Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This is ridiculous. Not answering a question should automatically disqualify a candidate from the job.

121,217 views โ€ข 1 year ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Nat's profile picture
Nat1 year ago

She was absolutely fantastic. Measured. Tough. Higher office some day?

Piyush Mittal ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช๐ŸŸง๐ŸŒŠ๐ŸŒˆ's profile picture
Piyush Mittal ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช๐ŸŸง๐ŸŒŠ๐ŸŒˆ1 year ago

She was in the CIA. And the State Department and DoD.

The Liberation Project's profile picture
The Liberation Project1 year ago

๐‘ผ๐’๐’…๐’†๐’“๐’”๐’•๐’‚๐’๐’…๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ ๐‘พ๐’‰๐’š ๐‘ป๐’“๐’–๐’Ž๐’‘ ๐‘พ๐’๐’ The liberal establishment has colossally failed us and ushered in a dangerous Trump administration in the process. The only answer is a bottom-up working-class movement. โ˜… NEW ARTICLE โฌ‡๏ธ

โšซ๏ธโšช๏ธ The Comfort Stickโ„ข๏ธ's profile picture
โšซ๏ธโšช๏ธ The Comfort Stickโ„ข๏ธ1 year ago

He didnโ€™t answer anything and that should tell you everything

Michael Easton's profile picture
Michael Easton1 year ago

Then Justice Jackson wouldn't be on the Supreme Court because she couldn't answer what a woman is. Stop being stupid.

theycallme scottla's profile picture
theycallme scottla1 year ago

He's going to need a drink after the day he had today

Alfred Capone ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น's profile picture
Alfred Capone ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น1 year ago

Remeber when Justice Jackson refused to answer what a woman was? Do you still hold your opinion? Because I'd be happy to add another conservative to SCOTUS.

Trump 47's profile picture
Trump 471 year ago

Asking yes no questions to lead a candidate where you want it to go is not acceptable. A question should be ask and the candidate explains his response then follow up questions are ask. That is a normal discussion. Dems as usual are trying to control the narrative

๐Ÿ’™ Liberal ๐Ÿ’™ is a compliment!'s profile picture
๐Ÿ’™ Liberal ๐Ÿ’™ is a compliment!1 year ago

This is why Trump wants to enact the Insurrection Act โ€ฆ so he can use military. And slippery Hegseth referred to โ€œlawsโ€ that he would abide by. NOTHING Hegseth says can be relied upon. Everything is smoke and mirrors. Look over here so you canโ€™t see what we are doing over thereโ€ฆ If the administration were planning things that would be accepted by the American people, why all the deception? Itโ€™s like everything is sneakyโ€ฆ why? If itโ€™s lawful, they should come out with their intentions with pride and resolve. This is how criminals behave.

thorax11's profile picture
thorax111 year ago

You would think that he was back in a combat zone the way he deliberately dodges answering the question! My word!!

Related Videos