Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This is why the House GOP refused Jack Smith's request that he be allowed to testify in public: Smith said he had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transfer of power. Also, he'd charge him again.

Bill Madden

363,355 subscribers

25,462 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Music News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

JACK SMITH: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retained classified docs, obstructed justice… I’d charge an ex president again regardless of party.”

JACK SMITH: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retained classified docs, obstructed justice… I’d charge an ex president again regardless of party.”

The Tennessee Holler

234,015 views • 7 months ago

.Rep. Jamie Raskin to Jack Smith: "Everybody here knows what you did wrong in Donald Trump's eyes and why he says you belong in prison...You found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election."

.Rep. Jamie Raskin to Jack Smith: "Everybody here knows what you did wrong in Donald Trump's eyes and why he says you belong in prison...You found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election."

CSPAN

208,390 views • 7 months ago

JACK SMITH: “Donald Trump willfully broke the law.” “Two separate grand juries supported these findings” “We developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity” “Trump engaged in criminal scheme to overturn results & prevent transfer of power. After leaving office Trump illegally kept classified docs…repeatedly tried to obstruct justice…NATSEC info held in a ballroom & bathroom”

JACK SMITH: “Donald Trump willfully broke the law.” “Two separate grand juries supported these findings” “We developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity” “Trump engaged in criminal scheme to overturn results & prevent transfer of power. After leaving office Trump illegally kept classified docs…repeatedly tried to obstruct justice…NATSEC info held in a ballroom & bathroom”

Maine

29,828 views • 7 months ago

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

Republicans against Trump

185,834 views • 8 months ago

JACK SMITH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

JACK SMITH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

The Tennessee Holler

79,390 views • 7 months ago

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.

Pod Save America

20,181 views • 7 months ago

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this

BREAKING: Super powerful words from Jack Smith just now: "The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity… No one should be above the law in this country and the law required he be held to account.” Every American needs to hear this

Brian Krassenstein

513,391 views • 7 months ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

PBS News

13,485 views • 7 months ago

Today, Jack Smith explained he had enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump tried to overturn the election illegally, tried to get fake electors, and in a separate case, stole classified documents and tried to hide them.

Today, Jack Smith explained he had enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump tried to overturn the election illegally, tried to get fake electors, and in a separate case, stole classified documents and tried to hide them.

Rep. Ted Lieu

24,281 views • 7 months ago

🚨HAPPENING NOW 🚨 Jack Smith says President Trump “engaged in a criminal scheme to over turn” the 2020 election.

🚨HAPPENING NOW 🚨 Jack Smith says President Trump “engaged in a criminal scheme to over turn” the 2020 election.

Breanna Morello

22,135 views • 7 months ago

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

The Bulwark

46,147 views • 7 months ago

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage

Aaron Rupar

316,735 views • 7 months ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Republicans against Trump

78,167 views • 7 months ago

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

FactPost

13,087 views • 7 months ago

Moynihan: I think a lot of Republicans feel triggered because that was essentially the case that Jack Smith had against Trump—going after him because Trump said that it wasn't a fair election Sellers: You had phone calls in places like Georgia where he would try to pressure people, and he'd say, go find me 11,000 votes, Jack Smith's case was about the fact that he had classified documents in his bathroom so Jack Smith's case was a little bit more robust.

Moynihan: I think a lot of Republicans feel triggered because that was essentially the case that Jack Smith had against Trump—going after him because Trump said that it wasn't a fair election Sellers: You had phone calls in places like Georgia where he would try to pressure people, and he'd say, go find me 11,000 votes, Jack Smith's case was about the fact that he had classified documents in his bathroom so Jack Smith's case was a little bit more robust.

Acyn

80,392 views • 6 months ago

Let’s be crystal clear. These aren’t “spin.” These aren’t “interpretations.” These are documented lies and legal conclusions — and we’re calling them what they are: lies. 1. Trump said he wasn’t in the Epstein files. He is in the files. Proven. Period. 2. Trump said he ran to lower prices. Inflation and costs for everyday Americans are still higher today than when he took office. That campaign promise was flatly false. 3. Trump promised he wouldn’t gut healthcare. He allowed the enhanced Obamacare subsidies to expire, causing premiums to jump and coverage to worsen for millions. That wasn’t an accident — it was a betrayal of his pledge. 4. Trump claimed he would be a peace-time president. He escalated military action without Congressional approval. That was a lie. 5. Trump said he lost the 2020 election because it was “rigged.” Special Counsel Jack Smith confirmed under oath that Trump privately acknowledged losing the 2020 election — even though he repeatedly claimed otherwise in public. That’s a lie layered on top of a lie. 6. Trump said he didn’t try to overturn the 2020 election. Smith testified that his investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the election and impede the lawful transfer of power, and that the Capitol riot “does not happen without” Trump’s actions. That isn’t opinion — that’s what the prosecutor said under oath. Trump lied about it. 7. Trump said he respected the rule of law. He was indicted on federal charges for illegally retaining classified documents and obstructing justice, and Smith explained he had powerful evidence of willful retention of sensitive materials and obstruction. Claiming he respected the law while hiding classified docs was a lie. 8. Trump said he stood for law and order. He refused to call off the mob on January 6 while people were in danger, and Smith testified the attack wouldn’t have happened without him. That claim was a lie. 9. Trump said he couldn’t be bought and wouldn’t abuse his office. He used his presidency to pardon allies convicted for crimes related to January 6 and pressured officials to manipulate election outcomes. That was a lie. 10. Trump said he always tells the truth. He has been documented making thousands of demonstrably false statements while also being accused — by the prosecutor himself — of engaging in criminal conduct. Claiming truthfulness after that is the ultimate lie. Bottom line: These aren’t partisan talking points. They’re documented claims, sworn testimony, legal findings, public data, and measurable outcomes. When someone tells the truth, it lines up with reality. When someone tells a lie, the record — not the rhetoric — reveals it.

Let’s be crystal clear. These aren’t “spin.” These aren’t “interpretations.” These are documented lies and legal conclusions — and we’re calling them what they are: lies. 1. Trump said he wasn’t in the Epstein files. He is in the files. Proven. Period. 2. Trump said he ran to lower prices. Inflation and costs for everyday Americans are still higher today than when he took office. That campaign promise was flatly false. 3. Trump promised he wouldn’t gut healthcare. He allowed the enhanced Obamacare subsidies to expire, causing premiums to jump and coverage to worsen for millions. That wasn’t an accident — it was a betrayal of his pledge. 4. Trump claimed he would be a peace-time president. He escalated military action without Congressional approval. That was a lie. 5. Trump said he lost the 2020 election because it was “rigged.” Special Counsel Jack Smith confirmed under oath that Trump privately acknowledged losing the 2020 election — even though he repeatedly claimed otherwise in public. That’s a lie layered on top of a lie. 6. Trump said he didn’t try to overturn the 2020 election. Smith testified that his investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the election and impede the lawful transfer of power, and that the Capitol riot “does not happen without” Trump’s actions. That isn’t opinion — that’s what the prosecutor said under oath. Trump lied about it. 7. Trump said he respected the rule of law. He was indicted on federal charges for illegally retaining classified documents and obstructing justice, and Smith explained he had powerful evidence of willful retention of sensitive materials and obstruction. Claiming he respected the law while hiding classified docs was a lie. 8. Trump said he stood for law and order. He refused to call off the mob on January 6 while people were in danger, and Smith testified the attack wouldn’t have happened without him. That claim was a lie. 9. Trump said he couldn’t be bought and wouldn’t abuse his office. He used his presidency to pardon allies convicted for crimes related to January 6 and pressured officials to manipulate election outcomes. That was a lie. 10. Trump said he always tells the truth. He has been documented making thousands of demonstrably false statements while also being accused — by the prosecutor himself — of engaging in criminal conduct. Claiming truthfulness after that is the ultimate lie. Bottom line: These aren’t partisan talking points. They’re documented claims, sworn testimony, legal findings, public data, and measurable outcomes. When someone tells the truth, it lines up with reality. When someone tells a lie, the record — not the rhetoric — reveals it.

MAGA Cult Slayer

249,182 views • 7 months ago

No Republicans today disputed Jack Smith’s findings. He issued an entire report and none of them disputed that Trump engaged in conspiracy to try to overturn the 2020 election.

No Republicans today disputed Jack Smith’s findings. He issued an entire report and none of them disputed that Trump engaged in conspiracy to try to overturn the 2020 election.

Rep. Ted Lieu

226,453 views • 7 months ago

JACK SMITH: ‘Respectfully’ Wants to Testify Publicly in Congress Former Special Counsel Jack Smith will testify to House Judiciary only if the hearing is public. Jim Jordan and Chuck Grassley will press him on the Trump/2020 probe & the move to obtain GOP Members’ phone records.

JACK SMITH: ‘Respectfully’ Wants to Testify Publicly in Congress Former Special Counsel Jack Smith will testify to House Judiciary only if the hearing is public. Jim Jordan and Chuck Grassley will press him on the Trump/2020 probe & the move to obtain GOP Members’ phone records.

Jay Sekulow

36,167 views • 10 months ago

WOW! CNN’s Jake Tapper just showed how horrific this Jack Smith report that was just dropped, is for Trump. “When the defendant lost the 2020 Presidential election, he resorted to crimes to try and stay in office. With private co-conspirator, the defendant launched a series of increasingly desperate plans to overturn the legitimate election results in 7 states that he had lost.”

WOW! CNN’s Jake Tapper just showed how horrific this Jack Smith report that was just dropped, is for Trump. “When the defendant lost the 2020 Presidential election, he resorted to crimes to try and stay in office. With private co-conspirator, the defendant launched a series of increasingly desperate plans to overturn the legitimate election results in 7 states that he had lost.”

Ed Krassenstein

2,202,041 views • 1 year ago

Whoa! The House Judiciary committee has released special counsel Jack Smith's 255-page deposition. The scathing indictment leaves ZERO doubt Trump should be in prison. The TRAITOR attempted to overturn the 2020 election, usurp the constitution, and overthrow American democracy.

Whoa! The House Judiciary committee has released special counsel Jack Smith's 255-page deposition. The scathing indictment leaves ZERO doubt Trump should be in prison. The TRAITOR attempted to overturn the 2020 election, usurp the constitution, and overthrow American democracy.

Bill Madden

46,944 views • 7 months ago