THIS Is The BIGGEST Difference Between Christians & Catholics

The doctrine of Sola Scriptura is literally contradictory to itself. 😭

That’s what people who hate God say

Is this argument sola scriptura or your own opinion?

All of your hundreds of sects claim the same thing and none of you agree. Catholics are the true Christians, and you are heretics.

The fruits of Protestantism.

You’re a heretic. A very prideful one at that. You can hate the Catholic Church all you want, but you can’t change the fact that it’s true. Anyone that puts their pride aside, deeply studies scripture, looks into 2,000 years of church history and yearns to be close to our Lord will always become Catholic. It’s a fact, not an opinion.

Ain’t reading all that I’m happy for u Or that sucks

It’s not reading. But okay

“Everything I believe can be backed up by the Bible”

Backed up by the Bible that was compiled by the Catholic Church? The Church that is the pillar and ground of the truth? Please check your Bible that the Catholic Church gave you and look at 1 Timothy 3:15 If you don't trust the Catholic Church, why would you follow the Bible that the Catholic Church compiled for you?

Where has the Catholic Church ever taught that Purgatory is for the sins Jesus didn’t pay for or that there are even sins Jesus didn’t pay for? Just making things up lol

I’m glad you can win debates against yourself. Common theme with Protestants who resort to hypothetical dialogues because they can’t engage in an actual conversation

Also, look at the "Protestant" idiot, he has tattoos on his body. That is an offense to God and a mortal sin. Leviticus 19:28 You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh, for the dead, neither shall you make in yourselves any figures or marks: I am the Lord. If "Protestants" "claim" that their bodies are the temple of the Holy Ghost, then why would they put graffiti on the facade of their bodies????? 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 Know you not, that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?   But if any man violate the temple of God, him shall God destroy. For the temple of God is holy, which you are. Not only does man offend God by his evil actions in his body but also by what man does to his body e.g. tattoos and body piercings and other mutilations of the flesh of a man's body!

So, by the "Protestant" standard, REGARDING, the Incarnation of Jesus, His human nature; His human body [flesh] made by the Holy Ghost, is corrupt bc Mary was a sinner. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 How stupid is that!!!??? Mary was saved in a greater way, she was save from falling into the pit all together! She did not contract Original Sin! Luke 1:48-49 Because he hath regarded the humility of his handmaid; for behold from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed.   (BECAUSE HE THAT IS MIGHTY, HATH DONE [GREAT THINGS] TO ME); and holy is his name. Canticles 6:8-9 One is my dove, {my perfect one is but one}, she is the only one of her mother, the chosen of her that bore her. The daughters saw her, and declared her most blessed: the queens and concubines, and they praised her.   Who is she that cometh forth as the morning rising, fair as the moon, bright as the sun, terrible as an army set in array? Apocalypse 12:1 And a great sign appeared in heaven: A woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars:

Ave Maria! My timeline was flooded They are all abandoning Protestantism

It’s not about Latin vs English. The Greek in Luke 1:28 is kecharitōmenē, a completed, ongoing state of grace. “Full of grace” captures that better than “favored one.” Even Google Translate renders it “full of grace.”

Context please!

Yep the context is plainly sided whenever the citation is given.

Especially when arguing amongst your schizo self

This is incorrect the translation of kecharitomene can’t be fully translated into english. And the added context is that the angel Gabriel uses it as a title or name. Hail! Kecharitomene which explains why she was confused. Man imagine the pride of thinking you know more than the church established by Christ himself. This is a false prophet. No more no less.

Papacy doesn’t mean that popes can’t fall into sin 🤦‍♂️

As a former Baptist and son of a SBC preacher, I converted to Catholicism after studying Scripture more deeply. Many other converts say the same thing.

This video heavily takes things out of context. It’s used to divide and deceive, a strategy of the devil he is using. The Aramaic to Greek word was kecharitomene, mean was, is and always will be full of grace. Translation literacy matters.

“In context” Your “context” brought fake reformed antitheology and cancerous naturalistic liberal antifaith into the world that denies nearly everything good, holy and true. No Christian cares about the “context” of atomized manmade interpretations of metaphysical truth by unbelievers. We care about what the transcendant Church of the ages authoritatively teaches. The Imminentism of Sola Scriptura is criminal. Go ahead and tell me how the Holy Trinity - the omnipotent intelligent designer, designs true religion based on liberal relativism, anti authoritarianism and doctrinal anarchy

You didn’t read Romans 3:23 in context… you did the exact same thing you accuse Catholics of doing by cherry picking scripture for your beliefs. Come on you got to get better at this if your goal is to convert Catholics.

Literally Protestant, catholic and Orthodox are Christian. There are a lot of Protestants that don’t know Christ, a lot of Catholics that don’t know Christ and Orthodox that don’t know Christ. What matters is how one responds to the Gospel and Jesus Christ and the acceptance of the Trinity.

You realize you answered the question in the video? Mary had to be sinless because she was giving birth to GOD. Mary's mother wasn't giving birth to God, so your logic falls flat

Catholics are Christians. Same as Baptists are Christians. And Methodists. And Calvinists. And Lutherans. And Anglicans. And Eastern Orthadox.

You know calumny is a mortal sin? The Bible (compiled by the Catholic Church) fully supports and endorses every single claim made by the Catholic Church.

The "I'm going to take the texts of a religion and decide they're 'misinterpreting it' based my individual interpretation of those same texts" type people are funny to me.

where’s in the bible that you can post endless psedotheological faggotry on twitter?

It's hilarious you accuse Catholics of proof texting; yet choosing a preferred bible translation is the same type of proof texting. And highly favored isn't an argument against Mary being the Immaculate Conception. I'd actually argue its further validation.

Catholics = original Christians.

Would like to see you argue against a real person instead of a straw man

Preach it, Taco!

The problem with by the scripture alone, the church is 400 years older than the Bible, which means the church can exist without the Bible, but the Bible could not exist without the church by your logic. You could wipe the Christian faith out and one generation if you just burned all the Bible. I would also like to point out that by just crediting the early church fathers you were also discredit the church fathers that assembled the scriptures in the first place

I’m curious why if this is such a “gotcha” and this supposed to be an honest argument about Catholics, why isn’t this a clip from an actual conversation?

Church fathers vs Taco 🤦‍♂️

Praying you overcome this need to perform