civil case, I think Cornell has a number of substantive defenses regarding foreseeability, superseding criminal acts, and comparative negligence, but I still think they settle this case quickly, confidentially, and for good money to make the public relations nightmare go away. It’s no secret that drug and alcohol use is rampant at fraternities and sororities, and sexual assault is a huge problem at universities. The last thing Cornell wants is discovery into the steps it takes to protect young women on campus and for talking heads like me to open cable news shows discussing the allegations that one of their former students was gang raped. Once the deep-pocket university settles, the remaining individual and entity defendants will resolve as well. If this is TLDR, I spoke to CNN about the legal strategy in the case by Jane Doe’s lawyer, the defense, and the prosecution.

The Cornell 7 case is getting a lot of attention on social media. Before I dive in, I want to make clear that I wasn’t there. I don’t know what happened. But I will say that posting “free pussy” in a group chat and having group sex with an inebriated girl is disgusting even if she did consent. Here are my early thoughts on what will happen with the case: I’m a former prosecutor who now represents victims, including filing civil lawsuits on behalf of rape victims. I believe them, and I understand the psychology of sexual assault and why such a small percentage of perpetrators are ever brought to justice. But when a District Attorney issues a public and detailed statement explaining why your own client’s statement shows she consented to the sexual activity, that’s bad for your case. Now why the DA would take a dump on a civil lawsuit to defend his office is a different question altogether, but maybe he felt there was too much pressure not to explain why he didn’t file charges. The DA saying the victim consented is a problem because unless you’re a minor or otherwise incapacitated (more on this below), consent is always a defense to sexual activity no matter how gross it is (like in the Diddy trial). So here, Jane Doe’s lawyer needs to argue that her previous statement or the DA’s interpretation thereof was wrong, which will be difficult. The better approach is to argue that Jane Doe was incapable of giving consent because she was in a k-hole or otherwise under the influence of alcohol and ketamine. Ketamine is a tranquilizer and dissociative after all. The defense, of course, will argue that this is regret, not rape, and a money grab. That’s what they always do. Based on the very limited evidence that has been made public so far, including the civil complaint, Snapchat screenshot, and DA summary of Jane Doe’s statement, I do not think the grand jury indicts, and I do not think we see criminal charges in this case. In fact, I think the DA is presenting the case to the grand jury so they return a no bill and give him political cover for not prosecuting the case. Think Nolan Wells and how the pressure subsided when the grand jury didn’t indict. With respect to the civil case, I think Cornell has a number of substantive defenses regarding foreseeability, superseding criminal acts, and comparative negligence, but I still think they settle this case quickly, confidentially, and for good money to make the public relations nightmare go away. It’s no secret that drug and alcohol use is rampant at fraternities and sororities, and sexual assault is a huge problem at universities. The last thing Cornell wants is discovery into the steps it takes to protect young women on campus and for talking heads like me to open cable news shows discussing the allegations that one of their former students was gang raped. Once the deep-pocket university settles, the remaining individual and entity defendants will resolve as well. If this is TLDR, I spoke to CNN about the legal strategy in the case by Jane Doe’s lawyer, the defense, and the prosecution.

Neama Rahmani

168,670 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

697,242 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

HOLY CRAP! This retired FBI Special Agent just claimed that Tyler Robinson's defense is fighting against a "MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE." "To your point about the DNA, look, DNA is a nascent technology. The first time that this was ever used in an American case to prove somebody guilty was in 1987. It deals with statistics and theory of probability and, and things like that." "But they are laying this out, the defense, and they're SHOWING THEIR HAND. And I think this is going to blow up because there is a mountain of evidence in this case, not just a little bit, a mountain of evidence."

HOLY CRAP! This retired FBI Special Agent just claimed that Tyler Robinson's defense is fighting against a "MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE." "To your point about the DNA, look, DNA is a nascent technology. The first time that this was ever used in an American case to prove somebody guilty was in 1987. It deals with statistics and theory of probability and, and things like that." "But they are laying this out, the defense, and they're SHOWING THEIR HAND. And I think this is going to blow up because there is a mountain of evidence in this case, not just a little bit, a mountain of evidence."

Gunther Eagleman™

53,081 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

There is explosive new information in the Cornell gang rape case. Tune in to TMZ and New York Post's YouTube show, “The Low Down” to learn what "Jane Doe" told police. Watch:

There is explosive new information in the Cornell gang rape case. Tune in to TMZ and New York Post's YouTube show, “The Low Down” to learn what "Jane Doe" told police. Watch:

TMZ

47,135 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

One of the NYT reporters who obtained 1,000+ pages of material from Cornell University's investigation of the alleged gang rape at a fraternity house shares what the docs reveal about the case and how “Jane Doe’s” perception of the alleged incident shifted in the weeks that followed.

One of the NYT reporters who obtained 1,000+ pages of material from Cornell University's investigation of the alleged gang rape at a fraternity house shares what the docs reveal about the case and how “Jane Doe’s” perception of the alleged incident shifted in the weeks that followed.

Erin Burnett OutFront

15,865 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

.Rep. Justin Jones: "“We still have Democrats were acting like this is early 2000 politics. That world of normalcy is gone. This is a war for the future of our democracy. And the South is the front line in that battle… I would say to the governors and to the lawmakers in those [blue] states that this is a moment to put our morals above our manners. What is moral is to act, not just for us, but for generations who are counting on us, what we do in this moment. I think we're going to be judged not by what we do, but by what we don't do.”

.Rep. Justin Jones: "“We still have Democrats were acting like this is early 2000 politics. That world of normalcy is gone. This is a war for the future of our democracy. And the South is the front line in that battle… I would say to the governors and to the lawmakers in those [blue] states that this is a moment to put our morals above our manners. What is moral is to act, not just for us, but for generations who are counting on us, what we do in this moment. I think we're going to be judged not by what we do, but by what we don't do.”

BTC Clips

114,246 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce