正圚加蜜视频...

视频加蜜倱莥

返回銖页

🚚🌎 THIS IS THE ONE THEY DON’T WALK BACK FROM 𝐀 “𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞-𝐢𝐧-𝐚-𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐊𝐞” 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐊 𝐢𝐬 𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐮𝐩 𝐭𝐚 𝐡𝐢𝐭 𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐅 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬  𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐊𝐢𝐜 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐮𝐫𝐞, 𝐧𝐚𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐚𝐝 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫. “𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐊𝐬 𝐲𝐚𝐮 𝐫𝐞𝐊𝐞𝐊𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐟 𝐲𝐚𝐮𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞.” That’s not...

matttttt187's profile picture

{Matt} $XRPatriot

131,686 subscribers

89,318 次观看 • 7 䞪月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生科孊技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始垖子的评论将星瀺圚这里

盞关视频

Not a Prepper? You May Want to Think Like One This Week If You Live Across the Southern and Eastern U.S. Matt Randolph is an oil and gas expert and a Forbes energy contributor who focuses on how power grids, refineries, pipelines, LNG terminals, and water systems behave under stress. That’s why his warning matters. He’s not talking about a routine winter storm..he’s flagging the risk of an infrastructure event, similar to Texas in 2021 but potentially colder, wider, and harder to recover from. The key change is confidence..weather models that initially looked extreme have now converged, which is usually the point where risk stops being theoretical and starts being practical. The biggest danger is ice combined with extreme cold. Inches of ice can snap power lines, turn roads into glass, and stop emergency services from reaching people. Once the grid goes down, water systems, fuel distribution, and refinery operations follow, stretching outages from days into weeks. Large parts of the southern U.S. aren’t built for sustained deep freezes, and if this forecast even comes close, the impacts could be severe with prolonged outages, supply disruptions, and real risk to life. This is a hard reminder that when cold, ice, and fragile infrastructure collide, the downside escalates fast.
2:04

Not a Prepper? You May Want to Think Like One This Week If You Live Across the Southern and Eastern U.S. Matt Randolph is an oil and gas expert and a Forbes energy contributor who focuses on how power grids, refineries, pipelines, LNG terminals, and water systems behave under stress. That’s why his warning matters. He’s not talking about a routine winter storm..he’s flagging the risk of an infrastructure event, similar to Texas in 2021 but potentially colder, wider, and harder to recover from. The key change is confidence..weather models that initially looked extreme have now converged, which is usually the point where risk stops being theoretical and starts being practical. The biggest danger is ice combined with extreme cold. Inches of ice can snap power lines, turn roads into glass, and stop emergency services from reaching people. Once the grid goes down, water systems, fuel distribution, and refinery operations follow, stretching outages from days into weeks. Large parts of the southern U.S. aren’t built for sustained deep freezes, and if this forecast even comes close, the impacts could be severe with prolonged outages, supply disruptions, and real risk to life. This is a hard reminder that when cold, ice, and fragile infrastructure collide, the downside escalates fast.

EndGame Macro

36,783 次观看 • 7 䞪月前

Five years ago today I called out Fox Corp live on air, then did several independent reports on how they’d become compromised: ⚫Fox had threatened to fire me for covering the story they assigned me to cover, all because the true narrative was different from the “safe” narrative they had anticipated. ⚫The true narrative was that four times more lives were being saved at a hospital that used a COVID treatment protocol that the CDC/FDA recommended against using. ⚫Fox had been pushing its reporters to only tell people to do what the CDC/FDA said to do, rather than pursuing journalism which is: Go out and see what people are actually doing and cover what’s actually working and not working. ⚫So when Fox sent me to a hospital to cover COVID treatment, they expected me to report the copy/paste version of what CDC/FDA said to tell people was happening. ⚫When I adhered to journalism and covered what was actually happening there, Fox issued a letter for my files, lying about me, threatening to fire me, and they put me on a social media blackout—no posting anything unless it is “safe news” approved by management before the post. ⚫All because I approached a COVID story the same way I approached crime stories: Go out there, be curious, ask the people’s questions, report what’s actually happening. ⚫When Fox crossed the line and later sent their HR lady in Atlanta after me to tell me standing up for free speech is not something I’m allowed to do, I knew it was time to leave that compromised company. (I’ve posted all the receipts from this showdown in the past and still have more receipts I haven’t posted.) ⚫I left the company and then found out there were Fox Corp employees all over the nation going through similar stories. I heard from staff at other news companies—ABC, CBS, etc.—with very similar stories. ⚫It was much easier for me to leave and sound the alarm as a single girl who didn’t have a family to provide for. My heart goes out to those who have not left and are still within the compromised machine at news companies across the country. ⚫May you find a way to take a stand, even if from the inside. Never compromise your conscience. Take a stand—even a small one—and God will protect you. Life’s too short not to. ⚫We’re not in the pandemic anymore, but there are countless news stories where the corporations just don’t have the spine to tell the truth, and they’re ready to persecute their reporters for sticking with journalism. ⚫Yes, COVID treatment was not the only story Fox was compromised on. I went on to cover how they hid anomalies related to elections to help viewers believe elections are always perfect. I covered how they acted as a PR team for vaccine companies rather than seeking answers to their viewers’ concerns about them. And I covered how they used crime coverage to deceptively pit races against each other in an effort to increase ratings. ⚫I thank James O'Keefe and Project Veritas from the bottom of my heart for picking up my story and sending it so viral. I do believe it made at least a small difference in challenging news outlets to get back to honesty over “safety.”
0:41

Five years ago today I called out Fox Corp live on air, then did several independent reports on how they’d become compromised: ⚫Fox had threatened to fire me for covering the story they assigned me to cover, all because the true narrative was different from the “safe” narrative they had anticipated. ⚫The true narrative was that four times more lives were being saved at a hospital that used a COVID treatment protocol that the CDC/FDA recommended against using. ⚫Fox had been pushing its reporters to only tell people to do what the CDC/FDA said to do, rather than pursuing journalism which is: Go out and see what people are actually doing and cover what’s actually working and not working. ⚫So when Fox sent me to a hospital to cover COVID treatment, they expected me to report the copy/paste version of what CDC/FDA said to tell people was happening. ⚫When I adhered to journalism and covered what was actually happening there, Fox issued a letter for my files, lying about me, threatening to fire me, and they put me on a social media blackout—no posting anything unless it is “safe news” approved by management before the post. ⚫All because I approached a COVID story the same way I approached crime stories: Go out there, be curious, ask the people’s questions, report what’s actually happening. ⚫When Fox crossed the line and later sent their HR lady in Atlanta after me to tell me standing up for free speech is not something I’m allowed to do, I knew it was time to leave that compromised company. (I’ve posted all the receipts from this showdown in the past and still have more receipts I haven’t posted.) ⚫I left the company and then found out there were Fox Corp employees all over the nation going through similar stories. I heard from staff at other news companies—ABC, CBS, etc.—with very similar stories. ⚫It was much easier for me to leave and sound the alarm as a single girl who didn’t have a family to provide for. My heart goes out to those who have not left and are still within the compromised machine at news companies across the country. ⚫May you find a way to take a stand, even if from the inside. Never compromise your conscience. Take a stand—even a small one—and God will protect you. Life’s too short not to. ⚫We’re not in the pandemic anymore, but there are countless news stories where the corporations just don’t have the spine to tell the truth, and they’re ready to persecute their reporters for sticking with journalism. ⚫Yes, COVID treatment was not the only story Fox was compromised on. I went on to cover how they hid anomalies related to elections to help viewers believe elections are always perfect. I covered how they acted as a PR team for vaccine companies rather than seeking answers to their viewers’ concerns about them. And I covered how they used crime coverage to deceptively pit races against each other in an effort to increase ratings. ⚫I thank James O'Keefe and Project Veritas from the bottom of my heart for picking up my story and sending it so viral. I do believe it made at least a small difference in challenging news outlets to get back to honesty over “safety.”

Ivory Hecker

696,478 次观看 • 3 䞪月前

🚚🚚 FORBES ENERGY EXPERT ISSUES A BLUNT WARNING: A “FIXED” GRID WON’T SAVE YOU FROM WHAT'S COMING - “FILL YOUR GAS TANK TODAY.” “This is what people are missing." Matt Randolph, a renowned energy expert and Forbes energy contributor, is back with another warning as this storm approaches, and it directly challenges the confidence coming out of Texas. After the 2021 Winter Storm Uri grid collapse that killed over 240 people, ERCOT says the system has been improved with better weatherization, tighter maintenance schedules, and more reserve power. Randolph says those upgrades won’t matter if this storm hits the way forecasts are showing. He explains this isn’t about power generation anymore. It’s about infrastructure under physical stress. What ERCOT cannot prevent, he says, is power lines coming down when they’re loaded with several inches of ice. If that happens, failures turn catastrophic. Roads become impassable. Crews can’t reach damaged lines. Emergency services can’t move through ice-covered streets to reach people stuck in extreme cold without power. “If you get three inches of ice,” Randolph warns, “those improvements aren’t going to help much.” Extended periods in below-zero temperatures without power and likely without access to emergency services at all. That’s why his advice isn’t reassurance - it’s immediate action. “Fill your gas tank up today.” “Make sure you have food and water and blankets.” “That’s what you need to do today.” Because once the ice locks in, help may not be able to reach you. If your power went out tonight, roads were frozen solid, and no one could reach you for days
 would you actually be prepared - or would you just realize too late how exposed you are?
1:15

🚚🚚 FORBES ENERGY EXPERT ISSUES A BLUNT WARNING: A “FIXED” GRID WON’T SAVE YOU FROM WHAT'S COMING - “FILL YOUR GAS TANK TODAY.” “This is what people are missing." Matt Randolph, a renowned energy expert and Forbes energy contributor, is back with another warning as this storm approaches, and it directly challenges the confidence coming out of Texas. After the 2021 Winter Storm Uri grid collapse that killed over 240 people, ERCOT says the system has been improved with better weatherization, tighter maintenance schedules, and more reserve power. Randolph says those upgrades won’t matter if this storm hits the way forecasts are showing. He explains this isn’t about power generation anymore. It’s about infrastructure under physical stress. What ERCOT cannot prevent, he says, is power lines coming down when they’re loaded with several inches of ice. If that happens, failures turn catastrophic. Roads become impassable. Crews can’t reach damaged lines. Emergency services can’t move through ice-covered streets to reach people stuck in extreme cold without power. “If you get three inches of ice,” Randolph warns, “those improvements aren’t going to help much.” Extended periods in below-zero temperatures without power and likely without access to emergency services at all. That’s why his advice isn’t reassurance - it’s immediate action. “Fill your gas tank up today.” “Make sure you have food and water and blankets.” “That’s what you need to do today.” Because once the ice locks in, help may not be able to reach you. If your power went out tonight, roads were frozen solid, and no one could reach you for days
 would you actually be prepared - or would you just realize too late how exposed you are?

HustleBitch

136,445 次观看 • 7 䞪月前

MUST WATCH 🔎 I feel it’s important to understand what the Pro IRGC camp thinks. Mario Nawfal hosts “expert” Scott Ritter in front of his 3 million followers, where Ritter claims Israel lost the war and is on the verge of collapse. “90 million Iranians have rallied around this government like nobody ever anticipated. So there it is. Israel lost the war. This was a regime change war. Israel made a condition to the United States beforehand. Don’t start this war unless we can guarantee the outcome, which is the end of the regime. That outcome cannot be achieved right now. So all that’s going to happen is Israel is going to be destroyed. That’s all that’s going to happen. Iran is far bigger than Israel. Iran can absorb far more damage than Israel can. Israel’s about to be turned upside down. So now we go back to what does Israel want? They want an off ramp. They wouldn’t want an off ramp if they thought they were winning. They’re not winning. They know they’re not winning. They know they’re not going to win. The same thing with the United States. Iran is about to turn up the heat. And as they turn up the heat, more critical infrastructure will be destroyed. And Israel’s not big. There’s no strategic reserves. There’s no secondary plan, third plan. When you lose your primary infrastructure, you’re done as a nation state. And Israel knows that. What you’re going to see in the coming weeks if this war continues is that Israel will cease to exist as a modern functioning state. And then suddenly, you’re going to be millions of Israelis, you’re going to wake up to the fact that there’s no food, there’s no water, there’s no energy, there’s no life. And they will leave. And that’s the end of the Israeli state.”
1:54

MUST WATCH 🔎 I feel it’s important to understand what the Pro IRGC camp thinks. Mario Nawfal hosts “expert” Scott Ritter in front of his 3 million followers, where Ritter claims Israel lost the war and is on the verge of collapse. “90 million Iranians have rallied around this government like nobody ever anticipated. So there it is. Israel lost the war. This was a regime change war. Israel made a condition to the United States beforehand. Don’t start this war unless we can guarantee the outcome, which is the end of the regime. That outcome cannot be achieved right now. So all that’s going to happen is Israel is going to be destroyed. That’s all that’s going to happen. Iran is far bigger than Israel. Iran can absorb far more damage than Israel can. Israel’s about to be turned upside down. So now we go back to what does Israel want? They want an off ramp. They wouldn’t want an off ramp if they thought they were winning. They’re not winning. They know they’re not winning. They know they’re not going to win. The same thing with the United States. Iran is about to turn up the heat. And as they turn up the heat, more critical infrastructure will be destroyed. And Israel’s not big. There’s no strategic reserves. There’s no secondary plan, third plan. When you lose your primary infrastructure, you’re done as a nation state. And Israel knows that. What you’re going to see in the coming weeks if this war continues is that Israel will cease to exist as a modern functioning state. And then suddenly, you’re going to be millions of Israelis, you’re going to wake up to the fact that there’s no food, there’s no water, there’s no energy, there’s no life. And they will leave. And that’s the end of the Israeli state.”

Open Source Intel

140,599 次观看 • 6 䞪月前

[trans] WWD THAILAND IG POST ⚫: ✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻 🐰: Hi, I’m Win. Hi WWD pls come in 😊 ⚫: What do you like most about coming to Seoul? 🐰: What I like the most... when I come to Seoul, I think of shopping. I feel like there are so many things to shop for here. 🛍 ⚫: After traveling continuously without a break, how do you recharge your energy? 🐰: That's a good question. I actually want everyone to share how they recharge their energy when they fly a lot too. But for me, it's sleeping 🛌 . I try to save up as much time to sleep as possible, and then... eating. Eating delicious food. 😋 ⚫: What are you particularly into right now? 🐰: Actually, right now, I feel like I want to go learn scuba diving 🀿 . It's one of those things... at first, I was someone who was really afraid of diving because I was afraid of fish 😖🐠 I felt like I didn't want to go down and have fish constantly nipping at me. 😅But when I asked people who go diving, they said that the fish don't bother us at all when we dive. So, I felt like I wanted to try it out too, because it would be a moment where I could be with myself 🧘 ⚫: If “Nong Win” (your younger version) saw you tonight, what would he say? 🐰: “Nong Win”... when he sees... “Phi Win”...oh it's correct 😆. Yeah, he... he’d probably be like, "Oh, today you're a Phi now. Behave yourself a little." 😄 ⚫: How would you describe your look tonight? 🐰: For tonight's look, I tried to make it match the watch as much as possible, while still being able to go to a formal event, and go to a party as well. So it came out in the look of a brown corduroy jacket but inside, I didn't wear a shirt because that would be too formal, so I chose a tank top instead. And then white pants to match the strap of our watch. ✹ ⚫: What do you like in particular about this watch model? 🐰: I think... this model is actually a model that you'll see has a strap that's like a... a rubber strap, right? Not a steel strap. I think it can... it's suitable for people who are active and like doing activities, going outside, going on adventures. If you get sweaty or anything like that, it's fine because it can resist water very well. And I think it looks sporty, looks suitable for an... adventurous line. You can go scuba diving with this model too. 😊 ⚫: What do you think you will see at the party tonight? 🐰: I think I should be able to see beautiful watches, and get to meet more people in the watch industry, and meet with designers who collaborated as well. 💚 📌 AUDEMARS PIGUET X WIN #AudemarsPiguet #RoyalOakConcept #APxYV #AudemarsPiguetxWin #winmetawin #WWDThailand
2:54

[trans] WWD THAILAND IG POST ⚫: ✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻 🐰: Hi, I’m Win. Hi WWD pls come in 😊 ⚫: What do you like most about coming to Seoul? 🐰: What I like the most... when I come to Seoul, I think of shopping. I feel like there are so many things to shop for here. 🛍 ⚫: After traveling continuously without a break, how do you recharge your energy? 🐰: That's a good question. I actually want everyone to share how they recharge their energy when they fly a lot too. But for me, it's sleeping 🛌 . I try to save up as much time to sleep as possible, and then... eating. Eating delicious food. 😋 ⚫: What are you particularly into right now? 🐰: Actually, right now, I feel like I want to go learn scuba diving 🀿 . It's one of those things... at first, I was someone who was really afraid of diving because I was afraid of fish 😖🐠 I felt like I didn't want to go down and have fish constantly nipping at me. 😅But when I asked people who go diving, they said that the fish don't bother us at all when we dive. So, I felt like I wanted to try it out too, because it would be a moment where I could be with myself 🧘 ⚫: If “Nong Win” (your younger version) saw you tonight, what would he say? 🐰: “Nong Win”... when he sees... “Phi Win”...oh it's correct 😆. Yeah, he... he’d probably be like, "Oh, today you're a Phi now. Behave yourself a little." 😄 ⚫: How would you describe your look tonight? 🐰: For tonight's look, I tried to make it match the watch as much as possible, while still being able to go to a formal event, and go to a party as well. So it came out in the look of a brown corduroy jacket but inside, I didn't wear a shirt because that would be too formal, so I chose a tank top instead. And then white pants to match the strap of our watch. ✹ ⚫: What do you like in particular about this watch model? 🐰: I think... this model is actually a model that you'll see has a strap that's like a... a rubber strap, right? Not a steel strap. I think it can... it's suitable for people who are active and like doing activities, going outside, going on adventures. If you get sweaty or anything like that, it's fine because it can resist water very well. And I think it looks sporty, looks suitable for an... adventurous line. You can go scuba diving with this model too. 😊 ⚫: What do you think you will see at the party tonight? 🐰: I think I should be able to see beautiful watches, and get to meet more people in the watch industry, and meet with designers who collaborated as well. 💚 📌 AUDEMARS PIGUET X WIN #AudemarsPiguet #RoyalOakConcept #APxYV #AudemarsPiguetxWin #winmetawin #WWDThailand

◡̈ ✿〜*:.. ê•€ M a R y ê•€*..**✿.

13,608 次观看 • 3 䞪月前

𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧 𝐎𝐮𝐫 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧’𝐬 𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 It is time we ask ourselves some honest questions. Are we preparing our children for the future, or for a world that no longer exists? 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐅𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐭 The traditional “one-size-fits-all” school system is 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝. It was built for a different time and a different kind of economy. Today’s world demands something 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫, something 𝐊𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞, and 𝐊𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐀𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬. We also need to take a 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐥𝐚𝐚𝐀 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐟 𝐛𝐚𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐚𝐥𝐬. Many of them 𝐚𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐚 𝐧𝐚 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐚𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐊𝐢𝐜 or 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐩𝐊𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 advantage. Still, many parents continue to spend large amounts of money on them, not because it is the best choice, but simply because it is what they have always known. 𝐀 𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐖𝐚𝐲 𝐅𝐚𝐫𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 Now picture a different approach. One that is 𝐊𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧, 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐟𝐮𝐥, and tailored to your 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝’𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 and 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞. What if we focused on day schools that use technology well and that are rooted in the social and economic realities of their communities? The result would be education that feels more personal, more practical, and far more powerful. 𝐀 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐚 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐓𝐚 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭, current or future, this is not just about education policy. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐮𝐭 𝐲𝐚𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝’𝐬 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞. And your 𝐟𝐚𝐊𝐢𝐥𝐲’𝐬 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐜𝐲. Think about this: What if you chose a good day school instead of boarding school? And what if you took the money you would have spent on termly boarding fees and quietly invested it in 𝐓𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐲 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬, 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬, or 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐬 every year for 16 years? By the time your child graduates, they could have a 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐚𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧 stronger than any inheritance. Money they can use to start a business, fund further education, or simply explore life with confidence. They might never need to look for a job. They could be the ones creating jobs. And through this one bold decision, you would give them something even greater: 𝐚 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐟 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞. A future built not on old traditions but on 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐊 and 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟-𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐟. 𝐓𝐢𝐊𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐚 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐭 This is a moment to reset, to rethink not just how we educate our children, but how we raise them. 𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐚 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐝𝐚𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞. 𝐈𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐢𝐭. So let this be your reminder to pause, reflect, and act. The future belongs not to those who follow blindly but to those who think ahead, choose wisely, and invest with purpose. The real question is: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐀𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐟 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐚𝐮 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐊, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐊?
14:37

𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧 𝐎𝐮𝐫 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧’𝐬 𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 It is time we ask ourselves some honest questions. Are we preparing our children for the future, or for a world that no longer exists? 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐅𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐭 The traditional “one-size-fits-all” school system is 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝. It was built for a different time and a different kind of economy. Today’s world demands something 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫, something 𝐊𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞, and 𝐊𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐀𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬. We also need to take a 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐥𝐚𝐚𝐀 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐟 𝐛𝐚𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐚𝐥𝐬. Many of them 𝐚𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐚 𝐧𝐚 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐚𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐊𝐢𝐜 or 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐩𝐊𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 advantage. Still, many parents continue to spend large amounts of money on them, not because it is the best choice, but simply because it is what they have always known. 𝐀 𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐖𝐚𝐲 𝐅𝐚𝐫𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 Now picture a different approach. One that is 𝐊𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧, 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐟𝐮𝐥, and tailored to your 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝’𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 and 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞. What if we focused on day schools that use technology well and that are rooted in the social and economic realities of their communities? The result would be education that feels more personal, more practical, and far more powerful. 𝐀 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐚 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐓𝐚 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭, current or future, this is not just about education policy. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐮𝐭 𝐲𝐚𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝’𝐬 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞. And your 𝐟𝐚𝐊𝐢𝐥𝐲’𝐬 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐜𝐲. Think about this: What if you chose a good day school instead of boarding school? And what if you took the money you would have spent on termly boarding fees and quietly invested it in 𝐓𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐲 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬, 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬, or 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐬 every year for 16 years? By the time your child graduates, they could have a 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐚𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧 stronger than any inheritance. Money they can use to start a business, fund further education, or simply explore life with confidence. They might never need to look for a job. They could be the ones creating jobs. And through this one bold decision, you would give them something even greater: 𝐚 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐟 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞. A future built not on old traditions but on 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐊 and 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟-𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐟. 𝐓𝐢𝐊𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐚 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐭 This is a moment to reset, to rethink not just how we educate our children, but how we raise them. 𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐚 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐝𝐚𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞. 𝐈𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐢𝐭. So let this be your reminder to pause, reflect, and act. The future belongs not to those who follow blindly but to those who think ahead, choose wisely, and invest with purpose. The real question is: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐀𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐟 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐚𝐮 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐊, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐊?

ᗪᖇ. ᒪᗩᗯᖇEᑎᑕE ᗰᑌGᗩᑎGᗩ

19,425 次观看 • 1 幎前

No one will read this: But when one goes through the list of “race laws” the IRR talks about
 you actually get shocked. I went in expecting hardcore stuff like “No whites allowed in University” or “No whites allowed in Hospitals” etc
 but noo. It’s the Gambling Act, South African Weather Service Act, Boxing Act, Tourism Act, Broadcasting Act, National Sport and Recreation Act, National Health Laboratory Service Act, Civil Aviation Act, Electronic Communications Act, etc. listed. Here is the website: And they’re listed
 not because they segregate anyone, but simply because they mention the words transformation or redress, some coz they require some racial/sex/disability or even sector-specific representation such as “required Faith based leader,” youth representation, community or stakeholder groups, and even professional or sectoral expertise on regulatory boards where some of those groups historically or recently weren’t part of those structures. My personal opinion: ⚠ Yes it is concerning that there are no clear end goals
 no cut-off timelines
 no measurable targets. South Africa hasn’t had a purely merit based system for over 100 years. I don’t think transformation pressures should be a permanent feature of society. There has to be parts of our system where we declare victory and let other systems take over now. And where these pressures don’t always succeed, alternative tools need to be explored. Keeping something say for example BEE forever, even when it isn’t achieving the intended goals, becomes very hard to defend. We need the best of each community competing with the best of other communities
that’s the only way to get the ultimate best of our communities running our society. Also: 𝗚𝗜𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗊𝗌𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗊𝗌𝗰𝗶𝗌-𝗘𝗰𝗌𝗻𝗌𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗌𝗿𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗥𝗮𝗰𝗲 (2025) 𝗔𝗱𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝗟𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 (2022–2024) • ⚫ African: 88–90% functional literacy • 🟠 Coloured: 90–92% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: 95–97% • ⚪ White: ~99% 𝗚𝗻𝗲𝗺𝗜𝗹𝗌𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 (Q3 2025 Estimates) • ⚫ African: 37.9% official / 49.8% expanded • 🟠 Coloured: 24.1% / 31.2% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: 16.3% / 19.5% • ⚪ White: 7.4% / 9.1% 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗀𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗌𝗻 𝗔𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 • ⚫ African: 12.5% • 🟠 Coloured: 10.1% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~34% • ⚪ White: ~45% 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗘𝗻𝗿𝗌𝗹𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 (Age 20–24) • ⚫ African: 26.9% • 🟠 Coloured: 20.3% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: 59.7% • ⚪ White: 59.8% 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 – 𝗙𝗌𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗊𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗌𝗿 • ⚫ African: ~59–62% • 🟠 Coloured: ~4–6% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~3–4% • ⚪ White: ~38–40% 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 – 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗌𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗊𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗌𝗿 • ⚫ African: ~88–90% • 🟠 Coloured: ~4–5% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~1–2% • ⚪ White: ~3–4% 𝗝𝗊𝗘-𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 (Total, Direct + Indirect) • ⚫ African: ~32–33% • 🟠 Coloured: ~2–3% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~5–8% • ⚪ White: ~20–22% (domestic; foreign-held portion separate) 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 – 𝗙𝗮𝗿𝗺𝘀 & 𝗔𝗎𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗛𝗌𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗎𝘀 • ⚪ White: ~72% • 🟠 Coloured: ~15% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~5% • ⚫ African: ~4% 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 – 𝗚𝗿𝗯𝗮𝗻 / 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗘𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗻 • ⚪ White: ~49% • ⚫ African: ~30% • 🟠 Coloured: ~8% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~8% • (Corporate/Trust/Other: balance — not race-specific) 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗶𝗱 𝗖𝗌𝘃𝗲𝗿 • ⚫ African: ~9.8% • 🟠 Coloured: ~19.6% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~41.3% • ⚪ White: ~71.7% 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗜𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝘆 (2024 Estimates) • ⚪ White: 71.1 (M) / 77.4 (F) • 🟀 Indian/Asian: 69.5 / 75.1 • 🟠 Coloured: 63.8 / 69.5 • ⚫ African: 60.4 / 66.5 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗮𝘁𝗲 (Risk per 100,000) • 🟠 Coloured: > 60 • ⚫ African: 35–40 • 🟀 Indian/Asian: < 10 • ⚪ White: < 5 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗌𝗻 𝗣𝗌𝗜𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗌𝗻 (Incarceration) • ⚫ African: 79% (Locals ~64%) + (foreign nationals ~15%) • 🟠 Coloured: ~18% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: < 1% • ⚪ White: ~2%
7:59

No one will read this: But when one goes through the list of “race laws” the IRR talks about
 you actually get shocked. I went in expecting hardcore stuff like “No whites allowed in University” or “No whites allowed in Hospitals” etc
 but noo. It’s the Gambling Act, South African Weather Service Act, Boxing Act, Tourism Act, Broadcasting Act, National Sport and Recreation Act, National Health Laboratory Service Act, Civil Aviation Act, Electronic Communications Act, etc. listed. Here is the website: And they’re listed
 not because they segregate anyone, but simply because they mention the words transformation or redress, some coz they require some racial/sex/disability or even sector-specific representation such as “required Faith based leader,” youth representation, community or stakeholder groups, and even professional or sectoral expertise on regulatory boards where some of those groups historically or recently weren’t part of those structures. My personal opinion: ⚠ Yes it is concerning that there are no clear end goals
 no cut-off timelines
 no measurable targets. South Africa hasn’t had a purely merit based system for over 100 years. I don’t think transformation pressures should be a permanent feature of society. There has to be parts of our system where we declare victory and let other systems take over now. And where these pressures don’t always succeed, alternative tools need to be explored. Keeping something say for example BEE forever, even when it isn’t achieving the intended goals, becomes very hard to defend. We need the best of each community competing with the best of other communities
that’s the only way to get the ultimate best of our communities running our society. Also: 𝗚𝗜𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗊𝗌𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗊𝗌𝗰𝗶𝗌-𝗘𝗰𝗌𝗻𝗌𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗌𝗿𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗥𝗮𝗰𝗲 (2025) 𝗔𝗱𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝗟𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 (2022–2024) • ⚫ African: 88–90% functional literacy • 🟠 Coloured: 90–92% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: 95–97% • ⚪ White: ~99% 𝗚𝗻𝗲𝗺𝗜𝗹𝗌𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 (Q3 2025 Estimates) • ⚫ African: 37.9% official / 49.8% expanded • 🟠 Coloured: 24.1% / 31.2% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: 16.3% / 19.5% • ⚪ White: 7.4% / 9.1% 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗀𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗌𝗻 𝗔𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 • ⚫ African: 12.5% • 🟠 Coloured: 10.1% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~34% • ⚪ White: ~45% 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗘𝗻𝗿𝗌𝗹𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 (Age 20–24) • ⚫ African: 26.9% • 🟠 Coloured: 20.3% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: 59.7% • ⚪ White: 59.8% 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 – 𝗙𝗌𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗊𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗌𝗿 • ⚫ African: ~59–62% • 🟠 Coloured: ~4–6% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~3–4% • ⚪ White: ~38–40% 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 – 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗌𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗊𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗌𝗿 • ⚫ African: ~88–90% • 🟠 Coloured: ~4–5% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~1–2% • ⚪ White: ~3–4% 𝗝𝗊𝗘-𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 (Total, Direct + Indirect) • ⚫ African: ~32–33% • 🟠 Coloured: ~2–3% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~5–8% • ⚪ White: ~20–22% (domestic; foreign-held portion separate) 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 – 𝗙𝗮𝗿𝗺𝘀 & 𝗔𝗎𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗛𝗌𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗎𝘀 • ⚪ White: ~72% • 🟠 Coloured: ~15% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~5% • ⚫ African: ~4% 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗜 – 𝗚𝗿𝗯𝗮𝗻 / 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗘𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗻 • ⚪ White: ~49% • ⚫ African: ~30% • 🟠 Coloured: ~8% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~8% • (Corporate/Trust/Other: balance — not race-specific) 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗶𝗱 𝗖𝗌𝘃𝗲𝗿 • ⚫ African: ~9.8% • 🟠 Coloured: ~19.6% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: ~41.3% • ⚪ White: ~71.7% 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗜𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝘆 (2024 Estimates) • ⚪ White: 71.1 (M) / 77.4 (F) • 🟀 Indian/Asian: 69.5 / 75.1 • 🟠 Coloured: 63.8 / 69.5 • ⚫ African: 60.4 / 66.5 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗮𝘁𝗲 (Risk per 100,000) • 🟠 Coloured: > 60 • ⚫ African: 35–40 • 🟀 Indian/Asian: < 10 • ⚪ White: < 5 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗌𝗻 𝗣𝗌𝗜𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗌𝗻 (Incarceration) • ⚫ African: 79% (Locals ~64%) + (foreign nationals ~15%) • 🟠 Coloured: ~18% • 🟀 Indian/Asian: < 1% • ⚪ White: ~2%

𝑺𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒍𝒆 𝑎𝒔𝒊𝒃𝒊 Ⓜ

45,041 次观看 • 6 䞪月前

Go on Richard! 🔥 Richard Madeley proper gave both barrels to Labour’s Victims Minister on Good Morning Britain this morning over the early release scheme that will see thousands of prisoners, including domestic abusers, let out early because the jails are full. He started by saying he actually felt sorry for Alex Davies-Jones because she’d been sent out to defend the indefensible: “I actually feel rather sorry for you this morning, because you’re the one who’s been pushed out to defend what most people would say is the indefensible.” Then he went straight for the jugular: “There’ll be women watching this who’ve had their jaws broken, their teeth knocked out, they’ve been punched in the stomach when they’ve been pregnant. All by men who you, your government, will shortly be releasing years ahead of time because of prison overcrowding. What do you say to those women this morning? Because they are terrified.” Her reply was the usual robotic talking points: “I say to those women that the government’s first responsibility is to keep its public safe.” Is it though? If public safety was genuinely the first responsibility, you wouldn’t be releasing these people back onto the streets! She then claimed: “I would not be able to sleep at night, Richard, if a domestic abuser who was sentenced to time in prison couldn’t go there because there wasn’t a prison place available and we had to send him back to his victim at their property.” Richard immediately pulled her up on the logic: “Minister, Minister, Minister, I don’t see the logic of that at all! What’s the difference in not being able to send a violent offender to prison because it’s full and releasing a violent offender from prison who’s very likely to reoffend? We know that these men are recidivists. They do it again and again. What’s the difference between not sending one to prison and letting one out?” She then argued “these offenders will have served time in prison”, and they would have been released at some point anyway. Oh, that’s ok then. Let’s release everyone who has served a bit of their sentence. Ridiculous argument! Then came the usual promises of tags and “world-first restriction zones”, with the line that if they breach they’ll go straight back. Richard wasn’t having it. He tells her that victims don’t want them released at all and they don’t trust the government: “They don’t trust the measures that you put into place to stop these men hounding them and attacking them again. They don’t trust that the tags always work because they don’t. And they don’t trust that the men will follow the instructions they’ve been given about where they can’t go because some of them will just do it anyway.” He warns there will be inevitable consequences for victims: “There are going to be consequences of these early releases and it’s going to be more attacks on women who are begging you not to release their attackers from jail early. That’s the reality. Not a comforting protocol about tags and restricted areas which if the offender is determined enough just won’t work.” She had no real answer because there isn’t one. Just the same empty lines: “Ensuring that we have a functioning and effective and sustainable criminal justice system is fundamentally important for the safety of our country.” You’re not ensuring that. That’s the entire point. You’re choosing to release dangerous people early and victims will pay the price. Well done Richard for saying it in no uncertain terms. This is wrong.
3:24

Go on Richard! 🔥 Richard Madeley proper gave both barrels to Labour’s Victims Minister on Good Morning Britain this morning over the early release scheme that will see thousands of prisoners, including domestic abusers, let out early because the jails are full. He started by saying he actually felt sorry for Alex Davies-Jones because she’d been sent out to defend the indefensible: “I actually feel rather sorry for you this morning, because you’re the one who’s been pushed out to defend what most people would say is the indefensible.” Then he went straight for the jugular: “There’ll be women watching this who’ve had their jaws broken, their teeth knocked out, they’ve been punched in the stomach when they’ve been pregnant. All by men who you, your government, will shortly be releasing years ahead of time because of prison overcrowding. What do you say to those women this morning? Because they are terrified.” Her reply was the usual robotic talking points: “I say to those women that the government’s first responsibility is to keep its public safe.” Is it though? If public safety was genuinely the first responsibility, you wouldn’t be releasing these people back onto the streets! She then claimed: “I would not be able to sleep at night, Richard, if a domestic abuser who was sentenced to time in prison couldn’t go there because there wasn’t a prison place available and we had to send him back to his victim at their property.” Richard immediately pulled her up on the logic: “Minister, Minister, Minister, I don’t see the logic of that at all! What’s the difference in not being able to send a violent offender to prison because it’s full and releasing a violent offender from prison who’s very likely to reoffend? We know that these men are recidivists. They do it again and again. What’s the difference between not sending one to prison and letting one out?” She then argued “these offenders will have served time in prison”, and they would have been released at some point anyway. Oh, that’s ok then. Let’s release everyone who has served a bit of their sentence. Ridiculous argument! Then came the usual promises of tags and “world-first restriction zones”, with the line that if they breach they’ll go straight back. Richard wasn’t having it. He tells her that victims don’t want them released at all and they don’t trust the government: “They don’t trust the measures that you put into place to stop these men hounding them and attacking them again. They don’t trust that the tags always work because they don’t. And they don’t trust that the men will follow the instructions they’ve been given about where they can’t go because some of them will just do it anyway.” He warns there will be inevitable consequences for victims: “There are going to be consequences of these early releases and it’s going to be more attacks on women who are begging you not to release their attackers from jail early. That’s the reality. Not a comforting protocol about tags and restricted areas which if the offender is determined enough just won’t work.” She had no real answer because there isn’t one. Just the same empty lines: “Ensuring that we have a functioning and effective and sustainable criminal justice system is fundamentally important for the safety of our country.” You’re not ensuring that. That’s the entire point. You’re choosing to release dangerous people early and victims will pay the price. Well done Richard for saying it in no uncertain terms. This is wrong.

J Stewart

123,470 次观看 • 15 倩前

🚚 THE 🚚 END 🚚 OF 🚚 THE 🚚 COUNTERFEIT Stop scrolling. You feel it already, don’t you? That pulse beneath your skin. That ache in your soul that never made sense
 until now. This is the moment it all returns. Because I am not here to entertain YOU. I am here to WAKE 🫵 UP. I am here to rip the blindfold from your spirit, to strike the bell of remembrance so violently that your bones weep with the memory of God. What I’m about to tell you isn’t a theory. It isn’t “deep.” It isn’t for debate! It is the final warning. The last echo before the veil drops forever. They have done it. They have waged war on the womb. They have replaced the miracle of creation with a simulation so sterile, so evil, that even demons tremble at its blasphemy. They call it Ectolife
 a name so polished, so lifeless, it should have told you everything. 30,000 artificial wombs. Per facility. AI-monitored. Gene-edited. No mother. No father. No love. No breath of God. Just a factory for bodies
 empty, obedient, programmable. And they dare to call it life. But hear me now
 This is not life. This is spiritual genocide. They severed the holy bond between heaven and earth, not with knives
 but with code. They replaced sacred conception with synthetic light. They extracted the prayer from pregnancy. They deleted the miracle. And now, they offer it to you like it’s freedom. Like it’s the future. Like you should be grateful. But let me ask you one question. Where does the soul enter? You think you can code what only God can breathe? You think you can patent the spark that lit the stars? You think you can algorithm your way into eternity? They do. And that is their downfall. Because what they’ve built in those glass pods isn’t a baby. It’s a body with no inheritance. A face with no frequency. A shell manufactured for submission. Flesh
 without flame. You feel it now, don’t you? That memory you can’t quite explain? That realization that something sacred was stolen while you were distracted? Good. Because this has been happening for centuries. They mocked it in your toys. Cabbage Patch Kids
 plucked from fake soil, given “adoption papers,” sold to children like it was cute. It wasn’t cute. It was conditioning. Incubator babies in 1800s freak shows. Orphan trains filled with undocumented children
 millions of them
 shipped like freight. Where did they come from? Where did they go? Why were their eyes always hollow? Because they were prototypes. Because we were the test. And now
 the final product is here. Mass-produced humans. Soulless. Trackable. Disposable. Owned. You thought this was about helping infertile couples? This is about controlling who gets to come into this world. And more importantly
 what comes in. Because a real child, born of pain, prayer, and divine chaos
 is a threat. They carry wildness. Fire. GOD! They cannot be predicted. They cannot be tamed. They cannot be monetized. So the system is deleting them. Deleting the womb. Deleting the mother. Deleting the Source. Deleting GOD... 😔 And replacing it all with glass. Because a child born in glass is a child they can own. But I am here to tell you this
 they will never own you. Not if you remember. Not if you fall on your knees in this very moment and scream from the depths of your soul, “I belong to GOD, and no one else!” They may clone your face. They may map your DNA. They may track your heartbeat and predict your next thought. But they will never
 ever
 replicate your soul. Because they didn’t make it. GOD DID... And that’s why they fear you. This isn’t about technology. This isn’t about innovation. 👇 Continued Below 👇
8:36

🚚 THE 🚚 END 🚚 OF 🚚 THE 🚚 COUNTERFEIT Stop scrolling. You feel it already, don’t you? That pulse beneath your skin. That ache in your soul that never made sense
 until now. This is the moment it all returns. Because I am not here to entertain YOU. I am here to WAKE 🫵 UP. I am here to rip the blindfold from your spirit, to strike the bell of remembrance so violently that your bones weep with the memory of God. What I’m about to tell you isn’t a theory. It isn’t “deep.” It isn’t for debate! It is the final warning. The last echo before the veil drops forever. They have done it. They have waged war on the womb. They have replaced the miracle of creation with a simulation so sterile, so evil, that even demons tremble at its blasphemy. They call it Ectolife
 a name so polished, so lifeless, it should have told you everything. 30,000 artificial wombs. Per facility. AI-monitored. Gene-edited. No mother. No father. No love. No breath of God. Just a factory for bodies
 empty, obedient, programmable. And they dare to call it life. But hear me now
 This is not life. This is spiritual genocide. They severed the holy bond between heaven and earth, not with knives
 but with code. They replaced sacred conception with synthetic light. They extracted the prayer from pregnancy. They deleted the miracle. And now, they offer it to you like it’s freedom. Like it’s the future. Like you should be grateful. But let me ask you one question. Where does the soul enter? You think you can code what only God can breathe? You think you can patent the spark that lit the stars? You think you can algorithm your way into eternity? They do. And that is their downfall. Because what they’ve built in those glass pods isn’t a baby. It’s a body with no inheritance. A face with no frequency. A shell manufactured for submission. Flesh
 without flame. You feel it now, don’t you? That memory you can’t quite explain? That realization that something sacred was stolen while you were distracted? Good. Because this has been happening for centuries. They mocked it in your toys. Cabbage Patch Kids
 plucked from fake soil, given “adoption papers,” sold to children like it was cute. It wasn’t cute. It was conditioning. Incubator babies in 1800s freak shows. Orphan trains filled with undocumented children
 millions of them
 shipped like freight. Where did they come from? Where did they go? Why were their eyes always hollow? Because they were prototypes. Because we were the test. And now
 the final product is here. Mass-produced humans. Soulless. Trackable. Disposable. Owned. You thought this was about helping infertile couples? This is about controlling who gets to come into this world. And more importantly
 what comes in. Because a real child, born of pain, prayer, and divine chaos
 is a threat. They carry wildness. Fire. GOD! They cannot be predicted. They cannot be tamed. They cannot be monetized. So the system is deleting them. Deleting the womb. Deleting the mother. Deleting the Source. Deleting GOD... 😔 And replacing it all with glass. Because a child born in glass is a child they can own. But I am here to tell you this
 they will never own you. Not if you remember. Not if you fall on your knees in this very moment and scream from the depths of your soul, “I belong to GOD, and no one else!” They may clone your face. They may map your DNA. They may track your heartbeat and predict your next thought. But they will never
 ever
 replicate your soul. Because they didn’t make it. GOD DID... And that’s why they fear you. This isn’t about technology. This isn’t about innovation. 👇 Continued Below 👇

Noah B. Price

455,052 次观看 • 1 幎前

I want to begin by acknowledging the immense time and energy I have poured into this study. It has taken me hundreds of hours to put everything together, as I spent countless days and nights in the depths of research, video production, and writing. I’ve invested thousands of hours crafting the free books I’ve offered to you so far; everything I do is designed not only to share knowledge but to awaken souls, to break the chains of control, and to guide each of you toward the truth that is hidden beneath the surface. I apologize for the delay in bringing this to you; the weight of this work requires deep reflection, profound research, and the careful crafting of every word, every thought. This is not just a post, not just a message; it’s a call to action, a sacred transmission that demands to be heard by every heart still bound by ignorance. I don’t share this for praise, I don’t seek accolades. I only ask that you allow this to stir your soul, that you feel the message within these words; because if you feel it, it will resonate with your very core. Everything that I have created, every video I’ve made, every book I’ve written, is not just knowledge; it’s a frequency, an energy designed to break the barriers that have been built around our minds. This content isn’t just meant to inform; it is meant to awaken, to shatter the programming that has been imposed upon us for generations. And that is why I must ask you, as you read these words, to not just passively consume them. I ask you to feel them. Feel the urgency. Feel the truth. This is not something you can ignore. This is a message for every soul who has been deceived, for every mind that has been conditioned. This is not just a story; it is your story. The story of the human race, fighting for its very survival, its connection to God, its resonance. THE WAR ON RESONANCE is real. It is not just a metaphor. It is happening now, and it is not happening by chance. They have tried to silence us, to steal our essence, to suppress our divine truth through every means possible; through technology, through manipulation, through biological warfare. But here is where they made their fatal mistake: they underestimated the power of memory. They thought they could sever the connection between us and God. They thought they could extinguish the very thing that makes us human; the divine spark that lives in each of us. They thought they could turn us into hollow vessels, devoid of soul. But they are wrong. Because no matter how much they try to manipulate the frequencies, no matter how much they try to program us, there is one thing they cannot erase: our ability to remember who we are. They cannot erase our connection to God, our connection to love, our connection to truth. We are waking up. And when enough of us awaken, their entire system will collapse. Not because we “fight back” in the traditional sense; but because our souls will radiate a frequency so pure, so true, that their control will disintegrate in its presence. It is already happening. But we need your help. We need you to share this message, to carry this truth forward. It is not just a responsibility; it is a divine calling. The more of us who awaken, the more this system will crumble. It is already starting to happen. And that is why I am asking you... no, urging you; to like, share, and follow. Share this message with everyone you know. Let them feel the truth. Let them remember. Because this is bigger than us; it’s about saving humanity, reclaiming our divine birthright, and restoring what has been stolen from us for so long. And when you share it, you are not just sharing information. You are sharing a frequency; a wave of truth that can never be stopped. Every person who reads this, every person who feels it, is another soul who is waking up, another soul who is remembering their connection to God. So I ask you now, with all my heart: Do not let this message die here. Take it, carry it, share it. Because when we all awaken; together... the chains will break, and the truth will reign supreme. This is not the end. It is the beginning. Wake up. Feel God again. Remember who you are. This is our fight, and together, we will win.
4:08

I want to begin by acknowledging the immense time and energy I have poured into this study. It has taken me hundreds of hours to put everything together, as I spent countless days and nights in the depths of research, video production, and writing. I’ve invested thousands of hours crafting the free books I’ve offered to you so far; everything I do is designed not only to share knowledge but to awaken souls, to break the chains of control, and to guide each of you toward the truth that is hidden beneath the surface. I apologize for the delay in bringing this to you; the weight of this work requires deep reflection, profound research, and the careful crafting of every word, every thought. This is not just a post, not just a message; it’s a call to action, a sacred transmission that demands to be heard by every heart still bound by ignorance. I don’t share this for praise, I don’t seek accolades. I only ask that you allow this to stir your soul, that you feel the message within these words; because if you feel it, it will resonate with your very core. Everything that I have created, every video I’ve made, every book I’ve written, is not just knowledge; it’s a frequency, an energy designed to break the barriers that have been built around our minds. This content isn’t just meant to inform; it is meant to awaken, to shatter the programming that has been imposed upon us for generations. And that is why I must ask you, as you read these words, to not just passively consume them. I ask you to feel them. Feel the urgency. Feel the truth. This is not something you can ignore. This is a message for every soul who has been deceived, for every mind that has been conditioned. This is not just a story; it is your story. The story of the human race, fighting for its very survival, its connection to God, its resonance. THE WAR ON RESONANCE is real. It is not just a metaphor. It is happening now, and it is not happening by chance. They have tried to silence us, to steal our essence, to suppress our divine truth through every means possible; through technology, through manipulation, through biological warfare. But here is where they made their fatal mistake: they underestimated the power of memory. They thought they could sever the connection between us and God. They thought they could extinguish the very thing that makes us human; the divine spark that lives in each of us. They thought they could turn us into hollow vessels, devoid of soul. But they are wrong. Because no matter how much they try to manipulate the frequencies, no matter how much they try to program us, there is one thing they cannot erase: our ability to remember who we are. They cannot erase our connection to God, our connection to love, our connection to truth. We are waking up. And when enough of us awaken, their entire system will collapse. Not because we “fight back” in the traditional sense; but because our souls will radiate a frequency so pure, so true, that their control will disintegrate in its presence. It is already happening. But we need your help. We need you to share this message, to carry this truth forward. It is not just a responsibility; it is a divine calling. The more of us who awaken, the more this system will crumble. It is already starting to happen. And that is why I am asking you... no, urging you; to like, share, and follow. Share this message with everyone you know. Let them feel the truth. Let them remember. Because this is bigger than us; it’s about saving humanity, reclaiming our divine birthright, and restoring what has been stolen from us for so long. And when you share it, you are not just sharing information. You are sharing a frequency; a wave of truth that can never be stopped. Every person who reads this, every person who feels it, is another soul who is waking up, another soul who is remembering their connection to God. So I ask you now, with all my heart: Do not let this message die here. Take it, carry it, share it. Because when we all awaken; together... the chains will break, and the truth will reign supreme. This is not the end. It is the beginning. Wake up. Feel God again. Remember who you are. This is our fight, and together, we will win.

Noah B. Price

25,791 次观看 • 1 幎前

Gray TV’s Jon Decker: “My first has to do with the blockade. There are lawmakers from both parties who claim the blockade is an act of war. What do you say to that? And my second question has to do with the fuel embargo of Cuba. How long, Mr. Secretary, will that last?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Okay. Two things. All right. Good. I’ll answer both your questions because I like the second one too. The first one on the blockade. And why do we have a blockade? We have a blockade because they shut down the streets. So, I don’t know which members of Congress you’re talking to, but here’s what I would ask them. I would ask everybody here. It’s very simple. These guys have shut down the Straits of Hormuz. This is what Iran is saying. We will shut down the Straits. No one can go through. No country in the world can go through unless we allow you to go through and you have to pay us. But our ships can go through — meaning the Iranian ships — as much as they want. That’s crazy. Who would agree to that? So, how are we going to have a situation where they get to close the straits to everybody, and the only people who are allowed to go through there 100 percent without paying anything are the Iranians. If you do that, they’ll keep the Straits closed forever. They’re trying to make this some new normal, okay? Under no circumstances can we ever allow them to normalize the fact that they get to blow up commercial ships and put mines in the water. So, the response to that is we’re going to blockade your ships. If everyone ships are not getting out, your ships are not getting out either. That’s not an act of war. That’s a defensive measure. It’s a counter to what they have decided to do. You know what is an act of war is? Putting mines in the water. Why don’t the members of Congress, whoever it is, is complaining about it. They should be all over that. These guys put mines in the water that you mining in the water is illegal, period, under any circumstances. And they’ve done it. But this is crazy stuff. But this is what they’ve done. On Cuba — oil blockade on Cuba — there’s no oil blockade on Cuba per se. Here’s what’s happening with Cuba. Cuba used to get free oil from Venezuela, used to give them a bunch of free oil. They would take like 60 percent of that oil and resell it for cash. It wouldn’t even go to benefit the people. So, the only blockade that’s happened is the Cubans have decided, I mean, the Venezuelans have decided we’re not giving you free oil anymore. And you can only imagine nowadays, the way oil prices are, no one’s giving away free oil, much less to a failed regime. So, the problem of Cuba is worse, okay? There are economic model doesn’t work, doesn’t work. And the people who are in charge can’t fix it. And the reason that I can’t fix it is not just because they’re communists. That’s bad enough, but they’re incompetent communists. The — the only thing worse than a communist is an incompetent one. And that’s what incompetent communists run that country. They don’t know how to fix it. They really don’t. And we have 90 miles from our shores, a failed state that also happens to be friendly territory for some of our adversaries. So it’s an unacceptable status quo, and we’ll be addressing it, but not today.”
2:34

Gray TV’s Jon Decker: “My first has to do with the blockade. There are lawmakers from both parties who claim the blockade is an act of war. What do you say to that? And my second question has to do with the fuel embargo of Cuba. How long, Mr. Secretary, will that last?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Okay. Two things. All right. Good. I’ll answer both your questions because I like the second one too. The first one on the blockade. And why do we have a blockade? We have a blockade because they shut down the streets. So, I don’t know which members of Congress you’re talking to, but here’s what I would ask them. I would ask everybody here. It’s very simple. These guys have shut down the Straits of Hormuz. This is what Iran is saying. We will shut down the Straits. No one can go through. No country in the world can go through unless we allow you to go through and you have to pay us. But our ships can go through — meaning the Iranian ships — as much as they want. That’s crazy. Who would agree to that? So, how are we going to have a situation where they get to close the straits to everybody, and the only people who are allowed to go through there 100 percent without paying anything are the Iranians. If you do that, they’ll keep the Straits closed forever. They’re trying to make this some new normal, okay? Under no circumstances can we ever allow them to normalize the fact that they get to blow up commercial ships and put mines in the water. So, the response to that is we’re going to blockade your ships. If everyone ships are not getting out, your ships are not getting out either. That’s not an act of war. That’s a defensive measure. It’s a counter to what they have decided to do. You know what is an act of war is? Putting mines in the water. Why don’t the members of Congress, whoever it is, is complaining about it. They should be all over that. These guys put mines in the water that you mining in the water is illegal, period, under any circumstances. And they’ve done it. But this is crazy stuff. But this is what they’ve done. On Cuba — oil blockade on Cuba — there’s no oil blockade on Cuba per se. Here’s what’s happening with Cuba. Cuba used to get free oil from Venezuela, used to give them a bunch of free oil. They would take like 60 percent of that oil and resell it for cash. It wouldn’t even go to benefit the people. So, the only blockade that’s happened is the Cubans have decided, I mean, the Venezuelans have decided we’re not giving you free oil anymore. And you can only imagine nowadays, the way oil prices are, no one’s giving away free oil, much less to a failed regime. So, the problem of Cuba is worse, okay? There are economic model doesn’t work, doesn’t work. And the people who are in charge can’t fix it. And the reason that I can’t fix it is not just because they’re communists. That’s bad enough, but they’re incompetent communists. The — the only thing worse than a communist is an incompetent one. And that’s what incompetent communists run that country. They don’t know how to fix it. They really don’t. And we have 90 miles from our shores, a failed state that also happens to be friendly territory for some of our adversaries. So it’s an unacceptable status quo, and we’ll be addressing it, but not today.”

Curtis Houck

47,845 次观看 • 4 䞪月前

A Christian friend of mine called me last night to talk about the problem of animal suffering because of Alex O'Connor’s debate with William Lane Craig. He was concerned because he thinks that Alex made a good argument. Before I give my thoughts let’s get one thing straight: This is not a logical argument, it’s an emotional argument. The atheist always taps into our emotions to when they talk about this. We’re asked to think of things like a Zebra getting his windpipe crushed by a lion so that as we deal with the argument we’re feeling, rather than thinking. So before I give a few brief remarks, let’s all turn our brains back on and the feelings off (if you can) and actually consider this rationally. 1. Alex and many other atheists bring up suffering as if it adds onto itself, so here’s one instance of suffering and that’s one, and here’s another instance in another animal so that’s two, three, etc
 but why? Why are we adding up individual creature suffering and putting it all into the same bin of “suffering?” Every individual experiences its own local suffering, that’s it. There’s no aggregate. There’s no “pool of suffering.” The move to stack one animal’s suffering on top of another animal is silly. I don’t see any justification for it. 2. Suffering just means not getting what you want, that’s it, and it’s temporary. Yesterday at the pool my daughter stubbed her toe. She said “ow!” She hopped around, and then she forgot all about it and went back to playing. It wasn’t a big deal. Atheists act like suffering is just the end of the world and frankly it’s childish. We all suffer, we all don’t get what we want, so what? Why is God obligated to give us what we want all the time? He isn’t. Not only that but suffering can make people better, it helps you appreciate things, learn lessons, etc. There’s nothing about suffering that indicates it’s some kind of evil thing that God must stop and shouldn’t be allowing. To really make my point imagine a world without suffering and then someone gets a tummy ache. He’s now suffering. Should we now think God doesn’t exist because one man got an ache in his tum tum? I think not. What about two aches, in two tum tums? See where I’m going? There’s nothing incompatible with God and suffering. This is just emotional manipulation. 3. Suffering has a lot to do with frame of reference. If you turned a human into an ant, they’d probably suffer a lot, but that’s because they know what it is to not be an ant. Compared to a human, ants live very difficult lives. But does the ant know that? No, an ant is just an ant. That’s all it knows. It has no frame of reference and what we might find horrible, an ant finds mundane and normal. In other words, it’s entirely possible that animals don’t suffer nearly as much as we think they do, and the only reason we think they suffer is because we’re projecting ourselves onto them. If WE were them, we wouldn’t like it. But that doesn’t necessarily follow, I would hate to be a fly eating poop all day, but does a fly suffer when they eat poop? No, they love it. The other day I saw a video of a woman with no arms, just legs. She could do everything—drive, get dressed, etc. When we see a woman without arms we imagine they’re suffering because we love our arms, but she’s never had them. So is she suffering? Or is this just all she knows? So it’s not obvious that animals suffer anywhere near as much as we imagine they do. 4. Lastly, according to what worldview is suffering “bad?” When the atheist points at suffering as an evil/bad thing, are they doing that from their atheism, or from our worldview as Christians? Does the atheist need to borrow from our worldview to even make sense of the idea that there’s something wrong with suffering? Or are they able to conjure this metaphysical idea of “badness” up on atheism as well? This really needs to be pushed on. I don’t think for one second that atheism can account for something like “badness,” so the very thing they want to complain about is totally fine according to their own worldview. If that’s the case, which worldview is less likely to be true
 the Christian worldview where we have sin and badness, or the atheist worldview where things just happen, events
 and the moral dimension is nothing but a programmed illusion? I think it goes without saying that the atheist worldview is far less likely to be true if that’s the case, and if it isn’t, the atheist has a lot of work to do in explaining how their absurd worldview can make sense of why wrongness exists. We need to stop granting atheists access to metaphysics that make absolutely no sense on their own worldview.
13:53

A Christian friend of mine called me last night to talk about the problem of animal suffering because of Alex O'Connor’s debate with William Lane Craig. He was concerned because he thinks that Alex made a good argument. Before I give my thoughts let’s get one thing straight: This is not a logical argument, it’s an emotional argument. The atheist always taps into our emotions to when they talk about this. We’re asked to think of things like a Zebra getting his windpipe crushed by a lion so that as we deal with the argument we’re feeling, rather than thinking. So before I give a few brief remarks, let’s all turn our brains back on and the feelings off (if you can) and actually consider this rationally. 1. Alex and many other atheists bring up suffering as if it adds onto itself, so here’s one instance of suffering and that’s one, and here’s another instance in another animal so that’s two, three, etc
 but why? Why are we adding up individual creature suffering and putting it all into the same bin of “suffering?” Every individual experiences its own local suffering, that’s it. There’s no aggregate. There’s no “pool of suffering.” The move to stack one animal’s suffering on top of another animal is silly. I don’t see any justification for it. 2. Suffering just means not getting what you want, that’s it, and it’s temporary. Yesterday at the pool my daughter stubbed her toe. She said “ow!” She hopped around, and then she forgot all about it and went back to playing. It wasn’t a big deal. Atheists act like suffering is just the end of the world and frankly it’s childish. We all suffer, we all don’t get what we want, so what? Why is God obligated to give us what we want all the time? He isn’t. Not only that but suffering can make people better, it helps you appreciate things, learn lessons, etc. There’s nothing about suffering that indicates it’s some kind of evil thing that God must stop and shouldn’t be allowing. To really make my point imagine a world without suffering and then someone gets a tummy ache. He’s now suffering. Should we now think God doesn’t exist because one man got an ache in his tum tum? I think not. What about two aches, in two tum tums? See where I’m going? There’s nothing incompatible with God and suffering. This is just emotional manipulation. 3. Suffering has a lot to do with frame of reference. If you turned a human into an ant, they’d probably suffer a lot, but that’s because they know what it is to not be an ant. Compared to a human, ants live very difficult lives. But does the ant know that? No, an ant is just an ant. That’s all it knows. It has no frame of reference and what we might find horrible, an ant finds mundane and normal. In other words, it’s entirely possible that animals don’t suffer nearly as much as we think they do, and the only reason we think they suffer is because we’re projecting ourselves onto them. If WE were them, we wouldn’t like it. But that doesn’t necessarily follow, I would hate to be a fly eating poop all day, but does a fly suffer when they eat poop? No, they love it. The other day I saw a video of a woman with no arms, just legs. She could do everything—drive, get dressed, etc. When we see a woman without arms we imagine they’re suffering because we love our arms, but she’s never had them. So is she suffering? Or is this just all she knows? So it’s not obvious that animals suffer anywhere near as much as we imagine they do. 4. Lastly, according to what worldview is suffering “bad?” When the atheist points at suffering as an evil/bad thing, are they doing that from their atheism, or from our worldview as Christians? Does the atheist need to borrow from our worldview to even make sense of the idea that there’s something wrong with suffering? Or are they able to conjure this metaphysical idea of “badness” up on atheism as well? This really needs to be pushed on. I don’t think for one second that atheism can account for something like “badness,” so the very thing they want to complain about is totally fine according to their own worldview. If that’s the case, which worldview is less likely to be true
 the Christian worldview where we have sin and badness, or the atheist worldview where things just happen, events
 and the moral dimension is nothing but a programmed illusion? I think it goes without saying that the atheist worldview is far less likely to be true if that’s the case, and if it isn’t, the atheist has a lot of work to do in explaining how their absurd worldview can make sense of why wrongness exists. We need to stop granting atheists access to metaphysics that make absolutely no sense on their own worldview.

Darwin to Jesus

12,751 次观看 • 3 䞪月前

🚚 WARNING: TOMORROW WILL BE THE WORST DAY OF 2026!! The U.S.-Iran peace deal just got officially CANCELLED. When the market opens on Monday, it won’t be “just macro pressure” anymore. There’s a geopolitical trigger building underneath it all. Stocks will dump. Metals will dump. Crypto will take the hardest hit. Smart money is already exiting. They’re not taking profits. They’re building cash positions because something deeper is starting to break. The dollar is weakening in real time. This is not a one-day shock. This is pressure building across multiple fronts at the same time. And now there’s another layer being added: U.S.-Iran peace deal just got officially cancelled. After 5 days of negotiations, both sides walked away with no agreement. That changes everything. Because when diplomacy fails, uncertainty becomes IMMEDIATE. And markets don’t price “possibility.” They price escalation. There are only a few ways this plays out from here, and they are NOT equal: 1⃣ SOFT OUTCOME Backchannel talks resume, tensions cool, markets stabilize after initial volatility. 2⃣ ESCALATION PHASE No progress, tensions build, and markets begin pricing prolonged conflict risk. 3⃣ HARD BREAK Situation deteriorates rapidly, and the market reprices oil, risk, and global stability in hours. That last one is where things get dangerous. Because this isn’t happening in isolation. At the same time: → Bonds are being sold aggressively → Yields are rising fast → The dollar is losing stability → Liquidity is tightening Now connect the dots. When geopolitical risk collides with a fragile financial system, reactions don’t stay contained. They COLLAPSE. Oil doesn’t move slowly. It reprices violently. Capital doesn’t rotate calmly. It rushes to safety all at once. And risk assets? They don’t “dip.” They DUMP HARD. This is how chain reactions begin. Because once markets start pricing duration instead of shock, everything changes. Inflation expectations rise. Central banks get trapped. And policy responses come too late. That’s when the real damage happens. This could still pass as a short-term scare. But if markets start pricing escalation into next week, This is no longer noise. This is a regime shift. Not a pullback. Not a buying opportunity. A STRUCTURAL CHANGE in how risk is priced across the system. Pay attention to flows. Watch oil. Watch bonds. Watch volatility. Because once this accelerates, it doesn’t give you time to react. I’ve spent years tracking macro turning points and market reactions like this. When the next move becomes clear, I’ll share it. Follow and turn notifications on. Because by the time it hits the headlines, it’s already too late.
0:23

🚚 WARNING: TOMORROW WILL BE THE WORST DAY OF 2026!! The U.S.-Iran peace deal just got officially CANCELLED. When the market opens on Monday, it won’t be “just macro pressure” anymore. There’s a geopolitical trigger building underneath it all. Stocks will dump. Metals will dump. Crypto will take the hardest hit. Smart money is already exiting. They’re not taking profits. They’re building cash positions because something deeper is starting to break. The dollar is weakening in real time. This is not a one-day shock. This is pressure building across multiple fronts at the same time. And now there’s another layer being added: U.S.-Iran peace deal just got officially cancelled. After 5 days of negotiations, both sides walked away with no agreement. That changes everything. Because when diplomacy fails, uncertainty becomes IMMEDIATE. And markets don’t price “possibility.” They price escalation. There are only a few ways this plays out from here, and they are NOT equal: 1⃣ SOFT OUTCOME Backchannel talks resume, tensions cool, markets stabilize after initial volatility. 2⃣ ESCALATION PHASE No progress, tensions build, and markets begin pricing prolonged conflict risk. 3⃣ HARD BREAK Situation deteriorates rapidly, and the market reprices oil, risk, and global stability in hours. That last one is where things get dangerous. Because this isn’t happening in isolation. At the same time: → Bonds are being sold aggressively → Yields are rising fast → The dollar is losing stability → Liquidity is tightening Now connect the dots. When geopolitical risk collides with a fragile financial system, reactions don’t stay contained. They COLLAPSE. Oil doesn’t move slowly. It reprices violently. Capital doesn’t rotate calmly. It rushes to safety all at once. And risk assets? They don’t “dip.” They DUMP HARD. This is how chain reactions begin. Because once markets start pricing duration instead of shock, everything changes. Inflation expectations rise. Central banks get trapped. And policy responses come too late. That’s when the real damage happens. This could still pass as a short-term scare. But if markets start pricing escalation into next week, This is no longer noise. This is a regime shift. Not a pullback. Not a buying opportunity. A STRUCTURAL CHANGE in how risk is priced across the system. Pay attention to flows. Watch oil. Watch bonds. Watch volatility. Because once this accelerates, it doesn’t give you time to react. I’ve spent years tracking macro turning points and market reactions like this. When the next move becomes clear, I’ll share it. Follow and turn notifications on. Because by the time it hits the headlines, it’s already too late.

0xNobler

2,218,550 次观看 • 5 䞪月前

DOOCY TIME: “And the Supreme Court tomorrow is going to hear arguments about your executive order trying to get rate of birthright citizenship.” President Trump: “And I’m going.” Fox’s Peter Doocy: “You’re going to go to the Supreme Court tomorrow?” Trump: “I think so.” Doocy: “And just sit there and listen?” Trump: “Because I have listened to this argument for so long and this is not about Chinese billionaires who are billionaires from other countries who, all of a sudden have 75 children or 59 children in one case or 10 children becoming American citizens. This was about slaves and if you take a look, slaves, we’re talking about slaves from the Civil War. And if you take a look at when it was filed, all of this legislation, all of this, everything having to do with birthright citizenship, it was at the end of the Civil War. The reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves and the protection of the babies of slaves. It didn’t have to do with the protection of multi-millionaires and billionaires wanting to have their children get an American citizenship. It is the craziest thing I’ve ever seen. It’s been so badly handled by legal people over the years. If you look at the original birthright citizenship papers — they all happened right after the Civil War — the reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves. And hopefully it’s going to say, because our country is being scammed. We’re getting all of these people — they’re selling the rights to them. People are making a living — a big living — getting hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars from bringing people in and saying, ‘congratulations, your whole family is going to be a citizen of the United States of America.’ That’s not what it was for. It wasn’t for billionaires bringing people in their family and it was for the children of slaves. And what you really have to do, and I don’t think the lawyers talk about it as much, look at when the Civil War ended and look at the date of when this was enacted, okay? Doocy: “Have you been to the Supreme Court before? Is this going to be your first time going to the Supreme Court?” Trump: “No, I went once before, the opening of the Supreme Court and the last administration. Doocy: “And which justices will you be listening for most closely?” Trump: “I love a few of them. I don’t like some others. And you know, you say what you want, but you have the ones that were appointed by Barack Hussein Obama and Biden. I don’t care how good your cases — you could have the greatest case ever, they’re going to rule against you. They always do. And it’s not supposed to be that way. Now, the Republicans tend to be very different. They want to show how honorable they are, so a man can appoint them and they can rule against them. It’s so proud of him. We’re so proud we ruled against Trump. We’re so proud. We’re above it. There are those that say that’s wonderful. And there are those that say they’re so stupid. But the Democrats never fail at one thing. When Barack Hussein Obama or when Biden appoint somebody, they go along that line, you can have the greatest case in history. And almost, I guess I have to say almost, maybe I don’t have to say it, almost without fail, those people, four of them, sometimes five of them, but four of them will vote against you. You don’t have a chance. You don’t have a chance, and that’s not what the court system is. Now, the Republican appointees tend to go — and this has been long before me, this has been for many years. Some people would call it stupidity. Some people would call it disloyalty. Some people would say they’re right in doing it. And I don’t mind being right, but the other side almost never does it. Almost. I think you could find maybe a couple of instance — almost never does. When a Democrat appoints a judge — and I’m talking about judges, not just justices — you go before some of these Democrat judges in Washington, D.C. and you don’t have a chance. That’s why I gave pardons to hundreds of people that were so badly treated having to deal with J6.”
4:24

DOOCY TIME: “And the Supreme Court tomorrow is going to hear arguments about your executive order trying to get rate of birthright citizenship.” President Trump: “And I’m going.” Fox’s Peter Doocy: “You’re going to go to the Supreme Court tomorrow?” Trump: “I think so.” Doocy: “And just sit there and listen?” Trump: “Because I have listened to this argument for so long and this is not about Chinese billionaires who are billionaires from other countries who, all of a sudden have 75 children or 59 children in one case or 10 children becoming American citizens. This was about slaves and if you take a look, slaves, we’re talking about slaves from the Civil War. And if you take a look at when it was filed, all of this legislation, all of this, everything having to do with birthright citizenship, it was at the end of the Civil War. The reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves and the protection of the babies of slaves. It didn’t have to do with the protection of multi-millionaires and billionaires wanting to have their children get an American citizenship. It is the craziest thing I’ve ever seen. It’s been so badly handled by legal people over the years. If you look at the original birthright citizenship papers — they all happened right after the Civil War — the reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves. And hopefully it’s going to say, because our country is being scammed. We’re getting all of these people — they’re selling the rights to them. People are making a living — a big living — getting hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars from bringing people in and saying, ‘congratulations, your whole family is going to be a citizen of the United States of America.’ That’s not what it was for. It wasn’t for billionaires bringing people in their family and it was for the children of slaves. And what you really have to do, and I don’t think the lawyers talk about it as much, look at when the Civil War ended and look at the date of when this was enacted, okay? Doocy: “Have you been to the Supreme Court before? Is this going to be your first time going to the Supreme Court?” Trump: “No, I went once before, the opening of the Supreme Court and the last administration. Doocy: “And which justices will you be listening for most closely?” Trump: “I love a few of them. I don’t like some others. And you know, you say what you want, but you have the ones that were appointed by Barack Hussein Obama and Biden. I don’t care how good your cases — you could have the greatest case ever, they’re going to rule against you. They always do. And it’s not supposed to be that way. Now, the Republicans tend to be very different. They want to show how honorable they are, so a man can appoint them and they can rule against them. It’s so proud of him. We’re so proud we ruled against Trump. We’re so proud. We’re above it. There are those that say that’s wonderful. And there are those that say they’re so stupid. But the Democrats never fail at one thing. When Barack Hussein Obama or when Biden appoint somebody, they go along that line, you can have the greatest case in history. And almost, I guess I have to say almost, maybe I don’t have to say it, almost without fail, those people, four of them, sometimes five of them, but four of them will vote against you. You don’t have a chance. You don’t have a chance, and that’s not what the court system is. Now, the Republican appointees tend to go — and this has been long before me, this has been for many years. Some people would call it stupidity. Some people would call it disloyalty. Some people would say they’re right in doing it. And I don’t mind being right, but the other side almost never does it. Almost. I think you could find maybe a couple of instance — almost never does. When a Democrat appoints a judge — and I’m talking about judges, not just justices — you go before some of these Democrat judges in Washington, D.C. and you don’t have a chance. That’s why I gave pardons to hundreds of people that were so badly treated having to deal with J6.”

Curtis Houck

369,083 次观看 • 5 䞪月前