Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

This is the answer that really stood out from Beane on drafting a cornerback in the second round. I'm not saying you should or shouldn't agree with it, but of the things he said tonight, this was the answer I'll remember.

Matthew Bové

85,464 subscribers

157,853 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Justin Fields is asked about the possibility of the Jets drafting a quarterback this year: "I don't really like to answer rhetorical questions...I'm willing to teach, but I'm not really interested in rhetorical questions"

Justin Fields is asked about the possibility of the Jets drafting a quarterback this year: "I don't really like to answer rhetorical questions...I'm willing to teach, but I'm not really interested in rhetorical questions"

Jets Videos

234,623 просмотров • 1 год назад

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

Simon Ateba

997,322 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Damn this is the first one that has really bummed me out. I'm not arguing we needed him or should have paid him or anything like that. I'm saying he was one of my favorite players on the team and I loved watching him play. Is that allowed in 2026?

Damn this is the first one that has really bummed me out. I'm not arguing we needed him or should have paid him or anything like that. I'm saying he was one of my favorite players on the team and I loved watching him play. Is that allowed in 2026?

Underwood Leashed

64,295 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Reporter: Secretary Hegseth this morning called the alliance a paper tiger. He said that the alliance's reluctance to get involved in Iran was shameful and so on. You just said that you're happy he does this. But what was the mood in the room afterwards? NATO's Rutte: Well, I'm not sure you completely give credit to what Hegseth was saying. But I'm not sure about the ... Okay, I leave that with you. You will listen carefully to what he said. I'm not going to comment on every word every ally is saying. I never do that.

Reporter: Secretary Hegseth this morning called the alliance a paper tiger. He said that the alliance's reluctance to get involved in Iran was shameful and so on. You just said that you're happy he does this. But what was the mood in the room afterwards? NATO's Rutte: Well, I'm not sure you completely give credit to what Hegseth was saying. But I'm not sure about the ... Okay, I leave that with you. You will listen carefully to what he said. I'm not going to comment on every word every ally is saying. I never do that.

Clash Report

32,083 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Really passionate & candid answer from Sean McDermott to a question from Dom Tibbetts about changing the narrative of Buffalo. We had a nice long chat with McDermott a few weeks ago to talk about the season & this was the answer that really stood out to me 7 News WKBW

Really passionate & candid answer from Sean McDermott to a question from Dom Tibbetts about changing the narrative of Buffalo. We had a nice long chat with McDermott a few weeks ago to talk about the season & this was the answer that really stood out to me 7 News WKBW

Matthew Bové

58,358 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

It is now becoming abundantly clear that Dr. Mike Varshavski will not answer the simple question as to whether or not he watched the Lex Friedman podcast with RFK Jr. In law, there is the rule that a lawyer should never never ask a question to which they do not know the answer. The exception to that rule is when the answer is damning either way. The reason why Dr. Mike will not answer the question is because he is dammed either way. He either *did not* watch the podcast, in which case he repeats out-of-context propaganda because he didn’t take the time to do the required work. Or he *did* watch the podcast, and deliberately repeated out-of-context propaganda because he knows he can mislead his audience. Attached is what Dr. Mike put in his video, versus what RFK Jr. actually said on Lex podcast. Everyone understood what RFK was saying before Lex interrupted him (and what he said after): That there is always a risk-benefit analysis to be done on every vaccine. Mike is always welcome to come on my channel to discuss this viva voce. Pun intended.

It is now becoming abundantly clear that Dr. Mike Varshavski will not answer the simple question as to whether or not he watched the Lex Friedman podcast with RFK Jr. In law, there is the rule that a lawyer should never never ask a question to which they do not know the answer. The exception to that rule is when the answer is damning either way. The reason why Dr. Mike will not answer the question is because he is dammed either way. He either did not watch the podcast, in which case he repeats out-of-context propaganda because he didn’t take the time to do the required work. Or he did watch the podcast, and deliberately repeated out-of-context propaganda because he knows he can mislead his audience. Attached is what Dr. Mike put in his video, versus what RFK Jr. actually said on Lex podcast. Everyone understood what RFK was saying before Lex interrupted him (and what he said after): That there is always a risk-benefit analysis to be done on every vaccine. Mike is always welcome to come on my channel to discuss this viva voce. Pun intended.

Viva Frei

66,147 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

"When the Biden administration told the American people that the vacc*nated couldn't get the virus, was it MISINFORMATION or DISINFORMATION?" NO ANSWER. "When the Biden administration told the American people that the virus didn't come from a lab was that MISINFORMATION or DISINFORMATION?" NO ANSWER. "When the Biden administration said that *MASKS WORK* was that MISINFORMATION or DISINFORMATION?" NO ANSWER. These were the "EXPERTS" who silenced millions of Americans during the Cov*d pandemic. But it turns out the "EXPERTS" were the biggest peddlers of misinformation and disinformation . This was FRAUD on a massive scale and people MUST be held accountable.

"When the Biden administration told the American people that the vaccnated couldn't get the virus, was it MISINFORMATION or DISINFORMATION?" NO ANSWER. "When the Biden administration told the American people that the virus didn't come from a lab was that MISINFORMATION or DISINFORMATION?" NO ANSWER. "When the Biden administration said that MASKS WORK* was that MISINFORMATION or DISINFORMATION?" NO ANSWER. These were the "EXPERTS" who silenced millions of Americans during the Cov*d pandemic. But it turns out the "EXPERTS" were the biggest peddlers of misinformation and disinformation . This was FRAUD on a massive scale and people MUST be held accountable.

Kyle Becker

1,053,309 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Collins: You denied that the president said he was not taking Americans’ financial situations into consideration when he's making decisions on the Iran war. He was asked about that again. He stood by it, called it a perfect statement, and said he would make it again. Vance: What you did is you misrepresented the question that I was asked and you misrepresented the answer I gave. He allegedly said that he didn't care about Americans financial situations. He never said that. What he said was totally taken out of context.

Collins: You denied that the president said he was not taking Americans’ financial situations into consideration when he's making decisions on the Iran war. He was asked about that again. He stood by it, called it a perfect statement, and said he would make it again. Vance: What you did is you misrepresented the question that I was asked and you misrepresented the answer I gave. He allegedly said that he didn't care about Americans financial situations. He never said that. What he said was totally taken out of context.

Acyn

345,029 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

i actually do not even know how this guy ( NBDY ) is still liked by the community or not canceled by now. I do not even want to type out the things he has said in this video. It is an old one but saying things like this should not be forgotten

i actually do not even know how this guy ( NBDY ) is still liked by the community or not canceled by now. I do not even want to type out the things he has said in this video. It is an old one but saying things like this should not be forgotten

Ghuud

10,773 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A really great question from gary washburn on this general topic. It led to, what i’d say, was the most telling answer of the press conference. A long answer, but a filled one.

A really great question from gary washburn on this general topic. It led to, what i’d say, was the most telling answer of the press conference. A long answer, but a filled one.

Dale🏌️‍♂️

108,021 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

But this is not an answer! I asked the President who exactly he would fire out of all the people currently working on the water crisis! Surely the correct answer is the minister?

But this is not an answer! I asked the President who exactly he would fire out of all the people currently working on the water crisis! Surely the correct answer is the minister?

Mmusi Maimane MP

28,040 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Collins: Did you talk about how to answer the 2020 question? Emmer: Listen, he answered it. You don't like the answer, but he answered it. This is something that you folks in the media want to focus on..

Collins: Did you talk about how to answer the 2020 question? Emmer: Listen, he answered it. You don't like the answer, but he answered it. This is something that you folks in the media want to focus on..

Acyn

705,264 просмотров • 1 год назад

Remember when Alex Tuch said the goal was to win the Stanley Cup and not just make the playoffs? He was asked about that again tonight by Matthew Fairburn. He had a hell of an answer.

Remember when Alex Tuch said the goal was to win the Stanley Cup and not just make the playoffs? He was asked about that again tonight by Matthew Fairburn. He had a hell of an answer.

Matthew Bové

29,210 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"The 9th round was kind of a microcosm of Gervonta Davis' life in some ways. 43 seconds into the 9th round, he just decided, you know what, I'm going to take a timeout... He decided, I'm going to take a timeout because I said so, and he got away with that too. He gets away with a lot of things that you shouldn't get away with." Keith Idec on Tank Davis taking a knee in the 9th round.

"The 9th round was kind of a microcosm of Gervonta Davis' life in some ways. 43 seconds into the 9th round, he just decided, you know what, I'm going to take a timeout... He decided, I'm going to take a timeout because I said so, and he got away with that too. He gets away with a lot of things that you shouldn't get away with." Keith Idec on Tank Davis taking a knee in the 9th round.

Ariel Helwani

84,495 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Delhi: On Union HM Amit Shah's speech in the Parliament, Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "He did not answer our questions. It was a completely defensive response. I said that a transparent voter list should be given, but he did not answer this. I said EVM's architecture should be provided to all, but he did not say anything about it. I said that BJP leaders are voting in Haryana and Bihar, but he did not say anything about that. He did not say anything about the CJI. Election Commissioner is given full immunity... We are not scared..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Union HM Amit Shah's speech in the Parliament, Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "He did not answer our questions. It was a completely defensive response. I said that a transparent voter list should be given, but he did not answer this. I said EVM's architecture should be provided to all, but he did not say anything about it. I said that BJP leaders are voting in Haryana and Bihar, but he did not say anything about that. He did not say anything about the CJI. Election Commissioner is given full immunity... We are not scared..."

ANI

53,575 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Senator Marsha Blackburn has filed a subpoena for the flight logs of ALL passengers who have flown on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet. Should Americans know all passengers on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane? I'm not really sure about this one. I think that law enforcement certainly should have access to this information but I'm not sure if the general public should. Here's why: Epstein was a businessman. Not every person who met with Epstein, worked with Epstein or spent time with Epstein were committing sex crimes. In fact the vast majority of people who flew on his jet likely did not commit crimes. By releasing the list publicly, it is almost a certainty that those who are on the list will automatically get labeled a "pedo" or criminal. Innocent people will have their lives ruined over this. By no means am I saying the law enforcement shouldn't meticulously investigate anyone who did travel on the plane, but it shouldn't be something released publicly. Agree?

BREAKING: Senator Marsha Blackburn has filed a subpoena for the flight logs of ALL passengers who have flown on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet. Should Americans know all passengers on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane? I'm not really sure about this one. I think that law enforcement certainly should have access to this information but I'm not sure if the general public should. Here's why: Epstein was a businessman. Not every person who met with Epstein, worked with Epstein or spent time with Epstein were committing sex crimes. In fact the vast majority of people who flew on his jet likely did not commit crimes. By releasing the list publicly, it is almost a certainty that those who are on the list will automatically get labeled a "pedo" or criminal. Innocent people will have their lives ruined over this. By no means am I saying the law enforcement shouldn't meticulously investigate anyone who did travel on the plane, but it shouldn't be something released publicly. Agree?

Brian Krassenstein

4,231,629 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Of all the things that shouldn't happen, this is the one that really shouldn't.

Of all the things that shouldn't happen, this is the one that really shouldn't.

Turbine Traveller

306,264 просмотров • 1 год назад

Trey Amos is that dude. LOVE this answer from the Commanders rookie cornerback. Amos said, "I love guarding any receiver at any day...just having that mindset where nobody catches the ball on you."

Trey Amos is that dude. LOVE this answer from the Commanders rookie cornerback. Amos said, "I love guarding any receiver at any day...just having that mindset where nobody catches the ball on you."

Scott Abraham

46,593 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

I miss the days when people understood that words online had consequences. When you wrote or said something reckless on a blog, you owned it in real life too. Not saying violence is the answer but watching this clip of Lady Squander confronting Skimbo over what he said on his vlog is a reminder of a lost era: when people were a lot less brave behind a screen.

I miss the days when people understood that words online had consequences. When you wrote or said something reckless on a blog, you owned it in real life too. Not saying violence is the answer but watching this clip of Lady Squander confronting Skimbo over what he said on his vlog is a reminder of a lost era: when people were a lot less brave behind a screen.

Alexander Gusha

11,152 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jeremy White lays out why he can see Brandon Beane's reasoning for selecting a cornerback in the second-round of the NFL Draft, despite it not being a position that was discussed a lot prior to the draft!

Jeremy White lays out why he can see Brandon Beane's reasoning for selecting a cornerback in the second-round of the NFL Draft, despite it not being a position that was discussed a lot prior to the draft!

WGR 550

14,547 просмотров • 1 месяц назад