Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 THIS IS WHAT SECURE ELECTIONS CAUSE! 2021: DeSantis bans unsolicited mass mail, Zuckerbucks, restricts drop boxes 🔴 R+100K by voter registration 2022: DeSantis creates election police and further blocks ballot harvesting 🔴 R+400K 2023: 🔴 R+800K 2024: 🔴 R+1.15M 2025: 🔴 R+1.46M 2026: 🔴 R+1.54M "We increase penalties...

EricLDaugh's profile picture

Eric Daugherty

1,180,241 subscribers

77,503 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

BildungComedyNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 BREAKING — TEXAS 02/24/26 Video Williamson Co. Republicans showed up at Commissioners Court today to demand answers about an unauthorized joint primary election — with commingled R and D ballots in the same boxes, combined voter check-in, unauthorized ballot marking devices, wrong ballots, and concerns about ballot chain of custody as cameras go dark and clocks skip ahead. EA Bridgette Escobedo is exercising powers the law reserves for a joint primary agreement that there is no evidence the Commissioners Court ever authorized. WilCo Republicans packed Commissioners Court demanding answers about a primary election that doesn't match the law, the contract, or this court's own records. Republican and Democratic voter registration and ballot boxes are COMMINGLED — with Democrats running the Republican primary. There is no evidence the Commissioners Court voted to authorize a joint primary under §172.126(a). Their own minutes from the only primary-related agenda item state: "No action was taken on this item." Yet every operational element of this election matches a joint primary. What WilCo Republican voters are experiencing right now: 🔴 Commingled R and D database, equipment, and ballot boxes 🔴 Combined voter check-in — one system, both parties 🔴 Ballot marking devices the CEC and CC never adopted or approved as required by §123.001(b)(2) 🔴 A "Federal" ballot showing only 2 races instead of the full Republican primary 🔴 Democratic co-clerks steering Republicans to electronic marking devices 🔴 Concerns about ballot chain of custody camera coverage and manipulation Republican voters were steered toward an unauthorized "Federal" ballot programmed onto the machines — giving them only 2 races instead of the full primary ballot. Down-ballot Republican candidates never appeared on these ballots. The SOS Director of Elections has reportedly acknowledged this ballot was not supposed to be accessible to in-person voters. How many voters were affected? The commissioners unanimously approved spending over $1 MILLION to move to hand-marked paper ballots. Instead, dozens of ExpressVote barcode machines were deployed at nearly every early voting location and — according to our County Chair — workers were instructed to offer and encourage electronic voting. The only known contract is a §31.093 separate primary — which says in its own text that the EA "may not prevent" the county chair from supervising the election. But the EA selected the voting system, programmed the ballot format, chose the locations, conducted all training, and established all procedures — powers that under the Election Code belong only to the county clerk (or EA if County has one) in a §172.126 joint primary. Then EA ignored the County Chair when she called foul. Why does the framework matter? Under a separate primary agreement, the Republican Party independently oversees its own election. Under a joint primary agreement, the county EA and Commissioners take control of everything. When ballots are commingled, check-in is combined, and workers are shared — the party loses all ability to protect the security and purity of our election nor can independently verify its own primary results. Today I called on the Commissioners Court to: ✅ Convene a special session on the primary framework If we got more than 2:50 seconds, ask to: Direct the EA to identify her specific statutory authority — on the record ✅ Separate the scanners, ballot boxes, voter lists, and check-in immediately ✅ Remove the unauthorized BMDs and unauthorized ballot format ✅ Refer the matter for investigation Once R and D ballots are commingled without authorization, the security and purity of the ballot box is destroyed — and it cannot be restored. Neither party can independently verify its own ballots are legal. That's not a procedural issue. That's a constitutional violation under Article VI, §4 of the Texas Constitution. We're asking questions that deserve answers. 🇺🇸
2:50

🚨 BREAKING — TEXAS 02/24/26 Video Williamson Co. Republicans showed up at Commissioners Court today to demand answers about an unauthorized joint primary election — with commingled R and D ballots in the same boxes, combined voter check-in, unauthorized ballot marking devices, wrong ballots, and concerns about ballot chain of custody as cameras go dark and clocks skip ahead. EA Bridgette Escobedo is exercising powers the law reserves for a joint primary agreement that there is no evidence the Commissioners Court ever authorized. WilCo Republicans packed Commissioners Court demanding answers about a primary election that doesn't match the law, the contract, or this court's own records. Republican and Democratic voter registration and ballot boxes are COMMINGLED — with Democrats running the Republican primary. There is no evidence the Commissioners Court voted to authorize a joint primary under §172.126(a). Their own minutes from the only primary-related agenda item state: "No action was taken on this item." Yet every operational element of this election matches a joint primary. What WilCo Republican voters are experiencing right now: 🔴 Commingled R and D database, equipment, and ballot boxes 🔴 Combined voter check-in — one system, both parties 🔴 Ballot marking devices the CEC and CC never adopted or approved as required by §123.001(b)(2) 🔴 A "Federal" ballot showing only 2 races instead of the full Republican primary 🔴 Democratic co-clerks steering Republicans to electronic marking devices 🔴 Concerns about ballot chain of custody camera coverage and manipulation Republican voters were steered toward an unauthorized "Federal" ballot programmed onto the machines — giving them only 2 races instead of the full primary ballot. Down-ballot Republican candidates never appeared on these ballots. The SOS Director of Elections has reportedly acknowledged this ballot was not supposed to be accessible to in-person voters. How many voters were affected? The commissioners unanimously approved spending over $1 MILLION to move to hand-marked paper ballots. Instead, dozens of ExpressVote barcode machines were deployed at nearly every early voting location and — according to our County Chair — workers were instructed to offer and encourage electronic voting. The only known contract is a §31.093 separate primary — which says in its own text that the EA "may not prevent" the county chair from supervising the election. But the EA selected the voting system, programmed the ballot format, chose the locations, conducted all training, and established all procedures — powers that under the Election Code belong only to the county clerk (or EA if County has one) in a §172.126 joint primary. Then EA ignored the County Chair when she called foul. Why does the framework matter? Under a separate primary agreement, the Republican Party independently oversees its own election. Under a joint primary agreement, the county EA and Commissioners take control of everything. When ballots are commingled, check-in is combined, and workers are shared — the party loses all ability to protect the security and purity of our election nor can independently verify its own primary results. Today I called on the Commissioners Court to: ✅ Convene a special session on the primary framework If we got more than 2:50 seconds, ask to: Direct the EA to identify her specific statutory authority — on the record ✅ Separate the scanners, ballot boxes, voter lists, and check-in immediately ✅ Remove the unauthorized BMDs and unauthorized ballot format ✅ Refer the matter for investigation Once R and D ballots are commingled without authorization, the security and purity of the ballot box is destroyed — and it cannot be restored. Neither party can independently verify its own ballots are legal. That's not a procedural issue. That's a constitutional violation under Article VI, §4 of the Texas Constitution. We're asking questions that deserve answers. 🇺🇸

Lori Gallagher

57,577 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 BOOM! Even CNN just got destroyed by their own poll! 85% of White Americans 82% of Latinos 76% of Black Americans ALL want PHOTO ID to vote! 🇺🇸 This is a TOTAL BLOW to the Democrats' cheat machine. They don't want secure elections — they want open borders and ballot harvesting. Trump is RIGHT. Pass the SAVE America Act NOW and secure our elections! No more excuses from RINOs or Dems. Real Americans demand it. Do you support nationwide Voter ID and the SAVE Act? A. YES B. NO Drop your thoughts below and Give me a Thumbs-Up👍, if you support this! 🇺🇸
0:27

🚨 BOOM! Even CNN just got destroyed by their own poll! 85% of White Americans 82% of Latinos 76% of Black Americans ALL want PHOTO ID to vote! 🇺🇸 This is a TOTAL BLOW to the Democrats' cheat machine. They don't want secure elections — they want open borders and ballot harvesting. Trump is RIGHT. Pass the SAVE America Act NOW and secure our elections! No more excuses from RINOs or Dems. Real Americans demand it. Do you support nationwide Voter ID and the SAVE Act? A. YES B. NO Drop your thoughts below and Give me a Thumbs-Up👍, if you support this! 🇺🇸

Right Scope 🇺🇸

60,143 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

How did Democrats make election fraud legal in California? We investigated. This is insane. Check this out… Election fraud is institutional and codified into law in California. According to the Secretary of State’s website: - Anyone can register to vote from ANYWHERE, including a ‘public park’ or a ‘street corner’ - No voter ID - No signature required - Mail votes to every ‘voter’ - No limits of ballot harvesting. Anyone can drop off any number of ballots at anytime (!!!) - Unmonitored drop boxes everywhere - Do not count a single vote until AFTER the election (most states count early votes and mail votes BEFORE election) - Keep counting unsigned, unaccountable, no address mail ballots for 7 days after Election Day - Votes certified 5 WEEKS after election by Secretary of State This is a system of fraud specifically designed to manufacture votes in races you need to win and make the fraud untraceable. An example: There’s 100,000 homeless in L.A. Democrats pay them to register to vote (this has been documented on video). Many are registered to toilets in empty parking lots. Where do those ballots go? Who ‘votes’ for them and collects the ballots? Who cares. It’s all legal and untraceable. That is how Democrats make election fraud legal. Give Democrats power again and they will institute this system in your state by law. This is why we must Pass the SAVE America Act now!
8:33

How did Democrats make election fraud legal in California? We investigated. This is insane. Check this out… Election fraud is institutional and codified into law in California. According to the Secretary of State’s website: - Anyone can register to vote from ANYWHERE, including a ‘public park’ or a ‘street corner’ - No voter ID - No signature required - Mail votes to every ‘voter’ - No limits of ballot harvesting. Anyone can drop off any number of ballots at anytime (!!!) - Unmonitored drop boxes everywhere - Do not count a single vote until AFTER the election (most states count early votes and mail votes BEFORE election) - Keep counting unsigned, unaccountable, no address mail ballots for 7 days after Election Day - Votes certified 5 WEEKS after election by Secretary of State This is a system of fraud specifically designed to manufacture votes in races you need to win and make the fraud untraceable. An example: There’s 100,000 homeless in L.A. Democrats pay them to register to vote (this has been documented on video). Many are registered to toilets in empty parking lots. Where do those ballots go? Who ‘votes’ for them and collects the ballots? Who cares. It’s all legal and untraceable. That is how Democrats make election fraud legal. Give Democrats power again and they will institute this system in your state by law. This is why we must Pass the SAVE America Act now!

Benny Johnson

302,558 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Gov. Gavin Newsom said he has a secret “break the glass” plan to prevent California from electing a Republican governor. He recently signed a law that states mail in ballots signatures do not have to match. SB73 Section 3. Clause F reads : (f) A vote by mail voter observer shall not be permitted to challenge a signature on a vote by mail ballot return envelope pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 3019, or on statements completed pursuant to subdivisions (d) and (e) of Section 3019, on the basis that they believe the signature does not compare with the signatures appearing in the voter’s registration record. There’s no election integrity in California. ❌ Mail in ballots to every Californian and even if you moved state, you’ll still get a ballot. ❌ signatures do not need to match ❌ unsecured drop boxes that get vandalized and set on fire ❌ months of counting with ballots being flown in by helicopter. ❌ No voter ID ❌ “Honor system” for voter registration. Until election integrity is addressed we will never have a balanced state.
0:48

Gov. Gavin Newsom said he has a secret “break the glass” plan to prevent California from electing a Republican governor. He recently signed a law that states mail in ballots signatures do not have to match. SB73 Section 3. Clause F reads : (f) A vote by mail voter observer shall not be permitted to challenge a signature on a vote by mail ballot return envelope pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 3019, or on statements completed pursuant to subdivisions (d) and (e) of Section 3019, on the basis that they believe the signature does not compare with the signatures appearing in the voter’s registration record. There’s no election integrity in California. ❌ Mail in ballots to every Californian and even if you moved state, you’ll still get a ballot. ❌ signatures do not need to match ❌ unsecured drop boxes that get vandalized and set on fire ❌ months of counting with ballots being flown in by helicopter. ❌ No voter ID ❌ “Honor system” for voter registration. Until election integrity is addressed we will never have a balanced state.

Denise Aguilar

289,244 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 JUST NOW: Florida Republicans are at NEAR-2024 LEVELS of mail-in voting share versus Democrats with 26 days to go KEEP THIS UP! It went from a D+1.5 shift from 2024 to only D+0.3 today In mail-in ballot return RATE, Republicans are currently AHEAD of their 2024 lead — R+0.4 now. Where's the blue wave? If there's a massive Dem surge, it's not showing up in Florida data, that's for sure! It's still too early, but to put this in perspective, you'd need an absolutely monumental Independent/NPA voter shift for Dems to even have a chance. And if that were happening, we'd expect to see a corresponding Dem surge in the mail...it's just not happening in Florida ☀️ Full tracker 24/7 on Florida’s Voice!
0:23

🚨 JUST NOW: Florida Republicans are at NEAR-2024 LEVELS of mail-in voting share versus Democrats with 26 days to go KEEP THIS UP! It went from a D+1.5 shift from 2024 to only D+0.3 today In mail-in ballot return RATE, Republicans are currently AHEAD of their 2024 lead — R+0.4 now. Where's the blue wave? If there's a massive Dem surge, it's not showing up in Florida data, that's for sure! It's still too early, but to put this in perspective, you'd need an absolutely monumental Independent/NPA voter shift for Dems to even have a chance. And if that were happening, we'd expect to see a corresponding Dem surge in the mail...it's just not happening in Florida ☀️ Full tracker 24/7 on Florida’s Voice!

Eric Daugherty

51,551 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

🚨 Breaking: TREASON IN PLAIN SIGHT The AIPAC All-Stars Just Sold Out America’s Sovereignty for a Foreign Military Merger 🚨 America is no longer run from Washington. It’s run from Tel Aviv and the boardrooms of AIPAC. While you were scrolling, 50+ U.S. Senators... almost the entire Republican Senate caucus... quietly lined up behind Section 219 of the NDAA FY 2027: The U.S.-Israel Military Merger. Not “alliance.” Not “aid.” A literal integration of: Our Defense Industrial Base, AI Warfare Systems, Quantum Tech, Missile Defense, Supply Chains, and Command Structures... with a Foreign Nation. This isn’t partnership. This is surrender of sovereignty with a Star of David (Remphan) stamp. Here is the full list of senators who voted to advance this: Kevin Armstrong (R-OK) Jim Banks (R-IN) John Barrasso (R-WY) Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) John Boozman (R-AR) Katie Britt (R-AL) Ted Budd (R-NC) Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) Bill Cassidy (R-LA) Susan Collins (R-ME) John Cornyn (R-TX) Tom Cotton (R-AR) Kevin Cramer (R-ND) Mike Crapo (R-ID) Ted Cruz (R-TX) John Curtis (R-UT) Steve Daines (R-MT) Joni Ernst (R-IA) Deb Fischer (R-NE) Lindsey Graham (R-SC) Chuck Grassley (R-IA) Bill Hagerty (R-TN) Josh Hawley (R-MO) John Hoeven (R-ND) Jon Husted (R-OH) Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS) Ron Johnson (R-WI) John Kennedy (R-LA) James Lankford (R-OK) Mike Lee (R-UT) Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) Roger Marshall (R-KS) Dave McCormick (R-PA) Moody (R-FL) Jerry Moran (R-KS) Bernie Moreno (R-OH) Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) Rand Paul (R-KY) Pete Ricketts (R-NE) Jim Risch (R-ID) Mike Rounds (R-SD) Eric Schmitt (R-MO) Rick Scott (R-FL) Tim Scott (R-SC) Tim Sheehy (R-MT) Dan Sullivan (R-AK) Thom Tillis (R-NC) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) Roger Wicker (R-MS) Todd Young (R-IN) Every single one of them are Israel First. They stood there like obedient schoolboys while the defense budget... YOUR tax dollars... Got wired into a permanent fusion with a foreign power’s military apparatus. Every American must be asking these questions RIGHT NOW: 1. When did “America First” become “Israel First… and America never”? 2. If integrating our most sensitive military AI and quantum systems with ANY foreign nation isn’t a textbook violation of sovereignty, what the hell is? 3. Why do these same senators scream about “China threat” while merging our defense base with a country that has a history of espionage against us (see: Pollard, the Lavon Affair, USS Liberty, and multiple declassified incidents)? 4. How many millions in AIPAC-linked donations and dark money flowed before these votes? 5. What happens when the next war breaks out and American boys are sent to die because our systems are now inseparably linked? 6. Under the Crimes Act of 1790... Still on the books... Treason is Punishable by Death. So why are we pretending this is normal politics? This isn’t “supporting an ally.” Allies don’t demand you rewrite your defense architecture to mirror theirs. Allies don’t get veto power over your supply chains. Allies don’t turn your Congress into a rubber stamp. The “NOT LAW YET... WE CAN STOP IT” stamp on the NDAA section. This is a slow motion coup of the military-industrial complex by a foreign lobby so powerful that even mentioning it gets you labeled “antisemitic” while they openly buy politicians on both sides. George Washington’s warning about foreign entanglements. The 1790 treason statute. All of it. They delayed it once. That means we still have a narrow window. CALL TO ACTION: Make this the loudest post on X: - Tag every single senator above. - Demand they explain why they voted for a military merger. - Flood their offices: “REPEAL Section 219 or explain why you support surrendering U.S. defense sovereignty.” - Share this with every America First account, every veteran, every parent who doesn’t want their kids dying in another endless war for someone else’s interests. - Screenshot, repost, quote... break the algorithm. If we don’t stop this now, future historians will write that the American Republic died not with a bang, but with a vote on a defense bill most people never read. The Founding Fathers would have called this exactly what it is: Treason. Are you awake yet? Or will you keep hitting “like” while they finish selling the country? Drop Your Questions, What makes You Angry, and Your Demands below. Let’s make this impossible to ignore. Repost. Screenshot. Amplify. This is the hill. History is watching. Before you leave, bookmark the conversation and come back later to see what others have shared. Read through the responses, engage thoughtfully, ask questions, challenge ideas respectfully, and contribute to meaningful, productive discussion. Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if You''re not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are You doing?!
1:02

🚨 Breaking: TREASON IN PLAIN SIGHT The AIPAC All-Stars Just Sold Out America’s Sovereignty for a Foreign Military Merger 🚨 America is no longer run from Washington. It’s run from Tel Aviv and the boardrooms of AIPAC. While you were scrolling, 50+ U.S. Senators... almost the entire Republican Senate caucus... quietly lined up behind Section 219 of the NDAA FY 2027: The U.S.-Israel Military Merger. Not “alliance.” Not “aid.” A literal integration of: Our Defense Industrial Base, AI Warfare Systems, Quantum Tech, Missile Defense, Supply Chains, and Command Structures... with a Foreign Nation. This isn’t partnership. This is surrender of sovereignty with a Star of David (Remphan) stamp. Here is the full list of senators who voted to advance this: Kevin Armstrong (R-OK) Jim Banks (R-IN) John Barrasso (R-WY) Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) John Boozman (R-AR) Katie Britt (R-AL) Ted Budd (R-NC) Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) Bill Cassidy (R-LA) Susan Collins (R-ME) John Cornyn (R-TX) Tom Cotton (R-AR) Kevin Cramer (R-ND) Mike Crapo (R-ID) Ted Cruz (R-TX) John Curtis (R-UT) Steve Daines (R-MT) Joni Ernst (R-IA) Deb Fischer (R-NE) Lindsey Graham (R-SC) Chuck Grassley (R-IA) Bill Hagerty (R-TN) Josh Hawley (R-MO) John Hoeven (R-ND) Jon Husted (R-OH) Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS) Ron Johnson (R-WI) John Kennedy (R-LA) James Lankford (R-OK) Mike Lee (R-UT) Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) Roger Marshall (R-KS) Dave McCormick (R-PA) Moody (R-FL) Jerry Moran (R-KS) Bernie Moreno (R-OH) Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) Rand Paul (R-KY) Pete Ricketts (R-NE) Jim Risch (R-ID) Mike Rounds (R-SD) Eric Schmitt (R-MO) Rick Scott (R-FL) Tim Scott (R-SC) Tim Sheehy (R-MT) Dan Sullivan (R-AK) Thom Tillis (R-NC) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) Roger Wicker (R-MS) Todd Young (R-IN) Every single one of them are Israel First. They stood there like obedient schoolboys while the defense budget... YOUR tax dollars... Got wired into a permanent fusion with a foreign power’s military apparatus. Every American must be asking these questions RIGHT NOW: 1. When did “America First” become “Israel First… and America never”? 2. If integrating our most sensitive military AI and quantum systems with ANY foreign nation isn’t a textbook violation of sovereignty, what the hell is? 3. Why do these same senators scream about “China threat” while merging our defense base with a country that has a history of espionage against us (see: Pollard, the Lavon Affair, USS Liberty, and multiple declassified incidents)? 4. How many millions in AIPAC-linked donations and dark money flowed before these votes? 5. What happens when the next war breaks out and American boys are sent to die because our systems are now inseparably linked? 6. Under the Crimes Act of 1790... Still on the books... Treason is Punishable by Death. So why are we pretending this is normal politics? This isn’t “supporting an ally.” Allies don’t demand you rewrite your defense architecture to mirror theirs. Allies don’t get veto power over your supply chains. Allies don’t turn your Congress into a rubber stamp. The “NOT LAW YET... WE CAN STOP IT” stamp on the NDAA section. This is a slow motion coup of the military-industrial complex by a foreign lobby so powerful that even mentioning it gets you labeled “antisemitic” while they openly buy politicians on both sides. George Washington’s warning about foreign entanglements. The 1790 treason statute. All of it. They delayed it once. That means we still have a narrow window. CALL TO ACTION: Make this the loudest post on X: - Tag every single senator above. - Demand they explain why they voted for a military merger. - Flood their offices: “REPEAL Section 219 or explain why you support surrendering U.S. defense sovereignty.” - Share this with every America First account, every veteran, every parent who doesn’t want their kids dying in another endless war for someone else’s interests. - Screenshot, repost, quote... break the algorithm. If we don’t stop this now, future historians will write that the American Republic died not with a bang, but with a vote on a defense bill most people never read. The Founding Fathers would have called this exactly what it is: Treason. Are you awake yet? Or will you keep hitting “like” while they finish selling the country? Drop Your Questions, What makes You Angry, and Your Demands below. Let’s make this impossible to ignore. Repost. Screenshot. Amplify. This is the hill. History is watching. Before you leave, bookmark the conversation and come back later to see what others have shared. Read through the responses, engage thoughtfully, ask questions, challenge ideas respectfully, and contribute to meaningful, productive discussion. Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if You''re not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are You doing?!

Noah B. Price

126,567 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This is how Democrats stay in power in California US Attorney Bill Essayli was kicked off the Elections Committee by Democrats for fighting for Voter ID 🚨 He exposed how the State’s website allows ANYONE to receive mail in ballots without a drivers license or social security. You simply check the box, ‘I don’t have one’ and are sent a ballot “The Democrats in our legislature in Sacramento kicked me off my elections committee for fighting for you, the voters, and speaking up on voter id” “I'm on the website for the State of California to register to vote on the section where you put in your driver's license, your last four of your social, there's a box underneath each one. It says, I don't have one. I don't have one. And then you're allowed to proceed to go to vote. What is the agenda here? Why do we let people register to vote and we don't verify their immigration status? We need to instill confidence in our elections” Here’s how Democrats rig elections with those mail in ballots California moved aggressively toward universal mail-in ballots. Key steps included: - 2016-2018: Laws like the Voter’s Choice Act expanded vote-by-mail options. - 2020+ Permanent universal mail-in ballots, every registered voter gets a ballot mailed automatically Ballot harvesting third parties collecting and delivering ballots was also legalized and expanded The finishing blow: In 2024 SB 1174 was signed. It locked in the statewide no-ID standard And that right there is how you permanently rig elections forever No one can ever beat this voter fraud We need a federal audit of California elections The punishment for election fraud should be equivalent to the punishment for treason, because that’s exactly what it is
1:03

This is how Democrats stay in power in California US Attorney Bill Essayli was kicked off the Elections Committee by Democrats for fighting for Voter ID 🚨 He exposed how the State’s website allows ANYONE to receive mail in ballots without a drivers license or social security. You simply check the box, ‘I don’t have one’ and are sent a ballot “The Democrats in our legislature in Sacramento kicked me off my elections committee for fighting for you, the voters, and speaking up on voter id” “I'm on the website for the State of California to register to vote on the section where you put in your driver's license, your last four of your social, there's a box underneath each one. It says, I don't have one. I don't have one. And then you're allowed to proceed to go to vote. What is the agenda here? Why do we let people register to vote and we don't verify their immigration status? We need to instill confidence in our elections” Here’s how Democrats rig elections with those mail in ballots California moved aggressively toward universal mail-in ballots. Key steps included: - 2016-2018: Laws like the Voter’s Choice Act expanded vote-by-mail options. - 2020+ Permanent universal mail-in ballots, every registered voter gets a ballot mailed automatically Ballot harvesting third parties collecting and delivering ballots was also legalized and expanded The finishing blow: In 2024 SB 1174 was signed. It locked in the statewide no-ID standard And that right there is how you permanently rig elections forever No one can ever beat this voter fraud We need a federal audit of California elections The punishment for election fraud should be equivalent to the punishment for treason, because that’s exactly what it is

Wall Street Apes

229,102 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.
2:57

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.

Liz Wheeler

84,957 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 ELECTION INTEGRITY ALERT: California’s Mail-In Ballot Madness Drags Races for Weeks as “Late” Progressive Ballots Keep Flipping Results. The world is watching California’s shady vote counting, some races not called for days or even weeks. Officials claim they’re being “meticulous.” Yeah right. Mail-in ballots (heavily progressive) keep magically appearing at the last minute. Nithya Raman conceded… then suddenly surged ahead as more dropped. California mails ballots to every single eligible voter, dead or alive, moved out of state, or whatever. Sitting on them, uncertain if they’ll come back. Supreme Court still deciding how long they can accept mail-ins after Election Day. Why not just have a hard Election Day cutoff? Make it a holiday. Clear postmarks only. No more “good faith” nonsense. Sending millions of ballots creates massive opportunities for fraud, especially with unmonitored drop boxes. This looks like a recipe for mischief. Clean elections shouldn’t be this sloppy. Red, blue, or anywhere, Americans deserve secure voting. No more games. Fix it NOW. STOP THE CHEAT!
2:54

🚨 ELECTION INTEGRITY ALERT: California’s Mail-In Ballot Madness Drags Races for Weeks as “Late” Progressive Ballots Keep Flipping Results. The world is watching California’s shady vote counting, some races not called for days or even weeks. Officials claim they’re being “meticulous.” Yeah right. Mail-in ballots (heavily progressive) keep magically appearing at the last minute. Nithya Raman conceded… then suddenly surged ahead as more dropped. California mails ballots to every single eligible voter, dead or alive, moved out of state, or whatever. Sitting on them, uncertain if they’ll come back. Supreme Court still deciding how long they can accept mail-ins after Election Day. Why not just have a hard Election Day cutoff? Make it a holiday. Clear postmarks only. No more “good faith” nonsense. Sending millions of ballots creates massive opportunities for fraud, especially with unmonitored drop boxes. This looks like a recipe for mischief. Clean elections shouldn’t be this sloppy. Red, blue, or anywhere, Americans deserve secure voting. No more games. Fix it NOW. STOP THE CHEAT!

Gunther Eagleman™

56,180 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨THIS IS HOW THEY ADJUDICATED YOUR VOTE AWAY IN 2020 Georgia election supervisor walks through the Dominion software on camera and shows exactly how it worked: “So you made a vote for someone where someone did not vote?” “I did, didn’t I?” “Can you scan a ballot more than once and COUNT THEM?” “I just did it.” Watch the screen: blank or unresolved ballot → green highlight appears → “Vote added for choice ‘Joseph R. Biden (Dem)’.” Then the same physical ballot goes through the scanner again… and again. This is the process they used while the counting dragged on for days after Election Day. One clean day of voting. No weeks of “adjudication.” No multiple scans in the dark. That’s all patriots have ever asked for. They still fight it with everything they have. Follow me for more intel drops!
1:56

🚨THIS IS HOW THEY ADJUDICATED YOUR VOTE AWAY IN 2020 Georgia election supervisor walks through the Dominion software on camera and shows exactly how it worked: “So you made a vote for someone where someone did not vote?” “I did, didn’t I?” “Can you scan a ballot more than once and COUNT THEM?” “I just did it.” Watch the screen: blank or unresolved ballot → green highlight appears → “Vote added for choice ‘Joseph R. Biden (Dem)’.” Then the same physical ballot goes through the scanner again… and again. This is the process they used while the counting dragged on for days after Election Day. One clean day of voting. No weeks of “adjudication.” No multiple scans in the dark. That’s all patriots have ever asked for. They still fight it with everything they have. Follow me for more intel drops!

QThestorm

13,550 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

2026 Investigation into the Fulton County 2020 Election found that Fulton County destroyed 374,128 ballot images for nearly all in-person voting, and selectively and willfully destroyed 132,280 electronic absentee ballot image authentication files, or "SHA" files, for the 2020 Election, which are able to prove that ballots were tampered with, altered, or replaced. These are HUGE violations of both state and federal violations. Nearly HALF of the ballot images for the 5 MILLION ballots cast across the state of Georgia for the 2020 Election were destroyed. Election data must be saved up to 22 months. If you wanted to cover up election fraud, this is how you would do it. Simply put, ballot images, not the paper ballot, is used to count the vote, and without the ballot images, no votes could be counted, audits can NOT be conducted or could be accurate, votes can't be authenticated, and elections could not be certified. Fulton County admitted that they "failed to preserve the majority of ballot images," in the Curling v. Raffensperger case. The Secretary of State's General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the unlawful actions of country and state, to even include giving false statements of fact and law under oath, saying that Georgia Law did NOT require ballot images to be preserved from the 2020 Election. So every ballot has a "ballot image," which is what is counted for the vote and used to authenticate the vote. The "SHA" authentication files are like a "finger print" which is assigned to each ballot as it is scanned to VALIDATE the ballot image in the even of an audit or investigation to determine if a ballot image has been tampered with, altered, or replaced... These files do not "disappear" by accident, and were manually wiped to prevent ANY authentication of ballots, along with the ballot images, covering up election fraud. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. The 2020 Election was stolen.
2:44

2026 Investigation into the Fulton County 2020 Election found that Fulton County destroyed 374,128 ballot images for nearly all in-person voting, and selectively and willfully destroyed 132,280 electronic absentee ballot image authentication files, or "SHA" files, for the 2020 Election, which are able to prove that ballots were tampered with, altered, or replaced. These are HUGE violations of both state and federal violations. Nearly HALF of the ballot images for the 5 MILLION ballots cast across the state of Georgia for the 2020 Election were destroyed. Election data must be saved up to 22 months. If you wanted to cover up election fraud, this is how you would do it. Simply put, ballot images, not the paper ballot, is used to count the vote, and without the ballot images, no votes could be counted, audits can NOT be conducted or could be accurate, votes can't be authenticated, and elections could not be certified. Fulton County admitted that they "failed to preserve the majority of ballot images," in the Curling v. Raffensperger case. The Secretary of State's General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the unlawful actions of country and state, to even include giving false statements of fact and law under oath, saying that Georgia Law did NOT require ballot images to be preserved from the 2020 Election. So every ballot has a "ballot image," which is what is counted for the vote and used to authenticate the vote. The "SHA" authentication files are like a "finger print" which is assigned to each ballot as it is scanned to VALIDATE the ballot image in the even of an audit or investigation to determine if a ballot image has been tampered with, altered, or replaced... These files do not "disappear" by accident, and were manually wiped to prevent ANY authentication of ballots, along with the ballot images, covering up election fraud. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. The 2020 Election was stolen.

The SCIF

162,581 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 THIS IS DISGUSTING. What we’re watching in California is election corruption in plain sight. NBC just admitted it: “They’d need a flood of ballots coming in the wee hours of the morning to lift both Dems above (R) Steve Hilton.” While Florida and Texas had clear results on election night, California drags it out with mysterious late-night ballot dumps. This isn’t democracy. This is how a corrupt one-party state cheats to stay in power. Enough. If Republicans like John Thune actually fought back and demanded real election integrity reforms — paper ballots, same-day counting, voter ID, no more hidden mail-ins — we could stop this. Californians deserve better. Steve Hilton is fighting for real change. Share if you’re tired of the games. #StopTheStealCA #HiltonForGovernor #ElectionIntegrityNow
0:33

🚨 THIS IS DISGUSTING. What we’re watching in California is election corruption in plain sight. NBC just admitted it: “They’d need a flood of ballots coming in the wee hours of the morning to lift both Dems above (R) Steve Hilton.” While Florida and Texas had clear results on election night, California drags it out with mysterious late-night ballot dumps. This isn’t democracy. This is how a corrupt one-party state cheats to stay in power. Enough. If Republicans like John Thune actually fought back and demanded real election integrity reforms — paper ballots, same-day counting, voter ID, no more hidden mail-ins — we could stop this. Californians deserve better. Steve Hilton is fighting for real change. Share if you’re tired of the games. #StopTheStealCA #HiltonForGovernor #ElectionIntegrityNow

Reverend Jordan Wells

1,218,652 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

If you received a Mail-In Ballot even though you DID NOT request one… you may have already “unknowingly voted” and will not be able to vote on Election Day 🔴 MEMORIZE AND FOLLOW THESE STEPS IF THAT HAPPENS 1. He’s suggesting to request a mail-in ballot. DO NOT DO THAT… this only applies if you DID NOT request a ballot. 2. DO NOT OPEN your mail in ballot that you did not request. Even if you get multiple. 3. Bring your Unopened Mail-in ballot on Election Day to vote. —— when you get there, there’s a high statistical chance they will tell you that you’ve already voted… —— don’t complain or say election interference. 4. They will give you a provisional ballot, which will let you vote, but it will be investigated. Don’t fill it out. —— what they don’t tell you is that they’ll count the mail-in ballot you did not request, and won’t count the provisional ballot. —— ask for a supervisor to confirm everything one more time that you’ve already voted. 5. CALL YOUR SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT (non-emergency), NOT THE POLICE —— make sure you have this number pre-loaded on your phone. 6. Tell the Sheriff line you need to report identify theft at a “RETAIL LOCATION”, tell them you watched it happen, and you’re still there. Tell them you need a deputy to respond. —— DO NOT say polling place… —— do not mention ballots, or voting 7. The Sheriff is going to show up and speak to who you spoke to at the polling place (election worker and Supervisor)… they will get the same story. That you already voted. 8. After that, take out your mail-in ballot…. And say “this is my mail-in ballot, it’s not opened and I have not voted! Somebody has stolen my identity.” 9. You will get a report right then and there on the books. —— DO NOT surrender your ballot. There is no requirement by law to surrender it, because it’s your property. This is my evidence, they’ve stolen my ID, I’m keeping it. 10. Now you have empowered a Sheriff to force the right type of investigation, whom actually has the ability to investigate and seize ballot boxes. Please share this everywhere… I don’t care if you copy and paste everything yourself. Just get this out there. 🙏
3:08

If you received a Mail-In Ballot even though you DID NOT request one… you may have already “unknowingly voted” and will not be able to vote on Election Day 🔴 MEMORIZE AND FOLLOW THESE STEPS IF THAT HAPPENS 1. He’s suggesting to request a mail-in ballot. DO NOT DO THAT… this only applies if you DID NOT request a ballot. 2. DO NOT OPEN your mail in ballot that you did not request. Even if you get multiple. 3. Bring your Unopened Mail-in ballot on Election Day to vote. —— when you get there, there’s a high statistical chance they will tell you that you’ve already voted… —— don’t complain or say election interference. 4. They will give you a provisional ballot, which will let you vote, but it will be investigated. Don’t fill it out. —— what they don’t tell you is that they’ll count the mail-in ballot you did not request, and won’t count the provisional ballot. —— ask for a supervisor to confirm everything one more time that you’ve already voted. 5. CALL YOUR SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT (non-emergency), NOT THE POLICE —— make sure you have this number pre-loaded on your phone. 6. Tell the Sheriff line you need to report identify theft at a “RETAIL LOCATION”, tell them you watched it happen, and you’re still there. Tell them you need a deputy to respond. —— DO NOT say polling place… —— do not mention ballots, or voting 7. The Sheriff is going to show up and speak to who you spoke to at the polling place (election worker and Supervisor)… they will get the same story. That you already voted. 8. After that, take out your mail-in ballot…. And say “this is my mail-in ballot, it’s not opened and I have not voted! Somebody has stolen my identity.” 9. You will get a report right then and there on the books. —— DO NOT surrender your ballot. There is no requirement by law to surrender it, because it’s your property. This is my evidence, they’ve stolen my ID, I’m keeping it. 10. Now you have empowered a Sheriff to force the right type of investigation, whom actually has the ability to investigate and seize ballot boxes. Please share this everywhere… I don’t care if you copy and paste everything yourself. Just get this out there. 🙏

MJTruthUltra

262,444 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 CANADA IS ON THE BRINK—THE GLOBALIST TAKEOVER IS UNDERWAY! 🚨 🔴 A battle for control is raging in Canada. Power is shifting, forces are moving, and the question is—WHO will take control? 🔴 Is Canada still a free nation? Or has it already fallen to the unelected elites—the financial oligarchs, the WEF puppets, and the globalist machine? 🔥 Trudeau’s government is collapsing. The system is crumbling. And waiting in the shadows? Mark Carney—the WEF’s golden boy—ready to be installed without a single vote cast. But WHO is really backing him? And WHAT does this mean for the people of Canada? 📢 This isn’t just a Canadian crisis—this is a GLOBAL crisis. What happens in Canada will set the stage for the fight ahead. The forces keeping control, the ones preparing to take it, and the battle that will define the future. 💥 TONIGHT, we bring together a panel of experts—Freedom Train International Ambassadors from around the world—to expose the TRUTH behind Canada’s crisis. 🚨 This is more than politics. This is a takeover in real-time. The question is—will the people take their country back before it’s too late? 🚨 🔴 Join us. Stay with us. The truth starts NOW. 🔴 drkimchi Liz Gunn Peter R Mac Isaac What’s Up Canada 2.0 Becca 🇨🇦 Malue Montclairre
1:45

🚨 CANADA IS ON THE BRINK—THE GLOBALIST TAKEOVER IS UNDERWAY! 🚨 🔴 A battle for control is raging in Canada. Power is shifting, forces are moving, and the question is—WHO will take control? 🔴 Is Canada still a free nation? Or has it already fallen to the unelected elites—the financial oligarchs, the WEF puppets, and the globalist machine? 🔥 Trudeau’s government is collapsing. The system is crumbling. And waiting in the shadows? Mark Carney—the WEF’s golden boy—ready to be installed without a single vote cast. But WHO is really backing him? And WHAT does this mean for the people of Canada? 📢 This isn’t just a Canadian crisis—this is a GLOBAL crisis. What happens in Canada will set the stage for the fight ahead. The forces keeping control, the ones preparing to take it, and the battle that will define the future. 💥 TONIGHT, we bring together a panel of experts—Freedom Train International Ambassadors from around the world—to expose the TRUTH behind Canada’s crisis. 🚨 This is more than politics. This is a takeover in real-time. The question is—will the people take their country back before it’s too late? 🚨 🔴 Join us. Stay with us. The truth starts NOW. 🔴 drkimchi Liz Gunn Peter R Mac Isaac What’s Up Canada 2.0 Becca 🇨🇦 Malue Montclairre

Jim Ferguson

200,724 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There it is folks… Hurricane Helene was about cheating in the Election 🚨 The North Carolina Board of Elections Changed the Voting Rules in the Counties Affected by the Hurricane 10 Days before Early Voting Starts 🔴 RULE CHANGES • Easier access to Absentee Ballots • More time to apply for ballots • Drop off ANYWHERE in the state • “Assistance Teams” to help collect the fake ballots • The county board will also hire “poll workers” from other counties and move them all around the state —— nobody knows who these poll workers could be. • This is a major red flag… if ‘Voters’ can drop off their ballots ANYWHERE in the state, how can anyone contest voter turnout in any county? —— for example, if one county has 15,000 registered voters, we could now see a 30,000 voter turnout, and this could happen in any county in the entire state. • In 2020, it took North Carolina 10 Days to certify the election. How long will it take this time? First it was Covid… when they changed the rules. Now they’re using weather warfare…
2:39

There it is folks… Hurricane Helene was about cheating in the Election 🚨 The North Carolina Board of Elections Changed the Voting Rules in the Counties Affected by the Hurricane 10 Days before Early Voting Starts 🔴 RULE CHANGES • Easier access to Absentee Ballots • More time to apply for ballots • Drop off ANYWHERE in the state • “Assistance Teams” to help collect the fake ballots • The county board will also hire “poll workers” from other counties and move them all around the state —— nobody knows who these poll workers could be. • This is a major red flag… if ‘Voters’ can drop off their ballots ANYWHERE in the state, how can anyone contest voter turnout in any county? —— for example, if one county has 15,000 registered voters, we could now see a 30,000 voter turnout, and this could happen in any county in the entire state. • In 2020, it took North Carolina 10 Days to certify the election. How long will it take this time? First it was Covid… when they changed the rules. Now they’re using weather warfare…

MJTruthUltra

3,776,845 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

California voter says she still gets mail in ballots at her home for entire families who used to live there as long as 8 years ago She says she knows California Democrats are rigging their elections and say LA mayor Karen Bass only won because of fraud mail in ballot dumps “Shocked. Nobody's talking about this. In Gavin Newsom's California, they called the recall against him prop 50 and his reelection bid in about, give or take 120 seconds. You can have your ballot counted, but you didn't even leave the parking lot of the polling center yet. Your vote did not count because it didn't even go on the truck yet, let alone get processed and counted. So the biggest state in the country, they're calling elections in 10 minutes. Let's go back to 2022 to the LA mayoral race. The day before the election, the LA Times drops an article Oh, the days of election day results are over. This election may take weeks to count. Sure. On election night, Caruso's got a strong lead. Time to go to bed, right? Uh oh. They only count votes on Tuesdays or Thursdays. So it took 3 weeks to count every ballot. Suddenly, massive mail in voter dumps kept coming in only for Caruso and Bass, but he was in a heavy lead. Where was those ballots coming from? The morgue, the cemetery, Korea town, East LA. Yeah, sure. We believe you. I still get ballots. To my home for people who haven't lived here in seven or eight years. Their mothers, their sisters, their brothers, their uncles, their cousins, who probably never even lived in California. We don't trust these elections. Democrats vote early, Republicans don't. So how can it be that all the new ballot dumps were for Democrats when they're the ones who usually vote in the beginning? Doesn't make sense. So since that election, everything's changed. The whole state's been counted in under 10 minutes. Sure. — Karen Bass was selected, not elected. — I've studied these elections now, these COVID elections for five years. We have to make it too big to rig. So in order to do that, we have to play their game bottom line. It's a terrible game, but we have to do it. And then we can make all the laws we want when we're back in charge. But right now, we got to take it back. We got to flip California red. And the only way we're going to do it is to play their stupid game”
2:59

California voter says she still gets mail in ballots at her home for entire families who used to live there as long as 8 years ago She says she knows California Democrats are rigging their elections and say LA mayor Karen Bass only won because of fraud mail in ballot dumps “Shocked. Nobody's talking about this. In Gavin Newsom's California, they called the recall against him prop 50 and his reelection bid in about, give or take 120 seconds. You can have your ballot counted, but you didn't even leave the parking lot of the polling center yet. Your vote did not count because it didn't even go on the truck yet, let alone get processed and counted. So the biggest state in the country, they're calling elections in 10 minutes. Let's go back to 2022 to the LA mayoral race. The day before the election, the LA Times drops an article Oh, the days of election day results are over. This election may take weeks to count. Sure. On election night, Caruso's got a strong lead. Time to go to bed, right? Uh oh. They only count votes on Tuesdays or Thursdays. So it took 3 weeks to count every ballot. Suddenly, massive mail in voter dumps kept coming in only for Caruso and Bass, but he was in a heavy lead. Where was those ballots coming from? The morgue, the cemetery, Korea town, East LA. Yeah, sure. We believe you. I still get ballots. To my home for people who haven't lived here in seven or eight years. Their mothers, their sisters, their brothers, their uncles, their cousins, who probably never even lived in California. We don't trust these elections. Democrats vote early, Republicans don't. So how can it be that all the new ballot dumps were for Democrats when they're the ones who usually vote in the beginning? Doesn't make sense. So since that election, everything's changed. The whole state's been counted in under 10 minutes. Sure. — Karen Bass was selected, not elected. — I've studied these elections now, these COVID elections for five years. We have to make it too big to rig. So in order to do that, we have to play their game bottom line. It's a terrible game, but we have to do it. And then we can make all the laws we want when we're back in charge. But right now, we got to take it back. We got to flip California red. And the only way we're going to do it is to play their stupid game”

Wall Street Apes

89,915 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING UPDATE: Trump-backed FL governor candidate Byron Donalds (R) is exposing David Jolly (D) for STILL REFUSING A DEBATE, running a "BASEMENT" campaign Jolly sees Republican energy and is terrified! RUSH THE POLLS ☀️ This leftist wants AMNESTY for illegals, opposes requiring proof of citizenship to vote, will levy an insane $1K hurricane tax on Florida households — while Byron wants to go full FLORIDIANS FIRST, MAHA and keeping taxes low "My opponent doesn't want to debate. He doesn't do public meetings except for the people maybe in that room, but he doesn't put them online!" Florida Republicans are starting to increase their mail-in ballot returns and it needs to continue. KEEP FLORIDA RED AT ALL COSTS.
0:34

🚨 BREAKING UPDATE: Trump-backed FL governor candidate Byron Donalds (R) is exposing David Jolly (D) for STILL REFUSING A DEBATE, running a "BASEMENT" campaign Jolly sees Republican energy and is terrified! RUSH THE POLLS ☀️ This leftist wants AMNESTY for illegals, opposes requiring proof of citizenship to vote, will levy an insane $1K hurricane tax on Florida households — while Byron wants to go full FLORIDIANS FIRST, MAHA and keeping taxes low "My opponent doesn't want to debate. He doesn't do public meetings except for the people maybe in that room, but he doesn't put them online!" Florida Republicans are starting to increase their mail-in ballot returns and it needs to continue. KEEP FLORIDA RED AT ALL COSTS.

Eric Daugherty

34,803 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

“They cannot believe this result, say that the only way that this could be true is if it was fraud and cheating.” Actually no, it’s not that “the only way Spencer Pratt could lose is if there was fraud and cheating.” At least not for me and for most people I’ve spoken to or seen speaking. And I understand that had he advanced to the general, Pratt would’ve had an uphill battle and a hell of a long shot in front of him. The issue isn’t “it must be fraud;” the issue is that in California and these progressive-run states and cities, we’ve built an electoral system that begs the public to mistrust it—not because we lose but because it’s not as secure as it could be; it is objectively left open to vulnerabilities, and we can only assume this is purposeful and willful. An election that requires no photo ID to prove you are who you say you are is open to fraud. A bad actor needs only your name and address, and they could cast a vote in person in your stead, and you wouldn’t know until your vote got rejected and you had to cast a provisional ballot. There’s no security against that. Again, if a person knows your name and address, they can vote for you. No other info is given at the vote center. And since Covid, we mass mail out ballots to every single voter—even to people who don’t want them. I see ballots everywhere, discarded on apartment complex mailboxes because they belong to someone who no longer lives there. I’ve received ballots that aren’t mine. I’ve had my ballot sent to an address that’s not mine. And I can’t request to not have a ballot sent to me. It’s forced on me—even if I vote in person. And universal mail-in ballots present another very easy way a person could vote on your behalf—and again, you wouldn’t know until you tried to vote, got rejected, and had to fill out a provisional ballot. Yes, your ballot showing up at your door is super convenient; it also opens the door to fraud. And a mere 7 years ago, we didn’t do it like this, and still people who wanted or needed to vote by mail could do it; they just had to request it. And under that system, nobody screamed “voter suppression” or “disenfranchisement,” but now we do—not because it’s actually voter suppression but because we’ve gotten used to the convenience. And why are we allowing for ballot harvesting? Why should it be legal for you to collect ballots en masse from people you don’t know and aren’t related to? Again, that opens the door to fraud, tampering, and undue influence. And why do we accept mail-in ballots that arrive seven days post election? California gives you so many avenues and so much time (a full month) to return your ballot that you should be able to get your ballot to its final destination by election night—not just in the mail but to its final destination. This is called…being an adult and mailing things on time. Not voter suppression. It’s not a matter of opinion that all of the above opens our elections to more fraud and general mistrust; it’s a matter of fact. We’re trading security for convenience. That trade-off might be worth it to Democrats, but it shouldn’t be, and it’s not worth it to all of us. A country cannot stand if nearly half or half or more than half of the populace doesn’t trust the election process. That’s not a Republican issue or a MAGA issue; that’s a United States of America issue. So no, it’s not about “my guy wins or it’s fraud.” It’s about objectively we’re leaving our elections vulnerable to fraudulent activity. We’re the greatest nation in the world, and yet other countries have more secure (and also quicker) electoral processes. That’s unacceptable. None of the above would put undue burden on a voter—and yet all of it would help secure the voter and fortify against fraud.
0:39

“They cannot believe this result, say that the only way that this could be true is if it was fraud and cheating.” Actually no, it’s not that “the only way Spencer Pratt could lose is if there was fraud and cheating.” At least not for me and for most people I’ve spoken to or seen speaking. And I understand that had he advanced to the general, Pratt would’ve had an uphill battle and a hell of a long shot in front of him. The issue isn’t “it must be fraud;” the issue is that in California and these progressive-run states and cities, we’ve built an electoral system that begs the public to mistrust it—not because we lose but because it’s not as secure as it could be; it is objectively left open to vulnerabilities, and we can only assume this is purposeful and willful. An election that requires no photo ID to prove you are who you say you are is open to fraud. A bad actor needs only your name and address, and they could cast a vote in person in your stead, and you wouldn’t know until your vote got rejected and you had to cast a provisional ballot. There’s no security against that. Again, if a person knows your name and address, they can vote for you. No other info is given at the vote center. And since Covid, we mass mail out ballots to every single voter—even to people who don’t want them. I see ballots everywhere, discarded on apartment complex mailboxes because they belong to someone who no longer lives there. I’ve received ballots that aren’t mine. I’ve had my ballot sent to an address that’s not mine. And I can’t request to not have a ballot sent to me. It’s forced on me—even if I vote in person. And universal mail-in ballots present another very easy way a person could vote on your behalf—and again, you wouldn’t know until you tried to vote, got rejected, and had to fill out a provisional ballot. Yes, your ballot showing up at your door is super convenient; it also opens the door to fraud. And a mere 7 years ago, we didn’t do it like this, and still people who wanted or needed to vote by mail could do it; they just had to request it. And under that system, nobody screamed “voter suppression” or “disenfranchisement,” but now we do—not because it’s actually voter suppression but because we’ve gotten used to the convenience. And why are we allowing for ballot harvesting? Why should it be legal for you to collect ballots en masse from people you don’t know and aren’t related to? Again, that opens the door to fraud, tampering, and undue influence. And why do we accept mail-in ballots that arrive seven days post election? California gives you so many avenues and so much time (a full month) to return your ballot that you should be able to get your ballot to its final destination by election night—not just in the mail but to its final destination. This is called…being an adult and mailing things on time. Not voter suppression. It’s not a matter of opinion that all of the above opens our elections to more fraud and general mistrust; it’s a matter of fact. We’re trading security for convenience. That trade-off might be worth it to Democrats, but it shouldn’t be, and it’s not worth it to all of us. A country cannot stand if nearly half or half or more than half of the populace doesn’t trust the election process. That’s not a Republican issue or a MAGA issue; that’s a United States of America issue. So no, it’s not about “my guy wins or it’s fraud.” It’s about objectively we’re leaving our elections vulnerable to fraudulent activity. We’re the greatest nation in the world, and yet other countries have more secure (and also quicker) electoral processes. That’s unacceptable. None of the above would put undue burden on a voter—and yet all of it would help secure the voter and fortify against fraud.

Natalie Jean Beisner

25,694 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨SHOCKING R*PE GANG STATS: 4-5% PAKISTANI MUSLIM MEN IN UK BUT MAKE UP 90% OF GROOMING GANG CONVICTIONS! 😱 Tommy Robinson Reveals Why It Is Almost Exclusively Pakistani Muslim Men Who Operate These Grooming Gangs And The Astonishing Numbers He Exposes ☪️ Why is it predominantly Pakistani Muslim men that are mass r*ping British kids? Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 explains: “In UK, Muslim men, especially Pakistanis, make up 4-5% of the British population, yet they’re responsible for 90% of convictions for groups of men that r*pe kids. Why?” “It’s all to do with their culture and their religious beliefs.” He says what we all know to be true: it is religious and culturally driven. This is an open secret within these r*pe gangs. They operate openly with family, friends, and the wider community. This stands in stark contrast to any other kind of child sexual exploitation, which is typically carried out in secret and brings shame on the perpetrator. In those cases, you will be ostracised, attacked, or worse if you are found to be a p*do. Even prisons have special wings to protect such offenders because they would not be safe among the general population. Yet with these Pakistani r*pe gangs, the abuse happens in the open, and everyone in the community is either involved or knows about it.
1:20

🚨SHOCKING R*PE GANG STATS: 4-5% PAKISTANI MUSLIM MEN IN UK BUT MAKE UP 90% OF GROOMING GANG CONVICTIONS! 😱 Tommy Robinson Reveals Why It Is Almost Exclusively Pakistani Muslim Men Who Operate These Grooming Gangs And The Astonishing Numbers He Exposes ☪️ Why is it predominantly Pakistani Muslim men that are mass r*ping British kids? Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 explains: “In UK, Muslim men, especially Pakistanis, make up 4-5% of the British population, yet they’re responsible for 90% of convictions for groups of men that r*pe kids. Why?” “It’s all to do with their culture and their religious beliefs.” He says what we all know to be true: it is religious and culturally driven. This is an open secret within these r*pe gangs. They operate openly with family, friends, and the wider community. This stands in stark contrast to any other kind of child sexual exploitation, which is typically carried out in secret and brings shame on the perpetrator. In those cases, you will be ostracised, attacked, or worse if you are found to be a p*do. Even prisons have special wings to protect such offenders because they would not be safe among the general population. Yet with these Pakistani r*pe gangs, the abuse happens in the open, and everyone in the community is either involved or knows about it.

J Stewart

58,048 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten