Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

THIS is probably the funniest founder ad I've seen. But there is a reason why. It comes from the founder's Point of View (POV). He actually had the problem. And he stole it from The Dollar Shave Club ad. It's his mission to add value to his community. Here...

10,577 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 8

Фото профиля Aazar Shad
Aazar Shad2 лет назад

Here's the script. I also listened to his pod and he shared: 1. They launch 300+ ads and find one winner. 2. He is just the 5% of the ads. 3. This ad blew up on Youtube more. 4. He asks comedians to write his scripts, not copywriters. 5. He learned how to do such content from the ads brands and influencers. Apply all this and win today. ANYONE can learn from such ads. If he can steal good ad formats and style, why shouldn't you?

Фото профиля Pauline Riviere
Pauline Riviere2 лет назад

Really have been looking forward to your emails lately, so much value delivered 👏

Фото профиля Aazar Shad
Aazar Shad2 лет назад

this makes my day! :) So happy. If you have to describe my newsletter with a one-word value prop what would that be?

Фото профиля Value Maverick
Value Maverick2 лет назад

It is horrible.

Фото профиля Aazar Shad
Aazar Shad2 лет назад

Why?

Фото профиля It's Always Eboue
It's Always Eboue2 лет назад

There's a marketing agency in Australia, run by some marketing guru named Sabri (I think) who made a fantastic founder ad that parodies this type of founder ads....where the founder keeps walking forward while trying to say smart-funny things while doing random funny stuff (1/2)

Фото профиля Fraser Cottrell | Ad Creative For Meta & TikTok
Fraser Cottrell | Ad Creative For Meta & TikTok2 лет назад

but the voices don't sound great hahahah

Фото профиля Aazar Shad
Aazar Shad2 лет назад

haha! well, authenticity :p

Похожие видео

🤔 The rifle drop location of the leftist who assassinated Charlie Kirk has been revealed. From the video which cuts off…we can see him waiting at the intersection. So not to be semantical but the diagram showing him cut across the parking lot isn’t accurate because he walks along the pathway. So it appears Tyler Robinson walked across the street and “HID” the Mauser in that vicinity and then walked to his car. My only question is if he knew in his own words that his father would notice the gun missing and have to come back to collect it WHY NOT JUST TAKE IT WITH YOU TO YOUR VEHICLE AND REMOVE THAT FROM THE EQUATION? He seemed to smuggle the weapon in there with NO PROBLEM hidden well enough and with all the commotion getting back to your car with the weapon would be a priority. We have heard routinely that he is NOT a stupid person so he would know that after committing the most high profile ASSASSINATION in the 21st century w/ cameras everywhere of a personal friend of The President that no stone would be unturned. So DID HE REALLY THINK HE WOULD BE ABLE TO RETURN TO A CAMPUS THAT WOULD BE ON LOCKDOWN HOURS LATER TO RETRIEVE IT? That doesn’t sound like a MENSA move to me. I’ll leave my post here also from 9/12 when his father turned him in where I said AT BARE MINIMUM HE WOULD HAVE KNOWN HIS DAD WOULD KNOW ITS MISSING. Why use the terminology “DROP POINT” as if it’s an OP as opposed to saying “I hid or stashed it”? Just little details like that stand out to me. Take it with you at this point don’t drop it a hundred feet away from a crime of the century.

Johnny St.Pete

45,016 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. Why Does Evil Dominate the World? — John MacArthur // March 4, 2007 If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it – listen - and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? And I would ask you this: would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is in complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people. So, what do we know up to now? Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. This is critical: He had a purpose for evil. What is that purpose that God had for evil? Before I answer that question - and that’s the fourth in our little outline - let me read the Westminster Confession from the 1700s; some great theologians and biblical scholars put this together. Listen carefully: “God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass:“ Yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away ... sinfulness proceeds not only from the creature; proceeds only from the creature and not from God, who, being most holy and righteous, neither ... can be the author and approver of sin.” But then, says the Westminster Confession, all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory - and they got it right.The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory. Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the question - the bigger question: is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Pretty easy question to answer, isn’t it? That really is the ultimate question. Throughout all the eons of eternity, will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed or less? And, friends, that’s really all that matters, is the eternal glory of God. So, it’s fourth down, and we’re on the ten-yard line, and I’m pulling out the winning play and we’re going for six for the victory. Turn to Romans 3 - and I want you to track with me a little bit; can’t take time to develop all of this, but I’m going to give you a good start. Wish I could build context; we don’t have time. But let’s look at chapter 3 and verse 5. Opening statement: “But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say?” Grab that phrase: our right - unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. And Paul uses the first of a series of verbs; this one happens to be sunistēmi, translated demonstrates in the New American Standard. It is a verb that means to disclose, to reveal, to put on display, to show. Our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. Another way to say that would be, would you really understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness? Isn’t there something to be gained by the contrast? Paul has been showing that God is faithful to His promises to Israel, and their sin and unbelief cannot alter God’s covenant, cannot alter God’s faithfulness.

Terri Green

24,466 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад