Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

173,546 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Ratoshi's profile picture
Ratoshi1 year ago

Chart is misleading. what does Y mean? Should be rent as percentage of income.

Leonid's profile picture
Leonid1 year ago

Inflation is a beast & the best way to tame it is to stack sats.

The Nomadic Goat's profile picture
The Nomadic Goat1 year ago

1993 had it coming, with this uneven gap. After that, it was normalized.

Viktor Shterev's profile picture
Viktor Shterev1 year ago

It will become only more worse

Novanoodle's profile picture
Novanoodle1 year ago

I would also like to see ages associated with this. For instance, what age was income in 1986 and how many of them have retired now compared to a larger number of millennials making less money. It's interesting but I'd like a bigger picture.

alpha CAPCOM's profile picture
alpha CAPCOM1 year ago

You also pay the rent in Bitcoin?

John Turner's profile picture
John Turner1 year ago

Looking at the income drops (roughly): 1990, Microsoft Windows, PCs, basic internet. 2000, Google, Amazon. 2007, AWS (cloud), Facebook, smartphones. It would be interesting to add a line showing growth/decline in skilled trades employment.

Roselyne Wanjiru ⚡'s profile picture
Roselyne Wanjiru ⚡1 year ago

It's impossible to outwork the money printer's aftermath. Multiple streams of income have a limit. So does passive income.

Sharif Aly's profile picture
Sharif Aly1 year ago

Looks like an advertisement for real estate.

Carlton's profile picture
Carlton1 year ago

There’s lots of reasons to buy Bitcoin but I’d argue this chart shows why owning real estate makes sense in a Keynesian system. Rent outpaces wages. And yes I know there’s tax and maintenance. Doesn’t matter. Rent inflation is still higher than wage growth.

Related Videos