Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This is when Marco Rubio was admitting that the U.S.and other Countries owed Ukraine after a certain deal was made about Nuclear Weapons and Russia ended up breaking that Contract and this Country isn’t far from it! 🤬

Suzie rizzio

231,680 subscribers

13,432 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Komedi

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Would Russia have invaded Ukraine if Ukraine still had nuclear weapons? A new nuclear arms race is accelerating. Ukraine has become the cautionary tale: a country that gave up nuclear weapons- and was invaded. The result? Eroded trust and a world less willing to disarm.

Would Russia have invaded Ukraine if Ukraine still had nuclear weapons? A new nuclear arms race is accelerating. Ukraine has become the cautionary tale: a country that gave up nuclear weapons- and was invaded. The result? Eroded trust and a world less willing to disarm.

Bianca Nobilo

67,866 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Trump on the flawed Iran Nuclear Deal: "Iran can't have nuclear weapons.-- The deal that was made with Obama-- It was a terrible deal-- That gave them a clear path to a nuclear weapon."

Trump on the flawed Iran Nuclear Deal: "Iran can't have nuclear weapons.-- The deal that was made with Obama-- It was a terrible deal-- That gave them a clear path to a nuclear weapon."

Libs of TikTok

170,713 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 BREAKING: Sec. Marco Rubio just MIC DROPPED our ungrateful allies “There was a couple of leaders in Europe who said that this was ‘not Europe's war?’ Well, UKRAINE is not America's war — and yet we've contributed more to that fight than ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!” 🫳🏻🎤

🚨 BREAKING: Sec. Marco Rubio just MIC DROPPED our ungrateful allies “There was a couple of leaders in Europe who said that this was ‘not Europe's war?’ Well, UKRAINE is not America's war — and yet we've contributed more to that fight than ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!” 🫳🏻🎤

Eric Daugherty

997,844 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

'Russia is conducting nuclear weapons tests. You just don't know about it' — Trump. - So why do we need to test our nuclear weapons? - Because we need to understand how they work. And the reason I talk about testing is that Russia announced it is going to conduct a test. If you notice, North Korea constantly conducts tests. Other countries test as well. We are the only country that does not conduct tests. And I don't want us to be the only country that doesn't do it. - Are you saying that after more than 30 years, the US will start detonating nuclear weapons for testing again? - I'm saying we will conduct tests. Nuclear weapons tests, like other countries do, yes [we will detonate]. - But the only country conducting nuclear tests is North Korea. China and Russia do not. - No, no, Russia conducts nuclear tests. And China also conducts tests, you just don't know about it. - What Russia did recently was essentially tests of nuclear weapons delivery systems, that is, missiles. - Russia conducts tests, and China conducts tests, they just don't talk about it, you see? They are not open societies. We are different. We discuss openly. We have to discuss it, otherwise you journalists will write about it anyway. They don't have reporters who will write about it. We do. - SK

'Russia is conducting nuclear weapons tests. You just don't know about it' — Trump. - So why do we need to test our nuclear weapons? - Because we need to understand how they work. And the reason I talk about testing is that Russia announced it is going to conduct a test. If you notice, North Korea constantly conducts tests. Other countries test as well. We are the only country that does not conduct tests. And I don't want us to be the only country that doesn't do it. - Are you saying that after more than 30 years, the US will start detonating nuclear weapons for testing again? - I'm saying we will conduct tests. Nuclear weapons tests, like other countries do, yes [we will detonate]. - But the only country conducting nuclear tests is North Korea. China and Russia do not. - No, no, Russia conducts nuclear tests. And China also conducts tests, you just don't know about it. - What Russia did recently was essentially tests of nuclear weapons delivery systems, that is, missiles. - Russia conducts tests, and China conducts tests, they just don't talk about it, you see? They are not open societies. We are different. We discuss openly. We have to discuss it, otherwise you journalists will write about it anyway. They don't have reporters who will write about it. We do. - SK

Zlatti71

25,888 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

This was from the first time Trump decided we needed to go into Iran and destroy their alleged nuclear weapons! Rubio is a disgrace to this Country and especially Cubans! 👇👇

This was from the first time Trump decided we needed to go into Iran and destroy their alleged nuclear weapons! Rubio is a disgrace to this Country and especially Cubans! 👇👇

Suzie rizzio

490,260 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Chancellor Merz: "If we had Ukraine as member in NATO, which was applied in 2008, and the Americans gave support to that, the French and the German government were against it. You can again speculate, would this war had happened? Ukraine was then a big nuclear power. They were the third biggest nuclear power in the world, and they agreed to get rid of all the nuclear weapons. And then after Russia attacked Ukraine, would this have happened with nuclear weapons on the ground? You can ask the same question again. No, this war is now happening and we have to stop it now, this is our task."

Chancellor Merz: "If we had Ukraine as member in NATO, which was applied in 2008, and the Americans gave support to that, the French and the German government were against it. You can again speculate, would this war had happened? Ukraine was then a big nuclear power. They were the third biggest nuclear power in the world, and they agreed to get rid of all the nuclear weapons. And then after Russia attacked Ukraine, would this have happened with nuclear weapons on the ground? You can ask the same question again. No, this war is now happening and we have to stop it now, this is our task."

Anton Gerashchenko

251,299 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Russia and the Trump administration are lying about the war in Ukraine. Their latest recycled claim is that 'NATO provoked the war in Ukraine.' This silly narrative is usually spread by Russians, but recently they were joined in by the richest man in the world, Elon Musk. This claim stems from a statement made by American Secretary of State James A. Baker to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990, suggesting that NATO would move "not one inch eastward" if Russia accepted Germany's unification. However, this assurance was only about Germany and was not formalized in any binding agreement. Even Gorbachev himself said that this promise was never made. Unlike the Budapest Memorandum from 1994, where Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees from the US, the UK, and Russia - guarantees that Russia blatantly violated by invading Ukraine in 2014. NATO isn’t some evil empire forcing countries to join. Nations like Poland, Estonia, and Lithuania chose to join NATO - because history showed them what happens when they don’t have protection. Russia wasn’t ‘provoked’ - these countries were just protecting themselves from Russian imperialism. And if anything, Russia’s the one driving countries toward NATO. Their invasion in Ukraine made Finland and Sweden ditch neutrality and run straight to NATO. Again, who invaded who? And which NATO countries have been invaded by Russia? Today, top US officials are spreading this exact lie about NATO provoking Russia. Elon Musk is now completely fixated on the US leaving NATO, pushing old falsehoods that were debunked long ago. He'll probably post around 300 times about this topic in the next week or so. And these same lies may soon be echoed by President Trump. And speaking of verbal statements, here’s Putin himself, in a 2008 interview, saying that Crimea is Ukraine.

Russia and the Trump administration are lying about the war in Ukraine. Their latest recycled claim is that 'NATO provoked the war in Ukraine.' This silly narrative is usually spread by Russians, but recently they were joined in by the richest man in the world, Elon Musk. This claim stems from a statement made by American Secretary of State James A. Baker to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990, suggesting that NATO would move "not one inch eastward" if Russia accepted Germany's unification. However, this assurance was only about Germany and was not formalized in any binding agreement. Even Gorbachev himself said that this promise was never made. Unlike the Budapest Memorandum from 1994, where Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees from the US, the UK, and Russia - guarantees that Russia blatantly violated by invading Ukraine in 2014. NATO isn’t some evil empire forcing countries to join. Nations like Poland, Estonia, and Lithuania chose to join NATO - because history showed them what happens when they don’t have protection. Russia wasn’t ‘provoked’ - these countries were just protecting themselves from Russian imperialism. And if anything, Russia’s the one driving countries toward NATO. Their invasion in Ukraine made Finland and Sweden ditch neutrality and run straight to NATO. Again, who invaded who? And which NATO countries have been invaded by Russia? Today, top US officials are spreading this exact lie about NATO provoking Russia. Elon Musk is now completely fixated on the US leaving NATO, pushing old falsehoods that were debunked long ago. He'll probably post around 300 times about this topic in the next week or so. And these same lies may soon be echoed by President Trump. And speaking of verbal statements, here’s Putin himself, in a 2008 interview, saying that Crimea is Ukraine.

Vatnik Soup

259,039 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

For the 1,000th time, here is proof that Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for American protection from Russia, and did so for the benefit of the world. This is from a Senate hearing, today:

For the 1,000th time, here is proof that Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for American protection from Russia, and did so for the benefit of the world. This is from a Senate hearing, today:

John Jackson

385,072 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.Dylan Johnson: "This is the largest humanitarian assistance response from the U.S. government in about 3 decades, and the moment this tragedy happened, Secretary Marco Rubio was very clear that he wanted to see a response that was big, that was fast, and that was effective—and that's exactly what we're delivering."

.Dylan Johnson: "This is the largest humanitarian assistance response from the U.S. government in about 3 decades, and the moment this tragedy happened, Secretary Marco Rubio was very clear that he wanted to see a response that was big, that was fast, and that was effective—and that's exactly what we're delivering."

Rapid Response 47

90,720 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Devout Christian Marco Rubio with a cross on his forehead echoes Russian propaganda live on air "It’s a proxy war between nuclear powers – the United States, helping Ukraine, and Russia – and it needs to come to an end," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Fox News. Rubio criticized Ukraine and the Europeans for not having a plan to end the conflict. But it is not Ukraine that needs to be stopped, forced and restricted. It is Russia that must be stopped and put under pressure.

Devout Christian Marco Rubio with a cross on his forehead echoes Russian propaganda live on air "It’s a proxy war between nuclear powers – the United States, helping Ukraine, and Russia – and it needs to come to an end," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Fox News. Rubio criticized Ukraine and the Europeans for not having a plan to end the conflict. But it is not Ukraine that needs to be stopped, forced and restricted. It is Russia that must be stopped and put under pressure.

NEXTA

326,347 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"... one of the things to understand about ending armed conflicts is oftentimes it looks totally hopeless until you have this breakthrough that sometimes is unforeseen." - Secretary Marco Rubio on Russia and Ukraine

"... one of the things to understand about ending armed conflicts is oftentimes it looks totally hopeless until you have this breakthrough that sometimes is unforeseen." - Secretary Marco Rubio on Russia and Ukraine

Department of State

89,727 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

291,786 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

New John Mearsheimer lecture on tactical nuclear weapons just dropped -- fascinating stuff. transcript from Grok Bot: "So it's just very important to understand that tactical nuclear weapons were seen for much of the 1950s as a magic weapon. Now, what happened to throw cold water on this whole line of thinking was a war game that was run in mid-June 1955. This is called Carte Blanche, and we had the situation where the Soviets would attack with conventional forces. We would use nuclear weapons, tactical nuclear weapons in response. And of course, the Soviets would use nuclear weapons of their own. Now, what happened in this war game, basically about 3,000 NATO aircraft from 11 different countries were employed in the war game. And about, I'd say, 335 nuclear weapons were employed. The usual range is 335 to 355. That's how many tactical nuclear weapons were employed in this war game. And by the way, the Russians, of course, employed nuclear weapons as well as the NATO forces in this war game. And in fact, the Russians or the Soviets ended up using or deploying or exploding more nuclear weapons, slightly more nuclear weapons than NATO did. But let's say the total was about 335 nuclear weapons. And the war was fought almost exclusively on West German soil. Now, what was the end result? The end result is that 1.7 million West Germans died and 3.5 million West Germans were wounded. Moreover, these numbers don't take into account the subsequent deaths that would occur as a result of the radiation poisoning. So you just want to think about that. You had a war game that went from June 20th to June 28th. This is 1955, the middle of the 50s, and it ended up with 1.7 million West Germans dead. What is this tell you? In effect, it tells you that you're destroying Germany to save Germany."

New John Mearsheimer lecture on tactical nuclear weapons just dropped -- fascinating stuff. transcript from Grok Bot: "So it's just very important to understand that tactical nuclear weapons were seen for much of the 1950s as a magic weapon. Now, what happened to throw cold water on this whole line of thinking was a war game that was run in mid-June 1955. This is called Carte Blanche, and we had the situation where the Soviets would attack with conventional forces. We would use nuclear weapons, tactical nuclear weapons in response. And of course, the Soviets would use nuclear weapons of their own. Now, what happened in this war game, basically about 3,000 NATO aircraft from 11 different countries were employed in the war game. And about, I'd say, 335 nuclear weapons were employed. The usual range is 335 to 355. That's how many tactical nuclear weapons were employed in this war game. And by the way, the Russians, of course, employed nuclear weapons as well as the NATO forces in this war game. And in fact, the Russians or the Soviets ended up using or deploying or exploding more nuclear weapons, slightly more nuclear weapons than NATO did. But let's say the total was about 335 nuclear weapons. And the war was fought almost exclusively on West German soil. Now, what was the end result? The end result is that 1.7 million West Germans died and 3.5 million West Germans were wounded. Moreover, these numbers don't take into account the subsequent deaths that would occur as a result of the radiation poisoning. So you just want to think about that. You had a war game that went from June 20th to June 28th. This is 1955, the middle of the 50s, and it ended up with 1.7 million West Germans dead. What is this tell you? In effect, it tells you that you're destroying Germany to save Germany."

@jason

55,179 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

Peskov continues repeating Lavrov's narratives that "Anchorage agreements" have failed, and Russia will continue the war. He says Russia will wait for new suggestions because President Trump was "sincere" in his wish to suggest some options but Ukraine refused them because Ukraine is "pushed" by Europeans. US also demonstrates "dualism", Peskov says, because it continues "pumping" Ukraine with weapons. Since Secretary Rubio has publicly confirmed that no "Anchorage agreements" exist or ever existed, it is obvious that Russia is now using this as a pretext for continuing the war. Russia's narrative is the following: Russia wants peace, Ukraine is pushed by Europe to fight, the US position is dual. It goes without saying that this is very far from the truth - the war was started by Russia and is continued by Russia. Ukraine has expressed our readiness for a ceasefire and negotiations many times. It is Russia that refuses any constructive steps towards peace.

Peskov continues repeating Lavrov's narratives that "Anchorage agreements" have failed, and Russia will continue the war. He says Russia will wait for new suggestions because President Trump was "sincere" in his wish to suggest some options but Ukraine refused them because Ukraine is "pushed" by Europeans. US also demonstrates "dualism", Peskov says, because it continues "pumping" Ukraine with weapons. Since Secretary Rubio has publicly confirmed that no "Anchorage agreements" exist or ever existed, it is obvious that Russia is now using this as a pretext for continuing the war. Russia's narrative is the following: Russia wants peace, Ukraine is pushed by Europe to fight, the US position is dual. It goes without saying that this is very far from the truth - the war was started by Russia and is continued by Russia. Ukraine has expressed our readiness for a ceasefire and negotiations many times. It is Russia that refuses any constructive steps towards peace.

Anton Gerashchenko

56,319 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

“Our national interest is about one thing, and that is Iran not getting anywhere near the capability to weaponize and have nuclear weapons. They’re not going to get anywhere near that capability. President Donald J. Trump has made that clear from day one.” —Secretary Marco Rubio

“Our national interest is about one thing, and that is Iran not getting anywhere near the capability to weaponize and have nuclear weapons. They’re not going to get anywhere near that capability. President Donald J. Trump has made that clear from day one.” —Secretary Marco Rubio

Department of State

153,109 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

💥 Rubio: "This is not our war. This is a war on another continent" And ultimately, according to the U.S. Secretary of State, the decision will be up to Ukraine and Russia: "It's not about imposing any deal on anyone." Rubio also stated that Trump held more meetings on the topic of the war in Ukraine than on any other issue — including trade.

💥 Rubio: "This is not our war. This is a war on another continent" And ultimately, according to the U.S. Secretary of State, the decision will be up to Ukraine and Russia: "It's not about imposing any deal on anyone." Rubio also stated that Trump held more meetings on the topic of the war in Ukraine than on any other issue — including trade.

NEXTA

86,184 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce