Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This is why they now have an—unconstitutional—liability shield guarding the flu jabs too mRNA needs the unconstitutional liability protection because it's actually a tool for mass slaughter

13,325 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

They might be in big trouble. Pfizer needed the covid injection recommended to children for liability protection. But the HHS Sec. Robert F Kennedy has just pulled the covid injection off the CDC schedule for healthy children. Pfizer are being exposed to more liability pressure AND Pfizer didn't report Maddie's injury to the FDA, who was in the children's clinical trial. TRANSCRIPT: Robert F Kennedy and Mikhaila Peterson: "So, what are your views on giving this COVID vaccine that they've made to kids? I know I'm from Canada, and I think that they're implementing that in order to go to school in Canada." Robert F Kennedy: "Well, they have to give it to kids because here's why": "They cannot market this vaccine without having an immunity shield. I mean, I sue pharmaceutical companies for a living, and I have enough criminal activity that I know about Pfizer at this point and Moderna that if they went ahead and marketed a vaccine where they end up killing people or injuring them, and I can sue them, they'd be through. So they're never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, an approved vaccine, without getting liability protection. Now, the Emergency Use Authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and the CARES Act. So as long as you take an emergency use, you can't sue them. "Once they get approved, now you can sue them, unless they can get it recommended for children." Because all vaccines that are recommended, officially recommended for children, get liability protection, even if an adult gets that vaccine. That's why they're going after kids. They know this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children, but they need to do it for the liability protection." "And here's how they know that it's going to injure kids" "During the Pfizer study, they only tested it on 1,300 children, and one of those, we now know, was a girl called Maddie de Garay. And we only know about this because she and her family came forward and told us what happened.

Humanspective

52,425 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Catherine Austin-Fitts just sounded the alarm. A pesticide liability shield will cause an “extinction-level event.” Why? It will absolutely destroy fertility. And she says this is no accident. It’s intentional. “Depopulation” is exactly what the elites want. “They’ve enjoyed so much success depopulating by giving vaccines corporate liability shields that you have Bayer, who bought Monsanto, coming around and trying to get both the feds and the states to give pesticide liability shields.” “If you look at the extraordinary amount of money and support that’s coming [from] the mega rich to support this, it’s no accident.” “There’s no way, given the science on this, that they don’t know.” “There’s no way it’s anything other than intentional.” “The battle for control of the food system is extraordinary.” “If you look at the Trump policies, you are looking at thousands of different actions by government to severely consolidate farming in agriculture.” Trump is pushing a pesticide liability shield on two fronts right now: First, House Republicans included a liability shield for pesticide companies in the 2026 Farm Bill. Trump personally urged Congress to pass it. Second, Monsanto is asking the Supreme Court to give them a liability shield in a case that will be heard later this month, Monsanto v. Durnell. And Trump’s DOJ sided with Monsanto. In case you haven’t noticed, Trump has completely abandoned and betrayed MAHA. The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts Paul Buitink 🎙

Holden Culotta

82,407 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce